Ummmmm....that lady in the orange is dumb. If she read any of the rulings on the ourt, she would see it is all personal interpetion of law. Sorry, sweetie....
This woman Elisabeth) is thicker than a rock, she has no idea about the trails and tribulations of some her neighbors and I don't believe she much cares. I believe had any people in her family tree had ever gone through what others have and continue to do so, she would be singing a different tune. I agree with the Latina comment by our new Supreme Court Justice, Sonia Sotomayor and for those who don't, can get over the fact that there is a new America folks, either join or move elsewhere.
@Karma2Die4 The role of a supreme court judge is NOT to be sentimental and understanding. they are to have a dispassionate interpretation of original law.
Sotomayor is a member of La Raza! WTF?! She's a racist!
@VegasBilgeRat She is not a racist, when you have had only WHITE males sitting on the court and have ruled with an iron fist against those who do not look like them, then it is time to even the playing field as much as possible. I really do not care about those who seems to have a problem with her appointment, the rest of us had to endure the racist decision of this court from the time the pale faces' asses hit their chairs. Now, for those who object to her appointment, welcome to our WORLD!
@Karma2Die4 Your comment is filled with racism, so I'm going to interpret your rambling as "I'm a racist, and i want a racist on the supreme court who agrees with my racist garbage"
Only whites on the supreme court? I think you need to do a little research.
@Karma2Die4 point out these racist decisions in the last 4 years. Or are you asuming they made racist decisions simply because they are 'pale faces.' Im Latino(Cuban) if you were wondering.
@Karma2Die4@Karma2Die4 point out these racist decisions in the last 4 years. Or are you assuming they made racist decisions simply because they are 'pale faces.' Im Latino(Cuban) if you were wondering.
She'll be at Yankee Stadium for Opening Day as Justice emeritus,watching Justin Verlander no hit theeeee Yankees.If she doesn't rescue herself in the Jan eligibility case,she will be going,going,gone.
Why is Elisabeth saying emotion shouldn't be there when interpreting the laws? When talking about the trials for the terror suspects she gets all emotional bringing up that she knew someone who died in 9/11 therefore terror suspects should have no rights at all and we should continue kidnapping and torturing people. That seems like a decision based on emotion, which apparently we aren't supposed to be doing? There is nothing more hypocritical than a Republican.
yeah, because having 1 more empty head like Elizabeth he stand up against hard facts by people who can actually put thoughts together and apply reason and logic to the conversation at hand.
so by elizabeths mindset...if you are sitting in your car at a red light and u run the red light to pull in the way of a drunk driver about to run over some school kids at a crosswalk...you should be tried on nothing but 'the law' ...yes you broke the law and thats it according to liz...rulings are made taking every determining factor into consideration...liz is typical whitebread...she has no clue as to 'real' life.
I think certain sentences are too harsh, but she is right to a certain degree. Depending on circumstances, some empathy should not be a factor in a court room. It can skew judgment.
@LadyZeppelin1960 Have you ever seen the movie 12 Angry Men? All 12 people look at the same case, even when they try to be objective, in a completely subjective way. This is why it is good to have a latina woman in the court because she will understand things that the homogeneous group of white people on the court won't.
The law isn't always as clear cut as her drunk-driving example (a logical fallacy by the way). I like knowing that a case will be viewed with different perspectives.
@murdockqotsa I know and I stated that. I was simply talking about involving too much compassion in a courtroom. Regardless of the case or the crime committed, one can skew judgment.
@LadyZeppelin1960 Yeah my point was just that the whole introduction of the concept of empathy in the courtroom, really had nothing to do with the induction of Sonia Sotomayor. Hasselbeck was over analyzing one thing she said, and basing her entire argument on it.
@ aussieguy2109, THANK YOU !!! there's afro-latinos, latinos who are latino even though the majority of their blood comes from GERMANY !!! Peru even had a JAPANESE president !! XD latinos are all types of people. elizabeth hasselback is a moron and she is kept on the view because she makes people mad and she's fun to laugh at :)
gotta love ow Elizabeth tries to sound intelligent.. She, like Sarah Palin, just love to speak for the 'american people' and yet she's not speaking for me.
so hasselbeck's argument is based on a drunk driving example? no drunk driving case will ever make it to supreme court. she needs a much stronger example to prove whatever crazy point she's trying to make
My GOD ! How does this show continue to be on the air? Hasselback is dumb, the black bitches only care to talk about anything that's Pro Black, the older white woman is a race traitor and only agrees with the black bitches so she doesn't piss them off and Barbara Walters just needs to die...
Hasslebeck just sounds so stupid sometimes...she just wants to argue the same insane bs...over and over again and thinks it will sound right.. I think deep inside her dark closet she is a racist...
@murdockqotsa People on television don't have to wear a shitload of makeup. Society makes people feel ugly and people are afraid to show their true faces to billions of people.
@LadyZeppelin1960 Well I'm not arguing that... I'm just saying that it is standard practice to wear a shitload of makeup when on tv. So it is to be expected that she'd wear a lot.
@murdockqotsa Yes. Usually light and dark people attract. It's always nice to have something different. Although, I am a little darker and my Boyfriend is Puerto Rican. I just love ethnic cultures and curves. :D
Thanks for setting the record straight because many people think of latinamericans as Latinos, I do prefer to refer about them as Hispanics because they speak the same language( Spanish) but I think your correction is pretty accurate.
My point is, in really the spanish and latin (roman) people are white races, likes celtics, germanics, slavics, jews, etc.. And is false the stereotype of these people.. this is my point.
and if someone WAS to have say over whether i get treatment or not, i would certainly prefer that it was a party that didn't have financial profit as a motivation in the decision. try thinking kid. get an education. learn how to reason things out and contemplate issues without the brainwashing that you have obviously undergone.
not everyone cares about profit. that was naive and silly. charities and other non-profit organizations, along with millions of individuals are not concerned with making a profit. looking at financial cost doesn't mean you are necessarily trying to make a profit at something. analyzing cost so that breaking even occurs happens all the time. in the case of health care, 0 profit motive should be involved. i.e. - insurance companies should be cut out, as they provide no actual care, just take $.
Lol your niave, everyone cares about profit. EVERYONE. Charities do care about profit since 50% of donations to some charities actually provide the wages of the charity staff.
charities paying salaries is not profit, you idiot. that is an operating expense. profit is money that ownership earns AFTER all expenses are paid. non-profit organizations don't pay owners or stockholders. know something before you talk about something.
and btw idiot.... 100% of donations to ALL charities provide wages of charity employees. LOL all money taken in by charities, by the very definition, is donated. what a f'n tool.
like i said earlier, my grammar and spelling on the internet account for nothing and does not make my statements anymore factually accurate. Latino's/hispanics are not a race. there are only three races caucasians, mongoloids and negroids. These are scientific terms i'm not trying to be rascist or offensive. you can say mixed race maybe the fourth classification but that is it. look it up hispanics/latinos are an ethnicity not a race.
your spelling and grammar indicated your intellect and education. you are a moron, and you have no education. your credibility is destroyed by your inadequacy.
your declaration of what races exist is purely your idiotic musing. you can't even spell racist ffs. hispanic/latino is a race, whether your dumb ass wants to acknowledge reality or not.
what education did you get? education from the ghetto? go fuck yourself i've graduated from university with a science degree and i studied some medical differences between races and guess what in the 100's of scientific papers i read 'latino's' where not a race. what kind of education did you get kindergarden?
i have two degrees from a major university... that's the education i got. you have studied jack shit kid. "differences between races"? that is a field of study? LMAO save it kid. hispanic/latino is a race dummy. get some knowledge.
kid? you fail majorly. can't you accept other peoples opinions or are you fascist? i bet you got two art degrees? both of which teach you nothing about science. Scientifically there are 3 races, white, black and asian. That is what all the medical studies agree on. Latinos are an ethnicity not a race, just like jews are a religion not a race, just like kurds are an ethnicity not a race. There is a fucking difference. Ask your family or research it.
LOL you are talking about facts, and then saying that it is an opinion. ummm no, i don't have two art degrees, you idiot. scientifically, you are a moron. you claiming that there are 3 races doesn't create reality. "learnt"???? LOLOLOLOL omg that's funny. you said "learnt" while trying to assert yourself intellectually. that is f'n hilarious.
dominican is a reference to a country, you idiot, not a race. scientifically, you don't know crap from crisco.
LOL how classic. you said "argueing" while calling someone else a moron. it is "arguing". LMAO. f'n dipshit. correcting you over and over is done to point out that you are stupid and have no credibility.
no one believes dominican is a race, crackhead. if you are from the dominican republic, your nationality is dominican. if you are from puerto rico, you are puerto rican. if you are from the usa, you are american. duh.
in the study of hematology we learnt that certain races have a higher frequency of certain blood group antigens. The asian race has a particularly high frequency of its blood being rhesus d positive, black race and people living around the malaria belt have higher incidences of the duffy antigen which has some protective function against malaria. Yes there are a difference amongst races and in all the studies i've read their has been no mention of a latino race.
Latinos are an ethnicity they can come in black, white or asian race. Just like dominican is not a race, neither is latino. dominican is a nationality, latino an ethnicity. Like someone can be an american black latino. There are black latinos, there are white latinos. I disagree on the whole use of racial classification because most people are a mix of races. However scientifically latinos are not a race.
and btw kid... i bet you don't have 2 canadian doctors in your family, & 2 nurses married to them, on one side... a grandmother and aunt as nurses, and another aunt that was the head of the american lung assocation in your state, and is currently on the county board of health. i am very well informed on my own, let alone the vast amount of information i get from people close to me that are in the very industry you try to speak about as if you know jack shit.
Canada has long waiting lines at the doctor and Canada has a lot less people in it then the US. So imagine how the wait will be in the US. Also, I have looked at various youtube posts regarding Canadian healthcare and on province has to have a lottery to to see who can win an appointment with the doctor they have been waiting three weeks for.I also don't want the government to have any control over my body. They can then decide, just like an insurance comp.who lives who dies.
you make yourself look more foolish each time you speak. THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T HAVE CONTROL OVER YOUR BODY IN CANADA, NOR WOULD IT IN THE USA. NOT BEING PROPOSED, AND ISN'T THE SLIGHTEST OF A THREAT TO YOU, ME, NOR ANYONE. LOL. fool. and if someone already has control over you, being insurance companies currently, why would it be a reason to stop reform? it already exists, so there would be no harm there... no reason to be worried. nothing would be worse.
you really are stupid. i know canada doesn'rt have control duh. I am drawing a comparison about how public healthcare doesn't work in those countries. if it doesn't work there, it won't work here. duh. Thats what we based our model off of. those countries.Go to a VA hospital (girlfriend works at one) and learn about the poor quality of the the government run service.
i am highly intelligent. 146 iq does not make for a stupid person. public healthcare DOES work in all of those countries, you moron. the usa is 37th systematically, and spends FAR MORE than any other country. your position is moronic, and indefensible. THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT TRYING TO RUN THE SERVICE, IDIOT. LOLOLOL. no one is proposing that healthcare providers be part of the VA or any other government controlled entity, you dipshit. your paranoia is based on blatant falsehoods.
An 146 IQ doesn't make for an informed person either. You can have an IQ of 250 and not no shit about history, medecine, law etcetra if you were not trained in that field. IQ just determines how fast you can solve problems, that's it.
i never said that a high IQ makes a person informed. and you obviously have a very misinformed idea of what an IQ indicates.
your GWbush remark is moronic and completely irrelevant. the people in his family knowing things doesn't eliminate his stupidity. the information he ever received at any time could be 100% accurate, and yet his inane decisions could ignore it. the information from people in my family in a field of commonality and expertise is correct, despite you not liking me.
you may be a white guy, but you certainly aren't wise, but a biased, right wing nut clown.
again, stupid, lying talking points. canada does NOT have long waiting lines any more than the USA has. there are far more doctors in the united states anyway, so that connection is completely stupid. do you ever think before you speak? and we should ration care and not allow people to get care because it would cause lines? LOL what a shock, you have no empathy.
Empathy: Let's pretend: I am a lonely man who can't get any. Im so ugly I decide the only way to ever have sex is to rape a poor innocent woman. You're telling me that judge should have empathy for me because my life was horrible? They should only give me a slap on the wrist because they had to feel sorry for me? No. Court is not a place for empathy. Unbiased also unfortunately means unempathetic. Fair is not always pleasant.
No one tries to understand a Republican. Democrats hear only what they want to. Republicans on the other hand, understand where a Democrat is coming from, and they have good intentions, but their ideas are always half baked and unrealistic. Free this, free that, rainbows, ice cream and puppies-not the real world. Democrats however, refuse to listen. Period. Can't teach a pig to sing, it embarasses you and irritates the pig. That is why no one listens to Elisabeth. And take her out of context.
"Republicans on the other hand, understand where a Democrat is coming from, and they have good intentions, but their ideas are always half baked and unrealistic"
Let me clarify, Democrats live in unreality. My statement was a little garbled.
republicans are a joke, and are far more likely to be devoid of a grasp of reality. this is evidence by your completely inane rape scenario. violent sexual acts committed are not anything remotely close to what "empathy" is about, you mindless fool. LMAO. you are so lost as to what the topic was even about when it was raised, you shouldn't have even tried to comment. court is a place for empathy. should a parent go to jail for stealing food to steal their starving children? use your head idiot
Court is not for empathy. You don't go to court to have people feel sorry for you. Your in court to get punished or get someoen else punished. The law is the law. You would sue me if I stole food from you store and you would want me to pay for it. My scenario is the exact same as your scenario. If we let empathy get in the way of common sense and respect, then anyone can argue on the basis of empathy. Having a hard life is not a free pass to break the law. Period.
the law is the law. courts determine if a person broke the law, and if so, what is the appropriate outcome. i would not sue you if you stole a loaf of bread from me. that is absurd. empathy shouldn't get in the way of common sense and respect??? empathy is PART OF common sense and respect, you f'n dinkus. LOLOLOLOL you seem to think that empathy means "allowing people to get away with anything they want." you are a dumbass. it means taking all things into consideration, not free passes.
Hasselback's arguement is that by a judge having empathy that this might leed to bias in the judgements passed by the judge. She doesn't take into account everyone is bias and corruptable. A perfect judge would not be human.
i disagree that a perfect judge would not be human. common sense discretion and reason is almost always required to make solid, just, appropriate decisions. things are rarely black and white decisions. the gray area being contemplated is what makes a person a better judge than a robot or computer could ever be. e.g. - if a robot was president of the united states in 1962, we could very well be all dead or never have been born.
everyone tries to understand a republican. and they are widely very well understood. they are greedy, self-righteous, religious, flag-waving, mindless sheep. dem's have never ever said that anything is free. you have no ability to think beyond talking points and rhetoric. "free" things in the government are paid for, not free. they are paid for by taxes. rich people should pay far more, because they can afford to pay it. you are not rich, i would wager, and have nothing to bitch about.
I have nothing to bitch about? I get angry when I see people getting free cell phones from the government. I couldn't always afford a cell phone, so I saved my money until I could have one. I WORKED for what I want. I didn't rely on handouts. So piss off a Democrat: give facts (really shuts them down), work hard, be successful.
LOL yes, the government has stations all over the country where it gives out free cell phones. what drugs are you on? facts? where do you come up with shit? FACTS? name one governmental agency that gives out free cell phones to the public. LOL and you don't understand why you are called a moron. everyone should work hard and be successful to the best of their ability. we are in agreement on something finally. you finally said something reasonable.
Flag waving? Yes we wave flags because we live in America. I realize Obama is trying very hard to weaken this country and conform to what other countries want, which is not the way to go. We are proud of where we came from. If you aren't, then leave this country. Try Zimbabwe. When it costs you 10 grand for a loaf of bread in Zimbabwe maybe you will have a little more respect for the country you were born in.
being an american in no way requires flag waving, and it is sad that people think otherwise. as if it makes you more of an american to do so. again, you are very stupid.... why would any president be trying to weaken the country? holy hell you are stupid and crazy. i am proud of where i come from, so is the president. why don't YOU leave if you don't like it? i have far more respect for my country than you do, obviously. i respect everyone in the nation as equally deserving as human beings.
why would any president be trying to weaken the country? I don't know maybe the corporations that funded his run for presidency have motives and finacial plans which might contradict what is good for the country. I.e. George Bush's war on iraq using American taxpayer money which got america into a more sever debt crisis.
as stupid and corrupt as he was, there is no reasonable foundation for an argument that bush was deliberately trying to weaken the country. doing stupid, greedy, self-serving things doesn't mean the result of weakening the country was intended. he didn't care if it weakened the country, perhaps, but that is not the same.
fucking dumb cunt Elizabeth... its almost painful to listen to her. how can you compare being drunk and driving to issues of race and discrimination? what about somebody whose loved ones were kiilled by a drunk driver, would there be any empathy there? fucking dumb bitch
she is hated because she is a moronic dolt. she is a blind, right wing dingbat. she is not hated for being white, nor a woman. that is a silly cop out.
subjective aren't we? I hate that subjective excuse. Everything is subjective unless you are reading from a textbook. It really means "I am dumb and can't come back with anything so I am going to cry subjective".
subjective? yes. stealing bread is not rape. both are crimes, but obviously have to be considered subjectively. your assertion that me pointing out what you are moronically oblivious about as merely subjectivity, which therefore means i am "crying," is comically inane. what a shock that you take a sheep stance of protecting the pathetically clueless hasseldork. i am sure you think palin would make a fantastic president. LMAO
Sheep stance? I don't see anybody else defending her. This is my opinion. I had beliefs. I didn't know what they were until one day in history at age 14, we took a political test to see which side of the aisle we were on. I was Republican. Then my beliefs had a name. I defend myself against liberal college kids everyday. So I am anything but a sheep. I dont see anyone else defending her. Everybody hates Elisabeth. People hate conservatives because they speak in terms of reality.
sheep stance, duh... means blind, right wing, flag-waving, support anyone right wing no matter what they say. you don't see anyone doing it? it is does constantly all over the country. are you that stupid, or just a liar? conservatives don't speak in terms of reality, but of greed, self-righteousness, and untenable propositions that don't take into account anyone but the rich and self righteous. you were a republican at 14 because you were taught to be by your parents.
Oh I am? My mother thinks abortion isn't such a bad idea. My mother thinks gun control is a nice thing. My mom works at a company that only does business with minority owned businesses. You don't know how I was brought up. Im more conservative than most people I know.
claims about your upbringing are merely blah blah blah. don't tell me your mother thinks this and that. and who cares where she supposedly works? would she quit if the company didn't only supposedly do business as you claim it does? you are a right wing dipshit that will support all right wing bs rhetoric, and blindly support clueless, uneducated morons like palin. you aren't wise in the slightest. your "white" claim only points out what a stupid, naive racist you are. btw, i am a white guy.
Oh and a wise Latina comment isn't racist? I love it when people start correcting my spelling, because it means they no longer can argue the point. Its great knowing the other person is running out of steam and is reduced to semantics. Wonderful feeling.
not being able to spell points out your lack of credibility via a lack of education and intelligence. no steam lacking whatsoever on my end kiddo. you making such a dismissive cop out claim is comical. wise latina comment was not racist in the slightest. you don't like her and didn't want her to be confirmed, so you say she is a racist. did she say "i will make decisions that favor latinos and latinas"??? of course not. a variety of life experiences is important on the court.
People who attack others based on their grammar clearly lack factual points in an arguement. Besides bad grammar does not mean a lack of education nor does it make his point anyless credible. I dont even know his point, im just saying your very judgemental and condescending with the use of the word 'kiddo'. I agree with you on the 'wise latina' not being rascist comment, Latin people are not a race they are an ethnicity.
actually yes, i have many factual points. pointing out a person's lack of education/intelligence, that is evident via their lack of ability to spell correctly, is a gauge by which their credibility can be measured. your musing about it is merely an ad hominem attack that lacks veracity. "your" being used by you, instead of "you're", is a fine example. latin people are a race and an ethnicity. you not liking latina/latinos being called a race doesn't make it inaccurate. btw.. racist, not rascist.
You are an idiot to think 'latinos' are a race. Latino's come in black, white and asian race. they are an ethnicity. Plus grammar or spelling doesn't make my idea any less justified.
latinos are a race, for all intents and purposes. call it what you like "hispanic", etc... it is a race. don't be an asshole. is a white person from south africa looked at an considered "african american"? please.
grammar and spelling are great indicators of the credibility of the person speaking. if you don't know your ass from plywood grammatically, you are not someone that is going to garner much respect on an intellectually level. sorry dummy.
@aussieguy2109 The US considers you are race. It is done to control everyone who is non-White. To keep us down. It is great that you think LAtinos are not a race. White , Blacks, Asiana are not a race either. Only race is human beings. So we have to deconstruct the whole sphere what race is: that there i s none. Its a lie like the tooth fairy.
I also hate that word sheep stance. Its just another catchphrase like "change" or "subjective". You liberals need to get more creative. Seriously. I seriously think I am the only one on this board defending her at all. The other hosts are liberal, the audience liberal, the tv industry liberal. Thats why Obama gets asked what he had for breakfast and Palin gets asked about a Bush doctrine which technically doesn't even exist. If you still wanna fuck with me, lets fuck then. Bring it on.
being a sheep has nothing to do with defending yourself against any college kid. it has to do with supporting anything blindly right wing and selfish. you are exactly what a sheep is. not a catch phrase at all kiddo. you not liking an accurate description doesn't make it passable for you to dismiss it as benign. you are a dumbass, as i am not a liberal. 100% independent. defense of hasseldink happens all the time. not on the show usually, unless some right wing nut is on. other righties do it.
You're right. Your not happy with anything and you argue just to argue. Independent? What is that? At least I can pick a side and defend it. Your just sitting on the fence. You argue because there is a message board and computer between you and everybody else. Using catch phrases in the media and calling me a "sheep". Im not a sheep because I have my own ideas. If I were a sheep I would say free healthcare for all, and Obama rocks. I don't.
i am very happy with many things. i argue when people say things that are invalid, stupid, or crazy. there is no need to pick a side. saying so only confirms your sheephood. defend w/e "side" you have chosen. you think wanting to fend for all people equally because it is just, is being a sheep. you don't even know why you are against healthcare reform. i argue in person constantly kiddo, you don't. do in it person in front of thousands of people, then talk.
You are undecided is what it is. Its a cop out. So you can bitch about either side. When has an idependent been elected President? Right. Keep talking.
Oh I do. I debate all the time. I did it in high school on the debate team and was pretty damn good. Oh and by the way, did I ever call you any kind of names here? Your posts are filled with stupid, idiot, dumbass. That is not the dialogue of a debate. My points are very valid. You just aren't listening. I am against healthcare reform because the system doesn't work. We don't have the money.
LOL if you were on a debate team and won, you must have been up against forrest gump. your points have no validity. then are blind, right wing, idiotic talking points and claims. calling you stupid and an idiot are apt, as they are accurate. if you don't like it, don't speak so stupidly. how can you know a system that you say doesn't have enough money doesn't work, when it doesn't exist? how could it not work? how could you know it doesn't have enough money? it doesn't exist. PROPAGANDA
you are a silly, angry, right wing zombie. an anti-choice, gun toting loon, i would wager. obama was never asked what he had for breakfast as a stance query, and palin had no clue of what "bush doctrine" meant... and yes there was a bush doctrine. at best you could only say there were a couple of them. but to not have a clue? indefensible. she is a clueless rube. a joke as a candidate for the most powerful position in the world. very irresponsible for the gop to support such a person.
There was not a Bush doctrine. He uttered a few words at a speech, but it was never "hey this is new law of the land". Charlie Gibson, like every other biased news reporter, tried to purposely throw her off with that because he knew it wasn't accurate. If people elected her Governor of Alaska then she must have done something right. Also, she reaches a lot of young people via Facebook and is one of the first political figures to successfully use alternative media in that manner. She isn't dumb.
there was a very well known bush doctrine, idiot. keep being a sheep, it is comical. she didn't know anything about it. if there clearly wasn't one, why didn't the rube say "there isn't a bush doctrine." she is a stupid right wing prop. if the 90 people in alaska vote for her, then she must have done something right??? LOL yeah, that was quite an accomplishment... doing nothing and getting 3 people to vote for you. she is very dumb, she was not the first to use facebook, which is a non-issue.
No, but my example was within the exact same context that you were arguing. Empathy. We are suppose to have empathy. No, we are not. Empathy is what criminals hope for. Swindlers pray for it. The poor woman in the wheelchair acting like she was seriously injured when your car hit her but she wasn't hopes for it. If judges based opinions on empathy we would have people getting with all kinds of stuff. Divorces too, adoptions that shouldn't happen etc.
and what a shock .. YOU DO support sarah the dolt. empathy for someone saving their family's lives is warranted. for a rapist? of course not. but you want NO empathy to exist. that is blockheaded, one track thinking. it shows a lack of intellect to not be able to consider the possibility that distinctions need to be taken into account when contemplating the validity of empathy or other discretion. we are not robots, you idiot, but complex human beings.
I think Sarah actually has the potential to be a good public official, if she communicates her ideas a little differently. After all, her book is already a bestseller and hasn't even been put on the market yet. That should tell you something. People are drawn to her. I think what happened with her was McCain made her memorize a script rather than say what she wanted to say. If its just Sarah talking from her own perspective she could unite this country. She went after her own party first in Ak.
sarah doesn't have the potential to be a good anything. she is a dolt. she can't communicate ANY ideas, because she is a clueless moron. a book she didn't even write being a best seller has no bearing on her credibility. she could unite how? by shooting moose and wolves? she never did ANYTHING, in a city as mayor, nor state as governor, with NO people to speak of. the more you speak, the more you reveal yourself as a brainwashed kid. she is a moron that can't even put a basic sentence together.
your example was asinine. you assume that no one ever deserves sympathy or empathy, that everyone is underhanded... all swindlers. what about a person that been raped? do they deserve empathy? or should they be treated exactly the same as someone that had a dollar loaf of bread stolen from them? you are a typical, closed-minded, mean, angry, compassionless asshole. a hard core, right wing minion.
In court, no empathy or sympathy. A rape victim would not be persecuted because they didn't rape. Of course the rapist is that raped is going to be put behind bars because its a crime. Duh. My point is the person in question should not have any kind of sympathy or empathy. That is what the ladies of the View are discussing. Duh.
in court, common sense empathy and sympathy should always be in effect. if no human contemplation was being employed, there would be no need for judges or juries. idiot.
elizabeth's example of the drunk driver is misleading, who's to say being an emparthetic person, the judge would not also be able to empathize with the victims in the case?
empathizing does not mean you are blind and not consider all facets of the case. Which is what they were trained to do as judges! One thing that Elizabeth clearly is not able to do and does not seem to want to.
if you look at law with out empathy you never grow as a nation... when applying "empathy" for a lack of better words... you can grow and thus can your " law"
There is a qualitative difference between a DUI case and a case that would be heard by the Supreme Court. The reason it's made it that far is because it isn't black and white, so the justices need to INTERPRET the constitution and determine whether or not the plantiff's rights were violated. As Whoopi pointed out, if it were as cut-and-dry as Elisabeth makes it out to be, we would have computers do it.
if empathy is not important in interpreting our laws and the constitution, then we can just have a computer do it. if a word doesn't literally exist in the constitution, then nothing in the law could apply. this stupid right wing zombie. people have personal experiences, no matter who they are. we aren't robots, we are all humans. a judge has to be unbiased and smart when interpreting the law no matter who they are. elisabeth is spewing right wing propaganda, as usual.
I disagree. If you want empathy cry to a friend. The law is the law. Judge Judy, who was an excellent and legitimate judge prior to her show will tell you the same thing. Your not in court for sympathy, which is why it is every citizens duty to stay out of it at all times and not break the rules!
empathy is not sympathy. you first need to learn something about english. saying someone is an excellent judge is subjective. you are very naive. you may have no control over being in court (wrongly accused) or may need to take someone to court because you were wronged. you are a dink to not consider that you might be in the legal system for countless reasons aside from "breaking the rules." what are you, 12?
Well, I Judge Judy is an excellent judge she recieved praise and all kinds of promotions and had a very successful career as a judge. Thats why shes always on talk shows etc giving her opinion whatever high profile legal case is going on at the time. You are subjective for saying I have no ability to think beyond points and rhetoric. You don't know that. I mean, I'll mop the floor with you if you want to argue. Lastly, I know people go to court for reasons other than breaking the rules.
Court is to settle disputes as well. Do you want a judge that is going to lean more towards "who really deserves to win" or "from an unemotional, unbiased standpoint, who really should win this case?" I don't want a black or hispanic judge ruling in someone else's favor because they are of the same race as he or she. I want what is fair and justified.
received, dummy, not recieved. saying that you no ability to think beyond talking points and rhetoric is based on what you say. i do know it, since there is evidence. it is not something i pulled out of the sky. i want a judge that says "who really deserves to win?" of course. that is what a judges job is, doofus. empathy doesn't equal bias. good god you are dense. who said that a judge should or does rule in favor of someone because of their race? everyone wants what is fair ffs.
You can have EMPATHY for someone's situation, and still not agree with them. I think Elizabeth is a little confused on what Empathy means. I can empathize with someone who is a drunk; however, I don't agree that they should be driving while they are drunk. I disagree that interpreting the law should be done without 'feelings'. We are human. 'Feelings' are going to be interjected into judgements regardless of whether you want them or not.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I'm Latino and pro affirmative action. But I also believe that there is such a thing as reverse discrimination and that two wrongs don't make a right.
What really bothers me though, is how Ms. Goldberg and Ms. Behar get away with modifying Judge Sotomayor's ACTUAL statement and even interrupt Ms. Hasselbeck (who I'm no fan of) when she tries to read it.
If this is what passes for progressive or liberal these days, than I QUIT!
I will not be connected to, or represented by GOOFBALLS!
Is Sotomayor related to Gaddafi?
javeav 11 months ago
Ummmmm....that lady in the orange is dumb. If she read any of the rulings on the ourt, she would see it is all personal interpetion of law. Sorry, sweetie....
batain 11 months ago
sotomayor is a blatant racist and activist judge. How the hell can anyone claim otherwise?
VegasBilgeRat 1 year ago
This woman Elisabeth) is thicker than a rock, she has no idea about the trails and tribulations of some her neighbors and I don't believe she much cares. I believe had any people in her family tree had ever gone through what others have and continue to do so, she would be singing a different tune. I agree with the Latina comment by our new Supreme Court Justice, Sonia Sotomayor and for those who don't, can get over the fact that there is a new America folks, either join or move elsewhere.
Karma2Die4 1 year ago
@Karma2Die4 The role of a supreme court judge is NOT to be sentimental and understanding. they are to have a dispassionate interpretation of original law.
Sotomayor is a member of La Raza! WTF?! She's a racist!
VegasBilgeRat 1 year ago
@VegasBilgeRat She is not a racist, when you have had only WHITE males sitting on the court and have ruled with an iron fist against those who do not look like them, then it is time to even the playing field as much as possible. I really do not care about those who seems to have a problem with her appointment, the rest of us had to endure the racist decision of this court from the time the pale faces' asses hit their chairs. Now, for those who object to her appointment, welcome to our WORLD!
Karma2Die4 1 year ago
@Karma2Die4 Your comment is filled with racism, so I'm going to interpret your rambling as "I'm a racist, and i want a racist on the supreme court who agrees with my racist garbage"
Only whites on the supreme court? I think you need to do a little research.
VegasBilgeRat 1 year ago
@Karma2Die4 point out these racist decisions in the last 4 years. Or are you asuming they made racist decisions simply because they are 'pale faces.' Im Latino(Cuban) if you were wondering.
AlizeCiz 5 months ago
@Karma2Die4 @Karma2Die4 point out these racist decisions in the last 4 years. Or are you assuming they made racist decisions simply because they are 'pale faces.' Im Latino(Cuban) if you were wondering.
AlizeCiz 5 months ago
Sherri is so dumb. How does having slaves in your family tree going to effect your interp of something?
ANTM55 1 year ago
Wow I heard Hasselbeck was thick but she wow.
emmyjo720 1 year ago
She'll be at Yankee Stadium for Opening Day as Justice emeritus,watching Justin Verlander no hit theeeee Yankees.If she doesn't rescue herself in the Jan eligibility case,she will be going,going,gone.
rentslave 1 year ago
Why is Elisabeth saying emotion shouldn't be there when interpreting the laws? When talking about the trials for the terror suspects she gets all emotional bringing up that she knew someone who died in 9/11 therefore terror suspects should have no rights at all and we should continue kidnapping and torturing people. That seems like a decision based on emotion, which apparently we aren't supposed to be doing? There is nothing more hypocritical than a Republican.
watermelonygoodness 1 year ago
yeah, because having 1 more empty head like Elizabeth he stand up against hard facts by people who can actually put thoughts together and apply reason and logic to the conversation at hand.
Dahgrostabphri 1 year ago
they need 2 conservatives not 3 liberals against 1.
dontbegoingthere 1 year ago
so by elizabeths mindset...if you are sitting in your car at a red light and u run the red light to pull in the way of a drunk driver about to run over some school kids at a crosswalk...you should be tried on nothing but 'the law' ...yes you broke the law and thats it according to liz...rulings are made taking every determining factor into consideration...liz is typical whitebread...she has no clue as to 'real' life.
skillet54 1 year ago
Elisabeth voice........just kills my insides
VaGurl88 1 year ago
Somehow, whoopi is the smartest one of the bunch.
airplaneking 1 year ago 3
I think certain sentences are too harsh, but she is right to a certain degree. Depending on circumstances, some empathy should not be a factor in a court room. It can skew judgment.
LadyZeppelin1960 1 year ago
@LadyZeppelin1960 Have you ever seen the movie 12 Angry Men? All 12 people look at the same case, even when they try to be objective, in a completely subjective way. This is why it is good to have a latina woman in the court because she will understand things that the homogeneous group of white people on the court won't.
The law isn't always as clear cut as her drunk-driving example (a logical fallacy by the way). I like knowing that a case will be viewed with different perspectives.
murdockqotsa 1 year ago
@murdockqotsa I know and I stated that. I was simply talking about involving too much compassion in a courtroom. Regardless of the case or the crime committed, one can skew judgment.
LadyZeppelin1960 1 year ago
@LadyZeppelin1960 Yeah my point was just that the whole introduction of the concept of empathy in the courtroom, really had nothing to do with the induction of Sonia Sotomayor. Hasselbeck was over analyzing one thing she said, and basing her entire argument on it.
But I agree with what you are saying.
murdockqotsa 1 year ago
@MrDustock
knockturnal405 1 year ago
@ aussieguy2109, THANK YOU !!! there's afro-latinos, latinos who are latino even though the majority of their blood comes from GERMANY !!! Peru even had a JAPANESE president !! XD latinos are all types of people. elizabeth hasselback is a moron and she is kept on the view because she makes people mad and she's fun to laugh at :)
TheSconas 1 year ago
gotta love ow Elizabeth tries to sound intelligent.. She, like Sarah Palin, just love to speak for the 'american people' and yet she's not speaking for me.
frootbat31 1 year ago
OMG these girls are so bias...... her being Latina has NOTHING to do with being a judge..........so the BLACK or WHITE judges are also bias???
Soprano4000 1 year ago
Does Hasseltard huff gas fumes while writing down talking points from Fox News?
Holy fuck she's retarded.
Her mouth moves faster than her brain "works". Garbled bullshit comes out.
TAz69x 1 year ago
I do think the Elizabeth is a closet racist. I'm sure she enjoys the attention she gives to extremist.
YourMadeCoach 1 year ago 3
so hasselbeck's argument is based on a drunk driving example? no drunk driving case will ever make it to supreme court. she needs a much stronger example to prove whatever crazy point she's trying to make
lkr1204 1 year ago
My GOD ! How does this show continue to be on the air? Hasselback is dumb, the black bitches only care to talk about anything that's Pro Black, the older white woman is a race traitor and only agrees with the black bitches so she doesn't piss them off and Barbara Walters just needs to die...
shon363 1 year ago
@shon363 - I disagree
TheIconoclasst 1 year ago
elizabeth is so dumb
diefelo1 1 year ago
Hasslebeck just sounds so stupid sometimes...she just wants to argue the same insane bs...over and over again and thinks it will sound right.. I think deep inside her dark closet she is a racist...
nn120974 1 year ago
PERSPECTIVE Ms. Hasselbeck.
So pretty...yet so dumb.
murdockqotsa 2 years ago 23
@murdockqotsa Pretty? I was thinking typical white girl looking, wearing a ton of makeup... and yes, not very intelligent.
LadyZeppelin1960 1 year ago
@LadyZeppelin1960 anyone on tv wears a shitload of makeup. Plus i kind of dig the typical white, blonde girl, so sue me.
murdockqotsa 1 year ago
@murdockqotsa People on television don't have to wear a shitload of makeup. Society makes people feel ugly and people are afraid to show their true faces to billions of people.
LadyZeppelin1960 1 year ago
@LadyZeppelin1960 Well I'm not arguing that... I'm just saying that it is standard practice to wear a shitload of makeup when on tv. So it is to be expected that she'd wear a lot.
And I still really like white, blonde girls.
murdockqotsa 1 year ago
@murdockqotsa Right on. Are you a darker skinned or haired male?
LadyZeppelin1960 1 year ago
@LadyZeppelin1960 hahaha! Yeah. Dark hair, light brown skin, dark eyes. Good guess.
murdockqotsa 1 year ago
@murdockqotsa Yes. Usually light and dark people attract. It's always nice to have something different. Although, I am a little darker and my Boyfriend is Puerto Rican. I just love ethnic cultures and curves. :D
LadyZeppelin1960 1 year ago
she isn't the first Justice of Latin decent - don't forget about Benjamin Cardozo, one of the most brilliant jurists in American history.
ieodksnw787 2 years ago
Latinos are people from Lazio, Italy. and the spanish peple are from Spain (in europe).
Latinoamericans people from Latinoamerica, this is the correct term.
Iam argentinian and i have italian and jewish blood, this is my race..
fershi11 2 years ago
Thanks for setting the record straight because many people think of latinamericans as Latinos, I do prefer to refer about them as Hispanics because they speak the same language( Spanish) but I think your correction is pretty accurate.
lachili70 2 years ago
shut up...
scarypowers 2 years ago
You have a close mind, revise the history, check it the term "latin". Latin was the langauge from the romans.
The latin languages are: spanish, french, italian, rumanian and portuguese languages.
Check it my friend, please dont have a close mind.
fershi11 2 years ago
SO WHAT, WHO CARES?
scarypowers 2 years ago
My point is, in really the spanish and latin (roman) people are white races, likes celtics, germanics, slavics, jews, etc.. And is false the stereotype of these people.. this is my point.
Greetings for you my friend, have fun!!!
fershi11 1 year ago
and if someone WAS to have say over whether i get treatment or not, i would certainly prefer that it was a party that didn't have financial profit as a motivation in the decision. try thinking kid. get an education. learn how to reason things out and contemplate issues without the brainwashing that you have obviously undergone.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Everyone cares about profit, Governments always look at the financial cost, Why else do you think pensioners and welfare cases get paid jack shit?
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
not everyone cares about profit. that was naive and silly. charities and other non-profit organizations, along with millions of individuals are not concerned with making a profit. looking at financial cost doesn't mean you are necessarily trying to make a profit at something. analyzing cost so that breaking even occurs happens all the time. in the case of health care, 0 profit motive should be involved. i.e. - insurance companies should be cut out, as they provide no actual care, just take $.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Lol your niave, everyone cares about profit. EVERYONE. Charities do care about profit since 50% of donations to some charities actually provide the wages of the charity staff.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
LOL *you're, not your *naive, not niave.
charities paying salaries is not profit, you idiot. that is an operating expense. profit is money that ownership earns AFTER all expenses are paid. non-profit organizations don't pay owners or stockholders. know something before you talk about something.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
and btw idiot.... 100% of donations to ALL charities provide wages of charity employees. LOL all money taken in by charities, by the very definition, is donated. what a f'n tool.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
like i said earlier, my grammar and spelling on the internet account for nothing and does not make my statements anymore factually accurate. Latino's/hispanics are not a race. there are only three races caucasians, mongoloids and negroids. These are scientific terms i'm not trying to be rascist or offensive. you can say mixed race maybe the fourth classification but that is it. look it up hispanics/latinos are an ethnicity not a race.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
@aussieguy2109
your spelling and grammar indicated your intellect and education. you are a moron, and you have no education. your credibility is destroyed by your inadequacy.
your declaration of what races exist is purely your idiotic musing. you can't even spell racist ffs. hispanic/latino is a race, whether your dumb ass wants to acknowledge reality or not.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
what education did you get? education from the ghetto? go fuck yourself i've graduated from university with a science degree and i studied some medical differences between races and guess what in the 100's of scientific papers i read 'latino's' where not a race. what kind of education did you get kindergarden?
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
@aussieguy2109
i have two degrees from a major university... that's the education i got. you have studied jack shit kid. "differences between races"? that is a field of study? LMAO save it kid. hispanic/latino is a race dummy. get some knowledge.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
kid? you fail majorly. can't you accept other peoples opinions or are you fascist? i bet you got two art degrees? both of which teach you nothing about science. Scientifically there are 3 races, white, black and asian. That is what all the medical studies agree on. Latinos are an ethnicity not a race, just like jews are a religion not a race, just like kurds are an ethnicity not a race. There is a fucking difference. Ask your family or research it.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
@aussieguy2109
LOL you are talking about facts, and then saying that it is an opinion. ummm no, i don't have two art degrees, you idiot. scientifically, you are a moron. you claiming that there are 3 races doesn't create reality. "learnt"???? LOLOLOLOL omg that's funny. you said "learnt" while trying to assert yourself intellectually. that is f'n hilarious.
dominican is a reference to a country, you idiot, not a race. scientifically, you don't know crap from crisco.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
there is no point argueing with a moron like you, i never said dominican was a race, but your fellow american idiots believe it is.
BTW attacking my spelling and grammar doesnt disproove my arguement asshole. btw latinos are not a race.
This is also the last time i will be replying to your idiocy.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
@aussieguy2109
LOL how classic. you said "argueing" while calling someone else a moron. it is "arguing". LMAO. f'n dipshit. correcting you over and over is done to point out that you are stupid and have no credibility.
no one believes dominican is a race, crackhead. if you are from the dominican republic, your nationality is dominican. if you are from puerto rico, you are puerto rican. if you are from the usa, you are american. duh.
you won't respond because you were crushed LMAO.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
in the study of hematology we learnt that certain races have a higher frequency of certain blood group antigens. The asian race has a particularly high frequency of its blood being rhesus d positive, black race and people living around the malaria belt have higher incidences of the duffy antigen which has some protective function against malaria. Yes there are a difference amongst races and in all the studies i've read their has been no mention of a latino race.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
Latinos are an ethnicity they can come in black, white or asian race. Just like dominican is not a race, neither is latino. dominican is a nationality, latino an ethnicity. Like someone can be an american black latino. There are black latinos, there are white latinos. I disagree on the whole use of racial classification because most people are a mix of races. However scientifically latinos are not a race.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
and btw kid... i bet you don't have 2 canadian doctors in your family, & 2 nurses married to them, on one side... a grandmother and aunt as nurses, and another aunt that was the head of the american lung assocation in your state, and is currently on the county board of health. i am very well informed on my own, let alone the vast amount of information i get from people close to me that are in the very industry you try to speak about as if you know jack shit.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
That doesn't mean shit who you have in your family. Look at george bush senior a man of intelligence and look at his son George W Bush?
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
Canada has long waiting lines at the doctor and Canada has a lot less people in it then the US. So imagine how the wait will be in the US. Also, I have looked at various youtube posts regarding Canadian healthcare and on province has to have a lottery to to see who can win an appointment with the doctor they have been waiting three weeks for.I also don't want the government to have any control over my body. They can then decide, just like an insurance comp.who lives who dies.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
you make yourself look more foolish each time you speak. THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T HAVE CONTROL OVER YOUR BODY IN CANADA, NOR WOULD IT IN THE USA. NOT BEING PROPOSED, AND ISN'T THE SLIGHTEST OF A THREAT TO YOU, ME, NOR ANYONE. LOL. fool. and if someone already has control over you, being insurance companies currently, why would it be a reason to stop reform? it already exists, so there would be no harm there... no reason to be worried. nothing would be worse.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
you really are stupid. i know canada doesn'rt have control duh. I am drawing a comparison about how public healthcare doesn't work in those countries. if it doesn't work there, it won't work here. duh. Thats what we based our model off of. those countries.Go to a VA hospital (girlfriend works at one) and learn about the poor quality of the the government run service.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
i am highly intelligent. 146 iq does not make for a stupid person. public healthcare DOES work in all of those countries, you moron. the usa is 37th systematically, and spends FAR MORE than any other country. your position is moronic, and indefensible. THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT TRYING TO RUN THE SERVICE, IDIOT. LOLOLOL. no one is proposing that healthcare providers be part of the VA or any other government controlled entity, you dipshit. your paranoia is based on blatant falsehoods.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
An 146 IQ doesn't make for an informed person either. You can have an IQ of 250 and not no shit about history, medecine, law etcetra if you were not trained in that field. IQ just determines how fast you can solve problems, that's it.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
i never said that a high IQ makes a person informed. and you obviously have a very misinformed idea of what an IQ indicates.
your GWbush remark is moronic and completely irrelevant. the people in his family knowing things doesn't eliminate his stupidity. the information he ever received at any time could be 100% accurate, and yet his inane decisions could ignore it. the information from people in my family in a field of commonality and expertise is correct, despite you not liking me.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Exactly just like your family being doctors doesn't eliminate your stupidity.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
Im just a wise white guy. It takes a wise white guy to sometimes reach conclusion other people can't.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
you may be a white guy, but you certainly aren't wise, but a biased, right wing nut clown.
again, stupid, lying talking points. canada does NOT have long waiting lines any more than the USA has. there are far more doctors in the united states anyway, so that connection is completely stupid. do you ever think before you speak? and we should ration care and not allow people to get care because it would cause lines? LOL what a shock, you have no empathy.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Comment removed
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
Empathy: Let's pretend: I am a lonely man who can't get any. Im so ugly I decide the only way to ever have sex is to rape a poor innocent woman. You're telling me that judge should have empathy for me because my life was horrible? They should only give me a slap on the wrist because they had to feel sorry for me? No. Court is not a place for empathy. Unbiased also unfortunately means unempathetic. Fair is not always pleasant.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
No one tries to understand a Republican. Democrats hear only what they want to. Republicans on the other hand, understand where a Democrat is coming from, and they have good intentions, but their ideas are always half baked and unrealistic. Free this, free that, rainbows, ice cream and puppies-not the real world. Democrats however, refuse to listen. Period. Can't teach a pig to sing, it embarasses you and irritates the pig. That is why no one listens to Elisabeth. And take her out of context.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
"Republicans on the other hand, understand where a Democrat is coming from, and they have good intentions, but their ideas are always half baked and unrealistic"
Let me clarify, Democrats live in unreality. My statement was a little garbled.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
republicans are a joke, and are far more likely to be devoid of a grasp of reality. this is evidence by your completely inane rape scenario. violent sexual acts committed are not anything remotely close to what "empathy" is about, you mindless fool. LMAO. you are so lost as to what the topic was even about when it was raised, you shouldn't have even tried to comment. court is a place for empathy. should a parent go to jail for stealing food to steal their starving children? use your head idiot
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Court is not for empathy. You don't go to court to have people feel sorry for you. Your in court to get punished or get someoen else punished. The law is the law. You would sue me if I stole food from you store and you would want me to pay for it. My scenario is the exact same as your scenario. If we let empathy get in the way of common sense and respect, then anyone can argue on the basis of empathy. Having a hard life is not a free pass to break the law. Period.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
the law is the law. courts determine if a person broke the law, and if so, what is the appropriate outcome. i would not sue you if you stole a loaf of bread from me. that is absurd. empathy shouldn't get in the way of common sense and respect??? empathy is PART OF common sense and respect, you f'n dinkus. LOLOLOLOL you seem to think that empathy means "allowing people to get away with anything they want." you are a dumbass. it means taking all things into consideration, not free passes.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Hasselback's arguement is that by a judge having empathy that this might leed to bias in the judgements passed by the judge. She doesn't take into account everyone is bias and corruptable. A perfect judge would not be human.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
i disagree that a perfect judge would not be human. common sense discretion and reason is almost always required to make solid, just, appropriate decisions. things are rarely black and white decisions. the gray area being contemplated is what makes a person a better judge than a robot or computer could ever be. e.g. - if a robot was president of the united states in 1962, we could very well be all dead or never have been born.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
everyone tries to understand a republican. and they are widely very well understood. they are greedy, self-righteous, religious, flag-waving, mindless sheep. dem's have never ever said that anything is free. you have no ability to think beyond talking points and rhetoric. "free" things in the government are paid for, not free. they are paid for by taxes. rich people should pay far more, because they can afford to pay it. you are not rich, i would wager, and have nothing to bitch about.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
I have nothing to bitch about? I get angry when I see people getting free cell phones from the government. I couldn't always afford a cell phone, so I saved my money until I could have one. I WORKED for what I want. I didn't rely on handouts. So piss off a Democrat: give facts (really shuts them down), work hard, be successful.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
LOL yes, the government has stations all over the country where it gives out free cell phones. what drugs are you on? facts? where do you come up with shit? FACTS? name one governmental agency that gives out free cell phones to the public. LOL and you don't understand why you are called a moron. everyone should work hard and be successful to the best of their ability. we are in agreement on something finally. you finally said something reasonable.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Flag waving? Yes we wave flags because we live in America. I realize Obama is trying very hard to weaken this country and conform to what other countries want, which is not the way to go. We are proud of where we came from. If you aren't, then leave this country. Try Zimbabwe. When it costs you 10 grand for a loaf of bread in Zimbabwe maybe you will have a little more respect for the country you were born in.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
being an american in no way requires flag waving, and it is sad that people think otherwise. as if it makes you more of an american to do so. again, you are very stupid.... why would any president be trying to weaken the country? holy hell you are stupid and crazy. i am proud of where i come from, so is the president. why don't YOU leave if you don't like it? i have far more respect for my country than you do, obviously. i respect everyone in the nation as equally deserving as human beings.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
why would any president be trying to weaken the country? I don't know maybe the corporations that funded his run for presidency have motives and finacial plans which might contradict what is good for the country. I.e. George Bush's war on iraq using American taxpayer money which got america into a more sever debt crisis.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
as stupid and corrupt as he was, there is no reasonable foundation for an argument that bush was deliberately trying to weaken the country. doing stupid, greedy, self-serving things doesn't mean the result of weakening the country was intended. he didn't care if it weakened the country, perhaps, but that is not the same.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
fucking dumb cunt Elizabeth... its almost painful to listen to her. how can you compare being drunk and driving to issues of race and discrimination? what about somebody whose loved ones were kiilled by a drunk driver, would there be any empathy there? fucking dumb bitch
jumar1281 2 years ago
Because she is an intelligent white woman who tells it like it is she is hated. Sad.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
she is hated because she is a moronic dolt. she is a blind, right wing dingbat. she is not hated for being white, nor a woman. that is a silly cop out.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
subjective aren't we? I hate that subjective excuse. Everything is subjective unless you are reading from a textbook. It really means "I am dumb and can't come back with anything so I am going to cry subjective".
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
subjective? yes. stealing bread is not rape. both are crimes, but obviously have to be considered subjectively. your assertion that me pointing out what you are moronically oblivious about as merely subjectivity, which therefore means i am "crying," is comically inane. what a shock that you take a sheep stance of protecting the pathetically clueless hasseldork. i am sure you think palin would make a fantastic president. LMAO
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Sheep stance? I don't see anybody else defending her. This is my opinion. I had beliefs. I didn't know what they were until one day in history at age 14, we took a political test to see which side of the aisle we were on. I was Republican. Then my beliefs had a name. I defend myself against liberal college kids everyday. So I am anything but a sheep. I dont see anyone else defending her. Everybody hates Elisabeth. People hate conservatives because they speak in terms of reality.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
sheep stance, duh... means blind, right wing, flag-waving, support anyone right wing no matter what they say. you don't see anyone doing it? it is does constantly all over the country. are you that stupid, or just a liar? conservatives don't speak in terms of reality, but of greed, self-righteousness, and untenable propositions that don't take into account anyone but the rich and self righteous. you were a republican at 14 because you were taught to be by your parents.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Oh I am? My mother thinks abortion isn't such a bad idea. My mother thinks gun control is a nice thing. My mom works at a company that only does business with minority owned businesses. You don't know how I was brought up. Im more conservative than most people I know.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
claims about your upbringing are merely blah blah blah. don't tell me your mother thinks this and that. and who cares where she supposedly works? would she quit if the company didn't only supposedly do business as you claim it does? you are a right wing dipshit that will support all right wing bs rhetoric, and blindly support clueless, uneducated morons like palin. you aren't wise in the slightest. your "white" claim only points out what a stupid, naive racist you are. btw, i am a white guy.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Oh and a wise Latina comment isn't racist? I love it when people start correcting my spelling, because it means they no longer can argue the point. Its great knowing the other person is running out of steam and is reduced to semantics. Wonderful feeling.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
not being able to spell points out your lack of credibility via a lack of education and intelligence. no steam lacking whatsoever on my end kiddo. you making such a dismissive cop out claim is comical. wise latina comment was not racist in the slightest. you don't like her and didn't want her to be confirmed, so you say she is a racist. did she say "i will make decisions that favor latinos and latinas"??? of course not. a variety of life experiences is important on the court.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
People who attack others based on their grammar clearly lack factual points in an arguement. Besides bad grammar does not mean a lack of education nor does it make his point anyless credible. I dont even know his point, im just saying your very judgemental and condescending with the use of the word 'kiddo'. I agree with you on the 'wise latina' not being rascist comment, Latin people are not a race they are an ethnicity.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago
actually yes, i have many factual points. pointing out a person's lack of education/intelligence, that is evident via their lack of ability to spell correctly, is a gauge by which their credibility can be measured. your musing about it is merely an ad hominem attack that lacks veracity. "your" being used by you, instead of "you're", is a fine example. latin people are a race and an ethnicity. you not liking latina/latinos being called a race doesn't make it inaccurate. btw.. racist, not rascist.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
You are an idiot to think 'latinos' are a race. Latino's come in black, white and asian race. they are an ethnicity. Plus grammar or spelling doesn't make my idea any less justified.
aussieguy2109 2 years ago 20
@aussieguy2109
latinos are a race, for all intents and purposes. call it what you like "hispanic", etc... it is a race. don't be an asshole. is a white person from south africa looked at an considered "african american"? please.
grammar and spelling are great indicators of the credibility of the person speaking. if you don't know your ass from plywood grammatically, you are not someone that is going to garner much respect on an intellectually level. sorry dummy.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
@aussieguy2109 That doesn't make any sense to me.
watermelonygoodness 1 year ago
@aussieguy2109 The US considers you are race. It is done to control everyone who is non-White. To keep us down. It is great that you think LAtinos are not a race. White , Blacks, Asiana are not a race either. Only race is human beings. So we have to deconstruct the whole sphere what race is: that there i s none. Its a lie like the tooth fairy.
batain 11 months ago
I also hate that word sheep stance. Its just another catchphrase like "change" or "subjective". You liberals need to get more creative. Seriously. I seriously think I am the only one on this board defending her at all. The other hosts are liberal, the audience liberal, the tv industry liberal. Thats why Obama gets asked what he had for breakfast and Palin gets asked about a Bush doctrine which technically doesn't even exist. If you still wanna fuck with me, lets fuck then. Bring it on.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
being a sheep has nothing to do with defending yourself against any college kid. it has to do with supporting anything blindly right wing and selfish. you are exactly what a sheep is. not a catch phrase at all kiddo. you not liking an accurate description doesn't make it passable for you to dismiss it as benign. you are a dumbass, as i am not a liberal. 100% independent. defense of hasseldink happens all the time. not on the show usually, unless some right wing nut is on. other righties do it.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
You're right. Your not happy with anything and you argue just to argue. Independent? What is that? At least I can pick a side and defend it. Your just sitting on the fence. You argue because there is a message board and computer between you and everybody else. Using catch phrases in the media and calling me a "sheep". Im not a sheep because I have my own ideas. If I were a sheep I would say free healthcare for all, and Obama rocks. I don't.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
you're not happy, not your.
i am very happy with many things. i argue when people say things that are invalid, stupid, or crazy. there is no need to pick a side. saying so only confirms your sheephood. defend w/e "side" you have chosen. you think wanting to fend for all people equally because it is just, is being a sheep. you don't even know why you are against healthcare reform. i argue in person constantly kiddo, you don't. do in it person in front of thousands of people, then talk.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
You are undecided is what it is. Its a cop out. So you can bitch about either side. When has an idependent been elected President? Right. Keep talking.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
Oh I do. I debate all the time. I did it in high school on the debate team and was pretty damn good. Oh and by the way, did I ever call you any kind of names here? Your posts are filled with stupid, idiot, dumbass. That is not the dialogue of a debate. My points are very valid. You just aren't listening. I am against healthcare reform because the system doesn't work. We don't have the money.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
LOL if you were on a debate team and won, you must have been up against forrest gump. your points have no validity. then are blind, right wing, idiotic talking points and claims. calling you stupid and an idiot are apt, as they are accurate. if you don't like it, don't speak so stupidly. how can you know a system that you say doesn't have enough money doesn't work, when it doesn't exist? how could it not work? how could you know it doesn't have enough money? it doesn't exist. PROPAGANDA
slyjokerg 2 years ago
you are a silly, angry, right wing zombie. an anti-choice, gun toting loon, i would wager. obama was never asked what he had for breakfast as a stance query, and palin had no clue of what "bush doctrine" meant... and yes there was a bush doctrine. at best you could only say there were a couple of them. but to not have a clue? indefensible. she is a clueless rube. a joke as a candidate for the most powerful position in the world. very irresponsible for the gop to support such a person.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
There was not a Bush doctrine. He uttered a few words at a speech, but it was never "hey this is new law of the land". Charlie Gibson, like every other biased news reporter, tried to purposely throw her off with that because he knew it wasn't accurate. If people elected her Governor of Alaska then she must have done something right. Also, she reaches a lot of young people via Facebook and is one of the first political figures to successfully use alternative media in that manner. She isn't dumb.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
there was a very well known bush doctrine, idiot. keep being a sheep, it is comical. she didn't know anything about it. if there clearly wasn't one, why didn't the rube say "there isn't a bush doctrine." she is a stupid right wing prop. if the 90 people in alaska vote for her, then she must have done something right??? LOL yeah, that was quite an accomplishment... doing nothing and getting 3 people to vote for you. she is very dumb, she was not the first to use facebook, which is a non-issue.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
No, but my example was within the exact same context that you were arguing. Empathy. We are suppose to have empathy. No, we are not. Empathy is what criminals hope for. Swindlers pray for it. The poor woman in the wheelchair acting like she was seriously injured when your car hit her but she wasn't hopes for it. If judges based opinions on empathy we would have people getting with all kinds of stuff. Divorces too, adoptions that shouldn't happen etc.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
and what a shock .. YOU DO support sarah the dolt. empathy for someone saving their family's lives is warranted. for a rapist? of course not. but you want NO empathy to exist. that is blockheaded, one track thinking. it shows a lack of intellect to not be able to consider the possibility that distinctions need to be taken into account when contemplating the validity of empathy or other discretion. we are not robots, you idiot, but complex human beings.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
I think Sarah actually has the potential to be a good public official, if she communicates her ideas a little differently. After all, her book is already a bestseller and hasn't even been put on the market yet. That should tell you something. People are drawn to her. I think what happened with her was McCain made her memorize a script rather than say what she wanted to say. If its just Sarah talking from her own perspective she could unite this country. She went after her own party first in Ak.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
sarah doesn't have the potential to be a good anything. she is a dolt. she can't communicate ANY ideas, because she is a clueless moron. a book she didn't even write being a best seller has no bearing on her credibility. she could unite how? by shooting moose and wolves? she never did ANYTHING, in a city as mayor, nor state as governor, with NO people to speak of. the more you speak, the more you reveal yourself as a brainwashed kid. she is a moron that can't even put a basic sentence together.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
your example was asinine. you assume that no one ever deserves sympathy or empathy, that everyone is underhanded... all swindlers. what about a person that been raped? do they deserve empathy? or should they be treated exactly the same as someone that had a dollar loaf of bread stolen from them? you are a typical, closed-minded, mean, angry, compassionless asshole. a hard core, right wing minion.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
In court, no empathy or sympathy. A rape victim would not be persecuted because they didn't rape. Of course the rapist is that raped is going to be put behind bars because its a crime. Duh. My point is the person in question should not have any kind of sympathy or empathy. That is what the ladies of the View are discussing. Duh.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
in court, common sense empathy and sympathy should always be in effect. if no human contemplation was being employed, there would be no need for judges or juries. idiot.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
What? She should do her job the right way? NO! That's crazy! She should just do what she wants! If you think I'm wrong, you're right.
RoastedToad 2 years ago
elizabeth's example of the drunk driver is misleading, who's to say being an emparthetic person, the judge would not also be able to empathize with the victims in the case?
empathizing does not mean you are blind and not consider all facets of the case. Which is what they were trained to do as judges! One thing that Elizabeth clearly is not able to do and does not seem to want to.
cdcotr 2 years ago
if you look at law with out empathy you never grow as a nation... when applying "empathy" for a lack of better words... you can grow and thus can your " law"
tranqillo 2 years ago
I'm dissappointed they didn't get her whole quote--Whoopi's usually better at that.
MaryJesusJoseph 2 years ago
There is a qualitative difference between a DUI case and a case that would be heard by the Supreme Court. The reason it's made it that far is because it isn't black and white, so the justices need to INTERPRET the constitution and determine whether or not the plantiff's rights were violated. As Whoopi pointed out, if it were as cut-and-dry as Elisabeth makes it out to be, we would have computers do it.
moviemania8797 2 years ago 5
if empathy is not important in interpreting our laws and the constitution, then we can just have a computer do it. if a word doesn't literally exist in the constitution, then nothing in the law could apply. this stupid right wing zombie. people have personal experiences, no matter who they are. we aren't robots, we are all humans. a judge has to be unbiased and smart when interpreting the law no matter who they are. elisabeth is spewing right wing propaganda, as usual.
slyjokerg 2 years ago 7
Well Said!
manicoco18 2 years ago
I disagree. If you want empathy cry to a friend. The law is the law. Judge Judy, who was an excellent and legitimate judge prior to her show will tell you the same thing. Your not in court for sympathy, which is why it is every citizens duty to stay out of it at all times and not break the rules!
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
empathy is not sympathy. you first need to learn something about english. saying someone is an excellent judge is subjective. you are very naive. you may have no control over being in court (wrongly accused) or may need to take someone to court because you were wronged. you are a dink to not consider that you might be in the legal system for countless reasons aside from "breaking the rules." what are you, 12?
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Well, I Judge Judy is an excellent judge she recieved praise and all kinds of promotions and had a very successful career as a judge. Thats why shes always on talk shows etc giving her opinion whatever high profile legal case is going on at the time. You are subjective for saying I have no ability to think beyond points and rhetoric. You don't know that. I mean, I'll mop the floor with you if you want to argue. Lastly, I know people go to court for reasons other than breaking the rules.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
Court is to settle disputes as well. Do you want a judge that is going to lean more towards "who really deserves to win" or "from an unemotional, unbiased standpoint, who really should win this case?" I don't want a black or hispanic judge ruling in someone else's favor because they are of the same race as he or she. I want what is fair and justified.
itsjustme2919 2 years ago
received, dummy, not recieved. saying that you no ability to think beyond talking points and rhetoric is based on what you say. i do know it, since there is evidence. it is not something i pulled out of the sky. i want a judge that says "who really deserves to win?" of course. that is what a judges job is, doofus. empathy doesn't equal bias. good god you are dense. who said that a judge should or does rule in favor of someone because of their race? everyone wants what is fair ffs.
slyjokerg 2 years ago
Hasselbeck's argument seems that argues that women won't make good politicians because we have empathy.
fight4acause 2 years ago 9
WISE Latinas! I love them! Elizabeth have some empathy...Joy you rock!
neptoon07 2 years ago 6
You can have EMPATHY for someone's situation, and still not agree with them. I think Elizabeth is a little confused on what Empathy means. I can empathize with someone who is a drunk; however, I don't agree that they should be driving while they are drunk. I disagree that interpreting the law should be done without 'feelings'. We are human. 'Feelings' are going to be interjected into judgements regardless of whether you want them or not.
Onyx365 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm Latino and pro affirmative action. But I also believe that there is such a thing as reverse discrimination and that two wrongs don't make a right.
What really bothers me though, is how Ms. Goldberg and Ms. Behar get away with modifying Judge Sotomayor's ACTUAL statement and even interrupt Ms. Hasselbeck (who I'm no fan of) when she tries to read it.
If this is what passes for progressive or liberal these days, than I QUIT!
I will not be connected to, or represented by GOOFBALLS!
yjuana 2 years ago
go joy!
frenchmansgirl 2 years ago 3
lol.. elizabeth is annoying
Atitoinnyc 2 years ago 6
Wow Elizabeth almost makes sense.....
youwashmeka123 2 years ago