@hgortermarof 9 seconds is certainly not bad but faster then a Golf GTI ???? The Golf GTI has 6.9 seconds from 0-100 km / h and a top speed of over 240km/h....and do not forget the 500 had since only 40 km...I think with time it gets faster...10 seconds is not bad for a small 0.9
I usually don't like displacements under 1.6, but this 2-cylinder 0.9 is very interesting, low consumption and very good performance, and sounds like old 0.5 and 0.65 of 500 and 126, great ! ! !
You fuck the car.It has only 40 km and u ruin it with the stupid accelerations. Guys i can say that if u know how to drive u can reach a consumption of 4.5-5.3 lt/100 km.
@MrEllinaras Why the fuck do you care? Seriously. Why? Is it your car? I will never understand why people go around bitching at people for beating on cars. It's not like this is a living breathing person who is getting abused, it's a fucking car, a car you have no connection with whatsoever and a car that shouldn't matter to you at all. Stop being a fucking douchebag. Who cares about some random car somewhere on planet earth? I just don't get you weirdos.
no ..it's not 1.4 or 1.2 it's the 0.9l 2 cylinder turbo engine which actually ended in mega shit regarding fuel consuption I don't know what the hell Fiat were thinking when they tested this ..or maybe they tested it only downhill ..but the car burns about 7-10 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers. So, congrats to Fiat for this big failure..:))))
Woooow se prendo una smart e ci metto il motore de sta cinquecento scommetto pure che da 0 a 100 ci mette di meno....
alexxxxxax 5 months ago
that is very slow I had a Renault Clio 1.4 rn with the famous energy engine which used also 4 litres on 100 km at just below 60mph or 80 - 90 km/h
the clio can do 200 km/h and 0-60 in 9 seconds so that is quick
it is faster then a golf gti and keeps up with a polo gti so that was fun there
by the way I lightened the car a bit so less weight and also bosch super 4 spark plugs and k&n open filter thats all
hgortermarof 8 months ago
@hgortermarof 9 seconds is certainly not bad but faster then a Golf GTI ???? The Golf GTI has 6.9 seconds from 0-100 km / h and a top speed of over 240km/h....and do not forget the 500 had since only 40 km...I think with time it gets faster...10 seconds is not bad for a small 0.9
gtfrak81 8 months ago 12
reminds me of my 0.7 '95
UnsatisfactionGuaran 9 months ago
I usually don't like displacements under 1.6, but this 2-cylinder 0.9 is very interesting, low consumption and very good performance, and sounds like old 0.5 and 0.65 of 500 and 126, great ! ! !
TheAXL35784 11 months ago
almost sounds like a Trabi when you're accelerating. Still, a very nice performance from a 2 cyl engine
zubagvatic 11 months ago
You fuck the car.It has only 40 km and u ruin it with the stupid accelerations. Guys i can say that if u know how to drive u can reach a consumption of 4.5-5.3 lt/100 km.
MrEllinaras 11 months ago
@MrEllinaras that was a specifically press vehicle...It was already ruined from the others....
gtfrak81 9 months ago 5
@MrEllinaras Why the fuck do you care? Seriously. Why? Is it your car? I will never understand why people go around bitching at people for beating on cars. It's not like this is a living breathing person who is getting abused, it's a fucking car, a car you have no connection with whatsoever and a car that shouldn't matter to you at all. Stop being a fucking douchebag. Who cares about some random car somewhere on planet earth? I just don't get you weirdos.
xilix 8 months ago 2
If you drive it carefully in the city with eco mode how much will it consume?
MrEllinaras 1 year ago
no ..it's not 1.4 or 1.2 it's the 0.9l 2 cylinder turbo engine which actually ended in mega shit regarding fuel consuption I don't know what the hell Fiat were thinking when they tested this ..or maybe they tested it only downhill ..but the car burns about 7-10 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers. So, congrats to Fiat for this big failure..:))))
tija5 1 year ago
Sounds like 126 :) Is it shaking just like 126 ? :D
szawii 1 year ago
very good for the engine do that with only 40 km u.u
ggtontoyono 1 year ago
luftkekühlt wäre besser, sollte schon mit kühlrippen versehen werden,dann hat der ein richtig geilen sound
VivaPlusBroadcast 1 year ago
nice little put-put noise at idle
ging93 1 year ago
It sounded like 0,65L with 126p hahaha
ir3n3usz 1 year ago 16
@ir3n3usz maybe.. one of the best engine ever made..
Liboni85 1 year ago
Beautiful sound , just like Honda rebel 250 . 360Deg crank inline 2 .
gengnepal 1 year ago
The little two banger intrigues me. It's a pity they aren't bringing it to the States
1fornone 1 year ago
9L/100km ???????????????
koukoudaman 1 year ago 9
@koukoudaman Ofcourse, any car have two (or even more) times bigger cons. if you drive style "pedal to the metal" ;-)
ELThomaso69 1 year ago
@koukoudaman Jep
gtfrak81 1 year ago
@koukoudaman I can get 16L/100km with my honda insight if i want...
morindom 1 year ago
@koukoudaman 4L/100KM approximately, I have got one of them.
sippymoreno 10 months ago
it's looks like the 1.4 and it's have the same torque! very good! i love downsizing
mirkinoPDL 1 year ago
@mirkinoPDL :-)))
gtfrak81 1 year ago
@mirkinoPDL but then again id rather take the golf with the 1.4 TSI with 160 or 170hp.
tomsailas 11 months ago
do you mind if i ask how long it took you to do 0-100km/h, if you know?
its cos this 2 cylinder unit is supposed to generate 23% more power than the 1.2 litre
JIMBOBERS333 1 year ago
@JIMBOBERS333 0-100km/h in ca 10 Seconds .....I think the 2 Cyl. engine is much better than the 1.2 . . . . thanks to the turbo :-)
gtfrak81 1 year ago