The conventional engine rings are equal in all its extension. In this type of engine the interior area is different than the outer area (hence the ring) will have to be irregular, to fit the cylinder friction what? What about the injetor or spark plug?
Clever design! Should be able to run on diesel as well? The opposing pistons remind me of the Napier Deltic engines, but they're not rotary engines....
right, for those of us younger children (im 14) who care about the environment, and arent geniuses, can you help us out by putting this in simple language?
too many chances of something going wrong with this motor. There are pressure differences opposing all over which would not make this an exact process unless it's controlled by some super computer which would then defeat the purpose of the mechanical device.
The only Problem With this is, If you knew something about physics you would know that for the piston to spin freely like that it would never work due to the explosion pushing both pistons apart, therfore it wold be just like pushing the pistons apart and then back together.
Very interesting concept. Does it have any practical application? I don't see how the power would be readily usable with this design having no output connection. I'm having trouble visualizing it (inertia from the case maybe?) Any idea on how much power it would produce? I would think it would be a rather slow "RPM" engine. Is this true?
Dont get me wrong its a great design! I would have never thought of it! but i dont see how the fireing piston is gona stop before it runs slap into the back of the piston infront of it, or how it would lubircate, or how the pistons fireing in the cirlce would inturn spin a flywheel.
how would this rotate an axle, there no attachments point or actual rotating shaft, only rotational translations, which cant be converted into axle rotation
The concept is brilliant. My comment is this: get rid of the music, and consult with someone who speaks English before you present a potentially important idea. The current text is nonsense.
you are right: this video originally had a duration of 120 seconds and in this time-stretched version the text runs too fast ...
fortunately, the text has no close connection with the theme of each frame, so you can watch the animation only, and then you can read the text, that follows:
{1} AIM += Z AIM syn ison Z presents and ... overturns ! THE Toroidal Hermetic Engine a really Piston Engine ! a purely Rotary Engine ! an Idea so simple ! as overturning, too !
{2} Toroidal Pistons moving in pure Rotation, in Cooperating Pairs, inside conjugate hollow Toroidal Shell, with equally distributed Units, each being called Stathmos (Station), define specified Volumes, Variable and also Moving; in this way is possible to be performed whichever Volume Variation Cycle THERMODYNAMIC or NOT !
{3} after the end of this Volume Variation Cycle is performed one more purely Kinematic Procedure during of which the each time Cooperating Pistons move, staying in contact, to the next Stathmos; this Procedure is revolutionary and is called, as a new term, Meta Stathmeusis;
{4} the resultant of this addition Extended Kinematic Cycle is repeated perpetually as every single Piston performs the same Motion successively with Phase Difference in an endless alternation; this Operation is revolutionary and is called, as a new term, Diadocho Kinesis;
{6} Machine Synthesis: Oligo Lithic Machine Analysis: Doric Logic Video Production: Pro/ENGINEER Video Editing: Adobe Premiere Music Theme: CHI MAI by Ennio Morricone Intellectual Property: Panos B. Zaraphonitis SPARTA 2005
for the moment we have concentrated our forces to make a successful second working prototype with an advanced Otto Cycle.
there is another model designed for Diesel Cycle, but it is rather complicated in comparison with the one of Otto Cycle, so we will continue this design after our feedback of the testing of the current prototype.
Napier Deltic engine?! - bingo ! :)
you are the first who relates this concept with the Napier one!
in fact there are many similarities & much more differences between them:
in Napier engine there are six pistons arranged in three permanent couples, while in this THE DOT (ypsilon phase) version there are six pistons arranged in six variable (in a rolling way) couples & in the last publishable THE DOT (chi phase) version (see the other videos of this channel) there are three variable (in a rolling way) couples of pistons!
of course, Napier is not a rotary engine, as you have already noticed!
@pssmferrari He doesnt.. Check the song Remember the name (there are two vids, check out both) they have like 8K thumbs.. I also saw a vid today and one comment had 40,000 thumbs up.. I ll try to find it.
you can find the way that pistons are kinematically interconnected with each other and with the main shaft, watching the other videos and reading the relative comments of this (synison) channel, or studying the drawings and the description of the previous (WO 2007 125373) or the last (WO 2009 040588) international application.
thank you for your nice comments and correct notes!
for a classic Otto or Diesel Cycle there is need of SIX moving parts, in total, including the pistons interconnecting transmission mechanism and the output shaft.
for an Atkinson Cycle or any other more or much more advanced Cycle with many additional improving procedures there is need of SEVEN moving parts.
in general, there is need of FIVE to SEVEN moving parts for any case, from simplest to extremely complicated.
how are people getting so many likes on the comments their are people with over 2000 likes in the commenting area
ZmasterM 1 month ago 2
thumbs up if you are here to see kjaks's comment
LetgoGeriDon 1 month ago
I know what im doing tonight...
rober300300 1 month ago
noi tuin jion kim lop un tun re fu fi ke cheun
gamefaqsandcheats 1 month ago
ku joi hu utngy tuin
gamefaqsandcheats 1 month ago
doing doing bu butt koin du chen doodoo qui nazi du.
gamefaqsandcheats 1 month ago
nieug loing eng jui li yuniop.
gamefaqsandcheats 1 month ago
i concur
alexherrera84 1 month ago
I'm here to see the comment with the most thumbs ups ever.
YOU ARE MY HERO @kjaks
ColloquiallyGaming 1 month ago 15
hnmetyjsaerhriegjáeroigrsgóiubrh´soiruhbtv´0ositrnhgóirehgóriehg´perihogóiseh´g9o4gh´9oghpidrursipughperiui............like
MrTNTexplosion 2 months ago
R.I.P. headphone user
TheShitCan 2 months ago
I think I might get it now. The pistons are stationaery and the cylinders rotate ?
matsteve 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
37735 views and 2072 thumbs up for a comment? WTF?!
SweeetLoo 2 months ago
A very cool idea, but how would this be used to propel a vehicle? Are these pistons connected to some kind of crankshaft? and how?
matsteve 2 months ago 5
I am so scared right now...
giliam415 2 months ago
is confused
SyntakHD 2 months ago
Meh
JamezGotSwag 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
34'000 views and 70 comments, that's normal, that's ok.
but here, 2043 LIKES for 1 comment ? WHAT THA FUCK ??
And the comment is not like everyone could understand it, only people with know-how can understand it well.
SO WTF ? ?
This is bizarre
dmxezz 2 months ago
The conventional engine rings are equal in all its extension. In this type of engine the interior area is different than the outer area (hence the ring) will have to be irregular, to fit the cylinder friction what? What about the injetor or spark plug?
coftheworld 2 months ago
watever this is its kool!! :D
DaTop321 2 months ago
bvbv
murad7619 2 months ago
I used to design engines like you butt then I too........ wait I have a life!
hulksmash911911 2 months ago
lololol
srgotinhas 2 months ago
AMAZING IDEA!!!! :D
goodpasterdestinyyah 2 months ago 27
Thumbs up if you are watching in 2011!
goodpasterdestinyyah 2 months ago
@goodpasterdestinyyah
overwrite but add 2012 xD
Ganggamer12 2 months ago
im confused
cocacola6367 2 months ago
YouTube snowflakes? :D
legofan009 2 months ago 2
best thing ever
kirbymcfluff 2 months ago 97
Clever design! Should be able to run on diesel as well? The opposing pistons remind me of the Napier Deltic engines, but they're not rotary engines....
kirbymcfluff 2 months ago 92
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is false
go back to physics class kids
savergaming 2 months ago
right, for those of us younger children (im 14) who care about the environment, and arent geniuses, can you help us out by putting this in simple language?
Mr234rrwe 2 months ago 5
2O MOAR LIKES TO KJAKS AND ITS MY BDAY :D
littledwarfman 2 months ago
UGHH... I don't think I belong here O_O
dmxezz 2 months ago
OMFG! what is it? :c
AsSeenOnRedTube 2 months ago
FIRST
geozhukov 2 months ago 78
This comment has received too many negative votes show
breakdown of this video
20 likes 11 dislikes
one comment with 1957 votes up and one with 954...
BananaSauceFilms 2 months ago
WHAT SONG ?
briesmonis1 2 months ago
THIS IS SPARTA!
proudstr8 2 months ago 36
this is just garbage how do you move the pistons properly.
toh192 2 months ago
I didn´t understand :( I came here because of the thumbs up of the top comments
MrCutiepie90 2 months ago
2000!!! HOLY CRAP
DeathKiller307 2 months ago
too many chances of something going wrong with this motor. There are pressure differences opposing all over which would not make this an exact process unless it's controlled by some super computer which would then defeat the purpose of the mechanical device.
d1drifter87 3 months ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fuck greece!!! Little bastard people.
marashutzi 5 months ago
good idea, but how how do you ensure that the pistons that don't have contact with a combustion phase are not moving?
szlatyka 8 months ago 57
καλο πολυ καλο...
MrLibas007 9 months ago 467
bad idea too much weight.
golem72002 9 months ago
excellent idea ... i wud talk patent it and talk to mazda
kamalmichael 10 months ago 507
@kamalmichael Yeah Ofcoure Excellent idea! Great Job!
pup536 1 month ago 86
The only Problem With this is, If you knew something about physics you would know that for the piston to spin freely like that it would never work due to the explosion pushing both pistons apart, therfore it wold be just like pushing the pistons apart and then back together.
DemonicJoker1 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
At last!An engine that does absolutely nothing but turn itself!Why did I not think of this?heath Robinson would be delighted with this device.
Squarerig 10 months ago
Very interesting concept. Does it have any practical application? I don't see how the power would be readily usable with this design having no output connection. I'm having trouble visualizing it (inertia from the case maybe?) Any idea on how much power it would produce? I would think it would be a rather slow "RPM" engine. Is this true?
ruthlessone3k 1 year ago 274
it's the same as the MyT engine except this one has no power coupling.. doesn't work
DanFrederiksen 1 year ago
thats very neat, also what song is this in the video?
Fotenks 1 year ago 192
Dont get me wrong its a great design! I would have never thought of it! but i dont see how the fireing piston is gona stop before it runs slap into the back of the piston infront of it, or how it would lubircate, or how the pistons fireing in the cirlce would inturn spin a flywheel.
kddcc 1 year ago 315
how would this rotate an axle, there no attachments point or actual rotating shaft, only rotational translations, which cant be converted into axle rotation
QuaziGNRLNose 1 year ago 2
The concept is brilliant. My comment is this: get rid of the music, and consult with someone who speaks English before you present a potentially important idea. The current text is nonsense.
fernando5821 1 year ago 260
i have no doubt about it's design, truely marvellous ! , but how do you plan to transfer this energy into momentum? ie: transmission?
qotsaandsoadfan1 1 year ago 297
hello dear Ray70ss !
thank you for your comment !
you are right: this video originally had a duration of 120 seconds and in this time-stretched version the text runs too fast ...
fortunately, the text has no close connection with the theme of each frame, so you can watch the animation only, and then you can read the text, that follows:
synison 2 years ago
synison 2 years ago
synison 2 years ago
synison 2 years ago
synison 2 years ago
{5}
having the aim to calculate
the Total Work AIM
we accumulate the per
Cycle variable Work Z;
in Programming Language C
this accumulation is written:
AIM += Z
synison 2 years ago
synison 2 years ago
Im inspired. Maybe next time you could slow down the text a little, I couldn't read it fast enough. Thanks
Ray70ss 2 years ago 231
Clever design! Should be able to run on diesel as well? The opposing pistons remind me of the Napier Deltic engines, but they're not rotary engines.
I would enjoy seeing a prototype running.
kjaks 2 years ago 2188
thank you very much dear kjaks!
for the moment we have concentrated our forces to make a successful second working prototype with an advanced Otto Cycle.
there is another model designed for Diesel Cycle, but it is rather complicated in comparison with the one of Otto Cycle, so we will continue this design after our feedback of the testing of the current prototype.
Napier Deltic engine?! - bingo ! :)
you are the first who relates this concept with the Napier one!
{to be continued ...}
synison 2 years ago
in fact there are many similarities & much more differences between them:
in Napier engine there are six pistons arranged in three permanent couples, while in this THE DOT (ypsilon phase) version there are six pistons arranged in six variable (in a rolling way) couples & in the last publishable THE DOT (chi phase) version (see the other videos of this channel) there are three variable (in a rolling way) couples of pistons!
of course, Napier is not a rotary engine, as you have already noticed!
synison 2 years ago
@kjaks you have a lot of likes
alex86488 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@kjaks fuck you bastard i wish you live 1938 seconds from now on idiot!
aekoriginale21 2 months ago
@aekoriginale21 your such an idiot
TheHunter3895 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@kjaks wut the fuk. y is this liked so much? this isnt normal guys!!!!!
MetalHeadAtHeart1 2 months ago
@kjaks dude have u ever checked how many likes your comment has? ;)
DerBlutspender 2 months ago
@kjaks the fack?
saltyxxbawlz 2 months ago
@kjaks I've never seen sooooooo many thumbs up before.
zXYOMAMA2120Xz 2 months ago 10
@zXYOMAMA2120Xz this is the comment with the most thumbs up on YT i think
MrLDiabolo 2 months ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrLDiabolo NO!:d SEARCH ON YOUTUBE:
OVER THE RAINBOW'
TAKE NUMBER 1 VIDEO
THERE IS THE MOST THUMBED UP COMMENT ON YOUTUBE!
DO IT FAST!
THUMBS UP FOR THIS COMMENT, SO EVERYBODY CAN SEE IT!
3niman88 2 months ago
@kjaks well 1986 thumbs up! unbelievable!
TheAbrenica 2 months ago 14
@kjaks holy thumbs up!
Psycho176 2 months ago 4
@kjaks congrats, your comment is the most thumbed up on YT
newdxfl 2 months ago 16
@kjaks your comment has more likes than the fucking video!
ThePreacherWoody 2 months ago
@kjaks I think you have the highest rated comment in you tube, congratuations, btw nice idea
pssmferrari 2 months ago 7
@pssmferrari He doesnt.. Check the song Remember the name (there are two vids, check out both) they have like 8K thumbs.. I also saw a vid today and one comment had 40,000 thumbs up.. I ll try to find it.
iPurpleSkater 2 months ago
@pssmferrari I remember there was an AC/DC video that had tons of likes on every single comment, and that was loads more :D
TehPureOwnage 2 months ago
@kjaks congrats and 2084 likes XD
Zeath163 1 month ago
@kjaks
lol 2087 thums up :O
RoPEK123xd 1 month ago
@kjaks your my hero!
IAMTHENOTCH 1 month ago 8
WOW, GOOD IDEA!
mesikamoto 2 years ago 1115
thank you !
synison 2 years ago
hello dear acharad and jacopomoro!
you can find the way that pistons are kinematically interconnected with each other and with the main shaft, watching the other videos and reading the relative comments of this (synison) channel, or studying the drawings and the description of the previous (WO 2007 125373) or the last (WO 2009 040588) international application.
synison 2 years ago
*
please, see comments of other videos of this channel
*
synison 3 years ago
How would you transfer the power to the drivetrain ? Inertia ?
acharad 3 years ago
i was thinking the same..
if it would have a constant balance could be have a good application as gyroscopic stabilizator, or sometingh like that, i guess..
jacopomoro 2 years ago
thank you for your nice comments and correct notes!
for a classic Otto or Diesel Cycle there is need of SIX moving parts, in total, including the pistons interconnecting transmission mechanism and the output shaft.
for an Atkinson Cycle or any other more or much more advanced Cycle with many additional improving procedures there is need of SEVEN moving parts.
in general, there is need of FIVE to SEVEN moving parts for any case, from simplest to extremely complicated.
synison 3 years ago
I suppose... too many moving parts...
rotarean 3 years ago
far the smoothest motion!
planetics 3 years ago 364