this kit sucks dont get it. there is no rr reg so its so lean when your on boost and melts the piston. (happened to my 07 750 with this kit) only way this kit will work is to drop your comp to under 10 and get a rr fule reg and a scav oil pump. after that the bike will be a rocket
no bike will out run another bike its the rider i had an 07 gsxr 600 with bolt ons exhaust pc3 dyno tune and -1 front sprocket kn air filter i could out run 1000s and bigger bike all day long cause i knew how to launch 10.6 1/4 on stock wheelbase that run clutchs were gone little more than half way down the track you do the math prolly would have been a 10.4 run well with 1000s 1/4 mile above average rider times so its not the power of the bike its the rider skill
sorry but your gsxr was only putting out 99 hp stock??? is that the wheel figure? my 06 gsxr600 was putting out 117 hp stock.... summit not right with ya figures chap
Turbo'd bikes are cool no matter how big or small, but what i cant understand is how a 600 turbo with roughly 120 - 130 hp eat a 1000 with 150 - 160 hp and the same amount of torque. I know the 600 is lighter but only a couple of kilos lighter.
lol actually you have your numbers off. see those horsepower specs your hearing, are over estimated company specs which are at the engine, his are more spot on rear wheel(which is what matters)
Actually no, I know they're at the engine, I should of added BHP, but yeah, they are between 118-123 BHP, somewhere around 106 RWHP I saw. Which isn't bad considering 600's were barely at 100 BHP just a few years ago.
That can't be right. The zx10r makes 83 ft-lbs of torque... with revs to about 12k, its quite a bit more than 150hp (at the crankshaft). it might be 150ish at the wheel, but that's a different story.
well in connection with this video, your looking at is a 600cc turbo rear wheel horsepower which is 124.95, then you look at say the zx10r, at a bit over 150 horse power at the rear wheel(and yes RWHP is what i use) then you consider the weight difference and gearing difference, plus the face that the 600 can rev much higher and faster you have a bike that will out accelerate a 1000, just wont top end with it...
A 600 doesn't make anymore horsepower after 11,000 rpm, and the weight difference is about 20 pounds tops, if that. With equal weight and skilled riders, 600's won't out accelerate a 1,000. That's just common sense.
okay take into account that it is turbo charged that changes the horsepower issue, but it doesnt matter that it makes namyore power after 11k, it can still rev higher which in turn allows the rear wheel to spin faster. but common since should dictate that a turbo charged 600 will out run a stock 1000 till the top end, which on the 600 will be around 160, and 186 or so on the 1000
I'm not talking about the 600 in this video, I'm talking about stock vs. stock. Do you realize after revving past 11,000 RPM, the piston will barely be able to compress the air and fuel, and start pre-igniting. I would normally take into consideration that I very well may be wrong, but seeing that you can't even spell common sense, I pretty much know you're rambling to make yourself feel better. Or some odd reason, who knows.
Okay, so what your saying is that stock versus stock, a 600 wont keep up with a 1000...well aren't you captain obvious. You might as well pit a corolla against a corvette.
No, you pay attention, you've been saying a lower geared 600 would be able to beat a 1,000 to it's top speed, which is pointless anyway. Of course the lower geared one will reach it's top speed first. Makes no sense, like what is the point of even saying that?
...omg...you are retarted look back at all my comments, i've been saying that the 600 is lower geared from the factory which is why it tops out around 160, but stock versus stock the 1000 would smoke it to 160 easy, but you put a turbo on the 600 then the combination of lower gearing, higher RPM limit and lighter weight means that the 600 will beat the 1000 to 160, but you change the gearing to where the 600 will top out around the same as the 1000, and the 1000 will beat it.
Exactly as I expected, from a pathetic kid who can barely manage to put a sentence together.
You're embarrassed that I mentioned your attempt at trolling, on nearly year old comments. I'm telling you, it was probably a typing mistake, those occure from time to time.
In all honesty, I'm not as stupid as you. I'm aware that they create power very high up in the RPM range.
They're not the same comments over and over. I mentioned 11,000 RPM only twice. I must've gotten my specs from a bad source, or not thinking at the moment. If you weren't such a fucktard, and could comprehend how Youtube works it's comments, you'd realize that they are all typically listed twice.
In the time line of the replies, and the dates of all the overall comments.
Either way, it was over a year ago. If anyone's the mistake, you are. Mr. self righreous, because you read stuff, LOL.
Sorry fucktard, you're actually right. Seeing as these comments are almost a year old now, and you're pathetic enough to start arguments based off of them. I'm not sure if I typed an incorrect number, or had false information.
As for your last comment, who are you talking to? If you go back and read my comments, you'll clearly see that I'm saying a 600 will NOT out run a liter bike.
I highly doubt you know what Horsepower is, or how it is calculated. You can hardly manage to type.
u r the definition of an idiot... who the fuck cares about the rev limit? its not gonna be faster because the rev limt is higher... do you even know what horsepower is? obviosly not... shut your fuckin face because there is no way a 600 makin 125 hp is going to out run a litre bike or any distance.... just stfu before you make any more embarrassing comments
so pretty much what you're saying u fuckin reatard is that a turbo 600 which is making around gsxr 750 power is gonna outrun a gsxr 1000.... wtf is wrong with ur head?
btw... i own a k7gsxr600... love the bike and don't thnk any other 600 out there would suit me any better... all my buddies that own dif 600's love it to after they rode it, but there is no fucking way that adding even a 30 hp boost is gonna get it to outrun a gsxr 1000 for any distance... it doesn't matter if the 600 revs higher retard... its still down almost 30hp... keep dreamin
lighter weight, different gearing and a higher red line, but int the top end with stock gearing a 1000 would take it becuase with stock gearing that thing is still only gonna hit about 160, with higher gearing the bike doesnt have the power to pull on a 1000. so basicly 130 horse power with lower gearing is better accelerating then 150 with slightly higher.
watsup kid its mike the owner of that 600..bikes sick smokes a lil like u said but im workn on that..bike kills 1000s like it nothin...no better feeling then haven the gas tank slam into your chest as u shift pass a 1000 at 120mph..
I love it, all these tools bagging out turbo 600's cause they get minimal HP gains. Lets see one of them ride a stocker to 90-95% of its true potential and then see if they want to try one with an extra 25 hp and the extra difficulty that comes with a turbo. Wankers. Nice bike BTW.
Well thank you for commenting on my video that was made over a year ago and I'm sure that everyone here knows that if you want to make big numbers from a turbo 600 (which is a badass ride) you need something other than a stock motor.
Anywho, I need to stick to my new years promise and not give haters the time of day...they never have anything intelligent to add to anything, and when they try, they are always wrong.
Slowboy busts out another Turbo 600...nice job boys. I turbo'd my 02 600 when you guys were doing your 03.
I made 121WHP @ 11,000RPM and 62TQ @ 8000RPM with 6 PSI. Not bad Torque for a little 600cc. I just put a low Compression 03 1000 motor in the 600 frame and am building a new turbo setup for that combination.
All that money and time just to get only 124hp ??? Damn bro I have more than that stock on my 750 HAHAHHAHAHAHA If you wanted to go faster you should of bought a 1K and then boost that ..
this kit sucks dont get it. there is no rr reg so its so lean when your on boost and melts the piston. (happened to my 07 750 with this kit) only way this kit will work is to drop your comp to under 10 and get a rr fule reg and a scav oil pump. after that the bike will be a rocket
kkeith15getz 1 year ago
no bike will out run another bike its the rider i had an 07 gsxr 600 with bolt ons exhaust pc3 dyno tune and -1 front sprocket kn air filter i could out run 1000s and bigger bike all day long cause i knew how to launch 10.6 1/4 on stock wheelbase that run clutchs were gone little more than half way down the track you do the math prolly would have been a 10.4 run well with 1000s 1/4 mile above average rider times so its not the power of the bike its the rider skill
slyd3v1l 1 year ago
First of all does this kit work with stock internals and at what boost level was this bike dyno at.
adamryanclark 1 year ago
sorry but your gsxr was only putting out 99 hp stock??? is that the wheel figure? my 06 gsxr600 was putting out 117 hp stock.... summit not right with ya figures chap
vicsang1 1 year ago
Y is stock whp so low? Since they have 125hp @ crank, i figured it'd be around 110whp...
GOBbluthagain 2 years ago
@GOBbluthagain well dynos vary so it might read 110 stock on a different dyno, just depends what type of dyno
mindfuckerification 7 months ago
Fuck Slowboy Racing! It took them over a month to fix the fuel injector leak on my STI and tune it. And the tune was horribly fucked up.
o3clipsegts 2 years ago
Lol yeah, stuff like that comes down to rider skills, and how quick someone is on the clutch. Not really proving anything/
kcole939 2 years ago
and higher redline
deddabouji 3 years ago
Turbo'd bikes are cool no matter how big or small, but what i cant understand is how a 600 turbo with roughly 120 - 130 hp eat a 1000 with 150 - 160 hp and the same amount of torque. I know the 600 is lighter but only a couple of kilos lighter.
Perdi83 3 years ago
a turbo 600cc would be a lot more than 120 hp. theyre pushing over 100 stock... and 1k's are at about 190 bhp now too
JeffroGymnast 3 years ago
They're actually more than 120 hp stock now, that guy's got his horsepower numbers way off. Lol.
kcole939 3 years ago
lol actually you have your numbers off. see those horsepower specs your hearing, are over estimated company specs which are at the engine, his are more spot on rear wheel(which is what matters)
PhilG88 2 years ago
Actually no, I know they're at the engine, I should of added BHP, but yeah, they are between 118-123 BHP, somewhere around 106 RWHP I saw. Which isn't bad considering 600's were barely at 100 BHP just a few years ago.
kcole939 2 years ago
yes, the 600 class technology has advanced quite a bit in the past 5 years or so.
PhilG88 2 years ago
really cause the new zx10r has the highest power out put of the 1000's right now and its only 151horses.
PhilG88 2 years ago
That can't be right. The zx10r makes 83 ft-lbs of torque... with revs to about 12k, its quite a bit more than 150hp (at the crankshaft). it might be 150ish at the wheel, but that's a different story.
JeffroGymnast 2 years ago
well in connection with this video, your looking at is a 600cc turbo rear wheel horsepower which is 124.95, then you look at say the zx10r, at a bit over 150 horse power at the rear wheel(and yes RWHP is what i use) then you consider the weight difference and gearing difference, plus the face that the 600 can rev much higher and faster you have a bike that will out accelerate a 1000, just wont top end with it...
PhilG88 2 years ago
A 600 doesn't make anymore horsepower after 11,000 rpm, and the weight difference is about 20 pounds tops, if that. With equal weight and skilled riders, 600's won't out accelerate a 1,000. That's just common sense.
kcole939 2 years ago
okay take into account that it is turbo charged that changes the horsepower issue, but it doesnt matter that it makes namyore power after 11k, it can still rev higher which in turn allows the rear wheel to spin faster. but common since should dictate that a turbo charged 600 will out run a stock 1000 till the top end, which on the 600 will be around 160, and 186 or so on the 1000
PhilG88 2 years ago
Agreed, Phil.
a properly tuned 600 would have huge amounts of torque down low as well.
JeffroGymnast 2 years ago
I'm not talking about the 600 in this video, I'm talking about stock vs. stock. Do you realize after revving past 11,000 RPM, the piston will barely be able to compress the air and fuel, and start pre-igniting. I would normally take into consideration that I very well may be wrong, but seeing that you can't even spell common sense, I pretty much know you're rambling to make yourself feel better. Or some odd reason, who knows.
kcole939 2 years ago
Okay, so what your saying is that stock versus stock, a 600 wont keep up with a 1000...well aren't you captain obvious. You might as well pit a corolla against a corvette.
PhilG88 2 years ago
Dude, you've been saying 600's will keep up with 1,000's, at least make some sense.
kcole939 2 years ago
pay attention, ive been saying a turboed 600 will keep up with a 1000 till the 600 tops out
PhilG88 2 years ago
No, you pay attention, you've been saying a lower geared 600 would be able to beat a 1,000 to it's top speed, which is pointless anyway. Of course the lower geared one will reach it's top speed first. Makes no sense, like what is the point of even saying that?
kcole939 2 years ago
...omg...you are retarted look back at all my comments, i've been saying that the 600 is lower geared from the factory which is why it tops out around 160, but stock versus stock the 1000 would smoke it to 160 easy, but you put a turbo on the 600 then the combination of lower gearing, higher RPM limit and lighter weight means that the 600 will beat the 1000 to 160, but you change the gearing to where the 600 will top out around the same as the 1000, and the 1000 will beat it.
PhilG88 2 years ago
Well no, really? You're an idiot, you need to learn how to form correct sentences, to get the point of what you're rambling on about, through.
kcole939 2 years ago
lol... ur so fuckin stupid... 600's don't make any power till they're over 10000rpm.... shut ur face and stop making a fool of urself
wtzbismarck 2 years ago
Exactly as I expected, from a pathetic kid who can barely manage to put a sentence together.
You're embarrassed that I mentioned your attempt at trolling, on nearly year old comments. I'm telling you, it was probably a typing mistake, those occure from time to time.
In all honesty, I'm not as stupid as you. I'm aware that they create power very high up in the RPM range.
kcole939 2 years ago
oh ok... that's why you make the same comments over and over and over again right buddy? because you made a typing mistake... i bet you're a mistake
wtzbismarck 2 years ago
They're not the same comments over and over. I mentioned 11,000 RPM only twice. I must've gotten my specs from a bad source, or not thinking at the moment. If you weren't such a fucktard, and could comprehend how Youtube works it's comments, you'd realize that they are all typically listed twice.
In the time line of the replies, and the dates of all the overall comments.
Either way, it was over a year ago. If anyone's the mistake, you are. Mr. self righreous, because you read stuff, LOL.
kcole939 2 years ago
actually every 600 makes its peak hp above 11000 rpm you fucktard
wtzbismarck 2 years ago
Sorry fucktard, you're actually right. Seeing as these comments are almost a year old now, and you're pathetic enough to start arguments based off of them. I'm not sure if I typed an incorrect number, or had false information.
As for your last comment, who are you talking to? If you go back and read my comments, you'll clearly see that I'm saying a 600 will NOT out run a liter bike.
I highly doubt you know what Horsepower is, or how it is calculated. You can hardly manage to type.
kcole939 2 years ago
u r the definition of an idiot... who the fuck cares about the rev limit? its not gonna be faster because the rev limt is higher... do you even know what horsepower is? obviosly not... shut your fuckin face because there is no way a 600 makin 125 hp is going to out run a litre bike or any distance.... just stfu before you make any more embarrassing comments
wtzbismarck 2 years ago
so pretty much what you're saying u fuckin reatard is that a turbo 600 which is making around gsxr 750 power is gonna outrun a gsxr 1000.... wtf is wrong with ur head?
wtzbismarck 2 years ago
btw... i own a k7gsxr600... love the bike and don't thnk any other 600 out there would suit me any better... all my buddies that own dif 600's love it to after they rode it, but there is no fucking way that adding even a 30 hp boost is gonna get it to outrun a gsxr 1000 for any distance... it doesn't matter if the 600 revs higher retard... its still down almost 30hp... keep dreamin
wtzbismarck 2 years ago 2
lighter weight, different gearing and a higher red line, but int the top end with stock gearing a 1000 would take it becuase with stock gearing that thing is still only gonna hit about 160, with higher gearing the bike doesnt have the power to pull on a 1000. so basicly 130 horse power with lower gearing is better accelerating then 150 with slightly higher.
PhilG88 2 years ago
watsup kid its mike the owner of that 600..bikes sick smokes a lil like u said but im workn on that..bike kills 1000s like it nothin...no better feeling then haven the gas tank slam into your chest as u shift pass a 1000 at 120mph..
FullThrottle282 3 years ago
jcopnhvr whats the top speed and HP gains?
rush2905 3 years ago
Im curious how you ran the oil-feed on this set-up. I know it's a kit but where do they get the oil inlet from?
I'm currently working on a DIY setup for my R6... Differant bike, yes, but a general idea of where to get some oil might be nice :)
imprezatt 4 years ago
I love it, all these tools bagging out turbo 600's cause they get minimal HP gains. Lets see one of them ride a stocker to 90-95% of its true potential and then see if they want to try one with an extra 25 hp and the extra difficulty that comes with a turbo. Wankers. Nice bike BTW.
goatsmc 4 years ago 2
Well thank you for commenting on my video that was made over a year ago and I'm sure that everyone here knows that if you want to make big numbers from a turbo 600 (which is a badass ride) you need something other than a stock motor.
Anywho, I need to stick to my new years promise and not give haters the time of day...they never have anything intelligent to add to anything, and when they try, they are always wrong.
jcopnhvr 4 years ago 4
Clever, and just think....not only did you take the time to watch it, you took even more time to make a unintelligent comment. Thanks for watchin!
jcopnhvr 4 years ago
I forgot to say that I shut down at 11,000 rpm early.
TOTLPKG22 4 years ago
Slowboy busts out another Turbo 600...nice job boys. I turbo'd my 02 600 when you guys were doing your 03.
I made 121WHP @ 11,000RPM and 62TQ @ 8000RPM with 6 PSI. Not bad Torque for a little 600cc. I just put a low Compression 03 1000 motor in the 600 frame and am building a new turbo setup for that combination.
TOTLPKG22 4 years ago
OMG, i love the last 4 seconds - sounds so sweet and crisp!
MoleyMolo 4 years ago
the last 4 seconds is not the bike....lol.....its the dyno
supraloverTT08 4 years ago
Sounds good regardless!! lol
MoleyMolo 4 years ago
why dont u try running more boost maybe bout 6 psi that is still save on the motor
gixxer4a 4 years ago
All that money and time just to get only 124hp ??? Damn bro I have more than that stock on my 750 HAHAHHAHAHAHA If you wanted to go faster you should of bought a 1K and then boost that ..
gixMikeAtl 4 years ago 2
its still a 25% gain on a very low boost setting. thats pretty decent from an engineering point of view.
siraff2 4 years ago
The guy that builds the turbo kits has a turbo 1000 that he runs on the street.
MrClothesoff 4 years ago
holy shit. haha. id like to see a long more in depth video if you can do that.
SXRebuilt4u 4 years ago
do u recommenend turbo charging a gsxr600 or buying a gsxr1000?
rush2905 4 years ago
about damn time somebody make me a kit for my 06.
guess ill have to run more boost tho cause im wanting it to get around 65tq
stunt4life 4 years ago
Sorry about the cut off at the end, youtube keeps on taking the last 7 seconds off of my clip. The text reads:
Stock: 99.85hp 40.55 ft/lbs.
Turbo: 124.95ph 52.26 ft/lbs.
This is a very safe tune with pump gas on the stock motor at 4.5 PSI!
jcopnhvr 4 years ago 3