If anyone is interested in listening to a preacher and isn't interested in facts, then this is the video for you. I would also recommend videos on creationism or the faith healing of peter popoff.
However if you want to learn about the future of physics, this is one to avoid. Check out Michio Kaku, Brian Cox or Karl Sagan. Also google "nassim haramein fraud" to hear what physicists have to say - the critical thinking minds amoung you should be curious as to why ALL physicists call him a fraud.
@ Starsandfunk This guy is right... You'd have to be a physicist to think that he is wrong. This man is an eternalist. People who think that the universe is a box, need to get their head straight. (Or a balloon for that matter (pun intented :P))
@kroese1870 i also watched a video on homeopathy yesterday - it was much easier to understand than modern medicine so it must be right and all Doctors must be wrong ...
@Starsandfunk (Ignoring the sarcasm) Ah! So you agree! :D Doctors are not only wrong, they get payed to be wrong! How can a man ask someone else, what is wrong with his body!? Doesn't anyone hold to the ages old; "KNOW THYSELF" anymore?
@kroese1870 if you like Haramein you'll love the videos of Kent Hovind. He also has a groundbreaking theory that the earth was just 'created' just 6,000 years ago! I mean, wow, it all makes sense!! Hovind, like Haramein, has many loyal followers and due to the brilliance of his theory doesn't even need evidence to back it up. Of course those 'close minded' scientists try and disprove him with their dogmatic views on fossil records, evolution, etc. - but pfftt, what do they know!!
@Starsandfunk Have you seen the entire thing or just the 1/45 part.
Those scientists you speak off, are calculating with things they come up with out of the blue. "Strong Force" "Dark Matter" and as of yet 'we' (because I studied physics) are not even addressing the problem of torque in space, we put the observer on the rotating object so that we don't have to figure out where the force comes from that rotates a planet.
I know what I am talking about and Nassim Haramein does a damn good job!
@kroese1870 ??? I thought you were being sarcastic - are you serious??
So let me get this straight: You say you've studied physics and yet you state that "we put the observer on the rotating object so that we don't have to figure out where the force comes from that rotates a planet" ...?? What??? You ought to make a complaint to your college that Planet Formation and Conservation of Angular Momentum was somehow omitted from your physics course.
@kroese1870 ... and did you really mean to say that scientists came up with the Strong Force and Dark Matter out of the blue??? You do realise that the Strong Nuclear Force has been observed and measured within particle colliders. Where on earth did you study physics - bible camp?
@Starsandfunk LOL! the strong force and dark matter did not come from supercollider experiments. They predicted that something like that would come out. AND IT DIDN'T!
They could't account for 83%!!! of the mass of the universe so they come up with the dark matter theory. Watch Nassim Harameins calculations, they all stand strong.
theresonanceproject(dot)org/research/scientific here are all the calculations he won multiple awards for in 'normal' physics.
@kroese1870 just google 'CERN measurement of Strong Force' - and consider yourself debunked. Again.
But i'm not going to let you off that easily. In the same paragraph in your previous comment you claimed to have studied physics but made two claims that demonstrate you are scientifically illiterate. You are telling lots of little porkie pies whilst fraudulently claiming to have studied physics. And that kroese, puts you in very good company with Haramein.
@Starsandfunk My friend, measuring a force does not explain where it comes from. I can measure a magnetic field but that doesn't mean I can built a electro magnet, and Yes, I am in very good company with Haramein. The theory of the strong force and dark matter are not wrong, but they explain nothing. It's kinda like saying God created the universe without knowing what 'God' is.
You are not going to sway from your believes so I'll leave it at that, okay?
@kroese1870 so still dodging the fact that I proved you are a fraud. Explain why you made the completely stupid statement "we put the observer on the rotating object so that we don't have to figure out where the force comes from that rotates a planet". Of course a real physicist knows this rotation arises from planetary formation and Conservation of Angular Momentum. You can 'make stuff up' in Harameins world, but in the scientific world, you have to be able to explain yourself.
I don't see how any logical person can hate on Nassim. Even if you ignore a lot of what he talks about and only look at how he added torque and Coriolis effect to Einstein's Field Equations, it works! It works amazingly! Do it with logic in you're head or with math... it works! Just think about it. I also know that we have been struggling to understand how light has both properties of waves and particles. He clears that up using a toy! SERIOUSLY! Nassim WILL have a Nobel Peace Prize!
@Arcknagar LOL. He must surely be on course for a Nobel Prize - you have to ignore the fact that every scientist with a shred of creditibility knows he is full of crap. What you need to look at is the judgement of youtubers without any scientific knowledge at all - once they have watched a couple of Haramein videos they can see so much more than a qualified Physicist. I once watched an episode of Casualty, and now i know more about medicine than most qualified Doctors!
I came to think of something. The reason you guys think of the universe as having limits is because you think its like a machine (not being alive). That foundation changes how you look at everything. :)
@Uberware You obviously struggle with reading too because my point below LHS demonstrates exactly why science IS open minded. There's no need for you to feel threatened by the scientific method that has brought you air travel, medicine, the internet, space exploration, etc. - scientists are not trying to undermine you. Put your ego to one side, open your mind and you'll begin to understand that humanity are working together as one to harness the secrets of the universe.
Sounds so beatiful. I wish it were true.... human kind working together to harness the secrets of the universe...:) I like the way you phrased it. Thanks for that. Now, lets agree to disagree or we will do this forever. =)
@Uberware i agreed to disagree with you from the start. The same reason i agree to disagree with young earth creationists, islamic fundamentalists, etc. They too have decided upon the truth they want and so refuse to open their minds any further. I'm not interested in attempting to change the way you think - i'm simply debunking your arguments in a public forum.
Yes I do like Nassims science - its awesome. :) Of course things can travel faster than the speed of light... why wouldnt they? Stuff like that is why mainstream science is so ridiculous. I can go inside and ask myself "would the universe limit itself to a certain speed" and get a large "of course not dummy!" back. The foundations of science are wrong, thats why you come up with ridiculous conclusions. I think there is lots of ego in science today... :)
Nassim Haramein 'prestigious' award for one of his physics papers is actually just an award for a best paper presented at a computing conference. It nowhere near being a peer review physics award.
There are 10s of 1,000s of Physicists in the world who are doing far better research and making greater strides. If anyone wants to see a real physicist in action, look up Michio Kaku or Brian Cox.
Don't get sucked in by the long hair, cheesy grin and 'cool' demeanor.
@Starsandfunk: As I tend the likes of Kaku and Cox and Tegmark it seems to me that they to will shed a tear when they get thru the math on this. If these are true then I think these bright fellows will be the first on board. While you might've got sucked in by the hair, smile and "cool" demeanor you missed the fact that not 1 of his points have not been refuted!! Listen to the facts and don't let the looks distract you. If can pay attention then u2 can get on the wagon now and not later.
@acesjeff the problem is that there are no facts in what harramein says - he's a fraud who delivers simple but meaningless analogies. His appeal is similar to that of a religious preacher - he offers an explanation that is easier to grasp than science but unfortunately has no grounding in facts or reality. If you lap this up then that's your choice - it's not up to me to explain to you why you are deluding yourself.
Everything are created by unconsciousness mind and so the universe. So be aware of our intention. That was Budda teach us three thousand years ago. We are all affected by the nature law which is cause by the conditional causation. (cause and affect) . All things created under the conditional causation and have a boundry. To leave out from the boundry. You must need to fully understand the law of nature how to run. A Mi Ta Fu!
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
Maybe if people would stop regarding science as an egotistical race to the answer and instead collaborate and pool knowledge with more frequency, maybe we'd be far better off. Standing in ivory towers and calling someone with new ideas a "cook" is not really conducive to scientific discovery and evolution of concepts towards the greater good. I'm certain I've just instigated a flurry of pending ego driven self-validating responses.... standing by... :)
@jackkedrabbit I agree - if people stopped seeing science as some 'egotistical' race to an 'answer' from safe 'ivory' towers, they might realise that scientists are far more open-minded than they think. Take the faster-than-light neutrino issue. Potentially, it has the power to overturn, or re-write, many sacred cows of physics. But scientists are excited, giddy and falling over each other to test the results. That's not hiding from new research or ideas, nor attempting to censor them.
@steeltable218 that's definitely the way to be. perhaps it's more the stranglehold the private sector has on research that's arresting innovation. I think scientists have a responsibility to share research and move us forward as a species.
Why is the scientific community so dogmatic. Nassim is exploring the universe beyond the fixed boundaries of your rigid institutions. You people should remeber that Newton was rejected by the scientic community of his time. Newton spoke of seeing gravity long before he was able to prove it's existence to the rigid Dons of his time. Some of the most qualified academics are also the people with the least amount of common sense. Optics would be a unknown field without Newton. Nassim stay strong.
I have learned so much from your videos. To increase knowledge is the key to growth. You have helped me to appreciate the true value of chemistry, biology and physics.
A different subject now; I want everybody to know about the disgusting things going on in England between humans and animal.
Please watch this video;
"Many people in Britain are sleeping with dogs! Get me out if England!
@Arcknagar I am glad that I was able to make you smile. Scientists often forget how to laugh. Clean up your language and I might just keep you laughing with my videos for years. You can see the logic of Nassim's theories. Your mind is clearly awake; it has removed the boundaries of scientific dogma. Great stuff!
I watched his "Black Whole" DVD and he said that he didn't agree with his teacher saying that non-existant two dimensional things could turn into three dimensional things if two dimensional things don't exist. But 2D doesn't exist in the 3D realm and you can confirm this by trying to touch a picture. Try to feel the curves of a ball just by feeling a picture. But other things that he says are interesting! :D
Unfortunately it seems to me that the non-scientist acolytes only adds to the problems surrounding him. Alluding to vague conspiracies doesn't help to clarify or justify anything. The "peer review process" has proven itself to be a good system for ensuring good science is done - science is successful. Examples of bad science slipping through the process are low in number. It is a distributed system, there is no "central control" and the media play no part in the review process.
@astraltraveler420 You do not need faith or trust in a teacher/speaker - you use the basic laws of physics and known constants, e.g. Newton’s Law of universal gravitation, Gravitation Constant G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N m2 kg-2, mass of the Earth = 6.0 x 10^24 kg, radius of the Earth = 6.4 x 10^6 m, etc so long as you can substitute values in this is not difficult - it's basic maths. Show me anywhere where NH works through any new physics using numbers and derives or predicts anything. He never does.
@lemonhead1961 If you can drop a brick, weight it, measure a distance, time it's fall and use F=ma and F=G.m1.m2/R^2 - you can do the maths yourself to make an estimate of the mass of the earth.
@TheMushshroom Moreover, what does it tell u about Haramein when he blatantly lies about comet NEAT in this lecture, and totally misrepresents quantum mechanics (e.g we don't care about causes)? Why would a true scientist have to lie and misrepresent the facts like that? I think it shows he knows how gullible & scientifically ignorant his audience is, and therefore he can get away with any old bollocks as long as he presents it in a manner pleasing to them
@TheMushshroom I, along with others, challenge the claims made. Why do u see a problem with that? They can do what i've done, and watch Haramein's tedious lecture, but isn't it funny that when Haramein groupies ARE challenged on the facts, they either fail to respond, or do so in such a way as to show they have no understanding of even basic science, e.g the claim that a Hollow Earth is thought of as 'likely' by scientists? What does that tell you about them?
@astraltraveler420 How do i know? Oh, just the fact that S and P waves from earthquakes travel THROUGH the Earth (as i already mentioned, if u bothered to read my comments). Oh, and a little thing called GRAVITY, which can be directly measured. Maybe you've heard of it? Imagine how little of it the Earth would have if it was hollow!
@TwistedQuills and don't come at me Calling me a loser or fag I want ur honest answer don't get hostile or nothin cuz hostility shows that ur not open minded and don't Argue that cuz I know a bunch of ppl who over react when ever u try to bring up a point that contradicts what they believe
@TwistedQuills ok so u don't support Nassime theory's so stop trolling and go watch a physics video u like. And plus how do u know that the earth Isnt hollow how do u personally know that everything that comes out of a academic is truth, how do u know that you aren't being fed a bunch of bullshit hmm get back at me
The use of "semi-classical physics" - a quote from his so called "paper", was not justified, it was inappropriate physics - relativistic physics should have been used.
I am not aware that he is proposing any theory - theories have to produce testable predictions and be accepted by the wider community. What phenomena does he describe using quantifiable data? The words "sacred geometry" for instance, mean absolutely nothing - it's just geometry. I think most physicists see the beauty in many things but beauty isn't an intrisic or meaningful property of anything - it's a human "quality" which means nothing in or to the laws of physics.
It's great that so many people are enthused by his entertaining meanderings BUT I'd hope it would motivate listeners to learn some real physics for themselves, not hero worship NH - read a good, simple but entertaining book on some branch of physics like Chad Orzel's "How to Teach Quantum Physics to Your Dog"
@lemonhead1961 You should probably watch all 45 videos on his theory before you draw conclusions, I mean that's real science isn't it, get all the data and THEN draw conclusions. By the way what is the "Force" behind the mechanics of the universe?
@cambell1308 A characteristically facile response apparently showing no understanding of the distinction between a "literature review" and "practical physics". Real world physicists will use "citation databases" to look for peer reviewed articles published in respected journals (of which there are many) - NH does not show up in these & consequently his "work" is not recognised inspite of claims to have "worked in the field" for many years. e.g. library upenn edu / scitech / mpa /
@lemonhead1961 Probably because all "peer reviewed articles published in respected journals" translates to is controlled by mass media. Wake up buddy. Why do you think all kinds of respected peer reviewed published scientists are currently trying to rewrite Nassim's theory with names very close to his Unified Filed Theory? Because the guy is so right it isnt even funny. Read his Schwatrzchild Proton Theory paper and then talk.
@cambell1308 The forces at work depend on the scale. I worked for 20+ years post-graduate with mass spectrometer development, particle accelerators, cancer research and at a national laboratory on fundamental measurements besides many other things.
@cambell1308 There is no force, it's all an illusion - energy is an illusion - it is just a product of consciousness, as is the whole universe and the observer as well.
@mikedans55 OK so there is no force ? hmm , really so we all live in a stagnate universe and you are quoting "physics"? does not the word "physics" apply by it's very nature to something physical? Physics is the study of the physical universe as we know it. I think that your thought stream leads more towards the "meta" physical (meta meaning after, beyond or adjacent) to the physical rather than the physical or "Physics"
@TheBobathon Yup, that guy is pretty representative of a typical Haramein groupie, judging by the sorts of responses they've posted here and other places. Lmao
@TwistedQuills Yeah? Tell me more? What kind of person did you expect to find on a Nassim Haramein video? Atleast I can admire that "groupie" for pursuing what he enjoys.
You, on the other hand, seem to find delight bashing another persons thoughts- patrolling peoples image of this person to think similar to your own- without giving them a fair chance to base THEIR opinion on the information he presents. Your actions and condescending tone tell me more about you than the "facts" that you tell
Dudes, you don't need to watch eight hours of this - you can see Haramein's entire argument presented at watch?v=GnzoxSEiW88 in less than five minutes :-)
@DontTreadOnMe476 And please, do enlighten us poor peasants on how Einstein thought that Relativity was wrong (a theory that no experiment has contradicted, btw). Go ahead, i'm all ears/eyes!
@lightworker2011 Done any research on earthquakes yet? Or are you, like other Haramein supporters, gonna just ignore inconvenient facts that totally undermine Harameins silly assertions? I mean, honestly, what sort of physicist claims the Earth is hollow?! For crying out loud, if that doesn't send up huge red flags in your head, what the fuck will?
@lightworker2011 Solid core reflects nothing? False. Why not try doing, oh maybe 5 WHOLE MINUTES of research on earthquakes, particularly S and P waves, and get back to me?
As for holes at the poles, that comment just shows what a deluded science illiterate you are, and how you can't even apply a little common sense to your claims. North Pole is covered in water. How does this water not flush down into the hole u claim is there? Use your head for more than a hatstand!
@truthseeker010101 Is that cancer paper you referred to available online? I'd like to have a look. Just so you know, the Maharishi school is hardly the most respectable institution, as their laughable 'experiment' attempting to show the power of TM meditation to lower crime rates in Washington DC shows.
@DontTreadOnMe476 And please, do enlighten us poor peasants on how Einstein thought that Relativity was wrong (a theory that no experiment has contradicted, btw). Go ahead, i'm all ears/eyes!
@lightworker2011 YES, earthquakes, or rather the waves generated by them, travel through the core of the Earth. The P waves do anyway, the S waves are reflected by the solid core. That's how we know the core is solid. How could any machanical waves travel through if the Earth was hollow? You see, just 1 more example of Haramein's unscientific nonsense, that none of his new-age audience, or you either it seems, were able to spot.
@TwistedQuills gosh no.. scientists claim that the Earth rings like a bell when there is an Earthquake, and this so called solid core reflects nothing.. in fact scientists say that it's because of the molten lava that it doesn't go through, but the same can be said if the Earth is hollow.. it doesn't really matter what you say, you can see the holes leading in to the planets on any planet, if you do just a tad of research, and they are always near the planet's axis. NASA brushes Earth's out.
I've noticed that patten. Whenever those who like/agree/accept Haramein's speil are asked a specific question, about, you know, PHYSICS, the can NEVER answer. Hmmm....
@TwistedQuills Good question. Can you tell me how radio waves travel through space? it means nothing whether I know how.. but the earth still has a thick crust, and lava beneath, that never changed.. it just means it's more hollow than what they once believed.. do you presume that Earthquakes travel THROUGH the core of the earth? I predict that the center is more stable.. it's kind of like the earth used to be flat, and then.. it was round. Now.. it is a living organism with a center.
And please, do enlighten us poor peasants on how Einstein thought that Relativity was wrong (a theory that no experiment has contradicted, btw). Go ahead, i'm all ears/eyes!
@DontTreadOnMe476 Wrong for 60yrs? So predicting the W and Z bosons was an error? Calculating the magnetic moment of an electron, to agreement with experiment of 9 or more decimal places, is an error? Or the period reduction of a pair of pulsars to equal or greater accuracy? That's an error too? Want me to go on with my list of successes for modern physics, or is that enough to show your wrongness?
@lightworker2011 "At least it's closer than theories like quantum physics and the big bang, and string theory.. they're all shots in the dark using nothing but math.." You think Quantum Mechanics and the Big Bang theory don't have any observational evidence to support them? Shows how much you know about modern physic, i.e little or nothing. Pfft
@TwistedQuills You act as if modern science has the answers already. You are the problem with modern physics. You cling to a model that is clearly wrong and has been for 60+ years. You even mock anything different, god forbid someone hypothesize anything different than your model. There are so many flaws with the scientific model that it is no where near completion. Einstein even knew and admitted that relativity wasn't correct. How can you judge someone when YOU know so very little.
@TwistedQuills shots in the dark as in, assuming that logic alone holds the answers.. nevertheless, the world needs logic AND spiritual awareness.. it is through a wholesome awareness that humans will integrate spiritual evolution as a whole.. the realm of physics is strongly in the polarity of logic.. incomplete. whether you like it or not, they have to combine.. the science world draws people in that are in the polarity mind, but they will have to wake up and find their heart center
I don't think science accepts his theory because science has ignored some things. Science is a polarized mechanism, defining the universe using logic, when the only way to understand an esoteric universe is through full awareness and experience, and paying attention to sacred geometry. His theories may not be exact, At least it's closer than theories like quantum physics and the big bang, and string theory.. they're all shots in the dark using nothing but math.. which one's more ridiculous?
@lightworker2011 Science ignores his theories because they don't work, and his predictions don't tally with observations and measurements in nature. What is an 'esoteric universe' btw? And why can't logic be a valid part of 'full awareness and experience'? Are formal logic and experience mutually exclusive?
@steeltable218 you're wrong.. he has small math problems with his work, but the sacred geometry part is correct, as is the more elegant aspects of his theory. But, he didn't really come up with the theory originally himself.. he just brought stuff together and is trying to invite it to physics, perhaps not a realistic thing to do. Esoteric means spiritual, which is the universe we live in. His predictions do so tally with observations in nature, with the sacred geometry, which he didnt invent
@truthseeker010101 Well I don't go by 'theories'. I follow the highest emotion. Knowing is not the same as believing.. science believes, it is the same as religion. This is why scientists are not able to know, they can only believe in what they say and that is 2-dimensional thinking.. we are 3-dimensional human beings integrating the 4th.. knowing comes from the heart center, not the brain.
@lightworker2011 You go by your theories or models of the world every day. Otherwise you couldn't function in ti. Models inform every action, perception, reaction and emotion. I suppose because Haramein evokes a high emotion of positivity within you, then he must be correct? Do you believe that only things that do this are true? Science proceeds from doubt or scepticism. You proceed from certainty. Which is more humble? Oh, and this logician loves the Gita too.
@steeltable218 No, high emotion is not a theory or a model, its a product of full awareness, and it comes not from the brain of logic.. your heart center is not your brain, it is also not a metaphor. It is your HEART CENTER and I mean it literally, the electromagnetic energy of your chest is greater than any other place in your body. The first thing formed in a fetus is the heart and out of that comes the tongue, and in chi gong they use this to ground the heart to the brain. ta da..
@lightworker2011 God planted the seed inside us. look withen to find truth. Ask God, or ask a Guru/Mystic. You seem like your on your way to becoming a Guru. : )
@truthseeker010101 hah, well thank you, but then anyone can be a guru if they are centered in their heart, the true center of consciousness. BTW, another cure for cancer; maple syrup and baking soda (a brand without aluminum in it).. cook it for 5 minutes, don't let it burn, have 3 teaspoons a day.. cancer loves sugar, the sugar goes right to the cancer and the baking soda is pure alkaline, cancer cant handle it.. in conjunction with vegan diet, cancer will regress, or disappear. Ta da!
@lightworker2011 I dont like to eat meat. I might eat meat if it was treated well, and raised naturally. I see a lot of pain and suffering when I visit the local store for food. 200,000,000 male chicklets are grinded each year at birth. : (
@truthseeker010101 well yeah there are many kinds of sugars, but it's synthetic sugar that's not good for ya.. honey and maple syrup are fine, good even. And yeah, I don't like how animals are slaughtered either.. not one bit. When you eat animals you eat their fear energy.. keeps you in a lower awareness..
@lightworker2011 That only follows if everything Haramein says is accurate and truthful. For the most part, it's neither. He says the Earth is hollow, for crying out loud!
@TwistedQuills "He says the Earth is hollow, for crying out loud!" yeah, and so did Hitler, and how many high ranking officials in governments during the second world war. It wasn't an invention of Haramein's, this goes back quiite a ways.. and it isn't scoffed at by science either, because it is likely.
Respond to this video... no I haven't studied it. I have only one teacher and it brings me all answers I could need. All one needs is the heart center!
@lightworker2011 it tells you all you need to know, it doesnt lead to you to read history, you just know? Then you need to tell me something I don't know. I know the spirit guides and can tell us all the secrets. If you are a Mystic then teach me your hidden knowledge.
there's a misunderstanding.. I am here on youtube aren't I? what I meant was, I don't subscribe to a particular teaching, though im familiar with some.. I meant, the existence brings me what i need to know, I don't have to try so hard to find info here on the web.. without the internet, we would not be going through these changes and evolving nearly as quickly. Sorry for the misunderstanding, but I guess I could have just said no, Ive never read it. :P
If there are just 2 types of energy, 'expansive and contractive', and physicists have ignored the latter, explain Newton's and Einstein's gravitatioal theories. Surely gravity is 'contractive', if anything is
Btw, REAL physicists don't talk about 'nasty infinity'. You're operating under the mistaken assumption that Haramein tells the truth. He doesn't. Same goes for that guff about 'the 1st rule of quantum physics is we don't care about causation', which is a blatant lie
Is it any wonder that the physics community ignores him? They don't even care about what he says enough to refute him. He may as well not exist, as far as physicists are concerned. Maybe he'd get a reaction if he tried to persuade the Texas Schoolboard to include his ideas in their physics textbooks? Lol
@lightworker2011 Actually, i DID watch most of it (didn't bother much with the ancient history part). I know enough physics to see right through this guy. He predicts NOTHING, he explains NOTHING, makes up meanings for words as it suits him, and makes claims that are VERIFIABLY WRONG
He throws around so many buzzwords in ways that make no sense. That little motor with the string? He claims the pattern it shows is a fractal? No it isn't! It's either a standing wave, or a travelling wave messily interfering with itself. Black Hole at the centre of a hollow Earth? Gimme a break! Cells as singularities? How can anyone take such statements seriously? Obviously his audience don't have a clue what the words mean
Well done to Bobathon for putting the effort into shredding this fraud's ridiculous claims. It's a pity more new-age adherents don't read some REAL science, so they wouldn't be taken in by deceiving wankers like Haramein (but i suppose if they did, they wouldn't be part of the new-age 'scene' for very long)
@TwistedQuills Yeah, Bob's done a great job with this prat. I like the basic motivations of New Agers; ecological values, harmonious living, the embrace of nature, exploring new perceptions etc. It's a pity they seem to want to throw out their brains at the same time. I can't see how the pursuit of elevated consciousness is helped by cluttering the mind with pap. Stepping to enlightenment means keeping our feet on the ground...
@steeltable218 You won't have a place to put your feet when we radiate ourselves to death. There are 2 kinds of energy, expansion and contraction, and science has dealt primarily with expansion energy which is radiation energy. Physics has literally ignored contraction energy, using words like "NASTY INFINITY", because it got in the way of their formulas, so they normalize this problem and continue.. CONTRACTION energy is the forces of creation which we can tap in to, and have CLEAN ENERGY!
How can anyone take this guy seriously? Even people with only secondary school physics, or just an interest in reading/watching popular science physics books/documentaries, should be able to see right through this charlatan in 5 minutes flat!
If you hear quacking do not be surprised. It's coming from Nassim Haramein. This guy is a total fraud. His work is unscientific, mystic mumbo jumbo. Go read the blogs from other scientists actually working in the field of relativity, quantum mechanics, gravitation, etc.. none of his calculations are accurate and all his arguments are fallacious. This IS NOT SCIENCE! It's mysticism+spiritualism with a psuedo-science topping.
@lightworker2011 The same sad non-argument levelled at 'establishment science'... Despite what you may think, scientists aren't afraid of change. Or of changing themselves and their beliefs in light of new evidence. If it were so, there would be no progress, there'd just be stasis. Any scientists that LEGITIMATELY overturned established theories would get into the history books. Scientists are prudent in accepting ideas that have no evidence to support them. Like Haramein's.
@steeltable218 How about the 1957 Physics Nobel peace prize winners who found the source charge problem. If science had accepted that, then all the modern text books need to be thrown out and rewritten.
@DontTreadOnMe476 "And please, do enlighten us poor peasants on how Einstein thought that Relativity was wrong (a theory that no experiment has contradicted, btw). Go ahead, i'm all ears/eyes!
TwistedQuills 1 day ago "
TwistedQuills had a question for you, he didn't press reply but it was direct toward you. : ) Guess he wanted others to think he was right but did not want you to actually answer, you'll find a lot of egos like this.
@truthseeker010101 I rather think he simply forgot to press the right button and just commented instead of replied. It's so odd that the so-called 'spiritually aware' seem to want to find hidden motives and agendas in everything and everyone. TwistedQuills has nothing to fear from DontTread's acumen.
@steeltable218 I am not deluded in my thinking to assume human beings have ego! if you are stuck in insults in hate thats you stuck on the lower path. I hope you get out of it somehow. Jesus helps!
@truthseeker010101 Please quote where I insulted or condemned you. If there's a problem here, I think it's that you see (and read) what you want to see. Of course humans have 'ego' (which has several definitions), I never implied we don't. I'm certainly not a hateful person, despite what you choose to see.
@DontTreadOnMe476 Well, Lester Pearson actually won the 1957 Nobel Peace Prize for establishing an international police force to resolve the 1956 Suez Crisis. Wang and Lee won the 1957 Nobel in Physics for finding a violation of the 'absolute' and fundamental parity laws regarding two particles, not a source charge problem. This wasn't ignored by science. The main proponent of the 'source charge problem' is Tom Bearden, a well-known basket case even in free-energy circles.
@steeltable218 That is not true at all, thats all they can do to keep people from listening, attack his creditability. Your own words reinforce my beliefs even more.
@DontTreadOnMe476 On Tom Bearden, as he has much in common with Haramein... he's a self-styled expert on over-unity physics. He's achieved his status not by professional peer-reviewed publications, attending major mainstream conferences, or creating real-world demonstrations, but by playing to the fringe net-crowd through substantial publicity. What's made his rise possible is absence of critical evaluation of his theories, as he always keeps away from the qualified.
@DontTreadOnMe476 Tom Bearden has admitted to a fake PhD; some undemonstrated claims are: a unified field theory (yawn); a cure for cancer; revealed the 'fundamental secret' of over-unity; the 'final secret' of free energy; how to 'deactivate' radioactive materials; has 'proven' the fundamentals of EM theory are wrong; found a physical mechanism for reincarnation and deserves 'more than a Nobel Prize'.
@steeltable218 Why do you need a piece of paper to say whether or not you can be listened to. The whole peer reviewed process is bull. I worked for a guy that could fully charge 7 batteries off of one of the same batteries. I watched it with my own eyes. I cannot expect you to grasp reality and realize what a farce modern science is. Free energy is real and easily verifiable, your taught to believe you cannot create something out of "nothing" from day one.
@DontTreadOnMe476 Well, a research PhD from a reputable university is more than just a 'piece of paper'. Why do you find the peer-review process 'bull'? It's just there to check the scientific, methodological and mathematical integrity of a paper, a kind of quality control. It's not there to test findings. I'm open to over-unity energy if it exists, but if it's real and easy as you say, why don't free-energy guys just power their houses with it and invite a few local engineers over?
@steeltable218 Well if you looked at what has happened to many of the others that have come out with there inventions. I would learn to shut up about it and keep it to myself. The guy that had the generator was very nervous about showing it and was not too fast to give information out. He uses it to power his car, he hasn't paid for gas for years. As far as his house im not sure.
@DontTreadOnMe476 If I'd found a source of free energy that was legitimate and demonstrably irrefutable, I'd hide in plain sight. Simultaneously contact scientists, engineers, local press (to feed to the nationals); tv news; and build a visible internet presence; get a PR company on board. I'd be completely safe in the open. Hiding a world-changing discovery because of the fear of a 'mysterious death' is cowardice and selfishness. I'd surely put the world's needs before my own, wouldn't you?
@steeltable218 You think its as easy as that. Yep just get all of these people to jump on board. The press is controlled by the same people who control oil. Oil is a multi trillion dollar industry, The largest industry in the world next to banking. So no matter what people you have standing next to you at all times and how open you are about it, it will not matter. Look up the car that was ran off of water, he went to the press and tried to patent it.
@DontTreadOnMe476 Yes, it is as easy as that. If you disseminate the information and your discovery widely, then it's utterly pointless to kill you, isn't it? You can still keep the patent and cream off the top. By 'the press', you men every single paper and media organisation on the globe? All owned by the oil industry? Or are we talking shadowy groups here? It's very easy to opt out through irrational fear rather than doing something with your life, isn't it? Who was the car guy? Name, please.
@steeltable218 THC has cured cancer for a long time, notice how when we made cannabis illegal and stopped the true Chrsim of Christians the Christians have become ignorant of thier own teaching, dying of cancer, and diesese. I have a 12 page PEER REVIEWED by real accredited Ph. D.s at Iowa State and Maharishi University. I wonder if you have it in you to learn, to listen to instruction. Smoking cannabis does some things but the real cure is found in the oil. Read the paper? or conceed
OK... If this is all true, PLEASE explain to me why he hasn't won the Nobel Prize in Physics? (because with this discovery, he most certainly WOULD win.
Is it:
a) because his ideas don't pass the rigors of the scientific method
OR
b) because the (entire) scientific community and the government is trying to keep him quiet
OR
c) because he'd rather sell DVD's on his website and NOT win this prestigious award and contribute to to science
@cptstubing I understand your criticism but you are wrong in giving so much value to the Nobel prize. The nobel prize or any other prize for that matter is not a metric of truth. Its just a psychological exploitation where scientists get pitted against one another for superficial glory. Those who maintain the arbitrary monetary economic system doesn't want individuals to reflect on their knowledge. They'd rather see us invest our energy on base egotistical pursuits.
@agent0sephiroth I do also agree with what you are saying. However I must emphasize that a discovery such as this would almost certainly get the attention of all humanity. If what he is proposing is true, it would be the discovery of all discoveries. I think this physicist is simply trying to become popular. He can't back up anything he claims.
It is though typically the crazy scientists who make outlandish claims that end up being correct (think Kepler, Copernicus, Brahe, Galilei, Newton)
@OmtaThien Yes politics is a lot of it.. but when the science isn't embraced because the math or logic doesn't make sense, or there is too much speculation and not enough hard evidence collected from rigorous experimentation and testing, then it isn't science. It is pseudoscience, which this guy seems to be producing.
that is true. For the case of quantum science though I think scientists are turned off by it because the finding did not support the ideal or the bias. it is surprising how far they go to negate new findings when it actually contradicts the idea of scientific determinism.
@OmtaThien RIght, when new science contradicts old science, it is easy to resist the new stuff, but not always. As it should be, great claims need great evidence. You can't say you were abducted by aliens without very good evidence. New ideas are often not met with open minds though, you are right.
harameins theories - calculations and research is incredible...
KUNGFUNINJAFISH 6 days ago
If anyone is interested in listening to a preacher and isn't interested in facts, then this is the video for you. I would also recommend videos on creationism or the faith healing of peter popoff.
However if you want to learn about the future of physics, this is one to avoid. Check out Michio Kaku, Brian Cox or Karl Sagan. Also google "nassim haramein fraud" to hear what physicists have to say - the critical thinking minds amoung you should be curious as to why ALL physicists call him a fraud.
Starsandfunk 1 week ago
everyone should google "What's so misleading about Nassim Haramein?". I too got sucked in. Too many assumptions.
cr0uchingtiger 3 weeks ago
@ Starsandfunk This guy is right... You'd have to be a physicist to think that he is wrong. This man is an eternalist. People who think that the universe is a box, need to get their head straight. (Or a balloon for that matter (pun intented :P))
kroese1870 3 weeks ago
@kroese1870 i also watched a video on homeopathy yesterday - it was much easier to understand than modern medicine so it must be right and all Doctors must be wrong ...
Starsandfunk 2 weeks ago
@Starsandfunk (Ignoring the sarcasm) Ah! So you agree! :D Doctors are not only wrong, they get payed to be wrong! How can a man ask someone else, what is wrong with his body!? Doesn't anyone hold to the ages old; "KNOW THYSELF" anymore?
I cry for humankind.
(ps. No I don't go to doctors; I meditate)
kroese1870 2 weeks ago
@kroese1870 if you like Haramein you'll love the videos of Kent Hovind. He also has a groundbreaking theory that the earth was just 'created' just 6,000 years ago! I mean, wow, it all makes sense!! Hovind, like Haramein, has many loyal followers and due to the brilliance of his theory doesn't even need evidence to back it up. Of course those 'close minded' scientists try and disprove him with their dogmatic views on fossil records, evolution, etc. - but pfftt, what do they know!!
Starsandfunk 2 weeks ago
@Starsandfunk Have you seen the entire thing or just the 1/45 part.
Those scientists you speak off, are calculating with things they come up with out of the blue. "Strong Force" "Dark Matter" and as of yet 'we' (because I studied physics) are not even addressing the problem of torque in space, we put the observer on the rotating object so that we don't have to figure out where the force comes from that rotates a planet.
I know what I am talking about and Nassim Haramein does a damn good job!
kroese1870 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kroese1870 ??? I thought you were being sarcastic - are you serious??
So let me get this straight: You say you've studied physics and yet you state that "we put the observer on the rotating object so that we don't have to figure out where the force comes from that rotates a planet" ...?? What??? You ought to make a complaint to your college that Planet Formation and Conservation of Angular Momentum was somehow omitted from your physics course.
Starsandfunk 2 weeks ago
@kroese1870 ... and did you really mean to say that scientists came up with the Strong Force and Dark Matter out of the blue??? You do realise that the Strong Nuclear Force has been observed and measured within particle colliders. Where on earth did you study physics - bible camp?
Starsandfunk 2 weeks ago
@Starsandfunk LOL! the strong force and dark matter did not come from supercollider experiments. They predicted that something like that would come out. AND IT DIDN'T!
They could't account for 83%!!! of the mass of the universe so they come up with the dark matter theory. Watch Nassim Harameins calculations, they all stand strong.
theresonanceproject(dot)org/research/scientific here are all the calculations he won multiple awards for in 'normal' physics.
ps. yes I read the bible, it was fun
kroese1870 2 weeks ago
@kroese1870 just google 'CERN measurement of Strong Force' - and consider yourself debunked. Again.
But i'm not going to let you off that easily. In the same paragraph in your previous comment you claimed to have studied physics but made two claims that demonstrate you are scientifically illiterate. You are telling lots of little porkie pies whilst fraudulently claiming to have studied physics. And that kroese, puts you in very good company with Haramein.
Starsandfunk 2 weeks ago
@Starsandfunk My friend, measuring a force does not explain where it comes from. I can measure a magnetic field but that doesn't mean I can built a electro magnet, and Yes, I am in very good company with Haramein. The theory of the strong force and dark matter are not wrong, but they explain nothing. It's kinda like saying God created the universe without knowing what 'God' is.
You are not going to sway from your believes so I'll leave it at that, okay?
"It's about personal experience" - Buddha
kroese1870 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kroese1870 so still dodging the fact that I proved you are a fraud. Explain why you made the completely stupid statement "we put the observer on the rotating object so that we don't have to figure out where the force comes from that rotates a planet". Of course a real physicist knows this rotation arises from planetary formation and Conservation of Angular Momentum. You can 'make stuff up' in Harameins world, but in the scientific world, you have to be able to explain yourself.
Starsandfunk 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
VAMOS A VER. SI PONEIS EN GOOGLE
Nassim Haramein la mentira está ahí fuera
vereis varios articulitos donde desmontan fácilmente las teorías de este charlatan.
Lo siento por aquellos que se lo creer, a mí también ma cautivó al principio
Juandiegodiverso 1 month ago in playlist Nassim Haramein - The Unified Field Theory
I don't see how any logical person can hate on Nassim. Even if you ignore a lot of what he talks about and only look at how he added torque and Coriolis effect to Einstein's Field Equations, it works! It works amazingly! Do it with logic in you're head or with math... it works! Just think about it. I also know that we have been struggling to understand how light has both properties of waves and particles. He clears that up using a toy! SERIOUSLY! Nassim WILL have a Nobel Peace Prize!
Arcknagar 2 months ago
@Arcknagar LOL. He must surely be on course for a Nobel Prize - you have to ignore the fact that every scientist with a shred of creditibility knows he is full of crap. What you need to look at is the judgement of youtubers without any scientific knowledge at all - once they have watched a couple of Haramein videos they can see so much more than a qualified Physicist. I once watched an episode of Casualty, and now i know more about medicine than most qualified Doctors!
Starsandfunk 1 month ago
I came to think of something. The reason you guys think of the universe as having limits is because you think its like a machine (not being alive). That foundation changes how you look at everything. :)
Uberware 2 months ago
@Uberware You obviously struggle with reading too because my point below LHS demonstrates exactly why science IS open minded. There's no need for you to feel threatened by the scientific method that has brought you air travel, medicine, the internet, space exploration, etc. - scientists are not trying to undermine you. Put your ego to one side, open your mind and you'll begin to understand that humanity are working together as one to harness the secrets of the universe.
Starsandfunk 2 months ago
Sounds so beatiful. I wish it were true.... human kind working together to harness the secrets of the universe...:) I like the way you phrased it. Thanks for that. Now, lets agree to disagree or we will do this forever. =)
Uberware 2 months ago
@Uberware i agreed to disagree with you from the start. The same reason i agree to disagree with young earth creationists, islamic fundamentalists, etc. They too have decided upon the truth they want and so refuse to open their minds any further. I'm not interested in attempting to change the way you think - i'm simply debunking your arguments in a public forum.
Starsandfunk 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes I do like Nassims science - its awesome. :) Of course things can travel faster than the speed of light... why wouldnt they? Stuff like that is why mainstream science is so ridiculous. I can go inside and ask myself "would the universe limit itself to a certain speed" and get a large "of course not dummy!" back. The foundations of science are wrong, thats why you come up with ridiculous conclusions. I think there is lots of ego in science today... :)
Uberware 2 months ago
Comment removed
Uberware 2 months ago
Nassim Haramein 'prestigious' award for one of his physics papers is actually just an award for a best paper presented at a computing conference. It nowhere near being a peer review physics award.
There are 10s of 1,000s of Physicists in the world who are doing far better research and making greater strides. If anyone wants to see a real physicist in action, look up Michio Kaku or Brian Cox.
Don't get sucked in by the long hair, cheesy grin and 'cool' demeanor.
Starsandfunk 2 months ago
Comment removed
Uberware 2 months ago
@Starsandfunk: As I tend the likes of Kaku and Cox and Tegmark it seems to me that they to will shed a tear when they get thru the math on this. If these are true then I think these bright fellows will be the first on board. While you might've got sucked in by the hair, smile and "cool" demeanor you missed the fact that not 1 of his points have not been refuted!! Listen to the facts and don't let the looks distract you. If can pay attention then u2 can get on the wagon now and not later.
acesjeff 1 month ago
@acesjeff the problem is that there are no facts in what harramein says - he's a fraud who delivers simple but meaningless analogies. His appeal is similar to that of a religious preacher - he offers an explanation that is easier to grasp than science but unfortunately has no grounding in facts or reality. If you lap this up then that's your choice - it's not up to me to explain to you why you are deluding yourself.
Starsandfunk 1 month ago
@Starsandfunk uh...ok.......nice 1.
acesjeff 1 month ago
@acesjeff you're welcome
Starsandfunk 1 month ago
Cult
antmayfield 2 months ago
Now this is a video I will look forward to anytime and its so simple for me at least :). Everyone is different.
KSATica 2 months ago
Everything are created by unconsciousness mind and so the universe. So be aware of our intention. That was Budda teach us three thousand years ago. We are all affected by the nature law which is cause by the conditional causation. (cause and affect) . All things created under the conditional causation and have a boundry. To leave out from the boundry. You must need to fully understand the law of nature how to run. A Mi Ta Fu!
kamsmelon1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
peopledick 3 months ago
Maybe if people would stop regarding science as an egotistical race to the answer and instead collaborate and pool knowledge with more frequency, maybe we'd be far better off. Standing in ivory towers and calling someone with new ideas a "cook" is not really conducive to scientific discovery and evolution of concepts towards the greater good. I'm certain I've just instigated a flurry of pending ego driven self-validating responses.... standing by... :)
jackkedrabbit 3 months ago
@jackkedrabbit I agree - if people stopped seeing science as some 'egotistical' race to an 'answer' from safe 'ivory' towers, they might realise that scientists are far more open-minded than they think. Take the faster-than-light neutrino issue. Potentially, it has the power to overturn, or re-write, many sacred cows of physics. But scientists are excited, giddy and falling over each other to test the results. That's not hiding from new research or ideas, nor attempting to censor them.
steeltable218 3 months ago
@steeltable218 that's definitely the way to be. perhaps it's more the stranglehold the private sector has on research that's arresting innovation. I think scientists have a responsibility to share research and move us forward as a species.
jackkedrabbit 3 months ago
@jackkedrabbit So true.
kingyisthebest5 3 months ago
Team Haramein better than Team Lisi!
steelskipper44 3 months ago
I wish there were more than 45 videos. I didn't want this series to end.
looptricious 4 months ago
Nassim Haramein!!!! Thank you for your wonderful contributions to mankind! I love to meditate on this information. Truly mind expanding.
looptricious 4 months ago
Why is the scientific community so dogmatic. Nassim is exploring the universe beyond the fixed boundaries of your rigid institutions. You people should remeber that Newton was rejected by the scientic community of his time. Newton spoke of seeing gravity long before he was able to prove it's existence to the rigid Dons of his time. Some of the most qualified academics are also the people with the least amount of common sense. Optics would be a unknown field without Newton. Nassim stay strong.
simplysell1 4 months ago
I have learned so much from your videos. To increase knowledge is the key to growth. You have helped me to appreciate the true value of chemistry, biology and physics.
A different subject now; I want everybody to know about the disgusting things going on in England between humans and animal.
Please watch this video;
"Many people in Britain are sleeping with dogs! Get me out if England!
Black people need to know what is going on.
simplysell1 4 months ago
@simplysell1 LMMFAO!!!! HAHA! THAT IS FUCKING HILARIOUS!
Arcknagar 2 months ago
@Arcknagar I am glad that I was able to make you smile. Scientists often forget how to laugh. Clean up your language and I might just keep you laughing with my videos for years. You can see the logic of Nassim's theories. Your mind is clearly awake; it has removed the boundaries of scientific dogma. Great stuff!
simplysell1 2 months ago
deferentialgeometry org
justincgs 4 months ago
Nassim Haramein can't be taken seriously until he at least has an entry at arxiv and be asked to talk at TED...
Just as Garrett Lisi has done.
justincgs 4 months ago
Garrett Lisi also did a talk for TED
ted dot com/index.php/talks/garrett_lisi_on_his_theory_of_everything.html
justincgs 4 months ago
And here is his paper...
A REAL PHYSICS PAPER
arxiv dot org/abs/0711.0770
justincgs 4 months ago
IF you guys are interested in REAL physics/mathematics and REAL cutting edge maths with a real logical and mathematical basis to it...
GOOGLE
GARRETT LISI
OR
Watch the first episode of Through the Wormhole
justincgs 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This idiot charges $12 to call him on Skype... He's actually compared himself to Einstein !!!
The idiots in the crowd paid him over $3000 to listen to this BS for two days. Also this didn't include hotel expense flight etc.
It costs over $5000 dollars to waste a weekend listening to this idiot that has less physics knowledge than a grade 11 high school student.
justincgs 4 months ago
Comment removed
justincgs 4 months ago
What a kook.
Convincing-sounding jargon is no replacement for actual science. This guy is a complete fraud.
sincristo 4 months ago
His theory implies that the nucleus of a single atom of hydrogen has a mass of nearly a billion tons!!!
He's a FRAUD! What academic credentials does this idiot have! NONE! as far as I can tell...
justincgs 4 months ago
I watched his "Black Whole" DVD and he said that he didn't agree with his teacher saying that non-existant two dimensional things could turn into three dimensional things if two dimensional things don't exist. But 2D doesn't exist in the 3D realm and you can confirm this by trying to touch a picture. Try to feel the curves of a ball just by feeling a picture. But other things that he says are interesting! :D
LifeIsABigPuzzle 4 months ago
"you have to rewire your brain" (except for the 0.00001% of us who didn't get brainwashed, I mean schooled).
gr8vibes2 4 months ago 2
Comment removed
gr8vibes2 4 months ago
Unfortunately it seems to me that the non-scientist acolytes only adds to the problems surrounding him. Alluding to vague conspiracies doesn't help to clarify or justify anything. The "peer review process" has proven itself to be a good system for ensuring good science is done - science is successful. Examples of bad science slipping through the process are low in number. It is a distributed system, there is no "central control" and the media play no part in the review process.
lemonhead1961 4 months ago
@4:00 and still hasn't started.. Stopped watching. Meh.
AlyaaGad 5 months ago
@astraltraveler420 You do not need faith or trust in a teacher/speaker - you use the basic laws of physics and known constants, e.g. Newton’s Law of universal gravitation, Gravitation Constant G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N m2 kg-2, mass of the Earth = 6.0 x 10^24 kg, radius of the Earth = 6.4 x 10^6 m, etc so long as you can substitute values in this is not difficult - it's basic maths. Show me anywhere where NH works through any new physics using numbers and derives or predicts anything. He never does.
lemonhead1961 5 months ago
@lemonhead1961 If you can drop a brick, weight it, measure a distance, time it's fall and use F=ma and F=G.m1.m2/R^2 - you can do the maths yourself to make an estimate of the mass of the earth.
lemonhead1961 5 months ago
@TheMushshroom Moreover, what does it tell u about Haramein when he blatantly lies about comet NEAT in this lecture, and totally misrepresents quantum mechanics (e.g we don't care about causes)? Why would a true scientist have to lie and misrepresent the facts like that? I think it shows he knows how gullible & scientifically ignorant his audience is, and therefore he can get away with any old bollocks as long as he presents it in a manner pleasing to them
TwistedQuills 5 months ago
@TheMushshroom I, along with others, challenge the claims made. Why do u see a problem with that? They can do what i've done, and watch Haramein's tedious lecture, but isn't it funny that when Haramein groupies ARE challenged on the facts, they either fail to respond, or do so in such a way as to show they have no understanding of even basic science, e.g the claim that a Hollow Earth is thought of as 'likely' by scientists? What does that tell you about them?
TwistedQuills 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
azureworld.blogspot.com/2010/02/nassim-haramein-fraud-or-sage-part-2.html
DoodlebugFlower 5 months ago
Comment removed
DoodlebugFlower 5 months ago
@astraltraveler420 How do i know? Oh, just the fact that S and P waves from earthquakes travel THROUGH the Earth (as i already mentioned, if u bothered to read my comments). Oh, and a little thing called GRAVITY, which can be directly measured. Maybe you've heard of it? Imagine how little of it the Earth would have if it was hollow!
TwistedQuills 5 months ago
@TwistedQuills and don't come at me Calling me a loser or fag I want ur honest answer don't get hostile or nothin cuz hostility shows that ur not open minded and don't Argue that cuz I know a bunch of ppl who over react when ever u try to bring up a point that contradicts what they believe
astraltraveler420 5 months ago
@TwistedQuills ok so u don't support Nassime theory's so stop trolling and go watch a physics video u like. And plus how do u know that the earth Isnt hollow how do u personally know that everything that comes out of a academic is truth, how do u know that you aren't being fed a bunch of bullshit hmm get back at me
astraltraveler420 5 months ago
Comment removed
lemonhead1961 5 months ago
The use of "semi-classical physics" - a quote from his so called "paper", was not justified, it was inappropriate physics - relativistic physics should have been used.
lemonhead1961 5 months ago
I am not aware that he is proposing any theory - theories have to produce testable predictions and be accepted by the wider community. What phenomena does he describe using quantifiable data? The words "sacred geometry" for instance, mean absolutely nothing - it's just geometry. I think most physicists see the beauty in many things but beauty isn't an intrisic or meaningful property of anything - it's a human "quality" which means nothing in or to the laws of physics.
lemonhead1961 5 months ago
It's great that so many people are enthused by his entertaining meanderings BUT I'd hope it would motivate listeners to learn some real physics for themselves, not hero worship NH - read a good, simple but entertaining book on some branch of physics like Chad Orzel's "How to Teach Quantum Physics to Your Dog"
lemonhead1961 5 months ago
@lemonhead1961 You should probably watch all 45 videos on his theory before you draw conclusions, I mean that's real science isn't it, get all the data and THEN draw conclusions. By the way what is the "Force" behind the mechanics of the universe?
cambell1308 4 months ago in playlist Nassim Haramein - The Unified Field Theory
@cambell1308 A characteristically facile response apparently showing no understanding of the distinction between a "literature review" and "practical physics". Real world physicists will use "citation databases" to look for peer reviewed articles published in respected journals (of which there are many) - NH does not show up in these & consequently his "work" is not recognised inspite of claims to have "worked in the field" for many years. e.g. library upenn edu / scitech / mpa /
lemonhead1961 4 months ago
@lemonhead1961 Probably because all "peer reviewed articles published in respected journals" translates to is controlled by mass media. Wake up buddy. Why do you think all kinds of respected peer reviewed published scientists are currently trying to rewrite Nassim's theory with names very close to his Unified Filed Theory? Because the guy is so right it isnt even funny. Read his Schwatrzchild Proton Theory paper and then talk.
anitclothing 4 months ago in playlist Nassim Haramein - The Unified Field Theory
@cambell1308 The forces at work depend on the scale. I worked for 20+ years post-graduate with mass spectrometer development, particle accelerators, cancer research and at a national laboratory on fundamental measurements besides many other things.
lemonhead1961 4 months ago
@cambell1308 There is no force, it's all an illusion - energy is an illusion - it is just a product of consciousness, as is the whole universe and the observer as well.
mikedans55 4 months ago in playlist Nassim Haramein - The Unified Field Theory
@mikedans55 OK so there is no force ? hmm , really so we all live in a stagnate universe and you are quoting "physics"? does not the word "physics" apply by it's very nature to something physical? Physics is the study of the physical universe as we know it. I think that your thought stream leads more towards the "meta" physical (meta meaning after, beyond or adjacent) to the physical rather than the physical or "Physics"
cambell1308 4 months ago
@TheBobathon Yup, that guy is pretty representative of a typical Haramein groupie, judging by the sorts of responses they've posted here and other places. Lmao
TwistedQuills 5 months ago
@TwistedQuills Yeah? Tell me more? What kind of person did you expect to find on a Nassim Haramein video? Atleast I can admire that "groupie" for pursuing what he enjoys.
You, on the other hand, seem to find delight bashing another persons thoughts- patrolling peoples image of this person to think similar to your own- without giving them a fair chance to base THEIR opinion on the information he presents. Your actions and condescending tone tell me more about you than the "facts" that you tell
TheMushshroom 5 months ago 2
Dudes, you don't need to watch eight hours of this - you can see Haramein's entire argument presented at watch?v=GnzoxSEiW88 in less than five minutes :-)
You got to admit, he has a point...
TheBobathon 5 months ago
@DontTreadOnMe476 And please, do enlighten us poor peasants on how Einstein thought that Relativity was wrong (a theory that no experiment has contradicted, btw). Go ahead, i'm all ears/eyes!
In case u missed it the last 2 times i asked
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 Done any research on earthquakes yet? Or are you, like other Haramein supporters, gonna just ignore inconvenient facts that totally undermine Harameins silly assertions? I mean, honestly, what sort of physicist claims the Earth is hollow?! For crying out loud, if that doesn't send up huge red flags in your head, what the fuck will?
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
1/45.lmao damn i got a long way to go.
DevornCauser 6 months ago in playlist Nassim Haramein - The Unified Field Theory
poor lightworker still thinks the world is flat ....and solid
galactikbutterfly 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 Solid core reflects nothing? False. Why not try doing, oh maybe 5 WHOLE MINUTES of research on earthquakes, particularly S and P waves, and get back to me?
As for holes at the poles, that comment just shows what a deluded science illiterate you are, and how you can't even apply a little common sense to your claims. North Pole is covered in water. How does this water not flush down into the hole u claim is there? Use your head for more than a hatstand!
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 Is that cancer paper you referred to available online? I'd like to have a look. Just so you know, the Maharishi school is hardly the most respectable institution, as their laughable 'experiment' attempting to show the power of TM meditation to lower crime rates in Washington DC shows.
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@DontTreadOnMe476 And please, do enlighten us poor peasants on how Einstein thought that Relativity was wrong (a theory that no experiment has contradicted, btw). Go ahead, i'm all ears/eyes!
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 YES, earthquakes, or rather the waves generated by them, travel through the core of the Earth. The P waves do anyway, the S waves are reflected by the solid core. That's how we know the core is solid. How could any machanical waves travel through if the Earth was hollow? You see, just 1 more example of Haramein's unscientific nonsense, that none of his new-age audience, or you either it seems, were able to spot.
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@TwistedQuills gosh no.. scientists claim that the Earth rings like a bell when there is an Earthquake, and this so called solid core reflects nothing.. in fact scientists say that it's because of the molten lava that it doesn't go through, but the same can be said if the Earth is hollow.. it doesn't really matter what you say, you can see the holes leading in to the planets on any planet, if you do just a tad of research, and they are always near the planet's axis. NASA brushes Earth's out.
lightworker2011 6 months ago
Actually, i'm only on a phone at the mo. No reply button that i can see! Anyway, what's wrong with debate in the open that all can see?
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
No reply yet from
DontTreadOnMe476.
I've noticed that patten. Whenever those who like/agree/accept Haramein's speil are asked a specific question, about, you know, PHYSICS, the can NEVER answer. Hmmm....
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@lightworker2011
"and it isn't scoffed at by science either, because it is likely."
Oh really? It's likely that the Earth is hollow?
Please explain how S and P waves, from every earthquake, travel through the world then, and how that is explained by a Hollow Earth.
How do these waves travel in just such a way through the emptiness of a hollow sphere, to give the same results as 'ordinary' science predicts?
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@TwistedQuills Good question. Can you tell me how radio waves travel through space? it means nothing whether I know how.. but the earth still has a thick crust, and lava beneath, that never changed.. it just means it's more hollow than what they once believed.. do you presume that Earthquakes travel THROUGH the core of the earth? I predict that the center is more stable.. it's kind of like the earth used to be flat, and then.. it was round. Now.. it is a living organism with a center.
lightworker2011 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 I'm on a phone at the moment. What's your point? Do u have any substansive rebuttals, or observations?
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
And please, do enlighten us poor peasants on how Einstein thought that Relativity was wrong (a theory that no experiment has contradicted, btw). Go ahead, i'm all ears/eyes!
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@TwistedQuills TwistedQuills , you should press REPLY unless your not confident of your position.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@DontTreadOnMe476 Wrong for 60yrs? So predicting the W and Z bosons was an error? Calculating the magnetic moment of an electron, to agreement with experiment of 9 or more decimal places, is an error? Or the period reduction of a pair of pulsars to equal or greater accuracy? That's an error too? Want me to go on with my list of successes for modern physics, or is that enough to show your wrongness?
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 Can you name one single physical prediction his 'theory' of the Schwarzchild Proton has made that has been verified by experiment?
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 "At least it's closer than theories like quantum physics and the big bang, and string theory.. they're all shots in the dark using nothing but math.." You think Quantum Mechanics and the Big Bang theory don't have any observational evidence to support them? Shows how much you know about modern physic, i.e little or nothing. Pfft
TwistedQuills 6 months ago
@TwistedQuills You act as if modern science has the answers already. You are the problem with modern physics. You cling to a model that is clearly wrong and has been for 60+ years. You even mock anything different, god forbid someone hypothesize anything different than your model. There are so many flaws with the scientific model that it is no where near completion. Einstein even knew and admitted that relativity wasn't correct. How can you judge someone when YOU know so very little.
DontTreadOnMe476 6 months ago
Comment removed
lightworker2011 6 months ago
@TwistedQuills shots in the dark as in, assuming that logic alone holds the answers.. nevertheless, the world needs logic AND spiritual awareness.. it is through a wholesome awareness that humans will integrate spiritual evolution as a whole.. the realm of physics is strongly in the polarity of logic.. incomplete. whether you like it or not, they have to combine.. the science world draws people in that are in the polarity mind, but they will have to wake up and find their heart center
lightworker2011 6 months ago
I don't think science accepts his theory because science has ignored some things. Science is a polarized mechanism, defining the universe using logic, when the only way to understand an esoteric universe is through full awareness and experience, and paying attention to sacred geometry. His theories may not be exact, At least it's closer than theories like quantum physics and the big bang, and string theory.. they're all shots in the dark using nothing but math.. which one's more ridiculous?
lightworker2011 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 Science ignores his theories because they don't work, and his predictions don't tally with observations and measurements in nature. What is an 'esoteric universe' btw? And why can't logic be a valid part of 'full awareness and experience'? Are formal logic and experience mutually exclusive?
steeltable218 6 months ago
@steeltable218 you're wrong.. he has small math problems with his work, but the sacred geometry part is correct, as is the more elegant aspects of his theory. But, he didn't really come up with the theory originally himself.. he just brought stuff together and is trying to invite it to physics, perhaps not a realistic thing to do. Esoteric means spiritual, which is the universe we live in. His predictions do so tally with observations in nature, with the sacred geometry, which he didnt invent
lightworker2011 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 Most of our theories are shots in the dark, the shots are getting a lot better though. : )
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 Well I don't go by 'theories'. I follow the highest emotion. Knowing is not the same as believing.. science believes, it is the same as religion. This is why scientists are not able to know, they can only believe in what they say and that is 2-dimensional thinking.. we are 3-dimensional human beings integrating the 4th.. knowing comes from the heart center, not the brain.
lightworker2011 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 You go by your theories or models of the world every day. Otherwise you couldn't function in ti. Models inform every action, perception, reaction and emotion. I suppose because Haramein evokes a high emotion of positivity within you, then he must be correct? Do you believe that only things that do this are true? Science proceeds from doubt or scepticism. You proceed from certainty. Which is more humble? Oh, and this logician loves the Gita too.
steeltable218 6 months ago
@steeltable218 No, high emotion is not a theory or a model, its a product of full awareness, and it comes not from the brain of logic.. your heart center is not your brain, it is also not a metaphor. It is your HEART CENTER and I mean it literally, the electromagnetic energy of your chest is greater than any other place in your body. The first thing formed in a fetus is the heart and out of that comes the tongue, and in chi gong they use this to ground the heart to the brain. ta da..
lightworker2011 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 God planted the seed inside us. look withen to find truth. Ask God, or ask a Guru/Mystic. You seem like your on your way to becoming a Guru. : )
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 hah, well thank you, but then anyone can be a guru if they are centered in their heart, the true center of consciousness. BTW, another cure for cancer; maple syrup and baking soda (a brand without aluminum in it).. cook it for 5 minutes, don't let it burn, have 3 teaspoons a day.. cancer loves sugar, the sugar goes right to the cancer and the baking soda is pure alkaline, cancer cant handle it.. in conjunction with vegan diet, cancer will regress, or disappear. Ta da!
lightworker2011 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 I dont like to eat meat. I might eat meat if it was treated well, and raised naturally. I see a lot of pain and suffering when I visit the local store for food. 200,000,000 male chicklets are grinded each year at birth. : (
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 "Cancer loves sugar" is this why we should eat less white sugar?
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 well yeah there are many kinds of sugars, but it's synthetic sugar that's not good for ya.. honey and maple syrup are fine, good even. And yeah, I don't like how animals are slaughtered either.. not one bit. When you eat animals you eat their fear energy.. keeps you in a lower awareness..
lightworker2011 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 That only follows if everything Haramein says is accurate and truthful. For the most part, it's neither. He says the Earth is hollow, for crying out loud!
TwistedQuills 7 months ago
@TwistedQuills "He says the Earth is hollow, for crying out loud!" yeah, and so did Hitler, and how many high ranking officials in governments during the second world war. It wasn't an invention of Haramein's, this goes back quiite a ways.. and it isn't scoffed at by science either, because it is likely.
lightworker2011 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 Have you studied the Bhagavad Gita? You seem like someone that has.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
Respond to this video... no I haven't studied it. I have only one teacher and it brings me all answers I could need. All one needs is the heart center!
lightworker2011 6 months ago
@lightworker2011 it tells you all you need to know, it doesnt lead to you to read history, you just know? Then you need to tell me something I don't know. I know the spirit guides and can tell us all the secrets. If you are a Mystic then teach me your hidden knowledge.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
Comment removed
lightworker2011 6 months ago
there's a misunderstanding.. I am here on youtube aren't I? what I meant was, I don't subscribe to a particular teaching, though im familiar with some.. I meant, the existence brings me what i need to know, I don't have to try so hard to find info here on the web.. without the internet, we would not be going through these changes and evolving nearly as quickly. Sorry for the misunderstanding, but I guess I could have just said no, Ive never read it. :P
lightworker2011 6 months ago
For that matter, explain Hooke's Law. Or Electromagnetic Theory, which explains electric and magnetic attraction as well as repulsion.
TwistedQuills 7 months ago
If there are just 2 types of energy, 'expansive and contractive', and physicists have ignored the latter, explain Newton's and Einstein's gravitatioal theories. Surely gravity is 'contractive', if anything is
TwistedQuills 7 months ago
Btw, REAL physicists don't talk about 'nasty infinity'. You're operating under the mistaken assumption that Haramein tells the truth. He doesn't. Same goes for that guff about 'the 1st rule of quantum physics is we don't care about causation', which is a blatant lie
TwistedQuills 7 months ago
Is it any wonder that the physics community ignores him? They don't even care about what he says enough to refute him. He may as well not exist, as far as physicists are concerned. Maybe he'd get a reaction if he tried to persuade the Texas Schoolboard to include his ideas in their physics textbooks? Lol
TwistedQuills 7 months ago
@lightworker2011 Actually, i DID watch most of it (didn't bother much with the ancient history part). I know enough physics to see right through this guy. He predicts NOTHING, he explains NOTHING, makes up meanings for words as it suits him, and makes claims that are VERIFIABLY WRONG
TwistedQuills 7 months ago
@lightworker2011 You are a shame. Did you believe in Harold Camping, too?
MarFish101 7 months ago
He throws around so many buzzwords in ways that make no sense. That little motor with the string? He claims the pattern it shows is a fractal? No it isn't! It's either a standing wave, or a travelling wave messily interfering with itself. Black Hole at the centre of a hollow Earth? Gimme a break! Cells as singularities? How can anyone take such statements seriously? Obviously his audience don't have a clue what the words mean
TwistedQuills 7 months ago
I agree, props to @TheBobathon. It's unfortunate people don't realize Haramein is nothing more than a scammer for your money.
MarFish101 7 months ago
@MarFish101 Now, that made me laugh hard. For people criticizing Harmein's life long research
claiming that he's some kind of scammer, even though he poured his life in to it, WAKE UP!..
if you can sit through, starting from the beginning, 4 hours of talking, then you will begin to see
that he is undeniably correct, and he has a firm understanding in the current belief systems of physics,
which is fundamentally FLAWED by their own design and ignorance.
lightworker2011 7 months ago in playlist Nassim Haramein - The Unified Field Theory
Well done to Bobathon for putting the effort into shredding this fraud's ridiculous claims. It's a pity more new-age adherents don't read some REAL science, so they wouldn't be taken in by deceiving wankers like Haramein (but i suppose if they did, they wouldn't be part of the new-age 'scene' for very long)
TwistedQuills 7 months ago
@TwistedQuills Yeah, Bob's done a great job with this prat. I like the basic motivations of New Agers; ecological values, harmonious living, the embrace of nature, exploring new perceptions etc. It's a pity they seem to want to throw out their brains at the same time. I can't see how the pursuit of elevated consciousness is helped by cluttering the mind with pap. Stepping to enlightenment means keeping our feet on the ground...
steeltable218 7 months ago
@steeltable218 You won't have a place to put your feet when we radiate ourselves to death. There are 2 kinds of energy, expansion and contraction, and science has dealt primarily with expansion energy which is radiation energy. Physics has literally ignored contraction energy, using words like "NASTY INFINITY", because it got in the way of their formulas, so they normalize this problem and continue.. CONTRACTION energy is the forces of creation which we can tap in to, and have CLEAN ENERGY!
lightworker2011 7 months ago in playlist Nassim Haramein - The Unified Field Theory
How can anyone take this guy seriously? Even people with only secondary school physics, or just an interest in reading/watching popular science physics books/documentaries, should be able to see right through this charlatan in 5 minutes flat!
TwistedQuills 7 months ago
@TwistedQuills Secondary physics, elementary physics, it doesn't matter.. it's all inherently
FLAWED, as he describes in his seminar. And you would see that it is flawed if you decided
to watch his whole seminar.
lightworker2011 7 months ago in playlist Nassim Haramein - The Unified Field Theory
If you hear quacking do not be surprised. It's coming from Nassim Haramein. This guy is a total fraud. His work is unscientific, mystic mumbo jumbo. Go read the blogs from other scientists actually working in the field of relativity, quantum mechanics, gravitation, etc.. none of his calculations are accurate and all his arguments are fallacious. This IS NOT SCIENCE! It's mysticism+spiritualism with a psuedo-science topping.
viper8red 7 months ago
Comment removed
lightworker2011 7 months ago in playlist Nassim Haramein - The Unified Field Theory
Comment removed
steeltable218 7 months ago
Comment removed
lightworker2011 7 months ago
@lightworker2011 The same sad non-argument levelled at 'establishment science'... Despite what you may think, scientists aren't afraid of change. Or of changing themselves and their beliefs in light of new evidence. If it were so, there would be no progress, there'd just be stasis. Any scientists that LEGITIMATELY overturned established theories would get into the history books. Scientists are prudent in accepting ideas that have no evidence to support them. Like Haramein's.
steeltable218 7 months ago
Comment removed
lightworker2011 7 months ago
@steeltable218 How about the 1957 Physics Nobel peace prize winners who found the source charge problem. If science had accepted that, then all the modern text books need to be thrown out and rewritten.
DontTreadOnMe476 6 months ago
@DontTreadOnMe476 "And please, do enlighten us poor peasants on how Einstein thought that Relativity was wrong (a theory that no experiment has contradicted, btw). Go ahead, i'm all ears/eyes!
TwistedQuills 1 day ago "
TwistedQuills had a question for you, he didn't press reply but it was direct toward you. : ) Guess he wanted others to think he was right but did not want you to actually answer, you'll find a lot of egos like this.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 I rather think he simply forgot to press the right button and just commented instead of replied. It's so odd that the so-called 'spiritually aware' seem to want to find hidden motives and agendas in everything and everyone. TwistedQuills has nothing to fear from DontTread's acumen.
steeltable218 6 months ago
@steeltable218 So called huh, You condemn others you condemn yourself not me
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@steeltable218 I am not deluded in my thinking to assume human beings have ego! if you are stuck in insults in hate thats you stuck on the lower path. I hope you get out of it somehow. Jesus helps!
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 Please quote where I insulted or condemned you. If there's a problem here, I think it's that you see (and read) what you want to see. Of course humans have 'ego' (which has several definitions), I never implied we don't. I'm certainly not a hateful person, despite what you choose to see.
steeltable218 6 months ago
@DontTreadOnMe476 Well, Lester Pearson actually won the 1957 Nobel Peace Prize for establishing an international police force to resolve the 1956 Suez Crisis. Wang and Lee won the 1957 Nobel in Physics for finding a violation of the 'absolute' and fundamental parity laws regarding two particles, not a source charge problem. This wasn't ignored by science. The main proponent of the 'source charge problem' is Tom Bearden, a well-known basket case even in free-energy circles.
steeltable218 6 months ago
@steeltable218 That is not true at all, thats all they can do to keep people from listening, attack his creditability. Your own words reinforce my beliefs even more.
DontTreadOnMe476 6 months ago
@DontTreadOnMe476 On Tom Bearden, as he has much in common with Haramein... he's a self-styled expert on over-unity physics. He's achieved his status not by professional peer-reviewed publications, attending major mainstream conferences, or creating real-world demonstrations, but by playing to the fringe net-crowd through substantial publicity. What's made his rise possible is absence of critical evaluation of his theories, as he always keeps away from the qualified.
steeltable218 6 months ago
@DontTreadOnMe476 Tom Bearden has admitted to a fake PhD; some undemonstrated claims are: a unified field theory (yawn); a cure for cancer; revealed the 'fundamental secret' of over-unity; the 'final secret' of free energy; how to 'deactivate' radioactive materials; has 'proven' the fundamentals of EM theory are wrong; found a physical mechanism for reincarnation and deserves 'more than a Nobel Prize'.
steeltable218 6 months ago
@steeltable218 Why do you need a piece of paper to say whether or not you can be listened to. The whole peer reviewed process is bull. I worked for a guy that could fully charge 7 batteries off of one of the same batteries. I watched it with my own eyes. I cannot expect you to grasp reality and realize what a farce modern science is. Free energy is real and easily verifiable, your taught to believe you cannot create something out of "nothing" from day one.
DontTreadOnMe476 6 months ago
@DontTreadOnMe476 Well, a research PhD from a reputable university is more than just a 'piece of paper'. Why do you find the peer-review process 'bull'? It's just there to check the scientific, methodological and mathematical integrity of a paper, a kind of quality control. It's not there to test findings. I'm open to over-unity energy if it exists, but if it's real and easy as you say, why don't free-energy guys just power their houses with it and invite a few local engineers over?
steeltable218 6 months ago
@steeltable218 Well if you looked at what has happened to many of the others that have come out with there inventions. I would learn to shut up about it and keep it to myself. The guy that had the generator was very nervous about showing it and was not too fast to give information out. He uses it to power his car, he hasn't paid for gas for years. As far as his house im not sure.
DontTreadOnMe476 6 months ago
@DontTreadOnMe476 If I'd found a source of free energy that was legitimate and demonstrably irrefutable, I'd hide in plain sight. Simultaneously contact scientists, engineers, local press (to feed to the nationals); tv news; and build a visible internet presence; get a PR company on board. I'd be completely safe in the open. Hiding a world-changing discovery because of the fear of a 'mysterious death' is cowardice and selfishness. I'd surely put the world's needs before my own, wouldn't you?
steeltable218 6 months ago
@steeltable218 You think its as easy as that. Yep just get all of these people to jump on board. The press is controlled by the same people who control oil. Oil is a multi trillion dollar industry, The largest industry in the world next to banking. So no matter what people you have standing next to you at all times and how open you are about it, it will not matter. Look up the car that was ran off of water, he went to the press and tried to patent it.
DontTreadOnMe476 6 months ago
@DontTreadOnMe476 Yes, it is as easy as that. If you disseminate the information and your discovery widely, then it's utterly pointless to kill you, isn't it? You can still keep the patent and cream off the top. By 'the press', you men every single paper and media organisation on the globe? All owned by the oil industry? Or are we talking shadowy groups here? It's very easy to opt out through irrational fear rather than doing something with your life, isn't it? Who was the car guy? Name, please.
steeltable218 6 months ago
Comment removed
DontTreadOnMe476 6 months ago
@steeltable218 google "hydro powered car guy"
DontTreadOnMe476 6 months ago
@steeltable218 THC has cured cancer for a long time, notice how when we made cannabis illegal and stopped the true Chrsim of Christians the Christians have become ignorant of thier own teaching, dying of cancer, and diesese. I have a 12 page PEER REVIEWED by real accredited Ph. D.s at Iowa State and Maharishi University. I wonder if you have it in you to learn, to listen to instruction. Smoking cannabis does some things but the real cure is found in the oil. Read the paper? or conceed
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 What on earth are you raving about? I never even mentioned the subject of THC and cancer, you loon.
steeltable218 6 months ago
OK... If this is all true, PLEASE explain to me why he hasn't won the Nobel Prize in Physics? (because with this discovery, he most certainly WOULD win.
Is it:
a) because his ideas don't pass the rigors of the scientific method
OR
b) because the (entire) scientific community and the government is trying to keep him quiet
OR
c) because he'd rather sell DVD's on his website and NOT win this prestigious award and contribute to to science
cptstubing 8 months ago 2
@cptstubing I understand your criticism but you are wrong in giving so much value to the Nobel prize. The nobel prize or any other prize for that matter is not a metric of truth. Its just a psychological exploitation where scientists get pitted against one another for superficial glory. Those who maintain the arbitrary monetary economic system doesn't want individuals to reflect on their knowledge. They'd rather see us invest our energy on base egotistical pursuits.
agent0sephiroth 8 months ago
@agent0sephiroth I do also agree with what you are saying. However I must emphasize that a discovery such as this would almost certainly get the attention of all humanity. If what he is proposing is true, it would be the discovery of all discoveries. I think this physicist is simply trying to become popular. He can't back up anything he claims.
It is though typically the crazy scientists who make outlandish claims that end up being correct (think Kepler, Copernicus, Brahe, Galilei, Newton)
cptstubing 8 months ago
@cptstubing
my guess would be that non-mainstream science are a lot harder to be recognised by their peer.
Politics and stuff
OmtaThien 8 months ago
@OmtaThien Yes politics is a lot of it.. but when the science isn't embraced because the math or logic doesn't make sense, or there is too much speculation and not enough hard evidence collected from rigorous experimentation and testing, then it isn't science. It is pseudoscience, which this guy seems to be producing.
cptstubing 8 months ago
@cptstubing
that is true. For the case of quantum science though I think scientists are turned off by it because the finding did not support the ideal or the bias. it is surprising how far they go to negate new findings when it actually contradicts the idea of scientific determinism.
OmtaThien 7 months ago
@OmtaThien RIght, when new science contradicts old science, it is easy to resist the new stuff, but not always. As it should be, great claims need great evidence. You can't say you were abducted by aliens without very good evidence. New ideas are often not met with open minds though, you are right.
cptstubing 7 months ago