Smart-ass, it's called Crypto Zoology, it's not magical, it's the study of HIDDEN and scientifically UNPROVEN creatures, which is why they're called 'cryptids.'
Even though this film was later (accidentally) shown to be a boat, it's still better than the videos of waves and bubbles that we get today. I'm not sure today what Nessie really is (or was) but as I get older I think less and less that if she ever was there, that she still is. That being said I would still love to go there myself someday and have a look. Regardless, its a gorgeous place.
@selmalover Seriously? Wow. Looks like I have a new trophy holder for "Biggest Troll". It was proven to be a boat. Several years ago. Go look the contrast enhanced photos up if you can spell. Dinsdale didn't know it when he filmed it and so the findings weren't released until after his death out of respect. You however, are a small, insignificant blip on the radar of things that matter. Work on that.
@Madams1977 I did looked it up cunt the enhanced pictures, according to some scientists showed what it appeared to be a dorsal flippers, no i ain't saying it was the monster or anything you dumb trick, it was after it was released it was thought to be a boat but later when it was enhanced it showed, like i said, what looked to be a dorsal fin so fuck you and your momma and all your family!! GO EAT A DICK BITCH AND DIE!! KILL YOURSELF!!
@lina107 indeed it is. There is another scene where the thing swims parallel to the shore and some further analyses have suggested it is just a boat and that a spot on the side is the man on the boat. However, I equally think it could be a second hump.
Photoshop have not existed yet, along with Paint. Heck, they didn't even had BIOS yet or were there any proper editing tools that can pull that off.
The most we could say is that some douche wore a hat and swam while pulling a lump in the middle of the night in the dark and this guy who was going on with his life just happen to see the damn thing. Psh, heck I might be wrong and maybe someone invented enhancive photo editing earlier but still, looks real.
I was part of Operation Deepscan, by the way so I KNOW Dinsdale's film was not analysed as part of it. Loch Ness Uncovered (I don't have a copy) must have made a mistake.
Oh, and yes, the Naked Science used the same man who had done the original analysis for JARIC giving him the chance to correct his mistake, which he did cheerfully. Stop hanging on to this 1960 film (that's why it is not HD Stratospk) of a boat. If monsters in Loch Ness behaved like that there would no longer be a mystery!!!!
Groyneyvision, don't you read anything? Operation Deepscan was nothing to do with analysis of the Dinsdale film. It was Naked Science where it was exposed as a boat - mistake probably, not deliberate. With photoshop you can perform the same experiment. Take multiple frames where the object is moving parallel to the shore then superimposed them, lining up the front of the "wake" in each frame to exactly the same position. Now make all the frames 10% transparency &, lo & behold - a man in a boat.
There are lots of interesting and erroneous comments to this film. Firstly Deepscan was an expedition and did not analysis the Dinsdale film. The Dinsdale film was conclusively shown to be a boat in the Naked Science documentary which used a stereoscopic system to show that there really is a man in the back of a boat in the sequence where the boat moves parallel to the shore.
As for removing all this Nessie rubbish. There is actually more to this than meets the eye, although not plesiosaurs.
@InvernessToursDOTcom I'd recommend you watch 'Loch Ness Uncovered' for confirmation that a person who was part of Operation Deepscan analysed the film. And, of course, conclusively proved that ... nothing could be proven except that it was not a boat!
This cine film was analysed by both JARIC (a miltary data centre) and Operation Deepscan, which the latter analysis which was shown by The Discovery Channel (on the documetary Loch Ness Uncovered). Both concluded that the film showed an as yet unidentified creature.
@SailorxVenus Yeah no kidding. It's a fallacy called an argument to ignorance. This is when you say that something is true or untrue because it has or has not been proven or disproven. Aka "The Loch Ness monster is a myth because no one has proven it to be true". On the other side, saying that it's real because no one has proved that it isn't is a fallacy as well. Intellectual arrogance is deadly folks, critical thinking is the cure! Or.. a bullet, whichever you like
Well, I have been studying her for years, and a while ago I had this video on my channel, but I edited it and removed some blur, and it is DEFINITELY not a boat :) However, I am a bit skeptical... I would LOVE it if she was a plesio. or some other type of crypto, but only time will tell...
someone has been on the vodka, family guy, yes family guy does exist, hes a cartoon character, nessy never existed as a real mamal, animal, fish watever - russian tossers
please take all this loch ness crap off youtube please, there was nor is any monster, its getting a little cumbersome after all these years. people with commonsense would tell u that a monster could not survive without an adequate food supply. please take all nessy clips off
@flyscreen99 well thousands of animals did survived sharks turtle etc. maybe the cientist that we have today there are to freaking blind...or nasa take all the subjects in:P
you realise when they checked stocks of fish in loch ness they found 20 in one catch, that was apparently a ninefold increase on previous estimates? i know this is replying to an old comment but w/e
I encourage believers and skeptics alike (I've been both) to read Ronald Binns' The Loch Ness Mystery Solved.
I spent about the first 25 years of my life believing in Nessie with all my heart, but reading Binn's book was a real revelation. It's like being convinced that the sawing a lady in half trick is actually some sort of supernatural phenomenon and then you stumble across a book on magic tricks and discover what is really going on.
I'm afraid that his book of 'solutions' and explanations is as tenuous as some of the so-called 'evidence'. His book is merely the view of an avowed non-believer and dismisses even the most detailed of evidence in a sometimes very shallow way. An awful lot of his assertions can be argued away as easily as soon of the believers.
The book seriously (and unhappily) challenged my long held beliefs about the phenomenon, but it made more sense than any other book on the subject I had ever read.
For YEARS I have looked for some crushing refutation of Binns but could find none, other than vague ad homs about how "mean" he was or about how his book was rife with inaccuracies, without actually pointing any out specifically.
If you could direct me to a book or article that critically examines his book, I'd be most appreciative.
A computer expert who enhanced the film noticed a shadow in the negative which was not very obvious in the positive. By enhancing and overlaying frames, he found what appeared to be the rear body, the rear flippers, and 1-2 additional humps of a plesiosaur-like body.
He said that: "Before I saw the film, I thought the Loch Ness Monster was a load of rubbish. Having done the enhancement, I'm not so sure".
I saw that, it was in world around us... The dinsdale film is something I know heaps about. the boat theory was written off because when the same enhancement was done it clearly showed a guy hanging off a boat. well the out line of a guy anyway.
I love all the stories about Loch Ness. Im from Scotland and Loch Ness is a very beautiful and to me a scary place haha. The water is sooooo deep (check the story behind Edwards Deep) and god knows how many caves down there. People think nessie isnt real,fair enough. But check out the history of the Loch. All these vids and pics that just so happen to go missing. Im so sure that there is a cover up here. I believe there is something there,and i believe theres more than one!
If an enhancement proves that it's fake, then: 1.) Why is it not availible to the public? (So far as I've seen.) & 2.) How come they've never been able to identify "the man on the boat"?
In 1960, aeronautical engineer Tim Dinsdale filmed a hump crossing the water in a powerful wake unlike that of a boat. JARIC declared that the object was "probably animate".Others were skeptical, saying that the "hump" cannot be ruled out as being a boat,and claimed that when the contrast is increased a man can be clearly seen in a boat.
And if you kept reading the Wikipedia article on Nessie, you might've read this:
In 1993 Discovery Communications made a documentary called Loch Ness Discovered that featured a digital enhancement of the Dinsdale film. A computer expert who enhanced the film noticed a shadow in the negative which was not very obvious in the positive. By enhancing and overlaying frames, he found what appeared to be the rear body, the rear flippers, and 1-2 additional humps of a plesiosaur-like body.
It's quite clearly a dog swimming, probably a black labrador. Watch it again. You can make out the jerky head movements and the ripples caused by the front paws as it swims. The only thing that makes it mysterious is the grainy quality of the video.
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 5 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS
That's all your moms. So this is the famous Dinsdale Film 'eh? Why is it that the low-quality films and pictures are always the best? Maybe people were more honest back then...
Guys come on! Its a comlumbian drug cartell that kidnaps familys to take them back to columbia by boat under the cover of nightfall to have them work as manual labor in the feilds under harsh conditions making there life a living hell... seriously, god, stupid damn people these days.
nice footage
jayjay19822007 1 month ago
To mich pixsils
Metalkitty29 4 months ago
omg if you listen properly you can totally hear it, it is really there
SolgerLemp 5 months ago
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Vipnonyarg 6 months ago
At the time the RAF confirmed it wasn't a boat or submarine but was an animal larger than than any animal recorded in Loch Ness
Stresshedsupergoalie 7 months ago
@Terratrema:
Smart-ass, it's called Crypto Zoology, it's not magical, it's the study of HIDDEN and scientifically UNPROVEN creatures, which is why they're called 'cryptids.'
FlowAzureFox 1 year ago
Even though this film was later (accidentally) shown to be a boat, it's still better than the videos of waves and bubbles that we get today. I'm not sure today what Nessie really is (or was) but as I get older I think less and less that if she ever was there, that she still is. That being said I would still love to go there myself someday and have a look. Regardless, its a gorgeous place.
Madams1977 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Madams1977 You stupid dick sucking cunt it was never revealed to be a boat
selmalover 11 months ago
@selmalover Seriously? Wow. Looks like I have a new trophy holder for "Biggest Troll". It was proven to be a boat. Several years ago. Go look the contrast enhanced photos up if you can spell. Dinsdale didn't know it when he filmed it and so the findings weren't released until after his death out of respect. You however, are a small, insignificant blip on the radar of things that matter. Work on that.
Madams1977 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Madams1977 I did looked it up cunt the enhanced pictures, according to some scientists showed what it appeared to be a dorsal flippers, no i ain't saying it was the monster or anything you dumb trick, it was after it was released it was thought to be a boat but later when it was enhanced it showed, like i said, what looked to be a dorsal fin so fuck you and your momma and all your family!! GO EAT A DICK BITCH AND DIE!! KILL YOURSELF!!
selmalover 11 months ago
is this dinsdale's film?
lina107 1 year ago
@lina107 indeed it is. There is another scene where the thing swims parallel to the shore and some further analyses have suggested it is just a boat and that a spot on the side is the man on the boat. However, I equally think it could be a second hump.
PahangDragonbird 8 months ago
That's a log floating around.
Oh. No. Maybe not. I guess most likely it's a prehistoric creature that has survived in a Scottish Loch all on its own for thousands of years.
Look, I wanna believe in magical beings too. But is THIS really the best we got?
terratrema 1 year ago
Photoshop in 1960? Are you serious? =.=
Photoshop have not existed yet, along with Paint. Heck, they didn't even had BIOS yet or were there any proper editing tools that can pull that off.
The most we could say is that some douche wore a hat and swam while pulling a lump in the middle of the night in the dark and this guy who was going on with his life just happen to see the damn thing. Psh, heck I might be wrong and maybe someone invented enhancive photo editing earlier but still, looks real.
Crusism 1 year ago 2
maybe its a fish
heartbounceful 1 year ago
photoshopped!
Blamefulrednas 1 year ago
@Blamefulrednas Photoshop 1960? Dont think so.
Dr4k3fullOn3 1 year ago 2
Omg a black dot maybe it's an alien!
spyware60 1 year ago
@spyware60 haha, touché :p
dubstepgoeswom 1 year ago
A film of a boat. Nice.
eminboztepe 1 year ago
That is the best footage of nessie ever. On wikipedia it says a man can be seen clearly. What are they talking about?!
internation123 1 year ago
I was part of Operation Deepscan, by the way so I KNOW Dinsdale's film was not analysed as part of it. Loch Ness Uncovered (I don't have a copy) must have made a mistake.
InvernessToursDOTcom 1 year ago
Oh, and yes, the Naked Science used the same man who had done the original analysis for JARIC giving him the chance to correct his mistake, which he did cheerfully. Stop hanging on to this 1960 film (that's why it is not HD Stratospk) of a boat. If monsters in Loch Ness behaved like that there would no longer be a mystery!!!!
InvernessToursDOTcom 1 year ago
Groyneyvision, don't you read anything? Operation Deepscan was nothing to do with analysis of the Dinsdale film. It was Naked Science where it was exposed as a boat - mistake probably, not deliberate. With photoshop you can perform the same experiment. Take multiple frames where the object is moving parallel to the shore then superimposed them, lining up the front of the "wake" in each frame to exactly the same position. Now make all the frames 10% transparency &, lo & behold - a man in a boat.
InvernessToursDOTcom 1 year ago
There are lots of interesting and erroneous comments to this film. Firstly Deepscan was an expedition and did not analysis the Dinsdale film. The Dinsdale film was conclusively shown to be a boat in the Naked Science documentary which used a stereoscopic system to show that there really is a man in the back of a boat in the sequence where the boat moves parallel to the shore.
As for removing all this Nessie rubbish. There is actually more to this than meets the eye, although not plesiosaurs.
InvernessToursDOTcom 1 year ago
@InvernessToursDOTcom I'd recommend you watch 'Loch Ness Uncovered' for confirmation that a person who was part of Operation Deepscan analysed the film. And, of course, conclusively proved that ... nothing could be proven except that it was not a boat!
Groyneyvision 1 year ago
How come this isnt HD?
stratospk 1 year ago 3
This cine film was analysed by both JARIC (a miltary data centre) and Operation Deepscan, which the latter analysis which was shown by The Discovery Channel (on the documetary Loch Ness Uncovered). Both concluded that the film showed an as yet unidentified creature.
Groyneyvision 1 year ago
To all believers: The Loch Ness Monster is a myth, regardless of what you have "seen", "heard" or what you "know".
TheMikeyReilly 1 year ago
@TheMikeyReilly oh yeah! real good argument there! ....
SailorxVenus 1 year ago
@SailorxVenus Yeah no kidding. It's a fallacy called an argument to ignorance. This is when you say that something is true or untrue because it has or has not been proven or disproven. Aka "The Loch Ness monster is a myth because no one has proven it to be true". On the other side, saying that it's real because no one has proved that it isn't is a fallacy as well. Intellectual arrogance is deadly folks, critical thinking is the cure! Or.. a bullet, whichever you like
Madams1977 1 year ago
i see 2 guys in a boat!
sharksharm 2 years ago
Well, I have been studying her for years, and a while ago I had this video on my channel, but I edited it and removed some blur, and it is DEFINITELY not a boat :) However, I am a bit skeptical... I would LOVE it if she was a plesio. or some other type of crypto, but only time will tell...
Smokeykins 2 years ago
someone has been on the vodka, family guy, yes family guy does exist, hes a cartoon character, nessy never existed as a real mamal, animal, fish watever - russian tossers
flyscreen99 2 years ago
вы ар а морон. го и унират!
Zarcophagus1 2 years ago
please take all this loch ness crap off youtube please, there was nor is any monster, its getting a little cumbersome after all these years. people with commonsense would tell u that a monster could not survive without an adequate food supply. please take all nessy clips off
flyscreen99 2 years ago
stfu, even if it it fake so what? family guy isn't real, should we take out all the clips of that too you fucking idiot?
DrunkAngryRussian 2 years ago
If you live in a lake, I think theres FISH. Smart guy...
jonjojef 2 years ago
@flyscreen99 well thousands of animals did survived sharks turtle etc. maybe the cientist that we have today there are to freaking blind...or nasa take all the subjects in:P
SeeYouInLove 2 years ago
you realise when they checked stocks of fish in loch ness they found 20 in one catch, that was apparently a ninefold increase on previous estimates? i know this is replying to an old comment but w/e
GODLIKE20000 1 year ago
this is fucking fake....
tunjang 2 years ago
Wasn't the Dinsdale film accidentally revealed to be a boat when someone turned up the contrast on the screen one day?
Madams1977 2 years ago
actually, when it was enhanced they found what looked like the head, and flippers.
You are right though, when you increase the contrast, apparently you can see a man in the boat.
Probably fake video but interesting nonetheless.
DrunkAngryRussian 2 years ago 2
Just looks like a boat to me.
markvtos 3 years ago
Dinsdale took this footage from a half-mile away, so it could be anything...
fkovacs1 3 years ago
yes anything but the lock ness monster
grantapuslafsalot 2 years ago
I encourage believers and skeptics alike (I've been both) to read Ronald Binns' The Loch Ness Mystery Solved.
I spent about the first 25 years of my life believing in Nessie with all my heart, but reading Binn's book was a real revelation. It's like being convinced that the sawing a lady in half trick is actually some sort of supernatural phenomenon and then you stumble across a book on magic tricks and discover what is really going on.
SurlyInsomniac 3 years ago
I'm afraid that his book of 'solutions' and explanations is as tenuous as some of the so-called 'evidence'. His book is merely the view of an avowed non-believer and dismisses even the most detailed of evidence in a sometimes very shallow way. An awful lot of his assertions can be argued away as easily as soon of the believers.
Groyney 3 years ago
The book seriously (and unhappily) challenged my long held beliefs about the phenomenon, but it made more sense than any other book on the subject I had ever read.
For YEARS I have looked for some crushing refutation of Binns but could find none, other than vague ad homs about how "mean" he was or about how his book was rife with inaccuracies, without actually pointing any out specifically.
If you could direct me to a book or article that critically examines his book, I'd be most appreciative.
SurlyInsomniac 3 years ago
my eyes hurt !
EmoKickAssChick 3 years ago
"Surface vessel"? I can't tell at what I'm looking. What is the last frame?
sarscastic 3 years ago
A computer expert who enhanced the film noticed a shadow in the negative which was not very obvious in the positive. By enhancing and overlaying frames, he found what appeared to be the rear body, the rear flippers, and 1-2 additional humps of a plesiosaur-like body.
He said that: "Before I saw the film, I thought the Loch Ness Monster was a load of rubbish. Having done the enhancement, I'm not so sure".
Its TRUE....read about it!
Zoostation23 3 years ago
thats directly from wikipedia
IanRuebel 3 years ago 12
yep just read it.
iCheesey 3 years ago 2
I saw that, it was in world around us... The dinsdale film is something I know heaps about. the boat theory was written off because when the same enhancement was done it clearly showed a guy hanging off a boat. well the out line of a guy anyway.
thejodesta 3 years ago
nice job copying off of wikipedia, makes you sound really smart
killer273657 3 years ago
I love all the stories about Loch Ness. Im from Scotland and Loch Ness is a very beautiful and to me a scary place haha. The water is sooooo deep (check the story behind Edwards Deep) and god knows how many caves down there. People think nessie isnt real,fair enough. But check out the history of the Loch. All these vids and pics that just so happen to go missing. Im so sure that there is a cover up here. I believe there is something there,and i believe theres more than one!
Zoostation23 3 years ago
what do u mean , pics and videos went missing ? and yes , i think that if there was to be something in the lake , it's a whole family !
EmoKickAssChick 3 years ago
If an enhancement proves that it's fake, then: 1.) Why is it not availible to the public? (So far as I've seen.) & 2.) How come they've never been able to identify "the man on the boat"?
iPerson 3 years ago
they enhanced it on the discovery channel and they say it may well be real
123johneyg 3 years ago
The Discovery Channel is a joke and should not be taken seriously.
eminboztepe 3 years ago
Apparently if you increase the contrast, you can see a dude in that boat
there has never been good footage of nessie
heatsketch 3 years ago 2
Then you havent seen the 2007 film
oknowiamdead 3 years ago
The Dinsdale film (1960)
In 1960, aeronautical engineer Tim Dinsdale filmed a hump crossing the water in a powerful wake unlike that of a boat. JARIC declared that the object was "probably animate".Others were skeptical, saying that the "hump" cannot be ruled out as being a boat,and claimed that when the contrast is increased a man can be clearly seen in a boat.
lebon007 3 years ago
And if you kept reading the Wikipedia article on Nessie, you might've read this:
In 1993 Discovery Communications made a documentary called Loch Ness Discovered that featured a digital enhancement of the Dinsdale film. A computer expert who enhanced the film noticed a shadow in the negative which was not very obvious in the positive. By enhancing and overlaying frames, he found what appeared to be the rear body, the rear flippers, and 1-2 additional humps of a plesiosaur-like body.
Fool...
moopderg 3 years ago
It's fake.
And anyways its too blurry.
Deemonking 3 years ago
ahhh dude, its 1960
goro95 3 years ago 11
It's quite clearly a dog swimming, probably a black labrador. Watch it again. You can make out the jerky head movements and the ripples caused by the front paws as it swims. The only thing that makes it mysterious is the grainy quality of the video.
tvdd1973 3 years ago
Actually now that u mention that i think you're right haha
Shortpaulio 3 years ago
Probably Joran van der Sloot's friend in a boat.
00rik00 4 years ago
A huge rock floating in loch?
naruto9153 4 years ago
rocks float?
scottmasson01 3 years ago 4
im surprised no one posted a qoute of Napolean Dynomite. Anyway, thanks for posting this, I've been wanting to see this footage
ArchDemon434 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DONT READ THIS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 5 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS
THIS ACTUALLY WORKS sericley!,,,,,,,
nishnif 4 years ago
its way to bluryy . Nobody can tell
Strudel19 4 years ago
What a pity,the cameras at those time weren't excellent like the modern ones,the creature is indefinable.
Piero1940 4 years ago
this is quite a famous sighting filmed by a trained observer.
telemetry9 4 years ago
thanks for uploading this I've been searching for this for a year
rabbitsdoingthedisco 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I like pizza and cupcakes
1Qfan 4 years ago 4
it didnt seem to be moving but had a wake very strange
nessieman 4 years ago 4
upload the ogopogo footage that's better
RaspberryRabies 4 years ago
ohhh Nessie!
kumei917 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Its William Wallace.
MS85ToyotaCrown 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think its a fish coz it was a small object or it was a weed or maybe bark who knows?
Rebel657 4 years ago
A fish?, a weed?, a bark? Yeah right!
NO1GODZILLAFAN 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
:P xOO
Rebel657 4 years ago
a mermaid!! ??? WTF...I THOUGH MERMAIDS WERE FISH-LIKE
paxtranatules 4 years ago
That's all your moms. So this is the famous Dinsdale Film 'eh? Why is it that the low-quality films and pictures are always the best? Maybe people were more honest back then...
Shays47 4 years ago
dats stew chicken with some coca cola drizzled on it
Westmoorings12 4 years ago
that is not the loch ness its actually a creamy home style mash patato with gravy thrown into the water! yeah awesome
jingleplush 4 years ago
This Is Actually Quite Old You Dingbat.
DukeBoyO1 3 years ago
Why Is YoutubeNot Putting These In Teh Proper Place?
DukeBoyO1 3 years ago
That seriously looks like an ocean rock.
ReiPuget13 4 years ago
An ocean rock swimming in the middle of loch!?
Brandonslittlehelper 4 years ago
Guys come on! Its a comlumbian drug cartell that kidnaps familys to take them back to columbia by boat under the cover of nightfall to have them work as manual labor in the feilds under harsh conditions making there life a living hell... seriously, god, stupid damn people these days.
underOATHextreme 4 years ago
It's clearly a sunken UFO.
invisiblhat 4 years ago
I BELIEVE IT'S A MERMAID
edsonso86 4 years ago
That's no moon! It's a space station!
Quickstoptim 4 years ago
ha starwars
xxsappyconexx 4 years ago
That's no canoe! >:-( It's the Loch Ness Monster!
scotchman 4 years ago
A sunken canoe.
erikandreolsen 5 years ago