Which Bible Can WeTrust? Les Garrett KJV niv rsv esv nlt Part 1 of 5

[Springs24]

If it ain't King James it ain't Bible...

[3fitzgrld]

biblebelievers. net/Bible Versions /kjckjv1s .htm You have to type it in your browser. I strongly urge anyone to read this. Then make your decision.

[HeidyfromNorway]

KJV

[GARYWERSLEY]

The Bible was wrote by man. In the name of the god of the ancient Isrealites. Which was a tribal god. Not the, God, creator of the universe. Believers claim that the god of the bible is the God Almighty. But they give it too many human characteristics. it is a changing god. demands worship. gets angry if not worshipped. punishes for non-worship.

The bible is the work of controling men, calling themselves prophets.

Just the same as the Koran.

It says the same thing. Death to the non-believer.

[only1TRUTH7771]

@GARYWERSLEY

Its says REPENT to the Non believers. Christ has come to Save.

It is for us to believe on HIM(Christ) who came to save us from the on coming destruction. Why don't u accept Christ, test The doctrine(teachings) and see for yourself if its True. Put faith in Christ and put into practice HIS teachings.

The TRUTH will reveal itself. U have nothing to loos by trying it, but everything to gain .

[kentx333]

Satan wrote the niv and the other new counter "bibles" and if anyone is deceived and thinks niv is word of God they are not saved according to John 8 and John 10.

[MDIS]

Is it not the work of the devil that for those who believed in God , for them to argue and rob and kill one another for the benefit of a particular tribe , clansmen or kinsmen?

For you are verily saved by salvation and that your salvation is your strength in faith. Follow not what the devil teach and unite against those who wishes to separate for verily i say unto you, the evil will work amongst those who believed.

Amen.

Rev Jacob

[Lee7676]

i prefer Byzantine text type over Textus receptus or alexandrian text type.

[snakeyez77]

KJV Onlyism does nothing but create divisions amongst Christians and churches. Just because someone prefers to read the NIV or NASB or NKJV makes them no less of a Christian than someone who reads the KJV.

This is a tool of the devil himself. The only people who care about what version of the Bible to read are Christians, and this movement can do nothing but cause disputes among Christians.

A good read on this is "The King James Only Controversy" by James R. White.

[Philos2006]

Which Bible Can WeTrust?

NONE. No outside, independant evidence

[Imaginefree69]

You cant trust the bible AT ALL,

it was a fireside book of myth to start with

and it has been degraded steadily ever since.

It is so vague, so internally inconsistent,

so filled with scientific and historical error

and so many contradictions

that it is totally worthless for any sort

of instruction or moral guidance.

[BCMTJCAC]

We have no common ground which to speak. You have no faith and no understanding of God's word. For you see it was the Bible that first said the earth was round, the life was in the blood....etc. As a matter a fact every time science has tried to prove it wrong has only proven it right. That is why it confounds the wise!

[Imaginefree69]

"it was the Bible that first said the earth was round"

No it didn't.

The Bible says the earth is flat.

And that the sun revolves around the earth.

And that humans are made of dirt.

And that snakes, donkeys, and bushes talk.

And that animals appeared AFTER man but BEFORE woman.

Other than a few minor details like that,

it's a really scientific book!

[BCMTJCAC]

"It is he that sitteth upon the CIRCLE of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:" Isaiah 40:22 Last time I checked a circle was round. Maybe you should actually read it before trying to tell someone who does read it every day what it says.

[Imaginefree69]

"Last time I checked a circle was round." Correct. Round and flat. Here's something you can do in your own home: Take a felt marker, a piece of cardboard, and a pair of blunt-tipped scissors. Draw a CIRCLE on the cardboard and carefully cut it out. Now try to roll it around the floor ad if it were a ball. As you will see, it falls over. Balls don't fall over. This is because balls are SPHERICAL, but your cardboard CIRCLE is not.

[BCMTJCAC]

The devil was speaking through the snake, an angle was speaking through the donkey, and Jesus was speaking through the bush. It must be sad to live in a world w/o a belief in miracles.

[Imaginefree69]

"It must be sad to live in a world w/o a belief in miracles."

It is, rather.

That's why I enjoy watching Harry Potter movies.

But it must be a real handicap to live in a world of delusion.

[BCMTJCAC]

Like I said to begin with we have no common ground in which to have a discussion. You think all circles are flat even a ball is a circle basic math there. Here is the main thing, If I am correct in my belief you die and are tortured forever. If you are right I've lived a wonderful life, helped others, chose faith in God and just die. So I have nothing to lose and you have everything. The choice is yours. You have no idea what you are talking about so why don't you go comment on Harry Potter

[Imaginefree69]

"You think all circles are flat even a ball is a circle basic math there."

Here's something you can try in your own home:

Take a felt marker, a piece of cardboard,

and a pair of blunt-tipped scissors.

Draw a CIRCLE on the cardboard and carefully cut it out.

Now try to roll it around the floor ad if it were a ball.

As you will see, it falls over.

Balls don't fall over.

This is because balls are SPHERICAL,

but your cardboard CIRCLE is not.

[BCMTJCAC]

How about getting a math book and look up Sphere and you will find that all spheres are circles but not all circles are spheres. Get a real big thick dictionary and look up Circle. You will find words like compass(which is another definition of the orginal hebrew word), sphere. Now take a picture of you sitting on that flat circle. Not an airial shot but just a strait on shot so that the person looking at it can see you really good. Show it to someone and ask them what you are sitting on.

[Imaginefree69]

"getting a math book and look up Sphere"

I'm not interested in esoteric speciality jargon.

The experiment you propose

is based on the subject having incomplete information.

And are you seriously arguing that YHWH,

the guy who created the earth,

is being fooled by his perspective?

An optical illusion?

[BCMTJCAC]

Isaiah wrote it after God gave him a vision. Really you should read it if you want to debate it.

[Imaginefree69]

You would like to propose that believing this myth has no costs, yet your own teachers (and Bible) tell you

that it costs EVERYTHING YOU HAVE

and EVERYTHING YOU ARE

(not shouting, just emphasizing)

I am passionately opposed to irrational thinking

being used to justify war and every evil,

being used to strangle scientific advance,

being used to justify hatred and discrimination

and to strip fellow citizens of their basic rights,

being used to stifle education and rational thought.

[BCMTJCAC]

You don't understand and so let me be clear. I had a choice. You have a choice. God is not irrational. God doesn't teach hatred or discrimination. Our government which promotes freedom is based on the Bible. Now you can disagree with that but it is history. That doesn't mean that people twist it to fit what they want. Just like people use the natural cycle of the earth to promote Global warming(talk about irrational thinking) folks use God's word to justify their actions. More to come

[Imaginefree69]

"God doesn't teach hatred or discrimination"

Of course he does.

Just read the book.

People are continually being killed and cursed

for no greater reason than their ethnicity.

[BCMTJCAC]

No for their disobedience.

[Imaginefree69]

"No for their disobedience."

How about bringing a bit more than that to the discussion?

Got some evidence to offer?

People in the bible are continually being killed and cursed

for no greater reason than their ethnicity

[BCMTJCAC]

Many cults are irrational in thier thinking. They use different versions of the Bible to twist and pervert what God teaches. True christianity has never started a war. You really should read it. God tells us to do to others as we want to be treated. Love our neighbor as ourselves. Yes he also tells us not associate with nonbelievers but many races worshiped together in the early church. Now on your 'emphasizing" There was a time in my life God spoke to my heart. Just as real as this ...

[Imaginefree69]

"Many cults are irrational in thier thinking."

ALL religions are irrational, by definition.

As for your experience in hearing god,

as a paramedic I have dealt with many people who heard god.

Valium often makes the voices go away.

[BCMTJCAC]

I hope you are never my paramedic. I would rather have one that believes in hope. I'm not crazy, but I don't care if you think I am. I said it wasn't an audiable voice. You've not had or not admit to having the experience of God's love or his wrath.

[Imaginefree69]

" I said it wasn't an audiable voice. "

Where did I say "audible"?

Please don't use your selective, manipulative scripture-reading skills

when reading my words.

Thanks.

[BCMTJCAC]

conversasion with you although not audiable. I chose to follow him. True Christianity is a choice not forced on someone.

[Imaginefree69]

"I have nothing to lose and you have everything." Not at all. Too many religious types tell you to despise this life, setting aside your plans and passions to "set aside treasures in heaven." Or else they threaten you with terrible lies about an eternal torture chamber operated by "the god of love." THIS life is all you have. The "life after death" is a bronze-age myth. "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery! None but ourselves can free our minds!" - Bob Marley

[BCMTJCAC]

Oh Contrar(I know it is misspelled) my friend. I am mentally free you on the other hand have choosen to believe whatever wind of doctrine given you by Humanism or Atheism. I am honest enough to say what I am. I have enjoyed the debate but this could go on forever and I garentee that you will not change me.

[Imaginefree69]

" I am honest enough to say what I am."

The insinuation (correctly spelled)

being that I am not?

Show me where I've been less than honest.

Use evidence, please, not emotion.

[chava2uk]

The word is the same as the one translated Passover everywhere else. To say that Easter is justified here for any reason is just plain daft. Easter has nothing to do with it.The text clearly refers to Passover since earlier it states these were the days of unleavened bread (v3) associated with passover, not Easter, so why argue for something that simply does not make sense?

[edwardpf123]

The days of unleavened bread came AFTER passover. If you ask a modern Greek their word for Easter, they will tell you 'pascha'

[chava2uk]

What has Easter to do with unleavened bread? Modern Greek is irrelevant. Everywhere in Scripture Pascha should be translated passover. "Easter" has no place here it is a bad, inaccurate, wrong translation.

The "Christian" Festival of Easter had not been invented at that time. Passover starts the days of unleavened bread. The Passover meal includes unleavened bread, all leaven is excluded from the house from the day before Passover.

[edwardpf123]

The one who coined the term 'passover' Tyndale, used the word Easter for it as well in his translation. It is not referring to the Christian festival of Easter, it is referring to a pagan feast day that mixed passover elements with pagan ones, just as modern Easter does.

[edwardpf123]

And that is why they didn't translate it as passover in Acts 12:4, they saw that it wasn't passover. Once the DAYS of unleavened bread began the Passover had passed.(14th day of April)

[chava2uk]

No Passover begins them

[edwardpf123]

No, the Passover was on the 14th and then began the feast of unleavened bread.

(Lev.23:5-6) Passover ended on the 15th.

[chava2uk]

Since unleavened bread is eaten at Passover, it is included in the days of unleavened bread. The Feast of unleavened bread, however, begins the next day.

[edwardpf123]

No, there are two feasts mentioned. The Passover was a special day ("high day' Jn.19:31). The feast of unleavened bread began offically on the 15th day, even though no leavened bread was eaten on the 14th day as well. (Lev.23:5-6). Now, the 23rd chapter of Lev. is where the details of the feasts were given and AFTER the 14th, Passover was over, but the feast of unleavened bread began.

[chava2uk]

the two feasts are Passover and unleavened bread. Both constitute the "days of unleavened bread"

[edwardpf123]

The two feasts are listed as offically beginning on different days, one on the 14th (Passover) and the other on the 15th, feast of unleavened bread. That is the offical way they are seen in Lev. 23 which gives the order of the feasts. So, both do not constitute the days of unleavened bread and Passover is never called the DAYS of unleavened bread.

[jesuswayph]

Divided you will fall:according to the Holy Scripture(Rom3:9-18),no one of you who understand, no one who seeks God and the WAY of TRUTH you do not know, meaning you do not have the HOLY SPIRIT within you.Even the prophets and angels wanted to see what I see but it was not given to them.I am a FRIEND and CHILD of GOD,not hiding the SECRET of the TRUTH of JESUS WORD to me;I was called to REVEAL the TRUTH ONLY to those who NEEDS and WANTS it--to SET them FREE.I DO NOT need a PRAISE of man but GOD.

[jesuswayph]

What is the best Bible version? There is no perfect English translations:but I used KJV & NIV for preaching and teaching; I prefer KJV for one on one word research, NIV for revealing the additions & deletions, and I also read other good versions to verify and compare the truth. Whatever is easy for anyone to understand is the best; what counts is the revelation of the TRUTH from the HOLY SPIRIT,and if those who hears the TRUTH will use what they have learned to apply it in their everyday life.

[jesuswayph]

One mistake I have found in almost every English translations, including KJV, NIV, etc:In Matt26:17;On the first Day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, the disciples comes to Jesus and asked,"Where do you want us to make preparations for you to eat the Passover?" The Passover meal was eaten the night of the Day of Preparation for the 1st Day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread.If the Feast is Thu,the customary Passover meal shall be eaten on the sunset of Tue--sunset to sunset reckoning.

[jesuswayph]

Pro30:6;Do not add to His Words or He will rebuke you and prove you a liar.NIV revealed in ftnotes & comts many chgs in Gr manuscripts after the 16th Century.1Jh5:7-8the Spirit,the water & the blood was changed to the Father,the Word & the Holy Spirit;proof used in trinity.Jh3:3&7born from above or born of the Spirit was changed to born again.Mk16end in vs8;9-20 was added t have a proof of 1st day resurrection and sunday worship. Changed fr did not see to have seen & said nothing to she told.

[jesuswayph]

Are you aware that from Gen. thru Rev,many Old English found in KJV have diff. meaning now in present English usage? To quote a few in the Bk. of Rom.4:4"reward" means "wage" now;4:20"staggered not" means "did not doubt" now;5:7"peradventure" means "perhaps" now;7:11"occasion" means "opportunity" now;7:17"no more" means "not really" in our present English usage now. A serious student or researcher of TRUTH will encounter this problem all over the KJV,unaware could easily miss the truth.

[jesuswayph]

Looking for word for word tranlation,KJV is the best, but to say that it is a perfect translation, I disagree. I never found a perfect English translation of the Holy Scripture.Matt26:17 failed almost all versions.The Passover meal was eaten the night of the Day of Preparation prior to the 1st Day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread. Let's say the Feast is Thu,the Passover meal shall be eaten on the sunset of Tue. Vs17 said on the first Day of the Feast of UB, they were just preparing for Passover.

[chava2uk]

How accurate is the KJV?

The Hebrew word YHVH is the name of God. (Yahweh, or Jehovah) The KJV translates it the LORD 6510 times, God 4 times and Jehovah only 4 times!

If it is without error, why does it do this? It deliberately hides the name of God.

[chava2uk]

Just an example of the KJV getting it wrong: "and Jacob was a plain man, dwelling in tents" Gen 25:27 (KJV)

The Hebrew word translated plain, actually means "perfect" or "upright".

The KJV served a political agenda. The NT name Jacob became James in honour of the king. The word "baptism" was invented to hide that "baptizo" referred to total immersion. Church ministries were not translated in a similar way, eg pastor, apostle, deacon. Deaconess is not in the Greek, deacon is used throughout.

[chava2uk]

No translation of anything is ever 100% accurate.[even the KJV] because the languages work differently and it is impossible to account for the nuances in the different languages. For official documents, more than one is made. Compare and contrast them research them, check the source when there is any doubt. I know not everyone can translate Greek and Hebrew, be aware of which texts they use . Where they differ, take the ones that rely on Textus Receptus. Don't rely on just one translation.

[fishslab]

2 Timothy 3:16, "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:"

For the translation to be pure and the word of God, it must be without error.

[chava2uk]

the original is without error. The KJV is not without error as i have said elsewhere. We must be diligent in our study and open to God's leading to understand His Truth. It's immpossible to translate 100% accurately between any two languages because they have different grammatical rules and word meanings overlap. It is impossible for the KJV or any translation to be that accurate. It is interesting that the NT writers quote a Greek translation that was very different from original Hebrew text.

[fishslab]

So, you're telling me that God cannot move men to translate with one-hundred percent accuracy?!!

[blueblue1891]

fishslab: Doubt, deny, deify, same old tactic satan always uses.

Looks like chava2uk belongs to the other team, he's here casting doubts together with some of his friends.

[chava2uk]

The word "DBR" in Hebrew means "word or thing" (that is a simplification of the problem). To be 100% accurate, the KJV would have to use an ENglish word that meant "word or thing". It. It is Greek & ways. English Words used in KJV: word 807 thing 231 matter 63 acts 51 chronicles 38 saying 25 commandment 20 miscellaneous translations 204 —Strong's Dictionary To be 100% accurate, which one English word would you use?

[chava2uk]

As I tried to say below, before my browser crashed and cut out the middle,languages don't overlap perfectly so it can't be done.

The KJV has it's share of errors. The translation of PASCHA as Easter in Acts 12:4 is wrong. The context makes it quite clear it should be Passover as it is every one of 38 other times it occurs.

God understands how language works, the alternative translations can be helpful. Perhaps he allowed them for a purpose?

[fishslab]

The Answer Book by Samuel Gipp debunks the myth that Easter should not be present in the Authorized Version (KJV).

God allows many things, chava2uk. God did not inspire those corrupt translations. God inspired the KJV perfectly.

[chava2uk]

Why then are so many words like "baptism" , "deacon", "pastor", and "Christ"(to name but a few) essentially left untranslated from the Greek?

Christ means "anointed one". Translating it properly in:

For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.

Mark 13:22 (KJV)

would make the warning much clearer to the church today! We have so many claiming "the anointing". The KJV has hidden this warning from the church !

[edwardpf123]

And what is the problem with that? Baptism by the way is an Englsh word.

No, poor Bible teaching and not believing the Book has hidden the truth. All one has to do is understand that the sign gifts were for the transtion period when the NT Canon was being formed and those gifts ceased when the Canon closed.

[chava2uk]

Baptism was not an English word before the translators invented it. "Baptism" was invented by the translators to hide the fact it was full immersion of believers. The established Church did not practice this. It is the anglicised form of "baptizo" Greek meaning to immerse. Another example of hiding the Truth by not translating the word into the English.

[edwardpf123]

No, actually Baptism was a word in the English usage before it was translated into the Bible. And Baptism doesn't just mean immersion, it's primary meaning is idenfication with. Now, that the person was to be immersed in water to be identified with the death, burial and resurrection is made clear by the context.

Baptism hides nothing.

[chava2uk]

According to Liddell and Scott "baptizo" means to dip(repeatedly), immerse , bathe and to dye. what dictionary are you using to get "identify with"?

I would be interested in examples of the English usage.

[edwardpf123]

You might want to look up the word in the OED and there you will find the various ways it was used in pre-1611 English.

[chava2uk]

ok thanks

[edwardpf123]

It is actually from the 13th century. And the context will tell you if immersion is being discussed. Moses was not immersed in 1Cor.10:2, the Egyptians were!

[13th century. Via French baptiser and ecclesiastical Latin baptisare< Greek baptizein "baptize" < baptein "dip"]

[chava2uk]

That does not change the meaning of the Greek , nor the fact it referred to a very Hebrew practice - the mikvah. The word was used to enable the church to hide the true meaning of the Greek.

Moses and the Hebrews passed through the water (a phrase also used of those who are baptized by immersion) They survived. The Egyptians did not pass through, they drowned.

[edwardpf123]

Moses and the Hebrews were not immersed in water, the water separated for them. Context determines the correct meaning in each usage of the word and nothing is hidden. I have yet to see any Bible take out the word baptism and replace it with immersion.

[chava2uk]

They passed through the water and lived. Raised up to a new life of freedom. Immersion symbolises the same thing. To be true to the Greek, Bibles should use the word immersion, then there would be no confusion.

[edwardpf123]

LOL! No, if they used immersion ever time Baptism was used they would be confused since the children of Israel were not 'immersed' the army of Phaorah were and they drowned.

[chava2uk]

Whether the Bible writers use it figuratively or not, the Greek word still means immersed. We miss the point if we tamper with that.

[edwardpf123]

No, the word doesn't always mean immerse in the Gr. either. Thayers has several meanings, including dipping, immersing, washing. So no one is missing anything by staying with the English.

[chava2uk]

What have the sign gifts got to do with this? Why would Jesus warn us about false anointed ones and their false signs and wonders if all that was obviously done away with? I think I would rather listen to him than risk my salvation on men's opinions and just one flawed translation.

[chava2uk]

The term Passover is loosely to cover the days of Unleavened Bread. The context here is Israel, Hebraic, not Pagan europe. Easter does not belong here, it never did.

[edwardpf123]

Passover is the 14th day. The feast of unleavened bread followed THAT day. That is why the Holy Spirit mentioned it in Acts 12;3 to tell us that the actual Passover had passed. Easter does belong in the passage. The context is an Ebionite King and a pagan holiday coming at the same time as Passover, which sounds very much like Easter to me!

[chava2uk]

Passover refers to the whole period. It does today and has done for centuries. It is talking about Jewish people in a Jewish context speaking in a Jewish way. The "days of unleavened bread" and Passover both refer to the same thing. Easter has no place here. It never did. You need to look more closely at the Hebraic nature of this. The "days of unleavened bread" ind the "feast of unleavened bread " are not the same thing. Unleavened bread is eaten at Passover too.

[rb300dx]

Yes... You are exactly right. Yet the KJV "Onlyist" are steadfast in their defense of circular reasoning, ignoring irrefutable fact(s) when presented; "they" are frustrating to reason with. I just thank God that their are more "readable" versions out there for those who find the 400 yr. old English of the KJV too daunting. Over the years I've heard many people who were thankful to have God's word in a understandable version for the nourishment of their souls. Quite foolish debate and go witness!

[chava2uk]

What about the errors in the KJV?

Where does Paul say the translations are without error?

What about the added words in italics?

Atranslation "pure and without error"? There is none. We need to be vigilant, prayerful and willing to study. Such a situation keeps us on our toes. To accept any English translation as foolproof is folly. So many words in the KJV are difficult to understand, many have changed meaning. We have to learn a another language to read it. Why not learn Greek and Hebrew?

[fishslab]

Watch my videos on Gail Riplinger. She answers many, if not all, of your questions.

[chava2uk]

Really? If she believes the KJV is totally accurate and encapsulates the full meaning of scripture in its original languages without error she knows nothing about how translation works nor how differently languages function.

[edwardpf123]

The KJB is totally accurate and does give the full meaning of the orginals in the English. God is able to make His words be completely understood in any language.

[chava2uk]

pastor means shepherd, why did they not say that? And why, pray, did they invent the term deaconess? the Greek uses the masculine throughout. That changes the meaning, surely!

[edwardpf123]

There is no word deaconess in the KJB. What bible are you looking at? what is wrong with the word pastor, it is seems clear to me.

[chava2uk]

Sorry, you are right about Deaconess. I was reading something quickly and made a mistake.

The English word for Pastor is Shepherd, what is wrong with using the English word in the English Bible rather than a contrived one imported from Greek?

[peanutplays]

In the NASB Psalms 78: 36 -37 says, "But they deceived him with THEIR MOUTH, And lied to Him with THEIR TONGUE. For their heart was not steadfast toward Him, nor were they faithful in His covenant."

Then in vs. 38 it says he forgave their iniquity so I think the above verses are about how the people were towards God not so much about how was affected by them.

[DianaArmstrongGonzal]

All versions of God's Word have brought people to Christ. This is yet another ridiculous arguement from petty believers. Focus on what is important; searching out and bringing the lost to Christ!

[Afrikitty]

Well said!

[shekinah951]

@DianaArmstrongGonzal I've sat with Les quite a few times.He's truely a man of God.Diana,he's not a petty believer but does his homework and is convincing.I don't agree with Kent below but again,it's a convincing argument.

[mumpty]

STILL cannot get a straight answer for the KJVO'ers... what about my brothers & sisters who only read French, Spanish, Russian, Korean, Chinese etc.... To say KJV is the most accurate translation into English at the TIME of the KJV 1611 (or the 1769 AV), thats OK, but to say it is the exclusive version from God to us, then we are promoting Jacobean English as `divine`.. and it easily becomes a fruitless skirmish as to `which` version

[jinkyfc]

its not really a question of kjv v niv but rather the texts that they come from. All other bibles ion all other countries prior to the late 19th century would have come from the same text as the KJV did

[kjvonly01]

There have been many Bibles produced FROM THE KJV in those languages. We are talking about an infallible English version for English speaking people.

[chava2uk]

Where do you get the information that the KJV is infallible? In some places it is just plain wrong. (see my last post).

A translation of a translation cannot be very accurate. We translated texts back into Hebrew for an excercise at University, the results were revealing, but not very scriptural sometimes.

[jojojr2]

@mumpty as long as that Bible is translated from the ORIGINAL transcripts from Hebrew, then its ok, the new bibles fallow an alexandrian text...found in egypt.

[peanutplays]

I like the New King James version and the American Standards best.

[Dejan2116]

Do you like the NASB where it says God is decieved(Psalm 78:36)? Is this really the word of God, hmmmmm, go get yourself a KJV not false translations that blaspheme against God.

[CuchiKloudes]

the KJV Bible ,in my opinion, is the ONLY Bible worthy of being called The Word of God.

Thanks for posting this video

[jinkyfc]

no worries

im glad that many people out there are sticking to the sound doctrine of thev KJV

[enerjon777]

The Companion Bible

original langugages

[DianaArmstrongGonzal]

Why do so many spend there time aguring with other believers about which Bible to read, when the rapture will happen, can we lose our salvation(NO), etc...?; instead of FOCUSING on what is important, the lost souls? It doesn't really matter mwhich version one reads, they have ALL brought people to Christ! Time is short, life is short; eternity is forever...use your time wisely.

[Laras420]

Amen

[Loonypics]

The NIV should called the HIV it's pure poison !

[chava2uk]

Our nickname for it is "the Never Intended Version"

[Loonypics]

My nickname for the Niv is the HIV just as deadly !

[kjvonly01]

Job:38:2: Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?

Ps:50:16: But unto the wicked God saith, What hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth?

17: Seeing thou hatest instruction, and castest my words behind thee.

19: Thou givest thy mouth to evil, and thy tongue frameth deceit.

[WisePillow]

I have two NIV versions and found a verse missing in Matthew chapter 18. Its verse 11.

[DianaArmstrongGonzal]

11"For The Son Of man came to save [ from the penalty of eternal death] that which is lost." It is strange that the verse is missing but it is not missing in the Amplified Version. AV has been my Bible for many, many years and has saved many from satan's grip including myself. WHY do some christians spend their time arguing with other christians instead of focusing on what is really important? Saving the lost, just like that verse is talking about. Leading those who do not know Jesus to Him!

[WisePillow]

Actually, I was only just introduced to the who bible version debate an hour or so ago. I'm not interested(wether your talking about me or not) in argueing with others. I just want to know which Bible version is an accurate one so that I won't be mislead by wrong tranlations. Or, by bibles that have, apparently, removed verses. Like my NIV, example. Unless it was done by accident...

[DianaArmstrongGonzal]

That verse (Matt.18:11) is missing in my NIV (The Quest Study Bible), why I'm not sure but I do recommend this book for understanding His Word easily.I also really like my Amplified Version I have which is much easier to read then the KJV that is full of 16th century words. Really, the Quest Study Bible is a great one to own! God Bless You!

[edwardpf123]

It was removed because the Amplified is following the corrupt texts of the Nestle/Aland, United Bible Society, the same texts which all modern versions follow.

[DianaArmstrongGonzal]

FOCUS people! WHY? do you spend so much time & energy arguing amoung other believers instead of trying to save as many as you can from hell? You argue over what Bible to read, when the rapture will be, can we lose our salvation(NO), etc...It is NOT that important which Bible one reads! Many have come toknow Jesus and God's Word through ALL versions. Where is the love Jesus commanded us to show each other?

[jinkyfc]

thanks for the comment and the rating.

the more that anyone studies the area of the original text the more obvious it is that the kjv came from the original text and all the modern versions are deeply corrupt.

[edwardpf123]

Amen brother! And IT DOES MATTER!

[kjvonly01]

A lot of Bible haters with a Jehudi pen knife out wanting to carve up, or remove Gods book altogether if they could.

Ps:119:89: For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven.

Thanks brother.

Hey, I'm the first viewer.