ummmm 4 speed????? but any who love the car. don't you just miss that key in the dash. I just picked up a 64 olds 98 and I am going nuts over the car. Classy cars God I miss them. (kid of the 80's but still saw many of these on the road)
Beautiful Machine! This was my first vehicle I owned my Senior year in 1977. Mine came out of Georgia with only 42000 miles on it, but mine was a 4 speed manual trans car. Would love to own one again! Sweet Ride! Thanks for the memories... Mudman1959
What a shame the Oldsmobile brand was terminated by GM
Even in its last years Oldsmobile was one of the few innovative divisions of GM producing its own products - wheras the other divisions of General Motors simply rebadged
Then again - perhaps that is the reason they were terminated
442 originally meant 4 barrel carb, 4-speed, (2) dual exhaust. The literature changed in 1965 and they stated 442 stood for: 400 c.i. emgine, 4 barrel carb, dual exhaust.
I owned a 67 442 my last year in HS and first year in college. I graduated in 1971.
Mine was close in color to this car, it was a true 442 with a 4 speed manual trans no A/C. It had :411 gears and would pass anyting but a gas station and a garage.
@srercrcr I have to agree with you only that the rims resemble the buick rim but I owned a 71' olds with these rims, they are oldsmobile rims. Look at 2:15 and you will see the Olds emblem. I've noticed there are a few rims that all resemble this style. I've seen mustang mach I's, mercurys, chryslers that have a similar style rim.
I'm not being a dick towards you, just hate to see people not knowing the truth and if you feel that I am just trying to insult you, not true.
american 60s and 70s cars vs european ones = to the tommy gun vs a sniper riftle ... tommy loud , big, easy to use , fun vs sniper less amo ,more complicated , more acurate, and safer ... it goes down to every drivers style I love them both
ok look, im tired of trying to watch car videos and people getting a case of ass. Here's the facts, European and Asian cars got grand prix and course racing down. Drag racing and circle track, yes American car makers got that down. Both are good both have better areas, now shut up and watch the video!!!!
My mom had it in this exact same car. Back in the 70's she sold herself to the junk man for $35. The Junk man came over the house on the bus with a brand new boner, dropped it in, and drove back and forth!
My mom had this exact same car. Back in the 70's she sold it to the junk man for $35. The Junk man came over the house on the bus with a brand new battery, dropped it in, and drove off in it!
and yes , i agree that you should slam the shit out of a door.
and it is a beautiful restoration, above the rest.....WTF with the cutlass emblem.
unless its the original trunk lid and the dealer had a dealership emblem drilled into it. i hated when dealerships would drill into a new car panel. that took a lot of balls, ever for back then .
I had one just like this my senior year (with a black vynal top and no air) It was geared so low (4:33) that you could just let the clutch out in 4th gear and it would go.
"It got 8 miles to the gallon." (1970 price .39 per gallon) In high school I made $1.60
an hr. part time. (That's $35 a week after taxes) I lived like a king! Had the world by thethe ass!
@mtrboater1: Nice, although, IMO, had I bought a Cutlass new in '67, I probably would've bought much taller gears. A tiny bit slower off the line, but to be feared on the highway.
To whom it may concearn,SHEDHEAD,Olds did not put the 455 in the 442 until 1969.the 400 cu in engine in the 442's were acually under bored 425 wildcats,with a much more wild cam in them
Until 1970. GM did not allow larger than 400 ci in the A body platform until 1970. This was across the board, Chevelle, Cutlass, Skylark, LeMans. If you got an "as made" from the division, it had 400ci or less.
There were cars that got >400ci, but not direct from GM. Hurst/Olds ... Yenko's, COPO's etc ... those had the larger engines.
Amazing car, but sounds like the gearbox shifts a little bit too slow, even for a 67'? Listen at 7:48 - I'm not an expert at all.. just wondering? Thanks for great overviews of stunning cars!
The transmission shift is adjustable as is everything on this car. Just take a flat head screw driver and turn the vacuum modulator on the side of the transmission, either in a bit or out a bit depending on what RPM you'd like it to shift at. It's that simple! No computer chips. No plastic! This 442 is truly spectacular. Not too many left in the world which makes it more rare than an expensive Ferrari or Vette! Once they're gone then they're gone.
@shmedhead I think you better go back to the books and do some studing. I had an original 68 442 and it did not have the 455 in it. It also had the 400.
You are partly correct. The 442s did come with 455, but not in 1967. In 1967 the 442 came with a 400ci Big Block, not the 455. I had an all original 1967 442.
But as far as the 4 barrel carb and dual exhaust, you are spot on.
@shmedhead no - 4bbl carb, 4 speed trans, dual exhaust. thats what the first 442 was... well actually it was the police package that they then sold to the public under the 442 name plate.
I really liked your reviews and I really think you guys are the best on youtube! Do you have a Toyota Land Cruiser avaliable to do a review?? I know is not a best-seller or the best car in the world, but is definitely a world class 4x4, very comfortable and very very tough.
I'm noticing a little patern here. Every time I watch a Chicago cars direct review an American car a European car fan always comes in to complain about Horsepower Per Liter. When I click on a Chicago Cars Direct European Car review I dont see the domestic fans bagging on the European cars. I thought the Euro Car fans would have a bit more class =/
Well if you mean class, I mean, European cars have class, look at Mercedes, Maybach, Rolls Royce, Bently. They a lot have performance. The Bugatti, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Mclaren, a lot of those. Like you saw on this Oldsmobile, It only had 350 horsepower and only a 3 speed automatic. And it was a 6.6 engine. The Europeans would have fit a lot more horspower in an engine like that.
By class I didnt mean the cars. I like all cars and European cars are nice. By class I meant the european car fans who seem to come in every american car video to bash on the interior or hp per liter. I thought the fans of European cars would have more class then that.
The "old" cars were extremely powerful for their time and had what many Americans wanted back in the 60's and early 70's: no frills and monstrous engines that produced enough horsepower to roast the tires and burn down the quarter mile at incredible speeds with only a few modifications. This 4-4-2 was built to be a drag racer, not a luxury touring car.
@MercedesF700 , our american cars in that year were probably 4 of yours, there's nothing like an american v-8, their just beautiful and wonderful to still have, and germany, what you guys have, the best engineared, i had the big 140 chassis s420, 96 boat, but it had to go, no hard fealings,peace!
Really? I'll have you know that in the year 1937 a Mercedes W125 produced more than 500 horses... In 1937! American cars might have big muscle and big motors, but nothing flies like a European car.
@marktech101 that is a foolish comment. The 670hp murcielago SV's engine was designed 40 or so years after this car's engine. I surely don't need to explain that technology has changed? Also the Lamborghini is a V12. Both amazing cars, but cannot compare them.
@marktech101 so a lamborgini has more power than an oldmobile....you are putting a race car built for the wealthy against a car that was built for upper middle class americans/ canadians
@Samsgarden 3.0L V12 Ferrari engine made 300hp, if you haven't managed to find that out in recent 3 months :) So, if we make a very-very rough equation, they would have churned out 600hp out of a 6 liter one. Pluss, European high performance cars (okay, you can't compare European exotics and American 60's - 70's peoples cars, which muscle cars back then were, but anyway) were sporting disc brakes A-arm suspentions and so on and so forth. But you can't compare rare Ferraris to these cars really.
@MercedesF700 it wasnt about the "top end" power - it was the low to mid range torque. HP is calculated by this formula: Horsepower = (Torque X RPM) / 5252
You can have an oldmobile with 350 to 550 lb/ft of torque that only revs to 4,000 rpm thus the peak HP is less than a european motor that makes power up to 6,000 or 7,000 RPM
@MercedesF700 cmon man if you want to talk about power we can talk about corvette, a fraction of the cost and beating most of the very expensive european cars........this was a muscle car of the 60s and what european car had that kind of power in 1960s???
Corvettes may have a lot of power, but they use cheap materials(plastic) they have no good handling whatsoever, and you couldn't even drive as an everyday car. Then you look over to European manufacturers. You want a sports car with muscle, take an M3. You want a sports car with a small engine, take a 911 turbo. You want a luxurious, well made car, take a Mercedes E350. Now American manufacturers just can't make cars like Europeans. Not to mention, Mercedes-Benz did make the car.
@MercedesF700 corvettes are used as every day drivers where im from lol and you never answered, what european car in the 60s had more than 350 hp?????
@joe1hollis2 Ferrari's and Lamborghini's Made cars more powerful than that in the early 60's. Granted they are far more exclusive and expensive.. But the thing is. Eu cars are made more efficiently. That means a 170hp Mercedes SL back then will hit 60mph in just 7 sec not far from the 6.somethings that the 300+hp Ami cars at the time. Forget about comparing them powerwise, coz its a waste. Just love the cars
@MercedesF700 I noticed you only mentioned high end european cars.There's your mistake as this was a car offered the the common man in American, something unheard of in europe.
@MercedesF700 wat would an affordable, everyday car that is european that anything CLOSE to 350 hp. i dont think there is any cause europe is about small engine fuel economy. like they r now, i have nothing against euro cars i like most of em but ur comment just states that u dont quite understand that oldsmobile isnt making cars worth over 300grand. this car was probably maybe 2 grand in 67' correct me if im wrong.
When I watched the Chevelle SS video I loved it and thought "Well this is a treat, they'll probably never do another muscle car video" and then I watched this. Absolutely fantastic. What a gorgeous automobile with a tremendous exhaust note. Thanks so much for posting this.
ummmm 4 speed????? but any who love the car. don't you just miss that key in the dash. I just picked up a 64 olds 98 and I am going nuts over the car. Classy cars God I miss them. (kid of the 80's but still saw many of these on the road)
bluesbrothermike 1 month ago
7:51 right mirror ?
eminembadreminem 1 month ago
Always thought the 442 was a manual transmission. 4 Speed 4barrel Duel exhaust...? NO?
fish02100 1 month ago
Beautiful Machine! This was my first vehicle I owned my Senior year in 1977. Mine came out of Georgia with only 42000 miles on it, but mine was a 4 speed manual trans car. Would love to own one again! Sweet Ride! Thanks for the memories... Mudman1959
mudman1959 2 months ago
What a shame the Oldsmobile brand was terminated by GM
Even in its last years Oldsmobile was one of the few innovative divisions of GM producing its own products - wheras the other divisions of General Motors simply rebadged
Then again - perhaps that is the reason they were terminated
supergavo123123 2 months ago
LOVE THE V8 !!
nopehopenopehope 4 months ago
...jaw dropping!
NMWMN 4 months ago
7:24 i bet his wife was like that LOL
ThaTKidDreW93 5 months ago
Are you sure this a 442 ? looks as if, may be a "Clone " to me !
B4BoomersBlockBoy7 5 months ago
Are you sure this a 442 ? looks as if may be a "Clone " to me !
B4BoomersBlockBoy7 5 months ago
442 originally meant 4 barrel carb, 4-speed, (2) dual exhaust. The literature changed in 1965 and they stated 442 stood for: 400 c.i. emgine, 4 barrel carb, dual exhaust.
gfbarchitect 6 months ago
442= 4 barrels 4 seats 2 doors
DJ4000VOLT 6 months ago
almost a museum car!
beerdeddi1 7 months ago
and the guy even bends the papers of the car like they had no value at all, depressing.
EduWestCoastRap 7 months ago
this car wouldnt last long in that conditions with an owner like this guy... always touching everything and threating it gross.
EduWestCoastRap 7 months ago
Is it just me or does anyone else hear a knock in that engine @ 8:57-9:00 ??
popson45 7 months ago
has anyone looked at the tags?
claytonstl4 8 months ago
SOMEBODY KNOW THIS CAR WHAT TIME DO? 0 TO 60 ?
luisarturomarin 8 months ago
Amazing car.
casper123 8 months ago
Hope the new owner becomes a member of the Antique Auto Club of America (AACA)
RayGettings 8 months ago
I owned a 67 442 my last year in HS and first year in college. I graduated in 1971.
Mine was close in color to this car, it was a true 442 with a 4 speed manual trans no A/C. It had :411 gears and would pass anyting but a gas station and a garage.
The seats were vinal not leather.
westexpipeliner1 9 months ago
Where can you get a 442 upgraded from a 350 stock? Any price range as well?
AceDriveProgramming 9 months ago
Does anyone know what the price of this would be? like fully restored?
FloridaBoyNick 9 months ago
If that car had a vagina, I'd fuck it.
philip21786 9 months ago
@philip21786 I'd fuck it anyway.
markos6363 8 months ago
could be leather could be vinyl. I don't know. HAHAHA
MrGenebets 9 months ago
Wow the guy in the video really is a MORAN. 1:51 he probably took a good chunk out of the paint with his wedding ring.
Tastycarrots 10 months ago 2
@Tastycarrots It's MORON stupid takes one to know one ha ha
02vector 4 months ago
@Tastycarrots It's MORON stupid takes one to know one ha ha
02vector 4 months ago
The wheels certainly aren't numbers-matching....they're from Buick.
srercrcr 10 months ago
@srercrcr I have to agree with you only that the rims resemble the buick rim but I owned a 71' olds with these rims, they are oldsmobile rims. Look at 2:15 and you will see the Olds emblem. I've noticed there are a few rims that all resemble this style. I've seen mustang mach I's, mercurys, chryslers that have a similar style rim.
I'm not being a dick towards you, just hate to see people not knowing the truth and if you feel that I am just trying to insult you, not true.
365degrees 9 months ago
SOLD! :-(
Miker3797 11 months ago
american 60s and 70s cars vs european ones = to the tommy gun vs a sniper riftle ... tommy loud , big, easy to use , fun vs sniper less amo ,more complicated , more acurate, and safer ... it goes down to every drivers style I love them both
TheSamaell 11 months ago
I have a 67 cutlass 4 door no post with a 394 big block! it blows people away when they realize its a 4 door! Best car ever made!
The67cutlass 1 year ago
not a matching442. 442 means 4 speed manual tranny 4 barrel carb dual exhaust.
johnbacktun 1 year ago
@johnbacktun not always! this is a 400, 4 barrel, dual exhaust. 4 4 2
wngnutmv 1 year ago
Thank you! You said Four Four Two and not Four-Forty Two. I hate it when people say the latter.
RoundenBrown 1 year ago
24 hr's going over it,,, then how could miss the Cutlass badge on deck lid!!!!!!! just wondering!!
pepp5150 1 year ago
Cutlass and 442 on deck lid WTF!!!!!
pepp5150 1 year ago
@ 0:37 Just Badass!
MrRagman93 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrRagman93 1 year ago
ok look, im tired of trying to watch car videos and people getting a case of ass. Here's the facts, European and Asian cars got grand prix and course racing down. Drag racing and circle track, yes American car makers got that down. Both are good both have better areas, now shut up and watch the video!!!!
cbcrog 1 year ago
Nice car BUT, the Cutlass badge should not be there-it's missing the 442 stripe(all 67 442's had 'em).He scrutinized the car for 24 hrs? haha
chipsperry 1 year ago
Nice car BUT, the Cutlass badge should not be there-it's missing the 442 stripe(all 67 442's had 'em).He scrutinized the car for 24 hrs? haha
chipsperry 1 year ago
I don't think those wheels are original...
McVaio 1 year ago
i hate how this guy says it's in better than new condition
scarb0r0 1 year ago
NICE car!
but i dont understand what some little balls moron is complaining about american an european cars just to feel better...
MrMcDschingis 1 year ago
talkin american muscle here not some guy named BIFF bmw
tmklunk 1 year ago
If this guy knew what the fuck he was actually talking about, he'd know the the seats were vinyl, NOT leather!
mypalrocco 1 year ago
One of my all time favorites! So much so that I paid some decent money for an extremely detailed 1/18 scale version made by Highway 61...cool stuff!
mypalrocco 1 year ago
My '67 Cutlass 442 has the factory floor shift......why would someone order a 442 with COLUMN shift???
CJurasin 1 year ago
@CJurasin
Better blowjobs while driving!
mypalrocco 1 year ago
do you watch fast lane daily? cuz you have their intro music or do they have your intro music????
dominicancheif117 1 year ago
Cutlass should not be on the left of the trunk lid. Don't try to fool people. Stick with your new stuff and leave the classics alone.
daltonmaddy 1 year ago
no seat belt?
nelsonafonso1 1 year ago
chicagodirect>jayleno's garage WOOT!
Lebanesefinest 1 year ago
I just got a 67' with a factory installed W-30. All the numbers match. My friends call me a spoiled 17 year old. Awesome car though.
jewald4 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My mom had it in this exact same car. Back in the 70's she sold herself to the junk man for $35. The Junk man came over the house on the bus with a brand new boner, dropped it in, and drove back and forth!
thetrolone 1 year ago
My mom had this exact same car. Back in the 70's she sold it to the junk man for $35. The Junk man came over the house on the bus with a brand new battery, dropped it in, and drove off in it!
starguard 1 year ago
year one is a good place for gm parts..
but over here on the west coast in seal beach calfornia
theres another place called original parts group
where they everything and any thing for your gm muscle car..
subscribe to my channel.. updates will come soon..
gmo8492 1 year ago
why does the serial number have the wrong rivets?
and yes , i agree that you should slam the shit out of a door.
and it is a beautiful restoration, above the rest.....WTF with the cutlass emblem.
unless its the original trunk lid and the dealer had a dealership emblem drilled into it. i hated when dealerships would drill into a new car panel. that took a lot of balls, ever for back then .
alienaxe 1 year ago
I had one just like this my senior year (with a black vynal top and no air) It was geared so low (4:33) that you could just let the clutch out in 4th gear and it would go.
"It got 8 miles to the gallon." (1970 price .39 per gallon) In high school I made $1.60
an hr. part time. (That's $35 a week after taxes) I lived like a king! Had the world by thethe ass!
mtrboater1 1 year ago
@mtrboater1: Nice, although, IMO, had I bought a Cutlass new in '67, I probably would've bought much taller gears. A tiny bit slower off the line, but to be feared on the highway.
MiracleMile90 1 year ago
Oh my god I love that car! My Cutlass Spreme 1989 is nowhere near as badass as that 442
xwarxsabrewulf 1 year ago
back in the day my dad bought one for my grandpa then my uncle ruined it
1MPALASS 1 year ago
lol every door will close if slammed this way...omg...
hoschist 1 year ago
while the other guys are argueing about the "Car" I'm just "Dreaming" of a Day I can own the Best "MUSCLE CAR 442" that ever existed !
robbypjr 1 year ago
Why didn't the original radio work?
blues03 1 year ago
@blues03 it was there just for looks. it had digital audio in the glovebox.
tamapalagi 1 year ago
@tamapalagi Right, thanks for the reply.
blues03 1 year ago
cool......now how much ?
robbypjr 1 year ago
wtf?? cutlass rear deck lid (trunk)
pepp5150 1 year ago
@pepp5150 it's correct...the 442 was not an own model in 1967...it was an option on the cutlass supreme
hoschist 1 year ago
@pepp5150 ah now I now what you meant...wth is that cutlass badge doing there?
hoschist 1 year ago
To whom it may concearn,SHEDHEAD,Olds did not put the 455 in the 442 until 1969.the 400 cu in engine in the 442's were acually under bored 425 wildcats,with a much more wild cam in them
birdhunter317 2 years ago
Until 1970. GM did not allow larger than 400 ci in the A body platform until 1970. This was across the board, Chevelle, Cutlass, Skylark, LeMans. If you got an "as made" from the division, it had 400ci or less.
There were cars that got >400ci, but not direct from GM. Hurst/Olds ... Yenko's, COPO's etc ... those had the larger engines.
shizmar884 2 years ago
@birdhunter317 no it's an olds engine...no buick.
hoschist 1 year ago
Comment removed
donwon213 2 years ago
yep, yep you did have an oldsmobile. but an olds cutlass. ( with 442 badges)
close but no cigar : )
shmedhead 2 years ago
why don't american car companies don't make interiors like that anymore? Especially for the Camaro/Mustang/Challenger
mrjost55 2 years ago
Amazing car, but sounds like the gearbox shifts a little bit too slow, even for a 67'? Listen at 7:48 - I'm not an expert at all.. just wondering? Thanks for great overviews of stunning cars!
Granada28 2 years ago
The transmission shift is adjustable as is everything on this car. Just take a flat head screw driver and turn the vacuum modulator on the side of the transmission, either in a bit or out a bit depending on what RPM you'd like it to shift at. It's that simple! No computer chips. No plastic! This 442 is truly spectacular. Not too many left in the world which makes it more rare than an expensive Ferrari or Vette! Once they're gone then they're gone.
SkylarkGSX 2 years ago
Automatic transmissions should shift nearly instantly.
Tboninator 2 years ago
sorry with 4 speed trans
shmedhead 2 years ago
Not a true 442 olds
442 means
455 ci
4 barrel carb
true dual exhaust
shmedhead 2 years ago
@shmedhead I think you better go back to the books and do some studing. I had an original 68 442 and it did not have the 455 in it. It also had the 400.
bapsternow 2 years ago
You are partly correct. The 442s did come with 455, but not in 1967. In 1967 the 442 came with a 400ci Big Block, not the 455. I had an all original 1967 442.
But as far as the 4 barrel carb and dual exhaust, you are spot on.
donwon213 2 years ago
@shmedhead no - 4bbl carb, 4 speed trans, dual exhaust. thats what the first 442 was... well actually it was the police package that they then sold to the public under the 442 name plate.
mustang633NY 1 year ago
Amazing!!
i love american cars from that era
why is the radio inoperable? u didnt say lol
ZorbinEUR 2 years ago
no doubt in my mind it has a Flowmaster exhaust. Awesome 442
4wheeler14 2 years ago
Looks brand new !
Rockstargamesfan1 2 years ago
chicagocarsdirect:
I really liked your reviews and I really think you guys are the best on youtube! Do you have a Toyota Land Cruiser avaliable to do a review?? I know is not a best-seller or the best car in the world, but is definitely a world class 4x4, very comfortable and very very tough.
Thanks a lot
lovecars890 2 years ago
amazing amazing car
305pride 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is only a three speed transmission? Thats a little dissapointing. And I think that that is a small amount of horsepower for a 6.6 liter engine.
MercedesF700 2 years ago
I'm noticing a little patern here. Every time I watch a Chicago cars direct review an American car a European car fan always comes in to complain about Horsepower Per Liter. When I click on a Chicago Cars Direct European Car review I dont see the domestic fans bagging on the European cars. I thought the Euro Car fans would have a bit more class =/
JohnFromSpace 2 years ago
Well if you mean class, I mean, European cars have class, look at Mercedes, Maybach, Rolls Royce, Bently. They a lot have performance. The Bugatti, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Mclaren, a lot of those. Like you saw on this Oldsmobile, It only had 350 horsepower and only a 3 speed automatic. And it was a 6.6 engine. The Europeans would have fit a lot more horspower in an engine like that.
MercedesF700 2 years ago 6
By class I didnt mean the cars. I like all cars and European cars are nice. By class I meant the european car fans who seem to come in every american car video to bash on the interior or hp per liter. I thought the fans of European cars would have more class then that.
JohnFromSpace 2 years ago
Oh. Well I think that they think that the old cars are a little weak and not very nice.
MercedesF700 2 years ago
The "old" cars were extremely powerful for their time and had what many Americans wanted back in the 60's and early 70's: no frills and monstrous engines that produced enough horsepower to roast the tires and burn down the quarter mile at incredible speeds with only a few modifications. This 4-4-2 was built to be a drag racer, not a luxury touring car.
Tripp426 2 years ago
@MercedesF700 , our american cars in that year were probably 4 of yours, there's nothing like an american v-8, their just beautiful and wonderful to still have, and germany, what you guys have, the best engineared, i had the big 140 chassis s420, 96 boat, but it had to go, no hard fealings,peace!
markmarshall39 1 year ago
@markmarshall39
Really? I'll have you know that in the year 1937 a Mercedes W125 produced more than 500 horses... In 1937! American cars might have big muscle and big motors, but nothing flies like a European car.
MercedesF700 1 year ago
@MercedesF700 and exspensive maintenance!!
markmarshall39 1 year ago
@markmarshall39 change your name it shouldn't be Mercedes fucking disgrace
HOTBOYRULE 1 year ago
@HOTBOYRULE , change my name?
markmarshall39 1 year ago
nowhere near the torque though
assgod1 2 years ago
Yeah, lol. The Lamborghini Murcielago SV's engine is a 6.5 and it gets 670 horsepower. Almost double, and it's naturally aspirated as well.
marktech101 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Amazing, isn't it?
MercedesF700 2 years ago
@marktech101 whats your point? it was 1967. single carb,hydraulic cam.
tamapalagi 1 year ago
@marktech101 that is a foolish comment. The 670hp murcielago SV's engine was designed 40 or so years after this car's engine. I surely don't need to explain that technology has changed? Also the Lamborghini is a V12. Both amazing cars, but cannot compare them.
matteovrizzi 1 year ago
@marktech101 so a lamborgini has more power than an oldmobile....you are putting a race car built for the wealthy against a car that was built for upper middle class americans/ canadians
mustang633NY 1 year ago
@MercedesF700
So how much power were said European cars making in '67?
Samsgarden 1 year ago 21
@Samsgarden 3.0L V12 Ferrari engine made 300hp, if you haven't managed to find that out in recent 3 months :) So, if we make a very-very rough equation, they would have churned out 600hp out of a 6 liter one. Pluss, European high performance cars (okay, you can't compare European exotics and American 60's - 70's peoples cars, which muscle cars back then were, but anyway) were sporting disc brakes A-arm suspentions and so on and so forth. But you can't compare rare Ferraris to these cars really.
jones9999 1 year ago
@Samsgarden
power vs fuel cons.
This is an animal (great car).
TheCeki1982 1 year ago
@Samsgarden i think about 7
triathlon4ever 1 year ago
@Samsgarden
Only Mercedes was making more power with same comparable displacement.
300SEL 6.3 V8 OHC independent fuel injection, 300 bhp, 4-spd automatic
Same year '67, 6.8 liter engine making 400+ bhp fitted with electric injection and dry sump.
2jzgtejza80 4 months ago
@MercedesF700 it wasnt about the "top end" power - it was the low to mid range torque. HP is calculated by this formula: Horsepower = (Torque X RPM) / 5252
You can have an oldmobile with 350 to 550 lb/ft of torque that only revs to 4,000 rpm thus the peak HP is less than a european motor that makes power up to 6,000 or 7,000 RPM
mustang633NY 1 year ago
@MercedesF700 cmon man if you want to talk about power we can talk about corvette, a fraction of the cost and beating most of the very expensive european cars........this was a muscle car of the 60s and what european car had that kind of power in 1960s???
joe1hollis2 1 year ago
@joe1hollis2
Corvettes may have a lot of power, but they use cheap materials(plastic) they have no good handling whatsoever, and you couldn't even drive as an everyday car. Then you look over to European manufacturers. You want a sports car with muscle, take an M3. You want a sports car with a small engine, take a 911 turbo. You want a luxurious, well made car, take a Mercedes E350. Now American manufacturers just can't make cars like Europeans. Not to mention, Mercedes-Benz did make the car.
MercedesF700 1 year ago
@MercedesF700 corvettes are used as every day drivers where im from lol and you never answered, what european car in the 60s had more than 350 hp?????
joe1hollis2 1 year ago
@joe1hollis2 Ferrari's and Lamborghini's Made cars more powerful than that in the early 60's. Granted they are far more exclusive and expensive.. But the thing is. Eu cars are made more efficiently. That means a 170hp Mercedes SL back then will hit 60mph in just 7 sec not far from the 6.somethings that the 300+hp Ami cars at the time. Forget about comparing them powerwise, coz its a waste. Just love the cars
Detoyato 1 year ago
@MercedesF700 except jaguar with their ridiculous v12 engines. their milage was even worse then these awesome V8's !
Basjuhdeuil 1 year ago
@MercedesF700 but there is no replacement for DIsplacement!! haha
triathlon4ever 1 year ago
@MercedesF700 I noticed you only mentioned high end european cars.There's your mistake as this was a car offered the the common man in American, something unheard of in europe.
Indogyearsimdead 11 months ago
@MercedesF700 "The Europeans would have fit a lot more horspower in an engine like that" ... but they hadn't
spektor65 11 months ago
@spektor65 because they reached 350hp with smaller engines ;) reached the same speed even without 350 hp
TheSamaell 11 months ago
@MercedesF700 wat would an affordable, everyday car that is european that anything CLOSE to 350 hp. i dont think there is any cause europe is about small engine fuel economy. like they r now, i have nothing against euro cars i like most of em but ur comment just states that u dont quite understand that oldsmobile isnt making cars worth over 300grand. this car was probably maybe 2 grand in 67' correct me if im wrong.
thehondarider250 11 months ago
@MercedesF700 so yes europeans have cars with more Hp now but what about back in '67?? what did they have then?
MrCujo956 10 months ago
@MrCujo956
Well, lets see. A 1966 Bizzarinni GT Strada had 365 horsepower from its V8, which is more.
MercedesF700 10 months ago
@MercedesF700
a hemi car in 67 produce more than 664 nm torque...but what about an europian
iranclassiccar 9 months ago
U.N.B.E.L.I.E.V.A.B.L.E.
Itchhhh 2 years ago
WOW!
jo05dk 2 years ago
how much?
VivaLaBamEpisodes 2 years ago
Nothing quite like being behind the wheel of a vehicle that gently rocks when you blip the throttle. Superb.
opmike343 2 years ago
the sound those doors made when he slammed them....wow
1bentley4ever 2 years ago
When I watched the Chevelle SS video I loved it and thought "Well this is a treat, they'll probably never do another muscle car video" and then I watched this. Absolutely fantastic. What a gorgeous automobile with a tremendous exhaust note. Thanks so much for posting this.
Tripp426 2 years ago
American muscle !
jason854656 2 years ago
beautiful...
apricotsnms516 2 years ago
Demolition Man
JohnFromSpace 2 years ago
1st VIEWER
gib88son 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
number 1 viewer!
Stereophile11 2 years ago