the only thing these 2 have in common is that they are the premier class of each type . but cant compare 2 to 4 wheels . 10 cyl to 4 . and 800 cc to a 3..0 . i love both but downforce is a huge advantage. but i think pounjd for pound a bike gets more hpper liter . rc211v had 260 . out of a 989 cc engine. N/A . in testing they got 300 bhp but the riders were faster with less . getting all that horse to the ground with a tiny piece of contact patch is very difficult
This race shows how much downforce matters. Motorcycles notoriously have very low downforce, and are notoriously "bad" aerodynamically (compared to a car) at high speeds. The F1 gets more downforce the faster you go and can take those corners at 180mph+!
Man, motogp guys have balls the size of planets. He's accelerating at he same speed as an F1 car, except his body is fully exposed and unprotected... respect.
@sultanabran1 What respect?? Even MotoGP guys like Stoner, Rossi said these guys have fucking guts to drive for such a long time getting those g forces and be so acurate..
@FERRARIAVI I like F1, I watch F1. I like it more than motogp, I'm just saying, Motogp riders have massive balls. I didn't say F1 drivers lack any skill or balls.
This old chestnut has been going on for years which is quicker, doesn't matter does it bikers like bikes and car lovers love their cars, that's all that really matters.
On the clip the car is always going to our run bikes !!!
i think u use the wrong examples to make your points here...the race with the boat and the bike was done on an abandoned airstrip, with dusty surface, with normal tires and with all the wings attached. and yet, they did 9secs with 1 try.
IF someone wanted to do the best 1/4 mile with an F1, he would use proper drag strip, sticky tires, and remove the wings, which produce tons of air resist.
dont forget F1, has about 0,6 kg/hp...thats better than most bikes, and a key to make a good 1/4 mile
if they see this video the F1 dont destroy the bike in acceleration (in line). F1 distance only when the bike slows down to the corner (where the car has much more advantage, especially in the corners and in wet conditions).
peace !
now i let you some accelerations of F1, MotoGP and Bugatti vs S1000RR
F1 accelerations 0-100 kmh 1.7 s 0-200 kmh 3.8 s 0-300 kmh 8.6 s * Every F1 car on the grid is capable of going from 0 to 160 kmh and back to 0 in less than 5 secs. * Figures are heavily dependent on gearing and aerodynamic setup. Moto GP accelarations 0-100 kmh 1.9 s 0-200 kmh 4.8 s 0-300 kmh 10.6 * s * Figures are heavily dependent on ratio gearbox setup. Now: Bugatti Veyron.0-100 kmh in 2.7s Approx. 200 and 300 kmh in 7.3s. and 16.7s BMW S1000RR 0-100 kmh 2.9 s 0-200kmh 7 s 0-299 kmh 17.6 s
in general a motorcycle is less expensive and if you are a good driver you burn every car ... and thats why i drive motorcycles, to show the old rich people who is boss ...
@Alecks1990 I don't think the rich people care about you and your stupid bike. They just laugh at you in their warm and dry BMW's when you are trying to prove something in rain.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Bikes are lame and soooo slow. F1 is also faster on straights and bikers are having hard times to accept that fact. There are videos about biker getting his butt raped by an F1 on a drag race.
Consider this: MotoGP is 30 secs slower than F1 in Monza. And that's really SLOW! Bikes are for slow and retarted people.
@riserbar, boi your a real sook like to see you hav the balls to do wat those bike guys are doin. like to see you go that fast on somethin with no down force!
@TradesBoy True about your comment to risebar's nonsense, can't believe he wrote bikes are slow and for retarded??? Motorcycle racers have balls the size of bananas! I have done both on track and I know two wheels as a motorsport is no joke, very physical & technical (yeah hanging on with just one leg's hampstring), and freaking DANGEROUS. The scary part.....when I have wheel spin on my Honda EG race car, i can correct it, while as on motorcycle it was always high side and pain.
@Paulwander Actually, let everyone read and feel his stupidity so it entertains the day. That's partially what utube's comment section's about. His reasoning simply amazes me (in a bad way of course). Comparing two totally different yet both extremely demanding and dangerous motorsport, and the "bikes are slow and for retarded people." what a numbnut.
@riserbar Your one of those complete idiots who only thing about being fast. I assume you don't ride a motorcycle? Its two completely different motorsport. You are comparing 2 wheels with 4. F1 Requires great skill, MotoGP requires great skill, WRC requires great skills. But its a completely different feeling for each type and it requires different skills. Learn to appreciate and respect each motorsport.
@riserbar bikes are slow? seriously you dont know shit about both sports power to wieght ratio a PRODCUTION liter bikes is equal to a F1 car dumbass, f1 cars are only quicker because of traction and areadynamic not becuase of brute enige power or HP, cars in general are all slower then bikes. a stock CBR1000RR 2010-08 Is only .5-6s slower then a f1 in the 1/4mile and pros have ran high 8s with stock busa..which is clearly quicker then any f1 car in the 1/4mile
@TurboNosHayabusa1 Well whereas I would agree that almost no street legal car can beat a Busa or a BMW S1000RR etc, there is at least one.
The Koenigsegg Agera R, it can go 0-322 Kmh faster than any other street legal bike or car. It does it at 17.68 seconds. Then again it IS a HYPER car, and it cost 1.5 mil.
@Swecan76 There are lots of cars that can beat a stock busa or a S1000rr, but when you meet something like Shane Stubbs' turbo busa, nothing comes close. Search for Ben Beckert vs Shane Stubbs. You will find it enlightening. :) Those are street legal bikes too....
I was more referring to "stock" production cars and bikes.
Two things that would be useful on such tricked out bikes, the back stabilizer bar/wheels to prevent wheelie when accelerating or a very long stretched out frame for the bike, with a lot of front end weight.
Bikes can be stupid quick, but most of the time it's hampered by the physics of making it into a damned wheelie.
@Swecan76 In this case, a stock Y2K would do 0 - 214mph in 14 seconds... streetlegal, not that conventional, but still stock. :) Beats the Koenigsegg....
Bikes are lame and soooo slow. F1 is also faster on straights and bikers are having hard times to accept that fact. There are videos about biker getting his ass raped by an F1 on a drag race.
Consider this: MotoGP is 30 secs slower than F1 in Monza. And that's really SLOW! Bikes are for slow and retarted people.
@riserbar also moto gp bike off the line and down a short straight will beat a f1 car because areodynamics doesnt apply to low to mid speeds. with only 230hp moto gp bike will kill a f1 in the 1/4mile..a road race bikes will lose of course to traction and braking which are the only reasons, and even at that a high speed turn moto gp can hang with a f1 car..your dumbass to believe bikes are slow because in every aspect of racing except f1 car sCARS LIVE IN BIKES SHADOW!!
@barcode0954 There's a video "F1 vs. MotoGP Drag Race" in which the F1 clearly beats the bike. I have no idea what are you trying to explain, but F1's are faster in all aspects. Why can't you just accept that? Bikes are slow. Record times for Monza: ca. 1:20 for F1 and 1:50 for MotoGP. Bikes 30 SECS SLOWER! Btw, in that video we didn't see how the bike was hanging with the F1, instead we saw how the bike was quickly dropped.
@riserbar thatt bikes arent slow of course the f1 was going to win that race that rider isnt even a drag racer ! so how could execpt a rider with only road racing exprience to beat a car like a f1, now saying that put mike slowe or ricky gadson on a moto gp bike an drag race a F1 the f1 will lose there only 9s cars which like i said STOCK sportbikes have hit 8s in the 1/4mile 230hp is more then enough to run low 9s with easy which what a F1 car does....
@riserbar the fact is a F1 car is only fast like constantly keep saying because of areodaynamic and traction on the track...which in a drag race the one with best reaction times and shitfs win. a pro drag race will eat a f1 car alive an the facts are on the interent., as far as road racing since bikes are 2 wheeled they cant corner as well as a car or stop as well they have to brake harder and ealier unlike a car...its not saying much when you beat bike in F1 car!
@barcode0954 i am reading your comments, and its strange how u keep insisting on your wrong opinion.
u compare drag cars with F1. then i say, u try and corner with a drag car...u will get off road for sure.
the fact is that F1 cars are the fastest vehicles on earth, with capability to change direction too"
as for bike vs f1 drag race...F1 hits 300km/h in 9secs, with all the wings that create downforce...imagine what it can do without wings in a drag race...and with proper tires ofc
@dimos47ki7 " the fact is that F1 cars are the fastest vehicles " lol really lol the fastest in a curicit or road race, but there street legal sport bikes and drag cars that make f1s look silly in the 1/4mile or drag race..it takes the f1 9s to do 186mph? it takes 7.9-6.915s for the fastest cars and bike to do 200+ in the 1/4mile. im not going to argue moto gps are faster then f1s because there not, BUT recently moto gp has been putting out faster speed then f1..
@barcode0954 i did mention "with capability to change direction"
it takes 9secs with all the wings which create 2 tons of downforce. and that with normal track tires. if they fitted some sticky drag tires the result would be much different
in a desert where they tested an F1 without the wings it hits about 500km/h.
@dimos47ki7 a f1 wont beat a pro-street bike in race or any 7-high 6.9 cars in race bro...just quit it... its not going to happen fastest street legal machine does 6.912 and its a retired turbo busa. and to be in that class it ran it had restrictions ..the fastest mile right now is from another turbo busa that did 278mph which every mile race theres always a new champ..do you have proof of a f1 doing almost 310mph? because i call bullshit on that!
@dimos47ki7 your full of shit the fastest speed a f1 has gone is 244mph wich is slower THEN most alot of the turbo busa running the standing mile, the f1 car ran on the salt flats which means also the it took longer for the F1 to get to speed then any of the turbo bike or fast cars running in the standing mile there are few producation cars that are faster then f1s..like i said show me were a F1 has EVER done 310mph which is 500kmph ! but if there isnt then shut the fuck up!!!!
@dimos47ki7 what a stupid comparison top fuel drag cars,funny cars and top fuel drag bikes are the quickest machines on land why would i compare a street legal bike or car to something that does atleast 250 in 5s-300 4.5s ????
@dimos47ki7 because it takes more then areo dynamics and 800hp and proper traction and stick drag tires to do faster then 6.9s..this isnt curict dude..the f1 car did race with a boat and cbr1000 and its fastest time was 9 seconds..hmmm the bikes was 10..i can compare a pro-street bike ect.. to a f1 because you said it takes 9s to do 186mph and for of some of there slower ama drag bikes and fast cars the f1 is idintical in preformance as for as straight line!
@barcode0954 but if you want to talk about performance in the form each vehicle is, then i agree. a drag bike will win an F1 car with wings and normal tires at a 1/4 mile. but of course thats not what an F1 car was designed for. it was designed to run around a track at the fastest possible time, and there is NO car or bike that can be faster around a track PERIOD.
and of course a pro drag car or bike will probably be faster than a normal F1 on a drag race
world wide web f1complete com /content/view/4638/389/ The bike is faster on a straight, shame they never made a special bike but it would ruin racing.
@benjyboba I don't have the information to back me up, but I highly doubt that a motoGP bike can reach 300km/h faster than F1. A motoGP's win drag is larger than F1 car. Correct me if I am wrong tho.
Does anyone who watched this actually realise that the bike had to shut off power much sooner and brake earlier. Maybe one day they will develop downforce for the bike and have a fairer contest. On second thoughts they probably never will due to health and safety in case the biker highsided with too much g force in the corner would send them into space. lol. There both fun in their own ways.
@churros4ever a motoGP bike will always do it slower compare to F1 cars man....I personally don't think F1s are cars. They are insanely powerful engines (very little similarity to production engines) bolted to wheeled chassis with extreme downforce, which enable them to corner at 300+km/h on flat out curves! But a bunch of bikes in a corner, or a whole group of bikes making chicane turns with the camera lens in front...that's always exciting to see.
Why are you guys saying which is more difficult? Absolutely stupid... Every motorsport is difficult in their own aspect. For a motorcycle going around a corner, you could go flying if you slip. At least there is still a cage for F1. True it is difficult, but you can't criticize the sport.
Try constantly slipping in rally next to rocks, cliffs and trees. Whats worst?
Same with taming a bike on a corner...You slip, you go flying and do a high side and break bones on your feet, ankle..hand... and most riders still race withe their injuries by the next race. Not dogging F1..but you CAN NOT compare the two....It's two different worlds! Both sports take skills.
and your saying that a moto gp rider is not in shape??? Um they basically steer the bike with their whole body!? Imagine doing that for 20 laps leaning and picking up your bike that ways two times your body weight.. Most of those Moto Gp racers race with broken bones and fresh wounds from previous crashes... There have even been Moto racers that switched to Formula one and won a title (John surtees) 1964. Can you name a F1 champ that went to Moto gp and won a title? I respect all motorsports.
@alexwribs19 nope I didn't say that. You did. Yes, they're "in shape" but if you think that they're any where near to sustaining up to 6 g's, you are mistaken. If that isn't clear, that's 6 gravities. Take any weight in lbs, and multiply by 6.
well Valentino Rossi did lap times close to Schumacher on a Ferrari F1 car, and like i said. There has been Moto riders that transitioned to F1 in history. All it takes is training and hard work. It can be done.
but you said they won't be able to take the g's of an F1 car, but they did. Rossi for example went full out testing a ferrari f1. It's either you have it or you don't. Anyway both are dangerous sports. both require skills and concentration.
I said, the average; you provided one example. And now you're also implying he did no further training to do it. Do you have proof that he literally just hopped in? Either way, like I said, "the average moto gp rider. "
what track and corners do F1s take upto 6gs? i've never heard of this. the most i've heard is 4.8-5g under breaking and 2.2ish on hard, fast corners. It's not JUST about how many G forces the drivers and riders take...get the f*ck over it and think about how much skill it takes to really push these incredible machines.
Turkish gp, up to 7 seconds of 5 gs, sustained. I've never once talked about skill or even attempted to quantify it. Enough of the straw man arguments. Ddeejay suggested putting Jenson on a bike, so I said why not put an average moto gp rider in an f1. Do I really have to explain that? It's not that difficult. Stop getting your panties all bunched up.
Motegi?
Grasskate 2 weeks ago
F1 pisses on anything and everything.
Always has been.
Get over it.
christosswc 4 weeks ago
the only thing these 2 have in common is that they are the premier class of each type . but cant compare 2 to 4 wheels . 10 cyl to 4 . and 800 cc to a 3..0 . i love both but downforce is a huge advantage. but i think pounjd for pound a bike gets more hpper liter . rc211v had 260 . out of a 989 cc engine. N/A . in testing they got 300 bhp but the riders were faster with less . getting all that horse to the ground with a tiny piece of contact patch is very difficult
mushrume 1 month ago 2
can't fuck with a f1 . ~1000hp ~500kg
darealcase 2 months ago
Formula 1 Rules!!!
formula1nh 2 months ago
f1 rules baby!
volikoto 2 months ago
jet airplane#1 and f1#2
1dogeez 3 months ago
so cooooool!!
dodgevan318 3 months ago
the F1 could not wheelie..that's horrible
MrUwekkkkkk 3 months ago 4
@MrUwekkkkkk amen _O_
pedroalextiago 3 months ago
@MrUwekkkkkk I fucking lold XD
christosswc 4 weeks ago
@3:08 is that the downforce?!
Kenshin851 4 months ago
@Kenshin851 yes
madmansully123 2 months ago
True MotoGP is slower. But nothing touches my CBR1000RR in the streets. May you could pull up in a T1 and prove me wrong.
Liist 4 months ago
This race shows how much downforce matters. Motorcycles notoriously have very low downforce, and are notoriously "bad" aerodynamically (compared to a car) at high speeds. The F1 gets more downforce the faster you go and can take those corners at 180mph+!
cxbra 5 months ago
I really like cars as well, but you can't do a wheelie with a car...I love my bike...:D
kawafanatic 5 months ago
Man, motogp guys have balls the size of planets. He's accelerating at he same speed as an F1 car, except his body is fully exposed and unprotected... respect.
sultanabran1 8 months ago
@sultanabran1 What respect?? Even MotoGP guys like Stoner, Rossi said these guys have fucking guts to drive for such a long time getting those g forces and be so acurate..
FERRARIAVI 8 months ago
@FERRARIAVI I like F1, I watch F1. I like it more than motogp, I'm just saying, Motogp riders have massive balls. I didn't say F1 drivers lack any skill or balls.
sultanabran1 8 months ago
Button must be bored out of his mind driving an oval.
sultanabran1 8 months ago
That looks like an Indy car.
AsianPerson3 8 months ago
@AsianPerson3 but it's not
sultanabran1 8 months ago
@sultanabran1 Just sayin
AsianPerson3 8 months ago
This old chestnut has been going on for years which is quicker, doesn't matter does it bikers like bikes and car lovers love their cars, that's all that really matters.
On the clip the car is always going to our run bikes !!!
greatroads 9 months ago
wow... the only time I have ever seen vapor trails going into a corner like that was from a sprint car on a VERY moist night
RebelSoul2010 10 months ago
@RebelSoul2010 must not have watched too much f1 then
cummins24421 9 months ago
i think u use the wrong examples to make your points here...the race with the boat and the bike was done on an abandoned airstrip, with dusty surface, with normal tires and with all the wings attached. and yet, they did 9secs with 1 try.
IF someone wanted to do the best 1/4 mile with an F1, he would use proper drag strip, sticky tires, and remove the wings, which produce tons of air resist.
dont forget F1, has about 0,6 kg/hp...thats better than most bikes, and a key to make a good 1/4 mile
dimos47ki7 1 year ago
those bike boys got more balls than me, going that fast ON something vs IN something lol
worldtravel101 1 year ago
salute to the rider coz have guts to push to 300kph!!! gives me goosebumps
jongkongmas 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if they see this video the F1 dont destroy the bike in acceleration (in line). F1 distance only when the bike slows down to the corner (where the car has much more advantage, especially in the corners and in wet conditions).
peace !
now i let you some accelerations of F1, MotoGP and Bugatti vs S1000RR
bruninja 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
F1 accelerations 0-100 kmh 1.7 s 0-200 kmh 3.8 s 0-300 kmh 8.6 s * Every F1 car on the grid is capable of going from 0 to 160 kmh and back to 0 in less than 5 secs. * Figures are heavily dependent on gearing and aerodynamic setup. Moto GP accelarations 0-100 kmh 1.9 s 0-200 kmh 4.8 s 0-300 kmh 10.6 * s * Figures are heavily dependent on ratio gearbox setup. Now: Bugatti Veyron.0-100 kmh in 2.7s Approx. 200 and 300 kmh in 7.3s. and 16.7s BMW S1000RR 0-100 kmh 2.9 s 0-200kmh 7 s 0-299 kmh 17.6 s
bruninja 1 year ago
in general a motorcycle is less expensive and if you are a good driver you burn every car ... and thats why i drive motorcycles, to show the old rich people who is boss ...
Alecks1990 1 year ago 12
@Alecks1990 I don't think the rich people care about you and your stupid bike. They just laugh at you in their warm and dry BMW's when you are trying to prove something in rain.
riserbar 1 year ago
i love motogp but 4 wheels will outcorner 2 wheels.. especially a f1 cart
johnoppa 1 year ago
I think this F1 Driver is probably bored out of his mind.
MustangsCanTurnToo 1 year ago
what the fuck is this again? the reala grag race is from stop in straight line... and the f1 car will not stand a chance against a moto gp bike.
bonebreaker27 1 year ago
@bonebreaker27 There are video's here on youtube that say otherwise, an F1 car murdered a GP bag, F1 cars can beat anything.
NANOFORGE 1 year ago
@NANOFORGE "GP BIKE".
NANOFORGE 1 year ago
They didnt dare to race after one shot.. After the motogp was demolished at turn 1.. Haha.. No folks nothing can beat F1..
FERRARIAVI 1 year ago 15
@FERRARIAVI a Top Fuel dragster can beat a F1 car on the 1/4 mile ! ^^
Betontod95 8 months ago
@Betontod95 Can a top fuel dragstar go flat out through Eau Rouge? Haha dont compare fucking Dragsters with F1.. F1 are built for tracks not drags..
FERRARIAVI 8 months ago
....that sound....
mireandric 1 year ago
damn sounds like a a stuka!!
woodenclock2 1 year ago
Japanese now into oval circuit motorsport? I've always thought oval rings are unique to the American motorsport scene only?
golferchin76 1 year ago
Love the noise. Can't ever get enough. Ride on my friends.
lifeisgood070 1 year ago
they're not racing against each other it's just for show
jakestarbbq 1 year ago
why does the bike let off
mark600rider 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bikes are lame and soooo slow. F1 is also faster on straights and bikers are having hard times to accept that fact. There are videos about biker getting his butt raped by an F1 on a drag race.
Consider this: MotoGP is 30 secs slower than F1 in Monza. And that's really SLOW! Bikes are for slow and retarted people.
riserbar 1 year ago
@riserbar, boi your a real sook like to see you hav the balls to do wat those bike guys are doin. like to see you go that fast on somethin with no down force!
TradesBoy 1 year ago
@TradesBoy True about your comment to risebar's nonsense, can't believe he wrote bikes are slow and for retarded??? Motorcycle racers have balls the size of bananas! I have done both on track and I know two wheels as a motorsport is no joke, very physical & technical (yeah hanging on with just one leg's hampstring), and freaking DANGEROUS. The scary part.....when I have wheel spin on my Honda EG race car, i can correct it, while as on motorcycle it was always high side and pain.
golferchin76 1 year ago
@riserbar
You are dumb.
How the hell can u call 200mph slow - what a retard...
Everyone: Can you please thumps down, this idiot, so no one else has to suffer reading his stupidity.
Paulwander 1 year ago
@Paulwander Actually, let everyone read and feel his stupidity so it entertains the day. That's partially what utube's comment section's about. His reasoning simply amazes me (in a bad way of course). Comparing two totally different yet both extremely demanding and dangerous motorsport, and the "bikes are slow and for retarded people." what a numbnut.
golferchin76 1 year ago
@riserbar Your one of those complete idiots who only thing about being fast. I assume you don't ride a motorcycle? Its two completely different motorsport. You are comparing 2 wheels with 4. F1 Requires great skill, MotoGP requires great skill, WRC requires great skills. But its a completely different feeling for each type and it requires different skills. Learn to appreciate and respect each motorsport.
MyChib 1 year ago
@riserbar bikes are slow? seriously you dont know shit about both sports power to wieght ratio a PRODCUTION liter bikes is equal to a F1 car dumbass, f1 cars are only quicker because of traction and areadynamic not becuase of brute enige power or HP, cars in general are all slower then bikes. a stock CBR1000RR 2010-08 Is only .5-6s slower then a f1 in the 1/4mile and pros have ran high 8s with stock busa..which is clearly quicker then any f1 car in the 1/4mile
barcode0954 1 year ago
@riserbar Oh yeah? Fuck you and take any street legal car u can find and beat a turbo busa in the standing mile. 278mph. No car comes close.
TurboNosHayabusa1 1 month ago
@TurboNosHayabusa1 Well whereas I would agree that almost no street legal car can beat a Busa or a BMW S1000RR etc, there is at least one.
The Koenigsegg Agera R, it can go 0-322 Kmh faster than any other street legal bike or car. It does it at 17.68 seconds. Then again it IS a HYPER car, and it cost 1.5 mil.
Swecan76 1 week ago
@Swecan76 There are lots of cars that can beat a stock busa or a S1000rr, but when you meet something like Shane Stubbs' turbo busa, nothing comes close. Search for Ben Beckert vs Shane Stubbs. You will find it enlightening. :) Those are street legal bikes too....
TurboNosHayabusa1 1 week ago
@TurboNosHayabusa1 Yeah but that is a highly tricked out Busa.
I was more referring to "stock" production cars and bikes.
Two things that would be useful on such tricked out bikes, the back stabilizer bar/wheels to prevent wheelie when accelerating or a very long stretched out frame for the bike, with a lot of front end weight.
Bikes can be stupid quick, but most of the time it's hampered by the physics of making it into a damned wheelie.
Swecan76 1 week ago
@Swecan76 In this case, a stock Y2K would do 0 - 214mph in 14 seconds... streetlegal, not that conventional, but still stock. :) Beats the Koenigsegg....
TurboNosHayabusa1 1 week ago
@TurboNosHayabusa1 True, but it's a fricken JET ON 2 WHEELS LOL...
Swecan76 1 week ago
@Swecan76 Still..... rofl! :)
TurboNosHayabusa1 1 week ago
Bikes are lame and soooo slow. F1 is also faster on straights and bikers are having hard times to accept that fact. There are videos about biker getting his ass raped by an F1 on a drag race.
Consider this: MotoGP is 30 secs slower than F1 in Monza. And that's really SLOW! Bikes are for slow and retarted people.
riserbar 1 year ago
@riserbar also moto gp bike off the line and down a short straight will beat a f1 car because areodynamics doesnt apply to low to mid speeds. with only 230hp moto gp bike will kill a f1 in the 1/4mile..a road race bikes will lose of course to traction and braking which are the only reasons, and even at that a high speed turn moto gp can hang with a f1 car..your dumbass to believe bikes are slow because in every aspect of racing except f1 car sCARS LIVE IN BIKES SHADOW!!
barcode0954 1 year ago
@barcode0954 There's a video "F1 vs. MotoGP Drag Race" in which the F1 clearly beats the bike. I have no idea what are you trying to explain, but F1's are faster in all aspects. Why can't you just accept that? Bikes are slow. Record times for Monza: ca. 1:20 for F1 and 1:50 for MotoGP. Bikes 30 SECS SLOWER! Btw, in that video we didn't see how the bike was hanging with the F1, instead we saw how the bike was quickly dropped.
riserbar 1 year ago
@riserbar thatt bikes arent slow of course the f1 was going to win that race that rider isnt even a drag racer ! so how could execpt a rider with only road racing exprience to beat a car like a f1, now saying that put mike slowe or ricky gadson on a moto gp bike an drag race a F1 the f1 will lose there only 9s cars which like i said STOCK sportbikes have hit 8s in the 1/4mile 230hp is more then enough to run low 9s with easy which what a F1 car does....
barcode0954 1 year ago
@riserbar the fact is a F1 car is only fast like constantly keep saying because of areodaynamic and traction on the track...which in a drag race the one with best reaction times and shitfs win. a pro drag race will eat a f1 car alive an the facts are on the interent., as far as road racing since bikes are 2 wheeled they cant corner as well as a car or stop as well they have to brake harder and ealier unlike a car...its not saying much when you beat bike in F1 car!
barcode0954 1 year ago
@barcode0954 i am reading your comments, and its strange how u keep insisting on your wrong opinion.
u compare drag cars with F1. then i say, u try and corner with a drag car...u will get off road for sure.
the fact is that F1 cars are the fastest vehicles on earth, with capability to change direction too"
as for bike vs f1 drag race...F1 hits 300km/h in 9secs, with all the wings that create downforce...imagine what it can do without wings in a drag race...and with proper tires ofc
dimos47ki7 1 year ago
@dimos47ki7 " the fact is that F1 cars are the fastest vehicles " lol really lol the fastest in a curicit or road race, but there street legal sport bikes and drag cars that make f1s look silly in the 1/4mile or drag race..it takes the f1 9s to do 186mph? it takes 7.9-6.915s for the fastest cars and bike to do 200+ in the 1/4mile. im not going to argue moto gps are faster then f1s because there not, BUT recently moto gp has been putting out faster speed then f1..
barcode0954 1 year ago
@barcode0954 i did mention "with capability to change direction"
it takes 9secs with all the wings which create 2 tons of downforce. and that with normal track tires. if they fitted some sticky drag tires the result would be much different
in a desert where they tested an F1 without the wings it hits about 500km/h.
dimos47ki7 1 year ago
@dimos47ki7 a f1 wont beat a pro-street bike in race or any 7-high 6.9 cars in race bro...just quit it... its not going to happen fastest street legal machine does 6.912 and its a retired turbo busa. and to be in that class it ran it had restrictions ..the fastest mile right now is from another turbo busa that did 278mph which every mile race theres always a new champ..do you have proof of a f1 doing almost 310mph? because i call bullshit on that!
barcode0954 1 year ago
@dimos47ki7 your full of shit the fastest speed a f1 has gone is 244mph wich is slower THEN most alot of the turbo busa running the standing mile, the f1 car ran on the salt flats which means also the it took longer for the F1 to get to speed then any of the turbo bike or fast cars running in the standing mile there are few producation cars that are faster then f1s..like i said show me were a F1 has EVER done 310mph which is 500kmph ! but if there isnt then shut the fuck up!!!!
barcode0954 1 year ago
@barcode0954 yeah i was wrong about 500, it was 413 kph or 256mph on an airport watch?v=W82DsPkgV-U
and they didnt mind acceleration, as i said, with proper drag tires the F1 would accelerate faster than most motogp bikes.
and stop comparing drag bikes like the turbo busas with F1. u should compare busas with top fuel cars, and then bikes lose again
dimos47ki7 1 year ago
@dimos47ki7 what a stupid comparison top fuel drag cars,funny cars and top fuel drag bikes are the quickest machines on land why would i compare a street legal bike or car to something that does atleast 250 in 5s-300 4.5s ????
barcode0954 1 year ago
@barcode0954 u are the one who put into comparison a busa with drag tires and F1 with race tires.
u dont even know what an F1 could do with some sticky tires because its never been tried...and neither do i.
so until we find some proof of 1/4 mile times of an F1 with sticky tires, we cant know what happens.
i mean, how can u know what time an F1 would do with sticky tires and proper gearing???
dimos47ki7 1 year ago
@dimos47ki7 because it takes more then areo dynamics and 800hp and proper traction and stick drag tires to do faster then 6.9s..this isnt curict dude..the f1 car did race with a boat and cbr1000 and its fastest time was 9 seconds..hmmm the bikes was 10..i can compare a pro-street bike ect.. to a f1 because you said it takes 9s to do 186mph and for of some of there slower ama drag bikes and fast cars the f1 is idintical in preformance as for as straight line!
barcode0954 1 year ago
@barcode0954 but if you want to talk about performance in the form each vehicle is, then i agree. a drag bike will win an F1 car with wings and normal tires at a 1/4 mile. but of course thats not what an F1 car was designed for. it was designed to run around a track at the fastest possible time, and there is NO car or bike that can be faster around a track PERIOD.
and of course a pro drag car or bike will probably be faster than a normal F1 on a drag race
dimos47ki7 1 year ago
world wide web f1complete com /content/view/4638/389/ The bike is faster on a straight, shame they never made a special bike but it would ruin racing.
benjyboba 1 year ago
@benjyboba I don't have the information to back me up, but I highly doubt that a motoGP bike can reach 300km/h faster than F1. A motoGP's win drag is larger than F1 car. Correct me if I am wrong tho.
golferchin76 1 year ago
Does anyone who watched this actually realise that the bike had to shut off power much sooner and brake earlier. Maybe one day they will develop downforce for the bike and have a fairer contest. On second thoughts they probably never will due to health and safety in case the biker highsided with too much g force in the corner would send them into space. lol. There both fun in their own ways.
benjyboba 2 years ago
F1 is a incredible machine, but a bike in a corner...
no chance to rc212v, in this circuit, now put it in norrmal circuit e tell me after that
churros4ever 2 years ago
f1 destroys it im afraid...theres a track where moto gp and f1 go at same time on different screens...f1 like 30 secs ahead after 1st lap
wr1swd84 2 years ago
@churros4ever a motoGP bike will always do it slower compare to F1 cars man....I personally don't think F1s are cars. They are insanely powerful engines (very little similarity to production engines) bolted to wheeled chassis with extreme downforce, which enable them to corner at 300+km/h on flat out curves! But a bunch of bikes in a corner, or a whole group of bikes making chicane turns with the camera lens in front...that's always exciting to see.
golferchin76 1 year ago
Why are you guys saying which is more difficult? Absolutely stupid... Every motorsport is difficult in their own aspect. For a motorcycle going around a corner, you could go flying if you slip. At least there is still a cage for F1. True it is difficult, but you can't criticize the sport.
Try constantly slipping in rally next to rocks, cliffs and trees. Whats worst?
Every sport is an art.
MyChib 2 years ago 21
Put jenson button on a bike xDDD
I think and i prove that ride a bike at high speed on corners it's so dificult, you depend entire of the movement of your body.
It's an art!
ddeejayy 2 years ago
put your mum on the bike
wr1swd84 2 years ago
and taming 850 bhp with no traction control through rear wheels is an art and let me tel you bikes cant corner like f1 which makes f1 alot scarier..
wr1swd84 2 years ago
Same with taming a bike on a corner...You slip, you go flying and do a high side and break bones on your feet, ankle..hand... and most riders still race withe their injuries by the next race. Not dogging F1..but you CAN NOT compare the two....It's two different worlds! Both sports take skills.
alexwribs19 2 years ago
And put your average moto gp rider in an f1 car, and he probably won't be in the physical shape necessary to handle the 4-6 g's.
moogleii 2 years ago
and your saying that a moto gp rider is not in shape??? Um they basically steer the bike with their whole body!? Imagine doing that for 20 laps leaning and picking up your bike that ways two times your body weight.. Most of those Moto Gp racers race with broken bones and fresh wounds from previous crashes... There have even been Moto racers that switched to Formula one and won a title (John surtees) 1964. Can you name a F1 champ that went to Moto gp and won a title? I respect all motorsports.
alexwribs19 2 years ago
@alexwribs19 nope I didn't say that. You did. Yes, they're "in shape" but if you think that they're any where near to sustaining up to 6 g's, you are mistaken. If that isn't clear, that's 6 gravities. Take any weight in lbs, and multiply by 6.
moogleii 2 years ago
well Valentino Rossi did lap times close to Schumacher on a Ferrari F1 car, and like i said. There has been Moto riders that transitioned to F1 in history. All it takes is training and hard work. It can be done.
alexwribs19 2 years ago
Yeah, no one ever contested that...With training and hard work, I'm sure he could complete astronaut training, or be a navy seal.
moogleii 2 years ago
but you said they won't be able to take the g's of an F1 car, but they did. Rossi for example went full out testing a ferrari f1. It's either you have it or you don't. Anyway both are dangerous sports. both require skills and concentration.
alexwribs19 2 years ago
I said, the average; you provided one example. And now you're also implying he did no further training to do it. Do you have proof that he literally just hopped in? Either way, like I said, "the average moto gp rider. "
moogleii 2 years ago
what track and corners do F1s take upto 6gs? i've never heard of this. the most i've heard is 4.8-5g under breaking and 2.2ish on hard, fast corners. It's not JUST about how many G forces the drivers and riders take...get the f*ck over it and think about how much skill it takes to really push these incredible machines.
spriggan969 2 years ago
Turkish gp, up to 7 seconds of 5 gs, sustained. I've never once talked about skill or even attempted to quantify it. Enough of the straw man arguments. Ddeejay suggested putting Jenson on a bike, so I said why not put an average moto gp rider in an f1. Do I really have to explain that? It's not that difficult. Stop getting your panties all bunched up.
moogleii 2 years ago
yeah your right although theres alot more technique to riding a motorcycle than driving a car
standaway1 2 years ago
le F1 sono imbattibili!
Lorenzsempai 2 years ago
so cool
qwazzymodo191 2 years ago