Nice plane but is really a step backward from Concorde as it flies at conventional speeds. Its size is amazing but its not beautiful and sleek as Concorde. I prefer the B747.
some serious crosswinds blowing that big motha all over the sky, it will take me a while to warm to the A380, I find it a bit of an ugly duck, functional to its task and nothing more, even decades later I still love the look of the 747 and to an extent, I think its the fact the front of the 747 looks so neet and streamlined and A380 looks so..deformed and irregular, the upper deck swells out wider than the lower deck and cockpit or something odd like that
@PangeaSpreads I have a good reason to don't like it. They are full of problems, first engine explode, now their WING is cracking because the airplane is to heavy. Best part is AIRBUS NEW and did not tell anyone!
@AndrewSephiroth you know what I'm not a dramatist but the 747 is as expected after a life span stemming from 1969, a proven big commercial aircraft so after some 42 or so years later, and after moon landings and Concorde, I can't help but feel disappointed that all the top brains and engineers involved in creating an airline to take us into the next century, came up with a conventional looking jet offering little more than the 1969 747 idea, yawn!! Sardine can with wings
@PangeaSpreads You are wrong my friend, look the 787 its a new airplane, and will change all the aviation from now and on. Makeing it cheaper and also I expect, more confortable. The A380 no big deal, but the 787 thats the NEW CENTURY!
@MrMrToastbrot The main reason is that the two outboard engines are so far out from the wings that the thrust reversers on those engines could rip up the terrain on the outside of the runway. Two thrust reversers is more than enough to help slow down the A380.
@aerialpic It's was not possible to use a tri-pod on this day. There was a pretty strong crosswind and the wind was causing the tri-pod to wobble. The tripod was just too unstable to use it.
@vfr802 With only 2 engines with reverse thrusters, that goes to show how powerful they are with that amount of spray being blown outward. Thanks for the video :)
@factoredin from what I've heard they did it so they don't rip up all the grass on either sides of the runway because they are so far out they hang over the grass
@YULspotter Haha, ok. At the beginning I thought they were the strobe lights of another jet taking off. (I don't know how the runways are at YUL, plz don't criticise me for my ignorance)
Facinante, Genial, Fashion Video!! que encantador Video..! Que elegante se ve el Airbus con el logo de Air France.! De las Mejores Aerolineas del mundo! Aterrizaje Ecepcional! =)
well, the a380 what an ugly plane take the boeing 747 he has a nice form. or the mcdonnel douglas md-11 also nice form. a380 is just made as a big plane no form all as long as he's bigger then the 747. airbus fucks boeing rocks!!
@sonnylatchstring im doing an education called aviation operations or flight planner. all the kids inmy class hates the A380 i do too. look at the a380 with that came thingy in the roof :S there u can see its just made so its the biggest (but ugliest) plane in the world. and don't forget guys: airbus sucks boeing rocks
Sorry, I would recommend to ALL here! DO NOT FLY AIR FRANCE! These guys are dangerous...and they have a very strange approach to flying...! The safety record is clear about it! AIR FRANCE HAS WAY TOO MANY ACCIDENTS! It seems, that they have a real CRM problem...(crew ressource management) and they are really unprofessional regarding voice! Most of them can not speak English as good as they should! I am talking about the pilots here....AVOID AIR FRANCE....too bad, I know, I am an Airline-Pilot!
DreamLiner 787 - Most fuel-efficient, most environmentally-friendly [least CO2 emission], most passenger-friendly [best cabin air O2 purification] airliner ever made. Looking forwards to fly on both!'']
I wonder why such a new and massive plane hasn't got winglets on it. Aren't they supposed to enhance fuel efficiency and overall cruising range by reducing induced drag?
@uchilledfrance Actually, the A380 has a type of winglet called a wing fence. It's the small triangle shapped part facing both up and down at the wingtip. Besides the A380, Airbus has uses them on the A310, A318, A319, A320 and A321 models.
@YULspotter A380 cannot have winglet. Reason why is that the wing of A380 is already too long (79.75 meters) and FAA allowed up to 80 meters for gate access. Unlike Wingfence, winglet(blended wing) is installed at an angle which will exceed the limitation set by FAA. Hope this makes sense~! ^^
@uchilledfrance also putting winglets on the a380 would make it a tight squeeze for the 80 x 80 box a selling point airbus use to make it compatible with existing airports that use 747s.the current wing tip fence works fine as the wing itself is already optimize to be efficient .adding winglets would increase weight too which might not yield that much anyway to justify.a smaller wing would yield more but this was done deliberately to accommodate future models such as the talked about a380-900
@uchilledfrance winglets are really for older frames with less optimize wing, newer aircraft have better wing design due to updated understanding of wake and improved testing. you will notice that flexed raked wing tips are now coming the norm on newer design
@SAACAAS Who cares, the comment was said in a joking matter because of how extravagant the 380 is. I mean literal definitions come on, its a youtube comment not an exam. Are u serious?
Basically winglets help to reduce induced drag and improve performance (also increases aspect ratio slightly). However, the Airbus A380 has very large wing area due to the large wingspan that gives it a high aspect ratio. So, it need not have to worry about aspect ratio but needs only to tackle the induced drag problem. Therefore, it does not require the winglets, but merely ?wingtip fences? similar to those of the Airbus A320.
ALSO THESE AIRCRAFTS FLY BETWEEN MODERN AND EXPANDED AIRPORTS ONLY SO I THINK THEY ARE SAFE ALTHOUGH ITS OPERATIONAL MARGIN OF ERROR IS SIGNIFICANTLY SQUEEZED TO THE MINIMUM.
FOUR ENGINE WILL CLEARLY MAKE IT MORE STABLE AND SAFER THAN SMALLER TWO ENGINE ONES.
I AM AMAZED BY THE LAST TWO SECONDS BEFORE THE TOUCH DOWN.
IT IS SO SMOOTH.
IT ALSO USES ONLY INNER TWO ENGINES FOR BACK THRUST EFFECTIVELY.
I DON'T KNOW HOW LOADED THIS ONE IS BUT ONLY THING I CONCERN ABOUT THIS ONE IS
YOU KNOW I THINK THE PILOTS STILL DID NOT GET THE HANG OF THIS TYPE OF AIRCRAFT YET.
THIS IS SO FAR CLOSER TO THE LIMIT FOR MASS AIR TRANSIT.
I AM SURE THAT THIS WILL BECOME ONE OF MOST POPULAR AIRCRAFT FOR MAJOR INTERCONTINENTAL ROUTES ALTHOUGH I KNOW THAT AIRLINES ARE HESITANT TO PUSH TO ITS DISTANCE LIMIT YET.
THE OPERATORS ARE NOT PILOTS BUT AIRCRAFT HANDLERS.
ECONOMICALLY NONE CAN BEAT THIS AIRCRAFT BECAUSE FUEL COST PER PASSANGER IS ONLY ONE FACTOR.
I'm sure it's just me, but ... does anyone else feel a little leery about this plane...?
I mean, sure, it's probably nothing. I'm positive it's absolutely safe and well-built ... but all the wing-flex and its clumsiness on landing makes me wonder. Most videos I see, the A380 *drops* those last few feet and wobbles around before stabilizing, whereas other aircraft seem to glide down gracefully.
Again, probably just me, but ... I wonder sometimes if Airbus made TOO big a plane...?
@elyasf Wake turbulence is roughly the same as with 747. Boeing fans tried to impose much more space after A380 landings and take-offs, but Airbus demonstrated clearly it wasn't necessary.
Haha, I tried to zoom in with the mouse wheel. :p
swoodard4 17 hours ago
Beautiful landing
Rob2gs 1 day ago
Smoothie landig!!
BOXAXIU 6 days ago
wow
Aviation1275 1 week ago
nadherna masinka :)
miro0782 1 week ago
tropo bello
adryanceban 1 week ago
bom pouso!!!
theschmidtanderson 1 week ago
i like how the A380 looks like it just sits there in the sky.Keep the BIG airplanes flying!!!
trucker6749 2 weeks ago
Wonderful video
irelandbloke 2 weeks ago
SMOOTH!
AqwWarf 2 weeks ago
did you ever wonder at 0:57 how the hell did humans get this beast to fly?
thesuperkain2 2 weeks ago 3
Nice plane but is really a step backward from Concorde as it flies at conventional speeds. Its size is amazing but its not beautiful and sleek as Concorde. I prefer the B747.
shulman2 2 weeks ago
@shulman2
And i do prefer 787.
sdhfyu 2 weeks ago
Great video's man ! Can you subscribe to me . i subscribed to you !
crstian2009 3 weeks ago
show!
caralhoporra36 3 weeks ago
What a crosswind!
Cabincrewifly 4 weeks ago
Boom, runway instantly dry!
Bergstaller01 1 month ago
fantastic ;)
RealFighter12 1 month ago
can it be YUL allways offers pretty good crosswinds ?
sjmunoz 1 month ago
some serious crosswinds blowing that big motha all over the sky, it will take me a while to warm to the A380, I find it a bit of an ugly duck, functional to its task and nothing more, even decades later I still love the look of the 747 and to an extent, I think its the fact the front of the 747 looks so neet and streamlined and A380 looks so..deformed and irregular, the upper deck swells out wider than the lower deck and cockpit or something odd like that
PangeaSpreads 1 month ago
@PangeaSpreads I have a good reason to don't like it. They are full of problems, first engine explode, now their WING is cracking because the airplane is to heavy. Best part is AIRBUS NEW and did not tell anyone!
AndrewSephiroth 1 month ago
@AndrewSephiroth you know what I'm not a dramatist but the 747 is as expected after a life span stemming from 1969, a proven big commercial aircraft so after some 42 or so years later, and after moon landings and Concorde, I can't help but feel disappointed that all the top brains and engineers involved in creating an airline to take us into the next century, came up with a conventional looking jet offering little more than the 1969 747 idea, yawn!! Sardine can with wings
PangeaSpreads 1 month ago
@PangeaSpreads You are wrong my friend, look the 787 its a new airplane, and will change all the aviation from now and on. Makeing it cheaper and also I expect, more confortable. The A380 no big deal, but the 787 thats the NEW CENTURY!
AndrewSephiroth 1 month ago
Great job! I don't know if I'd fly on an A380 right now, because I've read about cracks in the wings on some of them.
dave4shmups 1 month ago
@dave4shmups Actually all of them. They want to ground all A380!
AndrewSephiroth 1 month ago
why do only two of the A 380 s engines have got reverse?
MrMrToastbrot 1 month ago
@MrMrToastbrot The main reason is that the two outboard engines are so far out from the wings that the thrust reversers on those engines could rip up the terrain on the outside of the runway. Two thrust reversers is more than enough to help slow down the A380.
YULspotter 1 month ago 22
@YULspotter why the fuck? xD is it even possible to land safe with such a big plane without reverse ? i mean .... it would be dangerous or not? ...
MrMrToastbrot 1 month ago
Comment removed
lil69crippy 1 month ago
@MrMrToastbrot The original design also had NO reversers, something the certification authorities forced them to change.
mikel1982 1 month ago
An inexpensive tripod would bring out the potential of your videography. Not being critical. I'm just trying to help.
aerialpic 1 month ago
@aerialpic It's was not possible to use a tri-pod on this day. There was a pretty strong crosswind and the wind was causing the tri-pod to wobble. The tripod was just too unstable to use it.
YULspotter 1 month ago
@YULspotter ever considered this? /watch?v=LLlJl7TbXTA Home-made picture stabilizer for about 1$
MrErmenegilde 1 week ago
@YULspotter I can see the effect of crosswind, the A380 was crabbing during its final. Awesome video by the way! :)
ltcolblackcat 2 days ago
Powerful reverse thrust spraying up water off the wet runway. Cool video.
vfr802 1 month ago
@vfr802 With only 2 engines with reverse thrusters, that goes to show how powerful they are with that amount of spray being blown outward. Thanks for the video :)
vfr802 1 month ago
like it but u have to learn how to hold a
camera
king09p1 1 month ago
Very smooth landing!
MrSerdar30 1 month ago
Good thing he avoided that earthquake before landing
WetpantsMcGee 1 month ago
nice vid yul.
blot23 1 month ago
Bravo! muito lindo vídeo.abraços
israel33b 1 month ago
so thts how they dry the runway
blackop83 1 month ago
How about that for French elegance
lanucia69 1 month ago
great landing
shameho 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This video is a favorite on Sierra Leone
elijahunderw25 1 month ago
very nice
colunga78299 1 month ago
Did the guy next to you get enough photos?
nightchad 1 month ago
the day 1 of these things goes down will be a bad day. touch wood
IrishDub18 1 month ago
16+ people are boeing engineers
SALAJAN24 1 month ago
Crab-tastic landing!
NewYorkz 1 month ago
such a great capture, one of YouTube's best captures of an A380 landing
Mainland444 2 months ago 8
Hey:
All the smoke that comes out from the wheels seems to me like a fire
is that normal?.,.
0013rafael 2 months ago
@0013rafael that's not fire, but water ! see other comments
IRACEMABABU 3 weeks ago
What a magnificent bird !
BINKIE2000 2 months ago
freakin awesome landing from the pilots there! amazing! good capture!
planes1997 2 months ago
Holy crap man that's a Hell of a nice airplane I love the A380 it's one of my favorite airplanes in the world. It reaches the top list.
MrAirplanefreak777 2 months ago 2
Wow...perfect landing
WawsestilL 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Very nice video! /watch?v=7_q_lyUddis a nice video from the german miniature wonderland airport..
blind4ever1 2 months ago
Comment removed
blind4ever1 2 months ago
Smooth landing. Smooth video.
fishmanMarch61 2 months ago
awesome video man... never knew u could get THIS close to a landing
shirazrazi97 2 months ago
that landing was a greaser......
somethinextra 2 months ago
@somethinextra what does the term greaser mean?
skbenergy 1 month ago
@skbenergy A Greaser,Slang for a perfect landing in an aircraft,Most of the Space Shuttles touch-downs were Greasers.....
somethinextra 1 month ago
@somethinextra oh thanks man :) i have seen those comments on my videos but i had no clue lol
skbenergy 1 month ago
This video went viral on Botswana
octaviocurti922 2 months ago
I think the camera moved more than the plane. Hope your not a surgeon! dam!
delacerdaa 2 months ago
they wernet birs they appeared then went
FaNaTiiKz100 2 months ago
that was badass in 1080p!
necessaryevil101 2 months ago
@factoredin from what I've heard they did it so they don't rip up all the grass on either sides of the runway because they are so far out they hang over the grass
KevinDR1987 2 months ago
747 r more good in looks n shape..
melbournepure 2 months ago
Very familiar shutter sound in the background there! 40D? 50D?
janernn 2 months ago
@janernn Good observation....
shaantheone 2 months ago
Is it only me? Did anyone else see the lights past the bottom left side of the screen at 0:39?
winsun96 2 months ago 19
@winsun96 Those are some birds actually. But they do look a bit like lights.
YULspotter 2 months ago 18
@YULspotter Haha, ok. At the beginning I thought they were the strobe lights of another jet taking off. (I don't know how the runways are at YUL, plz don't criticise me for my ignorance)
winsun96 2 months ago
@winsun96 probably birds geese is my best guess
MacHynne148 1 month ago
@winsun96 those were birds
ShelbyGT500TT 1 month ago
smooth as silk
tonypham2312 3 months ago
this is the only a380 ive seen land smoothly
tigersfanatic98 3 months ago
Great, like it...
mpzflightvideo 3 months ago
looks like the thrust reverser on engine 4 isnt working
leo3214226 3 months ago
@leo3214226 The A380 doesn't have have thrust reversers on it's outboard engines.
YULspotter 3 months ago 39
@leo3214226 the a380 just have the reverse in the engine 2 and in the engine 3 ok?
limagabriel68 1 month ago
Wow how long is this runway?
joshuapal123 3 months ago
@joshuapal123 About 11,000 feet
YULspotter 3 months ago
@YULspotter Wow in my place it's only about 8,530 ft. long
joshuapal123 3 months ago
@YULspotter Hi dleeho fellow Montrealeeno.
MrAssbaron 3 months ago
GOURGIOUS
theAirlinerTV 3 months ago
Now that's a landing. Doesn't get better than that.
TransynthMan 3 months ago
MY GOD look at that amazing landing and reverse thrust, UNBELIEVABLE !!
Salmeenonme 3 months ago
Amazing landing !!
Darklife66 3 months ago 3
Reverse Thrust only on 2 engines ?
markyk1970 3 months ago
Facinante, Genial, Fashion Video!! que encantador Video..! Que elegante se ve el Airbus con el logo de Air France.! De las Mejores Aerolineas del mundo! Aterrizaje Ecepcional! =)
hauirobert 3 months ago
The largest flying coffin
orientgate 3 months ago
@orientgate ha!ha!ha!...poor ignorant twat. Sad thing is you don't even seem to know that statistically more people die from road accidents yearly.
hommedterre 3 months ago
this fat ass plane looks hard to control
ffuuuucccckk 3 months ago
747-8 to the trash
wwwCRISHKcom 3 months ago
What's the deal with these unstable cameramen ???
lavigneeric 3 months ago
Also 0:40 under the plane. What are these lights?
leikep85 3 months ago
@leikep85 landing lights
lolomgipwnyou 3 months ago
0:08 - 0:11 weird object above the plane.
leikep85 3 months ago
@leikep85 That's a bird dude....don't tell me you are thinking its a UFO, continue the video and you can clearly see it flapping its wings.
CALanceGokongwei 3 months ago
@leikep85 Thats called a bird.
TheTGGuy13 3 months ago
the place where this video was shot from is it public?
reza1217 3 months ago
Smooth landing!
sloppiexx 3 months ago
An emirates A380 just flew over while I was watching this.
LachlanDM 3 months ago
Beautiful machine. Great video!
thiggins621 3 months ago
@thiggins621 its uggly as hell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lordwalkhere 3 months ago
@lordwalkhere Settle down, spaz.
thiggins621 3 months ago
Show de bola
TheDenilson1980 3 months ago
Perfect landing!
Muracosa 3 months ago
Whaa! great...
skshowcase 3 months ago
why he reverce thrust on 2 engien only ??
carpfisherman25 3 months ago
@carpfisherman25
the wings are so big, it goes past the runway's width; the outer two would injest and/or tear up the things around the runway.
CaptainAndreas45 3 months ago
@carpfisherman25 u have far too much power if u land with 4 motors reverse thrusted....
lordwalkhere 3 months ago
@carpfisherman25 thats how the plane was bulilt only reversers on the iner engines
skbenergy 2 months ago
Id say a really nice and smooth landing !
Angel77300 3 months ago
well, the a380 what an ugly plane take the boeing 747 he has a nice form. or the mcdonnel douglas md-11 also nice form. a380 is just made as a big plane no form all as long as he's bigger then the 747. airbus fucks boeing rocks!!
lordwalkhere 4 months ago
@lordwalkhere I can see you know your stuff. You're an expert with solid arguments
sonnylatchstring 3 months ago
@sonnylatchstring im doing an education called aviation operations or flight planner. all the kids inmy class hates the A380 i do too. look at the a380 with that came thingy in the roof :S there u can see its just made so its the biggest (but ugliest) plane in the world. and don't forget guys: airbus sucks boeing rocks
lordwalkhere 3 months ago
@lordwalkhere Du wiederholst Deine haltlosen Argumenten
sonnylatchstring 3 months ago
@sonnylatchstring DU BIST EIN SCHWEINHUND !! MOF!!!
lordwalkhere 3 months ago
@lordwalkhere You're just an infant with a loud mouth, stuff it.
sonnylatchstring 3 months ago
how did you get in that runway?
iryan74656 4 months ago
It looks sad, but physics are relentless. Transaero of Russia is the newest A380 subscriber.
Jyrki1964 4 months ago
A real Jumbojet
Jyrki1964 4 months ago
surperb!
BristolSpotterHD 4 months ago
I wish so much i was there, amazing landing with nice sun!
alessandromarcioig 4 months ago
hahahaha.. it looks like its just floating 0:17 - 0:30
elroriveraify 4 months ago 26
@elroriveraify Trust me this beast of a bird is not floating lol
FlightSimXGamer365 2 months ago
@FlightSimXGamer365 haha its funny thats all.. (=
elroriveraify 2 months ago
that was the smoothest landing i've ever seen!
razgriz786 4 months ago
i heard thai and swiss are on order for a380
Ilovegogosable 4 months ago
I've seen that thing land at IAD. It looks like it just floats to the ground
abchasi27 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry, I would recommend to ALL here! DO NOT FLY AIR FRANCE! These guys are dangerous...and they have a very strange approach to flying...! The safety record is clear about it! AIR FRANCE HAS WAY TOO MANY ACCIDENTS! It seems, that they have a real CRM problem...(crew ressource management) and they are really unprofessional regarding voice! Most of them can not speak English as good as they should! I am talking about the pilots here....AVOID AIR FRANCE....too bad, I know, I am an Airline-Pilot!
tmxcore 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A380 - Biggest passenger airliner ever made.
DreamLiner 787 - Most fuel-efficient, most environmentally-friendly [least CO2 emission], most passenger-friendly [best cabin air O2 purification] airliner ever made. Looking forwards to fly on both!'']
MisterSunson 4 months ago
I wonder why such a new and massive plane hasn't got winglets on it. Aren't they supposed to enhance fuel efficiency and overall cruising range by reducing induced drag?
uchilledfrance 4 months ago
@uchilledfrance they have wingtip fences.
zhuodd 4 months ago
@zhuodd Yes indeed...not sure how I missed them. Thanks mate. Cheers. :-)
uchilledfrance 4 months ago
@uchilledfrance Actually, the A380 has a type of winglet called a wing fence. It's the small triangle shapped part facing both up and down at the wingtip. Besides the A380, Airbus has uses them on the A310, A318, A319, A320 and A321 models.
YULspotter 4 months ago 21
@YULspotter Thanks mate. I just noticed the winglet fences on the plane. I'd somehow missed them the first time around. Cheers :-)
uchilledfrance 4 months ago
@YULspotter A380 cannot have winglet. Reason why is that the wing of A380 is already too long (79.75 meters) and FAA allowed up to 80 meters for gate access. Unlike Wingfence, winglet(blended wing) is installed at an angle which will exceed the limitation set by FAA. Hope this makes sense~! ^^
lsh2429516 3 months ago
@uchilledfrance also putting winglets on the a380 would make it a tight squeeze for the 80 x 80 box a selling point airbus use to make it compatible with existing airports that use 747s.the current wing tip fence works fine as the wing itself is already optimize to be efficient .adding winglets would increase weight too which might not yield that much anyway to justify.a smaller wing would yield more but this was done deliberately to accommodate future models such as the talked about a380-900
JQX1 4 months ago
@uchilledfrance winglets are really for older frames with less optimize wing, newer aircraft have better wing design due to updated understanding of wake and improved testing. you will notice that flexed raked wing tips are now coming the norm on newer design
JQX1 4 months ago
@uchilledfrance A380 and fuel efficiency dont belong in the same sentence
trabang 4 months ago
@trabang Efficiency and low consumption are not the same. Search: Efficiency in Wikipedia and learn it (See you the article "in physics" too).
SAACAAS 4 months ago
@SAACAAS Who cares, the comment was said in a joking matter because of how extravagant the 380 is. I mean literal definitions come on, its a youtube comment not an exam. Are u serious?
trabang 4 months ago
@trabang That's exactly why major companies over the world are buying A380, they are totally crazy about burning oil for no reason...
IRACEMABABU 3 weeks ago
@uchilledfrance
It does have winglets
scorpyonn 3 months ago
Basically winglets help to reduce induced drag and improve performance (also increases aspect ratio slightly). However, the Airbus A380 has very large wing area due to the large wingspan that gives it a high aspect ratio. So, it need not have to worry about aspect ratio but needs only to tackle the induced drag problem. Therefore, it does not require the winglets, but merely ?wingtip fences? similar to those of the Airbus A320.
dudler 3 months ago
perfeito pouso!!
caralhoporra36 5 months ago
Download Full pilotseye 30 HD, blue-ray video torrents files:
hxxp://sendspace. com/file/qvn3su
hxxp://megaupload. com/?d=YIGDJZ2Q
hxxs://rapidshare. com/files/1271004941/PilotsEYE_FULL_HD__video_torrents_files.rar
ZZZFROMHELLZZZ 5 months ago
Vive AIRBUS!!
s3fredo 5 months ago
A little crosswind there!
323tiim 5 months ago
nice fucking landing!!!!!!
zohar3998 5 months ago
BUT IT IS A SOLID WELL BUILT AIRCRAFT AND SAFE.
WE CANNOT AFFORD ANY MISHAPS OF THIS ONE BECAUSE FINANCIAL VIABILITY OF MANY AIRLINES ARE RIDING ON.
IT DOES NOT LOOK PARTICULARLY UGLY EITHER.
IT REMINDS ME OF CANADIAN GEESE WHICH MIGRATES BETWEEN ARTICS AND USA ON LAWN POWER.
SusanPrescott 5 months ago
A LOT TO SLOW DOWN THIS THING.
IT SEEMS IT TAKES ABOUT FOUR TIMES TO TAKE COMPARED WITH A330 SEIRES.
IT WILL BE LESS SUSCEPTIBLE TO CROSS WINDS SO THAT CAN BE A TRADE OFF.
I DON'T THINK THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WILL GENERATE MUCH FASCINATIONS.
ALSO ITS DECENT LOOKS STIFFER THAN OTHER AIRCRAFT BECAUSE IT RELIES ON ENGINES THAN THE WING TO GET THE LIFTS.
AS SOON AS THE PUSHES ARE DOWN THE AIRCRART DECENDS RAPIDLY BECAUSE ITS WING IS GENERATING PROPOTIONALLY LESS LIFT PER ITS WEIGHT.
SusanPrescott 5 months ago
ALSO THESE AIRCRAFTS FLY BETWEEN MODERN AND EXPANDED AIRPORTS ONLY SO I THINK THEY ARE SAFE ALTHOUGH ITS OPERATIONAL MARGIN OF ERROR IS SIGNIFICANTLY SQUEEZED TO THE MINIMUM.
FOUR ENGINE WILL CLEARLY MAKE IT MORE STABLE AND SAFER THAN SMALLER TWO ENGINE ONES.
I AM AMAZED BY THE LAST TWO SECONDS BEFORE THE TOUCH DOWN.
IT IS SO SMOOTH.
IT ALSO USES ONLY INNER TWO ENGINES FOR BACK THRUST EFFECTIVELY.
I DON'T KNOW HOW LOADED THIS ONE IS BUT ONLY THING I CONCERN ABOUT THIS ONE IS
SusanPrescott 5 months ago
YOU KNOW I THINK THE PILOTS STILL DID NOT GET THE HANG OF THIS TYPE OF AIRCRAFT YET.
THIS IS SO FAR CLOSER TO THE LIMIT FOR MASS AIR TRANSIT.
I AM SURE THAT THIS WILL BECOME ONE OF MOST POPULAR AIRCRAFT FOR MAJOR INTERCONTINENTAL ROUTES ALTHOUGH I KNOW THAT AIRLINES ARE HESITANT TO PUSH TO ITS DISTANCE LIMIT YET.
THE OPERATORS ARE NOT PILOTS BUT AIRCRAFT HANDLERS.
ECONOMICALLY NONE CAN BEAT THIS AIRCRAFT BECAUSE FUEL COST PER PASSANGER IS ONLY ONE FACTOR.
SusanPrescott 5 months ago
I'm sure it's just me, but ... does anyone else feel a little leery about this plane...?
I mean, sure, it's probably nothing. I'm positive it's absolutely safe and well-built ... but all the wing-flex and its clumsiness on landing makes me wonder. Most videos I see, the A380 *drops* those last few feet and wobbles around before stabilizing, whereas other aircraft seem to glide down gracefully.
Again, probably just me, but ... I wonder sometimes if Airbus made TOO big a plane...?
Lndmk227 5 months ago
I love the trust reserve! I got over 100 aviation video ;-) When you want visit my channal!
HamburgAirport 5 months ago
0:43 UFO
boteczek1 5 months ago
@bvestationfan the reason why they reverse only in engine 2 and 3 because if they reverse on 4 it will rip off the runway
unixkid52 5 months ago
EXCEPTIONAL !!!
bidutzu 6 months ago
cross wind
medaminbs 6 months ago
FAKE air france plane !!! it didn't crash
PatoWiNNERS 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch my videos
TheYann97300 6 months ago
I was on this fly. Very smooth take off in CDG and landing in YUL. We had a very nice fly. I was on seat 83 , upper deck.
TheYann97300 6 months ago
Ein starkes Video !!! Klasse !!! Gut gemacht !!!
Corviniana 6 months ago
Just imagine the wake turbulence after an A380!!
Not so smart with an Cessna 172 on short final right behind this huge bitch!
elyasf 6 months ago
@elyasf Wake turbulence is roughly the same as with 747. Boeing fans tried to impose much more space after A380 landings and take-offs, but Airbus demonstrated clearly it wasn't necessary.
IRACEMABABU 3 weeks ago
nice video! where are you standing to get this view? ch. Saint-Francois?
guiltc 6 months ago
nice video :)
TheAviationdisasters 6 months ago