Re: The Primacy of Ontology

[Israe5l]

I am not sure one should trust "consciousness" too much. I personally like the Heideggerian Dasien better. The acute sense of concern about the meaning of Being. But then maybe this is all old hate to you. I person dies three times. One is this existentiell. I don't know where the other two death comes from(???)

[YourFuture2012]

I am very disturbed by the behaviour of many students, studying on the university, they tend to get very political correct.

Spiritual intuition, Imagination and fantasy are very important elements that NEEDS to be used to become a better thinker.

LOVE is a more powerfull effect, we NEED to make a lot of mistakes in our philosophy to become good PROFFESORS!!

[worldnative]

at times abound superlatives on occasion not a sound other moments demure ontology certainly uncertain to a certain (un)certainty uncomfortable unknowing where life leads (what it means) is joy compared to the monotony of knowing and so elapsed frustration is oiled by the elixir of laughter, learning, love running free

[Israe5l]

I must agree with you. The shift from epistemology to ontology is unavoidable. We got this mess of language. The only way to get out of it, is to drop the dualistic subject-object mentality. The subject-subject is a completely different ball game.

[otonanoC]

Fascinating material in this video. I'd like to see 5 thousand views here instead of 5 hundred.

[almafarag]

a question could be: whether

the co-evolution of

biology and

communication (technologies)

contributes to higher and higher levels of epistemological potential for actualizing ontology

[hyperseauton]

The very last point you mentioned, (anchoring in 3rd person):

I think dialogue is essentially exchanging firing patters of brains, knitting together ideas that need not to be connected in such manner. In no two dialogues or speakers these are the same, so there is friction. If the overall brainwave structure (or any classification you want to use) is overly similar, there is resonance regardless of the differences.

[hyperseauton]

more personal I think that yes, dialogue is wanting to connect, which is what instincts, will, consciousness does. Inclusiveness regardless of having similar artful patterns, like logic, worked out is a central theme of green as opposed to orange.

In 2nd tier exchange, differences are acknowledge since all participants are comfortably secured with bungee cords in bigmindheart; one might deflect but stays where one is in regard to the essential.

[hyperseauton]

I think boundless understanding is always formless. With the word comes the fall, the idyll is destroyed by something that is dual in its nature.

The probability of our ideas being sufficiently close to one another is mostly small and when we enter this zone this we know the uptake.

The thing is we still need structure to get to the zone or mostly the skeptic part is unsure of resonance, maybe future technologies are able to facilitate exchange without language

[hyperseauton]

excuse the reductionist orange drowse but only in this manner I felt to make the point in text.

[hyperseauton]

The technological thing watch?v=vGNvP75UYGE is disturbing and should be considered a long time before we implement it at all.

Other consciousness areas have not even nearly kept us with the technological perception.

[milkeddowncocobrown]

wow that was fucking crazy mad respect i dont know to many people that have the strength of mind to think and ask the questions that u did. Anyways i think our relationship with animals war a big part of our development due to a deeper understanding of life. Like dogs used to follow humans after they had killed something and eat what was left. And they would bark on attack anything that would try to come near them at night. So the way humans saw animals deeply changed. I could be wrong tho

[Professoranton]

This is just great. smart and useful. Some of the visual and "secondary orality" stuff toward the end we could haggle about. Wondeful stuff.

So much in Dewey's Experience and Nature, Please read.

[jogayot]

heh, i suppose you should have disagreed with proanton, then... i'm sure he would demmunition your feeble ramblings with pleasure. j/k

[peace97914101]

/wiki/Cetacean_intelligence

"Conclusions about the nature and magnitude of dolphin intelligence have not yet been reached. There are many different species of dolphin (see the cetacea article for a full list) and generalizations can be easily misapplied. There are only a select few cetacean species that have been tested and live up to the ideal of dolphin intelligence."

[peace97914101]

/wiki/U.S._Navy_Marine_Mammal_­Program

/wiki/Military_dolphin

Big questions to be asked. Big Questions indeed. Maybe we need to try and communicate with other species of life on these issues and get their input.

[peace97914101]

/wiki/Dolphin

"The family Delphinidae is the largest in the Cetacean order, and relatively recent: dolphins evolved about ten million years ago, during the Miocene. Dolphins are among the most intelligent animals and their often friendly appearance and seemingly playful attitude have made them popular in human culture."

[peace97914101]

Music is a moral law. It gives soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and charm and gaiety to life and to everything.

Plato

[HaleyMary]

That's interesting what you said about how the world creates in a spiritual way when people start to speak. It makes me think of mathematics and of what Egyptian glyphs and how they built the pyramids. The pyramids tell people so much about the skies and the stars and without those Egyptian spiritual beliefs back in the past about the stars, the geometry of the pyramids may not have been discovered at least not at the time.