Added: 10 months ago
From: DorkShelfdotCom
Views: 10,520
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why is Maleficent on the wall to the left! I think it's her!

  • i wish the interviewer was better.

  • the man's a genius , the entertainment he provides is worth much more then any starwars prequal

  • @Ikkepop It's spelled this way: prequel, with an "e". Also, it's "than" not "then". And *this* is what you consider to be "genius"? Get some fucking standards. And also learn how to spell. 

  • @amaxamon We fought a war in the 40's against grammar Nazis such as yourself.

  • @amaxamon does it look like i give fuck ? if so i'm terribly sorry that i made it seem that way

  • Mike's so nervous during interviews.

  • @squamish4244 if he cut out the rape and pedophile jokes it wouldnt be funny it would just be an old guy talking about a bad fucking movie, the pedophile jokes are the best parts!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D Time to go to the refrigerator!!! You want some pizza roles

  • what a douchebag, he didn't even know harry's name.

  • @KakkoiiSasuke That and he timed the video to 9:11 

  • @teamstarpug LOL genius.

  • I hope Mike enjoyed doing the Crystal Skull review...as excited as I am to see it I hope he didn't feel completely pressured to do it...

  • @Harvest8888 It did feel kind of forced.

  • This interviewer is stressing me out. Stop waving your hands and talking like your on speed.

  • way to get his name wrong.

  • A live show would be awesome!!

  • @Cruzman3609 What do you mean? Plinkett is his granfather. He makes the videos in his creepy house and sends them in the mail to Mike on VHS tapes together with some pizza rolls.

  • Mike is a fucking genius!

  • woo NIN!

  • this man is my new hero

  • @SethHesio i just thought that it was just totally unrealistic and the plot was-- well, its like there was no plot. its just like the director tried to make the character likeable but its just too impossible because your ability to like is completely clouded by the factor of unrealistic crap. ive got no problem with jim carrey, just the movie

  • He seems nervous :/

  • mike/harry is a genius.he should review the truman show. it was a load of BULLSHIT

  • @LookOutForDetoxx lmao.... what beef do you have with The Truman Show? I haven't even thought of that movie for like five years lol.

  • on Half in the bag they say "no one cares if someone kills another lame ass internet critic" Or something to that effect......I wonder if they meant this useless interviewer cunt?

  • @Cruzman3609 He seems really nice too. It's hard to believe he got this amazing sense of dark, twisted and morbid humour. Watch Half in the Bag where he reviews movies with friend and colleague Jay Bauman if you haven't already.

  • Hairy Ass Plinkett

  • We all owe a debt to the horrible mess of Star Trek Generations, since because of its awfulness, we all now know of Mike Stoklasa.

    Completely worth it!

  • Could those two guys have been any more uncomfortable with each other???

  • Awe man. My parents went to Eau Claire to visit a friend. I could have gone and seen the live viewing. Dammit!

  • Harry S. Plinkett... hm, Hairy Ass Plinket.

  • Does anyone knows what is the name of the font used in the opening title?

  • Oh Mike, us folks at the RLM message boards know you're doing Indy 4 ;)

  • He didn't get him to say "protagonist"

  • Since he won't review the Original Trilogy, I did it for him - but if you think they're perfect, think again. Turns out, they're full of as many plotholes as the Prequels. And in some cases, even more.

  • @pacificimporters

    1) Because your reviews are really just a boring list of points, you can't really say "you did it for him".

    2) Plinkett did a favorable review of Star Trek XI, while pointing out weaknesses and plotholes. If he did one of the OT, it probably would be just the same.

    3) Plot holes and retcons aside, the OT had something very significant the PT did not - a lucid character constellation with clear motivations and characterizations.

    There were many contrivances in the plot...

  • @pacificimporters

    ... but hardly ever was the viewer left wondering what a group or organizations wants, why a certain battle is fought (or who's the good and bad guys), or why a certain character does something instead of the other.

    There were some cases like Leia shrugging off the "tracking", or some cases where Luke didn't use the force in ROTJ, but those were rather exceptions than the rule.

    So the OT had the basics down and had some sloppy plot points thrown in...

  • @pacificimporters

    ... while the PT failed with the basics, failed to connect or appeal with the characters (not completely, but way too much), and had some silly plotholes on top of that, as well.

    So no, no symmetry whatsoever.

  • @pacificimporters

    Why do you try to push your boring ass videos everywhere?

    Your videos are shit anyway, that's why no one watches them. You can't accept the fact the PT is terrible you have to say "The OT is just as bad or worse" get a fucking life asshole.

  • He IS reviewing Indy 4 :D

  • @twooffour and The Last Airbender, hopefully

  • Brilliant interviewer!

  • @AwesomeCoasters Yea definantly

  • I don't think I've ever seen anyone use a shotgun as a handheld before.

    Well, whatever works for you, buddy.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more