ok who the fuck cares which is faster maseratis fast maye faster and maybe not as fast idc you would buy this because of its looks and interior and that it is fast ( obiously other cars are faster but still) imagine how many girls youd get driving this.... :)
All this guys down here have never take a corner on full throttle over 100mph and all are saying is this car is slow.. I had beaten a faggy R8 in a 3200gt Imagine what we could do in Gran Turismo MC.. Start "Driving" and save your opinions for later.. GTR?? 911?? Who is driving??? sure you don't..
If you're comparing a Mustang to a Maserati, you've totally missed the point. Terrific summary. "There may be faster and cheaper cars out there......"
@AnonymoussourceL0L 0-60 4.5 (4.8 is just a manufactures clams. for ex. 911 turbo s does 0-60 in 2.7 sec, but manufactures claims 3.1 so same here) also 1/4 mie 12.4 sec. 187 mph (302 kmh) not bad! How is this SLOW!!!??? if you had this car u would beat 99.9% cars you would see around you! SO?? come on.... it is not a bugatti but it is a very fast car
@JuveTube777 I can do 4.5 in a 29k Mustang GT or 4.8 in a 60K M3 or 2.5 in a 95k GTR. Point is, it is just too over priced for what it is. I know what you're saying, but here in Florida or at least where I live in Florida, the Maserati would be considered less of a stop and stare and more of an everyday kind of sports car. The performance just doesn't justify that $143k sticker.
@AnonymoussourceL0L btw, stock mustang gt 0-60 is more close to 4.8 - 5 m3 is not capable to reach 180mph or more and stock GTR 0-60 is somewhere 3 - 3.5 (engines are hand made and th performance varies) and yes, I see your point... performance of this maser is not worth of 140k but, Maserati is Maserati and ford, BMW or Nissan is you know. I've driven Mustang, which is hell of a fast car so is m3, but not faster than MC. for 140k, Maserati offers a real driving pleasure :)
4.5 In a mustang?? How old are you.. you talk about the only fact that doesnt matter.. we are talking about "Grand Tourers" here. Imagine this.. Highway.. rain is over but the floor is wet.. suddenly a 250k aston martin db9 2010 gives you the lights.. you know you cant stand a chance but you try your best as aproaching to a subtle curve making a rev match downshift as you get ready to accelerate.. you fail ..TCS kicks in to avoid wheel spin.. the DB9 passes you but if you were in the maserati..
@absolutinspire The first half I understood, but you lost me the second half. TCS kicks in on any car in the wet. But I would take the DB9 over the Maserati GT any day. I've seen reviews of Maserati GT's and I'm sorry, but their center consoles have 90s neon green lights, ugly plasticy buttons and design, and just over all a horrific arrangement of buttons just thrown into the car. At least the DB9 looks good, sounds good (Maybe not as nice), and has a wonderful interior.
@SuperMeatsause What's up with the M3's horrible engine note? Or the fact that it has a pitiful ammount of torque for a 4 liter V8? Or the fact that A Mustang can beat that? The simple answer is that no M3 will ever look as fantastic as this, or ever be this luxurious. Plus the M3 just sounds terrible and this doesn't
@AdrianC12345 the Maserati only looks fantastic from the front and the side. the rear end is decent but not as amazing as the front end. the interior is very outdated and as luxurious say a Ferrari. The only thing nice about the interior are the gauges, the paddle shifters, the leather, and maybe the steering wheel. the center stack and nav is very outdated. Plus, for the price, you expect this thing to do 0-60 in the low 4's. It is a luxury car with a sports car disguise.
@SuperMeatsause Interior very outdated? Then how do you compare the M3 to this? Or a Ferrari? Last time I checked the M3 was a good handling car with a decent interior which cost about 80K and the cheaperst Ferrari was over 200K and has an even worse nav system. Just look at the interior, there's no way this is outdated especially when comparing an M3. Like I said before, much better looking, much better sounding, and much more torque.
@AdrianC12345 example: 2:45. this car is good but not so much for the price. you can get a 2012 porsche 911 carrera s for about 110 grand fully hooked up and it can get from 0-60 mph in 3.9 seconds ! again, the center console looks like a center console for a 2002 mercedes e320. For some reason Maserati doesn't want to update it for some reason. I hate the M3's interior as well. This car is just lacking in performance for its price.
It's true, where the Maserati lacks in 0-60 and handling, it certainly makes up for in the immediate "That guy must be really really rich" thought that pops into everyone's head as you pass them. The average Joe can't tell the difference between a GT3 and a Boxer S, but everyone knows that a Maserati means your livin the good life.
ok who the fuck cares which is faster maseratis fast maye faster and maybe not as fast idc you would buy this because of its looks and interior and that it is fast ( obiously other cars are faster but still) imagine how many girls youd get driving this.... :)
TheKidNamedRoland 1 week ago
All this guys down here have never take a corner on full throttle over 100mph and all are saying is this car is slow.. I had beaten a faggy R8 in a 3200gt Imagine what we could do in Gran Turismo MC.. Start "Driving" and save your opinions for later.. GTR?? 911?? Who is driving??? sure you don't..
absolutinspire 2 weeks ago
If your wife has trouble cumming or you have erection problems see this car while having sex
dreamerstays 1 month ago
Cue the sexy music
Chazz2100 1 month ago
If you're comparing a Mustang to a Maserati, you've totally missed the point. Terrific summary. "There may be faster and cheaper cars out there......"
chachachaheyheyhey 1 month ago
Ehhumm gtr lol jk
CakeS2k 2 months ago
slow and expensive. But I would buy it for the sound. lol
AnonymoussourceL0L 3 months ago
@AnonymoussourceL0L 0-60 4.5 (4.8 is just a manufactures clams. for ex. 911 turbo s does 0-60 in 2.7 sec, but manufactures claims 3.1 so same here) also 1/4 mie 12.4 sec. 187 mph (302 kmh) not bad! How is this SLOW!!!??? if you had this car u would beat 99.9% cars you would see around you! SO?? come on.... it is not a bugatti but it is a very fast car
JuveTube777 2 months ago
@JuveTube777 I can do 4.5 in a 29k Mustang GT or 4.8 in a 60K M3 or 2.5 in a 95k GTR. Point is, it is just too over priced for what it is. I know what you're saying, but here in Florida or at least where I live in Florida, the Maserati would be considered less of a stop and stare and more of an everyday kind of sports car. The performance just doesn't justify that $143k sticker.
AnonymoussourceL0L 2 months ago
@AnonymoussourceL0L btw, stock mustang gt 0-60 is more close to 4.8 - 5 m3 is not capable to reach 180mph or more and stock GTR 0-60 is somewhere 3 - 3.5 (engines are hand made and th performance varies) and yes, I see your point... performance of this maser is not worth of 140k but, Maserati is Maserati and ford, BMW or Nissan is you know. I've driven Mustang, which is hell of a fast car so is m3, but not faster than MC. for 140k, Maserati offers a real driving pleasure :)
JuveTube777 2 months ago
4.5 In a mustang?? How old are you.. you talk about the only fact that doesnt matter.. we are talking about "Grand Tourers" here. Imagine this.. Highway.. rain is over but the floor is wet.. suddenly a 250k aston martin db9 2010 gives you the lights.. you know you cant stand a chance but you try your best as aproaching to a subtle curve making a rev match downshift as you get ready to accelerate.. you fail ..TCS kicks in to avoid wheel spin.. the DB9 passes you but if you were in the maserati..
absolutinspire 2 weeks ago
@absolutinspire The first half I understood, but you lost me the second half. TCS kicks in on any car in the wet. But I would take the DB9 over the Maserati GT any day. I've seen reviews of Maserati GT's and I'm sorry, but their center consoles have 90s neon green lights, ugly plasticy buttons and design, and just over all a horrific arrangement of buttons just thrown into the car. At least the DB9 looks good, sounds good (Maybe not as nice), and has a wonderful interior.
AnonymoussourceL0L 2 weeks ago
they are not even THAT fast though lol
yagfob1 3 months ago
Aston Martin > Maserati IMO!
newera3443 3 months ago
You know what? You're not bad kid. Nice review
apunk015 3 months ago
Hey, they were in San Diego!!
maybach6536 3 months ago
i thought the mc-12 was the most expensive maserati you can buy??
zoomdirt2 3 months ago
This looks gorgeous, but it's over $100K more than a Mustang GT 5.0 that's just as fast and loud.
typhoon5000 3 months ago
i know for the price its not fast, but fuck its beautiful
TroyRx 3 months ago
Maserati is about exclusivity, not the best power and performance !!!
boricuas4669 3 months ago
i drove this car! so awesome! ...... in GT5 LOOOOL!
crimsoninred 3 months ago
What is up with the Gran Turismo's lack of power? I mean an M3 could easily beat it.
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause What's up with the M3's horrible engine note? Or the fact that it has a pitiful ammount of torque for a 4 liter V8? Or the fact that A Mustang can beat that? The simple answer is that no M3 will ever look as fantastic as this, or ever be this luxurious. Plus the M3 just sounds terrible and this doesn't
AdrianC12345 3 months ago 2
@AdrianC12345 the Maserati only looks fantastic from the front and the side. the rear end is decent but not as amazing as the front end. the interior is very outdated and as luxurious say a Ferrari. The only thing nice about the interior are the gauges, the paddle shifters, the leather, and maybe the steering wheel. the center stack and nav is very outdated. Plus, for the price, you expect this thing to do 0-60 in the low 4's. It is a luxury car with a sports car disguise.
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
@SuperMeatsause Interior very outdated? Then how do you compare the M3 to this? Or a Ferrari? Last time I checked the M3 was a good handling car with a decent interior which cost about 80K and the cheaperst Ferrari was over 200K and has an even worse nav system. Just look at the interior, there's no way this is outdated especially when comparing an M3. Like I said before, much better looking, much better sounding, and much more torque.
AdrianC12345 3 months ago
@AdrianC12345 example: 2:45. this car is good but not so much for the price. you can get a 2012 porsche 911 carrera s for about 110 grand fully hooked up and it can get from 0-60 mph in 3.9 seconds ! again, the center console looks like a center console for a 2002 mercedes e320. For some reason Maserati doesn't want to update it for some reason. I hate the M3's interior as well. This car is just lacking in performance for its price.
SuperMeatsause 3 months ago
Buy the Porsche for performance
Buy the Maserati for the beauty
blackoutsummer 3 months ago
I would pick the Aston in a heartbeat.
SuppahShinyyCheerios 3 months ago
Sex on wheels
Jeeves441 3 months ago
My friends dad has a Maserati GT, DBS, 7 series, mercedese SUV(what eve it is), and a lincoln navigator
drake123josh 3 months ago
sexy
Slacking02 3 months ago
I wish porsche made their front lights look cooler
trevmania19 3 months ago
FUCK YEAH I UNDERSTOOD THE JOE WALSH ALLUSION
rocketballa4life 3 months ago
I want to trade my easy button in for a sport button.
ericplloyd 3 months ago
Let someone else buy it, go bankrupt, and then you can buy it at a big discount.
oilhammer04 3 months ago
Tesla is better
KyleTVProductions 3 months ago
kubang in vietnamese means black dick.
ElitePioneer 3 months ago
........ WOW! Beautiful
dundermiflin892 3 months ago
It's true, where the Maserati lacks in 0-60 and handling, it certainly makes up for in the immediate "That guy must be really really rich" thought that pops into everyone's head as you pass them. The average Joe can't tell the difference between a GT3 and a Boxer S, but everyone knows that a Maserati means your livin the good life.
nexorabolis 3 months ago
i dont care if I loose some stability in turns, id love to drop the top on the convertible and just listen to that engine / exhaust
jerrry13157 3 months ago
Porsche 911 Turbo S over those cars any day
timtime88 3 months ago
oh man, that joe walsh reference had me wailin'. Very well placed. now i cant get it out of my head. Lifes been good.
bajabusta 3 months ago
i'd take a maserati over an aston any day of the week.
wolftothegrave 3 months ago
wait 3 years and get this used for a huge discount.
frozencanuckreviews 3 months ago 4
@frozencanuckreviews good luck
aarikc17 3 months ago
@aarikc17 Thanks, but i have a plan. Win the lottery.
frozencanuckreviews 3 months ago
i want the convertible so much ¡¡¡
robie911 3 months ago
but porsche looks ugly
jere2511 3 months ago 28
@jere2511 Porsches look great. Not as gorgeous as the Maseratis of course, but still awesome
ratmtbola 3 months ago
@jere2511 Ugly is in the eye of the beholder. Subscribe! :)
ForeverFlame88 13 hours ago
great review. the MC coupe looks great but i'll buy the Aston Martin v8 vantage if i had that kind of money
utubeyaw 3 months ago
I conquered.
HaroandHalo 3 months ago
I saw
HaroandHalo 3 months ago
I came
Kirbynessness 3 months ago 33
@Kirbynessness Neither fornicators nor liars nor adulterers nor the abominable shall inherit the kingdom of God. Subscribe! :)
ForeverFlame88 13 hours ago