Added: 4 years ago
From: paulagloria
Views: 8,102
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @josephortizgarcia Then why do black and Latino leaders back the wall Street phenomena of Obama's administration, while it's mostly white people that are trying to stop the Globalists and expose 9/11 as an inside job?

  • The white man is the devil, and the devil is a liar. Hotep.

  • this is a show of Tarpley's BLIND LOVE FOR FDR...how so you say???

    Research ONE NAME Endicott Peabody, nuff said.

  • @odin422 yes Webster has a blind spot in many things or serves us in the Great Work in another way. He takes people so far but be grateful that "nothing is wasted" and I learned a lot from him (true I had to unlearn some but hey it is the process)

  • @paulagloria he is a VAST resource and a sound one, a good Washington insider as well, but boy he loves FDR. Though he acknowledges that parts of the NEW DEAL were mistakes. i dont feel a big need to "Unlearn" his words just to put them in a perspective of a big FDR fan. Your work is AWESOME and im REALLY glad i found your channel about 2 weeks ago =-) Keep up showing us how deep the rabbit hole goes, and i shall continue to view it from "Through the Looking Glass" (Computer) =-P

    Health to you.

  • @odin422 I am more into the realities of the court room...consider this case when a smuggled tape was passed to me of a case that could change the marijuana prohibition that could lead to the cancer cure for all.

    watch?v=XiCMoJNx4ng

  • @paulagloria would love to hear the part two, did u ever upload it?

    thx again

  • @odin422 no I never did and I doubt I ever will...I have moved onto other things but you my point here about Webster's value...you want to see it!

    see nothing is wasted

  • @paulagloria well Tarpley was spot on about Obama being the new Carter, and i think you should interview Tarpley about WW2 which is never discussed truthfully enough.

  • @odin422 Holocaust Denier's Now Wife, Ingrid Rimland, interviewed in Toronto Canada 1998 watch?v=KR-0Fd7eaho

    this is the most radically different view of WWII that I have ever heard and the source is excellent...tell me what you think

  • @paulagloria seen it, very enlightening, makes me want the books! =-)

    too bad there isnt more media about this woman or story of the Mennonites...

  • PEARL HARBOR THE FUCKER MOVIE SHIT FUCKER CAME OUT THE SAME TIME 9/11 HAPPENED SO GOD JUST HAD THAT MOVIE COME OUT THE SAME TIME AS 9/11 NO REASON?

  • Tarpley is such a baller

  • Tarpley's historical knowledge is astounding; where is Part 2, this is striking!

  • Fantastic video, where is part 2?

  • answer the fuckiin question biitch

  • and what is the "fuckin" question, sir?

    -Paula Gloria

    (in another account while youtube has disabled this account for a show "Joe Friendly and Carl Person Want dope Legal - Hurricane Ike agrees")

  • Shut up Joe.

    Goose-stepping Nazi.

  • "So why did the japanese attack pearl harbour?, saying the US knew of the attack is one thing but the Japanese planned it and launched it, How about discussing that angle, What were their motives?."

    well what do you think?

  • don't you think starting a dialogue helps this problem of ignorance? Also a willingness to stay connected

  • Churchill hated his own mother because she was American? The British Empire did it? Get a grip. The Vatican's Jesuits conspired to attack pearl harbour.

  • then why would Webster not say so? Dean Loren would agree with what you are saying BTW

  • I don't know why Webster failed to mention that fact. Every murdering Communist and Fascist dictator during WWI & II were Jesuit puppets. Protestant Germany humiliated. Protestant Prussia wiped off the map. Protestant British Empire no more, Jews gassed en masse, and somewhere in the region of 60 million Orthodox Christians sent to their deaths in Siberia. It was a job well done for the Vatican and her Jesuit priests. Japan was H-Bombed because they regarded their Emperor as 'divine'.

  • "60 million Orthodox Christians sent to their deaths in Siberia."

    Where did you get that figure?

    "Every murdering Communist and Fascist dictator during WWI & II were Jesuit puppets."

    Explain.

  • can you put "go to" buttons as I can't relisten to all the comments I get...this was made over a year and a half ago

  • Love to. What's a "go to" button?

  • it is a new feature that YouTube has

    let me demonstrate. At 20:30 Webster explains how ship building was stopped....if it "takes" (sometimes it glitches) you should be able to click right on the 20:30

  • this seems to go to 20:15 but usually it goes right to the spot you indicate

  • I see.

    Well, it was the interview with this Dean on the phone, & Sabrina & Matt in the studio with you. I pointed out that Trinity was Anglican not Catholic, thus blowing Dean's theory of "Vatican control." Better known as Catholic scapegoating.

  • The figures are debateable. The fact that Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mussolini, etc were all Jesuit puppets, isn't debateable. Joseph Stalin for example, was trained in a Jesuit university. Communism (Bolshevism) and Fascism (Nazism) were both creations of the militant Jesuit Order. Anybody who has researched WWII may also have learned that Jesuit "priests"/Nazi nuclear physicits were on the ground in Japan orchestrating everything. They orchestrated the entire war.

  • "The fact that Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mussolini, etc were all Jesuit puppets, isn't debateable."

    Prove it.

    Stalin attended the Georgian Orthodox Seminary of Tiflis, not a Catholic school. Eastern Rite like the Serbians.

    "Communism (Bolshevism) and Fascism (Nazism) were both creations of the militant Jesuit Order."

    Prove it.

    "priests"/Nazi nuclear physicits were on the ground in Japan"

    Doing what?

  • Isn' that the guy who said the Vatican owned the land under the WTC because the property is controled by St Pauls Church?

    St Pauls ANGLICAN CHURCH? Which is headed by the QUEEN OF ENGLAND?

    Is Mr Loren a Catholic basher?

  • I have seen the unedited stuff and yes it is very good Have you seen spin? this guy is on target, not a bullseye but cose enough on history but his econ no way thanks for post

  • @

    Thestupidamericans: why do you have that youtube handle?

  • Paula... Please... More people like u!

    Here in Brazil people just don't understand what really goes on outta their (our) country!

    Thank u...

    PS: Please upload the other parts! Thank u

  • go to blipdottv to rabbitholecentral as it is too big a file for YouTube (and is better quality)

  • finally I got pt 2 and 3 up: blipDOTtv/file/382012

  • hello Paula, can you upload parts 2/3 on youtube just like you did part 1, thanx

  • @damouno: you tube won't take the entire file. you are a strict YouTube man? Don't you think it gets addictive?

  • Hello Paula, u can upload in several parts i think, separate parts 2 and 3 !! yes, I YAM A U-Tuber aka addict, oh well, hehe :) i also watch the rabbithole blip tv also. take care

  • i'm on vacation now....have you ever caught a live stream? we are having tech troubles but every once in a while wow! the unedited stuff is terrific.....

  • Great shows, PaulaGloria. Thanks for the education.

  • where's part 2?

  • gulp. I've still to post it.....there is also a part 3...anyone out there in NYC that can help us with video production?

  • @GK4848: blipDOTtv/file/382012

  • Webster is a clever guy and very well read. I like him a lot, but that doesn't mean I agree with everything he says. He is among other things a defender of Roosevelt, the New Deal and the Federal Reserve...

  • I think he is trying to keep the system together and work it towards something better. When ppl throw out the money system (as HAS been done in history repeatedly) there is Civil War

  • Dude, Tarpley is against the FEDERAL Reserve, he has been campaigning against the 'FED' for decades, where have you been ??? yes, he defends FDR and new deal, but so what, many people are FDR admirers, what is so wrong about that??

  • Where have I been? At the Vancouver 911 Truth convention last June 2007 to hear Webster in person, where he said any attempt to do away with the Federal Reserve would result in a world wide catastrophic depression. He wants a big powerful central government, New Deal style with big public works financed by the Fed. It's Lyndon LaRouche; no doubt he'd like the Fed to print money to build a railway tunnel under the Bering Straight...

  • Webster's economics is a bit controversial and i am no econ. expert either. He should stick to his MAIN Forte-HISTORY and the Political(forces) that drive it. he is best suited for this !!, he wishes to place the FED. under 'democratic' congressional control, the rate of interest to be voted on..something like that. he wont do away with it, just reform it..

  • Secretary of War Stimson was also Skull and Bones

    ones

  • did Webster miss that? Maybe it was in the next installment

  • what you say would be so funny if it wasn't so sad...but maybe that is the tragedy of humor

  • Very Interesting

  • what's a 9/11 mythbuster? going after the co-intell?

  • I would like to hear a lot more about why LBJ wasn't involved with the JFK assassination?

  • I don't think puppets can do those kinds of things...they may want to be president and all that but there are bigger more hidden forces behind them that they would vex if they tried to hire their own assasins...

  • there are videos out there that say it was LBJ, that's why I'm asking, I figure Webster Tarpley has evidence for him to conclude that theory is "absurd", so that would be something I bet a lot of people would like to know

  • my experience is Webster tries to give the knowledge that is most useful for change and betterment for the immediate time. Roosevelt is of concern to Webster because under R more money came to regular people...(as opposed to dropping the Fed and having a civil war

  • LBJ might not have been involved in the JFK assassination. I damn bet he had foreknowledge of it happening.

    I have a hard time shallowing Tarpley's assertion that dubya had no foreknowledge of 911.

  • foreknowledge would be denied to anyone not clever enough to do something constructive for the perpetrators. just give puppets their parts to say don't you think?

  • Dubya might not of known the details. But, IMO he had to have some inside information. How else would he have known to watch the 1st plane hit the towers? Which he admitted to watching on TV.

  • If Webster could produce half hour lectures that can be played in high school history classes; that might do a good job of holding attention and creating interest. i could be wrong?

  • then the secret government wouldn't be so secret.....no I think this is calling forth the knowledge when you are ready

  • What does Webster Tarpley think about the 1933 theft of the American Gold?

  • a lot! He was impressed when I read his book on his site tarpleydotnet the part of his book "On Oligarchy"(I think it came out on the one I did with him about Adolf Hitler....showing how the pound sterling being devalued and NOT the US sock crash in 1829 was what caused such suffering over all the world

  • This theory is bogus. The stock market crash was the trigger for great depression. At the time of the stock market crash you could buy on 100 percent margin. You could purchase $100 of stock totally on credit. If you stock value dropped to $50 then you had either put $50 in your brokerage account or sell your stop. Even banks were purchasing stocks on margin using money people deposited into a bank.

  • no it was the devaluation of the British pound. read "Against Oligarchy" on tarpleydotnet

  • What happen was most stock dropped on Black Tuesday then people and also banks needed to sell their stocks fast to cover their margin call. This resulted in some banks going bankrupt. This caused people to take their money out of banks and this resulted in more banks to close. At the time there was no FDIC (federal deposit insurance) . If you bank want bankrupt then you lost all your money in that bank. This just snowballed.

  • Now lots of people have lost their saving so must cut back spending. Now depend for cars drops by a huge amount so the car company to prevent going bankrupt must layoff most of their workers. Now these worker have no jobs so they must reduce spending a lot. these works stop buying furniture so the furniture makers layoff most of their employees.. and this happens for other industries and and this snowballs and more and more people lost their jobs. I HOPE MR TARPLY CAN UNDERSTAND THIS.

  • did you even listen to this vid? it is about Pearl Harbor

  • Webster Tarpley theories in general are bogus and i use his "Great Depresion" theory as example. His "Pearl harbor" is ever more bogus.

  • Pearl Harbor happened because Japam has almost no natural resources (Oil, Coal, Iron Ore, etc) and the country they eventual occupied had large amounts of Natural resources. Who could stopped the Japanese.

  • The British were sorta of busy at the time. Remmber in 1939 that Britain declared war against germany after the German invasion. In 1940 German invaded France, Holland and Belgium. Only Britain was left in Europe and remember the Battle of Britain. Japan in 1941 wanted to continue to expand their Empire and Britain could not stop them. How had a big enough Navy to stop Japan.

  • Only the USA could stop the Japanese because the American Navy was bigger. The only way to defeat the American was to destroy the American Navy in Pearl Harbor. The Japanese almost won the second world war. why did they not win. The American Aircraft carriers were not in Pearl Harbor when it was attacked and the Japanese had no idea where they were. They canceled the 3rd attack because they were afraid that the American Aircraft carrier could have found then and attack.

  • IF the 3rd attack happened then then the air fields, dry docks, oil storage tanks would have been destroyed. Check your history and you will find that even a Japanese mini-sub got into Pearl Harbor and attack 2 American ships but missed. If the American Aircraft Carriers had been destroyed then what was left of the American fleet would have to been withdrawn back to San Diego. Webster Tarpley theory is NOT supported by the facts.

  • This is amazing.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more