Apocalypse now?: Black Holes at CERN

[doomtrigger]

I LIKE BURNING FLESH

[freeclimbhero]

Lol if there is a black hole we could make time machines and prevent it lul.

[Rahavin1]

Where can I read about this? Im not a phycisist, but I find the topic of black holes, time, and magnetics very interresting. From what I have read, it does not seem likely that CERN will ever create a a black hole, but I need to read more before I can make an opinion, and really I just want to read because I want to know more about space-time, and all that.

Dr. Hawking has a clear way of expressing himself so that people like me (an English teacher) can understand.

[EinsteinVsHawking]

you can see the 46 m. film without cuts at lhcdefenceorg

[EinsteinVsHawking]

cosmic rays are 'WEAK' lonely protons, not quarks, LHC makes STRONG quarks with millions of heavy atoms. never EVER 1 quark has been seen in cosmic rays in 30 years. Only QUARKS create MASS BOMBS WITH STRONG FORCES, novas and black holes - Einstein's frozen stars. The Nuclear Company lies TO THE PRESS, i have billionth times more ENERGY than cosmic rays but im harmless cause have weak forces as they do. Deconfined QUARK BOMBS ONLY happen IN NOVAS & BLOW UP stars NOW ALSO ON EARTH. CERN lies, ok?

[NoOne3234]

.............

Wow. I think you just proved my point. You don't understand or don't care to think about it.

The LHC collides 2 PROTONS with a center of mass energy of 14 TeV, hence the name Large Hadron Collider. I just explained that it was analogous to a very high energy cosmic ray strike in both energy( though slightly less) and particles involved.

Note: I actually did the calculations.

[EinsteinVsHawking]

you are definetely nuts, lhc stands for large hadron collider, hadron is an atom of massive number of quarks, on top of that, there is a process called stockastic cooling that will mass millions of lead atoms to create millions of quarks and acheive what cosmic rays never achieve: collisions that are so precise that break and liberate millions of quarks, 10.000 quarks form a mass-bomb, we calculated chances of millions of lead atoms in cosmic rays as 1 in a trillionth of a trillionth, NEVER

[NoOne3234]

The LHC collides two 7 Tev electrons. This is equivalent to a hydrogen target being slammed by protons at 1.9 *10^14 Mev.

Is there anything in nature like this? Actually, there is. Very high energy cosmic rays. Some have been observed at 3*10^14 Mev.

these strike 1 km^2 per century. or 4.5*10^8 strike the earth per century assume earth is a billion years old for ballpark estimate.

1/10^15 or 1/1000000000000000 chance of a catastrophic event.

[NoOne3234]

not electron protons.

[ifurn0]

The thing is, it is all just theory. If the LHC proves that absolutely nothing happens when 2 particals collide, therefore the whole bigbang theory gets wiped too?

[NoOne3234]

... No not really... If they find the higgs boson, they get another achievement for the standard model. If they don't, they get to figure out why not.

[EinsteinVsHawking]

the higgs is a particle invented because the standard model was closed and physicists needed to swindle reagan with billions $ for the SSC, in 1975 lee smolin and anthony zee proved higgs copying goldstone created a selfsimilar equation to brans-dicke model and nambu top quark deconfined field. cern knows the higgs is just a top quark expansive strong force field and that is why it lobbied to get him this year nobel prize.Problem is a top deconfined strong field will suck in earth's weak matter

[ifurn0]

Freaky last quote. Good film though.

[Raligard]

This is a terrible argument. Wow, just wow...

[Asstard006]

lol wat a dumbass