Added: 4 years ago
From: RevolutionaryINK
Views: 395,201
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (17,412)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @AntiMAGGOTS5 Why don't ya share with these kind folks the fact that you're a registered SEX-OFFENDER,you MO-lester!

  • Most people are just very ignorant of history my friend! But DNA does not lie folks!

    1) The southeast Asian genome has been sequenced

    1) The East Asian genome has been sequenced

    and we know that these are people of African origin! But you know what else has been sequenced?

    A) The mongoloid genome has been sequened

    B) the Caucasoid genome has been sequenced

    GUESS WHAT THE CAUCASOID AND MONGOLOID ORIGIN IS? LOL

    they will tell you UNKNOWN!!!!!

    SHHHHHH!!! its monkeys and apes! hahahaha!

  • @VanSertimaVindicated We Chinese admit our African origin and now that the mongoloid genome has been sequenced we understand how the mongol invasions changed the entire face of East Asia for example CHINA,, Japan, Korea.

    We also understand how the mongols changed southeast Asia for example Burma, Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia and Singapore etc

    In a span of just 25 years, Genghis Khan himself conquered a larger area than the Romans did in four centuries

    The Khans sure were evil monkeys

  • @AntiMAGGOTS5 So this is another one of your spots eh stank ass?Trolling for fresh cocks to suck you rotten bitch?SPIT!

  • you all better get over yourselves, you are all direct descendants of the west africans who came to america via the slave trade, and i know many of you cant handle it cant handle pure FACT and prefer to FANTASIZE cos you are so ASHAMED of this fact. what a pity FOR YOU ALL WHO ARE ASHAMED OF WHO YOU ARE.. thats why you are known as the LOST people ... lost people will claim EVERYTHING AS LONG AS IT DOESNT REMIND THEM OF WHERE THEY GOT THEIR DNA FROM ..

  • yeah i have seen their craziness, the "moors, the isrealites, the indian wannabes, the mexican wannabes, the hispanic wannabes, the "European wannabes" amongst many of their wannabes.lol if it wasnt so pathetic it would be funny , pure comedy it is the black americans who have serious identity issues amongst all the diaspora they are the ones who are more likely to claim anything as long as that african gene it denied thats why i have no time for the majority of them . not worth the time.

  • these people will do anything to distance themselves to the origins of their dna and then claim to be chinese ? lol they dont look like chinese people to me, or maybe i MISSED SOMETHING HERE.. what a load of phoney BALONY but again its firmed rooted in the desperate attempts to find some sort of validation .. they have PROBLEMS..

  • that will give them some validation in the eyes of white men how sad for them, its beyond PITY this pathetic attempt to wring some sort of history for themselves outside SLAVERY IN THE USA .. wow!

  • of course according to this fella black americans are NOT directed descendants of the west african slave trade they actually come from china, india, pakistan, malaysia, germany ( via Beethoven) and of course the MING DYNASTY has a directed correlation to black america you can see the cultural resemblance and can see that MANDARIN AND CATONSE are basically EBONICS in disguise.. LOL .. what MANDINGO and CHINESE have to do with each other can only be imagined ! their DESPERATION TO FIND anything

  • goodness me these people have some serious ISSUES!!

  • THANKS MONKEY! HEHEHEHE!

    I OWN YOU! YOU FILTHY PIG! I OWN YOU

  • @msblackmagic14 that has nothing to do with black americans lol they are firmly rooted in the west african slave trade period fantasies and gibberish and a lot of weed smoking producing a bunch of HOCUS POCUS .. pathetic garbage to make themselves feel GOOD about their origins .. its beyond PITY .

  • Negroids have No Evolved, HUMAN DNA.. Like us Caucasoids (Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Babylonians, North Africans, Aryans) and Mongoloids (Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Mongolians, Olmecs, Aztecs, Mayans), all of these Races have Neanderthal DNA, and the Mind Gene, MICROCEPHALIN..

    NEGROIDS DON'T HAVE THESE GENES or DNA!!!!

  • I see LOL

  • the chinese had african slaves that's why they were in china but it has nothing to do with ancient mexico

  • GeneAlchemist9 = FOUL, ANTI-BLACK RACIST

  • @SuperQueenofAfrica didnt u know black americans are descendants of everyone and every place there was a great civilization, they built it then they turned into asians LOL, it seems they were everywhere except africa where they were found

  • @auspol04 looks like it they turned CHINESE like LIL KIM .. hahahaha

  • @SuperQueenofAfrica they also turned into europeans too which ironically they hate, they were the original celts, orig chinese and south americans, orig greeks, egyptians, buddha, jesus, beethoven even LOL we all know black people named ludwig van beethoven that were born in europe LOL, hebrew israelites also,aztecs and mayans, they are just a master race of african americans who build civilizations and quickly change skin color like chamelions

  • @auspol04 looks like black americans once ruled the earth single handed.. LOL ..

  • @SuperQueenofAfrica yes according to them they are superior in everything, smartest, physically superior, they are gods according to melanin theory if u havent seen any of it go to melanin theory videos, and white people like me are inferior cave monkey neandrathals who are devils and who steal and hide their history form them, we also go to egypt and reshape statues noses to make them look european and lighten the skin color of the hieroglyphs muahahhahaha us evil whites 

  • antiVERNUMFORRACIST = COWARDLY CLOSED by shitpacboom!

  • lol im gonna attack that right oWOOOOOOOOW WHAT A FREAK

  • @VanSertimaVindicated Did you know that the more that the monkey deletes your posts here thousands more people see it each time that you repost it on the worldwide web?

    You are steadily moving up in the search engines as a result of these stupid monkeys! Great job!

    Gee u really are leading this white trash around by the tail arent you? LOL

  • Check out the Olmec head in Africa! There is actually an Olmec head in Africa! take a look at the video in my page!

  • Nothing is more fulfilling than watching them come to grips to the reality of what they actually are! Hahaha!

    The light bulb actually goes off in some of their stringy haired heads and they begin to understand their relationship to Neanderthal. The smarter less delusional ones actually UNDERSTAND the Caucasoid and mongoloid gene! LOL

    I recentky had a student desperately inquire How is it that humans evolved in Africa if we are so closely related to the Orangutan?

    ANSWER=subspecies! bwahahaha

  • The Orangutan is a most revealing ape!

    No stone age skeletal remains of the Orangutan, Neanderthal, Denisova, Caucasoid or Mongoloid have EVER been found in ANY part of Africa because these species did not exist in Africa

    Neanderthal, Denisova the Caucasoid and mongoloid NEVER existed in ANY part of Africa or EAST ASIA and they ALL share O% Y-line ancestral DNA with ANY African or East Asian (Chinese, Japanese, Korean)

    It all sounds so UNBELIEVABLE but it is TRUE!

    What the hell is the cracker?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • I have been waiting for a cracker to attempt to explain the mongoloid genome to us. I am in need of a good laugh!

    The white man is doomed! They are just doomed little monkeys!

    We have sequenced the Australian genome, The southeast Asian genome, the east Asian genome the Paleo-Eskimo genome and the east, central and west African genome and they all have one thing in common! LOL

    Then of course we have the Caucasoid, mongoloid, Rhesus monkey, Neanderthal, Denisova and Orangutan genomes! LOL

  • Y chromosome DNA is the male genetic and mitochondrial DNA is the female genetic.

    it is a common ruse by white scientists to confuse history, by using Mtdna (mitochondrial) studies because Mtdna is the FEMALE genetic and CANNOT trace a people! It can ONLY say who a particular people MATED with!

    In order to trace a people, the male Y-dna (which does not change) MUST be used.

    DNA irrefutably PROVES that Whites are the offspring of monkeys apes and they are clearly ashamed of this reality

  • @VanSertimaVindicated We just have to pick a north east Asian, south east Asian, a Semang, an Indian, a European, a Papua New Guinean, a Melanesian, an Australian aboriginal, a Polynesian, a native American..etc person and put them all next to each other, and then also pick some people from any different parts of sub-Saharan Africa and do the same. We can then see which group has a greater diversity in their looks.

  • @VanSertimaVindicated Since Africa is the homeland of modern humans, we can easily see that the humans have occupied Africa longer than the rest of the world hence the bigger diversity in their (especially the Khoisans') mutations of mtDNA and y-chromosome.

    Regrading externally visible physical characteristics (which the topic is about), I think that ''sub -Saharan Africa is more diverse than the rest of the world'' is a myth.

  • @VanSertimaVindicated They are simply a very good tool to trace the movements of ancient populations because they mutate in a relatively fast pace, which also means that the longer the time of human occupancy of a region, the more diverse the mutations can be in that region.

  • @VanSertimaVindicated It is quite well known that according to population genetics based on mitochondrial DNA and y-chromosome, people in sub-Saharan Africa show greater diversity than the rest of the world. However mtDNA and y-chromosome prove absolutely nothing about external appearance or who their carriers really were because they make up a tiny part of the entire human genome.

  • @VanSertimaVindicated But these are only two characteristics. You can find sun-saharans with the same shape nose as you find in Europe, or Sub Saharans who have slanted eyes like Asians, you find Sub- Saharans with the same skull shapes you find in Europe, Asia, the Americas. Its not to say that the so-called Negro type doesn't exist, just that it is not representative of the entire Sub Saharan population.

  • @VanSertimaVindicated . Not all Sub Saharan populations have these so called Negroid features. They have many different facial structures. So how do we recognize them? Primarily because they tend to come in many shades of brown not found in European populations and their hair tends to be much curlier.

  • @VanSertimaVindicated trying to explain to you is that the classifications are problematic because they assume that the people called Negroes do not have any of the character traits that the people called Caucasians do. For instance, Negroes only have flat wide noses and thick lips, where as Caucasians have narrow noses and thin lips. The fact is that you find populations all across Africa who have thin lips and narrow noses as well

  • @VanSertimaVindicated monkeys and apes? i thought africans were the first people so wouldnt they be the first to evolve from monkeys and apes? there are no monkeys and apes in europe LOL

  • So how are these Goff balls saying a certain race are from neanderthals .

  • Neanderthal DNA

    Several ancient Neanderthal remains have been typed and found to differ significantly from human mitochondrial DNA. (Source) Amazingly, a team of scientists in Germany have recovered and sequenced Y-chromosome DNA from a 49,000 year-old Neandertha

  • this is 0 with regards to education

    your comments are extremely uninformed

    search for

    PREHISTORIC DACIA ENGLISH

    for the heavy-weight stuff

  • All mongoloids are Asians but not all Asians are mongoloids

    All Caucasoids (white people) are are Asians too, but they steadfastly try to hide this fact by insisting that they originated in Europe! Hahahaha!

  • @onlytoloveyou1 Let me help you out here you ignorant monkey OK? the ORIGINAL Eskimos WERE black ( Paleo-Eskimos)

    The ORIGINAL Italians were black (Anatolians )

    The indigenous peoples of the Americas, not to be confused with the NA mongoloid that came much later were black

    The Romans and Greeks were in large part a mixed race that mixed with the Anatolian

    You are right about Ghengis Khan however. He was NOT black but rather the red haired offspring of apes!

    Look at the mongoloid genome

  • oh yea the Eskimos from north America were black too, Romans were black also, Southerners During the civil war were black, than the Germans, they were black, Ghengis Khan and his Mongolians were black, Italians were black from the waist down, Indians were black, Martin Luther king Civil rights leader.- Fucken White Boy, Malcom X.....also White as Rice

  • Cain Hope Felder, a Professor of New Testament Language and Literature at Howard University and supporter of Afrocentric ideas, has warned Afrocentrists to avoid certain pitfalls, including:

  • Demonizing categorically all white people, without careful differentiation between persons of goodwill and those who consciously perpetuate racism.  Adopting multiculturalism as a curricular alternative that eliminates, marginalizes, or vilifies European heritage to the point that Europe epitomizes all the evil in the world. Gross over-generalizations and using factually or incorrect material is bad history and bad scholarship.

  • The word "Afrocentric" has been traced by Derrick Alridge to the American historian W.E.B. Du Bois, who employed it in the early 1960s. During the 1970s, Molefi Kete Asante appropriated the term, insisting that he was the only person equipped to define it, and asserting that even the holy archangels Du Bois and Cheikh Anta Diop had an imperfect and immature grasp of a concept that finds ultimate expression in his own pontifications.

  • Subsequently, it became a catchall "floating signifier," nebulous, unstable, and infinitely mutable.