LOVE THIS MAN! you want to blow your mind? THIS IS SOMETHING THAT YOU DID NOT SEE IN ANY SCHOOL BOOK, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC, ETC, HOW IS IT THAT THE MOST INCREDIBLE ARCHITECTURAL FEAT IS NEVER DISCUSSED? ONLY EGYPT, AND EGYPT IS A MIDGET COMPARED TO BAALBEK!!! only after you read about Baalbek will you understand that THINGS HAVE BEEN HIDDEN FROM US ON PURPOSE! Baalbek is more signifigant than the PYRAMIDS! AND STONES THOUSANDS OF TONS BIGGER, PYRAMIDS 80TONS, baalbek 1200 tons
wow the ancients must have known how to make concrete pads then so that they could use a small stone to pivot there 100-200+ ton blocks across miles of grassy/sandy hills and valleys, i think a small stone would turn to dust under 100+ tons
They could have used mid-sized flat rocks as stepping stones, or some object other than pebbles to shift the weight, like small logs to go the long distance, pebbles and flat rocks for the refined maneuvering. This fellow probably doesn't have the exact technique used for Stonehenge, but that's not really the point. He's demonstrated that not only could it be done with very simple, primitive "equipment", but also that it might not have been that big a deal either.
Just so you know, it doesn't really make any sense to try to act like the other person in a conversation is retarded for still taking part in the conversation that you're also still taking part in.
Also I wouldn't call saying "you are literally retarded" an attempt to convert someone else to your views so much as trying to make someone feel bad about their inadequacies, but I guess that's what I get for being subtle.
I really don't care enough to argue but I want to make the point that he is moving these stones that weigh around 1 ton. Stonehenge is what, like 22 tons? Just food for thought. I don't think it's been proven or fully understood quite yet.
This video proves you can move big rocks sort of but not how giant 100+ ton slabs are transported miles n miles then used to build high Walls interlocked with no gaps inbetween and so precisely cut in ways we can't do today
@Paraphen haha what just for stating real facts.... some of the megoliths used to build some of the structures were 200+ tons....doesnt matter how many slaves or people there were then supposedly doing the lifting...ropes, levers, pulleys of that time weren't strong enough...even today this would be very difficult or maybe impossible
@MrBenchy35 if you genuinely believe that the blocks used to make stonehenge, the pyramids, etc. are "so precisely cut" that we "can't do [them] today" with computer controlled milling equipment, laser cutting, etc., then you're either an idiot or a liar and in neither case am I particularly apt to trust your knowledge of engineering
@MrBenchy35 yeah I'm not going to waste ten minutes on History Channel garbage, if there's a point in that video that proves that the egyptians were capable of achieving more precise stonecutting than we can today, post the timecode
@MrBenchy35 since I don't see you posting a timecode, I'm just going to assume I was right and that video doesn't have anything to do with your spurious claims about the "impossible" precision of ancient egyptian stonemasonry.
@Paraphen me posting a time code doesnt prove anything....I never mentioned the Egyptians in my pevious replies,....precision stone masonary is found in various places all over the world including Egypt...Mexico, South america but you'll know this from watching the video...and i know you did...it makes no difference to me wether you believe or not, but you wont convince me otherwise, Ive been researching stuff like this for the last 10 years from various sources...
@MrBenchy35 Yeah I think I mixed you up with someone else who was talking about the egyptians the other day. The reason I asked for a timecode is pretty simple. You imply that ancient structures exhibit stonecutting which is "so precisely cut in ways we can't do today". Given the capabilities of computer-controlled milling machines, lasers, etc., I find this hard to believe and questioned the validity of your claim. (continued...)
@MrBenchy35 I asked for a timecode because the first few minutes of the video didn't say anything about "impossible" precision in ancient stonework and I'm not about to waste my time trying to prove something that I believe is false; if you have evidence of an ancient structure that was, again, "so precisely cut in ways we can't do today", post it. If the video you already posted discusses that, then post roughly when in the video it happens.
@Paraphen oh you want it handed to you on a plate...because you cant be bothered to watch a ten minute film aaaaahahahahahaha...you've wasted more time replying to me hahaha
@MrBenchy35 if it takes you anywhere near ten minutes to complete a couple of youtube comments you might want to talk to a doctor about checking for developmental disabilities or something, that sounds like a bad sign.
@Paraphen Your still at it...Haha funny...perhaps you need to go and try to convert someone else to your views and way of thinking because your wasting your time with me
@VanishingNomad Exactly!...you have only got to ask yourself why dont we build things today using megoliths...probably because its easier not too...so why did the ancients build with massive blocks as appose to small ones, they must have had an easy way to move them that we haven't rediscovered....yet... Mr Leedskalnin did but didnt tell anyone
I have personally moved many rocks, mostly sandstone, weighing over two metric tonnes via similar methods. if the same theories and applications were applied to sandstone blocks of 40 tonne or more, you'd only need about 50 people (less even).... if you get true balance with stone, it's an easy thing to move.
Just some interesting trivia for those who doubt that modern man can move and lift stones weighing over 100 tonnes: the Alexander Column in St. Petersburg, Russia, a 25.45 meter-long piece of granite weighing about 600 tonnes, was erected in the 1830's without using any modern cranes.
reading the comments, everyone's talking about how to "move" heavy stones, sure, you could move 'em, sure you could stack 'em.....but how high can you stack 'em? like I said, even with so-called modern technology, try as we might, even with the mightiest cranes at our disposal, the Great Pyramids of Giza could NOT be replicated......until then, everything will be mere hollow intellectualizations borne of individual biases and beliefs.....
Currently our technology goes beyond the Khufu pyramid, for example :
With a total height of 472 meters, the Troll A oir rig is so far the largest structure ever to be built and moved. The total weight when launching was 1.2 million tons. 245,000 m³ of concrete and 100,000 tons of steel for reinforcement were used.
The heaviest stone at Khufu pyramid was just 80 tons. and most of the stones were under 2.5 tons.
As a curiosity... you can Google for "Enerpac - JH-1006 - 30022 100TON Hydraulic H". You can buy 10 of them, they cost about $2,592 usd each one. and lift a 1000 weight. (ok add two more to be on the safe side)...
@th4Guy77 Thanks for resurrecting my post, better late then never I guess. As far as the "badass" comment, I was full of liquid rage when I posted that and was fed up with the "aliens did it" assumption but sadly, I think I may have stepped on a believers foot so take my apology and please don't send your gray friends after me.
@MultiTaketwo Well, no one would want to say that what he is doing here isn't interesting, it is, however, to think that this explains all of the structures is quite a stretch. It's always been shown that small blocks, like the ones here, can be moved by various means. What has never been shown is how stones the size of Balbeck could be lifted and moved.
@MultiTaketwo Well, since you're the first person here to suggest that reptilians from the Draco constellation didn't do it, I can't help but wonder, is there some way that you know there is a reptilian race from Draco that did or didn't do something?
@somethingcomes never been shown? Really? Well, in Russia, human beings (not aliens) dug out and moved 1600 (!!) tons rock, which you can see now in St.Petersburg beneath the statue of St.Peter himself. Altrough it was done in 1770 there were no machines / lazer saws to move and then shape this huge rock. If you don't know something it doesn't mean aliens did it. Our brain is not only there to watch youtube))
@OttoMotos I'll believe it when I see it. And I haven't seen it yet. No one has demonstrated how tons of rock was lifted and moved, and I'm not talking about dragging it a few feet on the ground, I'm talking about moving it hundreds of miles and lifting it hundreds of feet. Course, all of you believe in Doug and Dave too, ROFL, so I don't want to spoil your tea party.
@MultiTaketwo most of these rocks is like sandcorns compare to what is used in ancient pyramids all over the world and has nothing to do with the designs or what they found inside them.you probably belive we are alone and thinks earth is the first planet and only but infact earth orginates from other planets as this earthly life aswell.
@BillionNames I believe that we are alone due to the fact that we are until further notice and no I don't believe that earth is the first planet due to the fact that there are other planets such as Mercury and Venus. You have no proof of anything other than life on earth.
@MultiTaketwo Becaus you have never been outside Earth and into the real heavens and never will.Nasa has already found many planets that is like Earth for xample Gliese 581 c wich were all over the news in sweden.We all entered this Earth without knowing where we really came from and why or what we really are.Our history are lost,we live under the heaven and we are stucked here till death takes us.
@BillionNames We came from star dust, the other planets are hundreds of light years away and counting and we are "stucked" here because our parents were drivin by their biological obligation to reproduce. Clear things up a bit?
Stonehedge reloaded. lol. This would be know as yantra movement in vedic culture. YANTRA = machine technology and this method would be nature-al N simple. While the coral castle would design used electro magnetism platforms(more advanced yantra, not more than vimana tech).
The 40 temples (in Armenia) of the Black boy(Krsna) built by a king carring the blocks made light by Gregor of Gregorian chanting (MANTRA sound power). C playlist ETHER ENERGY KIRLIAN
this guy used Bolts, Lumber, Perfect cut teetertot.. they didn't have that back then...... did this guy ever explain how they stacked the stones on top??? ALIENS....................
@cocojumb0 dude.. this video proves nothing.. they only thing they had back then was Slaves. 10000s of them. worked them to death. where did they get the stones? how?? slaves? extra help? i wanna see you move a 30 ton stone. and some of them weigh more.
To whom are you refering?. the workers of the pyramids were not slaves, but free men. The were well feed, well cared, we know this because the workers city has been excavated.
Also the quarry for 99% of the material was just a couple of km from there, since it was soft limestone. Only a few blocks came form long distances.
In stongenhe, it was built by the people living there, it took 1000 years to finish it.
@cocojumb0 Seems right. But what about where the stones were cut? and how they were transported to that area. How about the Incas structures like Machu Picchu? How did they build such structures. How did they amkes stones so fine cut to lay on top of each other? I ask because I lack the idea and am interested on another's opinion.
@Weston29406 i dont know, but i believe there is a much simpler explanation than aliens.
i dont say there arent aliens in the universe. its plausible and likely that there are but its very unplausible that they exist near us (which is still so far it would take us thousands of years) AND that they took the hassle to come to savages (compared to them) only to show us masonry (which we already knew).
Anything is possible, however this is not the way that Stone Henge or Coral Castle Was accomplished. There is a much easier way to do it. It's called Frequency Field Resonance...enough saud
@Magnetmotorman There's never enough said, which is easily witnessed by the comments on the video ;)
This guy is doing and sharing what he knows. If it's easier, how about ya show us? I don't care how, make a video, comment, give us links etc. Here's your audience! I assure you, they want to know.
@EpistemeUM Because it's easier for Magnetmotorman to say "magic" and leave it at that. Most of the people here are morons - it's something to keep in mind.
Egyptologists claim the great pyramid was built in 20 years. The great pyramid has 2.5 million blocks, each weighing from 5 to 20 tonnes. These blocks were quarried from 500 miles away through the desert, lifted and placed. To achieve this in 20 years, working 12 hour shifts 365 days a year, each massive block would have to be cut, quarried, lifted and placed every 3 minutes. All with copper chisels and stone mallets. And I’m to believe all this is based on “smart techniques”, FUCK OFF!
@seroeth You're reacting to the premise that this video claims to solve the mysteries of the pyramids. They aren't doing that. But maybe it's a clue. It's one man doing really big stuff. It's Ed Meeks, and maybe some of the ways he built coral castle. It's not a solution, it's just something that *might* be a clue to how it was done. Thinking the same hasn't taught us how they build the pyramids. It's thinking differently that will help us someday uncover the mystery. Thanks 4 watching!
This man alone took about a decade to figure how to move big blocks. Why we can not believe they solved their problem by years of experience. Remember Khuffu´s father Build Three piramids and two did not work... It was a process of trial and error.
No, 95% of the blocks are soft limestone and weight about 1 - 2.5 tones and the quarry is less than a kilometer away. Only some granite blocks, less that 0.05% were quarried 500 miles away and they were send by boat. (Nile river is less that two km from the pyramid.)
Thanks for posting a great video (shame about the sexist troll telling you to do make up videos down the page)
I think it shows that despite our thinking we know it all these days, they had a few tricks way back when, that we still havent got a handle on despite all our "cleverness" ;-)
One thing this guy did which is more important that moving anything any where is that he opened the door to a place where none of the rest of us even thought of going to. Moving huge blocks of concrete is one thing and he did it well, but quarrying a 25'x35'x115' monolithic block of granite which is over 260 tons, moving it 180 miles over mountains to the build site, and then standing it upright not once but dozens and dozens of times. Now that I would have loved to have seen how it was done.
@elnauhual One thing almost every ancient society who used monolithic building techniques share in common is the fact that none of them ever recorded the processes they utilized to accomplish such monumental feats. The other issue I have noticed is how wide spread this phenomenon is. If we had found these monolithic structures only in South America, Egypt, China, India, or Central Europe we could say they were just anomalies and ahead of the rest of the world, but all of them had it.
There are egyption and roman illustrations of the process, and the roman engineer Vitruvious wrote a treaty on the subject. Check for example the Hatseput queen drawings.
In america, Catholic priest burned almost all the native writings so we do not know if they wrote about it. Yet in america the moved stones were not as big as those moved by Romans.
This is total bull-crap. Sure he rolled a stone on those pieces of wood but now try doing that on an incline. there are hills and dips all over the land. When you put a rolling object on an incline where does it go? And the spinning trick he used to move the stone? He was spinning it on an already made flat stone surface. If he ever done this on bare ground the little stones underneath would sink into the ground and the friction of the ground would make it impossible to spin. This guy cheated.
@kingkirby117 Nobody really claims that this explains the whole process. It's just impressive that one guy can do so much - and gives us a couple clues as to how some of it could have been accomplished.
@kingkirby117 get a bigger rock to put the smaller rock on if it's on soft ground. problem solved. what do you think aliens making stone hedge is more plausible?
@listen2morehiphop Then how come the people who discovered the place didn't uncover those bigger rocks in the ground? Look how big those rocks are in the video, isn't it easier to bury those stones instead of going through the effort to dig them up again? That's the smarter thing to do because they weren't stupid back then. And try to roll those 45 ton rocks from the beach because they got those stones from wales so the expert say and push it up all those big inclines to the location, impossible
truth is, even with today's technology and the state of the art cranes, these ancient feats could not be replicated.........let's not even talk about the Great Pyramid of Giza......
Bullshit! One block in ideal conditions. How about 1000 or 100 000? Maybe million with 1000 ton for everyone? And maybe then you can drill a kilometers of tunnels inside your building with 20 centimeters in diameter? Why not if you such hero.
@josefataka One man moves one block. One hundred men moves one hundred blocks. Imagine what you could accomplish in 20 years with thousands of slaves and beasts of burden, and the best minds of your age, working for you. A very nice pyramid, at the very least.
This also doesn not address all of the other anomolies of the great pyramid (and other pyramids) such as the fact that they only had copper tools which would break if they tried to cut granite (even if they are "diamond tipped").
How exaclty did the Mayans move massive stones through the JUNGLE without any trace of ever doing that?
@bigdbram the mayans moved the stones exactly how everybody thought they did it, but cutting down trees and rolling them along them, the structures are simply much much older than everybody previously thought.
The problem is that you would have to QUARRY the 80 to 1000 ton stones first. LIFT them out of the quarry (without pebbles) and somehow get them onto pebbles. Then you would have to move them 500 miles across giant sand dunes, mountains, hills, and the nile river. If those stones ever fell off the pebbles (which is inevitable) you would somehow have to LIFT them back onto the pebbles. You would also have push these 50 ton stones up wooden ramps without the wood breaking.
@elnauhual There are stones in egypt that weigh hundreds of tons. Including one obelisk that weighs 1,100 tons. Khafre's pyramid contains a stone that weighs well over 100 tons.
Wrong in Egypt's case but for the mexican pyramids it was relatively close.
Those stones would sink any reed boat that attempted to float them.
I am using metric tonnes, the heaviest obelisk in egypt weights 950 tonnes. Romans took several obelisk over 500 tones from Egypt to Rome as souvernirs... they used boats. Also the took another 500 tone obelisk to Constantinople.
In the tomb of Hathseput Queen there are illustration of how they moved two obelisk in one boat. They were wood boast, not reeds
The heaviest block at the pyramids are those at the relieve chambers, just one of them is over 80 toones.
Mexican pyramids were made esentially of dirt encased in stone. The did not used big blocks on them. Most of it was massonery, that is why they losed their shape so easily.
In my British Literature class we read the book "London: The Novel" by
Edward Rutherfurd. One of the earliest chapters takes place during stonehenge, During the week we read that chapter we had an in-class project. At first we were given a plastic overhead sheet and marker to draw or explain how we think stonehenge was built. Knowing nothing of how it was built I illustrated something VERY similar to how Wallington is building his.
But on how the stones traveled. well Rope + Logs + Cattle
@Quartzzzz Whenever we see a truly impressive feat of ancient technology, when in doubt discount the ingenuity of human intelligence and chalk it up to aliens creating it. It blows the mind how people today think that people from thousands of years ago weren't intelligent and were extremely primitive. Wally's techniques of moving massive tonnage of stone by himself is making UFO believers extremely angry, because the concepts are so simple. How many $ millions is the UFO industry?
Ancient people were barely surviving they would have no energy or reason to build these and they were built by 1 of 2 things 1 being Ancient aliens 2 being A ancient human civilization that was highly advanced that died off from a natural world wide disaster
@KevinCarbonara They did not have cement in those days thats the only reason this man was able to solo his creation Ancient cultures would of had thousands working on this but AS i said they would not have the energy or reason to build these They were created by a highly advanced race or aliens end of story
@Entropian2012 Stonehenge was used by Druids as a Calendar
There are many valid theories based on materials available back then on how it was built. How the rope was made, Cattle pulling the Stones which were put over logs that were constantly rotated to help "roll" the stones over many miles. Another way was pulling/pushing the stones over a sort of "Ski" and placing animal fat on the wood to slide.
The unsolved mystery, like Easter Island is WHERE these large slabs of stone came from.
The organization necessary to build giant structures also allowed those civilization to use thos energies to other tasks. Egyptians also did public structures, that allowed them to be prosper. for example there is a damn near the delta, that involves about four times more material than Khuffu pyramid.
Also, the pyramids were not built by slaves. The workers city and their tombs show us the were well feed and well cared. The best of egypt was used to feed them.
@elnauhual These structures are older then recorded history goes back. So stop pretending you have a clew on how they were built... They were either created by 1. Advanced human race that died off Or Alien intervention.. Our own modern Engineers say they could not replicate some of the ancient structures even if they tried..
There is no proof of that. The dating methods say otherwise. And you have asked the wrong engineers. I am an engineer and I know our current technology has surpassed those feats.
Romans and Egyptians moved objects up to 950 tonnes. Today we have flied objects up to 1,200 tonnes, lift weights up to 900,000 tonnes and moved icebergs up to 6,000,000 tonnes.
Well, how did they get the blocks on top of each other? and could they use that twisting method to move the blocks on mud? this only explains half of it if you ask me...
@elnauhual Still doesn't explain the technique used to get the blocks on top of each other... And I think it's the technique that's the interesting part of this... How long time it took or how many people involved is not very intersesting...
Impressive feat, however if you look at the Baalbec stones, which are 1000 ton in weight and would simply crush any wood to jelly, and which were stacked to insane precision and make people look like ants then it doesnt matter if they had 10 thousand people or 1 million, it would still not work because there are no ropes that could lift this weight, if you exclude they used 20cm thick steel ropes used for giant bridges in modern times..
At Baalbeck there are only two block over 900 tons... but there are still at the quarry, one of them was not even finished... they simply could not move them to place.
The blocks used for construction were under 900 tones. and they had been moved less than a kilometer
If you go to rome you will find obelisk about 500 toones moved form Egypt as souvenirs. There are record on how they move them, less than, 2000 people, to moved them a distance 1000 longer than Baalbek.
And.. they were not lifted... the biggest blocks are at a lower level than the quarry and were used only that the basement.
And remember, the Roman polyspastos allowed one single people to lift about 3 tonnes. Just do some simple math. Also check the works of the roman Engineer "Vitruvious" on the techniques to move weights.
@wahhagoogoo I agree. Very impressive, yet so simple in concept. Even more impressive is how Wally moved these greats amounts of weight by himself. Add the teamwork of 50 men using these concepts and image how quickly all of this could be done! Bring in a team of 200 men? Using his teeter-totter method one could see how they raised the cross stones (plinths) of Stonehenge. The next challenge would be to move giant concrete slabs over 20 miles and duplicate one structure similar to Stonehenge.
Actually Stone henge more than likely was built with ramps and dirt piles.
They would have large dirt piles the entire size of the blocks and then dig straight down to create a pocket for the blocks to slide into. Once they do that they would build ramps which they used to go the stones inside. After they position all the stones in place they just clear away the dirt piles and you have yourself stone henge.
Got it! Just a note though! Unlike when people speak face to face or even on the phone, there's no way to know that from the written word. The reader can't infer the tone.
@mrwells111 Update your info. Many roads of varying quality have been found straight to stonehenge, at least 3000 years before romans buildt anything.
@mrwells111 Yes All the way up to and inside stonehenge. 3 pathways of timber has been found. One has been excavated. Poles has been driven 10 feet into the ground to make a sturdy foundation.
@Culturealimprovement Hardly concrete foundations are they. I'm not suggesting aliens built them though. Dont misundertand what I am saying. Coral castle was built without this performance by one man. He would lay massive stones in a day.
@Agui007 It's NOT solved. It has just been shown to be possible but it has not been shown to be the method used for Stonehenge! You're doing what many people do. You're jumping to unfounded conclusions.
The interesting part is that not a single one of you who replied to me even addressed anything from my comment, and none of you are capable of using proper grammar or spelling. So I'm pretty much not interested in talking to you. This video does not prove anything except that he can move stones short distances using simple techniques. It's not answering many questions at all to be honest, and frankly it's ridiculous that he wants people to buy his dvd before revealing the full technique.
LOVE THIS MAN! you want to blow your mind? THIS IS SOMETHING THAT YOU DID NOT SEE IN ANY SCHOOL BOOK, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC, ETC, HOW IS IT THAT THE MOST INCREDIBLE ARCHITECTURAL FEAT IS NEVER DISCUSSED? ONLY EGYPT, AND EGYPT IS A MIDGET COMPARED TO BAALBEK!!! only after you read about Baalbek will you understand that THINGS HAVE BEEN HIDDEN FROM US ON PURPOSE! Baalbek is more signifigant than the PYRAMIDS! AND STONES THOUSANDS OF TONS BIGGER, PYRAMIDS 80TONS, baalbek 1200 tons
countessarcadius 2 days ago
wow the ancients must have known how to make concrete pads then so that they could use a small stone to pivot there 100-200+ ton blocks across miles of grassy/sandy hills and valleys, i think a small stone would turn to dust under 100+ tons
MrBenchy35 4 days ago
@MrBenchy35
They could have used mid-sized flat rocks as stepping stones, or some object other than pebbles to shift the weight, like small logs to go the long distance, pebbles and flat rocks for the refined maneuvering. This fellow probably doesn't have the exact technique used for Stonehenge, but that's not really the point. He's demonstrated that not only could it be done with very simple, primitive "equipment", but also that it might not have been that big a deal either.
AarowSwift 2 days ago
Fuck Chuck Norris, this guy is awesome!
TheLibertyRPG 1 week ago
Now if I arrive home and my house has turned around, I know who to blame.
csykes23 1 week ago
Just so you know, it doesn't really make any sense to try to act like the other person in a conversation is retarded for still taking part in the conversation that you're also still taking part in.
Also I wouldn't call saying "you are literally retarded" an attempt to convert someone else to your views so much as trying to make someone feel bad about their inadequacies, but I guess that's what I get for being subtle.
Paraphen 2 weeks ago
Молодец мужик!!!! Это поистине грандиозный труд!!! РЕСПЕКТ!!!!
REMBOSH131 2 weeks ago
Add the fact that there was a ton of slaves back then...
R3APER24 3 weeks ago
I've moved granite blocks & large granite designed en-caps that weight around 800 lbs all by myself. It's all about leverage :)
WulfBand 3 weeks ago
when hes not busy killing ppl, wally is in his backyard moving heavy blocks.
DoubleAWilly 3 weeks ago
I really don't care enough to argue but I want to make the point that he is moving these stones that weigh around 1 ton. Stonehenge is what, like 22 tons? Just food for thought. I don't think it's been proven or fully understood quite yet.
IAmMichaelMyers 3 weeks ago
Also i want to know where i can get my hands on a 19,000 pound block of concrete
quisp2112 4 weeks ago
This man proves once again that a well thought-out, rational, and clever explanation always triumphs over crazy theories and superstition.
quisp2112 4 weeks ago
This video proves you can move big rocks sort of but not how giant 100+ ton slabs are transported miles n miles then used to build high Walls interlocked with no gaps inbetween and so precisely cut in ways we can't do today
MrBenchy35 4 weeks ago
@MrBenchy35 you are literally retarded
Paraphen 2 weeks ago
@Paraphen haha what just for stating real facts.... some of the megoliths used to build some of the structures were 200+ tons....doesnt matter how many slaves or people there were then supposedly doing the lifting...ropes, levers, pulleys of that time weren't strong enough...even today this would be very difficult or maybe impossible
MrBenchy35 2 weeks ago
@MrBenchy35 if you genuinely believe that the blocks used to make stonehenge, the pyramids, etc. are "so precisely cut" that we "can't do [them] today" with computer controlled milling equipment, laser cutting, etc., then you're either an idiot or a liar and in neither case am I particularly apt to trust your knowledge of engineering
Paraphen 2 weeks ago
@Paraphen Heres something for you to watch..... watch?v=2CROKOVaYGE
MrBenchy35 2 weeks ago
@MrBenchy35 yeah I'm not going to waste ten minutes on History Channel garbage, if there's a point in that video that proves that the egyptians were capable of achieving more precise stonecutting than we can today, post the timecode
Paraphen 2 weeks ago
@Paraphen ....which is why i can see you haven't got a clue...
MrBenchy35 2 weeks ago
@MrBenchy35 since I don't see you posting a timecode, I'm just going to assume I was right and that video doesn't have anything to do with your spurious claims about the "impossible" precision of ancient egyptian stonemasonry.
Paraphen 2 weeks ago
@Paraphen me posting a time code doesnt prove anything....I never mentioned the Egyptians in my pevious replies,....precision stone masonary is found in various places all over the world including Egypt...Mexico, South america but you'll know this from watching the video...and i know you did...it makes no difference to me wether you believe or not, but you wont convince me otherwise, Ive been researching stuff like this for the last 10 years from various sources...
MrBenchy35 2 weeks ago
@MrBenchy35 Yeah I think I mixed you up with someone else who was talking about the egyptians the other day. The reason I asked for a timecode is pretty simple. You imply that ancient structures exhibit stonecutting which is "so precisely cut in ways we can't do today". Given the capabilities of computer-controlled milling machines, lasers, etc., I find this hard to believe and questioned the validity of your claim. (continued...)
Paraphen 2 weeks ago
@MrBenchy35 I asked for a timecode because the first few minutes of the video didn't say anything about "impossible" precision in ancient stonework and I'm not about to waste my time trying to prove something that I believe is false; if you have evidence of an ancient structure that was, again, "so precisely cut in ways we can't do today", post it. If the video you already posted discusses that, then post roughly when in the video it happens.
Paraphen 2 weeks ago
@Paraphen oh you want it handed to you on a plate...because you cant be bothered to watch a ten minute film aaaaahahahahahaha...you've wasted more time replying to me hahaha
MrBenchy35 2 weeks ago
@MrBenchy35 if it takes you anywhere near ten minutes to complete a couple of youtube comments you might want to talk to a doctor about checking for developmental disabilities or something, that sounds like a bad sign.
Paraphen 2 weeks ago
@Paraphen Your still at it...Haha funny...perhaps you need to go and try to convert someone else to your views and way of thinking because your wasting your time with me
MrBenchy35 2 weeks ago
@MrBenchy35
It also does not explain how s is done WITHOUT a super flat concert surface to move the rocks on.
The ancients had to do this over all sorts of terrain. His little rock idea will not work on soft earth.
VanishingNomad 1 week ago
@VanishingNomad Exactly!...you have only got to ask yourself why dont we build things today using megoliths...probably because its easier not too...so why did the ancients build with massive blocks as appose to small ones, they must have had an easy way to move them that we haven't rediscovered....yet... Mr Leedskalnin did but didnt tell anyone
MrBenchy35 4 days ago
Maybe this guys an alien. lol
luckycharmz336 4 weeks ago
Try quarrying out granite blocks... and very accurately... This video did not show that part...
tungsten33 1 month ago
STONEHEDGE 2.0 awesome
ThirdProverb 1 month ago
I have personally moved many rocks, mostly sandstone, weighing over two metric tonnes via similar methods. if the same theories and applications were applied to sandstone blocks of 40 tonne or more, you'd only need about 50 people (less even).... if you get true balance with stone, it's an easy thing to move.
7hac 1 month ago
genius
farro1224 1 month ago 11
Epic!!!
BrokenYamato 1 month ago
well done wally...
themightyQ77 1 month ago
Little puny blocks he's moving.
Signifier7 1 month ago
This man is a hoax machine
Signifier7 1 month ago
Just some interesting trivia for those who doubt that modern man can move and lift stones weighing over 100 tonnes: the Alexander Column in St. Petersburg, Russia, a 25.45 meter-long piece of granite weighing about 600 tonnes, was erected in the 1830's without using any modern cranes.
umbrellashotgunman 1 month ago
ROFL. If we have toughguys like this, why we still use our technologies? This technic to slow to use it.
ultracelestial 1 month ago
I´m not saint it was Aliens but....
BoxeJudo 1 month ago
type in the search : ДРЕВНИЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ БОГОВ
alexey250289 1 month ago
Comment removed
alexey250289 1 month ago
Let this clown sawed a block of basalt 50 thousand tons. Any idiot of concrete is able to do
alexey250289 1 month ago
Comment removed
alexey250289 1 month ago
This will help skeptics to sleep at night but there's no way this would work for the 400 ton blocks at the temple of jupiter in lebanon.
rick4evergreen 1 month ago
Very interesting and very clever. I'm amazed that someone from the regular populace can show all these PHD's in physics, etc. how it is done.
GUALLACOL 1 month ago
Guys got an interesting interest, I love it.
MadeInOregon27 2 months ago
Give hin a place to stand on, and he'll move the Earth.
carashis 2 months ago
reading the comments, everyone's talking about how to "move" heavy stones, sure, you could move 'em, sure you could stack 'em.....but how high can you stack 'em? like I said, even with so-called modern technology, try as we might, even with the mightiest cranes at our disposal, the Great Pyramids of Giza could NOT be replicated......until then, everything will be mere hollow intellectualizations borne of individual biases and beliefs.....
sincocuerdas 2 months ago
@sincocuerdas
Currently our technology goes beyond the Khufu pyramid, for example :
With a total height of 472 meters, the Troll A oir rig is so far the largest structure ever to be built and moved. The total weight when launching was 1.2 million tons. 245,000 m³ of concrete and 100,000 tons of steel for reinforcement were used.
The heaviest stone at Khufu pyramid was just 80 tons. and most of the stones were under 2.5 tons.
elnauhual 2 months ago
he still never explained how he stacks the Circle Layer on top....
MFRoosy16 2 months ago
@MFRoosy16 He explained that in the begining when he get up little by little the huge rock...
linktube06 2 months ago
As a curiosity... you can Google for "Enerpac - JH-1006 - 30022 100TON Hydraulic H". You can buy 10 of them, they cost about $2,592 usd each one. and lift a 1000 weight. (ok add two more to be on the safe side)...
Just to check for the state of modern technology.
elnauhual 2 months ago
LOL!!!!! No it was aliens ROFL FUCK! thanks for this video hopefully the ufo tards can get lost. or beamed up abducted etc...
MultiTaketwo 2 months ago 4
@MultiTaketwo - Getting beamed up sounds fun!!
EpistemeUM 2 months ago
@MultiTaketwo Woah watch out, We've got a badass over here
th4Guy77 2 months ago
@th4Guy77 Thanks for resurrecting my post, better late then never I guess. As far as the "badass" comment, I was full of liquid rage when I posted that and was fed up with the "aliens did it" assumption but sadly, I think I may have stepped on a believers foot so take my apology and please don't send your gray friends after me.
MultiTaketwo 2 months ago
@MultiTaketwo I'm not a believer I just do that to all ragers
th4Guy77 2 months ago
@MultiTaketwo Well, no one would want to say that what he is doing here isn't interesting, it is, however, to think that this explains all of the structures is quite a stretch. It's always been shown that small blocks, like the ones here, can be moved by various means. What has never been shown is how stones the size of Balbeck could be lifted and moved.
somethingcomes 1 month ago
@somethingcomes Just because you don't know how "Balbeck" sized stones are moved doesn't mean a reptilian race from the Draco constellation did it.
MultiTaketwo 1 month ago
@MultiTaketwo Well, since you're the first person here to suggest that reptilians from the Draco constellation didn't do it, I can't help but wonder, is there some way that you know there is a reptilian race from Draco that did or didn't do something?
somethingcomes 1 month ago
@somethingcomes never been shown? Really? Well, in Russia, human beings (not aliens) dug out and moved 1600 (!!) tons rock, which you can see now in St.Petersburg beneath the statue of St.Peter himself. Altrough it was done in 1770 there were no machines / lazer saws to move and then shape this huge rock. If you don't know something it doesn't mean aliens did it. Our brain is not only there to watch youtube))
OttoMotos 4 weeks ago
@OttoMotos I'll believe it when I see it. And I haven't seen it yet. No one has demonstrated how tons of rock was lifted and moved, and I'm not talking about dragging it a few feet on the ground, I'm talking about moving it hundreds of miles and lifting it hundreds of feet. Course, all of you believe in Doug and Dave too, ROFL, so I don't want to spoil your tea party.
somethingcomes 4 weeks ago
@MultiTaketwo Doesnt explain Coral Castle. :)
dirint 1 month ago
@dirint I also doesn't explain aurora borealis or Brittney spears what your point?
MultiTaketwo 1 month ago
@MultiTaketwo most of these rocks is like sandcorns compare to what is used in ancient pyramids all over the world and has nothing to do with the designs or what they found inside them.you probably belive we are alone and thinks earth is the first planet and only but infact earth orginates from other planets as this earthly life aswell.
BillionNames 1 month ago
@BillionNames I believe that we are alone due to the fact that we are until further notice and no I don't believe that earth is the first planet due to the fact that there are other planets such as Mercury and Venus. You have no proof of anything other than life on earth.
MultiTaketwo 1 month ago
@MultiTaketwo Becaus you have never been outside Earth and into the real heavens and never will.Nasa has already found many planets that is like Earth for xample Gliese 581 c wich were all over the news in sweden.We all entered this Earth without knowing where we really came from and why or what we really are.Our history are lost,we live under the heaven and we are stucked here till death takes us.
BillionNames 1 month ago
@BillionNames We came from star dust, the other planets are hundreds of light years away and counting and we are "stucked" here because our parents were drivin by their biological obligation to reproduce. Clear things up a bit?
MultiTaketwo 1 month ago
Stonehedge reloaded. lol. This would be know as yantra movement in vedic culture. YANTRA = machine technology and this method would be nature-al N simple. While the coral castle would design used electro magnetism platforms(more advanced yantra, not more than vimana tech).
The 40 temples (in Armenia) of the Black boy(Krsna) built by a king carring the blocks made light by Gregor of Gregorian chanting (MANTRA sound power). C playlist ETHER ENERGY KIRLIAN
charukrsnadasa 2 months ago
this guy used Bolts, Lumber, Perfect cut teetertot.. they didn't have that back then...... did this guy ever explain how they stacked the stones on top??? ALIENS....................
MFRoosy16 3 months ago
@MFRoosy16 why aliens? just combine his method of raising stones and the other method of flipping them upright.
flip 2 stones and in the middle of them raise a stone. when its high enought turn it with his first method of moving the stone.
no fucking aliens involved.
cocojumb0 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos
@cocojumb0 dude.. this video proves nothing.. they only thing they had back then was Slaves. 10000s of them. worked them to death. where did they get the stones? how?? slaves? extra help? i wanna see you move a 30 ton stone. and some of them weigh more.
MFRoosy16 2 months ago
@MFRoosy16 so you think egyptions didnt have lumber? thats very ignorant. back then they had metal tools since they were an advanced civilization.
cocojumb0 2 months ago
@cocojumb0
Yes they had lumber. It was imported from Lebannon. Mainly it was used to build boats, and temples.
elnauhual 2 months ago
@MFRoosy16
To whom are you refering?. the workers of the pyramids were not slaves, but free men. The were well feed, well cared, we know this because the workers city has been excavated.
Also the quarry for 99% of the material was just a couple of km from there, since it was soft limestone. Only a few blocks came form long distances.
In stongenhe, it was built by the people living there, it took 1000 years to finish it.
elnauhual 2 months ago
@cocojumb0 Seems right. But what about where the stones were cut? and how they were transported to that area. How about the Incas structures like Machu Picchu? How did they build such structures. How did they amkes stones so fine cut to lay on top of each other? I ask because I lack the idea and am interested on another's opinion.
Weston29406 2 months ago
@Weston29406 i dont know, but i believe there is a much simpler explanation than aliens.
i dont say there arent aliens in the universe. its plausible and likely that there are but its very unplausible that they exist near us (which is still so far it would take us thousands of years) AND that they took the hassle to come to savages (compared to them) only to show us masonry (which we already knew).
cocojumb0 2 months ago
Very cool.
FromMuToYou 3 months ago
its a simple technique. no need for ALIENS MUST HAVE DUN IT!
cocojumb0 3 months ago
but can he carve the stones out of a quarry?
CHAM0RRITO 3 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
This has been flagged as spam show
Anything is possible, however this is not the way that Stone Henge or Coral Castle Was accomplished. There is a much easier way to do it. It's called Frequency Field Resonance...enough saud
Magnetmotorman 3 months ago in playlist Phenomenons / Crazy
@Magnetmotorman There's never enough said, which is easily witnessed by the comments on the video ;)
This guy is doing and sharing what he knows. If it's easier, how about ya show us? I don't care how, make a video, comment, give us links etc. Here's your audience! I assure you, they want to know.
EpistemeUM 3 months ago 4
@EpistemeUM Because it's easier for Magnetmotorman to say "magic" and leave it at that. Most of the people here are morons - it's something to keep in mind.
NC17Rated 2 months ago 4
@NC17Rated Yep, luckily this video attracts both types. Sometimes I get lucky. That said, thanks for commenting and not being a moron 8D
EpistemeUM 2 months ago
@NC17Rated mormons are people too
thoostorm4 2 months ago
Egyptologists claim the great pyramid was built in 20 years. The great pyramid has 2.5 million blocks, each weighing from 5 to 20 tonnes. These blocks were quarried from 500 miles away through the desert, lifted and placed. To achieve this in 20 years, working 12 hour shifts 365 days a year, each massive block would have to be cut, quarried, lifted and placed every 3 minutes. All with copper chisels and stone mallets. And I’m to believe all this is based on “smart techniques”, FUCK OFF!
seroeth 3 months ago
@seroeth You're reacting to the premise that this video claims to solve the mysteries of the pyramids. They aren't doing that. But maybe it's a clue. It's one man doing really big stuff. It's Ed Meeks, and maybe some of the ways he built coral castle. It's not a solution, it's just something that *might* be a clue to how it was done. Thinking the same hasn't taught us how they build the pyramids. It's thinking differently that will help us someday uncover the mystery. Thanks 4 watching!
EpistemeUM 3 months ago
@EpistemeUM Ed Leedskalnin...
1Rockbilly 3 months ago
@EpistemeUM
This man alone took about a decade to figure how to move big blocks. Why we can not believe they solved their problem by years of experience. Remember Khuffu´s father Build Three piramids and two did not work... It was a process of trial and error.
elnauhual 2 months ago
@seroeth
No, 95% of the blocks are soft limestone and weight about 1 - 2.5 tones and the quarry is less than a kilometer away. Only some granite blocks, less that 0.05% were quarried 500 miles away and they were send by boat. (Nile river is less that two km from the pyramid.)
Better check your sources.
elnauhual 2 months ago
HE IS AN ALIEN!
Itachi21x 3 months ago
Thanks for posting a great video (shame about the sexist troll telling you to do make up videos down the page)
I think it shows that despite our thinking we know it all these days, they had a few tricks way back when, that we still havent got a handle on despite all our "cleverness" ;-)
Peace ;-)
bluesman979 3 months ago
240p we meet again
flesme911 3 months ago
One thing this guy did which is more important that moving anything any where is that he opened the door to a place where none of the rest of us even thought of going to. Moving huge blocks of concrete is one thing and he did it well, but quarrying a 25'x35'x115' monolithic block of granite which is over 260 tons, moving it 180 miles over mountains to the build site, and then standing it upright not once but dozens and dozens of times. Now that I would have loved to have seen how it was done.
1955thekeeper 3 months ago
@1955thekeeper
But this man move this alone, in a few years. Stonehenge, for example, was built by a lot of people and took them 1000 years...
And just "recently"... Napoleon took an 500 toon obelisk from Egypt to Paris. That was interesting..
elnauhual 2 months ago
@elnauhual One thing almost every ancient society who used monolithic building techniques share in common is the fact that none of them ever recorded the processes they utilized to accomplish such monumental feats. The other issue I have noticed is how wide spread this phenomenon is. If we had found these monolithic structures only in South America, Egypt, China, India, or Central Europe we could say they were just anomalies and ahead of the rest of the world, but all of them had it.
1955thekeeper 2 months ago
@1955thekeeper
There are egyption and roman illustrations of the process, and the roman engineer Vitruvious wrote a treaty on the subject. Check for example the Hatseput queen drawings.
In america, Catholic priest burned almost all the native writings so we do not know if they wrote about it. Yet in america the moved stones were not as big as those moved by Romans.
elnauhual 2 months ago
This is total bull-crap. Sure he rolled a stone on those pieces of wood but now try doing that on an incline. there are hills and dips all over the land. When you put a rolling object on an incline where does it go? And the spinning trick he used to move the stone? He was spinning it on an already made flat stone surface. If he ever done this on bare ground the little stones underneath would sink into the ground and the friction of the ground would make it impossible to spin. This guy cheated.
kingkirby117 3 months ago
@kingkirby117 Nobody really claims that this explains the whole process. It's just impressive that one guy can do so much - and gives us a couple clues as to how some of it could have been accomplished.
EpistemeUM 3 months ago 6
@kingkirby117 This just helps explains some of the "mystery" architecture.
paddymoep 3 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
@kingkirby117 get a bigger rock to put the smaller rock on if it's on soft ground. problem solved. what do you think aliens making stone hedge is more plausible?
listen2morehiphop 3 months ago
@listen2morehiphop Then how come the people who discovered the place didn't uncover those bigger rocks in the ground? Look how big those rocks are in the video, isn't it easier to bury those stones instead of going through the effort to dig them up again? That's the smarter thing to do because they weren't stupid back then. And try to roll those 45 ton rocks from the beach because they got those stones from wales so the expert say and push it up all those big inclines to the location, impossible
kingkirby117 3 months ago
@kingkirby117 I had the same thought, but what about the house they moved?
1Rockbilly 3 months ago
@1Rockbilly a house is lighter than a 30 ton stone.
kingkirby117 3 months ago
Mesmo assistindo esse vídeo, as dúvidas permanecem: Como os antigos cortavam e moldavam as rochas? Como transportavam rochas enormes montanha acima?
ericgruby 3 months ago
wow thanks to the guy who posted this vid on youtube !
because it prooves there were no secrets about how to build great monuments but only smart cheats !
Folks always wonder how ancient people built giants monuments, but i always believed they had only smart techniques !
netix75 3 months ago
@netix75 You're welcome! But I'm a girl hehe
EpistemeUM 3 months ago
@EpistemeUM
really???? so why did you post this vid if you're a girl??? are your crazy???
try make up vids instead of being a tomboy !
netix75 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@netix75
"really???? so why did you post this vid if you're a girl??? are your crazy???
try make up vids instead of being a tomboy ! "
What are you, the self-appointed gender-specific activities designator ?
w w w . youtube . com / watch ?v=H73g7XcsJ0Q
Sexist twat
bluesman979 3 months ago
truth is, even with today's technology and the state of the art cranes, these ancient feats could not be replicated.........let's not even talk about the Great Pyramid of Giza......
sincocuerdas 3 months ago
@sincocuerdas
Are you kidding?... the heaviest object moved by romans and egyptians was 900 tones.
The heaviest object move by modern technology weighted 900,000 tonned. It was the Stafjord B platform.
The Saturn V rocket weight 1,200 tones.. and it could fly... Not to mention the crawler that transported the rocket...
elnauhual 2 months ago
hehe...roman have move 1000 t blocks...how the fuck they move that shit?
and the city Machu Picchu...2,400 metres above sea level ...how the hell they move Thousands of heavy stone blocks up in mountain?
NexusCool1 4 months ago
Bullshit! One block in ideal conditions. How about 1000 or 100 000? Maybe million with 1000 ton for everyone? And maybe then you can drill a kilometers of tunnels inside your building with 20 centimeters in diameter? Why not if you such hero.
josefataka 4 months ago
@josefataka One man moves one block. One hundred men moves one hundred blocks. Imagine what you could accomplish in 20 years with thousands of slaves and beasts of burden, and the best minds of your age, working for you. A very nice pyramid, at the very least.
LordThanathos 3 months ago
@LordThanathos, ok let us suppose. But how about tunnels and other drill holes? You know anything about that? Everyone is closing eyes on it.
josefataka 3 months ago
@josefataka
I think the best way to know more about this subject is to order the dvd made by this guy ! It is available on his site "The Forgotten Technology "
For my part, i have ordered it and i'm in hurry to watch it !
netix75 3 months ago
This also doesn not address all of the other anomolies of the great pyramid (and other pyramids) such as the fact that they only had copper tools which would break if they tried to cut granite (even if they are "diamond tipped").
How exaclty did the Mayans move massive stones through the JUNGLE without any trace of ever doing that?
ETC ETC ETC
bigdbram 4 months ago 3
@bigdbram the mayans moved the stones exactly how everybody thought they did it, but cutting down trees and rolling them along them, the structures are simply much much older than everybody previously thought.
harrisontan 4 months ago
The problem is that you would have to QUARRY the 80 to 1000 ton stones first. LIFT them out of the quarry (without pebbles) and somehow get them onto pebbles. Then you would have to move them 500 miles across giant sand dunes, mountains, hills, and the nile river. If those stones ever fell off the pebbles (which is inevitable) you would somehow have to LIFT them back onto the pebbles. You would also have push these 50 ton stones up wooden ramps without the wood breaking.
bigdbram 4 months ago 2
@bigdbram
there are NO 1000 tonne stones in the pyramids, only 4 block weighted more than 40 tones. (were used in the king´s chamber).
95% of the blocks were from a quarry about 1 mile away.
The granite block frrm Aswan were sent by boat. Nile river is less than two km from the pyramids.
elnauhual 2 months ago
@elnauhual There are stones in egypt that weigh hundreds of tons. Including one obelisk that weighs 1,100 tons. Khafre's pyramid contains a stone that weighs well over 100 tons.
Wrong in Egypt's case but for the mexican pyramids it was relatively close.
Those stones would sink any reed boat that attempted to float them.
bigdbram 2 months ago
@bigdbram
I am using metric tonnes, the heaviest obelisk in egypt weights 950 tonnes. Romans took several obelisk over 500 tones from Egypt to Rome as souvernirs... they used boats. Also the took another 500 tone obelisk to Constantinople.
In the tomb of Hathseput Queen there are illustration of how they moved two obelisk in one boat. They were wood boast, not reeds
The heaviest block at the pyramids are those at the relieve chambers, just one of them is over 80 toones.
elnauhual 2 months ago
@bigdbram
Mexican pyramids were made esentially of dirt encased in stone. The did not used big blocks on them. Most of it was massonery, that is why they losed their shape so easily.
elnauhual 2 months ago
In my British Literature class we read the book "London: The Novel" by
Edward Rutherfurd. One of the earliest chapters takes place during stonehenge, During the week we read that chapter we had an in-class project. At first we were given a plastic overhead sheet and marker to draw or explain how we think stonehenge was built. Knowing nothing of how it was built I illustrated something VERY similar to how Wallington is building his.
But on how the stones traveled. well Rope + Logs + Cattle
LilGhoulLolita 4 months ago
Aliens? Haha, people should give more props to human ingenuity.
Quartzzzz 4 months ago 11
@Quartzzzz Whenever we see a truly impressive feat of ancient technology, when in doubt discount the ingenuity of human intelligence and chalk it up to aliens creating it. It blows the mind how people today think that people from thousands of years ago weren't intelligent and were extremely primitive. Wally's techniques of moving massive tonnage of stone by himself is making UFO believers extremely angry, because the concepts are so simple. How many $ millions is the UFO industry?
SelfDeclaredBBQXpert 4 months ago
Amazing
commandorando123 4 months ago
Wallyhenge, Wallingtonhenge
MandoMohan 4 months ago
Ancient people were barely surviving they would have no energy or reason to build these and they were built by 1 of 2 things 1 being Ancient aliens 2 being A ancient human civilization that was highly advanced that died off from a natural world wide disaster
Entropian2012 4 months ago
@Entropian2012 Or one crazy dude, as demonstrated by this video
KevinCarbonara 4 months ago
@KevinCarbonara They did not have cement in those days thats the only reason this man was able to solo his creation Ancient cultures would of had thousands working on this but AS i said they would not have the energy or reason to build these They were created by a highly advanced race or aliens end of story
Entropian2012 4 months ago
@Entropian2012 Stonehenge was used by Druids as a Calendar
There are many valid theories based on materials available back then on how it was built. How the rope was made, Cattle pulling the Stones which were put over logs that were constantly rotated to help "roll" the stones over many miles. Another way was pulling/pushing the stones over a sort of "Ski" and placing animal fat on the wood to slide.
The unsolved mystery, like Easter Island is WHERE these large slabs of stone came from.
LilGhoulLolita 4 months ago
@LilGhoulLolita
Stonehenge was built 1000 years before the druids arrived to England...
The druids used, but they did not built it. It was built by the original england population, probably the ancestor of the scotts.
elnauhual 2 months ago
@Entropian2012
The organization necessary to build giant structures also allowed those civilization to use thos energies to other tasks. Egyptians also did public structures, that allowed them to be prosper. for example there is a damn near the delta, that involves about four times more material than Khuffu pyramid.
Also, the pyramids were not built by slaves. The workers city and their tombs show us the were well feed and well cared. The best of egypt was used to feed them.
elnauhual 2 months ago
@elnauhual These structures are older then recorded history goes back. So stop pretending you have a clew on how they were built... They were either created by 1. Advanced human race that died off Or Alien intervention.. Our own modern Engineers say they could not replicate some of the ancient structures even if they tried..
Entropian2012 2 months ago
@Entropian2012
There is no proof of that. The dating methods say otherwise. And you have asked the wrong engineers. I am an engineer and I know our current technology has surpassed those feats.
Romans and Egyptians moved objects up to 950 tonnes. Today we have flied objects up to 1,200 tonnes, lift weights up to 900,000 tonnes and moved icebergs up to 6,000,000 tonnes.
You must not underestimate human ingenuity.
elnauhual 2 months ago
Ancient Aliens made it
stumpyred 4 months ago
he deserves alot more attention/appreciation for this..
tnoonan3 4 months ago in playlist tnoonan3's favorites
Well, how did they get the blocks on top of each other? and could they use that twisting method to move the blocks on mud? this only explains half of it if you ask me...
kongotech2 4 months ago
@kongotech2
He do that in only one day... Stonehenge was built on a 1,000 years schedule... that may explain the other half...
elnauhual 4 months ago
@elnauhual Still doesn't explain the technique used to get the blocks on top of each other... And I think it's the technique that's the interesting part of this... How long time it took or how many people involved is not very intersesting...
kongotech2 4 months ago
Impressive feat, however if you look at the Baalbec stones, which are 1000 ton in weight and would simply crush any wood to jelly, and which were stacked to insane precision and make people look like ants then it doesnt matter if they had 10 thousand people or 1 million, it would still not work because there are no ropes that could lift this weight, if you exclude they used 20cm thick steel ropes used for giant bridges in modern times..
GLaDOSrev2 4 months ago
@GLaDOSrev2
At Baalbeck there are only two block over 900 tons... but there are still at the quarry, one of them was not even finished... they simply could not move them to place.
The blocks used for construction were under 900 tones. and they had been moved less than a kilometer
If you go to rome you will find obelisk about 500 toones moved form Egypt as souvenirs. There are record on how they move them, less than, 2000 people, to moved them a distance 1000 longer than Baalbek.
elnauhual 4 months ago
@GLaDOSrev2
And.. they were not lifted... the biggest blocks are at a lower level than the quarry and were used only that the basement.
And remember, the Roman polyspastos allowed one single people to lift about 3 tonnes. Just do some simple math. Also check the works of the roman Engineer "Vitruvious" on the techniques to move weights.
elnauhual 4 months ago
@GLaDOSrev2
But the Baalbeck stones, are still on the quarry, one of them still uncut.
They simply could not moved them.
The limit of ancient technology Roman and Egyptian) was about 900 tones. The roman engineer Vitruvius had a treaty about how to move them.
We know Romans used about 600 people to move the 500 tonne obelisk at istambul (taken form Egypt).
elnauhual 2 months ago
After studying this video it's obvious it was aliens who gave him the technology to move those blocks.
RedOrchestraTV 4 months ago
Even if this doesn't prove how they built stone henge its still pretty fucking impressive..
wahhagoogoo 4 months ago 13
@wahhagoogoo I agree. Very impressive, yet so simple in concept. Even more impressive is how Wally moved these greats amounts of weight by himself. Add the teamwork of 50 men using these concepts and image how quickly all of this could be done! Bring in a team of 200 men? Using his teeter-totter method one could see how they raised the cross stones (plinths) of Stonehenge. The next challenge would be to move giant concrete slabs over 20 miles and duplicate one structure similar to Stonehenge.
SelfDeclaredBBQXpert 4 months ago
@ At everyone arguing about Stone Henge.
Actually Stone henge more than likely was built with ramps and dirt piles.
They would have large dirt piles the entire size of the blocks and then dig straight down to create a pocket for the blocks to slide into. Once they do that they would build ramps which they used to go the stones inside. After they position all the stones in place they just clear away the dirt piles and you have yourself stone henge.
Bloodshotbuddah 4 months ago
Got it! Just a note though! Unlike when people speak face to face or even on the phone, there's no way to know that from the written word. The reader can't infer the tone.
mrfester42 4 months ago
Kewl, the stones on the great pyramids are 2 tons each..good luck with that.
IndiaSergeant 4 months ago
Thats great wally. Now can you do it on a dirt feild without the conviniant concrete foundation.
mrwells111 4 months ago
@mrwells111
Why? They had built flat, hard surfaces on straight roads to move the blocs around stonehenge too.
Culturealimprovement 4 months ago
@Culturealimprovement The Romans built roads but they were cobbled. Around Stone Henge its all feilds. Thank you!
mrwells111 4 months ago
@mrwells111 Update your info. Many roads of varying quality have been found straight to stonehenge, at least 3000 years before romans buildt anything.
Culturealimprovement 4 months ago
@Culturealimprovement Help me out. Are there any around stone henge?
mrwells111 4 months ago
@mrwells111 Yes All the way up to and inside stonehenge. 3 pathways of timber has been found. One has been excavated. Poles has been driven 10 feet into the ground to make a sturdy foundation.
Culturealimprovement 4 months ago
@Culturealimprovement Hardly concrete foundations are they. I'm not suggesting aliens built them though. Dont misundertand what I am saying. Coral castle was built without this performance by one man. He would lay massive stones in a day.
mrwells111 4 months ago
Stone henge solved! No questions asked. What an insult to anti gravity.
The real truth won't be shown on TV.
Agui007 4 months ago
@Agui007 It's NOT solved. It has just been shown to be possible but it has not been shown to be the method used for Stonehenge! You're doing what many people do. You're jumping to unfounded conclusions.
mrfester42 4 months ago
@mrfester42 I was actually being sarcastic in my first sentence.
Agui007 4 months ago
Okay he moved it! How the hell did they cut them?
theascendancyofchaos 4 months ago
So this is the proof Coral Castle was built this way? I don't think so.. seems way to hard.. ever been there.. i recommend you to.
SelSun83 4 months ago
The interesting part is that not a single one of you who replied to me even addressed anything from my comment, and none of you are capable of using proper grammar or spelling. So I'm pretty much not interested in talking to you. This video does not prove anything except that he can move stones short distances using simple techniques. It's not answering many questions at all to be honest, and frankly it's ridiculous that he wants people to buy his dvd before revealing the full technique.
UnorthodoxEntertainm 5 months ago