The overall message is Ann Coulter is defending and supporting Hillary Clinton! A Republicrat and Demopublican moment that shows at the highest levels of government it's not about party but about power. Forget about party politics- ask yourself if you're more free today or if you're more controlled. I believe you know the answer. RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT!
You're way off-base. Americans are tired of making fat-cat politicians, corporations and other nations FILTHY RICH with war at the expense of American lives and tax payers hard earned money. Tyler, sounds like you want another warmonger President. Protect American lives and ring our soldiers home to defend OUR country today.
Ann Coulter in all her vile bigotry actually thinks its an insult to call someone gay. She actually thinks a candidate having gay support is something negative. And of course she believes gays hate America. Of course she would project her own prejudices and assume whoever made that that Hillary video was mocking lesbians. If you ask me, I'm convinced Ann Coulter is a total closet case.
You suggest it isn't an insult to call someone gay as a lead in to expressing your dislike of someone, then you accuse them of being gay. Your accusation was obviously not meant as a term of endearment.
In other words, you are specifically that which you complained about.
Further, Coulter's comment was in regard to the general election for the US Presidency. Love songs from teenage lesbians is, in fact, not beneficial in that context.
Hillary may be biologically a woman but in every other way she has internalized the worst qualities of the ruling class male. It is painful to contemplate the degree to which she has coerced political support from American women. More than ever before in human history women are in a position to make a better world. Women like Hillary Clinton and Ann Coulter, in their slavish imitation of men, are wasting their chances and ours.
gas vs electric there is little difference the electric car runs on? any one? anyone? not your wall! they will just have a new excuse to build more POWERplants. We need to get away from personal transit and ride bikes or walk- put the sidewalks back. get healthy consume less. STOP SHOPPING IT ONLY ENCOURAGES THEM!
If we do not get a new leader that is attuned to the 21st century, we are doomed. China, India, and india are rising quickly so along with Japan this century could be the tipping point to Asian hegemony! It is time for real AMerican Leadership! lets vote Sanely for Barack!
GOOD ONE ANN! You totally exposed how liberals are traitorous dogs who have no loyalties and will turn on each other in their godlessness! That, or the "Hot for Hilary" video was just a joke... no, impossible. Damn godless liberals!
TylerNull, you don't seem to need Liberals to belittle America, people like you are making your country look more and more ridiculous. It's sad that a biased channel like FOX is so influential, and with all this propaganda I can see how complete idiots like Ronald Reagan and George Bush could become presidents of the USA.
Coulter... shut up. Why are you still on the air? If you do your research like a real journalist, you would have the answers to your questions. She wrote, filmed, and produced it herself... dumb ass.
Siding with the USA is 'dangerous' only in the mind of a Democrat.
B. Hussein Obama is a race hustling lawyer and a very bad choice. Then again, the other 'top' Democrat candidate is the wife of a convicted felon and disbarred lawyer.
Read revelations? Postpone? Why put off the inevitable? I agree, Ron Paul is one of the guys I'm pulling for...but the bible? Really? You can't run from destiny. If you believe what it says, you must believe it ALL! If you know the day you're going to die, are you going to try to put it off, or just accept it?
You will not appease warmonging Muslims no matter if you sit on your hands, hide out, or go to war with them. Our country is trapped and in these kinds of conflicts because we reject the God of the Bible by and large in our culture.
Michael Savage actually suggested that the Islamic rage is a counterpoint sent by an angry God to kick our ass for our decadent ways. Ya know, I might agree with him on that!
God, I hate Ann Coulter. She's ridiculous. I'm a liberal, but that doesn't mean that I walk around saying that all Republicans are idiots and horrible people. I mean...come on! It's so idiotic to make general assumptions like that. Not to mention, it's POLITICS, people. Could we possibly grow up a little bit and actually work together for once? I know...kindness is one of those far-fetched ideas...but honestly.
Perhaps if he'd stop blaming America for Muslim bloodlust. Absent that, the rest of his rhetoric is meaningless. It sounds good, like the rhetoric of other politicians, but its meaningless.
It's the same as all his interviews. He blames America -- our policy (fighting back). Therefore, if he becomes President, then he must submit (talk) in response to the next attack by Islamic Fascists. Such policy is depraved and always fails.
The guy is a 20 yr incumbent politician -- of course he says things that sound good. It's called big-pimping.
He blames our policy as one of MANY factors. He never said that Islamism isn't real, of course, we all know that. I wish they weren't here (thank Ted Kennedy's immigration bill from 1965). But it's too late now, al Qaeda is here, ID cards are futile, and conventional warfare won't work. How do we take the fight to the enemy when it's so omnipresent? We might as well just brace ourselves for attacks: shock-proof our economy, stabilize the dollar, expand civil defense programs..
We can declare martial law and deport them. We can pull out of W.Asia and drop hydrogen bombs on them. We can make arrangements between Russia and China, who haven't done so only because of us, and coordinate the activity. We can rid humanity of the filth of Islam and its 1400+ year plague.
The list of things we can do to fight back far exceeds the limits of YT. Yet I have yet to hear anything but defeatist rhetoric from Ron Paul'ers.
To the 1st idea, our guns get seized and cops will abuse us like crazy, BUT my parents survived martial law, so can I. I'll concede that point.
But West Asia is just one area of Muslim involvement. AND RUSSIA? Russia is the force behind Al Qaeda. Putin is an opponent of the unipolar world concept, and he is lashing out at the US-EU for pushing it and trying to cut into Russia's oil profits. And China will dump our dollar in the event of an attack, and twist the knife in our back.
My point was not to suggest 'the solution', but that 1) there are so many alternatives besides those presented (by democrats and ron paul), 2) those presented all suggest, in their own vague ways, that we stop fighting back, and 3) the absence of any solution that includes fighting back is telling.
How DO you fight back? Russia and China (and most of the US leadership) seek our demise. And West Asia is one isolated area. The only threat that might work is...oh Lord, I can smell the end times...the Tancredo approach of taking out Mecca if they nuke a dozen cities. But some analysts on conservative radio have said that this is what Russia wants: their bombs going off in our soil - mutual destruction of US and Islam, and then old Russia picks up the pieces...
Even Ronald Reagan personally praised Paul's natl security ideas, and he also "talked" with terrorists (Arms-for-Hostages, Iran Contra). He "cut and run" from Beirut in 83, and when Iraq attacked our USS Stark, he hashed out deals instead of bombing.
At the end of the day, the leaders in Arab lands are total power whores more interested in banging hot blondes imported from Europe than Islam; they are bought and sold via American business (Abdullah, Musharraf, Mubarak, et al).
Two separate issue -- The stupidity of USA foreign policy & muslim bloodlust. My point is there is no such thing as a foreign policy that reduces muslim bloodlust, with the lone exception of submitting to it. One needn't be a history major to realize this. One of many examples is India. They surrendered a big chunk of India (now pakistan) and the filth of Islam has been warring on India for more ever since.
Fight Islam or submit. Those are the choices the plague leaves you.
But if our policies cause the rate of radicalization to go from 20% to 50%, we just did more harm than good. Not all Muslims are violent radicals; there's drugs, homos, porn, materialism over there, too. I know what you mean, though.
I guess what I'm saying is that I just can't see the US as totally submitting to Islam, although this Sharia shit has GOT to go...I say no Sharia in the US! But, for example, if I move to Turkey or Dubai, I'm not forced to pray to Mecca. It's like being black in the deep South: you'll get called names, but you'll probably still survive. If we fight 1.2 billion Muslims, we lose a dozen cities. If we don't, then does that mean that we'll be violently Islamicized? Maybe. Maybe not.
I respect your concern. I've encountered my share of freaky Muslims; they're def worth investigating. My sick logic is this: I want to move to Montana or some far-out state where, in the case of an attack on the US, I'll probably be OK. Ron Paul seems, however, like the only candidate hell-bent on shoring up the US dollar, which would get hammered in such an event, causing hyperinflation and economic chaos in ALL 50 states. Do you at least concede the latter point?
The idea of scrapping 90% of the fed bureaucracy -- including foreign policy -- is fantastic. I love it. The problem is RP's suggestion that if we act friendly, then the global problem of Islamic Fascism goes away, or that they only kill everyone else; that they'll leave us untouched. The strategy of abandoning humanity, our friends, and hiding out somewhere is not a good one.
I'm not sure that's what Paul suggested; I think he only suggested that though Islamofascism won't go away, our interventionism might help with their recruitment efforts. My fear: This govt is working WITH Al-Qaeda, not against. Tancredo said on the Monica Crowley show that nation-states are actively being replaced by global trading blocs. THIS is why we can NOT win the war on terror, because politics/business is keeping the borders OPEN so as to create a North American Union, of sorts.
We're being sacrificed by corporatist traitors (Rudy, Mitt, McCain, the Dems). These mainline candidates work for the very thinktanks opposing American sovereignty, which is the key to our security! LOL I'd vote for Tancredo, but he's too polarizing. RP is more of a compromise to both parties who will seal the borders. Abandoning others isn't good but the U.S. should worry about self-preservation, and not about the EU or Israel.
RP, along with Ronald Reagan in the 80s, was always vocal on our need for the Strategic Defense Initiative (so he's def not a Dem; you remember "Star Wars" right?) which would make the US impenetrable to foreign attack. THAT is a far better solution to anything else I've heard from hawkish Republicans. An anti-ballistic missile shield...combined with strong borders. An impenetrable America. I think that's what RP has suggested above anything else.
I'd caution against linear thinking here. War is a polarizing event. Recalling WWII, several people outside Germany joined the Nazis. Fortunately, it also motivated the good and descent, seeing that humanity was serious about fighting back, to join humanity and defeat the plague. So, let's not be so quick to declare defeat.
In fact, the problem now appears to be only that we've been far too delicate.
In WW2, you'd bomb Dresden or Hiroshima or target specific armies. If a Pole joined the SS out of fear, it was easy to defeat such pseudo-Nazis, b/c they looked forward to liberation. Not so with Moslems, who are religious moderates, who DON'T want to be liberated. If we bomb their towns, they don't look at it as the silver lining to a cloud; they go nuts. So they're gonna fight harder than the "semi-Nazis" b/c they look at our slutty culture, and they think WE are evil!
If we bomb them they will die. If those remaining alive keep fighting ('go nuts'), then we should bomb them too. This process is repeated until they stop fighting, or they're dead.
It has never not worked. Let's not argue against human nature and its historical record.
Regarding 'slutty culture', compared to theirs we are angels from heaven.
Except it didn't work against the communists in China
Or the taliban muslim extremists in Afghanistan.
"You can kill a man but you can't kill an idea", that's why Islam is so dangerous. I hate the shit out of it, truly I want them all to die painful death. Not because of the attacks of the US so much as how they treat women, but you can't kill it by bombing it. I think you have to befriend them and after a while they will become atheist like the rest of the world.
Big difference between interventionst policies and the American people.
You are basically saying that if a politician takes money from the government, it's the people's fault. If Geoge Bush would just follow the constitution none of this mess would even have been started.
An if you don't believe my opinion is fair listen to the CIA or Osama himself.
"To defeat your enemy you have to know your enemy, to know your enemy you have to talk to him" - SunTzu, greatest military leader of all time.
her voice makes my ears bleed. she's an ugly person, inside and out, male or female (LOL). one last qualification is that she likes to make money selling stupid books that retards get a kick out of.
Occasionally, Coulter has some good ideas. You can't condemn the entire body of her work. She's a UMich Law grad, so c'mon...she might offend you, but to say she's dumb is just disingenuous. If you believe someone's a danger, never underestimate their intelligence.
"Liberals have been very successful at regressing our nation toward their socialist utopian cesspool because candy-ass conservatives refuse to acknowledge the purposeful treachery of Liberalism and fight back." -- TylerNull, YouTube 7/2007
The eventual goal of both parties is to merge supercapitalism and communism. One party does the usual socialist welfare crap; the other prepares the world for GLOBAL socialism through warfare and control of resources and markets and/or by merging govt with big business to monopolize production and consumption.
she needs to stick to writing columns. When she appears on Fox she often makes the most ridiculous comments on things.
I also think she is completly delusional to say that this is 'the left's' attempt to undermine her campaign. Her and other conservatives want the Democratic party to collapse into infighting, that'll probably be the only thing that will give a Republican candidate a chance at '08.
1st off you assume that ann coulter can actually write. You know that rumsfeld is writing her books now. And she has mark foley in charge of her talking points. Old republicans dont go away they come back as even worse nightmares. Look at newt
I don't pay attention to FoxNews much since I'm not a huge Murdoch fan, so this is the first I'm really seeing of Ann Coulter. Um. Wow. A bit of a homophobe, isn't she? She also needs a bit of a reality check. Not everything is a conspiracy. o.o I find it odd that someone like this is an idol to so many people when it appears that she personifies the very worst qualities in the human psyche.
Rethuglicans aren't stupid. They are just ridiculously stubborn. They would rather continue their unbelivably incompetent policies than do what is right for our troops and the American people. Oh, but they would have to admit they were wrong.
Plipp - Defending our nation is considered 'incompetent policies' only by Democrats and Jihadists. If you're ready to pull out of W.Asia and nuke the filth of Islam into submission, then step up and say so. Otherwise, all but the dullest of American minds will continue to reject the Democrat's endless rephrases for surrender.
That is true, but most of America was fine with the war too. Are you saying America is just as much to blame? Wake up. If someone tells you to eat a piece of chocolate, and you eat it just to find it's dog crap, are you not supposed to be mad at the guy who told you it was chocolate? Bush lied to us, including the people who voted to go to war. Get real.
Most of America is not privy to the kind of sensitive information that the elitists (Clinton, Edwards, Obama, Romney, Giuliani, McCain, but NOT Ron Paul) have. The media lied to us, so of course it's not our fault.
But you think Bush lied to the Democrats and they just bought it hook, line, and sinker? The Dems and Reps belong to the SAME elitist think-tanks redrawing the Middle East. I think people knew EXACTLY what was going on...and that the whole thing was a lie.
Bush lies to no one in his inner circle. They're all buddies. Ever go to trial and watch the adversarial lawyers duke it out, only to then see them walking away at the end and patting eachother on the back for a job well done while making country club dinner plans? It's a sham Dem vs. Rep showdown.
By the way, I can't STAND Bush. I'm with you 100% on the cocoa dogshit analogy.
I see. I'm not so sure if the dems are in on it. I'm sure some are, but I must go back to the whole electric car analogy. I work for Southwest Research Institute, and I saw the work we were doing during Clinton, and a lot of it was alternative energy, especially automotive. And Gas was cheap then! Now, Bush killed all of that. We no longer look for alternatives. It's all ways to just stretch our gas consumption. To still use it, but more slowly.
And think of this. If we are running out of gas, how come we are still building gas stations? I see them popping up all over the place. That's like having a wheat shortage, and having bakeries pop up all over the country at the same time. It doesn't add up. And I like that phrase, "creative suicide". Never heard of that, just "fashionable suicide" aka, smoking.
the stone age did not end because we ran out of stones and the Oil age will not end because we run out of oil, but because we will find a better alternative. I hope America wakes up and vote fro the best person in the next election Barack Obama!
No more war. No more Liars! how about a Uniter? How getting a wise person in for a change!
Haha. I only wish we could call thi the oil age. I wish more people would wake up to the fact that we're still in the dark ages. When in the hell did people think that ended? Please don't tell me the enlightenment already happened. There will be nothing to look forward to.
Ann is such a bitch and SO lame. What qualifications does she have to talk about ANYTHING, other than being a right wing, ass-backward, nut-job? Hopefully she'll soon follow Jerry Falwell. ...Actually, hopefully GW and Cheney will soon follow Falwell and THEN Ann follows them. Stupid republican fucks.
Therein is the Liberal Utopian vision -- zero-tolerance for dissent. From their visionaries like John Lennon and Pol Pot, the theme remains constant to this day. It's how we know it is not just a political ideology, but a religion. Liberals see their beliefs as holy writ. To question them is heresy, and makes one worthy of death, at least in their obedient Liberal mind.
Actually a lot of liberals don't have religion, as your Ann Cuntler has described in her book. Most atheists are liberal. And it's not like they have zero tolerance for anyone who disagrees. They have zero tolerance for the Nazi-esque thinking of the conservatives, white supremacy and such. Conservatives hate illegals, the same way people used to hate the Irish. Now the Irish have become conservative. What a world.
Nazi-esque thinking of Conservatives? lol, yeah you're real fair and balanced there. there are ideologues on both sides. also, most atheists may be liberal but most liberals are not atheists. and Conservatives do not hate illegals, they want controlled borders and a working immigration policy, as do most people in every country. and the Irish have always been relatively conservative due to their catholicism which is why certain liberals are hostile to religion and its moral teachings.
I never said I was fair and balanced, never said my name was Fox News. And yes, conservatives do hate illegals. I live in Texas, I hear it ALL THE TIME. These cowboy folk think their shit don't stink and that they were here before the Mexicans. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. And when I say conservative, I really mean Texas conservatives. Then again, the US is run by a Texas conservative. And don't think I hate Bush, just the opposite. I'm absolutely terrified of him.
So you're intolerant of the Texas conservative? as for the President, he is incredibly liberal when it comes to border crossings and actually toyed with the idea of an open border policy before 911. and i doubt Texas Conservatives are any less tolerant of Mexicans than Mexicans are of Guatemalans and others who try to cross their Southern border.
Where did I say I was intolerant? Please hightlight it and send it to me. I have family members who are Texas conservatives. As for Mexicans being intolerant of Guatemalans, it just proves us humans are horrible animals. It makes me sad. So many people preach the bible but neglect the sermon on the mount. Why do they always neglect to listen to the sermon on the mount?
Let me say that that I am very impressed with your responses though. Most people resort to name calling and cussing. Gives me hope that some people actually reason through arguments.
yes, having passion over an issue is not a problem. Resorting to name calling and labeling people degrade our political culture and ability to rationalize. I see myself as conservative ( a CT conservative ;) ) but I am not a big fan of Anne Coulters tactics. As for human nature, I believe we are creatures of good and always strive to better ourselves. but we are easily distracted, especially from the sermon on the mount.
He is a CT Yankee blueblood frat boy, and his dude ranch is a Hollywood prop.
Bush is actually quite a socialist (he's pro-Wilsonian nation building, pro-progressive taxation, pro-centralized education, a borderless globalistically oriented US).
Republicans and Dems are both Marxists - and part of a Hegelian trick to control all resources and live off OUR sweat.
Why do conservatives always use "liberal" like a curse word? If anything it's something to be proud of. And for republicans to use it as a curse word is just plain out retarded.
The US have two parties, one socially liberal/liberal and the other economically liberal/conservative. Both parties have major influences from that part of the ideology.
I mean just take the fact that republican party is part of the largest liberal organization in the world.
But modern Republicans (called neo-cons as opposed to paleocons like me) are just like Ron Paul said to Hannity "ex-democrats who have taken over the GOP". They're liberals, too...just in a much more complex way.
A Connecticut native, Coulter graduated with honors from Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences, and received her J.D. from University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review.
Coulter clerked for the Honorable Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and was an attorney in the Department of Justice Honors Program for outstanding law school graduates.
After practicing law in private practice in New York City, Coulter worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan. From there, she became a litigator with the Center For Individual Rights in Washington, DC, a public interest law firm dedicated to the defense of individual rights with particular emphasis on freedom of speech, civil rights, and the free exercise of religion.
Let's see here. What is the nicest way that I can put this without being booted off of youtube for being too inappropriate?
Ann Coulter in one word? it is a four letter word that starts with a capitol "C"!
crazykipspsychoward 3 years ago
CUTE
TylerNull 3 years ago
The overall message is Ann Coulter is defending and supporting Hillary Clinton! A Republicrat and Demopublican moment that shows at the highest levels of government it's not about party but about power. Forget about party politics- ask yourself if you're more free today or if you're more controlled. I believe you know the answer. RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT!
FutureIsNowTV 4 years ago
Ron Paul = Dhimmitude
The only question is will he apologize to the Islamist brats before their next murderous temper tantrum, or will he wait until afterwards.
TylerNull 4 years ago
You're way off-base. Americans are tired of making fat-cat politicians, corporations and other nations FILTHY RICH with war at the expense of American lives and tax payers hard earned money. Tyler, sounds like you want another warmonger President. Protect American lives and ring our soldiers home to defend OUR country today.
FutureIsNowTV 4 years ago
Ron Paul recites Islamist propaganda to blame the victim of Muslim bloodlust for Muslim bloodlust.
Not even your Leftist-aligned, Islamist-aligned post can change that sad fact.
TylerNull 4 years ago
well said and keep saying what your saying its the unfortunate truth and its surprising how so few realize it
Hellaciousoutlaw 3 years ago
Ann Coulter in all her vile bigotry actually thinks its an insult to call someone gay. She actually thinks a candidate having gay support is something negative. And of course she believes gays hate America. Of course she would project her own prejudices and assume whoever made that that Hillary video was mocking lesbians. If you ask me, I'm convinced Ann Coulter is a total closet case.
LaLi66 4 years ago
You suggest it isn't an insult to call someone gay as a lead in to expressing your dislike of someone, then you accuse them of being gay. Your accusation was obviously not meant as a term of endearment.
In other words, you are specifically that which you complained about.
Further, Coulter's comment was in regard to the general election for the US Presidency. Love songs from teenage lesbians is, in fact, not beneficial in that context.
TylerNull 4 years ago
Obama gets coverage and he is ten times worse...he and his mentor beleive White people invented AIDS to genocide Black people
bobalu10 3 years ago
I am proud to say, Ann is my child.
AmericanofTruth 4 years ago
So I c the GOP strategy is to view reality completely upside down to help cope with the fact that they're in a hopeless minority.
Sucks
LibertarianViewer 4 years ago
I would like to have a Vulcan mind meld with Ann Coulter, but I'm afraid she'd hurt me. Gotta love her!
Cerebus555 4 years ago
I love ANN
VRWC01 4 years ago
Go Ann. She's so pretty.
RobertGary1 4 years ago
Hillary may be biologically a woman but in every other way she has internalized the worst qualities of the ruling class male. It is painful to contemplate the degree to which she has coerced political support from American women. More than ever before in human history women are in a position to make a better world. Women like Hillary Clinton and Ann Coulter, in their slavish imitation of men, are wasting their chances and ours.
drivenbitch 4 years ago
i dont know what tat means but as long as obama dont win, we wouldnt want a black man who will promote the ghetto running this country
hoboslayer 4 years ago
What a sick little mind you have. I'll just bet your knuckles drag along the ground, too!
drivenbitch 4 years ago
gas vs electric there is little difference the electric car runs on? any one? anyone? not your wall! they will just have a new excuse to build more POWERplants. We need to get away from personal transit and ride bikes or walk- put the sidewalks back. get healthy consume less. STOP SHOPPING IT ONLY ENCOURAGES THEM!
friendsofthefruitsof 4 years ago
If we do not get a new leader that is attuned to the 21st century, we are doomed. China, India, and india are rising quickly so along with Japan this century could be the tipping point to Asian hegemony! It is time for real AMerican Leadership! lets vote Sanely for Barack!
friendsofthefruitsof 4 years ago
Fox News is backing Clinton.
Having Ann Coulterguist attack her does her a big favor.
genYprogressive 4 years ago
I fucking hate this whore!!!
awkturtleed87 4 years ago
Ann is totally hot. I'm going to give her some serious lovin' (If I hit the love lottery!)
prrolg 4 years ago
uuurghhhh! ann coulter is horrible! she looks like death! she's so manly and gaunt
questionmark27 4 years ago 2
GOOD ONE ANN! You totally exposed how liberals are traitorous dogs who have no loyalties and will turn on each other in their godlessness! That, or the "Hot for Hilary" video was just a joke... no, impossible. Damn godless liberals!
HastaFatum 4 years ago
TylerNull, you don't seem to need Liberals to belittle America, people like you are making your country look more and more ridiculous. It's sad that a biased channel like FOX is so influential, and with all this propaganda I can see how complete idiots like Ronald Reagan and George Bush could become presidents of the USA.
jaybee61 4 years ago 3
How so?
TylerNull 4 years ago
..by completely brainwashing those who do not take the trouble of watching other, more objective news channels besides Fox.
jaybee61 4 years ago
Hillary goes both ways. In and out of bed. She has no moral base... She just wants to ride this country on top.
tdsinco 4 years ago
Coulter... shut up. Why are you still on the air? If you do your research like a real journalist, you would have the answers to your questions. She wrote, filmed, and produced it herself... dumb ass.
erosbarakiel 4 years ago
a guy with long hair named "ann" seems to go against the "family values" party
arlopickens 4 years ago
Almost 1 million iraqs are dead as a result of this illegal war. Hilary is now relaxing on vacation while our soliders are dying... Vote Gravel 08!
kyeot 4 years ago
Only in the minds of devout Liberals is Muslim on Muslim violence the fault of America.
<b>Liberals NEVER miss an opportunity to belittle America, American soldiers, or the war effort.</b>
TylerNull 4 years ago
Tyler, you are dangerous.
Obama '08!
givingvoice2003 4 years ago 2
Siding with the USA is 'dangerous' only in the mind of a Democrat.
B. Hussein Obama is a race hustling lawyer and a very bad choice. Then again, the other 'top' Democrat candidate is the wife of a convicted felon and disbarred lawyer.
TylerNull 4 years ago
Keep believing your own BULLSHIT. You are pitiful!
givingvoice2003 4 years ago
Observation of historical fact is not about belief. Give reality a try rather than complain anytime anyone acknowledges it.
TylerNull 4 years ago
ann coulter ur an idiot. dumb bitch.
iscorpio 4 years ago
Tancredo 2008
ConsensusTrance 4 years ago
Ron Paul's a dip****.
nathanielmwhite 4 years ago
Read the Bible...especially Revelations.
It is coming to pass, and Ron Paul is the best way to postpone it.
Although I like Hunter and Tancredo as well..
gablio77 4 years ago
Read revelations? Postpone? Why put off the inevitable? I agree, Ron Paul is one of the guys I'm pulling for...but the bible? Really? You can't run from destiny. If you believe what it says, you must believe it ALL! If you know the day you're going to die, are you going to try to put it off, or just accept it?
gergc36 4 years ago
Touche on the Bible part.
It's just I hate the thought of having to attempt creative suicide at some point in the future..lol
gablio77 4 years ago
Ann is an idiot. Taryn made that video for a joke and she even said that she'll vote for Hillary.
Saruzu 4 years ago
You will not appease warmonging Muslims no matter if you sit on your hands, hide out, or go to war with them. Our country is trapped and in these kinds of conflicts because we reject the God of the Bible by and large in our culture.
daniel000047 4 years ago
Michael Savage actually suggested that the Islamic rage is a counterpoint sent by an angry God to kick our ass for our decadent ways. Ya know, I might agree with him on that!
gablio77 4 years ago
God, I hate Ann Coulter. She's ridiculous. I'm a liberal, but that doesn't mean that I walk around saying that all Republicans are idiots and horrible people. I mean...come on! It's so idiotic to make general assumptions like that. Not to mention, it's POLITICS, people. Could we possibly grow up a little bit and actually work together for once? I know...kindness is one of those far-fetched ideas...but honestly.
act4me 4 years ago
Wow its a joke vid get over it
JMullay16 4 years ago
Vote for the only real republican running...
RON PAUL THE CHAMPION OF THE CONSTITUTION!
naturewalkz 4 years ago
Perhaps if he'd stop blaming America for Muslim bloodlust. Absent that, the rest of his rhetoric is meaningless. It sounds good, like the rhetoric of other politicians, but its meaningless.
TylerNull 4 years ago
if you were to watch "Ron Pauls interview @ google" on youtube, you will give your vote to him!!!
watch it then comment here...
RP 08 FTW!!!
naturewalkz 4 years ago
It's the same as all his interviews. He blames America -- our policy (fighting back). Therefore, if he becomes President, then he must submit (talk) in response to the next attack by Islamic Fascists. Such policy is depraved and always fails.
The guy is a 20 yr incumbent politician -- of course he says things that sound good. It's called big-pimping.
TylerNull 4 years ago
He blames our policy as one of MANY factors. He never said that Islamism isn't real, of course, we all know that. I wish they weren't here (thank Ted Kennedy's immigration bill from 1965). But it's too late now, al Qaeda is here, ID cards are futile, and conventional warfare won't work. How do we take the fight to the enemy when it's so omnipresent? We might as well just brace ourselves for attacks: shock-proof our economy, stabilize the dollar, expand civil defense programs..
gablio77 4 years ago
We can declare martial law and deport them. We can pull out of W.Asia and drop hydrogen bombs on them. We can make arrangements between Russia and China, who haven't done so only because of us, and coordinate the activity. We can rid humanity of the filth of Islam and its 1400+ year plague.
The list of things we can do to fight back far exceeds the limits of YT. Yet I have yet to hear anything but defeatist rhetoric from Ron Paul'ers.
TylerNull 4 years ago
To the 1st idea, our guns get seized and cops will abuse us like crazy, BUT my parents survived martial law, so can I. I'll concede that point.
But West Asia is just one area of Muslim involvement. AND RUSSIA? Russia is the force behind Al Qaeda. Putin is an opponent of the unipolar world concept, and he is lashing out at the US-EU for pushing it and trying to cut into Russia's oil profits. And China will dump our dollar in the event of an attack, and twist the knife in our back.
gablio77 4 years ago
My point was not to suggest 'the solution', but that 1) there are so many alternatives besides those presented (by democrats and ron paul), 2) those presented all suggest, in their own vague ways, that we stop fighting back, and 3) the absence of any solution that includes fighting back is telling.
TylerNull 4 years ago
Well, what are the solutions?
How DO you fight back? Russia and China (and most of the US leadership) seek our demise. And West Asia is one isolated area. The only threat that might work is...oh Lord, I can smell the end times...the Tancredo approach of taking out Mecca if they nuke a dozen cities. But some analysts on conservative radio have said that this is what Russia wants: their bombs going off in our soil - mutual destruction of US and Islam, and then old Russia picks up the pieces...
gablio77 4 years ago
GO RON GO!!!
learn more about what u speak!!!
ugh!!!
naturewalkz 4 years ago
Even Ronald Reagan personally praised Paul's natl security ideas, and he also "talked" with terrorists (Arms-for-Hostages, Iran Contra). He "cut and run" from Beirut in 83, and when Iraq attacked our USS Stark, he hashed out deals instead of bombing.
At the end of the day, the leaders in Arab lands are total power whores more interested in banging hot blondes imported from Europe than Islam; they are bought and sold via American business (Abdullah, Musharraf, Mubarak, et al).
gablio77 4 years ago
Two separate issue -- The stupidity of USA foreign policy & muslim bloodlust. My point is there is no such thing as a foreign policy that reduces muslim bloodlust, with the lone exception of submitting to it. One needn't be a history major to realize this. One of many examples is India. They surrendered a big chunk of India (now pakistan) and the filth of Islam has been warring on India for more ever since.
Fight Islam or submit. Those are the choices the plague leaves you.
TylerNull 4 years ago
Policies don't reduce Moslem bloodlust.
But if our policies cause the rate of radicalization to go from 20% to 50%, we just did more harm than good. Not all Muslims are violent radicals; there's drugs, homos, porn, materialism over there, too. I know what you mean, though.
gablio77 4 years ago
I guess what I'm saying is that I just can't see the US as totally submitting to Islam, although this Sharia shit has GOT to go...I say no Sharia in the US! But, for example, if I move to Turkey or Dubai, I'm not forced to pray to Mecca. It's like being black in the deep South: you'll get called names, but you'll probably still survive. If we fight 1.2 billion Muslims, we lose a dozen cities. If we don't, then does that mean that we'll be violently Islamicized? Maybe. Maybe not.
gablio77 4 years ago
I respect your concern. I've encountered my share of freaky Muslims; they're def worth investigating. My sick logic is this: I want to move to Montana or some far-out state where, in the case of an attack on the US, I'll probably be OK. Ron Paul seems, however, like the only candidate hell-bent on shoring up the US dollar, which would get hammered in such an event, causing hyperinflation and economic chaos in ALL 50 states. Do you at least concede the latter point?
gablio77 4 years ago
Re: ron paul / montana
The idea of scrapping 90% of the fed bureaucracy -- including foreign policy -- is fantastic. I love it. The problem is RP's suggestion that if we act friendly, then the global problem of Islamic Fascism goes away, or that they only kill everyone else; that they'll leave us untouched. The strategy of abandoning humanity, our friends, and hiding out somewhere is not a good one.
TylerNull 4 years ago
I'm not sure that's what Paul suggested; I think he only suggested that though Islamofascism won't go away, our interventionism might help with their recruitment efforts. My fear: This govt is working WITH Al-Qaeda, not against. Tancredo said on the Monica Crowley show that nation-states are actively being replaced by global trading blocs. THIS is why we can NOT win the war on terror, because politics/business is keeping the borders OPEN so as to create a North American Union, of sorts.
gablio77 4 years ago
We're being sacrificed by corporatist traitors (Rudy, Mitt, McCain, the Dems). These mainline candidates work for the very thinktanks opposing American sovereignty, which is the key to our security! LOL I'd vote for Tancredo, but he's too polarizing. RP is more of a compromise to both parties who will seal the borders. Abandoning others isn't good but the U.S. should worry about self-preservation, and not about the EU or Israel.
gablio77 4 years ago
RP, along with Ronald Reagan in the 80s, was always vocal on our need for the Strategic Defense Initiative (so he's def not a Dem; you remember "Star Wars" right?) which would make the US impenetrable to foreign attack. THAT is a far better solution to anything else I've heard from hawkish Republicans. An anti-ballistic missile shield...combined with strong borders. An impenetrable America. I think that's what RP has suggested above anything else.
gablio77 4 years ago
Re: rate of radicalization
I'd caution against linear thinking here. War is a polarizing event. Recalling WWII, several people outside Germany joined the Nazis. Fortunately, it also motivated the good and descent, seeing that humanity was serious about fighting back, to join humanity and defeat the plague. So, let's not be so quick to declare defeat.
In fact, the problem now appears to be only that we've been far too delicate.
TylerNull 4 years ago
In WW2, you'd bomb Dresden or Hiroshima or target specific armies. If a Pole joined the SS out of fear, it was easy to defeat such pseudo-Nazis, b/c they looked forward to liberation. Not so with Moslems, who are religious moderates, who DON'T want to be liberated. If we bomb their towns, they don't look at it as the silver lining to a cloud; they go nuts. So they're gonna fight harder than the "semi-Nazis" b/c they look at our slutty culture, and they think WE are evil!
gablio77 4 years ago
If we bomb them they will die. If those remaining alive keep fighting ('go nuts'), then we should bomb them too. This process is repeated until they stop fighting, or they're dead.
It has never not worked. Let's not argue against human nature and its historical record.
Regarding 'slutty culture', compared to theirs we are angels from heaven.
TylerNull 4 years ago
Except it didn't work against the communists in China
Or the taliban muslim extremists in Afghanistan.
"You can kill a man but you can't kill an idea", that's why Islam is so dangerous. I hate the shit out of it, truly I want them all to die painful death. Not because of the attacks of the US so much as how they treat women, but you can't kill it by bombing it. I think you have to befriend them and after a while they will become atheist like the rest of the world.
Visfen 4 years ago
Define "them." You want to annihilate 30 nations, kill 1.2 billion, and have no consequences? We can't even handle Iraq!
You do realize, then, that the ones that are here with white skin and blue eyes (ever hear of Albanian muslims) will nuke 20 cities in response.
gablio77 4 years ago
Befriend your Enemies and They Won't Be Enemies any More - unknown 2007
Visfen 4 years ago
Big difference between interventionst policies and the American people.
You are basically saying that if a politician takes money from the government, it's the people's fault. If Geoge Bush would just follow the constitution none of this mess would even have been started.
An if you don't believe my opinion is fair listen to the CIA or Osama himself.
"To defeat your enemy you have to know your enemy, to know your enemy you have to talk to him" - SunTzu, greatest military leader of all time.
Visfen 4 years ago
her voice makes my ears bleed. she's an ugly person, inside and out, male or female (LOL). one last qualification is that she likes to make money selling stupid books that retards get a kick out of.
caliwmn760 4 years ago
Wow. I am in awe of your well-reasoned, relevant, and thoughtful arguments. You've certainly convinced me.
Or, if this is more your level: you suck (LOL).
caspianxth 4 years ago
convinced you of what? that you're a retard. ok, i guess.
caliwmn760 4 years ago
LOL, the reason you do not like her is because she is smart and not a talking head for the democratic machine. Wake up!!
wo4091 4 years ago
1st of all Ann Coulter is not "smart". She is an idiot and so is anyone that agrees with her. If you think I'm wrong, Get Over It!
caliwmn760 4 years ago
Occasionally, Coulter has some good ideas. You can't condemn the entire body of her work. She's a UMich Law grad, so c'mon...she might offend you, but to say she's dumb is just disingenuous. If you believe someone's a danger, never underestimate their intelligence.
gablio77 4 years ago
I do not think your wrong, i know you are..You are a typical, tyranical talking head democrat..You see dictators act the same as you.
wo4091 4 years ago
Actually she is a talking head for the Democratic machine, in particular: the International Democratic Union.
gablio77 4 years ago
"Conservatives are p*ssies" - Ann Coulter, Vanity Fair 3 /2007
llStopBushNowll 4 years ago
"Liberals have been very successful at regressing our nation toward their socialist utopian cesspool because candy-ass conservatives refuse to acknowledge the purposeful treachery of Liberalism and fight back." -- TylerNull, YouTube 7/2007
TylerNull 4 years ago
Republicans AND Democrats are socialists!
The eventual goal of both parties is to merge supercapitalism and communism. One party does the usual socialist welfare crap; the other prepares the world for GLOBAL socialism through warfare and control of resources and markets and/or by merging govt with big business to monopolize production and consumption.
gablio77 4 years ago
Suggesting she's a lesbian... oh noes!
teensypeep 4 years ago
no, i want hillary on top of the hill
supermondooobercool 4 years ago
talk about overanalyzing the vid. Ann Coulter is sick
Faglia 4 years ago
Ann Coulter *sigh*
she needs to stick to writing columns. When she appears on Fox she often makes the most ridiculous comments on things.
I also think she is completly delusional to say that this is 'the left's' attempt to undermine her campaign. Her and other conservatives want the Democratic party to collapse into infighting, that'll probably be the only thing that will give a Republican candidate a chance at '08.
Puritan1985 4 years ago
1st off you assume that ann coulter can actually write. You know that rumsfeld is writing her books now. And she has mark foley in charge of her talking points. Old republicans dont go away they come back as even worse nightmares. Look at newt
BillReef 4 years ago
Democrats are just as bad, dude..
Ron Paul 2008
gablio77 4 years ago
I don't pay attention to FoxNews much since I'm not a huge Murdoch fan, so this is the first I'm really seeing of Ann Coulter. Um. Wow. A bit of a homophobe, isn't she? She also needs a bit of a reality check. Not everything is a conspiracy. o.o I find it odd that someone like this is an idol to so many people when it appears that she personifies the very worst qualities in the human psyche.
Celyia 4 years ago
Rethuglicans aren't stupid. They are just ridiculously stubborn. They would rather continue their unbelivably incompetent policies than do what is right for our troops and the American people. Oh, but they would have to admit they were wrong.
Phlipper12 4 years ago
Plipp - Defending our nation is considered 'incompetent policies' only by Democrats and Jihadists. If you're ready to pull out of W.Asia and nuke the filth of Islam into submission, then step up and say so. Otherwise, all but the dullest of American minds will continue to reject the Democrat's endless rephrases for surrender.
TylerNull 4 years ago
What is being done to our troops, was faciliated by - I'm sorry - Democrats like Clinton as well (they all authorized the war).
gablio77 4 years ago
That is true, but most of America was fine with the war too. Are you saying America is just as much to blame? Wake up. If someone tells you to eat a piece of chocolate, and you eat it just to find it's dog crap, are you not supposed to be mad at the guy who told you it was chocolate? Bush lied to us, including the people who voted to go to war. Get real.
gergc36 4 years ago
Most of America is not privy to the kind of sensitive information that the elitists (Clinton, Edwards, Obama, Romney, Giuliani, McCain, but NOT Ron Paul) have. The media lied to us, so of course it's not our fault.
But you think Bush lied to the Democrats and they just bought it hook, line, and sinker? The Dems and Reps belong to the SAME elitist think-tanks redrawing the Middle East. I think people knew EXACTLY what was going on...and that the whole thing was a lie.
gablio77 4 years ago
Bush lies to no one in his inner circle. They're all buddies. Ever go to trial and watch the adversarial lawyers duke it out, only to then see them walking away at the end and patting eachother on the back for a job well done while making country club dinner plans? It's a sham Dem vs. Rep showdown.
By the way, I can't STAND Bush. I'm with you 100% on the cocoa dogshit analogy.
gablio77 4 years ago
I see. I'm not so sure if the dems are in on it. I'm sure some are, but I must go back to the whole electric car analogy. I work for Southwest Research Institute, and I saw the work we were doing during Clinton, and a lot of it was alternative energy, especially automotive. And Gas was cheap then! Now, Bush killed all of that. We no longer look for alternatives. It's all ways to just stretch our gas consumption. To still use it, but more slowly.
gergc36 4 years ago
And think of this. If we are running out of gas, how come we are still building gas stations? I see them popping up all over the place. That's like having a wheat shortage, and having bakeries pop up all over the country at the same time. It doesn't add up. And I like that phrase, "creative suicide". Never heard of that, just "fashionable suicide" aka, smoking.
gergc36 4 years ago
I don't doubt what you're saying at all.
Just read the writings of carroll quigley, a Clinton mentor, and what he had to say about distinctions between the parties...please look him up.
gablio77 4 years ago
the stone age did not end because we ran out of stones and the Oil age will not end because we run out of oil, but because we will find a better alternative. I hope America wakes up and vote fro the best person in the next election Barack Obama!
No more war. No more Liars! how about a Uniter? How getting a wise person in for a change!
friendsofthefruitsof 4 years ago
Haha. I only wish we could call thi the oil age. I wish more people would wake up to the fact that we're still in the dark ages. When in the hell did people think that ended? Please don't tell me the enlightenment already happened. There will be nothing to look forward to.
gergc36 4 years ago
Ann is such a bitch and SO lame. What qualifications does she have to talk about ANYTHING, other than being a right wing, ass-backward, nut-job? Hopefully she'll soon follow Jerry Falwell. ...Actually, hopefully GW and Cheney will soon follow Falwell and THEN Ann follows them. Stupid republican fucks.
kagenoyuushi 4 years ago
Therein is the Liberal Utopian vision -- zero-tolerance for dissent. From their visionaries like John Lennon and Pol Pot, the theme remains constant to this day. It's how we know it is not just a political ideology, but a religion. Liberals see their beliefs as holy writ. To question them is heresy, and makes one worthy of death, at least in their obedient Liberal mind.
TylerNull 4 years ago
Pol Pot didn't mean to kill 2 million people, he just wanted to scare them a little.
kagenoyuushi 4 years ago
You're a real Nutcase Kid. Really nuts.
shaire99 4 years ago
Actually a lot of liberals don't have religion, as your Ann Cuntler has described in her book. Most atheists are liberal. And it's not like they have zero tolerance for anyone who disagrees. They have zero tolerance for the Nazi-esque thinking of the conservatives, white supremacy and such. Conservatives hate illegals, the same way people used to hate the Irish. Now the Irish have become conservative. What a world.
gergc36 4 years ago
Nazi-esque thinking of Conservatives? lol, yeah you're real fair and balanced there. there are ideologues on both sides. also, most atheists may be liberal but most liberals are not atheists. and Conservatives do not hate illegals, they want controlled borders and a working immigration policy, as do most people in every country. and the Irish have always been relatively conservative due to their catholicism which is why certain liberals are hostile to religion and its moral teachings.
Daemonocracy 4 years ago
I never said I was fair and balanced, never said my name was Fox News. And yes, conservatives do hate illegals. I live in Texas, I hear it ALL THE TIME. These cowboy folk think their shit don't stink and that they were here before the Mexicans. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. And when I say conservative, I really mean Texas conservatives. Then again, the US is run by a Texas conservative. And don't think I hate Bush, just the opposite. I'm absolutely terrified of him.
gergc36 4 years ago
So you're intolerant of the Texas conservative? as for the President, he is incredibly liberal when it comes to border crossings and actually toyed with the idea of an open border policy before 911. and i doubt Texas Conservatives are any less tolerant of Mexicans than Mexicans are of Guatemalans and others who try to cross their Southern border.
Daemonocracy 4 years ago
Where did I say I was intolerant? Please hightlight it and send it to me. I have family members who are Texas conservatives. As for Mexicans being intolerant of Guatemalans, it just proves us humans are horrible animals. It makes me sad. So many people preach the bible but neglect the sermon on the mount. Why do they always neglect to listen to the sermon on the mount?
gergc36 4 years ago
Let me say that that I am very impressed with your responses though. Most people resort to name calling and cussing. Gives me hope that some people actually reason through arguments.
gergc36 4 years ago
yes, having passion over an issue is not a problem. Resorting to name calling and labeling people degrade our political culture and ability to rationalize. I see myself as conservative ( a CT conservative ;) ) but I am not a big fan of Anne Coulters tactics. As for human nature, I believe we are creatures of good and always strive to better ourselves. but we are easily distracted, especially from the sermon on the mount.
Daemonocracy 4 years ago
a CT conservative that's as rare as a george bush thought, huh?
BillReef 4 years ago
Dude, wake up.
George Bush is about as Texan as I am..
He is a CT Yankee blueblood frat boy, and his dude ranch is a Hollywood prop.
Bush is actually quite a socialist (he's pro-Wilsonian nation building, pro-progressive taxation, pro-centralized education, a borderless globalistically oriented US).
Republicans and Dems are both Marxists - and part of a Hegelian trick to control all resources and live off OUR sweat.
gablio77 4 years ago
Why do conservatives always use "liberal" like a curse word? If anything it's something to be proud of. And for republicans to use it as a curse word is just plain out retarded.
The US have two parties, one socially liberal/liberal and the other economically liberal/conservative. Both parties have major influences from that part of the ideology.
I mean just take the fact that republican party is part of the largest liberal organization in the world.
Visfen 4 years ago
Liberals suck.
But modern Republicans (called neo-cons as opposed to paleocons like me) are just like Ron Paul said to Hannity "ex-democrats who have taken over the GOP". They're liberals, too...just in a much more complex way.
gablio77 4 years ago
Kag:
You start with an ad hom. Good work. Adds so much to the conversation.
Then you question AC's qualifications, bcse you're too lazy to do own research. That really furthers your credibility.
AC, all those you list, and yourself too will follow JF. Don't know anyone who lives forever. Do you?
Then you end with an ad hom against a whole group.
You sure represent your side well. Quite commendable.
InvestigatorDave 4 years ago
L... OL. Are all Republicans as stupid as you?
kagenoyuushi 4 years ago
Kag:
Explain why you believe:
1. I'm a Republican
2. I'm stupid
Or is this another baseless ad hom attack without evidence that you've thrown out to deflect from defending your previous commentary?
InvestigatorDave 4 years ago
Ann Coulter's qualifications part 1
A Connecticut native, Coulter graduated with honors from Cornell University School of Arts & Sciences, and received her J.D. from University of Michigan Law School, where she was an editor of The Michigan Law Review.
Cerebus555 4 years ago
Ann Coulter's qualifications part2
Coulter clerked for the Honorable Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and was an attorney in the Department of Justice Honors Program for outstanding law school graduates.
Cerebus555 4 years ago
part 3
After practicing law in private practice in New York City, Coulter worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan. From there, she became a litigator with the Center For Individual Rights in Washington, DC, a public interest law firm dedicated to the defense of individual rights with particular emphasis on freedom of speech, civil rights, and the free exercise of religion.
Cerebus555 4 years ago
Hillary is a protege of the people that put Bush in office.
She's no different. The short-term agenda is different, but the long-term agenda is the same. Google : Hegelian dialectic.
gablio77 4 years ago
Is she kidding? Taryn made this to compliment Hillary and really wants her in the white house. This is flattery not mockery. Give me a break!
sandy949 4 years ago
One wonders if that's better, or worse -- and for either Hillary, Democrat politicians, or their target nation (America) in general.
TylerNull 4 years ago
I love Ann. GO THOMPSON 08
Justinm432 4 years ago
Gotta love Ann Coulter!
MoveAmericaForward 4 years ago
Ann Coulter kills me!
foxguy3001 4 years ago
Hillary kills my wallet
VinceP1974 4 years ago