I got 3 out of 9 right, after the first 4 everything I got was wrong. That was very difficult and I am usually very good at tests. Yep the bible was very clear in its predictions of scientific discoveries. NOT!!!!!!
Genesis 1:1 (The Heavens and the Earth are created on the same day) is shown to be incorrect by which scientific finding:
A) Radiometric dating
B) Measuring Thermal Gradients
C) Helioseismic verification
D) Observing Cosmic Red-shift
E) Use of the Lambda-CDM concordance model
F) All of the above
ANSWER: (F)
I would caution you against quoting scripture as predicting scientific findings when the first passage in the bible is the first of many disproven by the same meticulous scientific work.
I got 5/9, i got the last 4 right in row, I think I was slowly starting to allow my mind to be so bastardised that I actually managed to make sense of their warped retarded state of mind!
So in the end you atheists fail and fall flat on your face, because attacking the bible with your armchair commentary that biased to begin with is irrelevant. Christians hardly read the bible, in fact atheists who live the life of freedom actually spend more time reading the bible and obsessing about God then average christian does..Atheists are so absolutely fucking pathetic lol
Bible attacks are useless christians hardly read the bible rofl you cockroaches
The insects of humanity otherwise known as atheists can attack the bible all they want with their armchair commentary, but the fact remains, christians don't come to christ by the bible....they come to christ by the holy spirit, in fact I'm the only christian out of the christians I know of that has even read the bible, so you atheists better switch your targets to the self authenticating holy spirit
only got 7, 8 and 9 right. 7 and 8 were slightly more obvious that the others, and I got 9 right because I decided to pick the answer that seemed most wrong. Coincidence?
Scares me that anyone would consider any of this as actual current knowledge. It's like a reaper reaching from the grave, Trying to trip and grab as many as possible.
All so obvious, whats wrong with you all? Even my great grandmother says in 1916 when Einstein published the field equations, she was like, well duuuh! Romans 10: 6 & 7.
1/9 for me, I got the Radio right. You know, for me reading through conservapedia is like sparkling salt on a bird's tail: pointless, an act of cruelty towards animals and a waste of time. This looks like the result of a huge effort, anyway. Their brain is still smoking in labour.
My brain fell out. Here's my answer followed by the correct answer. 1.B-A 2.D-B 3.D-B 4.B-D 5.B-D 6.C-A 7.A-A* A car was the closest thing to a Horse, I guess....... 8.B-B* I figured some poor people don't have TVs, so...... 9.D-D* Pure guess, although I kinda wanted to answer the Elevator I need a drink.........
statistically nice 3/9 not bad eh :D anyway, first had to be missile def system cos planes have nothing to do with defense, unless they have more specific answer, 1 - F22 Raptor with stinger missiles 2 - correct 3 - had to be C, all matter is the same, only then u can multiply visually different but yet the same things. 4 - jets, had to be :D 5- germ theory definitely, germs make wine so...why not 6 - C, 7 - B sheram for sure 8 - correct 9 - correct, least likely
A meagre 4/9. I then rolled a dice (1=A, 2=B etc, 5+6=roll again) and got 5/9. What do you know? My dice knows more about the bible than I do.
RB
PS: having read through the other comments, I'm kinda worried that I scored as high as I did. And my dice is now in the post to the other side of the atlantic, where it doubtless longs to be...
@GnizLoco Re Ah, I got a meagre 4/9. I then rolled a dice (1=A, 2=B etc, 5+6=roll again) and got 5/9. What do you know? My dice knows more about the bible than I do.
I have new evidence for the bible's scientific foreknowledge of Einstein's theory of special relativity: Holy Trinity and Divine Foreknowledge :-) How about that! ;-) Have a look at: /watch?v=xABKaUA7F5U - the relevant part starts at 4:50...
1) B 2) D 3) B 4) B 5) D 6) A 7) B 8) C 9) A I've never been so proud of getting 4/9 on a test. It's comforting to know I'm incapable of emulating creationist inference.
i like turtles so i win... i think my brain just melted, interesting i couldn't answer these questions with my logic, however i managed to get 1 right (the meteor)
Only two correct haha. Surprisingly (not surprisingly?) those were the ones I had no idea and guessed randomly on, as opposed to trying to figure it out.
1)a 2)a 3)b (Banach Tarski I assume) 4)d 5)d 6)a 7)b 8)c 9)a 5/10 You have to think like a religious fundamentalist - pick up on odd words and try to make them fit. Remember this is to baffle and impress a readership too stupid to know how ridiculous it is.
3 correct, born & raised Catholic, "I don't know" x 7-8 years now....
I pretty much hit random chance there... and the ones I got right I got due to "picking the most absurd answer I could" (since it seemed a guessing game anyways).
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
That said, you saying that the answers were from Conservapedia made me assume they'd all be absurd, otherwise I probably wouldn't have been so 'open-minded',,,
I just knew the last one was going to be somesort of hail mary WTF. The other two I think only come from when I focused on guessing the most retarded possibility.
I got 4 right, 5 wrong. I've never heard any of the quotes, but I have heard of the loaves and fishes, and I got that one wrong. The force was with me.
Well, I took the test and am proud to announce that my answers were absolutely what you'd expect from random chance. However, my interpretation of my score is "Jesus Loves Me", an automatic 100%.
Question: If Jesus walking on water was an example of the wave-particle nature of matter, then why is it that far more comprehensive and detailed understandings of wave/particle duality have lead to no advancements in human water striding?
i got question 1 correct, 4 correct, 7 correct, 8 correct, and i was considering D for question 9 but i put A thinking "there's no way they're going to say they predicted Einstein's theories" but that was of course naive of me. The majority i got wrong and the questions i did get right were mostly guesses anyway.
By the way..lately I have been trying to get theists which I consider intelligent enough to question their faith. Some did, but some said "though shall not take the lord's name in vane in my presence!" Got 3 people thinking so far, out of 5 I approached. I think it's a reasonably good percentage, don't you?
7/10! Very full knowledge of the bible, but better intuition of what conservative Christians would probably think important and want to claim in the name of jebus.
Well, through mind-bendingly forcing my thought patterns into what I figured approximated the average of my family and community that I grew up in (SW Missouri, the Ozarks) for 6 of them. Then I guessed on the 4 that I had no idea what the foxtrot uniform charlie kilo it could possibly be. Now, I grew up in a Southern Baptist / Pentecostal area, so have read NIV & KJV both complete -- started questioning the bible / pastor / church @7yo. I scored 10/10 does that count, or am I just really lucky?
@shoopoop21 You sound just as stupid and arrogent by correcting someone of poor grammer, this is a computer not an english class. Stop being so arrogent. Some people just don't know how to spell that good. Its not a crime to have poor grammer and doesn't make them any less smart.
@AstrophelTDeath Having poor grammar and spelling actually does make them less smart. Intelligent people tend to know how to spell and have proper sentences. Such as "arrogant" and "how to spell well" not "how to spell good". Although you are correct in the fact that what I'm using is a computer. Although this is YouTube and the Internet. You get 1/2 credit for at least knowing what the thing you're staring at is. Congratulations.
@JoeKerXO Really ? Albert Eienstein, one of the greatest minds the world has ever known, had never even passed high school. There alot of great minds out there that don't even know how to read. Most svant's don't know how to read, yet there are incredibly smart at what they do. What I am trying to say is stop acting like you can make more of a point because you english is better. It does not prove your argument. Its a logical fallacy, to discard someone's point mearly on a few spelling errors.
@AstrophelTDeath@AstrophelTDeath "Really ? Albert Eienstein, one of the greatest minds the world has ever known, had never even passed high school." Yes he did, and got entry into polytechnic from which he also graduated
@AstrophelTDeath I never said VyckRo was stupid. Never. If anything, my worst crime was telling to stop posting comments, though to be fair, for good reason. I cant even understand what he's trying to say..
@VyckRo: What questions? Ones that can't be tested scientifically? Of course they won;t answer those kinds of non-sequitars. I will happlily regale you with my morals and beliefs, but a "God" or "gods" are not in them. If that is all that there is to discuss that atheists "can't answer", then the broad topic is a simplified Rorschach test of "right and wrong".
@VyckRo: When you say "God", I hear "College of Bishops" and "Nicean Council". Where? Common sense. Is it wrong to kill other beings who are not trying to kill you? Is it wrong to take from others what they need to survive or what they have made or purchased? No. Evolution suggests we are hardwired this way because doing so is counterproductive to survival of the species. This notion of collective morals is not "relative", it is what all humans share. I was raised to have empathy. It works.
Morals stem from physical evolution by natural selection. If you can't grasp this concept it means you don't understand the theory of evolution, and your opinion does not matter on debates over evolution and creation. How can you debate against something you do not grasp?
And the eternal question: did god create the morals and we follow them because he says so, or are morals universal and god did not create them, he just made us aware of them (assuming the bible is moral... heh)
It seems the more you know about the theory purportedly foretold, the less likely you are to ascribe it to the passage which allegedly shows foreknowledge of it. I have friends who are Christians, but this is just nutty. It is too bizarre that people who believe in such tripe are intelligent enough to turn on a computer, let alone edit a website.
4 correct seems to be a common result (I also got 4). Almost all of my answers came from trying to think like they did; ie, pull out of a body cavity.
see, all Einstien really had to do was read the bible and that would have made everything so much easier. He probably read the bible after and thought, "Aw, damn it. It was right here the whole time."
Question five I just completely guessed because none of them made any sense to me haha. Hope you find my answers interesting and thanks for putting this quiz up it was err interesting.
Wow, some people had to try really really hard to come up with that! C'mon, a bunch of old coots stealing the words (they figured wise) from past cultures, compiling their very own book for their new religion, and trying to sound like they could forsee the future by thousands of years to boot? Conservapedia my ass...Don't believe everything you read.
I got 5 out of 9. But then, I'm a regular contributor to the watchdog wiki RationalWiki that keeps an eye on the insanity of Conservapedia. So, I have some insight into their crazy ways of thought... and some specific foreknowledge of the answers ;)
@morganbath btw after about 10 seconds it occured to me that as obvious as it is that my comment was sarcasm, that does not always translate in text. So before you respond, no I was not serious, and I am not trying to poe you :)
Of course you know what's good about this? Even most religious people know in their heart that science is the only true source of knowledge. That's why they want to use it to justify their beliefs and latch onto it like fleas on an Elephant's back or lamprey eels on a Shark or leeches on anything. They don't really like or understand science but they do know it is greater than their weak, pathetic and false made-up Gods. They just won't admit it in public. But they have nightmares about it!
That is ridiculous! Are these really the best ones from the Bible? It wouldn't be so bad if at least they were plausible. I think it would take a lot of double-think to believe those as any sort of prediction. Their answers are a load of shite!
some dude obviously edited the conservapedia article for all this nonsense to be stated there, none of this can be taken seriously by even the most hardcore of deluded retards, SURELY.
The real stupidity here is not in Convservopedia's answers, it is that they couldn't come up with much better foreknowledge connections. For example, on the first one I thought for sure it would be Israel's 7 days war, and not the airplane, but convservopedia totally missed it.
pfft dr suess had a completely accurate pre-knowledge of lol-cats. what do you think the cat in the hat fortold? it is because he was divinely inspired! dr suess is the real mesiah, down with false religions. we should revere the holy works of dr suess and the wisdom contained within his books.
ye looking back we can say that jesus walking on water is evidence of wave/particle duality. but if the bible really meant this stuff than where is the mentioning of interference patterns??
Clearly every single one is the wave particular thing-y - even the few for which that's not given as an option.
ArcasDevlin 3 weeks ago
I got the first one right. That was all. I should have guessed. Seemed to work for them :p
1Bilco1 2 months ago
3/9, but considering how batshit insane any of the answers were, I was happy to get that high a result.
mygodlesslife 6 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
CLICK ON: disccentury, GOSPEL MUSIC, NEVER SEEN
disccentury 6 months ago
I got 3 out of 9 right, after the first 4 everything I got was wrong. That was very difficult and I am usually very good at tests. Yep the bible was very clear in its predictions of scientific discoveries. NOT!!!!!!
thesparitan 6 months ago
1. That...BIRDS CAN FLY :D
2. THE EARTH IS A BALL :D
3. PEOPLE ARE STARVING!
4. People are part fish
5. Wedding hosts are followed by lots of drunks
6. Ok...someone was REALLY high
7. I'm gonna get a pony for my birthday?! :D
8. Birds are good for dinner
9. Asking who makes the tea gets you in time out
KittenKitoko 8 months ago 3
Genesis 1:1 (The Heavens and the Earth are created on the same day) is shown to be incorrect by which scientific finding:
A) Radiometric dating
B) Measuring Thermal Gradients
C) Helioseismic verification
D) Observing Cosmic Red-shift
E) Use of the Lambda-CDM concordance model
F) All of the above
ANSWER: (F)
I would caution you against quoting scripture as predicting scientific findings when the first passage in the bible is the first of many disproven by the same meticulous scientific work.
234TIPPMANNA5 9 months ago 2
@234TIPPMANNA5 Uh... this is a parody video.
atheistram 1 month ago
I got the last one right, thats all.
kartorus 9 months ago
Conservapedia: Because what I believe is more important that what is true.
fatcharlie24 9 months ago
I got 5 right! Hooraaaaaay!
MARI0LAND 9 months ago
@MARI0LAND Thats a F but its better then what I got which is 25% right.
thesparitan 6 months ago
2 right answers. I'm going to hell.
wptte 10 months ago 2
What the Hell?
calmreason 10 months ago
wave particle nature of matter is the answer for all of them!!!
Lance0Tiger 10 months ago
I answered: B,D,C,B,D,A,B,C,A
So I only got 2 right :-P
Einsteinium007 11 months ago
"A mind so open that your brain may well fall out" LMAO!!
I did this few months ago and I got 4/9 if I remember correctly.
pololopo23 1 year ago
I got 5/9, i got the last 4 right in row, I think I was slowly starting to allow my mind to be so bastardised that I actually managed to make sense of their warped retarded state of mind!
andy4226uk 1 year ago
So in the end you atheists fail and fall flat on your face, because attacking the bible with your armchair commentary that biased to begin with is irrelevant. Christians hardly read the bible, in fact atheists who live the life of freedom actually spend more time reading the bible and obsessing about God then average christian does..Atheists are so absolutely fucking pathetic lol
Bible attacks are useless christians hardly read the bible rofl you cockroaches
Templarforever 1 year ago
@Templarforever You have mental issues then need to be dealt with.
thesparitan 6 months ago
The insects of humanity otherwise known as atheists can attack the bible all they want with their armchair commentary, but the fact remains, christians don't come to christ by the bible....they come to christ by the holy spirit, in fact I'm the only christian out of the christians I know of that has even read the bible, so you atheists better switch your targets to the self authenticating holy spirit
Templarforever 1 year ago
1 of 9. I'm an awful conservative.
Efogoto 1 year ago
only got 7, 8 and 9 right. 7 and 8 were slightly more obvious that the others, and I got 9 right because I decided to pick the answer that seemed most wrong. Coincidence?
mosquitoe4 1 year ago
And the birth of Jesus is scientific fore knowledge of breaking condoms.
Dokazuj91 1 year ago 4
Boy, the lord sure does work in idiotic ways
metalisbetter1o00 1 year ago
I got zero.
JerezJulio 1 year ago
@JerezJulio somehow I got -1 must be that "off by one error"
startreking2007 1 year ago
1/8 i did worst then basic probability, trying to make sense of the bible is worst then random chance
lordmat666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1/9 i did worst then basic probability, trying to make sense of the bible is worst then random chance
lordmat666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1/9 i did worst then basic probability, trying to make sense of the bible is worst then random chance
lordmat666 1 year ago
Comment removed
lordmat666 1 year ago
Scares me that anyone would consider any of this as actual current knowledge. It's like a reaper reaching from the grave, Trying to trip and grab as many as possible.
pumpstations 1 year ago
eh 3?
Echowraith 1 year ago
It scares me that I actually got 5 right.
weltentdeckerin 1 year ago
I only got #4 right, how the fuck is 9 relativity!?!?!?!
WonderNerd24 1 year ago
All so obvious, whats wrong with you all? Even my great grandmother says in 1916 when Einstein published the field equations, she was like, well duuuh! Romans 10: 6 & 7.
meucunt1 1 year ago
damn I got none right. Even when some of the passages seemed to describe something in the answers it was still wrong.
TheNinjaWallaby 1 year ago
1/9 for me, I got the Radio right. You know, for me reading through conservapedia is like sparkling salt on a bird's tail: pointless, an act of cruelty towards animals and a waste of time. This looks like the result of a huge effort, anyway. Their brain is still smoking in labour.
M0rbidin0 1 year ago
im fine w/ some of the answers ... others are a bit far-fetched
VmanLee 1 year ago
1 bullshit
2 bullshit
3 bullshit
4 bullshit
5 bullshit
6 bullshit
7 bullshit
8 bullshit
9 bullshit
Akirilus 1 year ago
2/9 (I got 5 and 8 correct). That's ridiculous, as are the notions that any of these predict anything. Apparently God is also Nostrdadamus.
reishvedaur 1 year ago
haloboz 1 year ago
UninstallingWindows 1 year ago
ohh seriously... I think DPRJones's point is that you could pull any fucking meaning you like from this garbage...
But the bible did get one thing right... the bit at the end where it states that the
"characters in this book are entirely fictitious, any resemblance to people living or dead is entirely coincidental"
MumblingMickey 1 year ago
A meagre 4/9. I then rolled a dice (1=A, 2=B etc, 5+6=roll again) and got 5/9. What do you know? My dice knows more about the bible than I do.
RB
PS: having read through the other comments, I'm kinda worried that I scored as high as I did. And my dice is now in the post to the other side of the atlantic, where it doubtless longs to be...
XtalQRP 1 year ago 6
"Conservapedia, the trustworthy encyclopedia?"
What a blatant lie!
starrytwilight494 1 year ago
1: Wrong
2: Wrong
3: Wrong
4: Wrong
5: Wrong
6: Wrong
7: Wrong
8: Wrong
9: Right
on the last i just chose the least likely.
GnizLoco 1 year ago
@GnizLoco Re Ah, I got a meagre 4/9. I then rolled a dice (1=A, 2=B etc, 5+6=roll again) and got 5/9. What do you know? My dice knows more about the bible than I do.
RB
XtalQRP 1 year ago
1... Just... 1.
I just guessed it sounded vaguely like a plane. Then again I had recently heard that song "BirdPlane" and could be confused...
SuperBrobot 1 year ago
I have new evidence for the bible's scientific foreknowledge of Einstein's theory of special relativity: Holy Trinity and Divine Foreknowledge :-) How about that! ;-) Have a look at: /watch?v=xABKaUA7F5U - the relevant part starts at 4:50...
dada31415 1 year ago
I answered: 'None' to every question. I guess this is why I am not a believer.
stevehayes13 1 year ago
CynicLogic 1 year ago
3/9
I sincerely hope that #9 is a troll...
fuzzylogic11 1 year ago
4 out of 9 for me. Subtracting the meteorite thingy, which was rather obvious, I would say I'm perfectly well within the random chance brackets.
KaroKoenich 1 year ago
i like turtles so i win... i think my brain just melted, interesting i couldn't answer these questions with my logic, however i managed to get 1 right (the meteor)
sinduda 1 year ago
I got 5/9 correct. It would've been funny if all the answers were "ALL OF THE ABOVE."
luvmusic82 1 year ago
Only two correct haha. Surprisingly (not surprisingly?) those were the ones I had no idea and guessed randomly on, as opposed to trying to figure it out.
Seera8472 1 year ago
Zantorc 1 year ago
3 correct, born & raised Catholic, "I don't know" x 7-8 years now....
I pretty much hit random chance there... and the ones I got right I got due to "picking the most absurd answer I could" (since it seemed a guessing game anyways).
OjLeno 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The time has come for Free energy to be revealed ,But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Get a REAL working magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
faerydhhlo 1 year ago
5/9
lifelong atheist.
That said, you saying that the answers were from Conservapedia made me assume they'd all be absurd, otherwise I probably wouldn't have been so 'open-minded',,,
gzazz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1.B
2.B
3.B
4.B
5.B
6.B
7.C
8.B
9.D
8NCLI8 1 year ago
Shit, did anyone else only get 1 right. Their answers seemed fucking retarded
DarthChee 1 year ago
Hey DPR, only two correct for me I'm afraid.......or should I be proud? With respect to the questions in question, they were 2 and 5 respectively.
thebrassdubliner 1 year ago
The rest of the site is even worse.
The bible predicts that bloodletting hastens death? Gee, who'd have guessed?
Guncriminal 1 year ago
me and my bro tied at 2... and those are all fucking awesome
NeverEnoughBall 1 year ago
Errr, got 4 and 5 right... Biblical science FTW lol
L9time 1 year ago
Who cares for the answers? All I have learned is that Conservapedia = Lunacy!
June28July 1 year ago
Haha, I got 5, 8, and 9 right.
I just knew the last one was going to be somesort of hail mary WTF. The other two I think only come from when I focused on guessing the most retarded possibility.
Paur 1 year ago
2 out of 9. I got questions 1 and 8 correct.
unvorsum 1 year ago
I only got two rights =/
TheRobinL 1 year ago
2 for 9
TobiasELee 1 year ago
I thought the answer to question 6 was "iron maiden". Quite a loud and colorful show and a "blast".
mrfinn99 1 year ago
I got 1... the radio.
When you said the answer to question 9, I couldn't help but scream "Go fuck yourselves" out loud. Such absurdity.
ManicDX10 1 year ago
I got 4 right, 5 wrong. I've never heard any of the quotes, but I have heard of the loaves and fishes, and I got that one wrong. The force was with me.
thereforeithought 1 year ago
Well, I took the test and am proud to announce that my answers were absolutely what you'd expect from random chance. However, my interpretation of my score is "Jesus Loves Me", an automatic 100%.
Question: If Jesus walking on water was an example of the wave-particle nature of matter, then why is it that far more comprehensive and detailed understandings of wave/particle duality have lead to no advancements in human water striding?
Sinuev1 1 year ago
I dont understand WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON GHAAHAHHHHH
Killerwalrus234 1 year ago
i got question 1 correct, 4 correct, 7 correct, 8 correct, and i was considering D for question 9 but i put A thinking "there's no way they're going to say they predicted Einstein's theories" but that was of course naive of me. The majority i got wrong and the questions i did get right were mostly guesses anyway.
Mikemorveus 1 year ago
I would say question 7's answer makes the most sense. Despite that, whoever believes in this crap is completely insane!
SuperDonutTV 1 year ago
Woot! 5/9. I can has religion, etc?
Also "rewind", dipper?
Widgetas 1 year ago
i failed =D
plllll0 1 year ago
guessing alone 2/9
SuperAgnostic1 1 year ago
I got 3/9 (1,7.8) and spilled my brains to the floor
SisifosGR 1 year ago
Ouch, missed every one.
thebest3oo 1 year ago
1) WTF?
2) Errr...
3) Well, I... umm.
4) Jetskis are cool.
5) Clearly this is.....
6) I got nothing.
7) [mind blank]
8) I need a strong drink.
9) I have lost the will live.
askegg 1 year ago 25
Two test takers, we each got three different ones 'correct'.
Nice video.
furtim1 1 year ago
2 right (1 and 9) - militant atheist.
By the way..lately I have been trying to get theists which I consider intelligent enough to question their faith. Some did, but some said "though shall not take the lord's name in vane in my presence!" Got 3 people thinking so far, out of 5 I approached. I think it's a reasonably good percentage, don't you?
OricineVreauSaFiu 1 year ago
I answered: "None of the above." to all questions. I guess I just can't think like a fundy.
Gorteenminogue 1 year ago
7/10! Very full knowledge of the bible, but better intuition of what conservative Christians would probably think important and want to claim in the name of jebus.
foxholeathiest 1 year ago
HAHA! i got three! 5, 7 and 8. (atheist)
how do they come up with this stuff?
dothackyou 1 year ago
Wow, that's fascinating! So, which passage in the bible describes scientific foreknowledge of the existence of underpants gnomes?
;D
Bear5177 1 year ago
What an utter load of rubbish! Very strange article...
NotRelatedToBob 1 year ago
What the bloody hell? O_o That place has to be parody, it has to be, no one is that crazy!
brianblackberry 1 year ago
0:57
But atheist are unable to have an open mind!
VyckRo 1 year ago
@VyckRo: Remember to keep an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out.
RyuDarragh 1 year ago
Well, through mind-bendingly forcing my thought patterns into what I figured approximated the average of my family and community that I grew up in (SW Missouri, the Ozarks) for 6 of them. Then I guessed on the 4 that I had no idea what the foxtrot uniform charlie kilo it could possibly be. Now, I grew up in a Southern Baptist / Pentecostal area, so have read NIV & KJV both complete -- started questioning the bible / pastor / church @7yo. I scored 10/10 does that count, or am I just really lucky?
edeyn 1 year ago 7
Atheist always choose „Light topics” because they are not able to answer to real questions.
And they chosen for debate users as: truthfulchristian,venomfangx,dawahfilms.
Will never choose for debate, users or problems that exceeding „their intelligence”
are deplorable...
VyckRo 1 year ago
@VyckRo You type not the good. grammar are you bad. stop the posting of the comment in here.
shoopoop21 1 year ago 3
@shoopoop21
No!
VyckRo 1 year ago
@VyckRo fair enough...
shoopoop21 1 year ago
@shoopoop21 You sound just as stupid and arrogent by correcting someone of poor grammer, this is a computer not an english class. Stop being so arrogent. Some people just don't know how to spell that good. Its not a crime to have poor grammer and doesn't make them any less smart.
AstrophelTDeath 1 year ago
@AstrophelTDeath Having poor grammar and spelling actually does make them less smart. Intelligent people tend to know how to spell and have proper sentences. Such as "arrogant" and "how to spell well" not "how to spell good". Although you are correct in the fact that what I'm using is a computer. Although this is YouTube and the Internet. You get 1/2 credit for at least knowing what the thing you're staring at is. Congratulations.
JoeKerXO 1 year ago
@JoeKerXO Really ? Albert Eienstein, one of the greatest minds the world has ever known, had never even passed high school. There alot of great minds out there that don't even know how to read. Most svant's don't know how to read, yet there are incredibly smart at what they do. What I am trying to say is stop acting like you can make more of a point because you english is better. It does not prove your argument. Its a logical fallacy, to discard someone's point mearly on a few spelling errors.
AstrophelTDeath 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AstrophelTDeath @AstrophelTDeath "Really ? Albert Eienstein, one of the greatest minds the world has ever known, had never even passed high school." Yes he did, and got entry into polytechnic from which he also graduated
salerio61 1 year ago
@AstrophelTDeath I never said VyckRo was stupid. Never. If anything, my worst crime was telling to stop posting comments, though to be fair, for good reason. I cant even understand what he's trying to say..
shoopoop21 1 year ago
@VyckRo: What questions? Ones that can't be tested scientifically? Of course they won;t answer those kinds of non-sequitars. I will happlily regale you with my morals and beliefs, but a "God" or "gods" are not in them. If that is all that there is to discuss that atheists "can't answer", then the broad topic is a simplified Rorschach test of "right and wrong".
RyuDarragh 1 year ago
@RyuDarragh
morals?
without God?, morals from wher?
VyckRo 1 year ago
@VyckRo: When you say "God", I hear "College of Bishops" and "Nicean Council". Where? Common sense. Is it wrong to kill other beings who are not trying to kill you? Is it wrong to take from others what they need to survive or what they have made or purchased? No. Evolution suggests we are hardwired this way because doing so is counterproductive to survival of the species. This notion of collective morals is not "relative", it is what all humans share. I was raised to have empathy. It works.
RyuDarragh 1 year ago
@VyckRo
Morals stem from physical evolution by natural selection. If you can't grasp this concept it means you don't understand the theory of evolution, and your opinion does not matter on debates over evolution and creation. How can you debate against something you do not grasp?
And the eternal question: did god create the morals and we follow them because he says so, or are morals universal and god did not create them, he just made us aware of them (assuming the bible is moral... heh)
Roflsinternets 1 year ago
Dear lord, conservapedians are really insane.
TheLordOfTheSporks 1 year ago
my word, I never heard of conservapedia, and I hope to never hear about (or from) it again
Squival138 1 year ago
2/9 I got 5 and 8 "right"
And in the quiz itsthesuperfly talks about I got 14/15
Blackthorn2323 1 year ago
The conclusions they make from the Bible are *ahem* insane. I may have gotten 4 right, but that is just asinine.
VicariousExtrospect 1 year ago
I got zero correct. I guess that mean's I'm sane.
Desertphile 1 year ago
".... a fundamental uncertainty that requires observation to resolve, akin to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle discovered in the 1920s."
The cult has confused quantum indeterminacy with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. LOL! Funny.
Desertphile 1 year ago
4/9 by their standards
KingHeathen 1 year ago
It seems the more you know about the theory purportedly foretold, the less likely you are to ascribe it to the passage which allegedly shows foreknowledge of it. I have friends who are Christians, but this is just nutty. It is too bizarre that people who believe in such tripe are intelligent enough to turn on a computer, let alone edit a website.
antonc81 1 year ago
i got three right. WTF,this is a joke right?!! They have to be joking
zak542 1 year ago
I thought that I'd do well on this.
I was wrong.
I got 4 correct answers.
leftNullSpace 1 year ago
Only transistor radio.
zoltan6561 1 year ago
@zoltan6561 same here, what the hell are they smoking?
Nomad6763 1 year ago
4 correct seems to be a common result (I also got 4). Almost all of my answers came from trying to think like they did; ie, pull out of a body cavity.
Now were did I put that mind bleach?
jufulu 1 year ago
I got 4 right: 5, 6, 8 and 9
vollmuell 1 year ago
I only got 5 questions right. I missed questions: 4, 5, 6, and 7. I chose "B" on each of those.
uninoculated 1 year ago
1/9. Only got the first.
abaci79 1 year ago
see, all Einstien really had to do was read the bible and that would have made everything so much easier. He probably read the bible after and thought, "Aw, damn it. It was right here the whole time."
flyboy5842 1 year ago 2
that was retarded
flyboy5842 1 year ago
4/9 so I guess you owe Conservapedia an apology… but then again I am not very good at guessing.
Politikradion 1 year ago
2/9
They were: B,A,A,B,D,C,B,B,C
Question five I just completely guessed because none of them made any sense to me haha. Hope you find my answers interesting and thanks for putting this quiz up it was err interesting.
lequaie1234 1 year ago
2 out of 9. Just for reference, I got all but 1 of the Pew survey questions right.
EclipsingReligion 1 year ago
I tried my very best, but couldn't reach the twisted mindset of fundamentalists. 3/9.
jimidinh 1 year ago
6 of 9
A B D D D C B B D
So, what does this point to?
Isakawa2501 1 year ago
Only 1 right. But in my defense, I was using my brain to think about it. T_T
monitoradiation 1 year ago
my awnser to everyone of those is, canada.
gooddarkjedi 1 year ago
4 of 9
MrKuti89 1 year ago
Wow, some people had to try really really hard to come up with that! C'mon, a bunch of old coots stealing the words (they figured wise) from past cultures, compiling their very own book for their new religion, and trying to sound like they could forsee the future by thousands of years to boot? Conservapedia my ass...Don't believe everything you read.
CrankyCrone 1 year ago
I only got the 'radio' question right. Guess I'd better read my bible!
hellburger99 1 year ago
I scored zero. I found all options laughable.
zenzombie72 1 year ago
I got 5 out of 9. But then, I'm a regular contributor to the watchdog wiki RationalWiki that keeps an eye on the insanity of Conservapedia. So, I have some insight into their crazy ways of thought... and some specific foreknowledge of the answers ;)
puellanivis 1 year ago
1-5-7 correct
growXblow 1 year ago
I am going to randomly pick 8 answers just to see if I can beat people who thought about it : a, b, c, d, a, b, c, d, a
morganbath 1 year ago
@morganbath Ok, 3 out of 9. Damn. Random chance fails! Evolution is a lie! :)
morganbath 1 year ago
@morganbath btw after about 10 seconds it occured to me that as obvious as it is that my comment was sarcasm, that does not always translate in text. So before you respond, no I was not serious, and I am not trying to poe you :)
morganbath 1 year ago
i got 6, 7, and 8 right, guess im not as smart as those darn christians
SaltyWalrus60 1 year ago
2/9 about what you expect from random chance, seeing as there is in fact no connection between the statements and any science.
cobol528 1 year ago
55.5...% I guess I would fail a "Christian Science" Class...whatever the hell that would be. My honest answers were, b,b,d,d,d,c,b,b,d
Xiao6996 1 year ago
0 correct. Is there an explanation to go with this?
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
wow.. i probably would of got a better score if i DIDN'T read the questions and just picked blindly.
SBizarre 1 year ago
One!
arcanics1971 1 year ago
I managed to get number 1 and only number 1 right
TrueMetis 1 year ago
is 3 of 9 good or bad? does this mean I'm a 2 thirds less stupid than conservapedia?
Sutskoen 1 year ago
Somehow I feel a bit dumb I actually got one right..
Relloq 1 year ago
wow, I got 2 and 7 "right" lol!
shaun365 1 year ago
3 out of 9.
I think conservapedia is being written by God himself. Therefore nobody understands its transcendental logic.
SG1guru 1 year ago
I went for BBCBDABBA, scoring 4 out of 9..
Thus, though i fail at being tarded, it was only so by the narrowest of margins.
I’m really unsure how to feel about that.
X4Imonkey 1 year ago
2
How obscure hath their foresight, that their hindsight is more obscure than their faith.
See i can write bible verses too
NionDrakyr 1 year ago
Pure genius! How can one not like this quiz, I wonder.
moveste 1 year ago
Of course you know what's good about this? Even most religious people know in their heart that science is the only true source of knowledge. That's why they want to use it to justify their beliefs and latch onto it like fleas on an Elephant's back or lamprey eels on a Shark or leeches on anything. They don't really like or understand science but they do know it is greater than their weak, pathetic and false made-up Gods. They just won't admit it in public. But they have nightmares about it!
cobol528 1 year ago 2
That is ridiculous! Are these really the best ones from the Bible? It wouldn't be so bad if at least they were plausible. I think it would take a lot of double-think to believe those as any sort of prediction. Their answers are a load of shite!
cobol528 1 year ago
I went B,B,B,B,C,A,A,B,B - so 5 right.....which concerns me a little to be honest, but on the flip side..... Hallelujah! I'm saved!
What a load of old bollocks.
xtro1969 1 year ago
The US sherman tank was crap, they were "cigars" as the americans called them, they lighted up easier than a match.
TheDudeReborn 1 year ago
Its sort of cheating but I think the correct answer to all questions is -
"E - None Of The Above".
sentineljm 1 year ago 2
@sentineljm as well as "F - all of the above (including E)"
SG1guru 1 year ago
some dude obviously edited the conservapedia article for all this nonsense to be stated there, none of this can be taken seriously by even the most hardcore of deluded retards, SURELY.
neurocrater 1 year ago
@neurocrater
Ah but conservipedia prides itself in not letting anybody edit their pages. so yeah this is real xD
ryonalionthunder 1 year ago
watching this REALLY hurt-ed my fucking brain... UGH! it's so stupid! I HATE CHRISTIANITY!!!! *Burns the bible*
NeCacaluXuxultic 1 year ago
only 4 and 9 hehe
chapulinaaa 1 year ago
5,6,8 and 9 correct
Im disappointed in conservapedia, some of your made up connections made a whole bunch more since then their lame interpretations
arife06 1 year ago
The real stupidity here is not in Convservopedia's answers, it is that they couldn't come up with much better foreknowledge connections. For example, on the first one I thought for sure it would be Israel's 7 days war, and not the airplane, but convservopedia totally missed it.
Inigecko 1 year ago
7 right
GagalittlemonsterC 1 year ago
pfft dr suess had a completely accurate pre-knowledge of lol-cats. what do you think the cat in the hat fortold? it is because he was divinely inspired! dr suess is the real mesiah, down with false religions. we should revere the holy works of dr suess and the wisdom contained within his books.
ye looking back we can say that jesus walking on water is evidence of wave/particle duality. but if the bible really meant this stuff than where is the mentioning of interference patterns??
greycloud24 1 year ago
oops i meant 4 out of 9
ayo020202 1 year ago