Added: 4 years ago
From: drhwts
Views: 4,143
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 50€ bet WW3 has started already by 2041. Overpopulation wont be a problem after that.

  • Wait i dont get how we all die.... Are we leaving the planet? hence the name "World Population." If not i dont see the human population dieing so slowly.

    That one person who lived 7 years was funny.

  • It is not going to be, everyone doesn't decrease food consumption and suddenly they have to starve.

    It will more probably be, people gradually are forced to slowly decrease consumption and some may die, but slowly. Eventually the deaths will be enough to steady the population, and everything goes on as normal.

    People like you guys that commented here WILL realize the situation, and so will the governments. But it won't be all panicky, of course not. No one wants that.

  • This is kind of a nonsensical representation.

    The theory of The "J" curve states that population will grow to a precipitous point & then collapse in a VERY short time. As a family [child of the 60s] we have had one child, own one car, no powered toys, bicycle mostly and stay as "minimal" as possible. Population is the one problem NOT being discussed by the powers that be. We're in trouble and those in gov't know it. This is what "WE'VE" been screaming about since the 60s.

  • and you are one

  • humans are a disease, a cancer of this planet, a plague

  • hello Agent Smith!

  • @ziggyvs - i'll take that as a complement :)

  • Why don't you just kill yourself first??

  • @walter0bz

    Your face is a plague of humanity, its cancer

  • hahah!

  • this is very inaccurate... most experts think that the population will probly slow down alot by 2050 at 8-9 billion, then gradually climb 1 billion by 2100

  • i dont think people are dieing off...

    i think people are leaving the earth to conquer space!

  • No where to go but up ye!

  • Does that mean there will be no people in 2700 AD?

  • Comment removed

  • If we do not start to control population, the decrease will NOT be gradual. It will be a sudden die off of billions of ppl in a few years.

    The current infrastructure that brings us food & energy are at near-maximum capacity, and are being run so as to maximize short-term production and not long-term survival. Soon, these systems will break down, & famine and war will cover 1/2 of the world.

  • The numbers decrease after a while because the growth rates are SLOWING, right now. First, while the rates are still positive, the population continue to goes up, but since they are slowing, it's a matter of time to reverse and become negative. Then the population will start declining.

  • in some places the rates will decrease because of malthean factors

  • I'd advocate a worldwide one-child policy, or better still sterilizing at least half of us based on various quality tests. (IQ, conscientiousness, etc etc)

    This would reverse the 'dysgenic' effect of the elites breeding 'Sheeple' (various cultures acheive it in different ways, going on for 1000's of years) ... and would result in greater individual freedom in future.

  • to walter)bz

    There needs be an audit on what is a sustainable world population. The world can only support so many people and past that point it just turns to crap.

    I reckon that the world is going to beset with a catastrophe and then who knows, more authoritarian government, that will make sure that we don't breed ourselves into oblivion.

  • natures' warning - swine-flu.

    coming at the same time as global financial meltdown? too much of a coincidence.

    IMO it seems two competing "super-consciousnesses" - (i)the 'Market', and (ii)'Gaia', both agree... that there are too many of us

  • Teh more peopel i listen ot on here, the more i realise that population control is a good thing.

    Everyone shoudl be goiven a basc intelligence test, and if they fail, they shoudl be sent ot the moon in a rocket.

    If they learn how to land it, on the way, they can have the moon. (naturally, they will have to pay rent, and dig fo rthings on the moon, liek they do in africa).

    OR, we could send the rulers up there, if anyones go thte guts ?

    We coudl "cast tehm down, to ruel the moon" !!

  • im pretty sure it has to do with climate change and things

  • do you know how many billions of tonnes of non essential foodstuffs that are chucked in the garbage each year? out of date potato chips, crisps, mayo, meat gone off, sweets, speciality food, etc. how many tonnes of the food calories and proteins in any given supermarket is thrown away? just reducing the meat intake by 10 %, growing vegetables instead of cow feed would increase food protein production 100 fold. 99% is lost between vegetables and the cow. and... BILLIONS of TONNES of PET FOOD.

  • Perhaps we are being replaced by a superior species....or robots....

  • Comment removed

  • This needs some new information. Why does the population decline after about 60 years in the future? This is totally not accurate.

  • why the ppl are decreasing ??

    you are stupid .

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more