@octubre1987 i wonder why Mhz are relevant to any CPU then... (just being ironic because i know. google for ''electromagnetic waves'', ''logic signals'', "transistors" and "clock speed" and maybe you'll learn something about why is Mhz important for measuring processing speed. by the way, almost any unit can be used as a "speed for, or, on relation to, something" unit)
How many FPS would I get with this on Crysis? Please reply quickly please. I am thinking of buying a PC with this processor. It's kinda expensive but definitely worth it. How does it run Windows 95? Thanks!
@SpyWhoLovedHimself umm, im thinkin it would do a regular 30-40fps at a reasonable resolution and perhaps medium quality if you overclock the living daylight out of it and sort or "cram" a 9800GTS in the ISA slot. i'd say its definitely worth it, unless you could go for a core 2 extreme and GTX275, but hey, pentiums always good!
Thanks, I am hoping to get a Trident TVGA 8900D, it'll cost me a good 500 quid but it's cutting edge technology and I heard it can even run Doom at 30 fps!
@ashthepokemonmaster maybe it's full of crap because i have one with windows 95 and the thing can surf the web and open stuff rather quickly even nowadays
Why people didn't used that cool graphics in the movies (like in this commerical) for games? I know that in that time were slow and stupid things, but then how did they create that graphics for movies if on games wasn't possible?
You could do it for movies for two reasons. One: people who make movies and commercials had lots of money to buy extremely expensive computers (we are talking WAAAY out of the game budget). Two: the rendering isn't real time, like in a game. Only years later has technology advanced so greatly that real time rendering on cheap commodity hardware surpasses these old professional renders.
CGI like that would have taken several minutes to render each frame on a single i486 like that. Back then CGI was rendered on a cluster of PC servers. There were better computers for this then PC's at the time. Some of them used RISC based processors. There was Amiga, Silicon Graphics and a lot of Macs were used. Realtime rendering of hollywood CGI was not possible on any system I know of in 1989.
iiam not sure if i know what your saying but the thing is that movie graphics are pre-rendered well for games you need to render the graphics on the spot when you play and that takes a lot of GPU processing but so do movies but movies have all the time they need to render and save the info
386 and 486 werent Pentium. Believe it or not Pentium was released as a 2nd gen processor. 90% of people couldnt even purchase the 386 and 486 , either because it was so expensive , or because no one would sell them.
Yes, that is the co-processor socket. I had an IBM PS/1 Consultant 2155-24M that had a PODP socket. 83Mhz Pentium OverDrive CPU FTW. Execept the ones that had the "divide-by-zero" ailment =P
And by the way, I think this must be earlier than 1993. The 33 Mhz 486 was released in 1990(slower models in 1989). The 66 Mhz dx2 was released in the summer of 1992 and the pentium in 1993. Why would they make this commercial about a cpu that is as powerful as they say in it, and not use some of the other much faster cpu;S that was available at the time, if it was 93? Probably from 91 or 92. Maybe even as early as 90,when it was released.
The 486 was probably the biggest advancement made in intel history! Integrated FPU, on-die cache, improved handling of instructions and much more.
It was ahead of it's time, win 3.1 ran lightingly fast on it and win 95 ran really good with enough of ram installed.
For a long time the 66 Mhz 486 was the minimum requirement for playing fps-games until 3d-cards took over in 97. Not bad for a 5 year old cpu, where all 3d is handled by the cpu. Which graphics card from 2003 can do that today?
Those were the days! My first PC was a 486SX/25 with 4mb. When we upgraded to a DX/66 and 8mb (4mb cost more than some laptops do now!) we were in awe. I remember playing C&C on these things. Multiplayer was the best - I had lug my tower and a 14" monitor that weighed more than I did to a friend's house and fiddle around with a null modem for 2 player action... kids today with their X-Box, they're so spoiled!
This wasn't done in 1989. Maybe 1993 or 1994. Sure, the 486 chip was announced in 89, but if you google historical prices it wasn't affordable (and the big name clone manufacturers didn't build systems around it) until the Pentium came out. Took the Pentium another 18-24 months to drop far enough in price to where small businesses and home users could justify buying one.
lol! My first PC at the time was I don't know what I might call it was given to me by my dad. It really had washed out colors but it can read CDs just fine.
funny really, because in 15 years time we'll be watching the Core 2 adverts (probably still on youtube) and laughing at how ridicolously slow they are!
I remember running a machine at my school in a computer class a year ago with a 486 processor, 16MB RAM, and Windows 95... I was amazed to see Windows 95 run quickly
It wasn't used by IBM, and had some issues that made it somewhat difficult to use on the IBM PC architecture, but some clone manufacturers used it anyway.
The 186 was essentially a computer on a chip, it was the 8086 with core logic in the same package. It was mainly used in imbedded applications, almost never in a PC.
It was hardly an SoC, but it did move more functionality onto the chip.
Various PC-compatible ASICs were designed around the 80186 design, though - if you're designing the stuff that goes around the chip, you can remove the incompatible parts, and leave the good parts.
This was actually a fun commercial to watch, although the machine I'm using to type this message most CERTAINLY has less circuitry components than the one seen in the commercial.
This was made either in 1992 or 1993. I remember Intel advertising their 486 stuff in those years.
I tried to run Call of Duty MW 3 on it last year. Its still loading. I think i will be able to play it by next christmas
smithlee07 1 month ago
inatél lá computer--insaide kkkkk
giovanni12494 3 months ago
у меня на нем DOOM летал в свое время!)))
Inarhos 4 months ago
Wow nice
NFSVIDEOCHANNEL 5 months ago
@necrocoprophilia
You're right about hyperthreading. The Pentium 4 had that too and the Athlon XP(and in some cases the Pentium 3) spanked it at every turn. :D
Jerkwad152 6 months ago
Actually the electrical signals in computers these days run just about at the speed of light so they weren't too far off from that description.
decimat777 7 months ago
light speed for DOS
wc4pwned 8 months ago 3
It runs on light speed, if light speed was 100 Mhz.....
ketchupmanor 10 months ago
@ketchupmanor yeah, especially because light speed is "speed", and 100 MHz is "frequency" ¬¬
octubre1987 10 months ago
@octubre1987 i wonder why Mhz are relevant to any CPU then... (just being ironic because i know. google for ''electromagnetic waves'', ''logic signals'', "transistors" and "clock speed" and maybe you'll learn something about why is Mhz important for measuring processing speed. by the way, almost any unit can be used as a "speed for, or, on relation to, something" unit)
WXIIIR 7 months ago
The 486 was kickass when it was brand-new. Now it's ancient and the i7 is kickass. In twenty more years, the i7 will be ancient.
Jerkwad152 10 months ago 3
Processor speeds stay relatively the same as operating systems and software become more bloated.
Banquo2 11 months ago 6
wut about core i7?
linuxuser432 11 months ago
You could run "Reversi" at light speed
dentunes 1 year ago
..it says you've got a real power source inside.. not one of those fake Styrofoam ones..
I3331934 1 year ago
Intel inside is the most often used warning label all around the world =)
sprucharchiv 1 year ago
i786 better lolz
cacingworem 1 year ago
386 and 486 era was exciting.
OK2BCK 1 year ago
Great ad still.
siddyatomica 1 year ago
Hmmm, no wonder it created a worm hole. No heatsink.
danwat1234 1 year ago
and run your software... ...at light speed! HOLY SHIT, 25MHZ!!
Now I ONLY have to wait 2 weeks for it to export a 1:20 long HD video!
AMAZING!
Nvidiaguides 1 year ago
This processor can run Crysis at 3FPY (frames per year)
PATRIENIX 1 year ago
This commercial brings back to me many nostalgic feelings.
kevinwinstonshen 1 year ago
Microchip my ass
dillmc7743 1 year ago
I want this! Can't wait.
You guys can have your i7...suckers!
JesusManson323 1 year ago 4
micro prosessor? i have one of these they are huge
nuclearbigdaddy 1 year ago
Intel Core i7-980X Extreme Edition Gulftown 3.33GHz 6 x 256KB L2 Cache 12MB L3 Cache LGA 1366 130W Six-Core Desktop Processor is god compared to this
1015287 1 year ago
lol that was my first CPU!
marzsc 1 year ago
@marzsc mine was the dx version
PlaSnake 1 year ago
i have a i486 sx
nuclearbigdaddy 1 year ago
I found one of those in a very old computer once...i glued it to a wooden stick and now its a backscratcher
elgavilan2000 1 year ago
Nobody cares about the heat dissipator? B(
AmazingDX 1 year ago
IF we can go back in time give them the Intel i7-980 6x 3333Mhz
234jari234 1 year ago 2
reply to @SMGjohn
yea cuz if blow up are cheap to replace lol
mixed123456 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fuck Intel, AMD is used by military!
SMGJohn 1 year ago
lol i went up to my uncles today he gave about 10 intel i486 processors plus a ibm and old amd processor
gta1172 2 years ago
NASA still uses 486s. they're the only CPUs that can survive re-entry lol
80stvfan09 2 years ago 45
Yes, NASA still uses the 486, and THE 386!!!!!!!! Incredible, no? Why not Install an i7 on the Hubble? =) hahah
MREURONCAP 1 year ago
@MREURONCAP Because old CPUs are rock solid in extreme conditions, an i7 would commit suicide as soon as it was loaded into a shuttle, lol
Dant2142 1 year ago 4
@Dant2142 yeah, sad true. Are the Oldies the Best? #LOL hahaha
MREURONCAP 1 year ago
my dad has one of these as a paper weight lol
mangie222 2 years ago
How many FPS would I get with this on Crysis? Please reply quickly please. I am thinking of buying a PC with this processor. It's kinda expensive but definitely worth it. How does it run Windows 95? Thanks!
SpyWhoLovedHimself 2 years ago
@SpyWhoLovedHimself umm, im thinkin it would do a regular 30-40fps at a reasonable resolution and perhaps medium quality if you overclock the living daylight out of it and sort or "cram" a 9800GTS in the ISA slot. i'd say its definitely worth it, unless you could go for a core 2 extreme and GTX275, but hey, pentiums always good!
I3331934 2 years ago
i486 Rather lol
I3331934 2 years ago
@I3331934
Thanks, I am hoping to get a Trident TVGA 8900D, it'll cost me a good 500 quid but it's cutting edge technology and I heard it can even run Doom at 30 fps!
SpyWhoLovedHimself 2 years ago
@SpyWhoLovedHimself i had the TVGA 9000 512kb a few years back!
nipperoid 1 year ago
Um. go for the i7. lol
GaryH315223 2 years ago
of what year was this?
soijiro666 2 years ago
OMG!! i 486 can hardly handle windows 95!!!!
i know because i got one that runs windows 95 and its as slow as f$%k!!
ashthepokemonmaster 2 years ago
@ashthepokemonmaster you must try Windows 3.1 LOL
cacingworem 2 years ago
i did i HATE it lol
ashthepokemonmaster 2 years ago
@ashthepokemonmaster my 486 dx 33 ran windows 98 pretty quickly :/
nipperoid 1 year ago
@ashthepokemonmaster maybe it's full of crap because i have one with windows 95 and the thing can surf the web and open stuff rather quickly even nowadays
WXIIIR 7 months ago
OMG!
I love this video!
mmarti944 2 years ago
Holy damn, this video is retro.
bcrscahh198987 2 years ago
i hear from year 2200 : "This old shit Pentium 12" ... Now u says this old shit 486 :D
HatlabuFarkas 2 years ago
Why people didn't used that cool graphics in the movies (like in this commerical) for games? I know that in that time were slow and stupid things, but then how did they create that graphics for movies if on games wasn't possible?
ComputerTutorialPro 2 years ago
You could do it for movies for two reasons. One: people who make movies and commercials had lots of money to buy extremely expensive computers (we are talking WAAAY out of the game budget). Two: the rendering isn't real time, like in a game. Only years later has technology advanced so greatly that real time rendering on cheap commodity hardware surpasses these old professional renders.
starsiegeplayer 2 years ago
It's called prerendering.
ufee 2 years ago
CGI like that would have taken several minutes to render each frame on a single i486 like that. Back then CGI was rendered on a cluster of PC servers. There were better computers for this then PC's at the time. Some of them used RISC based processors. There was Amiga, Silicon Graphics and a lot of Macs were used. Realtime rendering of hollywood CGI was not possible on any system I know of in 1989.
devildad1620 2 years ago
iiam not sure if i know what your saying but the thing is that movie graphics are pre-rendered well for games you need to render the graphics on the spot when you play and that takes a lot of GPU processing but so do movies but movies have all the time they need to render and save the info
1800Supreme 2 years ago
@ComputerTutorialPro The consoles didn't have the gpu's necessary for this kind of thing. Except maybe the Sega CD... lol
iloveoldschool 2 years ago
if that was light speed, wow whats I7
evelutionz 2 years ago 33
Warp Speed?
starsiegeplayer 2 years ago
Warp Speed? This is the computer that did the boot-up run in less than 12 minutes!
DevilDog016 2 years ago
Ludicrous speed.
silicon212 2 years ago
@evelutionz LUDICROUS SPEED :D
goqwertygo 1 year ago
@evelutionz
I7 is warp speed ;)
TheOneToxic 1 year ago
@evelutionz ludicrus speed (space balls)
WTFisJamieUp2 1 year ago
@evelutionz ridiculous speed ;-)
SFseis 11 months ago
@evelutionz
Overpriced bullshit?
systemsfailed 8 months ago
@evelutionz Cosmos destroying speed?
thebloxxeronroblox 6 months ago
@evelutionz Nuclear detonation speed.
bacovia2004 6 months ago
@evelutionz its like 25 mhz
smurf6340 6 months ago
@smurf6340 No... it's anywhere from 16mhz to 100mhz
almann1117 5 months ago
@evelutionz MEGALIGHTSPEED, DUH!
lolz
almann1117 5 months ago
I'm still using an 80386-SX for my old DOS-Games :-)
mattfeige 2 years ago
I heard people still use these for making home routers for networking and stuff, never seen a working one yet.
chucknorris687 2 years ago
My dad uses one, with win 3.1 and office 6.0 :)
wantomek 2 years ago
wow this must be fast in the bios lmao!
steavedaver 2 years ago
I had that board once, it fried. Got several working 486 cpus around.
oc5nsli341nforce4 2 years ago
my friends got old pentiums that say 1989, im guessing its one of theses.
surferstapleton 2 years ago
pentium wasn't around yet in 89... /:)
i don't even know if these were...
wantomek 2 years ago 2
i just assumed they were all pentiums, there were others that were 1992, could they be pentiums?
surferstapleton 2 years ago
the first pentium processors appeared in 94' so I guess those have to be 486 or 386 ones you are talking about.
wantomek 2 years ago
386 and 486 werent Pentium. Believe it or not Pentium was released as a 2nd gen processor. 90% of people couldnt even purchase the 386 and 486 , either because it was so expensive , or because no one would sell them.
Drudicta 2 years ago
Cyrix Perhaps, and ofcourse AMD were there 1992. but they were pretty far behind then.
Kilen81 2 years ago
No, the pentium processors were first released in 1993 I think before them there were 386 and 486 and before those two there were 286 processors
Riddle81 2 years ago
The 486 was released in 1989.
silicon212 2 years ago
lol my computer is god compared tot this lol its like dual core 3.0 ghz
thlogger 2 years ago
guessing the e8400? if thats god then my i7 is gods god
Krisisb0b 2 years ago
the new and incredible fast 33mhz processor ! the fastest in the world ! good old times.. i was really happy when i played mario on my pc .
nutzy73 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
mario on ur pc?
bluebutdude1 2 years ago
yeah, it wasn't super mario bros but a kind of... now i play super mario bros on my phone and on my psp lol
nutzy73 2 years ago
this was my 1st pc.. it took 5 minutes to open ms word 97..
xserd 3 years ago
ROTFLMBO!!!!
Gameboykd 3 years ago
Hmm, looks like the processor isn't even in the socket, lol (correct me if i'm wrong)
Dukiiiii 3 years ago
That is probably supposed to be the 487 coprocessor socket, which would have been empty on a new machine.
jakeharvey 3 years ago
Yes, that is the co-processor socket. I had an IBM PS/1 Consultant 2155-24M that had a PODP socket. 83Mhz Pentium OverDrive CPU FTW. Execept the ones that had the "divide-by-zero" ailment =P
dasobst 2 years ago 2
How the hell is that computer even running? One of the AT power connectors is off!
inclusivedisjunction 3 years ago 2
How did you notice that?
Joseph9536 3 years ago
I'm a nerd. i pay attention to all the wrong things.
inclusivedisjunction 3 years ago
Since when did this pc needed the AT power connected when it has Tesla coils for power?
I noticed that too. The old saying was with those connectors was BLACK TO BLACK.
jimmy101112000 2 years ago 2
And by the way, I think this must be earlier than 1993. The 33 Mhz 486 was released in 1990(slower models in 1989). The 66 Mhz dx2 was released in the summer of 1992 and the pentium in 1993. Why would they make this commercial about a cpu that is as powerful as they say in it, and not use some of the other much faster cpu;S that was available at the time, if it was 93? Probably from 91 or 92. Maybe even as early as 90,when it was released.
MrModulator 3 years ago
The 486 was probably the biggest advancement made in intel history! Integrated FPU, on-die cache, improved handling of instructions and much more.
It was ahead of it's time, win 3.1 ran lightingly fast on it and win 95 ran really good with enough of ram installed.
For a long time the 66 Mhz 486 was the minimum requirement for playing fps-games until 3d-cards took over in 97. Not bad for a 5 year old cpu, where all 3d is handled by the cpu. Which graphics card from 2003 can do that today?
MrModulator 3 years ago
This is not from 1989. Its from 1993.
soldersucker 3 years ago
Isn't That The New Intel Logo?
solidsnake1211 3 years ago
Those were the days! My first PC was a 486SX/25 with 4mb. When we upgraded to a DX/66 and 8mb (4mb cost more than some laptops do now!) we were in awe. I remember playing C&C on these things. Multiplayer was the best - I had lug my tower and a 14" monitor that weighed more than I did to a friend's house and fiddle around with a null modem for 2 player action... kids today with their X-Box, they're so spoiled!
pacornerpolska 3 years ago
This wasn't done in 1989. Maybe 1993 or 1994. Sure, the 486 chip was announced in 89, but if you google historical prices it wasn't affordable (and the big name clone manufacturers didn't build systems around it) until the Pentium came out. Took the Pentium another 18-24 months to drop far enough in price to where small businesses and home users could justify buying one.
sekiddy 3 years ago 2
It has 2 Soviet tesla coils next to it.
rigurat 3 years ago 5
ROFL thats what i was thinking!
thomas007 3 years ago
P.S. I don't even know what type of processor is inside this thing.
AmnAbdulla9 3 years ago
lol! My first PC at the time was I don't know what I might call it was given to me by my dad. It really had washed out colors but it can read CDs just fine.
AmnAbdulla9 3 years ago
In 20 years time a cpu will be 128k core i believe, i think thats the direction.
128k core being a 128,000 cores (probably running at 20ghz each, compared to todays measely 2/4 core.
So yes, in another 20 yrs todays computers will look like ZX spectrum.
MDEMONIC689 3 years ago 3
@MDEMONIC689 20ghz each? only if they stop making them out of bipolar silicon junctions.
WXIIIR 6 months ago
OOooOO I found one of these at school yesterday, it was 33Mhz :o
langsetboer1 3 years ago
wtf CPU has no cooling and can do your software at lightspeed O_O". I think I have a 486 with a heat sink stuck to it
PRODVDi 3 years ago
I still have an old PS/2 with an i286 here.
Freezer7Pro 3 years ago
If your willing to sell it I would be interested! I have a IBM ps/2 80386SX/16MHz and I have been looking for a 286 for some time now.
XmegaPresident 3 years ago
Maybe. I'm not 100% sure that it's a 286, but it should be. I can check tomorrow. I also don't have the scren/keyboard/mouse etc that came along.
Freezer7Pro 3 years ago
486 isnt totally useless. i use one as a midi sequencer.
jeshonias 3 years ago
At lightspeed... wow!
intelinside1990 3 years ago
funny really, because in 15 years time we'll be watching the Core 2 adverts (probably still on youtube) and laughing at how ridicolously slow they are!
rorymarsh 4 years ago
I remember running a machine at my school in a computer class a year ago with a 486 processor, 16MB RAM, and Windows 95... I was amazed to see Windows 95 run quickly
NFRANGA 4 years ago
i had a 186 and progressed through to the 486 then onto pentium computers
MKUltraProject 4 years ago
No such CPU exists. I believe you are reffering to the XT x86 cpu
111olbap 4 years ago
Actually, the 80186 does exist.
It wasn't used by IBM, and had some issues that made it somewhat difficult to use on the IBM PC architecture, but some clone manufacturers used it anyway.
bhtooefr 4 years ago 3
The PBX (telephone switchboard thingy) in my job has an 80186 inside it, albeit an AMD clone of one.
steeviebops 2 years ago
The 186 was essentially a computer on a chip, it was the 8086 with core logic in the same package. It was mainly used in imbedded applications, almost never in a PC.
silicon212 2 years ago
It was hardly an SoC, but it did move more functionality onto the chip.
Various PC-compatible ASICs were designed around the 80186 design, though - if you're designing the stuff that goes around the chip, you can remove the incompatible parts, and leave the good parts.
bhtooefr 2 years ago
486 now it's good as a door stop.
benzman69 4 years ago
It is too bulky for a door stop, a wooden door stop wedge is more useful and takes up less space :)
C1audia975 4 years ago 4
This was actually a fun commercial to watch, although the machine I'm using to type this message most CERTAINLY has less circuitry components than the one seen in the commercial.
This was made either in 1992 or 1993. I remember Intel advertising their 486 stuff in those years.
Rusty0918B 4 years ago
I remember wanting a 486 but I had to make do with a 386. I didnt have £1400 for a "multimedia" 486 as a student! LOL
LosBee 4 years ago
ufff... too old.
siemens1990 4 years ago
cheeeeziii
al3xandrul 4 years ago
lol - Ich finds witzig
GriggiWurm 4 years ago
thats so EPIC!
AndrewPasquale 4 years ago
LMAO I Have One Of Those On My Old Computer They Suck Compared To These Modern Day CPU's lol.
Eddyiskoo 4 years ago