Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • BHAVISHIA PURAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AS A RELIABLE SOURCE BY MANY HINDU AND NON HINDU RELIGIOUS SCHOLARS DUE TO THE AMOUNT OF IT BEING CHANGED OVER AND OVER AGAIN. IF YOU LOOK FOR THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN NOT ONLY HINDUISM AND ISLAM BUT ALL RELIGIONS AND ISLAM WILL YOU SEE THE UNDENIABLE TRUTH OF WORSHIPING ONE TRUE GOD ALONG WITH PERFORMING THE GOOD DEEDS.

  • THE MOTTO OF THE DEVIL IS ONE AND THE SAME TO DIVIDE AND CONQUER US. WE CAN EITHER FIGHT EACH OTHER OR COME TO AN UNDERSTANDING AND TALK ABOUT THE COMMON GOOD BELIEVES THAT WE SHARE. THE REASON WHY HE USED ANOTHER NAME AS TO THE ARABIC ONE IS SIMPLY BECAUSE IT WAS A DIFFERENT LANGUAGE BUT THE MEANING IS THE SAME. IF YOU DO NOT ACCEPT THE BOOK AS BEING FROM A HINDU SOURCE THEN I WOULD RECOMMEND THE UNDENIABLE VEDAS HINDU SCRIPTURE WHICH IS FULL OF ISLAMIC PROPHECIES.

  • Where does this "BARM UTTARA KHAND" BOOK COMES IN?? WHAT IS IT PART OF? REAVEL THE SOURCE. ALSO WHAT NAMES DOES LORD MAHADEV USE FOR AMINA AND ALL OTHER CHARACTERS MENTIONED IN HERE? WHY DOESN'T LORD MAHADEV USE THE ORIGINAL NAMES AS THEY WERE IN ARABIA AND JUST SUPPOSEDLY WHAT IT CAN MEAN? FROM THE SCRIPTURES WE KNOW THAT THIS IS NOT WHAT LORD MAHADEV SAID. THERE IS MENTION OF MAMADA IN BHAVISHYA PURAN - THE DEMON TRIPURASUR WHOM MAHADEV BURNT BUT RETURENED N STARTED ANTI-VEDIC RELIGION.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more