It has an extremely fast 2 round burst feature but that's about it. After fielding this system its reliability has been questioned because of its higher complexity and failure rate. Just because its Russian made does not mean it has AK-47 reliability. Also AN-94 is not standard issue whereas the M16 is. The US military does have non standard issue rifles as well.
Why in every single Russian military video there has to be an American prick who bashes everyone who says Russian equipment are good, arguing that American weapons are better? Why cant Americans agree that BOTH Russian and American weapons are good. American weapons are designed for accuracy and comfort. Russian weapons are designed for reliability, firepower, and cheap manufacture (add accuracy if you count newer Russian weapons such as the AEK, AK-100s, and AN rifles). ITS A TRADE-OFF DAMN IT!
I'm not sure if this has been brought up already, but the main appeal of the AN-94 is the two-round burst feature. The inventor of the AN-94 found a way to eliminate recoil for the first two rounds via a pulley and cable system. Basically that feature allows one to place two rounds in the exact same spot in a burst without any noticeable recoil.
этот новый автомат менее надежен чем Калаш до 1985 года сборки и сложнее в уходе и несовершенная эргономика, ну конечно новизна есть в новой технологии - это факт.
i like the m16 better because of its superb accuracy, its outstanding power with such a small cartridge, its a classic, and it showed how accurate an assault rifle can be.
@MASEK1PROD They still use it because it's still a very accurate rifle for what it is, and it doesn't fail if properly maintained. The US military still widely uses the M4 which is in essence an M16 with a barrel shorter by 5.5 inches. Of course we're looking for a replacement, but only because it's a 50 year old rifle platform that could still greatly be improved upon.
@Doughman824 USA propaganda "AKA 'war movies/games' give people that idea. a soldier is only as good as his willingness to self sacrifice and training, which is why americans will never conquor asia or middle east directly. that's why they purposely throw countries they "liberate". kill the old dictator, create anarchy, new leader emerges, talk to new leader, remind him what happened to the old boss, then take all the country's shit, rinse and repeat
I wonder if the m16a4 can stand up to this rifle. Probably not unfortunately...its time for a new American assault rifle ;). And time for the Ruskies to upgrade their caliber so they can have a true badass weapon.
btw no point in m16 to AN94 comparison anyway, most ppl with an m16 put their own modifications on it anyway, like upper receiver replacements. check out the HK416 or better the M6A2, same base, far better.
@MrTurkeybird09 milled imi galil is based blu prints off RK62 witch is a Finnish high quality version of AK 47 so i think u would like an RK95TP (wikipedia for more info)
@Lolumadbruh i was trying to find video like AN-94 vs M4A1 but all these dumbass's around trying to compare Ak 47 with M4A1, this is more bullshit than this. Fucking 47 years difference!
Pros to ak type rifle reliable easy to maintain and operate field strips easy pros m16 type rifle acurate reliable despite what people think problem solved 50 years ago high rate of fire, lighter a soldier can carry more ammo
Ballistically they are equal if the ak is in 5.45 and the a2 version of the m16 is no longer used and the russian government certainly can't afford to arm its soldiers with new an 94s personally a milled imi galil would be my weapon of choice in combat
@MrTurkeybird09 The M16A2 is still widely used, main weapon of national guard, weapon used all around for the classes, used by many non-combattant units, and still used by some combat units. Of course most of combat units and active personnel is now issued with modular systems M4a1 and M16a4. I think M16a4 is a great rifle, M4 is not, and should be only issued to special personnel, a not as a main rifle. an AK-74M would be my choice
The firing test is so freaking funny : when he fires the M16 he is like "damn what the fuck is that shit made of plastic", he doesn't even look in the sights !!! And the funniest thing, is that he's not firing the AN-94 after that ! It's an AEK-971 that posses a balanced system to eliminate recoil. Basically the test is just a bad biased shit, but anyway, AEK-971 and AN-94 both are far superior to M16.
well thats a dumb thing to say m16 is battle proved. yes an is used by spesial forces and is proved to because they do shoot terrorists with it!! daaaa
@talonisles556 well exept that an-94 is not that old 1 and 2 it counts like a most modern rifle in the world§!!! u see when a tank shoot its cannon puls in and that is for less recoil and longer range and the an 94 use it just look carefully and last m16 is from 1950-60
@1nEGOR I never said the AN94 was bad, i like it and can't wait to see it after full production is made. But, that doesn't mean the M16 is bad either.
@southern661 and @monozonoking sorry to break you streak gunanatics but ak is more reliable in dirt and water condidtions and could land a man in snigle shot ..... while american m16 is average in any spec it has standard nato round burst option (ak47 not has one) and since it uses smaller round its more controllable i prefer ak47 for its caliber but m16 is good for weaker ppl and easier control
Switching from stick powder to ball and telling soldiers it didnt need to be cleaned was stupid. Thats why it jammed. The 556 has better range, muzzle velocity, and controlability in full auto. The straight line system with the buffer tube directly behind the bolt assembly and direct gas injection make the M16 the most effective and most influencial rifle ever devised. Except for maybe the German Mauser. Fuck your ignorance. Read a book or get some personel experiance troll.
@Lysanderfication The AK-74 has even better full auto characteristics and lower recoil then a M16 because of its very effective muzzle brake. 5.45x39 matches the 5.56x45 pretty much ballisticly. Actually, the FG42 was one of the first infantry rifles to have an inline stock system. The Americans, just like Russians, copied things from the Germans. The MAS-49 and and AG42 had DI and were around long before the M16 was.
@esh325 You can add a AK74 style muzzle brake to any AR15, my friend has one on his AR in 7.62x39, Bushmaster sells them. My PWS muzzle brake is way better than the AK74 brake, My M4 has one on there, zero muzzle lift or movement. The recoil of AR vs AK74 is very overrated. I can just use Tula ammo with the AK74 style brake on an AR15 and it will be same or less recoil than the AK74. Remember that the AR has an inline stock which moves the recoil straight back not up like with AKs.
@semiautoriflelover1 On the reverse, you can never fold the stock on an AR15. You can also buy straight lined stocks for the AK that fold and collapse, or you can buy stock with a buffer tube in it, but doesn't fold. The great thing about being civilians, is that we almost modify anything we don't like about our rifles, lol.
@esh325 shooting with the stock folded is almost useless on any weapon, it's just for transporting them or getting out of a police car to make it easier to get out. It's not much of an advantage, fire an AK47 which many people say it the worlds best rifle and with one of those metal stocks the muzzle will climb all over the place and the recoil will be crazy compared to the inline stock. I'm not sure about you but when I fire an AR15 the recoil is nothing at all, it stays on target outstanding
@semiautoriflelover1 Yeah, it's no good shooting with the stock folded. For you and I, we probably don't need folding stocks. For soldiers and paratroopers, a folding stock is an advantage. An AK with the stock folded is nearly 4 inches shorter then a M4 with a 14 inch barrel that has the stock retracted. The metal stock isn't that bad with the recoil. If you aren't wearing thicker clothing, it can be a bit of a bear though. Yeah the AR, has no recoil almost.
@esh325 An AK74 is 2.5lb or recoil energy with muzzle brake, an AR15 is 3.2lbs with a normal flash hider, if you add the AK74 brake or PWS brake the recoil would be same at least. When I used that tula ammo is was like .22 recoil, so low powered. The AK74 brake is very long, I'm glad mine doesn't have it, I like the shorter system, the VZ58 is really nice and compact when you have the folding stock, my barrel is 15.4" then extra for sight extension but it feels much shorter.
@semiautoriflelover1 yeah Ive seen this propaganda before..that Ruskey doesnt even have his nose on the charging handle to lock his head in..his head is bouncing all around..hahah he doesnt give a shit where its hitting. Its all for show. If the M-16 is so bad then why was the Iraqi Army and the Taliban tore out of the fucking FRAME on a regualr basis when they were armed with AKs? They got thier asses HANDED to them on a steaming fucking platter on a regular fuckin basis!
@Gloomshadow100 That guy looked like it was the first time he ever fired an M16. he was clueless. Like you say just for propaganda, russians love that shit.
@Gloomshadow100 The gun does not make the fighter. American soldiers have superior training. Towel heads have none. You ever seen the insurgent training films? they are a fucking joke. Plenty of american troops carry ak's. The gun is a but a tool, the soldier is the craftsman that puts that tool to use and makes it effective.
@Duckyistrippin If you think the U.S issues our soldiers with shitty Russian weapons you need to lay off those war video games you have been playing !
I worked on a U.S Military base 5 years, its is a serious Military offense to use any weapon other then your U.S issued weapon on active duty.
And go against Military order then someone gets killed because you want to be a Russian Rambo with a shitty AK 47 ! You better like the federal jail real well !
@Moldovawineimporter DICK ASS THE AK 47 WILL RAPE YOUR MAMAS ASS AGAIN(REMEMBER VIETNAM)IF DONT ASK YOUR PUSSY AMERICAN ASS GRANPA AK RULES!!!!! M16....WHATEVER IS TOTAL FAIL!FUCKEN U.S FAGGOT
@luka2298 Vietnam? You mean that war where MILLIONS of NVA/VC died and around 40, 000 Americans died? The war that America left SOLELY because of liberal politics? The war where America won every strategically important battle? Fucking uninformed america hater. AK=Designed to be mediocre, but completely fool-proof, M16=Designed to perform AMAZINGLY when properly maintained by a well-trained, 1st world army soldier.
@FrankDaTank1218 yea idiot now go learn HISTORY if that exists in your moron country,they wont tell you the truth anyways,they LOST the war!!!THEY MADE ONE VIETNAMESE 5 STAR GENERAL THATS ALL THEY COULD DO!!!LOL your helicopters dropping like flies,your soldiers crying for mercy,Russians NEVER did that in their wars!!Because they ARE HEROES!!!and you are SHITHOLES GAY!!!
@luka2298 60,000 americans dead, between 2.5-3 MILLION NVA and Vietcong died, the North Vietnamese biggest offensive, the "Tet Offensive", was a complete failure, along with many battle like Huey being losses for the NVA. We left because the war was unpopular. Americans died=/= we lost jerkoff. And Russia never did that? How about when you got completely kicked out of Afghanistan? And yes we helped them with weapons, but RUSSIA helped the NVA too!
@FrankDaTank1218 The Chinese also helped. I gotta agree with you though, because most people think we got destroyed over there...If we stayed there a few more years though, we'd flatten south vietnam and would most likely have a larger scale conflict on our hands. We left because we wanted to avoid that and wanted the south to fix their own communist problems. The russians were forced to use bent rifles because the afghans took their better equipment :P
@MegaBuster777 Don't know what you mean by "flatten South Vietnam. Also, your excuse for Russia losing Afghanistan was because they were incompetent enough to get their weapons stolen?
@FrankDaTank1218 Because we ended up demolishing south vietnam even though we tried to pacify it. Not only that, but we were forced into countless armed conflicts in South Vietnam. Also, the fact Russians lost their weapons was not why they lost. I'm sure the training of the rebels from american forces had a much larger impact.
@luka2298 In WWII Russia lost more then any other country. Sure they are hero's and they put in more effort then anyone else on the war on the Axis, but the whole officers shooting every tenth man isn't really a war winning strategy...plus. Look back to a conflict in Afghanistan where where you faced a much smaller threat and still lost thousands in a pointless conflict. History does exist in both countries. We're equals and you fail to realize that
@semiautoriflelover1 An AKM on full auto is good for about 7 yards or inside a room. More than 2 shot full auto at 15 yards and the 3rd round will be right over the target. With the AK 74 and M16 both cartridges have almost identical recoil impulse. The 74 brake is more effective than a flash suppressor but the AR wins on DI gas system and direct line recoil. These AK fanboys are just insane. You can not rationalize with them.
@Southern661 äääähhh sorry but the ak was in the vietnam war really good and the m16 was bad and jammed.............but i prefer the m16 because i like it
Well Russians don't know how to shoot M16's. They're too damn precise, see how they just sprayed all over the place? That wouldn't happen with a trained American soldier.
@RABBITANGRY dumass this is a old test video made in the 90s and their talking about the m16a2 the standard small arm of the US military at that time not the m16a1 the first gun in the m16 series used in the sixties
@antonidar67 The standard small arm of the Russia's military at that time was AKS74, and it still is. So it is make sense to compare them. Because advantage of AN94, which is NOT a standard small arm, over the standard M16A2 doesn't illustrate it's coolness.
It's the same thing if they would compare it AN94 with a musket rifle... dumass.
@lookatthewholepictur How exactly did you figure that out? the video only showed them in fully automatic fire, which would make it a comparison of controllability .
@inkbot2000 The way the M16 was designed to push the recoil directly back to your shoulder, producing less muzzle rise, the AK series rifles are made with the Idea of trench warfare in mind and were designed for such, and thats why the AK rifles have more kick, which makes the M16 more precise since you will be able to keep the weapon more on target, And it's accuracy is better because it shoots a 5.56 x 45 round instead of a 7.62 x 39 or 5.45 x 39, so the bullet to it is longer,thereofoe acurte
@lookatthewholepictur WTF are you going on about? Firstly the AN94 is not part of the AK series. The Nikonov series of rifles are designed to replace the Kalishnikov rifles. Second, Nikonov rifles are much more accurate, way easier to control, and reduce recoil by tons (first 2 shots leave the barrel before ANY recoil is felt).
@DRGgang2 It is a vastly more complex design nothing like Kalishnikov rifles at all. Not only is it difficult to field strip, but it also suffers from reliability issues like the AR-15 rifles and their derivatives and thus requires careful maintenance. Plus it fires a tiny round even smaller than the M16. IMO it was a waste of resources on Russia's part but that's just my opinion.
@mauiboynokaoi да он хорош в тире, да и то есть вопросы когда клину дает, но в боевых условиях он АН проигрывает, кому нужен автомат если из него нельзя стрелять, очень не надежная машина... да вопрос ко всем кто нибудь из вас его хотя бы в руках держал, сомневаюсь, а на заборе можно написать что и рогатка стреляет баллистическими ракетами, да бой точный, но не надежный, проверено даже рядовыми спецназа ГРУ...
@Noxnaxia What you mean the AK-100 series? The latest Kalishnikov (107/108 models) both feature a gas operation completely different from traditional Kalishnikov rifles (designed by Alexandrov). The AK-74 and its carbine variant the AK-105 remain the main service rifles for the Russian army. The AN-94 was designed to make obsolete AK rifles and their variants. It failed at that. Too expensive, complex, and unreliable.
@Noxnaxia I didn't say the rifle was designed by Alexandrov I said the gas operated mechanism was. And the idea was to replace all AK models due to the shortcomings in terms of recoil and accuracy but again, that will never happen. AN-94s are too expensive, too complex, and too unreliable. Just because a gun was supposed to do something doesn't mean that's what it really does.
@lookatthewholepictur I don't remember reading anywhere that the AK-47 was designed specifically to fight in trenches, but I'm sure it could if it had do. The AK-47 has more kick because it fires a heavier grain bullet that generates more recoil.
@lookatthewholepictur the whole time i read this i couldn't get out of my head "the AK series rifles are made with the Idea of trench warfare in mind"
@vinillanut not even. M14 was a complete flop. At medium to Long range you either hit your target with one shot or they would get to cover by the time you could line it up for another.
@ISR1917 The AK are great solely for the reason that you can fire it after 1000years of torture. They are reliable as fuck. But the M16 is so much smoother in its operation than the AN/AK. The 5.56 is a great round. The only thing I do not appreciate about the 5.56 is that is cannot penetrate cinderblock walls and tag the person behind it like the 7.62x39 can. In urban warfare I do agree that the AK is better than the M16 because it can take out the cover you are hiding behind.
@Army19D619 Now i agree with you all the way but you can't entirely say that about the AN-94 because its almost impossible to have it in the US and therefore cant say if its 2 shot burst option is or isin't as smooth as the M16 whether in burst or single fire but your other points are right about the AK and M16 respectively, they both have their pros and cons and are great depending in what situation they are put in, but in my point of view I would pick the An if i could ever get my hands on it.
@ISR1917 Well yeah they did in Vietnam because the Army went in thinking that the M16 never needed to be clean which we all know is a total lie that bitch get dirty haha fucking star chamber... If you keep it clean it will take care of you. It is a reliable weapon if properly cared for.
@ISR1917 I wouldn't give up my M4. I would like the M16 due to the 20" barrel for maximum velocity. But the ability to care vast amounts of ammo attracts me to the M4 over the AK if it were laying right in front of me. The wounding properties of the 5.56 is better than the 7.62x39. Better accuracy, flater trajectory, further range. It is an all out better round. Yeah the M16/4 does jam every once in awhile if you don't take care of it. It's not a caveman's rifle like the AK.
I lold at the supposed "spread" of the M16. Since when does it have vertical climb that high? Especially when it seems like hes firing semi auto. Unless hes firing full auto, I find the results pretty sketchy.
@AwookieGaming It is bullshit propaganda. Russia has to produce bullshit results for our superior equipment to make their useless nation feel better about how poor and less technical they are than us. Russian made things are shit. We have both quantity and quality whereas Russia just has quantity. That is their philosophy in war. Overwhelm the enemy with huge numbers with shit equipment that against a superior nation like the US with advanced technology, does not work. We could just use a UAV :D
Some times i come back here repeatly, and see the same shitty amount of crappy COD whores or pseudo "marine" bashing theyr shit based on the magic stick stuffed in their ass. Jesus... AN94 is MAKE to be accurate in auto, unlike M16, it's logical it has a better grouping. For semi auto, both are as good.
@Sappette Yeah that must be it. My M-16 never jammed as long as you take care of it, it will take care of you. You Russian's just like dirty shit so you make shit that never has to be cleaned. Everything Russia makes it garbage. Everything the US military purchases is high quality shit. Hooah. Fuck Russia. The M-16 is way more accurate and has a max range of 550m as oppose to the AK which is about 200-300m which means accuracy and range are proven better in the M-16. Fuck Russia propaganda.
capitalism, communism same damn thing both can work but its the people that dont work. America is a great place to live it has it problems but what country dosent
keep in mind both guns are crap. why? because both guns use crappy ammo. the an94 uses a 5.45x.39 round which has poor range and little punching power get throughheavy vests. the 5.56x.45 is no different. it has poor range alittle more (but not by much) punching power than the 5.45. both rounds were designed for the spray and prey doctine created by european military doctrine of puting alot of fire on your enemy and one will hit him. both guns dont deserve these rounds and could be alot better
Isn't the whole point of the AN94's mechanism to negate the weakness of its cartridge's armour penetration with the 2-round burst? In any case the higher accuracy would probably take a bit of the 'pray' out of 'spray-n-pray'.
@DoesThisNameWorkYet yes thats true but the point i was trying to make is that those types of rounds are designed to be fired in full auto. it was made to be light so that more magazines can be carried (range degraded). just think if the an94 used a 6.5 grendal round or the 6.8 (both rounds out preform the 7.62 in almost every way) it would make the an94 the superior weapon to have right now. the m16 would be 10 times as good since its more of a marksmans rifle anyway. see what im saying
@frightner24 Agreed. The 6.5mm and 6.8mm round outperform both the 7.62mm and the 5.56mm in my opinion. 5.56mm is nearly useless because it can't put people down, and the 7.62mm round is just as useless because it's maximum effective range is shit. 6.5mm or 6.8mm is the optimal size for all GENERAL engagement.
"Right now I had shot from the vaunted american M16 A2, and our home assault rifle ASM, just adopted by the Russian army under the name Nikonov assault rifle. Firings results speak for themselves - Nikonov assault rifle exceed the M16 on the accuracy of fire, not less than ten times".
@MrSlowkid well when i was in service in Afghanistan The m16a4 (I only used single fire because thats the best of three firing options) I found my m16 to Jam more then i would like it to. I never fired a AN95 abakan but I think it would be more reliable and Less likely to Fail on me. I went through 3 M16's over my 5 years But over all The m16 is a Good weapon.
the thing is, the m16 will fail on you all the time, you can't trust the m16 rifle, cus it jams to much. so AN-94 is much much better... cus it never fails on you, but if you guys want the best rifle in the world, then it's OC-14-4A (Groza) it's a Bullpup version of the AK-47, and you all know that the ak-47 never jams with proper amunation, never ever....
but of course, there are plenty other rifle out there that works, but m16/m4 based rifles isn't one of them.....
@olavtorjus95 - Lol - How can you have a bullpop version of ANY gun? Do you even know what a bullpup is? - you would have to completely redesign the gun
The designers of the OC-14-4A actually used the AK-74U as influence, meaning they wanted a small weapon which handled very well in CQB - hence why they made a bullpup
Guns like the Tar-21, Famas and L85a2 make WAY better bullpup rifles than the OC-14-4A
If reliability is the most important factor for you, then why say a bullpup is best?
@TomHartill lol, there are even bullpup versions of the m4 carbine, and many many more, the reson the Groza is the best is bacause it has a ak receiver, one of the best receivers that excists. but like l85 its not posible for a lefty to use, (i'm a lefty) that's why i like the steyr aug the best, you can change the shell port ejection:)
@olavtorjus95 - well all the AK series of guns will have very similar parts, but your talking about a bullpup which is a very much a different design, there are only so many parts a bullpup could share. Too be honest I wouldn't even class the OC-14-4A as an assault rifle but more of a SMG or carbine?
I guess if your a lefty then you wouldn't want red hot shell casings in your face with the L85 !! I seem to rember there being a reason for the L85 not being ambidextrous, cant rember it though.
@Robbieifyoucan Well I might be a dumbfuck but studies show that the 5.45x39 round has a much higher wounding potential over the 556 even if the 556 has a little more energy.
@Travmapunk wow... a typo... nobody every does that... Russians never do, Chinese never do, Spanish, English, German never do... I can't believe that America would be so stupid to make a small mistake that nobody even cares about and mister Gennadiy Nikonov probably immediately forgave them for... Big bad America never does anything right.
@Travmapunk - I am seriously thinking that Russians have a lower average IQ than the rest of the world!
This is judging from the number of the idiotic comments I see on youtube made by Russians. You guys also have a MASSIVE inferiority complex, I think its from all the propagander and BS your government feeds you.
@TomHartill HAS ANY AMERICAN EVER STOPPED AND LOOKED AT IT FROM THE OPPOSITE VIEW, EVERYTHING YOU SAY IS EITHER HYPOCRITICAL OR WITHOUT THE ABILITY TO REALISE, HEY, MABY THIS GUY JUST HAS ANOTHER OPINION, FOR EXAMPLE THE IDEA OF KOMMUNISM WAS TO ELIMINATE THE CLASS SYSTEM, TO GET EVERYONE EQUAL OPERTUNITY, NOT DUE TO BEING EVIL, FOR FUCK SAKES, AND I'M WRITING IN CAPITALS 'CAUSE ITS FUN. I'M LEAVING NOW SO DON'T BOTHER REPLYING, AND I'M AM NOT RUSSIAN, I GET INFO FROM USA, I READ BETWEEN LINES.
@TomHartill Communism is great in theory. Throughout history though, the theory of communism being a successful type of government has been proven wrong. I think current day Russia might be the first example of a communist society that is actually working fairly well. American's just dont like communism because it goes against our democratic-republic government, which is what we've been fighting for throughout our American history. The idea of communism opposes it
This has been flagged as spam show
I would not turn down an AN-94 if presented but all in all I prefer the Aks-74m over an m16 for many reasons.
sheenydonut 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
sheenydonut 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
sheenydonut 3 weeks ago
the AN94 is so good that almost every country wants to buy......oh wait, no they dont
Stridus7 3 weeks ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
AN 94 Disassembly and Reassembly HD video here
youtube.com/watch?v=43Q_LfbFc8M&feature=plcp&context=C3693533UDOEgsToPDskJGUEU_WPO3GgYK2IzQ_Vv1
If this is not working, just search for 'AN 94 Disassembly and Reassembly HD'
imalchanaka 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
imalchanaka 4 weeks ago
its so stupid to compare m16 with a an 94.What did you thing m16 would win. hell no
turkeyforever100 1 month ago
It has an extremely fast 2 round burst feature but that's about it. After fielding this system its reliability has been questioned because of its higher complexity and failure rate. Just because its Russian made does not mean it has AK-47 reliability. Also AN-94 is not standard issue whereas the M16 is. The US military does have non standard issue rifles as well.
bronzah 2 months ago
Why in every single Russian military video there has to be an American prick who bashes everyone who says Russian equipment are good, arguing that American weapons are better? Why cant Americans agree that BOTH Russian and American weapons are good. American weapons are designed for accuracy and comfort. Russian weapons are designed for reliability, firepower, and cheap manufacture (add accuracy if you count newer Russian weapons such as the AEK, AK-100s, and AN rifles). ITS A TRADE-OFF DAMN IT!
LemonatedOrange 2 months ago
I'm not sure if this has been brought up already, but the main appeal of the AN-94 is the two-round burst feature. The inventor of the AN-94 found a way to eliminate recoil for the first two rounds via a pulley and cable system. Basically that feature allows one to place two rounds in the exact same spot in a burst without any noticeable recoil.
Bystandah 2 months ago
этот новый автомат менее надежен чем Калаш до 1985 года сборки и сложнее в уходе и несовершенная эргономика, ну конечно новизна есть в новой технологии - это факт.
sharps33 2 months ago
M16A2 entered service in 1986
AN-94 entered service in 1997
The AN-94 was adopted 11 years later, so it had better be better or something is way wrong
the real question? AN-94 vs FN SCAR ( USSOCOM's new rifle)
scrobisch 2 months ago
i like the m16 better because of its superb accuracy, its outstanding power with such a small cartridge, its a classic, and it showed how accurate an assault rifle can be.
jrodallegas678 2 months ago
the an 94 IS WAY BETTER THAN THE M16 THUMBS UP IF YOU AGREE!!!
superultrarussianfan 2 months ago 4
Its funny how some people just like m16 better cause they live in US and thinks Russia sucks...
Doughman824 3 months ago 39
@Doughman824 I like both guns
NoTagNamesLeft 2 months ago
@Doughman824 Russia does suck but the m16 sucks more..only the USMC still uses it
MASEK1PROD 2 months ago
@MASEK1PROD They still use it because it's still a very accurate rifle for what it is, and it doesn't fail if properly maintained. The US military still widely uses the M4 which is in essence an M16 with a barrel shorter by 5.5 inches. Of course we're looking for a replacement, but only because it's a 50 year old rifle platform that could still greatly be improved upon.
MegaBuster777 1 month ago
@Doughman824 USA propaganda "AKA 'war movies/games' give people that idea. a soldier is only as good as his willingness to self sacrifice and training, which is why americans will never conquor asia or middle east directly. that's why they purposely throw countries they "liberate". kill the old dictator, create anarchy, new leader emerges, talk to new leader, remind him what happened to the old boss, then take all the country's shit, rinse and repeat
600trillion 1 month ago
at 0:39 you see in the guy's face, Hmm cheap capitalist plastik!
kaiser5676 3 months ago
0:44 um.........isn't that an AEK???
MEATHOOK80 3 months ago
@MEATHOOK80 No, it's not.
clawbog2 3 months ago
@clawbog2 AK107? The front ends look very similar, forgive me!
MEATHOOK80 3 months ago
I wonder if the m16a4 can stand up to this rifle. Probably not unfortunately...its time for a new American assault rifle ;). And time for the Ruskies to upgrade their caliber so they can have a true badass weapon.
1337wafflezz 4 months ago
Propaganda...
Tobriep81 4 months ago
The test firer said "After comparing M16A2 and AN 94 on the range, shot groups for AN 94 was at least ten times better than of M16A2."
Caliell 4 months ago
What he is saying is that he wishes that his AK had the accuracy and ergonomics of an M16
1lostinspace 4 months ago
@1lostinspace AEK-971 for the win
SecretSpetsnaz 4 months ago
The soldier says that the Nikonov is better! I dont even know how to speak Russian, but I can tell! thumbs up if you agree! :D
proxynation 5 months ago 36
@proxynation of coarse.....
btw no point in m16 to AN94 comparison anyway, most ppl with an m16 put their own modifications on it anyway, like upper receiver replacements. check out the HK416 or better the M6A2, same base, far better.
600trillion 1 month ago
@MrTurkeybird09 milled imi galil is based blu prints off RK62 witch is a Finnish high quality version of AK 47 so i think u would like an RK95TP (wikipedia for more info)
dcrypter87 5 months ago
Wait, the AN-94 is being compared to the M16A2? Well, that just doesn't seem fair at all...
Lolumadbruh 5 months ago
@Lolumadbruh i was trying to find video like AN-94 vs M4A1 but all these dumbass's around trying to compare Ak 47 with M4A1, this is more bullshit than this. Fucking 47 years difference!
StalkerDarius 5 months ago
@Lolumadbruh it is plain fair, in years of comparison, M16a2 was the main rifle used by USA, and remained until 2003-2004.
PATRONSKiii 5 months ago
Pros to ak type rifle reliable easy to maintain and operate field strips easy pros m16 type rifle acurate reliable despite what people think problem solved 50 years ago high rate of fire, lighter a soldier can carry more ammo
Ballistically they are equal if the ak is in 5.45 and the a2 version of the m16 is no longer used and the russian government certainly can't afford to arm its soldiers with new an 94s personally a milled imi galil would be my weapon of choice in combat
MrTurkeybird09 5 months ago
@MrTurkeybird09 The M16A2 is still widely used, main weapon of national guard, weapon used all around for the classes, used by many non-combattant units, and still used by some combat units. Of course most of combat units and active personnel is now issued with modular systems M4a1 and M16a4. I think M16a4 is a great rifle, M4 is not, and should be only issued to special personnel, a not as a main rifle. an AK-74M would be my choice
PATRONSKiii 5 months ago
The firing test is so freaking funny : when he fires the M16 he is like "damn what the fuck is that shit made of plastic", he doesn't even look in the sights !!! And the funniest thing, is that he's not firing the AN-94 after that ! It's an AEK-971 that posses a balanced system to eliminate recoil. Basically the test is just a bad biased shit, but anyway, AEK-971 and AN-94 both are far superior to M16.
PATRONSKiii 5 months ago
:10 "Plastic piece of shit" is what he's thinking
Duckyistrippin 6 months ago
well thats a dumb thing to say m16 is battle proved. yes an is used by spesial forces and is proved to because they do shoot terrorists with it!! daaaa
1nEGOR 6 months ago
@1nEGOR you know how many american operators carry ak's?
Duckyistrippin 6 months ago
@Duckyistrippin Truthfully not many, and the ones who carried shitty AKs are dead !
Moldovawineimporter 3 months ago
@Moldovawineimporter YOUR MAMAS ASS IS DOWN RUSSIAN SOLDIER IS RAPING HER HAHAHHAHA
luka2298 3 months ago
@1nEGOR id say it is battle proved if it does its kob well foe over 40 years now
talonisles556 6 months ago
@talonisles556 well exept that an-94 is not that old 1 and 2 it counts like a most modern rifle in the world§!!! u see when a tank shoot its cannon puls in and that is for less recoil and longer range and the an 94 use it just look carefully and last m16 is from 1950-60
1nEGOR 6 months ago
@1nEGOR I never said the AN94 was bad, i like it and can't wait to see it after full production is made. But, that doesn't mean the M16 is bad either.
talonisles556 4 months ago
That soldier was firing the M16A2 like a pussy, he wasn't even leaning into it, that is why his group was poor.
semiautoriflelover1 6 months ago
well it is dumb ass thing to do it cause m16 is weak RIfle and ak and an is worlds best ASSault rifles in tha world
1nEGOR 6 months ago
@1nEGOR The M16 is battle tested while the AN has seen nothing and proven nothing, through some mud on it and it will jam.
semiautoriflelover1 6 months ago
@semiautoriflelover1 yeahyeah who cares
SecretSpetsnaz 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the AN 94 operating mechanism
youtube.com/watch?v=3JxedhGg7z0
youtube.com/watch?v=Tfw4KIge_y0
If this link is not working, search for "AN 94 operating mechanism of two round burst" and click on the first and second results.
imalchanaka 6 months ago
Comment removed
imalchanaka 6 months ago
@southern661 and @monozonoking sorry to break you streak gunanatics but ak is more reliable in dirt and water condidtions and could land a man in snigle shot ..... while american m16 is average in any spec it has standard nato round burst option (ak47 not has one) and since it uses smaller round its more controllable i prefer ak47 for its caliber but m16 is good for weaker ppl and easier control
Domew4 6 months ago
@Domew4 I'm quite sure he was being sarcastic...
MrThomPS3 6 months ago
Switching from stick powder to ball and telling soldiers it didnt need to be cleaned was stupid. Thats why it jammed. The 556 has better range, muzzle velocity, and controlability in full auto. The straight line system with the buffer tube directly behind the bolt assembly and direct gas injection make the M16 the most effective and most influencial rifle ever devised. Except for maybe the German Mauser. Fuck your ignorance. Read a book or get some personel experiance troll.
Lysanderfication 6 months ago
@Lysanderfication The AK-74 has even better full auto characteristics and lower recoil then a M16 because of its very effective muzzle brake. 5.45x39 matches the 5.56x45 pretty much ballisticly. Actually, the FG42 was one of the first infantry rifles to have an inline stock system. The Americans, just like Russians, copied things from the Germans. The MAS-49 and and AG42 had DI and were around long before the M16 was.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 You can add a AK74 style muzzle brake to any AR15, my friend has one on his AR in 7.62x39, Bushmaster sells them. My PWS muzzle brake is way better than the AK74 brake, My M4 has one on there, zero muzzle lift or movement. The recoil of AR vs AK74 is very overrated. I can just use Tula ammo with the AK74 style brake on an AR15 and it will be same or less recoil than the AK74. Remember that the AR has an inline stock which moves the recoil straight back not up like with AKs.
semiautoriflelover1 6 months ago
@semiautoriflelover1 On the reverse, you can never fold the stock on an AR15. You can also buy straight lined stocks for the AK that fold and collapse, or you can buy stock with a buffer tube in it, but doesn't fold. The great thing about being civilians, is that we almost modify anything we don't like about our rifles, lol.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 shooting with the stock folded is almost useless on any weapon, it's just for transporting them or getting out of a police car to make it easier to get out. It's not much of an advantage, fire an AK47 which many people say it the worlds best rifle and with one of those metal stocks the muzzle will climb all over the place and the recoil will be crazy compared to the inline stock. I'm not sure about you but when I fire an AR15 the recoil is nothing at all, it stays on target outstanding
semiautoriflelover1 6 months ago
@semiautoriflelover1 Yeah, it's no good shooting with the stock folded. For you and I, we probably don't need folding stocks. For soldiers and paratroopers, a folding stock is an advantage. An AK with the stock folded is nearly 4 inches shorter then a M4 with a 14 inch barrel that has the stock retracted. The metal stock isn't that bad with the recoil. If you aren't wearing thicker clothing, it can be a bit of a bear though. Yeah the AR, has no recoil almost.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 An AK74 is 2.5lb or recoil energy with muzzle brake, an AR15 is 3.2lbs with a normal flash hider, if you add the AK74 brake or PWS brake the recoil would be same at least. When I used that tula ammo is was like .22 recoil, so low powered. The AK74 brake is very long, I'm glad mine doesn't have it, I like the shorter system, the VZ58 is really nice and compact when you have the folding stock, my barrel is 15.4" then extra for sight extension but it feels much shorter.
semiautoriflelover1 6 months ago
@semiautoriflelover1 yeah Ive seen this propaganda before..that Ruskey doesnt even have his nose on the charging handle to lock his head in..his head is bouncing all around..hahah he doesnt give a shit where its hitting. Its all for show. If the M-16 is so bad then why was the Iraqi Army and the Taliban tore out of the fucking FRAME on a regualr basis when they were armed with AKs? They got thier asses HANDED to them on a steaming fucking platter on a regular fuckin basis!
Gloomshadow100 6 months ago
@Gloomshadow100 That guy looked like it was the first time he ever fired an M16. he was clueless. Like you say just for propaganda, russians love that shit.
jetfuel545 6 months ago
@Gloomshadow100 The gun does not make the fighter. American soldiers have superior training. Towel heads have none. You ever seen the insurgent training films? they are a fucking joke. Plenty of american troops carry ak's. The gun is a but a tool, the soldier is the craftsman that puts that tool to use and makes it effective.
Duckyistrippin 6 months ago
@Duckyistrippin we werent allowed to carry those, the sound would confuse the other units and they would call an airstrike in on you.
Gloomshadow100 6 months ago
@Duckyistrippin If you think the U.S issues our soldiers with shitty Russian weapons you need to lay off those war video games you have been playing !
I worked on a U.S Military base 5 years, its is a serious Military offense to use any weapon other then your U.S issued weapon on active duty.
And go against Military order then someone gets killed because you want to be a Russian Rambo with a shitty AK 47 ! You better like the federal jail real well !
Moldovawineimporter 3 months ago
@Moldovawineimporter Yes yes, feed on the propaganda.
clawbog2 3 months ago
@clawbog2
The propaganda? Of what? It's a virtue of the fact that it is illegal to use a weapon other than those issued to you in the militrary
AGeekWithAShotgun 3 months ago
@Moldovawineimporter DICK ASS THE AK 47 WILL RAPE YOUR MAMAS ASS AGAIN(REMEMBER VIETNAM)IF DONT ASK YOUR PUSSY AMERICAN ASS GRANPA AK RULES!!!!! M16....WHATEVER IS TOTAL FAIL!FUCKEN U.S FAGGOT
luka2298 3 months ago
@luka2298 Vietnam? You mean that war where MILLIONS of NVA/VC died and around 40, 000 Americans died? The war that America left SOLELY because of liberal politics? The war where America won every strategically important battle? Fucking uninformed america hater. AK=Designed to be mediocre, but completely fool-proof, M16=Designed to perform AMAZINGLY when properly maintained by a well-trained, 1st world army soldier.
FrankDaTank1218 2 months ago
@FrankDaTank1218 yea idiot now go learn HISTORY if that exists in your moron country,they wont tell you the truth anyways,they LOST the war!!!THEY MADE ONE VIETNAMESE 5 STAR GENERAL THATS ALL THEY COULD DO!!!LOL your helicopters dropping like flies,your soldiers crying for mercy,Russians NEVER did that in their wars!!Because they ARE HEROES!!!and you are SHITHOLES GAY!!!
luka2298 2 months ago
@luka2298 thay EVEN SHOT YOU FROM RIKSHAS!!!
luka2298 2 months ago
@luka2298 60,000 americans dead, between 2.5-3 MILLION NVA and Vietcong died, the North Vietnamese biggest offensive, the "Tet Offensive", was a complete failure, along with many battle like Huey being losses for the NVA. We left because the war was unpopular. Americans died=/= we lost jerkoff. And Russia never did that? How about when you got completely kicked out of Afghanistan? And yes we helped them with weapons, but RUSSIA helped the NVA too!
FrankDaTank1218 2 months ago
@FrankDaTank1218 The Chinese also helped. I gotta agree with you though, because most people think we got destroyed over there...If we stayed there a few more years though, we'd flatten south vietnam and would most likely have a larger scale conflict on our hands. We left because we wanted to avoid that and wanted the south to fix their own communist problems. The russians were forced to use bent rifles because the afghans took their better equipment :P
MegaBuster777 1 month ago
@MegaBuster777 Don't know what you mean by "flatten South Vietnam. Also, your excuse for Russia losing Afghanistan was because they were incompetent enough to get their weapons stolen?
FrankDaTank1218 1 month ago
@FrankDaTank1218 Because we ended up demolishing south vietnam even though we tried to pacify it. Not only that, but we were forced into countless armed conflicts in South Vietnam. Also, the fact Russians lost their weapons was not why they lost. I'm sure the training of the rebels from american forces had a much larger impact.
MegaBuster777 1 month ago
@luka2298 In WWII Russia lost more then any other country. Sure they are hero's and they put in more effort then anyone else on the war on the Axis, but the whole officers shooting every tenth man isn't really a war winning strategy...plus. Look back to a conflict in Afghanistan where where you faced a much smaller threat and still lost thousands in a pointless conflict. History does exist in both countries. We're equals and you fail to realize that
MegaBuster777 1 month ago
@semiautoriflelover1 An AKM on full auto is good for about 7 yards or inside a room. More than 2 shot full auto at 15 yards and the 3rd round will be right over the target. With the AK 74 and M16 both cartridges have almost identical recoil impulse. The 74 brake is more effective than a flash suppressor but the AR wins on DI gas system and direct line recoil. These AK fanboys are just insane. You can not rationalize with them.
jetfuel545 6 months ago
M16 FTW. why? Simple, its tried, tested and true. Sorry AK fan boys.
Lysanderfication 6 months ago
@Lysanderfication M16 FTW!! We all know how bad the AK jammed in the vietnam war.
Southern661 6 months ago
@Southern661 äääähhh sorry but the ak was in the vietnam war really good and the m16 was bad and jammed.............but i prefer the m16 because i like it
monozonoking 6 months ago
damn niga the m16 isnt that bad. Its more accurate than what portrayed in the video. verry high muzzle velocity. and verry accurate.
WiLLYJ96 6 months ago
Well Russians don't know how to shoot M16's. They're too damn precise, see how they just sprayed all over the place? That wouldn't happen with a trained American soldier.
thetiniestbullfrog 7 months ago
@thetiniestbullfrog You're a fucking joke son. Before I clicked over to this video I've been waiting for some dumbass with that.
DigitalDNA 7 months ago
does it make any sense to compare a rifle adopted in sixties with a rifle adopted in 1994 ?
stupid video.
RABBITANGRY 7 months ago
@RABBITANGRY dumass this is a old test video made in the 90s and their talking about the m16a2 the standard small arm of the US military at that time not the m16a1 the first gun in the m16 series used in the sixties
antonidar67 7 months ago
@antonidar67 The standard small arm of the Russia's military at that time was AKS74, and it still is. So it is make sense to compare them. Because advantage of AN94, which is NOT a standard small arm, over the standard M16A2 doesn't illustrate it's coolness.
It's the same thing if they would compare it AN94 with a musket rifle... dumass.
RABBITANGRY 7 months ago
@RABBITANGRY The M16A2 isn't the same exact rifle as the M16 adopted in the sixties, so it's a fair.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 there is still 25 years age difference between m16a2 and an94. so its not fair at all
RABBITANGRY 6 months ago
@RABBITANGRY but the M16 is still gaining new advancements in its design
DrexCore 6 months ago
@DrexCore so as AK74 series... compare them, its fair
RABBITANGRY 6 months ago
LOL at that dude testing the M16A2. This is a great infomercial for their gun
chesterbesterfeild 7 months ago
@chesterbesterfeild oops forgot to clean it before sending
m16dude967 7 months ago
Haha, here I find all the kids talking about what they know from modern combat 2.
BigBananaMan 7 months ago
@BigBananaMan bad company 2
DonKapito 7 months ago 28
@BigBananaMan Modern Warfare 2* ;)
kissmyasssuckers 7 months ago
wait a minute...this isn't Battlefield!
Reiincarnation 8 months ago
M16a2 is better in terms of Accuracy, Persision, and weight, So it would definatly be my chose for combat
lookatthewholepictur 8 months ago
@lookatthewholepictur How exactly did you figure that out? the video only showed them in fully automatic fire, which would make it a comparison of controllability .
inkbot2000 7 months ago
@inkbot2000 The way the M16 was designed to push the recoil directly back to your shoulder, producing less muzzle rise, the AK series rifles are made with the Idea of trench warfare in mind and were designed for such, and thats why the AK rifles have more kick, which makes the M16 more precise since you will be able to keep the weapon more on target, And it's accuracy is better because it shoots a 5.56 x 45 round instead of a 7.62 x 39 or 5.45 x 39, so the bullet to it is longer,thereofoe acurte
lookatthewholepictur 7 months ago
@lookatthewholepictur the length of the CARTRIDGE, not bullet, has little to do with accuracy.
inkbot2000 7 months ago
@inkbot2000 The bullet design can have a huge impact on accuracy. A flat nosed bullets won't be as aerodynamic as a spitzer shaped bullet.
esh325 6 months ago
@esh325 Yes, but he was talking about CARTRIDGE length, not bullet shape. Match grade rounds can be made in both calibres.
inkbot2000 6 months ago
@lookatthewholepictur WTF are you going on about? Firstly the AN94 is not part of the AK series. The Nikonov series of rifles are designed to replace the Kalishnikov rifles. Second, Nikonov rifles are much more accurate, way easier to control, and reduce recoil by tons (first 2 shots leave the barrel before ANY recoil is felt).
mauiboynokaoi 7 months ago 12
@mauiboynokaoi thats why its either 2 round burst or full auto i suppose
DrexCore 6 months ago
@mauiboynokaoi I've heard it's more difficult to field strip.
DRGgang2 6 months ago
@DRGgang2 I've heard quite the same, the armorers worst nightmare.
MrThomPS3 6 months ago
@DRGgang2 It is a vastly more complex design nothing like Kalishnikov rifles at all. Not only is it difficult to field strip, but it also suffers from reliability issues like the AR-15 rifles and their derivatives and thus requires careful maintenance. Plus it fires a tiny round even smaller than the M16. IMO it was a waste of resources on Russia's part but that's just my opinion.
mauiboynokaoi 6 months ago
@mauiboynokaoi да он хорош в тире, да и то есть вопросы когда клину дает, но в боевых условиях он АН проигрывает, кому нужен автомат если из него нельзя стрелять, очень не надежная машина... да вопрос ко всем кто нибудь из вас его хотя бы в руках держал, сомневаюсь, а на заборе можно написать что и рогатка стреляет баллистическими ракетами, да бой точный, но не надежный, проверено даже рядовыми спецназа ГРУ...
kompass7 4 months ago
@mauiboynokaoi No, the AN-94 was made to replace the AK-74 rifle. It uses the same bullet but it has greater range and less recoil.
The new series of AK rifles are much more powerful, range is limited and recoil is less.
Noxnaxia 4 months ago
@Noxnaxia What you mean the AK-100 series? The latest Kalishnikov (107/108 models) both feature a gas operation completely different from traditional Kalishnikov rifles (designed by Alexandrov). The AK-74 and its carbine variant the AK-105 remain the main service rifles for the Russian army. The AN-94 was designed to make obsolete AK rifles and their variants. It failed at that. Too expensive, complex, and unreliable.
mauiboynokaoi 4 months ago
@mauiboynokaoi The Klashnikov rifles were designed by Kalashnikov, not Alexandrov, and that wasn't the point.
The idea was to replace the AK-74 with the AN-94 but they haven't done it yet.
Noxnaxia 4 months ago
@Noxnaxia I didn't say the rifle was designed by Alexandrov I said the gas operated mechanism was. And the idea was to replace all AK models due to the shortcomings in terms of recoil and accuracy but again, that will never happen. AN-94s are too expensive, too complex, and too unreliable. Just because a gun was supposed to do something doesn't mean that's what it really does.
mauiboynokaoi 4 months ago
@mauiboynokaoi I never said that and I don't know about it being unreliable, but it can shoot further.
Noxnaxia 4 months ago
@lookatthewholepictur I don't remember reading anywhere that the AK-47 was designed specifically to fight in trenches, but I'm sure it could if it had do. The AK-47 has more kick because it fires a heavier grain bullet that generates more recoil.
esh325 6 months ago
@lookatthewholepictur the whole time i read this i couldn't get out of my head "the AK series rifles are made with the Idea of trench warfare in mind"
oh god, this is just too funny.
burningsponge 5 months ago
@ 0:44 thats no an AN-94. Looks more like an AK-107.
Comradevoss 8 months ago
@Comradevoss true! The AN94 has the gas tube under the barell.
Dgl44 7 months ago
@Dgl44 No, the tube under the barrel is a guide for the moving barrel
inkbot2000 7 months ago
@inkbot2000 Oh.. But were is the gas tube then? Or is the whole blowback mechanism different?
Dgl44 7 months ago
@Dgl44 The gas tube is above the barrel hidden by the handguard.
inkbot2000 7 months ago
M14 EBR way better then both
vinillanut 8 months ago
@vinillanut not even. M14 was a complete flop. At medium to Long range you either hit your target with one shot or they would get to cover by the time you could line it up for another.
AMT4245 8 months ago
@ISR1917 The AK are great solely for the reason that you can fire it after 1000years of torture. They are reliable as fuck. But the M16 is so much smoother in its operation than the AN/AK. The 5.56 is a great round. The only thing I do not appreciate about the 5.56 is that is cannot penetrate cinderblock walls and tag the person behind it like the 7.62x39 can. In urban warfare I do agree that the AK is better than the M16 because it can take out the cover you are hiding behind.
Army19D619 8 months ago
@Army19D619 Now i agree with you all the way but you can't entirely say that about the AN-94 because its almost impossible to have it in the US and therefore cant say if its 2 shot burst option is or isin't as smooth as the M16 whether in burst or single fire but your other points are right about the AK and M16 respectively, they both have their pros and cons and are great depending in what situation they are put in, but in my point of view I would pick the An if i could ever get my hands on it.
MrSupermac1234 8 months ago
i dont know why comparing ak-47 whit m16 when this video is about an-94 vs m16
the an-94 uses a different cartridge (5,45 x 39mm) that is more accurate then the ak-47 7.62x39
AKYP01 8 months ago
@ISR1917 Well yeah they did in Vietnam because the Army went in thinking that the M16 never needed to be clean which we all know is a total lie that bitch get dirty haha fucking star chamber... If you keep it clean it will take care of you. It is a reliable weapon if properly cared for.
Army19D619 8 months ago
@ISR1917 I wouldn't give up my M4. I would like the M16 due to the 20" barrel for maximum velocity. But the ability to care vast amounts of ammo attracts me to the M4 over the AK if it were laying right in front of me. The wounding properties of the 5.56 is better than the 7.62x39. Better accuracy, flater trajectory, further range. It is an all out better round. Yeah the M16/4 does jam every once in awhile if you don't take care of it. It's not a caveman's rifle like the AK.
Army19D619 8 months ago
I lold at the supposed "spread" of the M16. Since when does it have vertical climb that high? Especially when it seems like hes firing semi auto. Unless hes firing full auto, I find the results pretty sketchy.
AwookieGaming 8 months ago
@AwookieGaming It is bullshit propaganda. Russia has to produce bullshit results for our superior equipment to make their useless nation feel better about how poor and less technical they are than us. Russian made things are shit. We have both quantity and quality whereas Russia just has quantity. That is their philosophy in war. Overwhelm the enemy with huge numbers with shit equipment that against a superior nation like the US with advanced technology, does not work. We could just use a UAV :D
Army19D619 8 months ago
Some times i come back here repeatly, and see the same shitty amount of crappy COD whores or pseudo "marine" bashing theyr shit based on the magic stick stuffed in their ass. Jesus... AN94 is MAKE to be accurate in auto, unlike M16, it's logical it has a better grouping. For semi auto, both are as good.
PATRONSKiii 8 months ago
This video does not prove shit. M-16 shits on the AN-94.
Army19D619 8 months ago
@Army19D619 its the jams alot m16 vs the jesus-94
Sappette 8 months ago
@Sappette Yeah that must be it. My M-16 never jammed as long as you take care of it, it will take care of you. You Russian's just like dirty shit so you make shit that never has to be cleaned. Everything Russia makes it garbage. Everything the US military purchases is high quality shit. Hooah. Fuck Russia. The M-16 is way more accurate and has a max range of 550m as oppose to the AK which is about 200-300m which means accuracy and range are proven better in the M-16. Fuck Russia propaganda.
Army19D619 8 months ago
@Army19D619
no offence but you sound like hillbilly redneck.
moepOo 8 months ago
@moepOo Haha I am from Southern California. Far from it fucknut.
Army19D619 8 months ago
russians are always drunk :D
torcidaSTobrec 8 months ago
I like the AN94 and I'm american. its pretty unique, but its fuckin expensive.
tuck234 9 months ago
capitalism, communism same damn thing both can work but its the people that dont work. America is a great place to live it has it problems but what country dosent
negima47 9 months ago
keep in mind both guns are crap. why? because both guns use crappy ammo. the an94 uses a 5.45x.39 round which has poor range and little punching power get throughheavy vests. the 5.56x.45 is no different. it has poor range alittle more (but not by much) punching power than the 5.45. both rounds were designed for the spray and prey doctine created by european military doctrine of puting alot of fire on your enemy and one will hit him. both guns dont deserve these rounds and could be alot better
frightner24 9 months ago
@frightner24
Isn't the whole point of the AN94's mechanism to negate the weakness of its cartridge's armour penetration with the 2-round burst? In any case the higher accuracy would probably take a bit of the 'pray' out of 'spray-n-pray'.
DoesThisNameWorkYet 9 months ago
@DoesThisNameWorkYet yes thats true but the point i was trying to make is that those types of rounds are designed to be fired in full auto. it was made to be light so that more magazines can be carried (range degraded). just think if the an94 used a 6.5 grendal round or the 6.8 (both rounds out preform the 7.62 in almost every way) it would make the an94 the superior weapon to have right now. the m16 would be 10 times as good since its more of a marksmans rifle anyway. see what im saying
frightner24 9 months ago
@frightner24 Agreed. The 6.5mm and 6.8mm round outperform both the 7.62mm and the 5.56mm in my opinion. 5.56mm is nearly useless because it can't put people down, and the 7.62mm round is just as useless because it's maximum effective range is shit. 6.5mm or 6.8mm is the optimal size for all GENERAL engagement.
GodKiller97 9 months ago
0.39 "This gun is suck"
1481001806 9 months ago
everything sucks and fat in america
vasyasol 9 months ago
@vasyasol And apparently you russian dogs dont know how to spell
lookatthewholepictur 9 months ago
@lookatthewholepictur Do you know Russian? You have to know or you don't say about spell
musikant7 9 months ago
0:50-1:12 That's a weird helmet..
Crim15 9 months ago
the last phrase is:
"Right now I had shot from the vaunted american M16 A2, and our home assault rifle ASM, just adopted by the Russian army under the name Nikonov assault rifle. Firings results speak for themselves - Nikonov assault rifle exceed the M16 on the accuracy of fire, not less than ten times".
9Martel9 9 months ago
of course the Russians say their gun is better. its a propaganda technique.
MrSlowkid 10 months ago
@MrSlowkid well when i was in service in Afghanistan The m16a4 (I only used single fire because thats the best of three firing options) I found my m16 to Jam more then i would like it to. I never fired a AN95 abakan but I think it would be more reliable and Less likely to Fail on me. I went through 3 M16's over my 5 years But over all The m16 is a Good weapon.
mrcaliman95 10 months ago
it is not fair , everything is better than M16
ww2footage 10 months ago
the thing is, the m16 will fail on you all the time, you can't trust the m16 rifle, cus it jams to much. so AN-94 is much much better... cus it never fails on you, but if you guys want the best rifle in the world, then it's OC-14-4A (Groza) it's a Bullpup version of the AK-47, and you all know that the ak-47 never jams with proper amunation, never ever....
but of course, there are plenty other rifle out there that works, but m16/m4 based rifles isn't one of them.....
olavtorjus95 10 months ago
@olavtorjus95 - Lol - How can you have a bullpop version of ANY gun? Do you even know what a bullpup is? - you would have to completely redesign the gun
The designers of the OC-14-4A actually used the AK-74U as influence, meaning they wanted a small weapon which handled very well in CQB - hence why they made a bullpup
Guns like the Tar-21, Famas and L85a2 make WAY better bullpup rifles than the OC-14-4A
If reliability is the most important factor for you, then why say a bullpup is best?
TomHartill 10 months ago
@TomHartill lol, there are even bullpup versions of the m4 carbine, and many many more, the reson the Groza is the best is bacause it has a ak receiver, one of the best receivers that excists. but like l85 its not posible for a lefty to use, (i'm a lefty) that's why i like the steyr aug the best, you can change the shell port ejection:)
olavtorjus95 10 months ago
@olavtorjus95 - well all the AK series of guns will have very similar parts, but your talking about a bullpup which is a very much a different design, there are only so many parts a bullpup could share. Too be honest I wouldn't even class the OC-14-4A as an assault rifle but more of a SMG or carbine?
I guess if your a lefty then you wouldn't want red hot shell casings in your face with the L85 !! I seem to rember there being a reason for the L85 not being ambidextrous, cant rember it though.
TomHartill 10 months ago
@Robbieifyoucan Well I might be a dumbfuck but studies show that the 5.45x39 round has a much higher wounding potential over the 556 even if the 556 has a little more energy.
360deeman 10 months ago
M16 has a puny round but I would still take one over a AN-94
360deeman 10 months ago
@360deeman the AN94 is a smaller round dumbfuck
Robbieifyoucan 10 months ago
holy propaganda
ScarletAvatar 10 months ago
Haha! At 0:02 stupid americunts couldn't even write his surname properly! Hahaha! It's Nikonov! ;D Bunch'o retards!
Travmapunk 10 months ago
@Travmapunk wow... a typo... nobody every does that... Russians never do, Chinese never do, Spanish, English, German never do... I can't believe that America would be so stupid to make a small mistake that nobody even cares about and mister Gennadiy Nikonov probably immediately forgave them for... Big bad America never does anything right.
Volatality 10 months ago
@Volatality Wut can i say... That's the way it is! :P
Travmapunk 10 months ago
@Travmapunk - I am seriously thinking that Russians have a lower average IQ than the rest of the world!
This is judging from the number of the idiotic comments I see on youtube made by Russians. You guys also have a MASSIVE inferiority complex, I think its from all the propagander and BS your government feeds you.
TomHartill 10 months ago
@TomHartill HAS ANY AMERICAN EVER STOPPED AND LOOKED AT IT FROM THE OPPOSITE VIEW, EVERYTHING YOU SAY IS EITHER HYPOCRITICAL OR WITHOUT THE ABILITY TO REALISE, HEY, MABY THIS GUY JUST HAS ANOTHER OPINION, FOR EXAMPLE THE IDEA OF KOMMUNISM WAS TO ELIMINATE THE CLASS SYSTEM, TO GET EVERYONE EQUAL OPERTUNITY, NOT DUE TO BEING EVIL, FOR FUCK SAKES, AND I'M WRITING IN CAPITALS 'CAUSE ITS FUN. I'M LEAVING NOW SO DON'T BOTHER REPLYING, AND I'M AM NOT RUSSIAN, I GET INFO FROM USA, I READ BETWEEN LINES.
MasterofPuppets352 9 months ago
@MasterofPuppets352 - Well I'm not American, and actually I like aspects of communism and dont like capitalism so much.
TomHartill 9 months ago
@TomHartill Communism is great in theory. Throughout history though, the theory of communism being a successful type of government has been proven wrong. I think current day Russia might be the first example of a communist society that is actually working fairly well. American's just dont like communism because it goes against our democratic-republic government, which is what we've been fighting for throughout our American history. The idea of communism opposes it
GodKiller97 9 months ago