And there are HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS, if not MILLIONS of EX-scientologists, who are now OUT.
Of course, most of those were simply "first-time-book-buyers," did a basic course and/or introductory lecture. And after that they ran in thge opposite direction from the cult; THEY RAN LIKE HELL FROM THE REGGES. ;D
They *solved* that "over-regging" problem Miscavige knows nothing of or is powerless to stop. ROFLMAO
@jdtrickster4 Thanks JD. I just recently found out that Randi is gay after 35 years of following his career and research. That must explain why he's such a S.P to the inhabitants of the Magic Kingdom.
All people who believe there is some crazy person sitting in the couds, wearing special underwear, watching everything we all do......are crazy! Crazy friggin losers!
the fact they these people actually almost IMMEDIATELY SEE FOR THEMSELVES that Scientology ACTUALLY WORKS has NOTHING to do with anything, right tricky?
Can a real scientologist explain to me how you buy in to this idiocy. How does it not even enter into your mind that Hubbard was a scifi writer and that maybe just maybe he made all if this silly shit up. I mean the whole premise if your religion is is like a science fiction movie... A bad one. I'm just curious because I am awfully tempted in targeting the idiots of this world for their money as Lron did. I mean if I don't someone else will.
Also, remember, the overwhelming majority of "scientologists" don't know what you do about Xenu and the dead-space-aliens or much of the "sci-fi space-opera."
It sort of comes across as a self-help pop-psychology, at first; which reminds me THIS is part of the CON or "Confidence game." One's confidence or trust is engaged and encouraged (fomented) while one's critical thinking is compromised & shut down.
"Lisa Macpherson was not held against her will and was in fact happy to be there. I find all those charges false and hereby dismissed" - Judge Quesada, Clearwater judge June 23, 2001
Has $cientology made a dent on its "Aims" of creating a world without criminality, insanity & war?
Not according to Reed Slatkin [now serving a 14 yr sentence for FRAUD] & most definitely not according to "Reverend" Rex Fowler, an OT8 [$cientology's highest available *awareness level* (The ones above it have not been "released" yet] who's now a convicted murderer doing life in prison
Davie Miscavige should be in prison for his participation in killing Lisa McPherson, among others. Won't be long.
$cientology and Dianetics are the sciences of the mind.........
...of the mind control, that is. And *brainwashing*
It is about money, greed, control and power. And it'll use any means necessary to "remove any counter-intention" to its efforts or ends. And yes, they DO justify the means::
Google *Scientology Controversies.* Or "Scientology," period.
The truth is out now. The cat's out of the proverbial bag - Thanx to the internet: $cientology's Waterloo.
Wow! Some of my comments have been removed. Im starting to wonder just who is running this show. So Im done here. Its funny that the Scientology freaks can say what they wish, yet Im sure this will be removed also. I can't help if Im not wanted. Bye!
I know that they kill. We know some they have killed. I would like to know were the trench is that the cult puts the bodies of those we never see on the videos anymore. Where is Miscaviges' wife, and so many others? What are your crimes Scientology? Where Are your children? Xenu returns June 23rd. Are you ready?
@vaLLarrr Difference is, "proton" is a useful word describing a concept for which there was no pre-existing term. "Enturbulate" was just a word L. Ron invented because he didn't know the word "agitate."
gee, too bad for you that you're too ignorant to know that there was no pre existing word for "enturbulate" EITHER, since it DOESN'T simply mean "agitate."
but that's ok, you REVEL in your ignorance, dont'cha digs. LOL
@vaLLarrr You see, vaL, when you say things like that, as opposed to posting someone else's quote and gloating, that's how I know that you've been stumped. You've been told there's something unique about the word "enturbulate," but damned if you can work out what it is.
@vaLLarrr How does it show me up as wrong? I said there was nothing unique about the word "enturbulate." You have failed to demonstrate otherwise. All you have shown is that your "confront" sucks balls.
@vaLLarrr I don't think I'll be going to all that trouble. Unlike you, I have a life. Anyway, if the derivation of the word is what matters, I already know that. Hubbard pulled it out of his ass.
your comment is as stupid as someone who says they're not going to go to all the trouble of finding out what "gravity" is, and will just stick with the "dictionary definition."
gravity |ˈgravitē|
noun
1 Physics the force that attracts a body toward the center of the earth.
@vaLLarrr Well, here's how it goes, vaL. I've looked in several glossaries, pro-, anti- and neutral towards Scientology. I've even looked on Scientology's official website. None of them suggest "enturbulate" means anything more than "upset" or "agitate." The only person suggesting it has any other meaning is you. Why should I believe you?
@vaLLarrr Because it would be a wild goose chase. Hundreds of pounds and countless hours to find this new definition of "enturbulation." If this definition really exists, I don't see why you couldn't just post it. All the evidence suggests that you're lying.
yea, that's as "valid" as someone who wants to know what "gravity" is in 25 words or less, because they "can't be bothered" to find out what it actually is.
and when you tell them to read the papers on General Relativity, they tell you that would be a "wild goose chase."
RIIIIIIGHT.
nice try though digs.
and anyone who is "convinced" by your "logic" belongs on your side digs.
@vaLLarrr But if I look into gravity, I can instantly see that there's more to it than a simple dictionary definition. Yet I look into "enturbulated," I see absolutely no reason to believe it means anything other than "agitated," other than the word of one sci-troll who is so shifty that s/he won't even say hir sex, age or nationality. Why waste my time?
@vaLLarrr Conduct basic research, vaL. Cast a beady eye over what's there. But I sense you're trying to stray from the point, so you and I will demonstrate my point here and now with the following question and your response.
Is the word "enturbulate" anything more than a synonym for "agitate" or "upset?"
@vaLLarrr Whatever. Four, five, quite a few, whatever. My question is this - why use it to non-Scientologists, as the guys in the video above do? And I'd be interested to hear how you phrase your reply here.
@vaLLarrr It's more than just my opinion. It's a standard technique used by politicians, cults, armed forces and anyone else who seeks to influence the way people think. When you change the way people speak and use vocabulary, you create mental blocks with regard to their expression. It's a form of brainwashing. Very L. Ron Hubbard.
@vaLLarrr The physicists are genuinely describing things for which there are no words, and politicians are indeed trying to influence the way people think. That's why they're so fond of slogans and buzzwords. In a closed environment like a cult, of course, it also serves to create insularity from the outside world. Hence the fact that so many cults like to use alternative vocabulary.
and I guess when sailors refer to a wall as a "bulkhead," and a floor as the "deck" and a ceiling as an "overhead," it's because they're trying to "influence the way people think," and the navy is a "sinister cult," right digs?
@vaLLarrr Sorry for the delay in replying, my social calendar is kinda busy at this time of year. Well, the armed forces do like their recruits obedient and unthinking, so yes, that is appropriate.
Have you never wondered why you have that list of copypasta to reply to people with? It's so you can reply with minimal thought. And there's less risk of you having the thoughts the Church of Scientology doesn't want you to have.
@vaLLarrr Quite a lot of that reply there was copy-pasted. Keep thought to a minimum, right? You wouldn't want to end up as a "Potential Trouble Source," now, would you? Isn't it interesting that despite Scientology's incredibly powerful "tech," it's considered damaging for you to even talk to "Suppressives." Why do you think that is, vaL?
@vaLLarrr And there's another technique to prevent you thinking too hard about criticisms of Scientology. "Attack the attacker." Make wild (and again copy-pasted) allegations against the person making the criticism rather than actually addressing the criticism head-on and again, being forced to think. You're making real progress.
oh right digs. only YOU can make wild allegations against someone that they're using inappropriately using "copy pasta" when they're NOT, and then demand that THEY prove they're not NOT doing that, when YOU haven't proved that they ARE.
which of course means that YOU are the one not addressing the criticism head on because you simply BRUSH IT OFF as "copy pasta" when it ISN'T.
RIIIIIGHT.
how convenient for you.
I wish I could say you're making any progress whatsoever.
@vaLLarrr Also, why do you think the Church of Scientology doesn't want you talking to "Suppressives?" I mean, surely if Scientology "tech" was so powerful, it wouldn't matter who you spoke to?
@vaLLarrr I'm not demanding that you prove anything, vaL. But because you're not paying attention (because that would involve thinking, which the CoS doesn't want you to do), you don't realise that you're actually proving my point without any effort at all from either of us. Also, labelling all enemies of the CoS (or "Suppressives")as "psychos?" That's another thought-blocking technique. So what's your plan for Christmas? YouTube again?
digs, anyone who who is too stupid not to realize that you simply blather and assert things as if they're "true," and never back up a damn thing you say belongs on your side anyway.
@vaLLarrr I don't need to back anything up, because you're doing it for me. Everything you say is a perfect demonstration of cult thought-blocking techniques. Copypasta? Check. Attack the attacker? Check. Insults? Check. Do yourself a favour and ask: why would the "benevolent" Church of Scientology discourage independent thought? What don't they want you thinking about? What conclusions are they afraid you'll reach?
@vaLLarrr You're comparing you being a dick on YouTube to the military strategy of Sun Tzu? Because that's another typical cult technique - convince members that what they're doing is of greater importance to the world than it is. Because "outsiders" don't see the tremendous importance, it makes it easy for you to dismiss them. So you don't have to listen to them. And don't have to think. Because the CoS doesn't want you doing that.
@vaLLarrr Someone's not in the festive spirit this year... vaL, according to you I'm a criminal gangster murderer neo-Nazi psychopath rapist who is a member of a worldwide terrorist organisation that is very dangerous and yet also doesn't exist. Tell me, vaL, why do you think the Church of Scientology automatically characterises its enemies thus without any kind of evidence? Why don't they want you listening to us?
@vaLLarrr You wouldn't know if I "do nothing but blabber," because Scientology "confront" is designed to rile the opponent up while ensuring that the Scientologist doesn't think too hard about what their opponent is saying. The cult doesn't like you thinking too hard, because you know what you are to them? A source of income and cheap labour. A slave, to be kept controlled and insulated from reality. That's why you're spending Christmas defending the cult again.
@vaLLarrr And there you go, focusing on a totally peripheral point. You know I've hit a nerve. You know I'm right - the Church of Scientology doesn't want you thinking too hard about what critics actually say. Which is odd, because if we really are all liars, it wouldn't matter if you heard what we said. Got to wonder what they don't want you hearing.
@vaLLarrr Parroting - I was wondering when we'd see that! Now, there's another of those "maximum wordage, minimal thought" techniques that cults use to prevent their members from having to deal with critics head-on. Come on, vaL, surely you're smart enough to figure out that the Church of Scientology is playing you for a schmuck.
@vaLLarrr Okay, and you can continue to do the same. The difference is, you're harming yourself in the long run by doing so. Do you think you're the first Scientologist to be confronted with the sad reality of the cult? Of course not. That's why so many people leave.
@vaLLarrr Yeah, that doesn't make you sound the least bit angry or embittered. Maybe you should consider leaving the cult. It's clearly not doing you any good.
@vaLLarrr You certainly sound angry and embittered. And frankly a little hysterical with that "complete psycho" remark. Has Scientology done you any good at all?
@vaLLarrr I'm just saying, you sound angry and embittered. You write in the style of a person who is angry and embittered. I don't understand why you find this so difficult to understand.
@vaLLarrr Did I say it was anything other than an opinion? I did not. But have you never wondered why, despite your incredible "tech," you have convinced literally no one of the merits of Scientology? It's because you sound angry, spiteful, bitter and generally like someone who got screwed over by a cult and only wants other people to join so they can suffer with you.
@vaLLarrr I'm not clear what point you're trying to make. Are you saying the Nazis' opinion vis-a-vis Judaism is more valid than mine vis-a-vis you sounding angry?
@vaLLarrr It's not clear to me because it's an over-dramatic comparison. You need to get a sense of proportion and, perhaps, a more realistic sense of your own importance.
not at all. it's not clear to you because you're an idiot. if there was anyone here who was not a stupid troll like yourself, I could prove that easily.
@vaLLarrr This from someone who thinks a person calling them angry is comparable to the Holocaust. I'm guessing you came from a pretty privileged background, right? Found the real world a bit tough to handle? And that's what drew you to the Cult of Scientology. It's full of entitled whitebreads like yourself and gave you a place to feel superior despite your lack of skills and qualifications. It's all coming clear now.
@vaLLarrr vaL, every time anyone says anything that upsets you, it's always, "gee, good thing like the NAZIS something THE JEWS." You really need to grow up.
digs, if you had any intelligence whatsoever (which you don't of course), you would realize there's nothing wrong with drawing comparisons with the Nazis when it's appropriate.
even Godwin says that.
naturally, you will never understand this because your IQ simply isn't high enough, so don't worry about it.
@vaLLarrr You think "saying you sound angry when you don't think you do" is an appropriate point of comparison with the Nazis? You're a bit self-important, aren't you?
gee digs, it's really not my fault that you're too stupid to understand that I wasn't comparing what you said to what the Nazis said at all, but rather that your opinion is just as "valid" as THEIRS, REGARDLESS of what is actually said.
again, you are too stupid to have understood that, so don't worry about it.
gee digs, it's really not my fault that you're too stupid to understand that I wasn't comparing what you said to what the Nazis said at all, but rather that your opinion is just as "valid" as THEIRS, REGARDLESS of what is actually said.
again, you are too stupid to have understood that, so don't worry about it.
You make about as much sense as a Nazi $cientologist; of which there are less and less of as the internet (Hubbard's & Miscavige's Waterloo), Anonymous & the media exposure of your cult roll forward.
"I'm a criminal gangster murderer neo-Nazi psychopath rapist who is a member of a worldwide terrorist organisation that is very dangerous and yet also doesn't exist."
ROFLMAO!!!
One of *many* examples of $CIENTOLOGY's Newspeak and Doublethink *Blackwhite*
"So where do you suggest I go to find the definition of "enturbulate?"
Well, in a *Church of $cientology approved* "technical" dictionary - but of course.
Where else but "Source?"
They didn't call him the Commodeodor [Commodore] for nothing, yanno?! ;D
On a 'more' serious side note, I find it hilarious that Ron titled himself "the Commodore," [below Rear Admiral] and David Miscavige -not long ago- promoted himself to Admiral.
Bunch of NUTS who are scared of QUESTIONS. These freaks are just like the Holocaust bullshit artists who are scared of questions and investigations so they lock people in prison for questioning their bullshit stories.
Technically speaking, we are 'afraid' of something. A mindless exploitative cult that uses violence and coercion, is only infectious to really stupid people who happen to not be protected by their peers or guardians, and that was formed by a shithouse pulp SF/Crime writer and petty criminal who WAS, POSSIBLY, the greatest Con Man of the 20th Century (next to Andy Warhol, but he just annoyed people instead of destroying their lives).
'status of this guy' - god they are such, utter, utter morons. 'inturbulating'. shoot them all, just shoot them all. they are thugs too, it reflects how stupid scientologists really are
First of Those 3 people asking him What are you Afraid of, Why are you Afraid of Hubbard, What are your Crimes.
If i ask them this.. Why are you are so conspicuous about L. Ron Hubbard, Why are so defensive about your Church? if you have nothing to hide about Your Church you would invite that person No matter what. Camera or no Camera. Maybe those 3 Nut Jobs are Embarrass about they're Church,
Wow! Those people are scary!! They need to put this guy down?? Just because he is filming them? Then they invite the same people in to the 'church'??? Nuts.
@vallarta looks like the 3 guys are almost to the second stage of truth. Thanks for pointing that out for us. I think the guy in the middle is OT VI! Makes sense = ] "Can I get some thumbs up for not being drain of my life by a cult!" hail xenu Hah!
I don't understand how someone becomes a Scientologist. How do you not just do 1 minute of research on the net, and run away from this cult as fast as you can?
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a women with lust you have committed adultery with her in your heart.
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Does this concern you? The Bible teaches despise the value of your eye compared to the value of your soul. would u sell your eye for a million dollars? And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. needgod.com
you know what I would wish that the church brainwash a cartels leader son or even better his only daughter not to speak white here family or they kidnap her & put here in to forced labor, would be fun to see whats going to happen to mr miscavige
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!
holy shit, these people can vote.
gmet 3 days ago
You are afraid of people becoming more aware and more free! Now turn off that camera and walk away!
No one finds that funny?
CvijaFaQ 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This video is popular on Sanaa
gordoncraig410 4 days ago
These people are fucking crazy.
monkeyman0011 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jdtrickster4
yea oh you mean YOU CLAIM there are "hundreds of thousands."
claim |klām|
verb [ reporting verb ]
state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.
ROFLMAO
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@jdtrickster4
gee, good thing it's not 25,000 ex Sea Org members and you're a liar.
you know, as usual?
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
How many, then, if not 25,000?
And there are HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS, if not MILLIONS of EX-scientologists, who are now OUT.
Of course, most of those were simply "first-time-book-buyers," did a basic course and/or introductory lecture. And after that they ran in thge opposite direction from the cult; THEY RAN LIKE HELL FROM THE REGGES. ;D
They *solved* that "over-regging" problem Miscavige knows nothing of or is powerless to stop. ROFLMAO
jdtrickster4 1 week ago
@jdtrickster4
* the not thge :)
cat must've gotten vaL's tongue...
cat's name is David Miscavige.
jdtrickster4 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr @sharkattacksteve
/watch?v=Oj-w09kpQcY
"Scientology: James Randi on L. Ron Hubbard "
jdtrickster4 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jdtrickster4
oh right. James Randi says, "I've seen it, it's crap."
wow.
what a convincing "argument."
of course it's better than any YOU post.
*rollseyes*
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@jdtrickster4 Thanks JD. I just recently found out that Randi is gay after 35 years of following his career and research. That must explain why he's such a S.P to the inhabitants of the Magic Kingdom.
sharkattacksteve 1 week ago
@sharkattacksteve
Wow, Randi is 1.1 [one-point-one]. That's below 2.0 on the remotional tone scale.
And he rejects both Scientology and Hubbard. He shall have to be disposed of quietly and without sorrow. ;-)
jdtrickster4 6 days ago
@jdtrickster4
yea, sure they are tricky.
whateva you say.
*yawn*
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
25,000 EX-Sea Org members can't be wrong, vaLdi. ;D
jdtrickster4 1 week ago
All people who believe there is some crazy person sitting in the couds, wearing special underwear, watching everything we all do......are crazy! Crazy friggin losers!
shanas0628 2 weeks ago
@shanas0628
What, are you saying he's standing there *in the buff???*
jdtrickster4 2 weeks ago
@jdtrickster4
oh right. one's "confidence is engaged."
the fact they these people actually almost IMMEDIATELY SEE FOR THEMSELVES that Scientology ACTUALLY WORKS has NOTHING to do with anything, right tricky?
RIIIIIIGHT. LOL
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
Well, vaLLy, actually, "these people" are now OUT of $cientology !! ;D
But yeah, confidence; as in CON or "Confidence game."
See now?
I'm sure you do. Hopefully you do, that is.
And I hope you soon get the help you need.
1-866-XSEAORG
jdtrickster4 2 weeks ago
Deadspace. Their scientologists are batshit insane.
bladiumdragon 2 weeks ago
David Miscarriage of justice and the Church of Shysterology
MrCuntyballs2U 2 weeks ago
Can a real scientologist explain to me how you buy in to this idiocy. How does it not even enter into your mind that Hubbard was a scifi writer and that maybe just maybe he made all if this silly shit up. I mean the whole premise if your religion is is like a science fiction movie... A bad one. I'm just curious because I am awfully tempted in targeting the idiots of this world for their money as Lron did. I mean if I don't someone else will.
MrR1D3R 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrR1D3R
what a ridiculous "point."
of course, you are too much of an idiot to understand that Hubbard couldn't "make up" the fact that Scientology ACTUALLY WORKS.
naturally, THAT would never occur to someone like you, would it.
DUH
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@MrR1D3R
One word for you: "Bait-and-switch."
Another could be "Ponzi scheme."
Also, remember, the overwhelming majority of "scientologists" don't know what you do about Xenu and the dead-space-aliens or much of the "sci-fi space-opera."
It sort of comes across as a self-help pop-psychology, at first; which reminds me THIS is part of the CON or "Confidence game." One's confidence or trust is engaged and encouraged (fomented) while one's critical thinking is compromised & shut down.
jdtrickster4 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jdtrickster4
you mean this Lisa McPherson?
"Lisa Macpherson was not held against her will and was in fact happy to be there. I find all those charges false and hereby dismissed" - Judge Quesada, Clearwater judge June 23, 2001
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
they all have the same eyes as tom cruise
razmoe2000 3 weeks ago
Has $cientology made a dent on its "Aims" of creating a world without criminality, insanity & war?
Not according to Reed Slatkin [now serving a 14 yr sentence for FRAUD] & most definitely not according to "Reverend" Rex Fowler, an OT8 [$cientology's highest available *awareness level* (The ones above it have not been "released" yet] who's now a convicted murderer doing life in prison
Davie Miscavige should be in prison for his participation in killing Lisa McPherson, among others. Won't be long.
jdtrickster4 3 weeks ago
robots
guzsaj 3 weeks ago
I admit it. I totally enturbulate to pictures of Eliza Dushku.
AceSkepTik 3 weeks ago
$cientology and Dianetics are the sciences of the mind.........
...of the mind control, that is. And *brainwashing*
It is about money, greed, control and power. And it'll use any means necessary to "remove any counter-intention" to its efforts or ends. And yes, they DO justify the means::
Google *Scientology Controversies.* Or "Scientology," period.
The truth is out now. The cat's out of the proverbial bag - Thanx to the internet: $cientology's Waterloo.
jdtrickster4 3 weeks ago
@jdtrickster4
And "Anonymous" is General Wellington. ;D
Just an analogy. :)
jdtrickster4 3 weeks ago
This is hilarious!
ZgtPe3PP3eRzzz 3 weeks ago
477 people are Scientologists
splooged 4 weeks ago
Psychos!!!!
PaulRubino 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
These people are crazy!!
NORMANGODS 1 month ago
2:38 I didn't know The Toolman was a Scientologist.
UnitedDiscord 1 month ago
Dan, over a million people have seen you Scientology fail. Do you see how after all this time that you are still pulling it in for your cult?
Redrider425 1 month ago in playlist More videos from Valarauko
Dan, over a million people have seen you fail! Congratulations on pulling it in for Scientology.
Redrider425 1 month ago in playlist More videos from Valarauko
Wow! Some of my comments have been removed. Im starting to wonder just who is running this show. So Im done here. Its funny that the Scientology freaks can say what they wish, yet Im sure this will be removed also. I can't help if Im not wanted. Bye!
deeponeslive 1 month ago
Notice the stormtrooper boots that cop at the beginning of the video was wearing.
tchaser5858 1 month ago in playlist Crazy Religious People
What a bunch of wackos.
TerrySleeper 1 month ago
Scientology is a cunt
sameer137 1 month ago
I know that they kill. We know some they have killed. I would like to know were the trench is that the cult puts the bodies of those we never see on the videos anymore. Where is Miscaviges' wife, and so many others? What are your crimes Scientology? Where Are your children? Xenu returns June 23rd. Are you ready?
deeponeslive 1 month ago
Comment removed
deeponeslive 1 month ago
"did u take time off from beating your wife to come down here." Well at least it's a religion and not a comedy club.
mattparfett 1 month ago
Id like to know if any of these fine fellows are still with us, or have they disappeared as scientologist tend to do.
deeponeslive 1 month ago in playlist Tom Cruise Crazy-gate
roflmao! INTERBULATE is not even a word used by anyone but Scientology. roflmao! INTERBULATE is not even a word used by anyone but Scientology.
roflmao! INTERBULATE is not even a word used by anyone but Scientology. roflmao!
parasitesarefunny 1 month ago
@parasitesarefunny
oh you mean the way the word PROTON was not used by anyone but PHYSICISTS for the first decades after it was created?
geez, are you stupid. roflmao
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Difference is, "proton" is a useful word describing a concept for which there was no pre-existing term. "Enturbulate" was just a word L. Ron invented because he didn't know the word "agitate."
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
gee, too bad for you that you're too ignorant to know that there was no pre existing word for "enturbulate" EITHER, since it DOESN'T simply mean "agitate."
but that's ok, you REVEL in your ignorance, dont'cha digs. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
Comment removed
Digscomics 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr So go on, vaL, enlighten us. What is the unique meaning of the word "enturbulate?"
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh feel free to do the research on what "enturbulate" means yourself digs.
don't let the fact that you're far too stupid to understand it get in your way.
y'know?
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr You see, vaL, when you say things like that, as opposed to posting someone else's quote and gloating, that's how I know that you've been stumped. You've been told there's something unique about the word "enturbulate," but damned if you can work out what it is.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
gee, too bad for you I'm not stumped at all, and I happen to know for a fact that there is something totally unique about the world enturbulate.
the fact that I choose not to bother defining for a troll like yourself is your problem.
find out yourself.
or not. who cares.
now if someone who was NOT a troll came along right NOW, and asked the same question, I'd be happy to explain it to him or her.
which shows you up as completely wrong as usual, and an idiot to boot.
y'know?
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr How does it show me up as wrong? I said there was nothing unique about the word "enturbulate." You have failed to demonstrate otherwise. All you have shown is that your "confront" sucks balls.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh, I didn't say it "showed you up" as wrong.
of course, you didn't show that you're right either.
I just happen to know that you're wrong, knowing the definition of enturbulate as I do.
unlike you of course.
just as I don't have to demonstrate that quantum mechanics works.
find out yourself.
or not. suit yourself.
and you're the one who sucks balls, remember?
LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Let me Google "define enturbulate." Let's see what result we get...
"Not a real word. Invented and used by Scientologists.as if it was, normally providing humorous results."
Ah, so that's the difference between "enturbulate" and "agitate." I stand corrected, hail Xenu!
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
gee, digs. did you close your eyes, light incense and chant, "EVERYTHING on Google is TRUUUUUEEEE......." when you did that?
LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr So where do you suggest I go to find the definition of "enturbulate?"
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh start reading all the Scientology books in chronological order the way I did.
it's in there.
or not.
suit yourself.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr I don't think I'll be going to all that trouble. Unlike you, I have a life. Anyway, if the derivation of the word is what matters, I already know that. Hubbard pulled it out of his ass.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
suit yourself.
but then don't complain that you don't know the meaning of enturbulate.
and I shudder to think what you pull out of your own ass digs.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@Digscomics
your comment is as stupid as someone who says they're not going to go to all the trouble of finding out what "gravity" is, and will just stick with the "dictionary definition."
gravity |ˈgravitē|
noun
1 Physics the force that attracts a body toward the center of the earth.
that would make them as stupid as you are digs.
see now?
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr So when you say Scientology counts as a science because it fits the dictionary definition, you are in fact talking crap.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
not at all of course. it IS one definition of science.
just as "agitate" is ONE definition of "enturbulate."
but not the only one of course.
so.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Well, here's how it goes, vaL. I've looked in several glossaries, pro-, anti- and neutral towards Scientology. I've even looked on Scientology's official website. None of them suggest "enturbulate" means anything more than "upset" or "agitate." The only person suggesting it has any other meaning is you. Why should I believe you?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh you shouldn't believe me.
I wouldn't.
you should find out yourself.
but of course you "can't be bothered."
so live in ignorance.
no MY problem.
YOUR problem.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Because it would be a wild goose chase. Hundreds of pounds and countless hours to find this new definition of "enturbulation." If this definition really exists, I don't see why you couldn't just post it. All the evidence suggests that you're lying.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
yea, that's as "valid" as someone who wants to know what "gravity" is in 25 words or less, because they "can't be bothered" to find out what it actually is.
and when you tell them to read the papers on General Relativity, they tell you that would be a "wild goose chase."
RIIIIIIGHT.
nice try though digs.
and anyone who is "convinced" by your "logic" belongs on your side digs.
what's the problem. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr But if I look into gravity, I can instantly see that there's more to it than a simple dictionary definition. Yet I look into "enturbulated," I see absolutely no reason to believe it means anything other than "agitated," other than the word of one sci-troll who is so shifty that s/he won't even say hir sex, age or nationality. Why waste my time?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh, if you "look into it?"
just what does "mean" digs?
hmn?
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Conduct basic research, vaL. Cast a beady eye over what's there. But I sense you're trying to stray from the point, so you and I will demonstrate my point here and now with the following question and your response.
Is the word "enturbulate" anything more than a synonym for "agitate" or "upset?"
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
gee, that's what I meant digs.
conduct some "basic research" into what "enturbulate" means.
glad we're on the same page there.
and yes it is "synonymous."
that's as good as saying that "gravity" is "synonymous" with the "force of gravity."
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Right. So where one uses the word "enturbulate," one might equally use the word "agitate."
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
sure. depends on the context.
you could just as easily say "what goes up must come down because of the force of gravity."
of course, that doesn't really tell you what gravity IS.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr So one can only fully understand the term if one has read quite a few Scientology texts?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh, I wouldn't call four or five books "quite a few."
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Whatever. Four, five, quite a few, whatever. My question is this - why use it to non-Scientologists, as the guys in the video above do? And I'd be interested to hear how you phrase your reply here.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
because just because it started out as a Scientology technical word, there's no "rule" that says it cannot now become part of the vernacular as well.
so??
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr But these guys are acting like it's already part of the vernacular. And I can tell you exactly why they are.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
and why is that in your opinion?
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr It's more than just my opinion. It's a standard technique used by politicians, cults, armed forces and anyone else who seeks to influence the way people think. When you change the way people speak and use vocabulary, you create mental blocks with regard to their expression. It's a form of brainwashing. Very L. Ron Hubbard.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
nonsense.
people try to influence the way people think all the time all over the world.
the Palestinians refer to themselves as if there ever was a country called "Palestine," which there never was of course.
the United States recognized Taiwan as "China" until Carter recognized the People's Republic.
physicists refer to the "God particle" among THEMSELVES as if it has something to do with god, and now it's a common term.
guess all those physicists are "brainwashed," huh.
ludicrous.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr The physicists are genuinely describing things for which there are no words, and politicians are indeed trying to influence the way people think. That's why they're so fond of slogans and buzzwords. In a closed environment like a cult, of course, it also serves to create insularity from the outside world. Hence the fact that so many cults like to use alternative vocabulary.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
nonsense. there is absolutely no need for physicists to describe the "god particle" as such at all.
guess that means they use it because physics is such a closed environment and is a "cult," huh digs.
ridiculous.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@Digscomics
and I guess when sailors refer to a wall as a "bulkhead," and a floor as the "deck" and a ceiling as an "overhead," it's because they're trying to "influence the way people think," and the navy is a "sinister cult," right digs?
how ludicrous.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@Digscomics
not to mention "port" for "left" and "starboard" for "right," etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc ....a real sinister "alternate vocabulary," right digs?
*rollseyes*
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Sorry for the delay in replying, my social calendar is kinda busy at this time of year. Well, the armed forces do like their recruits obedient and unthinking, so yes, that is appropriate.
Have you never wondered why you have that list of copypasta to reply to people with? It's so you can reply with minimal thought. And there's less risk of you having the thoughts the Church of Scientology doesn't want you to have.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh that's ok digs, I didn't even notice.
and of course Admirals who also call a wall a bulkhead etc are all "obedient and unthinking."
RIIIIIIIGHT
nice try digs.
and of course I "copy pasted" that, right?
as if your idiotic trolling deserves any more than that in any case.
LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Quite a lot of that reply there was copy-pasted. Keep thought to a minimum, right? You wouldn't want to end up as a "Potential Trouble Source," now, would you? Isn't it interesting that despite Scientology's incredibly powerful "tech," it's considered damaging for you to even talk to "Suppressives." Why do you think that is, vaL?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
sure it was digs.
and you think Adolf Hitler was the Messiah.
so?
which is worse.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr And there's another technique to prevent you thinking too hard about criticisms of Scientology. "Attack the attacker." Make wild (and again copy-pasted) allegations against the person making the criticism rather than actually addressing the criticism head-on and again, being forced to think. You're making real progress.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh right digs. only YOU can make wild allegations against someone that they're using inappropriately using "copy pasta" when they're NOT, and then demand that THEY prove they're not NOT doing that, when YOU haven't proved that they ARE.
which of course means that YOU are the one not addressing the criticism head on because you simply BRUSH IT OFF as "copy pasta" when it ISN'T.
RIIIIIGHT.
how convenient for you.
I wish I could say you're making any progress whatsoever.
DUH
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Also, why do you think the Church of Scientology doesn't want you talking to "Suppressives?" I mean, surely if Scientology "tech" was so powerful, it wouldn't matter who you spoke to?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
and just because the tech is so powerful somehow "means" that's it's a good idea to talk to psychos.
RIIIIIGHT.
yea that makes about as much "sense" as everything else you say digs.
*rollseyes*
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr I'm not demanding that you prove anything, vaL. But because you're not paying attention (because that would involve thinking, which the CoS doesn't want you to do), you don't realise that you're actually proving my point without any effort at all from either of us. Also, labelling all enemies of the CoS (or "Suppressives")as "psychos?" That's another thought-blocking technique. So what's your plan for Christmas? YouTube again?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
digs, anyone who who is too stupid not to realize that you simply blather and assert things as if they're "true," and never back up a damn thing you say belongs on your side anyway.
what's the problem.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr I don't need to back anything up, because you're doing it for me. Everything you say is a perfect demonstration of cult thought-blocking techniques. Copypasta? Check. Attack the attacker? Check. Insults? Check. Do yourself a favour and ask: why would the "benevolent" Church of Scientology discourage independent thought? What don't they want you thinking about? What conclusions are they afraid you'll reach?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
complete nonsense as usual.
as if dozens of people from Sun Tzu to George Washington et al DIDN'T say the best defense is a good offense.
etc etc.
you're so laughably ignorant it's actually hilarious.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr You're comparing you being a dick on YouTube to the military strategy of Sun Tzu? Because that's another typical cult technique - convince members that what they're doing is of greater importance to the world than it is. Because "outsiders" don't see the tremendous importance, it makes it easy for you to dismiss them. So you don't have to listen to them. And don't have to think. Because the CoS doesn't want you doing that.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh no. I'm comparing YOU being a dick to all the rest of the neo Nazis here.
so?
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Someone's not in the festive spirit this year... vaL, according to you I'm a criminal gangster murderer neo-Nazi psychopath rapist who is a member of a worldwide terrorist organisation that is very dangerous and yet also doesn't exist. Tell me, vaL, why do you think the Church of Scientology automatically characterises its enemies thus without any kind of evidence? Why don't they want you listening to us?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
nah.
you're simply a lying neo nazi bigot and a liar.
you haven't murdered or raped anyone to my knowledge.
unless you're now confessing to it?
it wouldn't surprise me of course.
and just what terrorist organization are you saying I'm claiming you're a member of digs?
btw, why do you do nothing but blather digs?
is it because you're afraid of the truth?
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr You wouldn't know if I "do nothing but blabber," because Scientology "confront" is designed to rile the opponent up while ensuring that the Scientologist doesn't think too hard about what their opponent is saying. The cult doesn't like you thinking too hard, because you know what you are to them? A source of income and cheap labour. A slave, to be kept controlled and insulated from reality. That's why you're spending Christmas defending the cult again.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
yea too bad for you I said blather.
I would suggest you learn to read sometimes if I didn't already know that was futile. LOL
so why DO you do nothing but post absurd blather digs?
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr And there you go, focusing on a totally peripheral point. You know I've hit a nerve. You know I'm right - the Church of Scientology doesn't want you thinking too hard about what critics actually say. Which is odd, because if we really are all liars, it wouldn't matter if you heard what we said. Got to wonder what they don't want you hearing.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
there you go, claiming that something is "peripheral" in order to evade it as usual.
so why DO you post nothing but irrelevant blather and refuse to back it up?
you know I'm right digs. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@Digscomics
desperately trying to evade the truth by calling it a "peripheral point" as usual, huh digs.
looks like I hit a nerve. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Parroting - I was wondering when we'd see that! Now, there's another of those "maximum wordage, minimal thought" techniques that cults use to prevent their members from having to deal with critics head-on. Come on, vaL, surely you're smart enough to figure out that the Church of Scientology is playing you for a schmuck.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
sure digs.
continue to evade the truth and let everyone see you do that.
much obliged.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Okay, and you can continue to do the same. The difference is, you're harming yourself in the long run by doing so. Do you think you're the first Scientologist to be confronted with the sad reality of the cult? Of course not. That's why so many people leave.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
Okay, and of course you can continue to claim, in lieu of actually backing it up as usual, that I'm doing the "same" when I'm not digs.
claim |klām|
verb
state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.
as long as you continue let everyone see you do that.
that's the whole point, after all.
and naturally, anyone who is "convinced" by your "logic" BELONGS on your side digs.
I have absolutely no problem with that either. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Just so long as they don't wind up as unhappy as you, vaL.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
sure digs. whateva you say.
now say something else stupid.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Yeah, that doesn't make you sound the least bit angry or embittered. Maybe you should consider leaving the cult. It's clearly not doing you any good.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
OH sure. I'm "angry and embittered" because the complete psycho says so.
what a brilliant "argument" as usual. LOL
now say something else stupid digs.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr You certainly sound angry and embittered. And frankly a little hysterical with that "complete psycho" remark. Has Scientology done you any good at all?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
there ya go digs, blathering your idiotic opinion as if it was an actual "fact" as usual.
it's really obliging of you to expose yourself as not being able to tell the difference.
typical.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr I'm just saying, you sound angry and embittered. You write in the style of a person who is angry and embittered. I don't understand why you find this so difficult to understand.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh you mean you are blathering YOUR OPINION that I sound that way.
thank you for exposing that anons don't know the difference between opinion and fact.
just like the Nazis "proved" that Jews are vermin, right digs?
makes everything you say so "credible."
LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Did I say it was anything other than an opinion? I did not. But have you never wondered why, despite your incredible "tech," you have convinced literally no one of the merits of Scientology? It's because you sound angry, spiteful, bitter and generally like someone who got screwed over by a cult and only wants other people to join so they can suffer with you.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
you mean like the Nazis' opinion that Jews are vermin?
gee, digs. just as if anyone cares about your opinion.
LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr No, it's not remotely like that opinion. I don't understand how you could even think that was an appropriate comparison.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
and just WHY is that not remotely like that opinion?
why is YOUR opinion more "valid" than theirs?
opinion |əˈpinyən|
noun
a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
hmn digs?
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr I'm not clear what point you're trying to make. Are you saying the Nazis' opinion vis-a-vis Judaism is more valid than mine vis-a-vis you sounding angry?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
of course it's not clear to you. it's WAY over your head, as usual digs.
don't worry about it, it's not for your benefit in any case.
it's for anyone with actual INTELLIGENCE reading this.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr It's not clear to me because it's an over-dramatic comparison. You need to get a sense of proportion and, perhaps, a more realistic sense of your own importance.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
not at all. it's not clear to you because you're an idiot. if there was anyone here who was not a stupid troll like yourself, I could prove that easily.
but like I said, don't worry about it. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr This from someone who thinks a person calling them angry is comparable to the Holocaust. I'm guessing you came from a pretty privileged background, right? Found the real world a bit tough to handle? And that's what drew you to the Cult of Scientology. It's full of entitled whitebreads like yourself and gave you a place to feel superior despite your lack of skills and qualifications. It's all coming clear now.
Digscomics 1 month ago 2
@Digscomics
gee too bad for you that you're too stupid to see that I wasn't comparing anything to the "Holocaust."
don't worry though, anyone with actual "intelligence" sees that digs.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr vaL, every time anyone says anything that upsets you, it's always, "gee, good thing like the NAZIS something THE JEWS." You really need to grow up.
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
digs, if you had any intelligence whatsoever (which you don't of course), you would realize there's nothing wrong with drawing comparisons with the Nazis when it's appropriate.
even Godwin says that.
naturally, you will never understand this because your IQ simply isn't high enough, so don't worry about it.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr You think "saying you sound angry when you don't think you do" is an appropriate point of comparison with the Nazis? You're a bit self-important, aren't you?
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
gee digs, it's really not my fault that you're too stupid to understand that I wasn't comparing what you said to what the Nazis said at all, but rather that your opinion is just as "valid" as THEIRS, REGARDLESS of what is actually said.
again, you are too stupid to have understood that, so don't worry about it.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Digscomics
gee digs, it's really not my fault that you're too stupid to understand that I wasn't comparing what you said to what the Nazis said at all, but rather that your opinion is just as "valid" as THEIRS, REGARDLESS of what is actually said.
again, you are too stupid to have understood that, so don't worry about it.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr
You make about as much sense as a Nazi $cientologist; of which there are less and less of as the internet (Hubbard's & Miscavige's Waterloo), Anonymous & the media exposure of your cult roll forward.
Happy New Year!
1-866-XSEAORG
jdtrickster4 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr
"is it because you're afraid of the truth?"
You wouldn't know the truth if it hit you in the face.
jdtrickster4 1 month ago
@Digscomics
"I'm a criminal gangster murderer neo-Nazi psychopath rapist who is a member of a worldwide terrorist organisation that is very dangerous and yet also doesn't exist."
ROFLMAO!!!
One of *many* examples of $CIENTOLOGY's Newspeak and Doublethink *Blackwhite*
[See *Blackwhite* in Wikipedia]
jdtrickster4 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr
licked, once again, by Digscomics.
$cientology IS a $cam.
- 27 yr EX-member
jdtrickster4 1 month ago
@Digscomics
*that* "mean," that is.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Digscomics
"So where do you suggest I go to find the definition of "enturbulate?"
Well, in a *Church of $cientology approved* "technical" dictionary - but of course.
Where else but "Source?"
They didn't call him the Commodeodor [Commodore] for nothing, yanno?! ;D
On a 'more' serious side note, I find it hilarious that Ron titled himself "the Commodore," [below Rear Admiral] and David Miscavige -not long ago- promoted himself to Admiral.
jdtrickster4 1 month ago
@vaLLarrr Ah, here we go, according to Allwords, it means "to agitate or disturb; to upset, harass."
So it does, in fact, mean exactly the same as "agitate."
Digscomics 1 month ago
@Digscomics
oh it's the derivation of the word that matters.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@Digscomics
of course, "agitate" or "disturb" is ONE definition, completely out of context as usual.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
Bunch of NUTS who are scared of QUESTIONS. These freaks are just like the Holocaust bullshit artists who are scared of questions and investigations so they lock people in prison for questioning their bullshit stories.
parasitesarefunny 1 month ago
And GO MARK. You are a ROCK sir!
jonship 1 month ago
Technically speaking, we are 'afraid' of something. A mindless exploitative cult that uses violence and coercion, is only infectious to really stupid people who happen to not be protected by their peers or guardians, and that was formed by a shithouse pulp SF/Crime writer and petty criminal who WAS, POSSIBLY, the greatest Con Man of the 20th Century (next to Andy Warhol, but he just annoyed people instead of destroying their lives).
jonship 1 month ago
'status of this guy' - god they are such, utter, utter morons. 'inturbulating'. shoot them all, just shoot them all. they are thugs too, it reflects how stupid scientologists really are
jonship 1 month ago
Just don't park on the street. -_-
Mikraken23 1 month ago in playlist Oddities: Scientology
First of Those 3 people asking him What are you Afraid of, Why are you Afraid of Hubbard, What are your Crimes.
If i ask them this.. Why are you are so conspicuous about L. Ron Hubbard, Why are so defensive about your Church? if you have nothing to hide about Your Church you would invite that person No matter what. Camera or no Camera. Maybe those 3 Nut Jobs are Embarrass about they're Church,
We are Legion
We Do Not Forgive
We Do Not Forget
Expect us
MrPyuckYiu 1 month ago in playlist More videos from Valarauko
Wow! Those people are scary!! They need to put this guy down?? Just because he is filming them? Then they invite the same people in to the 'church'??? Nuts.
deweypug 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@deweypug
gee, too bad you're too stupid to realize that he came there to HARASS them, not simply to "film them."
DUH
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@vallarta looks like the 3 guys are almost to the second stage of truth. Thanks for pointing that out for us. I think the guy in the middle is OT VI! Makes sense = ] "Can I get some thumbs up for not being drain of my life by a cult!" hail xenu Hah!
n0bleOg 1 month ago
"Scientology offers total freedom. We offer total freedom here."
However, get off that public street and don't film them or anything around them. They don't like THAT kind of freedom.
jimmyshand 1 month ago
That second guy's upclose face disturbs me more than the vid itself
AnonymousKR3 1 month ago
Too close for comfort?
AnonymousKR3 1 month ago
Do they ever make any sence? be nice if they answerd a question aswell instead of constantly turning everything around on him
FCUKCHEATERS 1 month ago
Scientology makes you act like the guys in this video.
Digscomics 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Digscomics
"Scientology makes you act like the guys in this video."
Yeah, like well indoctrinated, brainwashed cult zombies. ;)
Oh, and with a streak of fascism
jdtrickster4 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
$cientology is potentially dangerous, harmful, abusive and criminal.
It should be obvious when all $cientology wants is YOUR MONEY.
jdtrickster4 1 month ago
I don't understand how someone becomes a Scientologist. How do you not just do 1 minute of research on the net, and run away from this cult as fast as you can?
Learningbyhearing 1 month ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
@Learningbyhearing
you don't understand how someone becomes a Scientologist because you've never actually done it, and you're ignorant.
duh
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
@Learningbyhearing Want to know the foundations of scientology? Watch South Park. :)
Mikraken23 1 month ago in playlist Oddities: Scientology 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@Mikraken23
is that like the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" tells you the foundation of Judaism?
vaLLarrr 1 month ago
u fukin manson wanna bees
KiamDiamond 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Are you ready?
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a women with lust you have committed adultery with her in your heart.
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Does this concern you? The Bible teaches despise the value of your eye compared to the value of your soul. would u sell your eye for a million dollars? And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish. needgod.com
standingontruth1 1 month ago in playlist Scientology
This has been flagged as spam show
you know what I would wish that the church brainwash a cartels leader son or even better his only daughter not to speak white here family or they kidnap her & put here in to forced labor, would be fun to see whats going to happen to mr miscavige
WatchmenDrManhattan 1 month ago
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!
peopledick 1 month ago
@peopledick you are as retarded as these nutcases
SaulTBawlz 1 month ago