Added: 3 years ago
From: g3n3r1cu53r
Views: 63,217
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (441)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Hairspray is gonna destroy Ozone!!???"

    Yep, clearly all the scientists are lying.

  • Donahue is awesome. Called Limbaugh on his BS immediately.

  • Guess what Donahue? You didn't convince me. There are countries that would fit your life style just fine. They're over in Europe. Move there.

  • Don't bother trying to reason with vince3xx. He's a bigot and an idiot. If you want to know his views, go watch and/or listen to Dr. David Duke and other right-wing hate websites. He will try to convince you he's educated and is well read, but the truth is all his knowledge is from YouTube videos and hate websites.

  • If you want to know what vince33x thinks, all you have to do is look up Dr. David Duke. He preaches everything he says. He's a biggot and a moron. He'll try to make you believe he's educated, but all his education is from YouTube videos and hate websites.

  • Weapons come in many forms! We cannot encourage people to make wrong choices by giving them resources to promote wrong choices! Safe sex does not really exist? God's view is sex between a married man and woman. Let us do it God's way and we do not have to suffer the dire consequences of doing it our way! Thankyou. James Sasse.

  • Dimmy's IQ is about that of a 5th grader.

  • Funny to hear Dimbulb talking about the risks of sex. I'm sure one of the main risks he faces is having to pay too much for it. Big fat blimp.

  • Limbaugh is and idiot beyond comprehension.

  • What is the book called?

  • The absolute best discussion of Rush Limbaugh's place in American culture was provided by Bill Hicks. It's on You Tube. Look it up.

    ____

    And what is Russ Limp-dick doing discussing condom use? He clearly has no need for one.

    ___

    Can anyone imagine Russ naked doing the nasty? Eeeeew! How fucking gross is that?

    What kind of monster woman would fall in love with a gross tub of lard like him?

    ___

    Anyway, if you haven't already seen it, look up the Bill Hicks bit. It's classic.

  • I wonder if Limbaugh would acknowledge or even try to make the arguments he was in this interview. In my guess, due to his arrogance and him being a total and utter douchebag, he would remain an ignorant a**hole. I find that in itself pretty humorous.

  • Limbaugh is fat ass, pill popping douche bag. That much is certain.

  • Pozner's performance here really holds up through the years. He's sharp and way over this drugged out fucktard's head. Limbaugh somehow seems stupider even here. His audience must have been herded in.

  • so he had a program on the liberal media place then....so does that mean the media is not that liberal biast......or did he not care or something

  • Rush Limbaugh was an idiot then, and he's still an idiot today.

  • Rush was full of shit then and still is today.

  • If only we had people to counter Limbaugh's bullshit. Now we have Fox news, which sends out Limbaugh's kind of propaganda nonstop without anyone to counter.

  • "Fox news sends out Limbaugh's propaganda nonstop without anyone to counter." Thank the senile assfucker Ronald Reagan's repeal of the Fairness Doctrine for the horror that is the US media today. The Fairness Doctrine was an FCC ruling requiring all broadcasters to air opposing views: No Fairness Doctrine = no opposing views required. Right-wing whackos began appearing on radio & television directly after Reagan's repeal, their opinions & assertions completely & entirely unnopposed.

  • @bapyou Yes the FCC deciding what is Fair. I love it

  • @sgsfdgfsdfsdfsddf So, u like Fascism.

  • @vince33x "incentive pay for the chief executive officers of 50 major corporations jumped 30% in 2010. That's on top of their base pay. And it also doesn't include a whole bunch of other things, like generous retirement packages, gold-plated healthcare plans and use of the corporate jets."

    Executives were some of the people who nearly destroyed the global economy, and now they continue plundering us all. They don't earn their wealth, they steal it.

  • @spartan2600 So what! How does that effect u. Former ExxonMobil chief, Lee Raymond was given a $400 Million Dollar retirement pkg. Of course the Jews Media smeared this all over the airwaves w/out giving any context at all because they wanted to anger their viewers (I guess this kind of reporting works with u?) .

    Well, Lee Raymond's decisions while he was chief at ExxonMobil increased its market value by MORE THAN $100 Billion Dollars, that's 2,500x more than he got for retirement.

    Think!!!

  • @vince33x

    It is not hard to increase your market value when your Exxon Mobil. Demand for gas is constantly rising, so as demand rises so does price.

    Seems like a simple equation eh!

  • @KroniklyCanuck Of course, if it were as easy as all that, you'd be doing it...eh?

  • @vince33x "Of course the Jews Media..."

    Didn't realize I was talking to an antisemite until now. Fuck off Nazi.

  • @spartan2600 we do Spartan, Check out "The young Turks" on youtube.. they are blowing up with over 250 million views and appearances on NBC and other TV outlets.

  • @MuntaserMajthoub The Left-Wing media helping other Left-Wing media outlets...what a surprise!

  • @spartan2600 The Left just hates the fact that other POVs r being heard. They're not used 2 that & it really pisses them off.

  • @vince33x I hate the fact that billionaires are paying Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Hannity, etc. to voice the Billionaire's POV. The media should be controlled democratically, not by the ultra-rich.

  • @spartan2600 So u r a socialist, which is another way of saying u r a communist, which is another way of saying u r a moron, because u believe in economic systems that lead to poverty & misery for all.

    What a nitwit u r. U could be president!

  • @vince33x I'm saying we shouldn't be propagandized by billionaires. If that makes me a communist, I don't care. Every other industrialized nation in the world, from Australia to Britain to Sweden to Canada to New Zealand has publicly-funded, non-profit news services. Those countries aren't exactly communist. Nations like Sweden have the highest science literacy rates in the world, but the US has one of the worst in the OECD, next to Turkey.

  • @spartan2600 If every other nation were slaughtering Jews because of their wealth it wouldn't make it right, except in you warped mind. Gov't shouldn't b controlling the news - that's called Fascism u idiot!

    If u really want 2 improve USA schools - PRIVATIZE them.

  • @vince33x if you privatize schools, you will ruin them. Look at proprietary colleges. They only care about tuition and the students learn nothing.

  • @vince33x As I already mentioned, the worlds greatest education systems in the world are government-run, like in Finland, France, Japan and so on. If you think all those places are "Fascist," grow up and stop exploiting those words in order to use them as insults.

    If you bring up Jewish genocide to try to make a point about the media, you've lost and proven you're a lunatic.

  • @spartan2600 I luv u morons on the Left. You're always saying your for "choice" but it turns out you're only for choice when it comes to killing infants but not for parental choice when it comes to schooling. You guys are all phonies.

    You say: "the worlds greatest education systems in the world are government-run, like in Finland, France, Japan"

    90% of USA kids K - 12 go to gov't schools & we suck, so what gives?

  • @vince33x The difference is that child poverty and child malnutrition are through the roof in the United States due to our skeletal welfare system. Also, the US is the most overworked industrial nation in the world, so parents just can't raise their children when they have to work 60 hours a week just to put food on the table. When children are raised by television because their parents are forced to work by their greedy bosses, children tend to get ADD and can't adjust to school.

  • @spartan2600 What a croc! The poorest children in the USA have the biggest problem w/Obesity! "Skeletal welfare system"??? The Fed Gov't is going to spend $3.7 Trillion this year - 2/3 of that is transfer payments from person A to person B. If gov't didn't steal so much, our economy would be more vibrant. Americans r free to work more or less if they wish. Do u think gov't should dictate agreements made between employees & employers?

    U definitiely sound as though u were raised by TV...PBS.

  • @vince33x Vince said: "The poorest children in the USA have the biggest problem w/Obesity! " You're assuming that obese poor kids have weight problems because they're eating well & in great quantities. Not so. The quality of nutrition thats economically available to the poor is very low, containing high amounts of fat, cholesterol & sugars. Nutritious foods like fresh meats & veggies are much less affordable & better education is needed to teach people proper dietary habits.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin U r so full of crap! The number of people on food stamps has exploded. If they're buying crap w/those stamps who's fault is that? U & ur moron friends don't want 2 b free. U want a nanny state to hold ur hand 4 your whole lives. I have 2 agree, people like u shouldn't b free. U need 2 b in a sustainable environment, like say, a...Gulag.

  • @vince33x If you had any idea how bad conditions in gulag camps were, you wouldn't wish that fate on anyone, no matter how much you disagree with them. Not the sort of thing Jesus would wish on someone, is it?

  • @ErasmusBDraghin Don't tell me ur offended by a little sarcasm. From what I've read from others, if ur that thin-skinned u shouldn't b here.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin BTW, have u bn in a gulag? R u implying that?

  • @vince33x I lived & studied in Russia & had opportunity 2 meet 2 gulag survivors, as well as relatives who lived thru Stalin's purges. And yes, I've been to old camps outside of Monino & Krasnoyarsk.

    It's strange. U employ the same, crazed hyperbole & dogmatic fervor that the truest of true believers in Communism used - only to the opposite end - and U don't even realize it.

    BTW - there was only 1 GULAG consisting of many camps & prisons. GULAG is a Russian acronym.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin It's interesting to note the countries that have needed gulags & concentration camps have been Socialist or Fascist [which, as Hayek observed, was the last stop b4 socialism].

    There r only 2 legitimate functions of gov't: 1) defense of the shores & 2) securing & protecting Individual Rights.

    Whenever gov'ts go beyond these boundaries, they have forfeited their legitimacy.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin U sound like a damn PBS Special. Isn't time 4 people 2 take responsibility 4 their own lives or do u think gov't should b responsible 4 everything, in other words totalitarianism.

  • @vince33x You're an angry, boorish person obsessed with violence, punishment and death. I'm tired of your ignorance, distortions and insults. Peace be with you - someday, I hope.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin At least I'm not a socialist, which is the worst thing anyone can b given the level of mass murder it has led to. It is the most heinous idea man has ever conceived. As C.S. Lewis observed: ""Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated;

  • @vince33x You are simply one, big cognitive dissonance, aren't you? You obsess about theft, esp by gov'ts, and how it's never right, but then turn around & quote Lewis to proclaim you'd be OK w/ living under the boot of cruel robber barons. And here again, your blind hypocrisy. U don't see that you're a moralizing busybody, tormenting others w/o end because u have the approval of your own conscience - a conscience that's tells u your insults & moral hyperbole are all for the greater good.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin U obviously miss Lewis' point.

  • @vince33x I get Lewis's point. He'd rather be a rich man's serf, taking whatever wage or abuse granted him, than live in a moralistically oppressive society. It's not much of a choice, really.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin Lewis' point is that it is the "do-gooders" & the busybodies who have been responsible 4 the greatest tyrannies witnessed by man & most of the time these tyrannies resulted from a lazy populace.

    The price of Liberty is eternal vigilance as TJ observed.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."

  • @vince33x Also, US education is not worse in absolute terms. Children are about as smart as they were 40 years ago. The thing is that we are standing still while other nations move onwards and upwards.

    Finnish parents work the equivalent of several MONTHS less than their American counterparts. This gives Finnish parents time and energy to read to their children, help with schoolwork, bond with children.

    The rich are robbing us of our childhoods and educations.

  • @spartan2600 Absolutely right. It's amazing how northern Europeans have at least an equivalent quality of life as we do here in the States, but manage to achieve it with far less stress, illness and anger.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin And yet they have very, very few natural or strategic resources. The only right-wing response I've seen is that somehow Scandinavia is still resting on the laurels its free market generated in the 19th century! As if they're still running wood-fired trains and using steam-powered machinery!

  • @spartan2600 A large part of it is Europe pays for hardly any of its defenses [they pay about 1% of their GDPs for defense while the USA pays 4% of its GDP - I'd say the time has come for the USA to get out of NATO - then we'll see how Russia reacts to a re-armed Germany!]. Be careful for what u wish for!

  • @vince33x We'll see how Russia reacts to a re-armed Germany? WTH are you talking about?

    You have to catch up on current events, fella. Hint: Russia is no longer part of the USSR and is not a communist state.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin Just what the heck do u think would happen if we no longer paid the Lion's share of Euro defense? Personally, I think we should get out of NATO - we could cut our defense spending by about $200B. U think Russia is so benign that Germany wouldn't re-arm itself? R u kidding me?

    Same goes for Japan, I think we should pull out of Japan [& Korea}, where we have bases & 67,000 troops [incl Korea] - that would save us another $100B. But Japan would certainly re-arm.

  • @vince33x Getting out of Iraq and Afghanistan would cut more from defense spending than divesting from NATO.

    Obviously you're not aware, but Germany and Japan are already "armed," as you put it. Both countries have standing, active military forces - Germany w/ ~90K active & Japan w/ ~240K active.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin U r unbelievably naive. The tension between Japan & China 4 hegemony in Asia goes bk 100s if not 1000s of years. Right now Jpan spends barely 1% of her $4.4Trillion GDP on defense because it relies on the USA 4 the bulk of its defenses. U take that away & I assure u Japan will b spending 2% to 3% of its GDP on defense. The same is true w/Germany. if Germany was sure it wouldn't have a "Western Front", wow, the imagination runs wild w/what could happen. Just why do u think

  • @ErasmusBDraghin there's been peace in Europe [putting a few skirmishes aside] 4 the past 66 yrs?

  • @ErasmusBDraghin I'm totally w/u on getting out of Iraq & Afghanistan. The former was a proxy war 4 Israel & I think American blood should never b spilled 4 Israeli interests. As 4 Afghanistan, we should have just used drones & special forces + intense pressure on Pakistan to get bin laden...we would have saved thousands of lives & a couple of Trillion dollars.

    Our intervention in WWI was largely responsible 4 WWII. We should trade w/most but defend only ourselves.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin The avg American, in terms of material well-being, lives far better than the avg. Euro.

  • @vince33x U sed: "The avg American...lives far better than the avg. Euro."

    Not true by a long stretch. By ur passport, (I know u don't have 1), & work up the courage to visit Germany, Norway, Sweden, Austria, Great Britain, Belgium - wherever (there r English speakers all over Europe). Don't just take Rush's & Fox News' word for it - go see for yourself. If you don't act like an arrogant ass, you might actually make some new friends, have some fun & learn something all at once.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin Whether or not I've been to Europe is not germane to the argument. The fact is, when u look at material well-being, the avg. American lives better than the avg. Euro. He has more home living space, he's far more likely to have central air & heat, he's more likely to have 2 to 3 vehicles + recreational products such as ATV's, ski mobiles, boats, etc., he's got a much bigger refrigerator + far more likely to have two ovens + a microwave & he's far more likely to have the latest

  • @vince33x Who needs 2-3 vehicles? You can only drive 1 @ a time. Everyone I know in Euro & Russia has central air, a microwave, an oven & flat screen TVs in home/apt. Homes/apts r just as comfy there as here. If someone's not into snowmobiling or ATVs, what use r they? BTW, I have friends there with both. Boats, motorcycles & a plane, too. A bigger fridge? Seriously? Ur basing affluence, wealth & quality of life on fridge size? LOL! You're just being ridiculous now.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin Just how r u going to measure wealth if not by material well-being?

  • @vince33x "Material well-being" is just another way of saying "I have stuff that I think makes me happy/important." More stuff doesn't = higher quality of life, it just means u have more stuff.

    I measure my wealth by the experiences I've had, the people I've met & keep as friends all around the world, my health, my education & job that's allowed me to explore as much of the planet as I have, my family. These r important, not ATVs & big fridges. LOL! Still can't get over that u sed that!

  • @ErasmusBDraghin U can't measure "feelings" but u can measure material well-being. I can't tell how u feel about ur dog but I can tell what color it is and how big it is, as these r "objective" measures.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin flat-panel TV. The avg. poor person in the USA lives as well as the avg. middle class European.

  • @spartan2600 Why does the private sector move forward at an amazing rate yet gov't run entities stagnate: Amtrak, Gov't schools, USPS [which lost $8 billion of the taxpayer's money last year!]. The biggest problem w/USA education is gov't teacher's unions who fight any meaningful change w/a vengeance because they're on such a taxpayer funded gravy train. I luv how they site studies fr groups like the CEP [which r just fancy sounding groups set up to provide justification 4 the gov't system].

  • @spartan2600 It's such a shell game & of course, most taxpayers aren't paying attention so they're not aware of how much gov't unions r screwing them!

  • @spartan2600 I know gov't is stealing from us, because that's what gov'ts do. But how are the "rich" stealing from u? I want specifics, just how are the rich stealing from u? The top 25% of income earners in the USA pay 86.34% of all Federal Taxes; the bottom 50% of income earners pay just 2.7% of all Federal Taxes. Now tell me again, how are the rich stealing from u?

  • @vince33x You continually argue that the "rich" pay 80% of the taxes in America, but you ignore that the wage disparity in this country is higher than it's ever been. When corp execs make an avg of 400% more than avg workers and have a 2/3 greater income growth per year than everyone else, why shouldn't they pay more? With more equitable distribution of wealth, the mid class & poor can pay more in taxes. That's elementary econ.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin And u propose what means 2 correct this? How do u think we should get 2 "more equitable distribution of wealth" BTW, sound very Marxist.

    Then u say: "the mid class & poor can pay more in taxes." What?! I don't want anybody 2 pay more in taxes; I want everyone 2 pay a whole lot less in taxes. Gov't at al levels [Federal, State, & Local] is far too bloated and needs 2 b cut w/a chainsaw not a scalpel. No gov't should ever account 4 more than 10% of a nation's GDP.

  • @vince33x According to a study from UC Berkeley, "52% of all US GDP growth from 1993-2008 captured by the top 1% of the income scale." The Economist also has a great writeup on the piece.

  • @spartan2600 So, put another way, 48% of the GDP growth was captured by the other 99%. OK, well, during that period, GDP grew by $3.353 Trillion Dollars, so the top 1% captured $1.744 Trillion Dollars & the rest captured $1.609 Trillion Dollars. And your problem is what?

    Did u ever stop 2 think w/out the 1% - the folks that take the economic risk - that there is no increase of $3.353 Trillion Dollars?

    Also, UCal Berkeley is on of the most Left-Wing institutions in the USA. Something 2 consider.

  • @vince33x Anyone smarter than you is left-wing. Nice way of justifying your ignorance.

  • @vince33x The fact that the rich pay such a large share of taxes isn't proof that they give up a lot, or that we're egalitarian. You can find the same exact numbers in any banana-republic where a handful of people own the country. The fact that they rich pay a larger share in taxes is a symptom of the fact that they have all the money, and the working class and poor have next to nothing. The fact that the rich have so much money in the first place- that is what is stolen.

  • @spartan2600 I don't give a damn about being egalitarian, where did u get that idea. I do believe those earn the money should keep the lion's share of it and not have gov't steal 50% of it just because some scum politician can convince 50% + 1 to vote for him because he's promised to steal from someone else to benefit the scum who voted for him.

    BTW, define wealth? What is money? How is wealth created? If u can't answer these Q's u shouldn't b talking about it.

  • @vince33x Whether or not you've been to Europe, or anywhere outside the US, is completely germane to the discussion. You fear, criticize, denigrate & pass judgment on everyone different from you & their way/quality of life w/o actually having seen or experienced how they live. You assume that everyone wants what you think you want. They don't.

    Buy a passport & go to Europe and THEN come back & lash out @ everyone. At least that way you'll have an informed, intelligent opinion. Now? Not so much.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin My dim friend, u r the one lashing out...read ur posts...ur an angry little boy.

  • @vince33x If you read anger in my posts it's because you projected it there. I do get frustrated by attitudes such as yours - boorish, fearful, dogmatic, willfully ignorant - and it concerns me that there's seems to be so much of it going around these days. But, you don't have the power to anger me, even with all of your name calling, bullying & lashing out at everything you don't understand. Participating in this further is unhealthy. Good luck.

  • @ErasmusBDraghin What I do fear is that morons r allowed to vote and that is primarily why we continue to elect morons. When morons vote morons get elected.

  • @vince33x I think any person concerned with morality and/or democracy should care greatly about egalitarianism. Democracy gains as a population becomes more egalitarian. Democracy diminishes as a small group of people commandeer a larger relative share of wealth and control of the economy.

    The people on Wall Street and other billionaires "earned" their money in the same way Suharto or Mubarak "earned" it- by stealing and exploiting.

    I believe in the labor theory of value.

  • @spartan2600 Well, 1st of all, the "labor theory of value" is absolute nonsense and this is easily demonstrated: the 4 key elements of production are, in order of importance: 1) Management, 2) Capital, 3) Resource, 4) Labor.

    Labor is easily substituted for with capital. E.g.> robotic welders replacing human welders in auto plants. The most important element of production is Management. Management is the: Idea, the Organization, the Process Control & the Implementation. Without Management, there

  • @vince33x robotic welders don't generate profit, or surplus value though. Capital, resources and labor are all important aspects of production, but it is asinine to claim that "management" is the most important part. There is no management in coops. Management is an invention of the capitalist system, not some innate, fundamental requirement of all production.

    I live across a bakery in Madison Wisconsin that destroys your entire economic worldview- they have no management.

  • @spartan2600 U obviously haven't a clue what management means. There's no point having a discussion w/an idiot.

  • @spartan2600 is NO PRODUCTION. Capital is the 2nd most important element of production because it represents BOTH the Plant & Equipment as well as the financing. 3rd most important element is Resource. It ranks 3rd because it can be substituted: E.g.> U can substitute materials such as steel for aluminum, margarine for butter, etc. Labor is the least important because it is easily substituted for by capital & when it is substituted for by capital, the capital never gets sick, is never hungover,

  • @spartan2600 never complains, can be programmed to do new tasks quickly & accurately, never organizes for the purposes of disrupting production. Every business that wishes to compete tries to get as much labor out of its production process as possible.

    Sorry to burst ur bubble.

  • @spartan2600 So, u think it's moral 4 the majority 2 vote in politicians who will steal from the minority? That's ur idea of morality? May I suggest a more careful reading of the TEN COMMANDMENTS, especially Commandments 8 (Thou shalt not steal), 9 (Thou shalt not bear false witness) & 10 (Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's goods).

    Please tell me how people on Wall Street steal from u?

  • @vince33x Workers are the majority, so getting politicians in to tax the rich to pay for the working class is absolutely moral. It is the rich who stole in the first place- that's why they're rich. Taxing them is simply taking back what always belonged to the workers.

  • @spartan2600 So, the majority can vote themselves anything? Is that your view of democracy? Since Jews r, by far, the richest group in the USA, can the majority "vote" to confiscate Jewish wealth, after all, in ur sick world view, they obviously stole it. R there any limits on what the "majority" can vote themselves. There's a word for ur view of "majority rule." It's called Fascism.

  • @spartan2600 Ur words: " Taxing them is simply taking back what always belonged to the workers." Well put, as u said: "Taking" u obviously believe theft is OK as long as the "majority" vote for it. So, is there any limit on what the "majority" can vote for itself?

  • @vince33x When I work, the product of what I produce is not mine, I do not determine for how much it is sold for, how it is sold, where it is sold or who it is sold to. Everything I produce is stolen, and my boss pays me a stipend so I can survive in order to keep enriching him. Its the same with Wall Street investors. They don't just steal what I produce, they steal my life by determining how I live, when I work, how I work, when I'm allowed to eat my lunch, when I can urinate, etc.

  • @spartan2600 So, if I borrow $250K to build a house & I hire u to frame it at, say, $18/hr, ur saying that u then "own" the house. Under what insane philosophy does that work?

    Similarly, Henry Ford attracts enough investors to incorporate Ford Motor Co. He uses these funds to build a factory, a design studio, an engineering dept., and a purchasing dept. Then he hires labor to put pieces together that for a vehicle. Ur saying those laborers "own" the vehicle they put a suspension piece or

  • @vince33xThat's an interesting question, my guess is that under conditions that he is invisioning there would be private property (so the house would remain yours) but their would be no private industry, so no Ford auto plant. Also conditions that your hypothetical frame layer would work under would be drastically different from his Ford autoplant counterparts. Your frame layer would have a much wider range of freedom due to a lack of any kind of managerial hierarchy.

  • @garth813 I'm not sure who u r referencing here. There r so many idiots on these responses. What do u mean by "conditions that your hypothetical frame layer would work under would be drastically different from his Ford autoplant counterparts."

    If ur talking about one of these union idiots, they have no clue as to how or why enterprises get started. These r the entities that destroy great countries: #1, Gov't, 2. Gov't Schools, 3. Unions, 4. Media & Popular culture - they all embrace Left-Wing

  • @garth813 thought, which is essentially socialist. Finally, I have no idea what u mean when u say: "Your frame layer would have a much wider range of freedom due to a lack of any kind of managerial hierarchy." I have no idea what u mean by that sentence.

  • @spartan2600 or steering rack on. Is that what ur saying? Please explain this concept.

  • Rush is the master of circular logic, I counted 32 times that he lost his train of thought (most have something to do with him being a pill popper).

  • rush drug using limbaugh is a cunt

  • @danteharris268 Always nice 2 hear from the rational & coherent.

  • @danteharris268 Do ur feminists friend approve of such language?

  • Rush is a genius, he understood that America is full of morons, he figured it out a long time ago. He's just saying what ever morons like to hear, black people steal, Mexicans are taking are jobs (dey took r jurbs), liberals are evil, in fact it's pretty easy even I could do it, but I have a soul and a conscious so I can't.

  • @coffee396 Thank you, coffee. I'd like to see pigboy go out in public and tell strangers that they hate their country! Maybe we'd get to see a what a real personal attack is.

  • (dey toorksrejsdfhsdhsf) haha RUsh is a fucking idiot that cannot be civil and is a hate speaker thats all he does he does not have any valid argument to back up what he says

  • Rush is an genius..... he make 35 million as an hitman for big corporation and repuliscums who doesn't give an sht about your average American,, they only have two agendas

    save tax for the riches..

    deregulate more rules for big corporation ..

    this is why we are in where we are today.. you dump fk..

  • I absolutely agree with you 100%, I don't think you red my message because from what I see you and I have the same opinion.

  • Sorry again pal.. We all need to stand up and crush these spineless Repuliscums.. pls you are very welcome to join my favorite..

  • @superwhiz88 The wealthiest 1 percent of the population earn 19 per cent of the income but pay 37 percent of the income tax. The top 10 percent pay 68 percent of the tab. Meanwhile, the bottom 50 percent—those below the median income level—now earn 13 percent of the income but pay just 3 percent of the taxes.

    Need any more proof that u r at once a moron & a-hole.

  • @coffee396 I agree, Americans, as Bill Maher said: "r stupid." But I've never heard Rush say: "Black people steal" or "Mexicans r taking our jobs..." So it's clear u r a liar. Which IS PROOF that Liberals r EVIL.

    Thanks 4 helping us 2 understand.

  • @coffee396 Speaking of filled w/morons, 53% of the American electorate voted 4 a nitwit based on the campaign slogan: "Hope & Change."

    Liberalism is the belief system of morons.

  • What a fucking hypocrite this man is, he bashes gays and he solicited a gay man for sex back in the late 70's, he's intolerant with drug users but he's a drug addict, what's next ? He hates fat people ? I think this guy hates himself more than anyone els.

  • shit i don't understand american language((

  • do you understand English ?

  • yes but not american

  • блин аннотации будут с русским переводом?

  • @Wassamata

    Translation.

  • at least rus annotations ....

  • Umm. Maybe we shouldn't give guns to cops, or even tasers for that matter. Especially if you're riding on the Bart. Plus I'm sure we're going to listen to someone who wishes someone would get robbed and their wife get raped simply because they idea agree with their viewpoints. Still wonder why they call Rush's followers nutjobs?

  • Wow, Rush is a total moron.

  • what the fuck..

  • Limbaugh is using dishonesty and deception in his line of arguments?? What a shock! Limbaugh's WHOLE shtick is a fraud. Rush is a mouthpiece for the very wealthy in the US.: Big Corporations, Big Insurance, Big Defense, Big Banks. etc. BUT: Limbaugh can't come right out and say that. Rush has to disguise his motives under cover of "what's best for the average joe/jane". Note how when Rush gets questioned by a REAL journalist, Rush has to backtrack? Limbaugh can NOT hold up under honest scrutiny.

  • Phil Donahue was one of the dumbbestttttt POS ever on TV, he acted like he knows everything with his fake compassion and sympathy, only if you ever listen to what he says, then you will know he has no common sense nor logic. I hope Phil Donahue gets robbed and his wife gets raped while he still waiting for police to show up someday!

  • I can not believe that Phil Donahue just said that a gun is "not protection". Shit I feel pretty protected with my fire arms. Plus in some neighborhoods a gun could actually protect a kid better than a condom. You ever been to South Central LA?

  • id like to shove my dick in your mouth and shut you up before i beat your ass

  • LOL! Dude, do you realize that other people can read that shit. Bitch, GO BACK TO FUCKING PRISON! Why they let parasites like you out, I will never know. You clearly have some Male on Male shit to take care of. Well, this guy aint into that. That was not even hard, it was more gay than anything. I am sorry to break your heart Nancy.

  • Typical liberal mentality to think that the only thing you could possibly do with a gun is to murder someone. Guess we shouldn't give guns to cops either.

  • I think that is step 2, in the 12 step race toward tyranny.

    I was reading the paper the other day, and a women murdered her husband with a spoon. I guess we need to blame the spoon and not the psycho using it. Damn our logical ways...

    A check out the Nazi Weapons Ban of 1938 and Hurrican Katrina Gun Ban, two really good reads.

  • @thomasw78 Dat's cause his daddy was pimpin his momma!

    BTW, I'd luv 2 c the cops unarmed. Most r just unionized, jack-booted, gov't thugs.

  • Posner is the agent of influence in Russia. His futher was o commie, i think

    thats why he left usa

    by the way Brooklin was a center of bolshevik revolution

  • explain that please

  • liberals get so mad when republicans try to teach morals!!!!!! liberals make me sick

  • Indeed. And your mother should suck a tramp's asshole before being drowned in his shit.

  • You've got to hand it to Limbaugh - even though he has perhaps the most right-wing extremist views in non-professional politics, he doesn't yell out, shout at the top of his lungs, yell over the opponents side, and at like a fucking fool in *this* particular debate as Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly does. What a couple of faggots. I don't like Rush either, but seeing him be a good sport makes me actually want to listen to him for once and listen to his argument. Too bad his radioshow isnt like it

  • The problem with a fascist vs. a commie is that you just get Hitler vs. Stalin-- they're both wing-nut stooges who just want to rule everyone, and are simply arguing over who gets to rule.

  • i have never seen so many pathetic left wing pussies, on a site before. All the brainwashed liberal fags on here from this country and else where, its embarrsing......get a life you left wing pussies!

  • got one you right wing cocksukker..!

  • Donahue / Pozner, two commies in the same tea cup. The cup is the distruction of the USA! And then add God to the mix, oh brother. Two commies talking about God is like saying abortion is not killing children. Oh well, just to see the word GOD come off the lips of these two comies was priceless!

  • It's funny that you call Pozner a commie, because in Russia he is often seen as a pro-American traitor. In reality, he is just a wise man above most of the Western and Russian uneducated rednecks :-)

  • @alexandril my god! You're one of a rare man today - who shares his wisdom..:)

  • @alexandril - Hear, hear!

  • @alexandril Pozner is correct. Children are going to have sex. Adults cannot stop it. Its life right or wrong.

  • @jimbobubbadj What a moron, just because u can never end murder doesn't mean u stop trying to discourage it.

  • @vince33x Are murder and sex the same thing? Which one is more cost effective to try to stop my friend?

  • @jimbobubbadj It's ur logic that's flawed. Just because we're all gonna die doesn't mean u stop trying to take care of urself.

    Re: costs, children born to single mothers have much higher crime rates, much higher rates of out-of-wedlock births themselves, so the costs become self-perpetuating.

    Ur attitude is because children r gonna engage in stupid behavior, we shouldn't try to limit it, is that it?

  • @vince33x One can try to limit teenage sex but the parent can only do so much. To address your point, yes they should try but not to the point that it is all consuming. Birth control and condoms would help to reduce unwanted pregnancies. Nothing is going to stop it.

  • @jimbobubbadj Nothing is going to stop teenagers from having sex.

  • @jimbobubbadj Well, the popular culture doesn't help when it lauds single motherhood. After all, the #1 predictor of future male violent behavior is being born into a single-mother household. So there's a very real connection to male out-of-wedlock births future violent crime.

    One thing 4 sure is our welfare laws ought discourage such behavior - not reward it, as they do now.

  • @vince33x I'm not a supporter of welfare, its work or starve. I'm against most social programs but some I am for. Social Security for US retired elderly citizens only, unemployment to about 2 years and universal single payer health care. I"d also go for no government involved in health at all but that means none for all. I'd scrape all the rest like food stamps, head start, wica, SSI, medicade, et al.

  • @jimbobubbadj The problem w/ur position is that everyone has their "pet" Federal program. We need 2 get 2 a point where people understand there is a legitimate role 4 gov't that is should not go beyond. And this goes worldwide not just the USA.

    Gov't should defend the shores, preserve public order, control the criminal element, promote a stable currency, enforce legal contracts, create a system to discharge debt, standardize weights & measures, protect Private Property Rights & Individual

  • @vince33x I'd rather have government on the light side than on the heavy side. The government must be consistent. They must stay out of my small business and out of my bedroom. They must spend lightly on social programs and lightly on the military.

  • @jimbobubbadj Politicians, like everyone else, act on their own self-interest - and that interest is to get re-elected. One of the ways politicians achieve this end is to create as much dependency as possible. If ur beholden to gov't 4 ur well-being, u r unlikely to unseat the guy providing 4 ur well-being. This is one reason most welfare recipients vote Democrat, they don't want 2 "bite the hand that feeds them." Welfare, food stamps, etc., r just a type of bribe to secure votes.

  • @jimbobubbadj Our Founders never expected that we would have troops in more than 97 countries around the globe. As Thomas Jefferson observed: "Commerce with all, antipathy towards none."

    Or John Quincy Adams: "Americans should b friends of Liberty everywhere; defenders only of our own."

    Our Founders firmly believed that when it came 2 international relations, we should mind our own business.

  • @jimbobubbadj Individual Liberties...and beyond those responsibilities, gov't should leave us the 'F' alone. To do all of these things would require about 3% of our GDP. Can u even begin to imagine how much more prosperous we would b as a nation if gov't only stole 3% of our GDP?

    In fact, 2 economists from the U of Dallas did a study on "what if our [Fed] gov't stuck only to those things ID'd by our Constitution. They estimated our GDP would b DOUBLE what it is today or $30 Trillion, dwarfing

  • @jimbobubbadj all the other economies in the world, including China.

    Free & Open markets, low tax rates, minimal regulation, & the protection of property rights r the one true path 2 prosperity on a grand scale.

    It amazes me how few people get this.

  • @vince33x If people want disability if or when th