Added: 1 year ago
From: egsvideo
Views: 8,516
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hi, it would be to much to ask for the dates of the talks? I think I just saw two talks of Zizek in Hegel in inversed order. Anyway, as usual thanks a lot for your work.

  • No Slavoj, you need to read closely. The theory of the event as evanescent is dropped: the site is what 'flashes' in its paradoxical appearance. The event is not linked also to consequences, and marks the line of change from modification to the strong singularity. And this concerns the consequences of the event, insofar as they explain the effect on the inexistent: if the inexistent gathers maximal intensity after the site's appearing then it was an event. Zizek can't afford to be this sloppy.

  • @Krelianx it's pretty clear that you don't know what you're talking about so you decide to hide behind clever wording and syntax. try explaining your point in reference to pop culture, if you can't do that then you know that you actually don't have a point at all.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more