There is some confusion here over why the LM ascent stage was short fuelled.
This stage was designed to take off from the moons surface so it had to lift against one sixth earth gravity.
On the 10 mission it was tested in Lunar orbit and separated up to 90 miles from the command module. To close the gap again it simply did not need the fuel and the weight saving meant that other phases of the mission had extra margins to work in.
Remember this was still untried territory back then.
Funny story: since Apollo 10 was going to come as close as man had ever come to the Moon (8 miles from the Lunar surface), NASA made sure the LM was short fueled, so that if the astronauts became tempted to make a manned Lunar landing, they wouldn't be able to leave!
@BarackSays This story is fun but not quite accurate. That LM was too heavy to get off the Moon. The short fuel was the only way to balance the weight to the expected landing configuration.
APOLLO FUN FACTS: According to the 2001 Guinness World Records, Apollo 10 set the record for the highest speed attained by a manned vehicle at 39,897 km/h (11.08 km/s or 24,791 mph) during the return from the Moon on May 26, 1969.
Apollo 10 was the fourth manned mission in the Apollo programme. The mission included the second crew to orbit the Moon, and the test of the lunar module in lunar orbit. The module came to within 15.6 km of the lunar surface during practice manoeuvers.
according to the research ,the materials used in the design of the spacecraft are sufficient to block Enough harmful radiation to make it safe . The astronauts all wore dosimeters that were checked periodically during missions . And no it was not lead . Some poly type materials block the radiation sufficiently enough . Sure its not lead , but it was enough except in the case of solar flares which they were always watching for and had some lead time to adjust for.
All these conspiracy theorists make me laugh. All the so called "facts" that BBC showed have all been properly explained. I like the one about lethal radiation. The Van Allen Belts are not completely encompassing the earth, they are thicker in places than others. They just had to travel through the thinnest layer.
@vecomm101 What protected the astronauts from the hard solar radiation once they were BEYOND the Van Allen Belt?....NOT, at which point did they go through the Van Allen Belt.
400,000 people worked on the Apollo program,find one that says we faked it,you won't.There are six LM descent stage's sitting on the moon and one that crashed on purpose from apollo 10,for all to see.
the only reason why apollo 10 could not land was that the ascent stage was intentionally short fueled. NASA feared that the crew would attempt a landing if they had the opportunity.
I don't know if that's true, but I do know the LM used on Apollo was too heavy - the ascent stage would not have been able to lift them back into orbit.
LM-5 ("Eagle") was the first LM capable of landing on the Moon and returning to orbit, after massive efforts by Grumman to lose weight.
that may be so. I got the short fueled info from the documentary "in the shadow of the moon" where Gene Cernan himself states that the fuel tanks on the ascent stage was short fueled to make sure that the crew did not attempt a landing
@NEAVFXMEDIA That was an inside joke to highlight the "go-fever" attitude of this most experienced of crews (5 previous flights among the crewmembers).
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
does anyone have the tape where Walter Cronkite figured that something had caused Apollo 10 to fail? there was a little longer gap of silence coming around the back of the moon.. and Walter stuck his foot in it. no one seems to want to recall when the great walter screwed up.
@josephdupont The resumption of communcations following the ionization blackout of re-entry was delayed on Gemini 6 - that is what you are referring to. Everything in Apollo 10 outside of a misplaced switch setting at LM staging and issues with LM-CSM tunnel pressure was absolutely textbook.
As i said on a couple of Moon landing video. The Landing on the moon is like god. I dont beleive in god but i do beleive it do good things to people sometime. Lunar landing i beleive it happen and strongly but i beleive too that it was a good thing for mankind. So indeed of trying to teach people that its a hoax why dont you just enjoy what it did for humanity? Think at that all of you moon hoax beleivers.
You obviously didnt get my point, I don't believe in god and there is no evidence of it, but for god, some people help poor people, sick childrens etc so it do good somewhere even if we have no proof it exist? And as the moon landing did, science took giant leap with the moon landing and its only a good thing for humanity!
Maybe I missed the part where you said you do believe we landed on the moon. But it shouldn't be an act of faith, anyone with a background in science realized we went. I think I'm with you now.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Everybody is finally seeing the evidence that the moon missions were faked thanks to the internet. There's a partial summary of the hoax evidence in post #1 of this thread below.
3W's (dot) rushlimbaughforum (dot) com/never-went-the-moon-t2782 (dot) html
try telling that to tom stafford.He may be an old man but he can still kick your but.I have talked to him about the hoax fools.He just laghes and says not to worry when someone does go back to the moon,they will find our old spacecraft sitting there.have a wonderfull but dull life.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Instead of talking in generalities, why don't you address the evidence? Tell us why the corner of Collins' jacket behaves the way it does in the clip below.
/watch?v=I_CMgqitv98
(50 second mark)
Here's real zero-G.
/watch?v=TejsnPThmd4
That Apollo footage was taken in gravity. The pro-Apollo person who made the video refuses to comment on this in the comment section of the video.
Everybody is finally seeing evidence of morons on youtube thanks to the Internet. This hoax variant that runs throughout Youtube regarding NASA moon landings is hilarious beyond description. The fact that you can get people to believe anything is proven on a daily basis here. Without photoshop and advances in film editing these people would be in a basement somewhere wearing out tapes of Beatles and Led Zeppelin cuts being played backwards for secret and hidden messages. What a world....
@Sam13lfc yea dude those guys from mythbusters proved you couldn't fake going to the moon. they tried to fake going to the moon. they just didn't succeed so that prove we went to the moon. right. well i think they proved they could go to the moon wait a minuet they didn't go to the moon, so they faked not going was real and that you could not fake it. wait . im not sure they proved it was real by proving they could not fake it. why were they doing a show about the moon anyway. mythbusters suck
@bullshitdetective1 So those giant rockets taking off, which people saw in person, and those men falling from the sky 17 times, which people saw in person, are fake? What were they greenscreening the entire fucking sky infront of the live audience? No one ever proved it was fake, because it was real. As I said, all the ''evidence'' for the hoax theory has been proved to be bullshit.
Man, I'm better at your job than you Mr Bullshit Detective.
@Sam13lfc not to be mean but look at apollo 1 tape NASA said their suites were able to withstand heat over 125 degrees then why did they die from earth fire?
Amazing images. Apollo project was the greatest engineering project in the history of humanity.
My respect to American engineers and scientists !
smtech 1 week ago
The crew of Apollo 1 didn't die from burns they were asphyxiated from the smoke
Ludwigcaged411 1 month ago
because it wasn't a normal fire, it was in pure oxygen, they were made to withstand heat not to be set directly onto a fucking BBQ man, wake up.
hitcan79 2 months ago
do i know you? hahahaahaa! your just jealous maybe the neocons are PURE EVIL
DannySmith300 2 months ago
what I can say to Apollo 10 LM crew ? ALMOST DONE lol :)
Dollar1998 3 months ago
There is incontrovertible evidence that all the hoax theories have been developed in the bedrooms of 40-something men living with their mothers.
XPLAlN 3 months ago
There is some confusion here over why the LM ascent stage was short fuelled.
This stage was designed to take off from the moons surface so it had to lift against one sixth earth gravity.
On the 10 mission it was tested in Lunar orbit and separated up to 90 miles from the command module. To close the gap again it simply did not need the fuel and the weight saving meant that other phases of the mission had extra margins to work in.
Remember this was still untried territory back then.
TheSpiritof1969 4 months ago
american astronauts are heros
GAPDA 5 months ago
going to visit the actual command module tomorrow :D
TheXboxed 6 months ago
Where can I find the music?
igetakickoutofyou 7 months ago
about a good 80% of these "hoaxers" are from the Flat Earth society!
SuperTennis3 8 months ago
Funny story: since Apollo 10 was going to come as close as man had ever come to the Moon (8 miles from the Lunar surface), NASA made sure the LM was short fueled, so that if the astronauts became tempted to make a manned Lunar landing, they wouldn't be able to leave!
BarackSays 11 months ago
@BarackSays This story is fun but not quite accurate. That LM was too heavy to get off the Moon. The short fuel was the only way to balance the weight to the expected landing configuration.
dirac33 9 months ago
APOLLO FUN FACTS: According to the 2001 Guinness World Records, Apollo 10 set the record for the highest speed attained by a manned vehicle at 39,897 km/h (11.08 km/s or 24,791 mph) during the return from the Moon on May 26, 1969.
Apollo 10 was the fourth manned mission in the Apollo programme. The mission included the second crew to orbit the Moon, and the test of the lunar module in lunar orbit. The module came to within 15.6 km of the lunar surface during practice manoeuvers.
Synthetrix 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The moon missions were faked in a studio. Here's a link to some of the evidence.
3W's (dot) spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Cosmored2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The moon missions were faked in a studio. Here's a link to some of the evidence.
3W's (dot) spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Cosmored2 1 year ago
according to the research ,the materials used in the design of the spacecraft are sufficient to block Enough harmful radiation to make it safe . The astronauts all wore dosimeters that were checked periodically during missions . And no it was not lead . Some poly type materials block the radiation sufficiently enough . Sure its not lead , but it was enough except in the case of solar flares which they were always watching for and had some lead time to adjust for.
vecomm101 1 year ago
All these conspiracy theorists make me laugh. All the so called "facts" that BBC showed have all been properly explained. I like the one about lethal radiation. The Van Allen Belts are not completely encompassing the earth, they are thicker in places than others. They just had to travel through the thinnest layer.
vecomm101 1 year ago
@vecomm101 What protected the astronauts from the hard solar radiation once they were BEYOND the Van Allen Belt?....NOT, at which point did they go through the Van Allen Belt.
signalrecieved 1 year ago
@signalrecieved Duh! Superman protected them! Are you new?
dirac33 9 months ago
400,000 people worked on the Apollo program,find one that says we faked it,you won't.There are six LM descent stage's sitting on the moon and one that crashed on purpose from apollo 10,for all to see.
inagod 1 year ago 4
Must have been frustrating for those guys to be so close to the moon but not be able to land.
dsfddsgh 1 year ago
Does anybody know the music from the second half?
hunterhalo2 1 year ago
I love this stuff. I remember watching this flight on TV with my family. It was so exciting.
imtxsmoke 1 year ago
all hoaxers must fucking die!
guitarnashelter 1 year ago 2
it is said that "ofc they went to the moon, but some pictures are made on a studio"
mKaelus 1 year ago
the only reason why apollo 10 could not land was that the ascent stage was intentionally short fueled. NASA feared that the crew would attempt a landing if they had the opportunity.
joachim2464 2 years ago
I don't know if that's true, but I do know the LM used on Apollo was too heavy - the ascent stage would not have been able to lift them back into orbit.
LM-5 ("Eagle") was the first LM capable of landing on the Moon and returning to orbit, after massive efforts by Grumman to lose weight.
qarnos 1 year ago
that may be so. I got the short fueled info from the documentary "in the shadow of the moon" where Gene Cernan himself states that the fuel tanks on the ascent stage was short fueled to make sure that the crew did not attempt a landing
NEAVFXMEDIA 1 year ago
@NEAVFXMEDIA That was an inside joke to highlight the "go-fever" attitude of this most experienced of crews (5 previous flights among the crewmembers).
dirac33 9 months ago
I think it's more likely that it was underfueled because of the weight, this was the first time the LM was tested in lunar orbit...
youvebeenthunderstru 1 year ago
Interesting how 10 didn't have the same problem 12 did, going into clouds and producing an electric charge.
youvebeenthunderstru 2 years ago
this is not fake it is real
starbabe58 2 years ago 28
This comment has received too many negative votes show
does anyone have the tape where Walter Cronkite figured that something had caused Apollo 10 to fail? there was a little longer gap of silence coming around the back of the moon.. and Walter stuck his foot in it. no one seems to want to recall when the great walter screwed up.
josephdupont 2 years ago
@josephdupont The resumption of communcations following the ionization blackout of re-entry was delayed on Gemini 6 - that is what you are referring to. Everything in Apollo 10 outside of a misplaced switch setting at LM staging and issues with LM-CSM tunnel pressure was absolutely textbook.
dirac33 9 months ago
As i said on a couple of Moon landing video. The Landing on the moon is like god. I dont beleive in god but i do beleive it do good things to people sometime. Lunar landing i beleive it happen and strongly but i beleive too that it was a good thing for mankind. So indeed of trying to teach people that its a hoax why dont you just enjoy what it did for humanity? Think at that all of you moon hoax beleivers.
psvvac2 2 years ago 3
The problem with your theory is there is no evidence of the existence of God, while there is plenty of evidence for the moon landings.
A little bit of science education will help you with your dilemma.
curea229 2 years ago 2
You obviously didnt get my point, I don't believe in god and there is no evidence of it, but for god, some people help poor people, sick childrens etc so it do good somewhere even if we have no proof it exist? And as the moon landing did, science took giant leap with the moon landing and its only a good thing for humanity!
psvvac2 2 years ago
Maybe I missed the part where you said you do believe we landed on the moon. But it shouldn't be an act of faith, anyone with a background in science realized we went. I think I'm with you now.
curea229 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Everybody is finally seeing the evidence that the moon missions were faked thanks to the internet. There's a partial summary of the hoax evidence in post #1 of this thread below.
3W's (dot) rushlimbaughforum (dot) com/never-went-the-moon-t2782 (dot) html
(check link for gaps)
Cosmored 2 years ago
try telling that to tom stafford.He may be an old man but he can still kick your but.I have talked to him about the hoax fools.He just laghes and says not to worry when someone does go back to the moon,they will find our old spacecraft sitting there.have a wonderfull but dull life.
OKIEMARK 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Instead of talking in generalities, why don't you address the evidence? Tell us why the corner of Collins' jacket behaves the way it does in the clip below.
/watch?v=I_CMgqitv98
(50 second mark)
Here's real zero-G.
/watch?v=TejsnPThmd4
That Apollo footage was taken in gravity. The pro-Apollo person who made the video refuses to comment on this in the comment section of the video.
Cosmored 2 years ago
And maybe the guy who refuses to comment does so because he doesn't like talking to assholes.
Sam13lfc 2 years ago
Everybody is finally seeing evidence of morons on youtube thanks to the Internet. This hoax variant that runs throughout Youtube regarding NASA moon landings is hilarious beyond description. The fact that you can get people to believe anything is proven on a daily basis here. Without photoshop and advances in film editing these people would be in a basement somewhere wearing out tapes of Beatles and Led Zeppelin cuts being played backwards for secret and hidden messages. What a world....
DuvalDem 2 years ago 4
so true man so true
Australian123Gamer 2 years ago
All the "evidence" for the hoax theory has been proved incorrect.
Sam13lfc 2 years ago 33
@Sam13lfc yea dude those guys from mythbusters proved you couldn't fake going to the moon. they tried to fake going to the moon. they just didn't succeed so that prove we went to the moon. right. well i think they proved they could go to the moon wait a minuet they didn't go to the moon, so they faked not going was real and that you could not fake it. wait . im not sure they proved it was real by proving they could not fake it. why were they doing a show about the moon anyway. mythbusters suck
datzfast 1 year ago
@Sam13lfc why would they bother then? why not just go to 1 and be done with it?
they never went to the moon!!!! bbc 4 provedit!!!!!
bullshitdetective1 1 year ago
@bullshitdetective1 So those giant rockets taking off, which people saw in person, and those men falling from the sky 17 times, which people saw in person, are fake? What were they greenscreening the entire fucking sky infront of the live audience? No one ever proved it was fake, because it was real. As I said, all the ''evidence'' for the hoax theory has been proved to be bullshit.
Man, I'm better at your job than you Mr Bullshit Detective.
Sam13lfc 1 year ago 3
@Sam13lfc not to be mean but look at apollo 1 tape NASA said their suites were able to withstand heat over 125 degrees then why did they die from earth fire?
MrTestrak 2 months ago
@MrTestrak Fire burns a LOT hotter than 125 degrees.
Sam13lfc 2 months ago
I loooooove the launch! Did you know that the launch is from live tv!?!
moviedudeinc 3 years ago