Added: 3 years ago
From: Uzumaki82
Views: 2,358
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Richard Dawkins the biggest scientific conman in history. Knows nothing about astrology and physics but pretends to know about humans. Dawkins stick to Darwin and leave astrology alone with your crackpot pseudo - views.

  • @TheLogic1010 I sense a troll here. But to feed you, I have to reply to your comment. Astrology is nothing but pseudo-science and yes it is for crackpots, but are you claiming the man who is a scientist in the field of biology, knows NOTHING about humans? How far fetched claim is that? A conman, seriously? Riiiiiiight....

    Where you conceived just yesterday?

    Well, to my view he is just tackling the issue of supernatural created by people in their minds and being contageously spread among others

  • @1iLLnoize1 Tell me how have you evaluated astrology and determined its validity? Really if I was concieved yesterday? Do you want a mature discussion or are you a child? Either grow up and chat constructively or go and play with toys.

  • People are constantly looking for something to believe in... The most appealing things are religion, astrology, and a sense of self-righteousness(could be interpreted as atheism.) This is not gonna change ANY TIME soon....case closed.

  • An excellent comment from Buyyourselfabookor3

    How ironic that an atheist is also refuting astrology.

    All matter/existence is energy. All existence is one. The magnetism (energy) of a planet 7 times the size of ours does have an affect on the universe. It is the intergalactic butterfly effect, if you will. People like Richard Dawkins are paid in order to turn people away from things that make sense.  Why do you think he a Fellow of the Royal Society? Enemies of Reason? How ironic.

  • @the0fart0machine

    u got it totally wrong. u have to remember that he is not refuting ASTRONOMY, but ASTROLOGY. if u think I hope, u ll get d answer. u mentioned about butterfly effect. as per butterfly effect and chaos theory u cant predict anything in complete future, right!!! bcoz u can nvr know d full set of initial conditions. then how come these astrologers predict what cud happen in a person's future, jus wid name, place and DOB. they r jus smart guesses based on past experience. thats it

  • Hehe, creatard sock-puppets here...

  • Debunking Evolution. Evolution is a primative belief system that is promoted by the dim Dawkins. In the 21st century its unbelievable that people still believe in this false and dangerous religion. A pseudoscience that has outlasted its sell by date. He arrogantly parades around the globe threatening, lieing, bullying anyone who shall offend his beloved evolution.

  • @the0fart0machine Debunking debunkers. Hows your tinfoil hat doing today ? Problem ? :D

  • Many errors in this video. Doesnt mention Indian Astrology which is 20,000 years old and uses sidereal zodiac which hasnt changed in 20,000 years.

    Also doesnt mention that Isaac Newton was an astrologer and used lunar/planetary cycles to predict weather and seismic activity. Newton predicted when London earthquakes would occur 27 years after his death.

    Dawkins is ignorant.

  • ah well, i'm an atheist but I read the astrology section just for the heck of it :P

  • People like Richard Dawkins are paid for teaching Biology in the most prestigeous universities in the world and for writing best selling books.

    Do humanity a favor and keep your stupid opinions to yourself. Knowing a few big, scientific sounding words, doesn't make you smart. You know nothing about magnetism, about energy, Physics, Astronomy, or apparently reason. Either go learn some basic science and try to intelligently refute something or keep your astounding ignorance to yourself.

  • @hobodoctor

    u also do not know nothing abt d things u have mentioned except their names. His were not stupid opinions, but yours. Astrology is a complete bullshit. U can nvr predict future or characteristics of person based on his name, place and DOB, even if d motion of planets affect him/her life. if u chaos theory u wont talk this rubbish. u r not qualified enough to criticize Dr.Dawkins, jus bcoz watever he says hurts ur damn feelings. u r a complete assh*le.

  • @kesav1985 Hi, seems we have a misunderstanding here. My comment was a response to "BuyYourselfABookor3" and their profoundly ludicrous and uneducated statement. It was made in defense of Dawkins, a man who I've paid over $400 of my minimum wage salary to see speak at a skeptic's convention in July, not as an attack on his character or credibility.

  • @hobodoctor

    fine. then. actually ur comments are not in a way to defend Dr.Dawkins, but more in an abusing manner. dats y I had to say wat I did.

  • @hobodoctor lol 13 idiots thumbed this up? Just wonderful

  • @devonkeim If I was wrong, please correct me; otherwise keep your obtusely written passive aggression to yourself.

  • lol so true

  • Where is the rest of it?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more