@thenicobustos You won't have the same question for 9. "Speed maths- Multiplying without multiplying". Click on my username and check the vid. Cheers.
I see a lot of people who are bagging on this method. First, to those who say it's the same as using the formula: This is a visual substitute that is better suited for those who learn by sight and shapes rather than numbers and memorization. As for using a calculator, there will be times when a calculator may not be present (not likely), but using a method such as this can also save you time if you practice it enough.
@allute For the best education to the people multiple paths towards knowledge must be made, a multi-culture of teaching methods. This mono-culture life-style that we live in today only allows for a minority to absorb information of importance. I love to see more & more methods being presented. This is why the Internet is so amazing! Like the body we need train to stay in shape, this applies to the mind as well. Even if not needed thanks to technology, it still is important to train the mind!
This has nothing to do with the mathematics of all this, but the music selection is great. I recognized it the minute I started the video. I love Planescape: Torment. That title needs to be carried further.
Honestly speaking, I feel it is time-consuming. This method is mostly only useful for those who don't know their basic times tables, and is extremely tedious when performing problems with larger numbers. (ie. 999 x 999) While it is still possible using this method it requires about half a page of paper if used efficiently.
This is the same as basic maths, just a little more complicated and slow and paper consuming. Consider 53 x 65 (ab x cd). its the same as saying (10.a+b) x (10.c+d) which results into a generic 100ac + 10(ad+bc) + bd. which is what the vides says us to do in a graphic manner which will be time and paper consuming once the digits are greater than 5.
Videos like these make the good ones difficult to find.
i am gonna practice that one :)
chaochao110711 17 hours ago
Japanese Style:)
fireintheskyofficial 1 day ago
i find this way to multiply easier.
TheStickcop95 6 days ago
omg this is so confusing
MegaShocker2471 1 week ago
now das legit
AubreeLuvzU 1 week ago
Im gonna need alot of paper
ladyLBPR 1 week ago
That takes to long..
juortiz85 1 week ago
Theres a reason why we have calculators
Tyahnaax3 1 week ago
Better than drawing all these lines I rather use old school method.
MrKrazygenius 2 weeks ago
this is how the Mayans would multiply no bullshit
annnaram1 2 weeks ago
vedic mathematics
abhishar8191 2 weeks ago
try 987 x 654. ugly
motleyfoolmania 2 weeks ago
This was so confusing... Try to find 133x432 and see what happen.
kael9403 2 weeks ago
OH MY GOD. I JUST LEARNED A NEW WAY TO MULTIPLY.
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!
IshDat1KiD 1 month ago
Very enjoyable thank you
shellybirdy 1 month ago
This is a great video
SuperDogbrown 1 month ago
very interesting video thanks
sprattysy 1 month ago
I Love The Video Amazing Math Multiplication Trick It Can Increase My Knowledge
anakmudajaman 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good, I like that you share this video Amazing Math Multiplication Trick , I wish success always
AntoMelta 1 month ago
Nice Video Amazing Math Multiplication Trick That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You
willamricard 1 month ago
I Really Like The Video Amazing Math Multiplication Trick From Your
imegatrone 1 month ago
Your Video Amazing Math Multiplication Trick Is Very Useful Sharing
bundawartini 1 month ago
342x751= ?? I cant figure this one out with this trick....please show me :)
angelitarg19881 2 months ago
and now calculate 9989 * 9989 !! ^^
bananenxmann 2 months ago
So nice its so nice to do now
lovemusikandyou 2 months ago
I just use a calculator ...
SebastianLondal 3 months ago
999x999=998001
wade9638 3 months ago
999 * 999
lookatmycommentplz 4 months ago
watched 3 video and i finally understood lol thanx:D
reilaL 4 months ago
how you multiply 29x36 like that??
thenicobustos 4 months ago
@thenicobustos You won't have the same question for 9. "Speed maths- Multiplying without multiplying". Click on my username and check the vid. Cheers.
awaqar 4 months ago
magic
33oleg33 4 months ago
calcul 999*897 with this method !!!
yoka547 5 months ago
AMAZING! THANKS!!!
2007frodo 5 months ago
@mindstorming101
Just play the video in the background.
rubiks15 5 months ago
I see a lot of people who are bagging on this method. First, to those who say it's the same as using the formula: This is a visual substitute that is better suited for those who learn by sight and shapes rather than numbers and memorization. As for using a calculator, there will be times when a calculator may not be present (not likely), but using a method such as this can also save you time if you practice it enough.
allute 6 months ago
@allute For the best education to the people multiple paths towards knowledge must be made, a multi-culture of teaching methods. This mono-culture life-style that we live in today only allows for a minority to absorb information of importance. I love to see more & more methods being presented. This is why the Internet is so amazing! Like the body we need train to stay in shape, this applies to the mind as well. Even if not needed thanks to technology, it still is important to train the mind!
FlashySenap 6 months ago
@allute It was a long reply to simply say that I agree with you =)
FlashySenap 6 months ago
your using small numbers... how about big numbers?
poofkaboom 6 months ago
Hmm what about buying a calculator, or using the one in your computer instead of wasting your time?
MisterCyberPhantom 7 months ago
have fun if our exercise 99x99 or other higher numbers as 4 xD
PrinzHorst 7 months ago
i dont get it :(
and what if its a bigger number, ive noticed its just 2's and 3's and 1's..
RainbowsAndVampires 8 months ago
ohhhh now i get it!
sweetnsour44735 9 months ago
this makes me laugh.
kids dont be lazy, work out all your math.
cooliokats 10 months ago
terrrible
lattice is so much easier thn wtf is this
bombersondeck 10 months ago
terrrible
bombersondeck 10 months ago
This has nothing to do with the mathematics of all this, but the music selection is great. I recognized it the minute I started the video. I love Planescape: Torment. That title needs to be carried further.
josh4974Seipher 1 year ago
thanks for the cool ti[ on multiplacation
.
.]
lovehate64 1 year ago
try solving 1002 X 503 with that crossing method!
shimesaoshi 1 year ago 4
@shimesaoshi that is actually easy. 99x99 would be a bitch though
DjWth2 8 months ago
what if u have to multiply 999 * 999 ?? happy drawing ...
phtmexplo 1 year ago 3
@phtmexplo multiply 999 x 1000 and subtract 999 =D You don't even need to draw!
Happy thinking XD
I2USSIAN 1 year ago
@I2USSIAN I meant if he needed to draw it ofc ... how about 764 * 439 then?
phtmexplo 1 year ago
123 x 221=27183....you are wrong!!
davegrohl96 1 year ago
@davegrohl96 its 132 not 123
fabio122123 1 year ago
@davegrohl96 Uhhh... it was actually 132. not 123. hes CORRECT.
ThePotterman10 1 year ago
Interesting~
shmmts 1 year ago
lol your smart!
Zacky590 1 year ago
i whant to see a video with 96 x 79 =))
allexxxino 2 years ago
doesn't work for certain numbers.
tugafighter 2 years ago
doesn't really work with 0's does it?
HovX51 2 years ago
How about the 0?!
iluvehd 2 years ago
@iluvehd if ya dont know zero's ur stupid...or do u mean 0 or a # with zero like 120?
fabio122123 1 year ago
how do you now witch to add together??
AAVSAA 2 years ago
Honestly speaking, I feel it is time-consuming. This method is mostly only useful for those who don't know their basic times tables, and is extremely tedious when performing problems with larger numbers. (ie. 999 x 999) While it is still possible using this method it requires about half a page of paper if used efficiently.
licianinh 2 years ago
cool! I'll keep that in mind
castq3 2 years ago
kewl!!!!
xinia103 2 years ago
it goes well with numbers under 5,above that it is too much work to count all the crossings
thehumandidge 2 years ago
u love math :)
N11Ckk123472 3 years ago
This is the same as basic maths, just a little more complicated and slow and paper consuming. Consider 53 x 65 (ab x cd). its the same as saying (10.a+b) x (10.c+d) which results into a generic 100ac + 10(ad+bc) + bd. which is what the vides says us to do in a graphic manner which will be time and paper consuming once the digits are greater than 5.
Videos like these make the good ones difficult to find.
nirajha 3 years ago 19
@nirajha ???
jabbeXD 1 year ago
you are making it more complecated
7oota2007 3 years ago 24
lool you're soooo right !
piannelly 3 years ago
@7oota2007 try calculating it your self then. without a calculator
DjWth2 8 months ago
@7oota2007 Thats why its called a TRICK it doesn't say "how to solve multiplication faster."
Mochoman9911 2 months ago
i do 9865x7849
pack666norris 3 years ago 2
try this! 9865x7849
DuangJai99 3 years ago