Valentina Lisitsa, are you kidding me? Not to take anything away from her artistry, however, Rubinstein can't be touched. Listen to the beauty he acheives in the slow section, perfection of rubato and inevenitability. Also, the way he handles the finale, the dramatic and structural clarity.
Someone posted a movie score on Facebook claiming it was "One of the most brilliant pieces of score ever written" I posted "No." and posted this in response.
ive actually been taking piano lessons on and off for a few years and every time i hear a master piece like this it fuels me to keep up with it. i always skip levels and what not and at the rate im going maybe ill be able to play this in another year.
I began working on this piece on 27 last month, still , like , but I am giving up on it already. Maybe , Chopin got bored with this , too. That is why it is not published in his time. I still like this song, tho.
@30inventionman A tip from me is to play the right hand louder and make the accents more clear. Don't pedal too much, those are the things I've improved at. And don't forget it's P
@Beckmesser2 its not in c sharp minor...its like in the middle between C# and C! the piano is tuned 0.5 halfsteps lower.. but thanks a lot for uploading this! i really thought this was the draft version :) but still thought it was better..since i heard this recording time ago, ive always played F# instead of G# at 1:05. do u have the score?
@Alquatari The original piece is in C sharp minor, and yes, this recording is somehow lower than that, with almost a semitone, you're right about both. I guess maybe the piano's tuning could be different, or (more likely) as this is a nearly 50-years-old copy, the original vinyl could've been somewhat damaged already, when they made the digital version.
@Alquatari You are right it doens't sound tunned in 440 it's a little lower than that. Thumbs up for your ear!!!!! Funny, people kept insisting in saying the tone of this piece written regardless to the tone that it sounds in this recording.
How lucky for you. He produced some of the most exquisite music ever written. I would be blessed to be one of his descendants!! One can only imagine the processes going on inside his brain!!!
@excalibur1812 yeaah i only found out at the start of the year, it was a great start to 2011! and i am "naturally talented," as mum would say. haha she keeps trying to send me to peter voxx to do lessons and stuff
Someone correct me if I am mistaken, but I believe after hearing this over and over again, that Arthur left out a few bars of the second to last page after the crashing cadenza. The few bars should repeat the E E D# D# C#, E E D# D# C#. I'm basing this off of studying the urtext signature edition of this final version.
Someone correct me if I am mistaken, but I believe after hearing this over and over again, that Arthur left out a few bars of the second to last page after the crashing cadenza. The few bars should repeat the E E D# D# C#, E E D# D# C#I'm basing this off of studying the urtext signature edition of this final version.
@marcsfutures nah, final version leaves this bit out, making it a few bars shorter. This doesn't mean its easier, though - the left hand arpeggios in the 1st and last sections are much harder to play than in the draft version.
there are actually quite a few differences - if I were you I'd buy a copy (look for GREAT PERFORMERS EDITION published by Rubinstein :p), i've got one and its awesome
@otternox2 Umm I'm looking at the final edition now Urtext, the bars are left in, Rubinstein shortened it. If you listen to Suguru Ito, a rendition that is quite interesting but nonetheless the final edition, the bars are left in.
@marcsfutures nah, final version leaves this bit out, making it a few bars shorter. This doesn't mean its easier, though - the left hand arpeggios in the 1st and last sections are much harder to play than in the draft version.
there are actually quite a few differences - if I were you I'd buy a copy (look for GREAT PERFORMERS EDITION published by Rubinstein :p), i've got one and its awesome
pogorelich and arrau both play this version (or at least some semblance of it). i for one am not a fan of this version. the elimination of some of the syncopation and rubato as well as some of the small harmonic and rhythmic alterations do not add interest to the piece and at times even mars its forward momentum.
@igorstanivuk I appreciate your arrogant sarcasm, ser. If you mind to know, I am only in high school and have not taken a huge interest within the area of "Musical Repertoire or Musical Theory." I pray you understand, so please stop acting like an arrogant asshole. Thank you much :)
Rubinstein found this so called "autograph" of Chopin Op 66. It is more difficult than the "Fontana" edition. To most people, the two versions sound the same but I dare say that at least 15% of the notes are different, especially in the left hand.
Get the Henle music for Chopin Impromptus and these are 4a (autograph) and 4b (Fontana).
@shadox662 No no! Don't compare it like that. Do you realize that Chopin didn't want this piece published because he felt the same way? It was only after his death, a friend he had bestowed it to and specifically told not to publish, ended up for the greater good, doing just the opposite. This piece is absolutely beautiful and one of my favorites. As is Chopin my favorite composer.
@shadox66the first and 3rd movement are in C# minor the 2nd movement is actually in Dflat major or C# major. This is the exact same type of modulation as the moonlight sonata.
@ilioo90 Song usually requires words, and I don't believe that u can hear any words in this, as u say "song"!
Therefore, we call this kind of musical pieces a Compositions, or when Arthur plays it, just incredibly beautiful piece of music.. :) Take care, and if u need any other definitions, like maybe what is a piano or violin, just send message, and I will find some time to clarify these terms for you!!
@ilioo90 Song usually requires words, and I don't believe that u can hear any words in this, as u say "song"!
Therefore, we call this kind of musical pieces a Compositions, or when Arthur plays it, just incredibly beautiful piece of music.. :) Take care, and if u need any other definitions, like maybe what is a piano or violin, just send message, and I will find some time to clarify these terms for you!!
Chopin was an utter genius for his time. I have never heard anything as beautiful as a Chopin masterpiece. There is a difference C minor and C# Minor (which this song is in.) Just letting everyone know.
What are the chords he plays at :58 with the left hand at the bottom of the chromatic scale? Do you have the sheet music? Can you tell me what they are?
@kimkwatson - I believe that's measure 35. The LH starts that measure with a low G#, C#, E, middle G# eighth note chord (2/2 time) which is the ending note of the previous measure's phrase (RH ending on a high G# 16th note). There's a 16th rest in the RH, and a Chromatic scale of 16th notes starting at G# an octave above. Then on count 2 the LH goes to a F double sharp, C#, E, F# quarter note chord. The RH hits a D natural on that chord as it chromatics down to the middle C#.
Ahhh! Yep, that's the one! I used to play it over and over on my father;s 'record player' ! Havent heard it in years! Chills, and goosebumps..I can smell the summer breeze,,,what perfection!. Thank you thankyouthankyou. ! Martha
Know nothing about music; keys, etc, only that I really like this! Could someone point me to something similar by other pianists? Does not have to be Chopin but nothing too slow! lol
Thanks from someone who is appreciating and trying to understand!
Just listening to this version as compared to the earlier draft, I can see why he hated it. The changes he made are so tiny, so meticulous, I get the sense that he had a really tough time getting it to sound the way he wanted. Ironic that his most popular piece was one we were never intended to hear.
ROdblIS: the only reason Chopin didn't want the draft version published is because he sold the final version to the Baroness d'Este. If you buy the final edition from Schirmer, you can read all about it in the prologue Rubinstein wrote.
@BrianDaNoob actually he changes many notes and i really don't like the first and final part, just the middle that i would say it was singing to some extent.
Chopin made a few versions of the Fantaisie-impromptu. This is the Final developed version Chopin produced. Every note played is meant to compliment the first and proceeding note with a balance of grace and agitation. This method produces an atmosphere of a beauteous despair with a longing for freedom. This piece balances chaos and harmony, and for that it is my favorite.
i still like the other version more... the small changes in this one make it sound less powerful in some places although it could have a bit to do with the interpretation as well
Keep in mind, the story behind this song was that Chopin made it up on the fly basically. He was playing a concert and just whipped this thing up, so god only knows what the original sounded like. Plus, after he wrote it, he wished he never had because he hated it to the day he died.
One of if not the best artist to play Chopin. Such grace this man conveys...I still have the Rubinstein Impromptus CD I bought 23 years ago.
Chopinrocks71 1 month ago
432hz
Ponnybit 1 month ago
well too bad no matter what you say... rubinstein is still considered the bestchopin player ever
laongcameaspider 1 month ago
Valentina Lisitsa, are you kidding me? Not to take anything away from her artistry, however, Rubinstein can't be touched. Listen to the beauty he acheives in the slow section, perfection of rubato and inevenitability. Also, the way he handles the finale, the dramatic and structural clarity.
JamesinLA1 1 month ago in playlist Chopin Fantasy Impromptu
Sorry Arthur, but Valentina does it better
Pilpellon 3 months ago
@Pilpellon
No. Rubinstein is Rubinstein. Valentina Lisitsa cant be compared to Rubinstein in any sense.
kzelmer 2 months ago 2
@kzelmer I meant Valentina Igoshina :-)
Pilpellon 2 months ago
0:08 to 0:20 always gives me goosebumps
163388416 4 months ago
Although aesthetic approbation is difficult this is completely magnificent. Merci. Danke. Thanks.
Isospinsymmetries 5 months ago
After playing Clock Tower 3, I had to look this up. This is awesome! :D
Aliciaclaw 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pity for it's not a video, it's only an photo(old photos) collection. :( :P
ManUtdFan0521 6 months ago
Flat.. Rather.. Flat..
haKittehh 6 months ago
@Beckmesser2 I jolly like it.
dbspd4d29 6 months ago
What good playing!
dbspd4d29 7 months ago 2
Comment removed
alexanderpuritano 7 months ago
Thank you Beckmesser2
Natasha77571 7 months ago
I prefer the first version of Fantaisie Impromptu. But, this is still beautiful.
paopaomanalansan 8 months ago
Someone posted a movie score on Facebook claiming it was "One of the most brilliant pieces of score ever written" I posted "No." and posted this in response.
TheShotgunNinja 8 months ago 2
@TheShotgunNinja hahaha awesome my friend xD made me smile there =]
F4TB0Y69 8 months ago
ive actually been taking piano lessons on and off for a few years and every time i hear a master piece like this it fuels me to keep up with it. i always skip levels and what not and at the rate im going maybe ill be able to play this in another year.
pikachu31011 8 months ago
I began working on this piece on 27 last month, still , like , but I am giving up on it already. Maybe , Chopin got bored with this , too. That is why it is not published in his time. I still like this song, tho.
30inventionman 9 months ago
How do you play this? I have to perform this in a week?
30inventionman 9 months ago
@30inventionman A tip from me is to play the right hand louder and make the accents more clear. Don't pedal too much, those are the things I've improved at. And don't forget it's P
ImmortalSpecies 9 months ago
Breathtaking.
MsPepperminta 9 months ago
Hm... I find this more staccato then other versions of this piece.
ILOVECLASSICALify 9 months ago
Already have speed, but the volume is difficult to control=<
iam0iq 9 months ago
well played, sir....but what did I expect??...lol
Alanpini 10 months ago
I thought my piano was out of tune when I heared this 0,0
But great piece, very nicely interpreted ^^
Galoot5 10 months ago
he makes it sound so easy but its not lol
krisevan1 10 months ago
damn Rubinstein, you're good.
maestroadam 11 months ago
It's wonderful but the recording... am I right that this isn't c# minor? My ears suffer.
Alquatari 11 months ago 3
@Alquatari It is in C# minor.
Beckmesser2 11 months ago 5
@Beckmesser2 its not in c sharp minor...its like in the middle between C# and C! the piano is tuned 0.5 halfsteps lower.. but thanks a lot for uploading this! i really thought this was the draft version :) but still thought it was better..since i heard this recording time ago, ive always played F# instead of G# at 1:05. do u have the score?
124235346 4 months ago
@Beckmesser2 I think the piano is slightly flat.
brandonscherrer 3 months ago
@Alquatari The piano used is old so it does not perfectly appear as C#minor
HomsyTeddy 11 months ago
@HomsyTeddy And that's probably what I meant. :-) I wasn't sure so I asked.
Alquatari 11 months ago
@Alquatari
I think the issue you're having is that the recording is somewhat flat. Comparing it with other recordings, it almost sounds like it's in C minor.
BigGermanBassoonist 7 months ago
@Alquatari The original piece is in C sharp minor, and yes, this recording is somehow lower than that, with almost a semitone, you're right about both. I guess maybe the piano's tuning could be different, or (more likely) as this is a nearly 50-years-old copy, the original vinyl could've been somewhat damaged already, when they made the digital version.
gysebok 4 months ago
@Alquatari You are right it doens't sound tunned in 440 it's a little lower than that. Thumbs up for your ear!!!!! Funny, people kept insisting in saying the tone of this piece written regardless to the tone that it sounds in this recording.
DiegoJGorzynski 1 month ago
@Alquatari piano is tuned a few steps lower...
guitarfreak23397 3 weeks ago
@Alquatari The slow section is in D flat.
coffemuse 2 weeks ago
I don't know how many times I have listened to this but let's just say it's never enough.
clare602 11 months ago
chopin is one of my ancestors or what ever like my great great great great great great great uncle or something. pretty awesome.
shonarenee1995 1 year ago
@shonarenee1995
How lucky for you. He produced some of the most exquisite music ever written. I would be blessed to be one of his descendants!! One can only imagine the processes going on inside his brain!!!
excalibur1812 11 months ago
@excalibur1812 yeaah i only found out at the start of the year, it was a great start to 2011! and i am "naturally talented," as mum would say. haha she keeps trying to send me to peter voxx to do lessons and stuff
shonarenee1995 11 months ago
the best interpretation that i ever heard...
DusToken 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch the interpretation from Malle
thx
Rachmaninoffff 1 year ago
this sounds great even on an out of tune piano
jwilliams575 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Someone correct me if I am mistaken, but I believe after hearing this over and over again, that Arthur left out a few bars of the second to last page after the crashing cadenza. The few bars should repeat the E E D# D# C#, E E D# D# C#. I'm basing this off of studying the urtext signature edition of this final version.
marcsfutures 1 year ago
Someone correct me if I am mistaken, but I believe after hearing this over and over again, that Arthur left out a few bars of the second to last page after the crashing cadenza. The few bars should repeat the E E D# D# C#, E E D# D# C#I'm basing this off of studying the urtext signature edition of this final version.
marcsfutures 1 year ago
@marcsfutures nah, final version leaves this bit out, making it a few bars shorter. This doesn't mean its easier, though - the left hand arpeggios in the 1st and last sections are much harder to play than in the draft version.
there are actually quite a few differences - if I were you I'd buy a copy (look for GREAT PERFORMERS EDITION published by Rubinstein :p), i've got one and its awesome
otternox2 1 year ago
@otternox2 Umm I'm looking at the final edition now Urtext, the bars are left in, Rubinstein shortened it. If you listen to Suguru Ito, a rendition that is quite interesting but nonetheless the final edition, the bars are left in.
marcsfutures 1 year ago
@marcsfutures nah, final version leaves this bit out, making it a few bars shorter. This doesn't mean its easier, though - the left hand arpeggios in the 1st and last sections are much harder to play than in the draft version.
there are actually quite a few differences - if I were you I'd buy a copy (look for GREAT PERFORMERS EDITION published by Rubinstein :p), i've got one and its awesome
otternox2 1 year ago
currently practicing this. am gonna post a video of me playing this soon!
out of all the composers i love chopin the most.
mystryaabbie 1 year ago
guys it is c# minor. just look at the key signature
jellytroid 1 year ago
Chopin never really composed for other instruments or for Orchestra. Yet everything he did compose for piano is so brilliant. And so original!
terrybeaton 1 year ago
pogorelich and arrau both play this version (or at least some semblance of it). i for one am not a fan of this version. the elimination of some of the syncopation and rubato as well as some of the small harmonic and rhythmic alterations do not add interest to the piece and at times even mars its forward momentum.
utubuser10 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is Zhanna Arshanskaya's song!
swanniG2 1 year ago
This is Zhanna Arshanskaya's song!
swanniG2 1 year ago
@igorstanivuk I appreciate your arrogant sarcasm, ser. If you mind to know, I am only in high school and have not taken a huge interest within the area of "Musical Repertoire or Musical Theory." I pray you understand, so please stop acting like an arrogant asshole. Thank you much :)
ilioo90 1 year ago
Rubinstein found this so called "autograph" of Chopin Op 66. It is more difficult than the "Fontana" edition. To most people, the two versions sound the same but I dare say that at least 15% of the notes are different, especially in the left hand.
Get the Henle music for Chopin Impromptus and these are 4a (autograph) and 4b (Fontana).
stibgo 1 year ago
my favourite
monicacmt 1 year ago
no... i think its in C# minor... xD
you can hear it out! ;D
'(at the beginning it sounds like the moonlight sonata...^^)
Sorry for bad english. xD
shadox662 1 year ago 7
@shadox662 Es ist in C scharfem moll.
Beckmesser2 1 year ago
@shadox662 No no! Don't compare it like that. Do you realize that Chopin didn't want this piece published because he felt the same way? It was only after his death, a friend he had bestowed it to and specifically told not to publish, ended up for the greater good, doing just the opposite. This piece is absolutely beautiful and one of my favorites. As is Chopin my favorite composer.
RavenLavender 1 year ago
@shadox66the first and 3rd movement are in C# minor the 2nd movement is actually in Dflat major or C# major. This is the exact same type of modulation as the moonlight sonata.
Redrab182 7 months ago
@Redrab182 i suppose you don't know the word "third".
dbspd4d29 6 months ago
@shadox662 Arigatou for you writing sorry for bad english
dbspd4d29 6 months ago
@shadox662 It has many of the same aspects used in moonlight movement 3.
brandonscherrer 3 months ago
@Sword1479 And how is this not a song?
ilioo90 1 year ago
@ilioo90 Song usually requires words, and I don't believe that u can hear any words in this, as u say "song"!
Therefore, we call this kind of musical pieces a Compositions, or when Arthur plays it, just incredibly beautiful piece of music.. :) Take care, and if u need any other definitions, like maybe what is a piano or violin, just send message, and I will find some time to clarify these terms for you!!
igorstanivuk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ilioo90 Song usually requires words, and I don't believe that u can hear any words in this, as u say "song"!
Therefore, we call this kind of musical pieces a Compositions, or when Arthur plays it, just incredibly beautiful piece of music.. :) Take care, and if u need any other definitions, like maybe what is a piano or violin, just send message, and I will find some time to clarify these terms for you!!
igorstanivuk 1 year ago
To me the Fantasie Impromptu is always been two pieces..
A mad graveyard at midnight..romp of a scherzo..
and a profoundly beautiful nocturne..lover's moon rise.
I enjoyed the way Rubenstien plays the first theme almost like
a mazurka rhythm..and the way he really brings in that harp sound..
on the second theme is something to behold.
johnnynoirman 1 year ago
Nice job but did u use the pedal?:l
bloorstreetwest 1 year ago
@bloorstreetwest Thank you for your complement, but this is the legendary Arthur Rubinstein playing.
Beckmesser2 1 year ago 13
Chopin was an utter genius for his time. I have never heard anything as beautiful as a Chopin masterpiece. There is a difference C minor and C# Minor (which this song is in.) Just letting everyone know.
ilioo90 1 year ago
@ilioo90 And this isn't a song, just letting you know.
Sword1479 1 year ago
Wow. I'm 13 and I find this to be simply wonderful. <3
Alsgirlfriend 1 year ago
soo beautiful (:
threelttlpigs 1 year ago
What are the chords he plays at :58 with the left hand at the bottom of the chromatic scale? Do you have the sheet music? Can you tell me what they are?
kimkwatson 1 year ago
@kimkwatson - I believe that's measure 35. The LH starts that measure with a low G#, C#, E, middle G# eighth note chord (2/2 time) which is the ending note of the previous measure's phrase (RH ending on a high G# 16th note). There's a 16th rest in the RH, and a Chromatic scale of 16th notes starting at G# an octave above. Then on count 2 the LH goes to a F double sharp, C#, E, F# quarter note chord. The RH hits a D natural on that chord as it chromatics down to the middle C#.
thrashercharged 1 year ago
IT'S NOT IN C MINOR PEOPLE.
dudedudedude94 1 year ago
Aww god, it's gorgeous in C minor.
riptonks 1 year ago
What a lovley touch (:
doc105 1 year ago
Ahhh! Yep, that's the one! I used to play it over and over on my father;s 'record player' ! Havent heard it in years! Chills, and goosebumps..I can smell the summer breeze,,,what perfection!. Thank you thankyouthankyou. ! Martha
fischerpilne 1 year ago 2
Just lovely.
Jesavee 1 year ago
I think the manunscript is a falsification. It is not Chopin hand writting.! It is my oppinion.
henrique1944 1 year ago
Know nothing about music; keys, etc, only that I really like this! Could someone point me to something similar by other pianists? Does not have to be Chopin but nothing too slow! lol
Thanks from someone who is appreciating and trying to understand!
oldman1966 1 year ago
@oldman1966 - lookup "chopin Valentina Igoshina"
pianorags 1 year ago
@oldman1966 you might like some of the Beethoven sonatas and Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsody.
uptonman666 1 year ago
Oh yes I have. Not only that, heard Leslie Crowther play, and sing to it live. He, who was Phil Lynotts Father-in-law.
dcarroll74 1 year ago
Beautiful!!! omgsh <3 im in love with this
CheesecakePower 1 year ago
*Shiver*
Clock Tower
o.o
Nicoleisous 1 year ago
What a talented man.
MegaManoman 1 year ago
I adore this piece... One of my favorites from Chopin.
LittleJade07 1 year ago
where can i get a sheet music for this????????
MoondawgJM 1 year ago
@MoondawgJM Look in your inbox.
ThePVGS1 1 year ago
why is rubinstein so freak'n amazing??!!!
i love him
rose7art 1 year ago
wow really is a jewel
theodorehui 1 year ago
oooh ive never heard it in c minor!
KevinBeethoven 1 year ago 2
@KevinBeethoven
Nor have I.
Beckmesser2 1 year ago 5
@Beckmesser2 yeah but the intonation's a bit flat on the old recording
bomberchicken 1 year ago
@Beckmesser2 that's because it's not in C Minor but in C# Minor, isn't it? ;)
Sanitoeter666 1 year ago
@Sanitoeter666
Of course!
Beckmesser2 1 year ago
@KevinBeethoven A at his time was a semitone lower
lugia888 1 year ago
@KevinBeethoven And yhou're not hearing it in c minor now. If you think you have absolute pitch, perhaps you should invest in tighter underwear.
MrRicksStudio 1 year ago
@MrRicksStudio wtf???
KevinBeethoven 1 year ago
@KevinBeethoven If you're hearing it in C minor, your pitch memory is screwed. Too much crack?
MrRicksStudio 1 year ago
@MrRicksStudio no, the piano is not tuned very well, dipshit. it was very very common
KevinBeethoven 1 year ago
@KevinBeethoven I don't understood! It is in C# minor, and not c minor.
henrique1944 1 year ago
@henrique1944 the piano is not tuned very well so it SOUNDS like its in c minor
KevinBeethoven 1 year ago
amazing! :)
pmglp 1 year ago
Ua i che mostr
19checco80 1 year ago
@19checco80 whats that mean?
uperstupid 1 year ago
@uperstupid
Means (in Neapolitan dialect, Naples, Italy): VERY GOOD
19checco80 1 year ago
@19checco80 thanks I have this song on my playlists you should check the playlist out.
uperstupid 1 year ago
Brilliant finish.
fearhasaglare 1 year ago
anyone know where i can get sheet music for this version?
fledgehog 1 year ago
Just listening to this version as compared to the earlier draft, I can see why he hated it. The changes he made are so tiny, so meticulous, I get the sense that he had a really tough time getting it to sound the way he wanted. Ironic that his most popular piece was one we were never intended to hear.
T3hL337Sesshy 1 year ago
wow!!!
cynmaiden1976 1 year ago
the best i've ever heard...better than horowitz, yundi li...probably even ashkenazy..
satyu131089 1 year ago
ROdblIS: the only reason Chopin didn't want the draft version published is because he sold the final version to the Baroness d'Este. If you buy the final edition from Schirmer, you can read all about it in the prologue Rubinstein wrote.
otternox 1 year ago
Wonderful! I wish I could play like him someday! Let's celebrate the 200 years of Chopin's birth!
valcma1 2 years ago
Unbelievable piece Fantasie Impromptu is unbelievable in more ways than one. A true masterpiece!
NagiGseesyou1 2 years ago
Magnifique
tsunade1708 2 years ago
This is absolutely amazing
musicalprodigy7 2 years ago 2
i find the 2nd part could be more mellow and ringing. he plays it in a cut short manner. overall rest very well done.
CrapHoesActNdGo 2 years ago
so flat but still sounds good
BrianDaNoob 2 years ago
@BrianDaNoob yeh, it's like the first note.. "bwahhh" then... all is good after that. ur ears adjust
ilikewiigames 2 years ago 2
@BrianDaNoob actually he changes many notes and i really don't like the first and final part, just the middle that i would say it was singing to some extent.
TrueChristian84 1 year ago
i love love love the sound of this piano!!
Clockmouth 2 years ago
Best I have ever heard so far.
Wonderful, succinct and crisp.
Simply a musical genius...
betta248 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I play the other version. It's better and go watch my video of it.
Type this:
"Mariofan582- Chopin Fantasie Improptu Op.66 in C# Minor"
Mariofan582 2 years ago
A S T O N I S H I N G ! ! !
alexop1 2 years ago
Can someone please send me this final version of this impromptu? Please contact me.
Solstasis 2 years ago
give your email
nanadzdz 2 years ago
@Solstasis buy the urtext edition ^^
BNp03 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
god this song is beautiful....
plopocob 2 years ago 5
So smooth, yet so crisp....
Chuckles543 2 years ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
yet so horny
sharpnova2 2 years ago 20
lol u made me laugh
onewdubu 2 years ago
Rubinstein was the best Chopin period!
tuxdcat 2 years ago 4
hermoso!!! que mas puedo decir es simplemente una de las mejores piezas y una de las mas hermosas que e escuchado en mi vida
susan1195 2 years ago 2
thank u for putting the most beautiful score on here for people to enjoy
XpolyGraphXbitchkidX 2 years ago
Thank you for this beautiful piece of music !!! Love Chopin's music !!!
thuyng9 2 years ago
This performance is a gem. And the final version is far superior to the draft. Rubinstein must have been practicing before this recording :)
gerryrains 2 years ago 2
My favourite interpretation. Thanks for sharing!
Lustre1987 2 years ago 19
i quote, this is very better than any other, for me.
bigifu 2 years ago
@Lustre1987 and my ,too
pmglp 1 year ago
what does it mean by final virsion?
ClassicSteinwayJonas 2 years ago
I have placed Chopin's 1834 first draft of the Fantasie Impromptu on You Tube. Please read the accompanying information.
Beckmesser2 2 years ago 3
Chopin made a few versions of the Fantaisie-impromptu. This is the Final developed version Chopin produced. Every note played is meant to compliment the first and proceeding note with a balance of grace and agitation. This method produces an atmosphere of a beauteous despair with a longing for freedom. This piece balances chaos and harmony, and for that it is my favorite.
marcsfutures 1 year ago 21
@marcsfutures the way you described that made me want to cry lol but your right :)
layfon08 1 year ago
@marcsfutures I love how it sounds. Sounds really graceful and full~
ShakerLouie 1 year ago
@marcsfutures Absolutely true!..and wonderfully said!!!:)
TheMorning7dew 1 year ago
@Beckmesser2 The accompanying information simply says it's on youtube. Could you post a link because you have over 500 videos so sift through-
itsanthonyhere 1 year ago
wow!this song is really beautiful!
mangafeli 2 years ago
i still like the other version more... the small changes in this one make it sound less powerful in some places although it could have a bit to do with the interpretation as well
uknowurright9 3 years ago
Keep in mind, the story behind this song was that Chopin made it up on the fly basically. He was playing a concert and just whipped this thing up, so god only knows what the original sounded like. Plus, after he wrote it, he wished he never had because he hated it to the day he died.
ROdblS 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
CrimsonSora 2 years ago
straordinario.
RenzoFaber 3 years ago
kokot
pacholino 2 years ago
owned
sdthird10 3 years ago
do you have the sheet music for this version?
pinkanimesmiles 3 years ago
i have, but i don't think it is the final version...
jordanbbuu 3 years ago
Maybe Henle or others has published this version.
aewanko300 3 years ago
So cool to hear an "alternate" version of a famous piece like this! Thanks for posting!
j67123 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah... Except it's written Fantaisie-Impromptu.
Cleroth 3 years ago