Yep, and the solution is Ron Paul in 2012. Unfortunately, not enough people will vote for him because he'll take away all their goodies we get from the government. We elect another Republican spender in the next election and the United States will collapse. Albert Einstein said the definition of insanity was doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Something to ponder upon in the next election when you keep voting for the Same old Republicans and Democrats.
If people are worried about the fiscal situation that our country is in then why are they throwing bitch fits about scientific studies? Science can help progress our efficiency for fiscal responsibility more than any other of the programs our government throws money into.If we want to cut down our debt, a better place to start slashing spending than scientific funding would be the funding of our global military empire. 800+ overseas military bases are not cheap to staff, maintain and facilitate.
If you want to see some real government waste and abuse, go to dirtyspendingsecrets dot add the usual ending. Example: The National Institutes of Health (a government funded organization) recently paid $900K for a study of the relationship between the size of men's penises to their sexual health among men who have sex with men.There are more at the website.
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom...You put down the TP, then comment, "If you don't like it, work to change the laws... You're a moocher...". I would say that the moochers are the ones who sponge off the taxpayers for their existence (and , even though I am a TPer, I understand there are exceptions). As for "working to change the laws", that's exactly what the TP is in the middle of doing. C'mon, 11-12.
Here's background on the shrimp study, remove all the spaces (this is my URL shortener BTW):
peekURL . com / zVLfdKf
peekURL . com / zFrxbT5
peekURL . com / zLZMZMN
I'm not saying the study is good or bad, just that fiscal cons *don't care* whether a study is good or bad. They aren't willing to do a cost-benefit analysis, they just want to shrink gov't and they're willing to mislead to do it.
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom Is it really relevant how useful the study was? We are spending 200 BILLION dollars more than we make every single month. EVERY SINGLE MONTH. Fiscal cons are trying to save us from a financial collapse that could leave us with mass starvation and war. It has to end, the party is over. Government must be cut WAAAY back. We shouldn't be arguing about 2% cuts over the next 10 years. We need to be talking about 30% cuts over the next 6 months, and that's just getting started.
Yet another misleading video from BA. The shrimp treadmill bit was just a small part of a much larger study about sea health, and the treadmill itself cost about $50. Do a search, and see why you can't trust BA.
As for the trillion, gov't revenues have fallen due to the recession, while the costs incurred by Bush and Obama have to be paid for. If you incorrectly think Obama's spending is solely responsible for the deficit, you're in BA's target market.
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom The government spent $500,000 studying the damn sealife while the rest of the country is trying to figure out how to pay for rent, food, water, and much much more. Tack on another few trillion dollars basically pissing in the wind and that's what our government has been doing for the last decade. Obama is the fucking president. THE PRESIDENT. THE LEADER of the US.
@paco114: a $500,000 sea health study could be a total boondoggle. Or, it could greatly help the fishing industry (2003 GDP: $31,500,000,000).
This video doesn't care about that. Even if the $500,000 study was actually worth $10,000,000 to the fishing industry, they'd still oppose it. That's stupid, but that's how fiscal cons operate.
Fiscal cons also try to mislead, of course. Like pretending the study was just to put shrimp on a treadmill. Don't trust fiscal cons.
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom If the study could have been really helpful, don't you think that some of the big names from the fishing industry would have been studying this by now? Oh wait, of course they wouldn't. Why spend their own money to figure out when they have the government do it on your dime? Fiscal conservatives and their logic, HAH!
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom You're an ass. You've no right spending my money to help somebody else. It's my money, earned by my sweat and hard work.The sad part is that most libs don't understand this simple concept. This is why all liberals are nutjobs.
1. It smears, pretending I'm a "liberal" as that term is understood. TPers are virulent partisans and can't conceive of something not being A or B.
2. It doesn't understand how the U.S. works. We the U.S. have every right to take some of your money and give it to others. If you don't like it, work to change the laws or (much better) move to Somalia. You're a moocher: you want the benefits of living in the U.S. without the costs.
first off, I highly doubt it was worth 10 mill or half that, if you could even measure it. Second, it's not the end amount, but the net worth efficiency and the opportunity costs involved. What would it be worth on a collective if that 500k was kept in the individual taxpayer's pockets? And was 500k really needed for a study like that?
I'd trust a "fiscal con" over some asshole lib any day. In case you didn't notice, spending too little is so far from being a problem as to be an impossibility
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom He is supposed to keep the federal government to the Constitution and the only thing he seems to know how to do is blame everybody but himself. The Congress and other executive agencies have done NOTHING to help us even though they've had PLENTY of time to crank something, anything, out but have waited until just last year to start the political bullshit. BA did exaggerate, but they are nothing compared to the liberal and statist bullshit you apparently love.
Yep, and the solution is Ron Paul in 2012. Unfortunately, not enough people will vote for him because he'll take away all their goodies we get from the government. We elect another Republican spender in the next election and the United States will collapse. Albert Einstein said the definition of insanity was doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Something to ponder upon in the next election when you keep voting for the Same old Republicans and Democrats.
ke4jcd 4 months ago 2
If people are worried about the fiscal situation that our country is in then why are they throwing bitch fits about scientific studies? Science can help progress our efficiency for fiscal responsibility more than any other of the programs our government throws money into.If we want to cut down our debt, a better place to start slashing spending than scientific funding would be the funding of our global military empire. 800+ overseas military bases are not cheap to staff, maintain and facilitate.
drummerforpeace 6 months ago
Sometimes, ya just gotta laugh...
MichaelJRollins 6 months ago
"i wish we could do something about it" ... if only there was a candidate who has been consistent on this issue for over 30 years ... hmmm
drlax15m 6 months ago 4
Why interviewer isn't that hottie from the first video?!
redevel0per 6 months ago
fuck america. nuff said
takadi 6 months ago
If you want to see some real government waste and abuse, go to dirtyspendingsecrets dot add the usual ending. Example: The National Institutes of Health (a government funded organization) recently paid $900K for a study of the relationship between the size of men's penises to their sexual health among men who have sex with men.There are more at the website.
dodger4754 6 months ago
Do I spy a fan of R.A.H., oTANSTAAFLo?
dodger4754 6 months ago
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom...You put down the TP, then comment, "If you don't like it, work to change the laws... You're a moocher...". I would say that the moochers are the ones who sponge off the taxpayers for their existence (and , even though I am a TPer, I understand there are exceptions). As for "working to change the laws", that's exactly what the TP is in the middle of doing. C'mon, 11-12.
dodger4754 6 months ago
wow, 10 months? You can't blame that on Bush...obama!
floridaironclad 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012
TheN2D 6 months ago
Here's background on the shrimp study, remove all the spaces (this is my URL shortener BTW):
peekURL . com / zVLfdKf
peekURL . com / zFrxbT5
peekURL . com / zLZMZMN
I'm not saying the study is good or bad, just that fiscal cons *don't care* whether a study is good or bad. They aren't willing to do a cost-benefit analysis, they just want to shrink gov't and they're willing to mislead to do it.
NoMoreBlatherDotCom 6 months ago
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom Is it really relevant how useful the study was? We are spending 200 BILLION dollars more than we make every single month. EVERY SINGLE MONTH. Fiscal cons are trying to save us from a financial collapse that could leave us with mass starvation and war. It has to end, the party is over. Government must be cut WAAAY back. We shouldn't be arguing about 2% cuts over the next 10 years. We need to be talking about 30% cuts over the next 6 months, and that's just getting started.
DrRockso99 4 months ago
JayW, aka "Canada here I come", you are a mess. Entertaining as always, but a mess.
grulks 6 months ago
yeah it would be nice if we could do somethting about it but until the baby boomers are all dead we cant, unless Ron Paul was president
x1pyroveride 6 months ago
Yet another misleading video from BA. The shrimp treadmill bit was just a small part of a much larger study about sea health, and the treadmill itself cost about $50. Do a search, and see why you can't trust BA.
As for the trillion, gov't revenues have fallen due to the recession, while the costs incurred by Bush and Obama have to be paid for. If you incorrectly think Obama's spending is solely responsible for the deficit, you're in BA's target market.
Don't trust fiscal cons: they lie.
NoMoreBlatherDotCom 6 months ago
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom The government spent $500,000 studying the damn sealife while the rest of the country is trying to figure out how to pay for rent, food, water, and much much more. Tack on another few trillion dollars basically pissing in the wind and that's what our government has been doing for the last decade. Obama is the fucking president. THE PRESIDENT. THE LEADER of the US.
paco114 6 months ago
@paco114: a $500,000 sea health study could be a total boondoggle. Or, it could greatly help the fishing industry (2003 GDP: $31,500,000,000).
This video doesn't care about that. Even if the $500,000 study was actually worth $10,000,000 to the fishing industry, they'd still oppose it. That's stupid, but that's how fiscal cons operate.
Fiscal cons also try to mislead, of course. Like pretending the study was just to put shrimp on a treadmill. Don't trust fiscal cons.
NoMoreBlatherDotCom 6 months ago
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom If the study could have been really helpful, don't you think that some of the big names from the fishing industry would have been studying this by now? Oh wait, of course they wouldn't. Why spend their own money to figure out when they have the government do it on your dime? Fiscal conservatives and their logic, HAH!
paco114 6 months ago 2
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom You're an ass. You've no right spending my money to help somebody else. It's my money, earned by my sweat and hard work.The sad part is that most libs don't understand this simple concept. This is why all liberals are nutjobs.
oTANSTAAFLo 6 months ago 2
@oTANSTAAFLo illustrates teapartier/libertarian "issues":
1. It smears, pretending I'm a "liberal" as that term is understood. TPers are virulent partisans and can't conceive of something not being A or B.
2. It doesn't understand how the U.S. works. We the U.S. have every right to take some of your money and give it to others. If you don't like it, work to change the laws or (much better) move to Somalia. You're a moocher: you want the benefits of living in the U.S. without the costs.
NoMoreBlatherDotCom 6 months ago
Comment removed
takadi 6 months ago
first off, I highly doubt it was worth 10 mill or half that, if you could even measure it. Second, it's not the end amount, but the net worth efficiency and the opportunity costs involved. What would it be worth on a collective if that 500k was kept in the individual taxpayer's pockets? And was 500k really needed for a study like that?
I'd trust a "fiscal con" over some asshole lib any day. In case you didn't notice, spending too little is so far from being a problem as to be an impossibility
takadi 6 months ago
@NoMoreBlatherDotCom He is supposed to keep the federal government to the Constitution and the only thing he seems to know how to do is blame everybody but himself. The Congress and other executive agencies have done NOTHING to help us even though they've had PLENTY of time to crank something, anything, out but have waited until just last year to start the political bullshit. BA did exaggerate, but they are nothing compared to the liberal and statist bullshit you apparently love.
paco114 6 months ago
Forget living in America. I'm learning German and I'm out. Hallo Deutschland.
mrAZcardinal 6 months ago
Canada? lol It's not any better there bub.
Nunchucks67 6 months ago 6
@Nunchucks67
Hahah, that guy is actually a friend of mine. He's a total conservative.
grulks 6 months ago
@grulks If he was a true conservative he would know how socialized that nation is. Its a shit hole for how many people they have.
Nunchucks67 6 months ago
"I wish we could do something about it"
With that kind of statement, we're screwed. The guy doesn't even realize there IS a way to do something about it. 2012 can't come soon enough.
MERCILESSPIT 6 months ago
Good video!
oilhammer04 6 months ago
Excellent video. Scary facts.
ecg1992 6 months ago
-----
END THE POLICE STATE
END THE EMPIRE
END THE FED
RON PAUL = President 2012-2020
-----
Sounds4theInfowar 6 months ago 23
@Sounds4theInfowar Shut the fuck up you stupid little bitch. Are you 12 or what?
KingDingaLing090 6 months ago
@KingDingaLing090 With a name like yours, I'd think YOU'RE the 12 year old. I'm not decided on Ron Paul yet, but the rest of the stuff I agree with.
CaptHandsome42 5 months ago
@CaptHandsome42 Yeah. You are about the 10th Paultard to point that out. "CaptHandsome" <----?
KingDingaLing090 5 months ago