Added: 4 years ago
From: 82abhilash
Views: 2,667
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ok the chess example just went ooooon and ooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnn

  • This 'halo' of causation which hovers over possible worlds keeps the actual cause hidden. If Austin was right (I agree that he wasn't), then we would have to assume only one possible world, i.e. a world with no agents. Then we would have no need to contemplate many worlds because we would not be here to contemplate them. Hence, Austin would not, 'could' not, have sunk the putt because he wouldn't be there to sink it. Or, if he was simply not good enough to sink it, then he would be the putz.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more