Added: 5 years ago
From: DANEgerus
Views: 1,307
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • fox new$ here says the report from j.hopkins study group was from "what Iraqi's told them & & not a body count." When asked-the study teams (not just hopkins but all said they have proof of death certificates from over 80% of the familes- keep in mind so many were/are so poor that they could not afford any funeral- but just buried in the backyard (hence no certificate 4 many). But OVER 80% from all the study groups! When released dick cheney mumbled nervously, "it's only 30,000."

  • (bebe... thanks 4 understanding those points. Please understand that Fox new$ is going 2 take ANYTHING they can get- if it's some Iraqi's that R being helped, thus siding, then told 2 agree, fox will report 'that'. fix new$ is the 2nd youngest major news corp. yet has been caught not just being wrong far 2 many x's but lying in obviou$ ways over & over & then caught trying to cover them up. Did O'reilly appologize 4 his 'Malmedy' rant?

  • Oh yeah, Concerns for humanitarian issues...Bullshitter.

  • More Soros lies!!!

    MIT just released a report Soros paid for the lying study and now admits it was wrong and political motivated.

    ht*tp://patterico*com/2008/01/­12/soros-funded-half-of-the-la­ncet-study/

  • Did the Rwandan genocide occur? What about the one in Darfur? What about the one in DR Congo? You know, the ones that everyone accepts. Yeah you know, the ones that used some of same scientists using same method. That's right. The one that while the UK Govt. was rubishing it, its top MOD scientists were saying it was "robust" and scientifically sound. hmmm... you're just like David Irving the holocaust denier really aren't you

  • We still don't have exact figures of deaths from WWII, much less Rwanda, Darfur, Iraq, etc. ALL of the numbers are just estimates based on different reporting criteria.

  • It is sad that some of you will fall for anything Fox News Tells you. WHY do you think the repubs made it a 'law' that we are not allowed to show the number of Iraqi deaths on the News. (is it not news?) Again, WHY are the news channels NOT allowed?

  • No more than you fall for what dailyKos tells you. What law is it specifically that "disallows" the reportage of deaths from iraq? Please tell us.

  • bebeinpa- notice the word law we typed is in ' ' marks. Obvious (to most) it can not be made into a law- Just like the health in$urance co's can't really make their own 'laws'- but can make their own rules. When the heads of news corps are told specific orders - from the desk of the president- they have to be followed. Odd that this is the 1st war EVER where the non-american death #'s are NOT TO BE SHOWN. Only time ever. Mentioned in the movie "W" as well.

  • Fair enough on the first two points. However the rest is unconvincing.Any and all news outlets are free to go to Iraq to report and film whatever they will, without penalty from the White House. American media besides, has long been "squeamish" vis'a'vis bloodshed compared to foreign reporting. Think of the coverage in Latin America for instance. I know that GB has asked the media not to make a show of the fallen soldier's caskets coming into Dover AFB.

  • The AP put the civilian death toll at 16,000 in 2006. The Iraqi Body Count Project is more accurate: 60,500 in the last 4 years. 37% were due to attacks by American and coalition forces. The Hopkins report was based upon hearsay apparently and that doesn't count. Go figure. But the cowards and liars on the Left won't hear of it.

  • I read that only 9% of the deaths were due to airstrikes.

  • FOX is so full of it

  • The poster of this video doesn't realise that he/she is doing more damage to the administration by showing it than not showing it. I'd like more of what Casey said please - doesn't matter - I know what he said. Paraphrasing, "The number is too high, the number I saw was 50,000 some point in time but I forgot when I saw it" - Another sound scientific rebuttal from the top! How embarrassing?

  • Oh no - this video didn't come from Daily Kos or Democratic Underground, so it MUST be false. Those on the left will believe what they want to believe as long as it can be Bu$hitler McHaliburton's fault.

  • Out of curiosity, which study is it that your numbers, whatever they are, is based on? Perhaps the study that Bush pulls out of his ass???

  • Amen turcca. Thank God there is finally a news agency that tells the truth!

  • The truth or just what you want to hear?

  • Fox news, and faith is all you'll ever need!

  • that's brainwashin' for ya!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more