How "Holy" is Your Bible? The NIV Translation Exposed 1/2

[TRITCHEE]

LUCIFIER WAS CALLED THE MORNING STAR AT ONE POINT. WHEN HE WAS LUCIFIER HE WAS BRIGHT AND BEAUTIFUL. HE COULD SING. NOW HE'S SATAN BUT I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOUR COMING FROM

[TRITCHEE]

KJV ACTS 8:37 IS STILL THERE.

NIV ACTS 8:37 HAS BEEN TAKEN OUT. IS A VERY IMPORTANT SCRIPTURE. PEOPLE WILL THINK IN ORDER TO BE SAVED YOU MUST BE BAPTIZED. ALSO, KJV-NIV, 1 COR. 1:18- KJV/WHICH ARE SAVED. NIV/ ARE BEING SAVED.

[jcisgod98]

I love it when people say "It does not matter which bible you use" especially the Jehovah's Witness. It's quite obvious the modern translations like the HIV excuse me NIV, they demish Christ to lower being, remove his deity, he is not ascribed worship, his Lordship is removed etc. Really, any bible will do? They all say the samething? Then these people are blind as bats. When you witness to these people, FAST AND PRAY.

[8zz8]

The verses mentioned in this video were not found in the earliest manuscripts. They were added in by scribes/copyists over the ages. Sometimes to clarify, and sometimes to reinforce new doctrines eg. trinity.

[xXxCOV3RTxXx]

NIV is a deceptive translation look at ISAIAH 14:12 NKJV

"How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How you are cut down to the ground, You who weakened the nations! BUT look what it says in ISAIAH 14:12 How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations! they took out Lucifer and replaced it for Morning star and in REV 22:16 Jesus says he is the Bright and Morning Star see the deception

[billenh]

the niv has been updated, and is supposed to be avaiable mar / '11

[billenh]

this came up at church...yikes! i thank you SEK4110 for your previous response, providing a lead...i have to present this info...thank you...

[RyanMoran13]

Someone needs to give this lady a reality check:

1) While you can certainly make an argument that the Bible is inspired, her four points that we "know" about the Bible are all self-verifying. It does not make logical sense to quote something that only self verifies itself. It's like me saying, "I am awesome. You know how I am awesome? Because I say I am." You can't base an argument off of self-verification.

(continued below)

[RyanMoran13]

2) John 8 - the story of the adulterous woman - was not in the earliest manuscripts of Scripture, it was (shocker coming) ADDED later... does that mean that "Go and sin no more" is actually the work of Satan's subtle attacks??

3) If this lady's proof texting is correct that God actively preserves the Bible, you'd think he would inspire people to translate correctly. The crafty enemy though, probably made the evil NIV writers translate on the Sabbath while God was resting...

(continued below)

[RyanMoran13]

4) Re: quote from Revelation about alteration

John is writing to his audience about HIS prophecies, not the rest of the Bible. John was saying, "Let he who adds to THIS book have the plagues listed in THIS book." John had no way of knowing that his visions were going to end up in the Bible, so it's impossible for him to be referencing taking words out of our physical Bible.

(continued below)

[RyanMoran13]

5) The NIV is translated using OLDER documents than the KJV. The King James was written BEFORE the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered, so it's actually LESS accurate. Changes were made to make it more accurate, not the work of Satan.

[WatchThisVideos]

I'm a Christian but its suspicious all this KJV stuff because 777 are the the divine numbers from the"Book of Law"by Aliester Crowley.You can see that the movie"Book of Eli"its just an anagram of "Book of Lie"refering to the KJV in the movie, so Book of Eli/Lie/Law its refering to Aliester Crowley's book & if you see the roots of Gail Riplinger(KJV defender),i mean she studied on the illuminati oxford university,so i think KJV is like Thelema Crowley's teachings disguised with a Christian cover

[Queenyinthehouse]

LOVE YOU GIRLFRIEND.. The one who has complete control over the NIV is Rupert Murdock, but not only does he have complete control over the NIV but ALL of them because he owns the rights. So, anyone else who wants to profit HAS to go to him. His associates are Rick Warren and John Piper who are ministers of satan who have helped to promote AND endorse the NIV because it is VERY profittable for satan to have ALL his followers in "unity". If everyone is on the same page, it's EASIER to gain souls.

[1948kitty]

yes you will see word taken out and words changed and whole phrases removed or scriptures changed. You will see in most translations the blood of Jesus and the fasting and prayer watered down or taken out completely in some. Sad really

[REVPIPSTER]

After 10 minutes, Ms Riplinger has not mentioned once any reference to Greek or Hebrew Texts. This is a denominational distraction! Opps after 13 mins there is a text. ONE and one little and a technicality. There are other older references too. If there is 64,000 words deliberatly ommitted from modern translation, then there should be tonns of proof text. She holds up one, after she spent 13 mins thumping down the other translations. This is what The Cults do! FACTS FACTS FACTS not fiction!

[REVPIPSTER]

James White, of Alpha and Omega Ministries, has several videos and audio debates on the errors of KJV Onlyism, of which MS Riplinger fronts. He has a Channel on You Tube..

I am concerned that this is a red herring to get Christians bickering each other over a translation. God have pretect the inspired Texts, The Greek and Hebrew. If the verses Riplinger qoutes in this video, were not in the greek texts dating back to the 1st Century, then Peter and Paul may not have taught them!

[REVPIPSTER]

KJV Onlyist are even on record to say that Christian form non English speaking nations, must learn English in order for them to read The KJV. I am concerned that many Christians who become KJV Onlyist, are aligning themselves with groups like the Mormons who base their beliefs of the KJV on the same reasons. The fall into the errors of the RC Church who burned English and German Bibles in the middle ages claiming Latin was inspired. Also do not forget The HOLY SPIRIT's Role in Bible reading!

[REVPIPSTER]

Riplinger is an KJV Onlyist. I have found that many of these people are fanatical, to a quite unhealthy level to using the King James Bible only. They forget that we now have far more accurate and older Greek and Hebrew Texts than they did in 1611 when the King James Bible was translated. I'm not saying The KJV is a bad translation, I am saying we should desire the real Milk of the Word and the more mature in Christ we become we do need more accuract Scriptures, based on the Greek not English!

[sinterminator]

If I open "BIBLEGATEWAY", it opens automatically in the NIV format

That's amazing.

[KnowJesusKnowPeace]

@sinterminator Notice also the crescent moons in the biblegateway logo. That identifies it to other satanists as the work of satanists. Use blueletterbible instead. 

[SEK4110]

@sinterminator I use Biblegateway as well and it never even dawned on me! 

[billenh]

i heard the niv was translated by a nazi...

[SEK4110]

@billenh The rights to the NIV are "owned" and copyright by porn king Ruport Murdock. He also owns the publishing company for the "Satanic Bible" by Anton Levay.

[kenandjasha]

boycotting the NIV in paper and electronic versions is the only way to get rid of it..hit them in the pocketbook...

It is shocking how lazy American Christians are. Mistranslations and passages outright left out in translation in the NIV are an EASY google search yet the vast majority still either do not know of the evils of NIV use or simply do not care and use it anyway.

[DeniseMatteau]

wow, they took the Trinity out! I need to get rid of my Not Inspired Version!

[KnowJesusKnowPeace]

@DeniseMatteau aka New Illuminati Version

[NephilimFree]

Gail is great. She demonstrates without any doubt how modern trasnaltioins are not only corrupt, but the work of satan! Good video sister.

[JimmyCarol100]

@SEK4110 I feel led to use KJV since it's the one mostly used by biblical scholars EW Bullinger for his work The Companion Bible, plus the KJV was used by Dr James Strong when converting the manuscripts from ancient languages to english with his numbering system in Strong's Exhaustive Concordance also Green's Interlinear Bible has all 3, ancient language, Strongs number and an english translation. I also use BlueLetterBible on internet, it has Strongs #'s & about 20 other translations. Peace2All

[JimmyCarol100]

@SEK4110 down at the bottom that #'s was just suppose to Strongs numbers and about 20 other translations in the BlueLetterBiblecom cause it has all kinds of study material, even pre-recorded pronunciation in the ancient languages, commentaries and study aids. Check it out if you get a chance, its great. Peace2U

[SEK4110]

@JimmyCarol100 I own a Companion bible as well. It is a great tool!

[33point3]

I like Susan - she is sweet & compassionate, she witness for Jesus & she has a good spirit. sometimes she gets emotional about being real but that means she's honest with GOD & she tries super hard to be true. I like her a lot - plus she's super cute : )

[SEK4110]

@33point3 Thank you for your kind words friend!

[ducklamb1]

good stuff but the name "Jesus " isnt the name given to the Christ.not even close.i read how the name has been translated over the years from hebrew to greek to other languages,but,my name is the same as is anybody elses in any language.i dont know why but the name thing really tugs at my strings.i know the real name and the history behind it,the name Jesus has no historical meaning in hebrew,as the real name does.why has the name been so successfully changed,while other Bible figures have not.

[1948kitty]

The NIV is missing 64,000 words that are either gone completely from the KJ Bible or changed to a meaning completely different. The other thing is the

Bibles after the 1611 KJ version have all been translated by Masons. All distorted and tainted to serve their purposes.

[SEK4110]

@1948kitty 64,000? I had no idea!

[REVPIPSTER]

@1948kitty Are these 64,000 words also missing from The Greek New Testament and The Hebrew Canon? I mean, If I go to the British Library and look at the Codex Sianiticus, the oldest Complete NT in the world and compare it to the KJV translation or the NIV (Which I don't really like by the way, I prefer the KJV, NLT and NASB) Will I see the words there or not?

And yes, The Masons do print their own KJV, I have a copy of one. Not seen a distortion in the text. rather than how they teach from it!

[ryanthecalvinist]

@1948kitty Saying the NIV is "missing words" is built on a faulty premise. You say they are missing because you use the KJV as the standard by which other translations are judged. It isn't. The Greek and Hebrew manuscripts we have are the standard. I'll put it this way: The verses the NIV/ESV... etc... "leave out" (they really put them in the footnotes, but they still are in the text) are not REMOVED from the Bible... they were wrongly ADDED to the Bible in the KJV.

[siftedby666]

Im not opposed to the idea of kjv being the best version,and im also no scholar,but it seems skewed to say those verses are omitted,as they are in the footnotes. Also,not adding or taking seems to be in context to the book of revelation,not the entire bible. The books are placed in order of size,not date written,which seems unwise to me of all translations,contextually.I read both,and The Spirit sometimes shows me errors,and that seems fine to me,just sayin.

[SEK4110]

@siftedby666 How kind of them to put the omissions in the footnotes. NIV away if you are led

[sinterminator]

Susan, I don't really understand the KJB always, because english is not my native language.

Which english bible is second best, behind the KJB, and written in contemporary english language ?

What about the American Standard Version ?