Wait i dont get how we all die.... Are we leaving the planet? hence the name "World Population." If not i dont see the human population dieing so slowly.
It is not going to be, everyone doesn't decrease food consumption and suddenly they have to starve.
It will more probably be, people gradually are forced to slowly decrease consumption and some may die, but slowly. Eventually the deaths will be enough to steady the population, and everything goes on as normal.
People like you guys that commented here WILL realize the situation, and so will the governments. But it won't be all panicky, of course not. No one wants that.
The theory of The "J" curve states that population will grow to a precipitous point & then collapse in a VERY short time. As a family [child of the 60s] we have had one child, own one car, no powered toys, bicycle mostly and stay as "minimal" as possible. Population is the one problem NOT being discussed by the powers that be. We're in trouble and those in gov't know it. This is what "WE'VE" been screaming about since the 60s.
The earth will become a ball of shit rotating about a bigger ball of gas. The remaining inhabitants (who have never invented anything of any kind of redeeming value) won't have the intelligence to build space craft to escape the explosion of the sun.
this is very inaccurate... most experts think that the population will probly slow down alot by 2050 at 8-9 billion, then gradually climb 1 billion by 2100
If we do not start to control population, the decrease will NOT be gradual. It will be a sudden die off of billions of ppl in a few years.
The current infrastructure that brings us food & energy are at near-maximum capacity, and are being run so as to maximize short-term production and not long-term survival. Soon, these systems will break down, & famine and war will cover 1/2 of the world.
The numbers decrease after a while because the growth rates are SLOWING, right now. First, while the rates are still positive, the population continue to goes up, but since they are slowing, it's a matter of time to reverse and become negative. Then the population will start declining.
I'd advocate a worldwide one-child policy, or better still sterilizing at least half of us based on various quality tests. (IQ, conscientiousness, etc etc)
This would reverse the 'dysgenic' effect of the elites breeding 'Sheeple' (various cultures acheive it in different ways, going on for 1000's of years) ... and would result in greater individual freedom in future.
There needs be an audit on what is a sustainable world population. The world can only support so many people and past that point it just turns to crap.
I reckon that the world is going to beset with a catastrophe and then who knows, more authoritarian government, that will make sure that we don't breed ourselves into oblivion.
Teh more peopel i listen ot on here, the more i realise that population control is a good thing.
Everyone shoudl be goiven a basc intelligence test, and if they fail, they shoudl be sent ot the moon in a rocket.
If they learn how to land it, on the way, they can have the moon. (naturally, they will have to pay rent, and dig fo rthings on the moon, liek they do in africa).
OR, we could send the rulers up there, if anyones go thte guts ?
do you know how many billions of tonnes of non essential foodstuffs that are chucked in the garbage each year? out of date potato chips, crisps, mayo, meat gone off, sweets, speciality food, etc. how many tonnes of the food calories and proteins in any given supermarket is thrown away? just reducing the meat intake by 10 %, growing vegetables instead of cow feed would increase food protein production 100 fold. 99% is lost between vegetables and the cow. and... BILLIONS of TONNES of PET FOOD.
50€ bet WW3 has started already by 2041. Overpopulation wont be a problem after that.
MAWK93 1 year ago
Wait i dont get how we all die.... Are we leaving the planet? hence the name "World Population." If not i dont see the human population dieing so slowly.
That one person who lived 7 years was funny.
Limelight060 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
..and as soon as they saw me, they came boooooounding over.
electricchandelier 1 year ago
It is not going to be, everyone doesn't decrease food consumption and suddenly they have to starve.
It will more probably be, people gradually are forced to slowly decrease consumption and some may die, but slowly. Eventually the deaths will be enough to steady the population, and everything goes on as normal.
People like you guys that commented here WILL realize the situation, and so will the governments. But it won't be all panicky, of course not. No one wants that.
AuburnAttack21 1 year ago
This is kind of a nonsensical representation.
The theory of The "J" curve states that population will grow to a precipitous point & then collapse in a VERY short time. As a family [child of the 60s] we have had one child, own one car, no powered toys, bicycle mostly and stay as "minimal" as possible. Population is the one problem NOT being discussed by the powers that be. We're in trouble and those in gov't know it. This is what "WE'VE" been screaming about since the 60s.
AuralRobert 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Blond extinction: 200 years away
White people extinction: 300 years away
The earth will become a ball of shit rotating about a bigger ball of gas. The remaining inhabitants (who have never invented anything of any kind of redeeming value) won't have the intelligence to build space craft to escape the explosion of the sun.
comedytracker 2 years ago
and you are one
tecnomusic5616 2 years ago
humans are a disease, a cancer of this planet, a plague
walter0bz 2 years ago
hello Agent Smith!
ziggyvs 2 years ago
@ziggyvs - i'll take that as a complement :)
walter0bz 2 years ago
Why don't you just kill yourself first??
meka4996 2 years ago
@walter0bz
Your face is a plague of humanity, its cancer
MAWK93 1 year ago
hahah!
Poorestgump 2 years ago
this is very inaccurate... most experts think that the population will probly slow down alot by 2050 at 8-9 billion, then gradually climb 1 billion by 2100
cpisretartedmuch 2 years ago
i dont think people are dieing off...
i think people are leaving the earth to conquer space!
cpisretartedmuch 2 years ago
No where to go but up ye!
Poorestgump 2 years ago
Does that mean there will be no people in 2700 AD?
Apple6128 2 years ago
Comment removed
AimalCool 2 years ago
If we do not start to control population, the decrease will NOT be gradual. It will be a sudden die off of billions of ppl in a few years.
The current infrastructure that brings us food & energy are at near-maximum capacity, and are being run so as to maximize short-term production and not long-term survival. Soon, these systems will break down, & famine and war will cover 1/2 of the world.
PhilosopherEight 2 years ago 6
The numbers decrease after a while because the growth rates are SLOWING, right now. First, while the rates are still positive, the population continue to goes up, but since they are slowing, it's a matter of time to reverse and become negative. Then the population will start declining.
grifonegro 2 years ago
in some places the rates will decrease because of malthean factors
bigcat6660013 2 years ago
I'd advocate a worldwide one-child policy, or better still sterilizing at least half of us based on various quality tests. (IQ, conscientiousness, etc etc)
This would reverse the 'dysgenic' effect of the elites breeding 'Sheeple' (various cultures acheive it in different ways, going on for 1000's of years) ... and would result in greater individual freedom in future.
walter0bz 2 years ago
to walter)bz
There needs be an audit on what is a sustainable world population. The world can only support so many people and past that point it just turns to crap.
I reckon that the world is going to beset with a catastrophe and then who knows, more authoritarian government, that will make sure that we don't breed ourselves into oblivion.
axeholme2 2 years ago 2
natures' warning - swine-flu.
coming at the same time as global financial meltdown? too much of a coincidence.
IMO it seems two competing "super-consciousnesses" - (i)the 'Market', and (ii)'Gaia', both agree... that there are too many of us
walter0bz 2 years ago
Teh more peopel i listen ot on here, the more i realise that population control is a good thing.
Everyone shoudl be goiven a basc intelligence test, and if they fail, they shoudl be sent ot the moon in a rocket.
If they learn how to land it, on the way, they can have the moon. (naturally, they will have to pay rent, and dig fo rthings on the moon, liek they do in africa).
OR, we could send the rulers up there, if anyones go thte guts ?
We coudl "cast tehm down, to ruel the moon" !!
mikeybrumbrum 2 years ago 2
im pretty sure it has to do with climate change and things
mcrMANIAc7 3 years ago
do you know how many billions of tonnes of non essential foodstuffs that are chucked in the garbage each year? out of date potato chips, crisps, mayo, meat gone off, sweets, speciality food, etc. how many tonnes of the food calories and proteins in any given supermarket is thrown away? just reducing the meat intake by 10 %, growing vegetables instead of cow feed would increase food protein production 100 fold. 99% is lost between vegetables and the cow. and... BILLIONS of TONNES of PET FOOD.
gunthaarz 3 years ago
Perhaps we are being replaced by a superior species....or robots....
Bismuth88 3 years ago
Comment removed
AimalCool 2 years ago
This needs some new information. Why does the population decline after about 60 years in the future? This is totally not accurate.
jose65536 3 years ago 2
why the ppl are decreasing ??
you are stupid .
MonsteriuM 3 years ago