@Jkun Caesium will ignite in air so you'd have to somehow preserve it in argon/vacuum/nitrogen/etc. otherwise it will instantly catch fire. Then, when you fire it, it will definitely catch fire as soon as it leaves your watergun. When the fiery stream of caesium hits the water it will explode. It's quite likely you'll have dropped your melted watergun and ran away from the fire and explosions realising this was a silly idea as the mound of caesium burns away on the floor.
I guess the only answer is to build a more practical watergun then xD
But yeah, it is probably not something to be attempted without knowing the risks :P
(not that I'm gonna do it, but wouldn't mind seeing someone else create a gun/watergun out of a metal and use it to squirt a whole bunch of that stuff into a pool or something xD)
@kristijanadrian They are all compared in normal temperature conditions, of course if there are massive temperatures even Hidrogen can be more reactive...
@g95jon1 because, francium is highly radioactive and has a half life of a few secounds so you wouldent have enough time to prepare a sample while trying to not get kiled by the radiation and drop it into water, in other words, GOOD LUCK
I still get the feeling that most of the cesium was not involved in the reaction and dispersed as shrapnel. Try putting a bag full of water on top of the cesium and then break the bag. The reaction will disperse the cesium.
I know wiki does not have reputation for the most accurate sources but for scientific information you are usually safe to assume the have their fact right. You can check to see if the information as been thoroughly checked in its' Discussion page.
So if you don't know you facts at lest look it up rather being lazy and asking.
"Caesium has at least 39 known isotopes ranging in atomic mass from 112 to 151. Only one of these, 133Cs, is stable .... Radioactive 135Cs has a long half-life of about 2.3 million years; 137Cs and 134Cs have half-lives of 30 and 2 years, respectively.... The isotopes with atomic masses of 129, 131, 132 and 136, have half-times between a day and two weeks"
And then is goes on to talk about the others lasting a few hours to fractions of second.
@crinoid1919 Isn't it steam? That reaction must produce a lot of heat, which turns water from the container into steam. I may be wrong though, i'm not a chemist :P
I was about to comment saying "No WAY is that Caesium, that was waaaay too reactive to be Caesium, it's probably Rubidium you have there or something...". Then I noticed the size of the piece you were using xD
lol, it would be awesome but it is unstable and the atom would break apart before anyone could put it in water. And who would risk their life anyway...?! XD
Set up a donation box and buy a Casio, 200 quid can't be that hard for a science department to come up with! 210 or 420 fps won't be too revealing for a reaction that fast, but it is certainly going to look a lot better, and there are dozens other uses you can put it to - not to mention you can have the IT guys hack it. Or wait for the next model.
I would guess that it is the same as all other group 1 metals with water. Caesium + Water -> Caesium Hydroxide + Hydrogen Gas with the hydroxide dissosiated to the ceasium + ion and -OH
Part of me is betting that the reaction is so fast that a high-speed camera wouldn't give much more information than the cameras that are already being used.
@Sean - I could be wrong about this but I was told by a lecturer if you dropped a large sample of Caesium into a large body of water the sample would sink and the water would quench the reaction due to Caesium having a higher density than water, so you would need to keep the body of water fairly shallow.
The first reaction (cesium + water --> cesium hydroxide + hydrogen gas) would go with or without exposure to oxygen. The hydrogen gas produced would not burn in absence of oxygen, of course.
I don't know how more water would quench the reaction, other than by impeding the burning of hydrogen. I'm now curious how the reaction looks if the hydrogen does not burn.
As i've said, next time you want to do something like this, let us know in advance. You've got over 15,000 subscribers on the periodic videos channel. 5 or $10 from just 20% of them would raise enough money to buy a LOT of cesium.. Big boom in a swimming pool!
You need a better method to expose the cesium. I commented on the main video: use ultrasonic vibration to make a colloid of cesium in oil, then soak that into cloth (or an inert powder?). Then either dump a lot of water onto the cloth, or onto the spread out powder.
@nottinghamscience: Thanks for the video. It would be great if you could acquire a digital camera like the Casio High Speed EXILIM family that can shoot at 1000 frames per second. For example the EX-FC100WE is only 300$.
and now the water is super caustic and would cause chemical burns
AlternateArtisan 1 week ago
i REALLY HATE how all these youtube vids are like 1mg cesium in water.
go big or go home? get like a golf ball sized one and throw it in a like 50 ft away!!
iwillavengeyou 2 weeks ago
@iwillavengeyou
That's fine, we'll just let you pay for the caesium!
98JMA 2 weeks ago
@iwillavengeyou and you're like watching this for free on the internet...
Draphcone 2 hours ago
I think the chemical formula is 2CeOH + H2. Is it right?
WinAndLinuxTutorials 1 month ago
@WinAndLinuxTutorials 2 Cs+2 H2O = 2 CsOH + H2 - exoterm
Wildm0use 1 week ago
makes a good laxative...
xD
ninpohimiko 1 month ago
Another waste of a glass bowl....
lisa850331 2 months ago
there is no use trying to find Francium with water, Because there is only 20–30 g that exists at any given time throughout the Earth's crust
CallfredYT 2 months ago
@CallfredYT Also, it's so incredibly radioactive that an explosion would be a mild paper cut in comparison.
HYEYBT 1 month ago
imagine caesium plunged into liquid fluorine.
falloutfreek1992 2 months ago
@falloutfreek1992 i'm gonna have wet dreams about that tonight :P
nybotheveg 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@falloutfreek1992 would not work no hydrogen
Paurmon6101 2 months ago
@falloutfreek1992 It would divide by zero.
iNFamousAAC 2 months ago
Looks like reverse Wadsworth constant applies here. The most condensed information being the first 30%.
Darkemperer 3 months ago
Caesium Plus? That a brand of cracker?
denelson83 3 months ago 2
Caesium and H2SO4
Loui5D 3 months ago
Now time for Francium
HellDareTHD 4 months ago
what would happen if you had a LOT of caesium and were able to put it in a watergun
and fire a constant stream of it into a pool or other body of water?
~Jkun~
Jkun 5 months ago
@Jkun Caesium will ignite in air so you'd have to somehow preserve it in argon/vacuum/nitrogen/etc. otherwise it will instantly catch fire. Then, when you fire it, it will definitely catch fire as soon as it leaves your watergun. When the fiery stream of caesium hits the water it will explode. It's quite likely you'll have dropped your melted watergun and ran away from the fire and explosions realising this was a silly idea as the mound of caesium burns away on the floor.
LiamCrowley1990 4 months ago
@LiamCrowley1990
I guess the only answer is to build a more practical watergun then xD
But yeah, it is probably not something to be attempted without knowing the risks :P
(not that I'm gonna do it, but wouldn't mind seeing someone else create a gun/watergun out of a metal and use it to squirt a whole bunch of that stuff into a pool or something xD)
~Jkun~
Jkun 4 months ago
@Jkun It would explode as soon as you fire it, even BEFORE it touches the water, In fact, it would explode IN your watergun.
Ryanlauph 4 months ago
@Ryanlauph
That may be, but I still like the idea :P
~Jkun~
Jkun 4 months ago
Really useful, thanks:)
bbawor 6 months ago
kewl
supakiwibaby 7 months ago
Comment removed
fluorescentcentipede 7 months ago
Thats what Chuck Norris uses for tea
4espritdrummer 7 months ago 4
What about alcohol?
Novinte 8 months ago
How much cesium did you use there?
MagnificentBurger 8 months ago
My Chemistry students always thought it was funny to say "sleazy -m" instead of caesium! hehe!
tbdonnelly67 8 months ago
How sparse is cesium as an accessible mineral on this planet?
tube2a 8 months ago
Cs+H2O->2say your prayers+bad idea+big bang
TheShiftyLetsplayer 9 months ago
@TheShiftyLetsplayer lol
wildfyah 9 months ago
@HelixProtocol That would be excellent a 1kg block of caesium in a bucket of conc HCL would make a top video
MrMaltbread 9 months ago
Imagine Francium in water, LOL !
Ihateflagging123 9 months ago
I thought caseium would be stronger then sodium?
alex054739 10 months ago
Try and get francium in water
vulcathene 10 months ago
@vulcathene good luck. There's like 8 atoms in existence.
thetruebluemonkey 10 months ago
Does the cesium sublimate to gas that quickly or what is the end result?
pillroller88 10 months ago
@pillroller88 Caesium reacts with water, liberating hydrogen gas and leaving a solution of caesium hydroxide.
0mniaV1nc1t 8 months ago
@kristijanadrian They are all compared in normal temperature conditions, of course if there are massive temperatures even Hidrogen can be more reactive...
micas96 10 months ago
but whats better than that.... i left to eat dinner and laid my headset on the laptop fan and now i have a heated headset
shidoink 1 year ago
@DeathIzurfriend u'd be killed by then, probably i could blow up dr merrick's class! (chemistry teacher from year 7... never liked her!)
MissViolet241 1 year ago
Why doesn't anyone have some Francium to be blown up?!?!?!?!?!
g95jon1 1 year ago
@g95jon1 because, francium is highly radioactive and has a half life of a few secounds so you wouldent have enough time to prepare a sample while trying to not get kiled by the radiation and drop it into water, in other words, GOOD LUCK
boscostix42 1 year ago
Is it now Caesium hydroxide wich is corrosive?
ELLo1997 1 year ago
Comment removed
aurora2109green 1 year ago
I still get the feeling that most of the cesium was not involved in the reaction and dispersed as shrapnel. Try putting a bag full of water on top of the cesium and then break the bag. The reaction will disperse the cesium.
michalchik 1 year ago
That was so cool
clarkloveselevators 1 year ago
I know wiki does not have reputation for the most accurate sources but for scientific information you are usually safe to assume the have their fact right. You can check to see if the information as been thoroughly checked in its' Discussion page.
So if you don't know you facts at lest look it up rather being lazy and asking.
crazydave303 1 year ago
caesium-133 is not radio active
Clipped from Wiki:
"Caesium has at least 39 known isotopes ranging in atomic mass from 112 to 151. Only one of these, 133Cs, is stable .... Radioactive 135Cs has a long half-life of about 2.3 million years; 137Cs and 134Cs have half-lives of 30 and 2 years, respectively.... The isotopes with atomic masses of 129, 131, 132 and 136, have half-times between a day and two weeks"
And then is goes on to talk about the others lasting a few hours to fractions of second.
crazydave303 1 year ago
im curious what the smoke is make up of
crinoid1919 1 year ago
@crinoid1919 Isn't it steam? That reaction must produce a lot of heat, which turns water from the container into steam. I may be wrong though, i'm not a chemist :P
CastorVigilant 1 year ago
@crinoid1919 its hydrogen gas ^^
HyperBob0007 1 year ago
I've tried throwing sodium and potassium cubes in nitric, sulphuric and hydrochloric acids. Now it's your turn to do that with caesium (!!)
pchk1 1 year ago
Teabaggers!
bdf2718 1 year ago
where do you guys get caesium?
adaksaheb 1 year ago
@adaksaheb dont be an idiot......
darkace355 1 year ago
How about a Cesium filled capsule with a jelly bean coating = One mean prank.lol
marcuelcajon 1 year ago
Francium in water has never been tried. Imagine if it did....
zeeshan55 1 year ago
Fransium is a very rare metal. The longest living francium isotope has a half life of only 22 mins.
adaksaheb 1 year ago
@zeeshan55 that's gonna be the most watched video in the universe
ma356289 1 year ago
I was about to comment saying "No WAY is that Caesium, that was waaaay too reactive to be Caesium, it's probably Rubidium you have there or something...". Then I noticed the size of the piece you were using xD
Lukex115 2 years ago
@Lukex115
Caesium is more reactive than Rubidium..... What are you talking about.
Dobility 2 years ago 38
@Dobility it is its lower on the alkali metal scale.
sabin12197 3 months ago
yeyeyeyeye
zzyzybynsky 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Alkali Metals arent radioactive...
WackyWadslow 2 years ago
Francium is.
troodon9999 2 years ago 21
@troodon9999 francium is the rarest element on earth
flametiger2 1 month ago
Aww, where's Francium?
HateMadeFlesh 2 years ago
lol, it would be awesome but it is unstable and the atom would break apart before anyone could put it in water. And who would risk their life anyway...?! XD
SFXgalore 2 years ago
It'll be like a depth charge. :D
HateMadeFlesh 2 years ago
radioactive!!!!!!!!!!
plus there's not enough on earth to do this type of experiment with!!!
flemish4 2 years ago
haha wrong this is a demonstration not an experiment
keyloggersfiles 1 year ago
An Alkali Metal*
MoshinGerNade 2 years ago
somewhere not here. Francium have 22min of halflife, after this, this start degrading.
hyrael2 2 years ago
I wonder why they used kalium instead of caesium on mytbusters ;)
bommobiel 2 years ago
Because potassium is cheaper that cesium
TutorialGeneration 2 years ago
Then*
TutorialGeneration 2 years ago
Than*
randomdude32 2 years ago 8
I wonder why they didnt used the "Mythbusters" tv show tecnique, of breaking the ampole under the water to cause a massive explosion.
Draxis32 2 years ago
IS that steam coming off, or smoke from the oil?
Envergure 2 years ago
It's Both Steam from this very exotermic reaction, but also combined with Hydrogen that the reacton releases
Draxis32 2 years ago
that is the hydrogen released from dissociating the H2O molecules
BlackVirusxz 2 years ago
pause at 1:26 you see 2 glowing pieces falling
ewinjo 2 years ago 2
Sweeeeet
waterfat 2 years ago
it would be worth while to invest in high speed cameras
sailtheseaofcheese 2 years ago 50
@sailtheseaofcheese: I'd love one..... we do try to keep our costs down though! :)
what's the cheapest one you've seen?
nottinghamscience 2 years ago 20
Set up a donation box and buy a Casio, 200 quid can't be that hard for a science department to come up with! 210 or 420 fps won't be too revealing for a reaction that fast, but it is certainly going to look a lot better, and there are dozens other uses you can put it to - not to mention you can have the IT guys hack it. Or wait for the next model.
bananarama666 2 years ago
@nottinghamscience you can get some cheap cameras that have a highspeed ability quality is not the best but it works :)
panzuman 1 year ago
@nottinghamscience there is the Casio EX-FH20 that can do 1000 fps and its quite cheap too.
CWSFDavid 1 year ago
@nottinghamscience Probably Viewty.
jjovereats 11 months ago
@nottinghamscience Viewty.
jjovereats 11 months ago
yea, I thought it was going to be shot with a high speed camera, but its actually just played back a slower speed, lame.
jnthnbush 2 years ago
Whether there is a technology to return metal in an initial condition? And how many energy is required for this purpose?
sslobodsky 2 years ago
Michael Bay will be on the phone, I guarantee it.
P0rphyro 2 years ago
what is casium?
Starlababy 2 years ago
google ceasium
HeroinMethod 2 years ago 2
Caesium the day!
Thanks once again for some wonderful, scientifical videos!
johnclavis 2 years ago 2
I would guess that it is the same as all other group 1 metals with water. Caesium + Water -> Caesium Hydroxide + Hydrogen Gas with the hydroxide dissosiated to the ceasium + ion and -OH
GeneralTagatashi 2 years ago
What is the 'by product' of this reaction? is the gas left behind the only by product of the reaction?
320iguy 2 years ago
much more impressive than the first time you tried this!
juggliac 2 years ago 3
Very nice. Shame you have not got a super slow motion camera though.
itsabomberscope 2 years ago
Part of me is betting that the reaction is so fast that a high-speed camera wouldn't give much more information than the cameras that are already being used.
qwAirGear 2 years ago
@Sean - I could be wrong about this but I was told by a lecturer if you dropped a large sample of Caesium into a large body of water the sample would sink and the water would quench the reaction due to Caesium having a higher density than water, so you would need to keep the body of water fairly shallow.
GeneralTagatashi 2 years ago 2
The first reaction (cesium + water --> cesium hydroxide + hydrogen gas) would go with or without exposure to oxygen. The hydrogen gas produced would not burn in absence of oxygen, of course.
I don't know how more water would quench the reaction, other than by impeding the burning of hydrogen. I'm now curious how the reaction looks if the hydrogen does not burn.
octareenroon91 2 years ago
1:02 AMAZING!!
Timbo992 2 years ago 2
As i've said, next time you want to do something like this, let us know in advance. You've got over 15,000 subscribers on the periodic videos channel. 5 or $10 from just 20% of them would raise enough money to buy a LOT of cesium.. Big boom in a swimming pool!
seanbrockest 2 years ago 17
@seanbrockest: Cheers... I think you're optimistic thinking 20% of our subscribers would part with money, but who knows...
To be honest, we could probably scratch together the cash for a bigger sample, but safety issues would need to be considered.
In fact, if you watch our first ever caesium video you'll see we have a massive sample in storage already!
nottinghamscience 2 years ago 2
You need a better method to expose the cesium. I commented on the main video: use ultrasonic vibration to make a colloid of cesium in oil, then soak that into cloth (or an inert powder?). Then either dump a lot of water onto the cloth, or onto the spread out powder.
GetMeThere1 2 years ago
@nottinghamscience: Thanks for the video. It would be great if you could acquire a digital camera like the Casio High Speed EXILIM family that can shoot at 1000 frames per second. For example the EX-FC100WE is only 300$.
Check some videos on youtube: "casio fps"
kyromaster 2 years ago
@seanbrockest GO BIG OR GO HOME!!! I say evryone gives $50 then they take a pane full and drop gallons into the ocean!!!!!
olivia614 6 months ago
Look close at 1:23 two pieces of metal are actually shooting like bullets out of the water.
jfcrow1 2 years ago
Cool Slow motion.
jfcrow1 2 years ago