With the musical coming to Broadway, I could see a remake if it picks up and renews interest. It all has to do with how much they do beyond translation...I still think Tanz der Vampire would have been so much more popular without the "Americanization" they tried to do.
DeWinter's wife could be Diane Kruger; they look almost identical to me.
yeah... i should have read some comments first, before i post. apparently, the shot thing is very well known. yes... he's a murderer. she goes crazy in the second book Titled "Mrs. Dewinter"
you know, if she had asked more questions and stopped being so ignorantly silent, she might have avoided so much!
also...in the book. Maxim Shot rebecca and killed her intentionally. I don't blame him, rebecca provoked him, and as we hear at the end, with good reason.
These are the moments of the film that the 2nd Mrs. de Winter loses her intimidation of Danvers and Maxim and begins her transformation from a mousy shy girl into the strong(ish) woman Mrs. de Winter.
they changed the story because they tought that the audience would go very mad if maxim would have killed his wife without getting punished. (even if rebecca is a bitch)
@willobekid, due to the production code, Rebecca's death had to be changed to an accident, since a murderer could not go unpunished. The code was the movie moral police.
Read this book in high school. I bought it later, and still read it a lot. We also watched this movie in school. My teacher mentioned that the circumstances of Rebecca's death were changed for the movie, because there was a rule that a man could not murder his wife and go unpunished. So, it was changed to make it more accidental, otherwise, the movie could not have been made.
the syncing of the camerawork with Olivier's off-screen dialogue is so incredibly haunting! You can almost see the ghost of Rebecca get up and walk towards him as the camera pans - uttering those very words being re-spoken
I am not in any way a fan of Joan Fontaine, (love sister Olivia), she was well cast here. The original idea of the Olivier/Vivien Liegh "Rebecca" would have been disaster. I love Leigh, but she was a cyclone of power, even as Blanche Dubois in 'Streetcar', as a bipolar, former belle. She could never have the demure, plain, starry eyed naivete` that the nameless Mrs DeWinter, needs tho' she could have been Rebecca, from what we know of her. Leigh could just stand silent and still be amazing.
I remebering seeing this movie instantly falling in love with it so i read the book and I was BLOWN away by the fact that de Winter had actually shot Rebecca.
Why leave it out? because when this movie was made a studio guidline or other stated that if a person was guilty of a crime he had to be punished and as we all know Maxim got away with it.
@RachelG1979 The production code... Criminals couldn't get away with crimes, they had to be punished, thus if it was an accident, Maxim could get away with it according to the code.
In this version, his explanation is almost identical to Lord Rochester's to Jane. As beautiful as the photography & pathos of the film industry's portrayals are, there's just no substitute for reading the book.
Laurence Olivier and Joan Fontaine were incredible in this. It's a shame the Hays Code was around or they would have kept the ending faithful to the novel. Maxim does indeed kill Rebecca. But they had to change it for the movie.
"She told me all about herself". The implication in the book is that there might have been a lesbian aspect to Rebecca. Considered a daring secret at the time. Du Maurier herself was bisexual. "Everyone will think we're the perfect couple" Olivier and Vivien Leigh come to mind here. There was an element of acting for the sake of career in that marriage too. I love this film, great acting, and the book is even better.
Ugh...I was really impressed with the movie up to this point but it's lame that they changed this part. I guess they wanted to make Maxim more sympathetic.
2girlieheartedhate, in the book, yes, Maxim shot Rebecca through the heart. In the movie, however, Maxim said that Rebecca tripped and fell, hitting her head on a piece of ship's tackle.
If you think it's stupid, it's your opinion. The book left the ending very vague, in my opinion, while the movie gave you a crystal clear ending that was much easier to comprehend.
They had to change the plot because according to the Hollywood Production Code if Maxim had killed Rebecca, he would have to pay for his crime. In order to make sure Maxim didn't go to jail, like in the book, they made Rebecca's death look like an accident.
If they'd taken a chance and kept to the novel, the movie wouldn't of even been shown because it broke the Hollywood Production Code. I would rather see a movie that keeps as close to the novel as it could and a few plot changes that are executed correctly instead of not seeing one at all because it broke the code.
i think that it made for a more shocking plot twist that he didnt kill rebecca. i mean i assumed he was a killer at the point where he said he put her body on the boat, which was shocking. but it was even more shocking and albiet a bit relieving to find my assumptions were wrong.
this is a great monologue....sir laurence is just smashing. normally when i watch olivier, like in shakespeare, i'm thinking "omg this is such a great actor." but in this you're actually caught up in the character, he is unselfconsciously great and completely in character.
Apparently they changed the account of the death of Rebecca because Hollywood had a rule that a character could not get away unpunished with deliberately killing his wife -- so here he hits her and she falls and bangs her head on something, whereas in the book he shoots her
At 8.30 and on I usually feel as if Maxim is going to be hanged right that moment, especially when he is going to the exit followed by all these people...
@lordalessan WOAH WOAH WOAH. That is the most incorrect, ridiculous statement I have ever heard made of Laurence Olivier. Where, pray tell, did you hear/read such a horrible thing? Never in his life did he hate Vivien Leigh. In fact, she remained the only person he ever loved even after their divorce and her death. And she continued to love him as well. When she died, he would lock himself up in a dark room, watch her movies, and cry saying "That was it. That was love." Please check you sources.
@LexiixoxRoxx Umm Lexi, you gotta clue me in on this. If I made a comment like that, it must've been a long time ago because I can no longer remember what I said. After watching a documentary on Vivien Leigh and reading a biography on Laurence Olivier, I know that he did not hate his wife. However, he did grow tired of her fits of rage (due to her bipolar disorder) and affairs with Peter Finch and John Merrivale (who eventually became her companion).
@lordalessan I didn't notice the year, but it probably was quite long ago. I just wanted to establish that he never hated her. Au contraire, she was the love of his life and he never stopped thinking about her (lovingly I mean). Nor did she. Their love was unfortunately tragic. Well of course he was exhausted by her, but he didn't blame her for it nor was it her fault. And she never cheated on him with John Merivale...only Peter. But he cheated too so they're pretty even.
@illi10nis27 I couldnt see Ralph Fiennes do Maxim. Max is a handomse, manly sort and Ralph, is sensitive, pretty type although like Olivier, a great actor. Brother, Joseph, tho'? I might see, today, a Clive Owen (toned down a bit for this role) or Pierce Bronson, circa 10 yrs ago. Must be British tho'. No one comes to mind. You're right that some films cannot be remade..ala 'Wizard of Oz", GWTW, "It's a Wonderul Life" ++. A new Sistine would be unthinkable or new Pyramid, as are some films.
@illi10nis27 No. Executives are just devoid of the ability to take risks and make any of the countless potential original films knocking about the place.
I love Joan Fontaine. It's weird but she has a really expressive spine. I love her postures and her expressions. She really nailed the overwrought innocence of the character.
the book does say. Rebecca had many lovers. She'd tried to seduce Frank,and Giles(Beatrice's husband). She was also having an affair with her cousin Jack Favell.
At that exact point in the book - where she is described as telling him shocking things about herself, we are not told exactly what these are. But it does come out a bit later that she used to keep going to London to meet up with different men etc, so it seems probably that it is her promiscuity/unfaithfulness that is being referred to; although it might have been a bit more, we can't be sure
This is probably the least boring part of this movie.
SisterToSleepx 3 weeks ago
@msminiver93 her name is alix the author did gave her a name
TheHolidayShow1 1 month ago
Does anyone know what Joan Fontaine character's name is? I have read the book cover to cover and I don't remember ever seeing it.
oldfshndandlovnit 1 month ago
@oldfshndandlovnit The author of the book never gave her a name.
msminiver93 1 month ago
Hickcock was so brilliant. He's made Rebecca into a character so perfectly
sarah67act 3 months ago
Amazing
Cazxiro 3 months ago
OMG
HereORNowTODAY 4 months ago
With the musical coming to Broadway, I could see a remake if it picks up and renews interest. It all has to do with how much they do beyond translation...I still think Tanz der Vampire would have been so much more popular without the "Americanization" they tried to do.
DeWinter's wife could be Diane Kruger; they look almost identical to me.
humansRpepul2 6 months ago
If we HAD to remake Rebecca,
I'd pick Winona Ryder as Maxims wife (with the same hair length)
Ralf Fiennes as Maxim - though I wouldn't mind Johnny Depp playing this role.
a young Susan Sarandon as Mrs. Danvers
but nobody can compare these to the original actors in rebecca. fullstop.
TheFirstClassedFreak 6 months ago
4:40 - Turns out Max is an Alanis Morissette fan.
DMTH85 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3:20 KABOOM!!! - - - The End....
DMTH85 6 months ago
Comment removed
DMTH85 6 months ago
Comment removed
DMTH85 6 months ago
...in the book, diddn't he actually kill Rebecca? It's been a while since I last read it.
AnnaKmid 6 months ago
Rebecca NEVER EVER had one single sign of positive emotions!! She was only born of the negative!!
Scoutpower1 7 months ago
Comment removed
Scoutpower1 7 months ago
whoah really 4:00-4:40 is the creepiest ever! watching it at 2am is really a bad idea!
zenith0000006 7 months ago
This is sooo twisted!
rebachick94 10 months ago
yeah... i should have read some comments first, before i post. apparently, the shot thing is very well known. yes... he's a murderer. she goes crazy in the second book Titled "Mrs. Dewinter"
MrShaun42088 10 months ago
you know, if she had asked more questions and stopped being so ignorantly silent, she might have avoided so much!
also...in the book. Maxim Shot rebecca and killed her intentionally. I don't blame him, rebecca provoked him, and as we hear at the end, with good reason.
MrShaun42088 10 months ago
Laurence Olivier is fantastic in this role :)
But when I was reading the book, I always pictured Hugh Dancy as Maxim, even though I'm not such a fan of his :/
xcitric 1 year ago
These are the moments of the film that the 2nd Mrs. de Winter loses her intimidation of Danvers and Maxim and begins her transformation from a mousy shy girl into the strong(ish) woman Mrs. de Winter.
lukebccb 1 year ago
they changed the story because they tought that the audience would go very mad if maxim would have killed his wife without getting punished. (even if rebecca is a bitch)
(sorry for my english)
Ykishaa 1 year ago 2
AT 5;03 Max said he slaped Rebecca and she fell and struck her and she was dead. In the book he shot her. Why was the story changed
willobekid 1 year ago
@willobekid, due to the production code, Rebecca's death had to be changed to an accident, since a murderer could not go unpunished. The code was the movie moral police.
Muirmaiden 11 months ago
he said rebecca told him things he would never repeat after they were married. was probably about her bisexuality and sex addiction
ednuk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ednuk And much much worse.
TheSkylur44 11 months ago
Read this book in high school. I bought it later, and still read it a lot. We also watched this movie in school. My teacher mentioned that the circumstances of Rebecca's death were changed for the movie, because there was a rule that a man could not murder his wife and go unpunished. So, it was changed to make it more accidental, otherwise, the movie could not have been made.
Eternity29 1 year ago
Book is amazing as well it sooooooo good especially toward the end :D
Belindaa952 1 year ago
the syncing of the camerawork with Olivier's off-screen dialogue is so incredibly haunting! You can almost see the ghost of Rebecca get up and walk towards him as the camera pans - uttering those very words being re-spoken
BaremyiahZ 1 year ago
In the book it wasnt an accedent, he shot her through the heart
tornadoshot 1 year ago
@tornadoshot I can't figure out why they would have changed that
PengWinOne 1 year ago
@PengWinOne i know, i thought it was better the way it was.. i guess hitchcock felt he might turn into a antagonist if it was on purpose
tornadoshot 1 year ago
I am not in any way a fan of Joan Fontaine, (love sister Olivia), she was well cast here. The original idea of the Olivier/Vivien Liegh "Rebecca" would have been disaster. I love Leigh, but she was a cyclone of power, even as Blanche Dubois in 'Streetcar', as a bipolar, former belle. She could never have the demure, plain, starry eyed naivete` that the nameless Mrs DeWinter, needs tho' she could have been Rebecca, from what we know of her. Leigh could just stand silent and still be amazing.
sarmadasco 1 year ago
Well, IMO Laurence Olivier is great, but for me this movie is all about Joan Fontaine. Of course, to each his own.
dinasztie 1 year ago 2
This movie was amazing than "Notorious" which is also an Hitchcock movie after 6 years (1946).
ajquioc 1 year ago
Colonel Julian : Old Boy network personified.
RichardHell1959 1 year ago
I remebering seeing this movie instantly falling in love with it so i read the book and I was BLOWN away by the fact that de Winter had actually shot Rebecca.
Why leave it out? because when this movie was made a studio guidline or other stated that if a person was guilty of a crime he had to be punished and as we all know Maxim got away with it.
RachelG1979 1 year ago
@RachelG1979 The production code... Criminals couldn't get away with crimes, they had to be punished, thus if it was an accident, Maxim could get away with it according to the code.
rosesfororion 1 year ago
So in the novel what happened to Mr de winter?
saxophone2007 1 year ago
In this version, his explanation is almost identical to Lord Rochester's to Jane. As beautiful as the photography & pathos of the film industry's portrayals are, there's just no substitute for reading the book.
auroraslaugh 1 year ago 3
alfred hitchcock was brilliant
MusicVideosRemake 1 year ago 4
I'm enthralled with this movie.
africanzionflo 1 year ago 4
Both Olivier and Fontaine are sensational!!!!
susannebass 1 year ago 18
7.33 Rebecca's on the phone and wants a word :D
karyn13house 1 year ago
WOW.
susuwatari007 1 year ago
Comment removed
schizophrantic 2 years ago
Does it make sense that he's supposedly always trying to forget Rebecca, yet he returned to Monte Carlo, where he went with her on his honeymoon?
lorianne03 2 years ago 3
BRILLIANT!
jolandasterbloem 2 years ago 3
Laurence Olivier and Joan Fontaine were incredible in this. It's a shame the Hays Code was around or they would have kept the ending faithful to the novel. Maxim does indeed kill Rebecca. But they had to change it for the movie.
LexiixoxRoxx 2 years ago 16
Are they insinuating Rebecca had relations with both men and women?
goombabear 2 years ago 5
No, why?
LexiixoxRoxx 2 years ago
in the book, maxim shot rebecca...no tripping involved.
blackunicornstudios 2 years ago 4
Were Rebecca and Flavel having a relationship?? Is that not incestuous seeing as they're cousins?? Or are they not first cousins?
DiamondAngel44 2 years ago
First cousins.
She was a special kind of person.
Artemis6769 2 years ago
the book was awesome, i love how Rebbecca is portrayed, I wish they talked more about her,
SalamanderNatsu 2 years ago 3
I wish they give her a flashback part in the movie.
Artemis6769 2 years ago 4
"She told me all about herself". The implication in the book is that there might have been a lesbian aspect to Rebecca. Considered a daring secret at the time. Du Maurier herself was bisexual. "Everyone will think we're the perfect couple" Olivier and Vivien Leigh come to mind here. There was an element of acting for the sake of career in that marriage too. I love this film, great acting, and the book is even better.
zzheavensdoor 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheKearnsmike 2 years ago
All it really does is make him look like an idiot because he made himself look guilty when he did nothing wrong.
SallieSimpson 2 years ago
Ugh...I was really impressed with the movie up to this point but it's lame that they changed this part. I guess they wanted to make Maxim more sympathetic.
SallieSimpson 2 years ago
So Rebecca went on a ego trip basically!
So manipulative
ThePeeWee2009 2 years ago
2girlieheartedhate, in the book, yes, Maxim shot Rebecca through the heart. In the movie, however, Maxim said that Rebecca tripped and fell, hitting her head on a piece of ship's tackle.
theatrecrazy07 2 years ago 2
This is stupid.
The book was much more interesting.
Artemis6769 2 years ago
If you think it's stupid, it's your opinion. The book left the ending very vague, in my opinion, while the movie gave you a crystal clear ending that was much easier to comprehend.
theatrecrazy07 2 years ago
Yes, but that's the beauty of it.
Not knowing exactly and having the ability to fabricate what happened at the end.
I just don't see the point in changing the defining plot twist and numerous aspects of the novel.
Artemis6769 2 years ago
They had to change the plot because according to the Hollywood Production Code if Maxim had killed Rebecca, he would have to pay for his crime. In order to make sure Maxim didn't go to jail, like in the book, they made Rebecca's death look like an accident.
theatrecrazy07 2 years ago
Stiil, I respect a movie and director that takes chances and keeps to the novel rather than degrading their work to keep with society's standards.
Artemis6769 2 years ago
If they'd taken a chance and kept to the novel, the movie wouldn't of even been shown because it broke the Hollywood Production Code. I would rather see a movie that keeps as close to the novel as it could and a few plot changes that are executed correctly instead of not seeing one at all because it broke the code.
theatrecrazy07 2 years ago 5
I understand what you're saying, but I would rather see a movie create controversy than be medicore because it really doesn't make sense.
Artemis6769 2 years ago
i think that it made for a more shocking plot twist that he didnt kill rebecca. i mean i assumed he was a killer at the point where he said he put her body on the boat, which was shocking. but it was even more shocking and albiet a bit relieving to find my assumptions were wrong.
crownme555 2 years ago 4
the ending may have been vague, but the book was waaaay better.
ennagirl31 2 years ago
I agree.
Artemis6769 2 years ago
ah-mazing but he DID kill her right? shot her through the heart?
2girlieheartedHATE 2 years ago
this is a great monologue....sir laurence is just smashing. normally when i watch olivier, like in shakespeare, i'm thinking "omg this is such a great actor." but in this you're actually caught up in the character, he is unselfconsciously great and completely in character.
bookishmuch 2 years ago 46
I agree completely. Olivier is one of my favorite actors and in this movie, it clearly shows why. :D
theatrecrazy07 2 years ago
this book/movie is really about marriage, not just a great yarn with a dashing leading man...
bookishmuch 2 years ago
Tom Hardy just played Heathcliff. Think he would make a good Maxim..
rachel7036 2 years ago
1997 remake, with Charles Dance, is a very good too
helefer 2 years ago
read pages 262 forward, it is all there,
maidmoira 2 years ago
Apparently they changed the account of the death of Rebecca because Hollywood had a rule that a character could not get away unpunished with deliberately killing his wife -- so here he hits her and she falls and bangs her head on something, whereas in the book he shoots her
orlando098 3 years ago 9
At 8.30 and on I usually feel as if Maxim is going to be hanged right that moment, especially when he is going to the exit followed by all these people...
HappyChild1989 3 years ago
I could definitely imagine Vivien Leigh as Rebecca! Perfectly Wicked~
bookhead92 3 years ago
My top 3 pick as Rebecca:
1.)Vivien Leigh (Olivier would hate his wife later years because of her bipolar disoder).
2.)Elizabeth Taylor (Ofcourse, she was only 8 at that time)
3.) Ava Gardner
lordalessan 3 years ago 2
Good choices!
Tigerlilym2 2 years ago
@lordalessan WOAH WOAH WOAH. That is the most incorrect, ridiculous statement I have ever heard made of Laurence Olivier. Where, pray tell, did you hear/read such a horrible thing? Never in his life did he hate Vivien Leigh. In fact, she remained the only person he ever loved even after their divorce and her death. And she continued to love him as well. When she died, he would lock himself up in a dark room, watch her movies, and cry saying "That was it. That was love." Please check you sources.
LexiixoxRoxx 8 months ago
@LexiixoxRoxx Umm Lexi, you gotta clue me in on this. If I made a comment like that, it must've been a long time ago because I can no longer remember what I said. After watching a documentary on Vivien Leigh and reading a biography on Laurence Olivier, I know that he did not hate his wife. However, he did grow tired of her fits of rage (due to her bipolar disorder) and affairs with Peter Finch and John Merrivale (who eventually became her companion).
lordalessan 8 months ago
@lordalessan I didn't notice the year, but it probably was quite long ago. I just wanted to establish that he never hated her. Au contraire, she was the love of his life and he never stopped thinking about her (lovingly I mean). Nor did she. Their love was unfortunately tragic. Well of course he was exhausted by her, but he didn't blame her for it nor was it her fault. And she never cheated on him with John Merivale...only Peter. But he cheated too so they're pretty even.
LexiixoxRoxx 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this movie needs to be remade <3
jstardude 3 years ago
No it doesn't.
velocikat 3 years ago 9
I agree, unfortunately Universal is remaking this with Ralph Fiennes and Juliet Rylance. Ugh!
iluvdesmond 3 years ago 8
The world is ending....
LickMyCuntMoFo 2 years ago
WHAT?!!! I can see Ralph Fiennes as Maxim but NO. No one can be as great as Laurence Olivier.
Sigh...are we so void of creativity that we have to remake the classics??
illi10nis27 2 years ago 62
not as great as Jeremy Brett....
hysope5 2 years ago
No one can ever compare with Laurence Olivier but I am curious to see how the remake will be especially since they picked Ralph Fiennes as Maxim.
theatrecrazy07 2 years ago
Yes, sometimes remakes SUCKS!! But Liam Neeson would be slight better than Ralph Fiennes.
ajquioc 1 year ago
@illi10nis27 I couldnt see Ralph Fiennes do Maxim. Max is a handomse, manly sort and Ralph, is sensitive, pretty type although like Olivier, a great actor. Brother, Joseph, tho'? I might see, today, a Clive Owen (toned down a bit for this role) or Pierce Bronson, circa 10 yrs ago. Must be British tho'. No one comes to mind. You're right that some films cannot be remade..ala 'Wizard of Oz", GWTW, "It's a Wonderul Life" ++. A new Sistine would be unthinkable or new Pyramid, as are some films.
sarmadasco 1 year ago
@illi10nis27 No. Executives are just devoid of the ability to take risks and make any of the countless potential original films knocking about the place.
sausagedogmcgee 1 year ago
@illi10nis27 I would actually love to see Fiennes in this part. He would be fantastic but of course, no one can ever replace Olivier.
TheSkylur44 11 months ago
Oh dear god no. That is a truly awful piece of news.
amazinglyace 2 years ago 3
I agree.
Labryschick 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God this Mrs de Winter is inspid, Maxim is a woos and Mrs D is a freak. I give up.
shibamatachick 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a boring movie
Chikalita2 3 years ago
@Chikalita,,,What poor taste you have.
504Diva 3 years ago 12
what an ugly name
icrappedmynappy 3 years ago
What a pity! why part 10 not available?
fenxian1 3 years ago
Part 10 is available.
Addicted890189 3 years ago
"YOU DIDNT LOVE HER!YOU DIDNT LOVE HER"
xD
cassanovadamsle 3 years ago 11
I love Joan Fontaine. It's weird but she has a really expressive spine. I love her postures and her expressions. She really nailed the overwrought innocence of the character.
magpiepeck 4 years ago 15
Comment removed
ginafaloola 4 years ago
I 'am a fan of hers but can see how Olivia would be better at the role.
scarlett24ca 4 years ago 2
i dont agree
Bergman90 3 years ago
Well, I hate Joan Crawford myself. But she didn't play in Rebecca, it was Joan Fontaine.
Niouni 4 years ago 16
whoops my bad;)Thanks for clarifying.
scarlett24ca 3 years ago
She's Joan Fontaine. Not Joan Crawford XD
I would have seen more Olivia de Havilland too, for this role... the book suggest a character nearer to her.
ParideArduenna 3 years ago 3
honey, her name isn't joan crawford, its joan fontaine.her eyebrows are just part of her character
Bergman90 3 years ago 4
Read the book.
Rosebud04 4 years ago
The book doesn't say.
cicadachimera 4 years ago
it does say. Rebecca was shameless slut, im sorry for expression:p
sugarfreedom 4 years ago 5
which page?
cicadachimera 4 years ago
very true, a high class slut
ihateskirts 3 years ago 2
I wonder what Rebecca told Maxim, "things I wouldn't tell a living soul"? I wonder?
lshield1 4 years ago 6
the book does say. Rebecca had many lovers. She'd tried to seduce Frank,and Giles(Beatrice's husband). She was also having an affair with her cousin Jack Favell.
Enchant0524 3 years ago 5
At that exact point in the book - where she is described as telling him shocking things about herself, we are not told exactly what these are. But it does come out a bit later that she used to keep going to London to meet up with different men etc, so it seems probably that it is her promiscuity/unfaithfulness that is being referred to; although it might have been a bit more, we can't be sure
orlando098 3 years ago 2
in fact the book doesn't tell us more than the film here
orlando098 3 years ago
Thanks!
lshield1 3 years ago
I think she might have been gay or bi, or possibly into something with her cousin Favell.
Nicecatholicgirl 2 years ago 4