Robert Bork - Constitutional Precedent

[writersblock26]

Thank you for posting this, LibertyPen.

[vidhead85]

Funny how someone says a married couple has a right to privacy but no one else does...terrible. Craziness

[AndroidPolitician]

Leave it to Bork to hate any kind of right to privacy. He's probably against Miranda rights too.

[MyRiseToHonor]

AHHHH, Bork! The beginning of the end when it comes to politicians working together! Thanks to the recoil from the Left "Borking" this guy from becoming a member of The Supreme Court back in Reagan's day, which was not a bad thing at all, these jackasses on The Left and The Right will never work together! This country is doomed!

[ffairlane57]

i never slouched toward Gomorrah...I LUNGED AT IT!!

[guyjunk]

A man that should not have been a chief justice but instead a president.Those that comment about freedoms without ever reading or understand intent of the constituion carry with it little weight.

[framptonorchablis]

Bork is a lunatic.

He said about the right to privacy, "a husband and wife no greater right to privacy than a smokestack has the right to pollute the air."

If you believe in "liberty" he's the last person you want on the court.

[fzqlcs]

@framptonorchablis Please provide a reference for that quote. It sounds like something a Bork-hater made up.

[saintdracula]

@framptonorchablis I disagree -

By right he meant Constitutional right.

He's more courageous than anyone in that he doesn't hide.

[Albyiscool]

@framptonorchablis

the problem with right to privacy is that there is no way to define it, and any definition by a court outside actual constitutional text is arbitrary

[3684541]

You have a great channel. I randomly stumble across your vids, regularly, and I've already subscribed to it! Beautiful. Thanks for taking the time these videos.

[3684541]

@3684541 Thanks. I tried to say more but I'm drunk (previously written: "drunks"; just stumbled on "drinks.") Never the less, thank you.

[eugdog106]

hes not a nut but sandra day o'connor is

[Superplatanoman]

Bork is a nut

[thafix82]

bork is a liar, congress can pass an amendment to correct judges mistakes

[BOOLsheet]

that's extremely difficult to do. amendments are rarely passed.

[karlsmith00]

yes you are entitled to your opinions. you can thank the supreme court for upholding the first amendment in that regard.

[karlsmith00]

okay crazy

[karlsmith00]

the ABA only accredits law schools sweetheart, not undergraduate schools which confer bachelor's degrees. please stop lying. it's pretty pathetic. i can tell you have no degree at all.

i say "benefit" as in women's lives (men's too) have improved by controlling the number of kids. white males have plenty of advantages, so stop crying. they're still the majority in congress, supreme court, business. if you're just another white failure looking for excuses for your failures i won't waste my time.

[karlsmith00]

a "BS in paralegal studies." wow! no college offers a bachelor's of science in "paralegal studies." there is "legal studies" but it's a bachelor's of arts. you should get your money back from whatever junior college you went to. and that paralegal "degree" has certainly caused you to be eloquent, i must say.

the supreme court exists to interpret the constitution. the decision stands, no matter how much you whine. and many women have benefitted from it. too bad your mother wasn't on the pill.

[karlsmith00]

nice profile name. anybody with such class and eloquence obviously deserves respect. anybody who would say that has no legal training.

and btw you're probably the best advertisement for birth control, which is included under privacy rights. your mother should have been on the pill. the best arguments against idiots like you are the idiots themselves. so please keep it up, einstein!

[thesprague]

Doesn't he mean that because Congress can change statute and common law and cannot change constitutional rulings that preceden is MORE important in constitutional law than any other?

[karlsmith00]

why do so many old white men sit around obsessing about how and when women should have children? we don't sit around trying to control when they can get viagra. all of these geezers need to mind their own business. this isn't about "life" it's about sex and controlling women. they don't give a crap about the death penalty, guns, war, poverty after birth, which kills plenty.

please mind your own business you old dried up republican pricks

[CoombesKidd]

you'r a dumbass. if women are stupid sluts they should take responsibility, not kill unborn children. guns dont kill people in the hands of law abiding citizens, the death penalty only kills those who kill others, war is against evil people

[karlsmith00]

why yes of course! any woman who gets pregnant is a "stupid slut" who should be forced to give birth to an unwanted child. meanwhile the stupid pig who knocked her up should be able to run off with no responsibility.

and now you're making value judgments on who gets to kill. supposedly you morons are supposed to be about "life." what's the difference between aborting a fetus and killing it later after it commits a crime because it had a terrible life?

[karlsmith00]

this has nothing to do with life. animals like you don't give two shits about life.

this is about controlling sexual behavior and making sure women have no control over their reproductive systems. and you proved the point with your unlettered comment.

and btw, i'm sure jesus would be proud. you strike me as a jesus freak, as most uneducated people in this country are, especially males.

[bubbleblurz]

i dun think stare decisis is good...cz it's impossible for all cases have the SAME facts and SAME condition..

[sdsunandfun]

To bad our constitution is a ink plot

[prrolg]

Roe is the reason that Schumer,Leahy, Biden and other creeps and scum grilled Roberts so hard on starry decisis. Only the court can remove their trojan horse.