Dude wtf that was so nauseatingly boring!! What happened you stopped sucking off TJ? I miss the good old fashioned pwnage of fakesagan vs coghlan or inmendham. This video was just ZZZzzzz. Let me know when you start doing real pwnage again and not the long winded bullshit like this...
Wow you're back again? HardCase, I can't really decide wether you're awesome or a douchebag. You have a lot of great points, and sometimes you are rational and have own idiots. But then you have these moments like pointing a gun at people and doing some stupid shit like that. What do you have to say about this?
@TheSmoothTerrorist Well yeah, that's perfectly normal. But I'm thinking more about the particular situation where you pull up a gun and point it to someones head and ask them if they are afraid or not? That's not what I would call irrational. I would call that crazy. Out of the norm.
Self ownership means you own the effects of your actions e.g. this argument. By replaying to fringe you are saying HE is responsible for the effects of his body. You can't argue against property rights without affirming property rights. You are exercising control over your body to argue that you can't exercise control over your body. I don't think you understand what you are saying.
@InvincibleNumanist I don't see how that's even relevant, is or ought he's contradicting his values. How is my association with molyneux relevant? "between control and rightful control." care to explain? Rather than just declaring. I'm stupid and need things spelled out for me.
Your videos are ridiculous (in a good, wholesome, family-fun way!). You make subtle insults while lacing your response with the occasional compliment, and then you manage to work your way up to convincing the audience fringe elements is a fascist. That is brilliant.
Just had to comment on the medicine thing. There is no such thing as 'western medicine'. Either something is medicine or it is not. It's always annoyed me when people use the term.
@fringeelements You are a genius,Fringeelements. Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.Quote originally by Benito Mussolini. TheSmoothDickhead he kissed the obese TAA and , basically failed in this video, even more than his last video. We are Anti-Statists, hierarchy in the workplace is a necessary condition of capitalist, free markets, require this. Abolishing the government, gets rid of coercion.
@TehAlexJonesChannel the amazing and the fakesagan have a deep love for each other and he never kissed you GET OVER IT dude be nice not jealous you wont get into the fake's ass with vinegar you get it with honey.
Over the years Ive gotten the feeling that you dont really own true feeling. That everything you say and do is like youre writing a character. like back when you completely changed your mind about Inmendham. Everything you do is a "trick" to give the illusion of personality. You probably always feel alone, even with friends. Friends you would start a fight with at the drop of a hat if it would make you look like you felt something. You would never get along with yourself.
you already rent out your body and mind its called having a job, you give out usage time of your body to somebody else and you get access to economic resources in return the reason you can do this is because of self ownership ( you own your body hint you can rent it out ). if you make it "the law" ( what ever that means ) now 1 of the reasons capitalism works is because humans have a incentive to pull resources to build more awesome stuff ( i personally like are awesome stuff like computers ).
pt3 country- "nation with its own government, occupying a particular territory" says the authority of a dictionary. A government is a law making institution, so the connection is not a leap. About a "world without borders" even in a single neighborhood within a country, there areas that people know not to go in (which would be construed as a border). Also in school during lunch or recess there are self segregating groups based on social cliches, which work as a border of sorts as well.
pt2 the lack of body ownership lacks support, but I don't know the whole debate between you and fringe, the "homestead" seems like it would be applicable here as well (which I think you mention) and ownership is able to be passed down, which you don't agree, combine this with the fact that you solution was that "we all agree that" which implies an ideological base that is not really proven. 20-23 about knowing every detail is irrelevant for ownership or not.
@TheSmoothTerrorist your opinion is not irrelevant, as I am taking time to break down your entire video. I find that aspect of knowing every detail as a "only if" for ownership to be irrelevant. If you believe otherwise you would provide a rebuttal and I would gladly read it.
First 6 minutes can be countered by the fact that you *couldn't* research those issues during that era because the info was not available to be researched so easily. When people have limited time and resources, trust for the authority on foreign items for a simple shortcut where they could not afford to become the authority on the subject. 6-10 was muddle that didn't really matter. I was hoping you would cover theft of your items/crops and how no property rights pertains to that, it felt weak
@TheSmoothTerrorist not as easily researched and thus I meant that it was not something that an average person could pick up by the resources available to him, especially before the internet. The "time and resource" bit is the reason people divert to authority. That factor still remains unchanged, and not everyone has the same time or resources to divert to personally become an authority on the subject due to the multitude of subjects, and not everyone specializing in the same subject.
@TheSmoothTerrorist You just stand on your soapbox, talking nonsense, failing to refute anything that FE said. YAWN, you are really a boring motherfucker.
haha, holy shit. i kind of thought the golden days of fakesagan was gone, and at best we'd only see glimpses of the greatness back then from now on. (not that i was complaining...) but this video actually surpassed anything you did on the fakesagan channel.
Ownership is an illusion whether property or possession. But the lines in the sand as to what is what seem impossible to draw. I don't try. I observe and I react.
@Visfen Yeah, that's exactly what he said. Anyone that believes in free trade is a fascist. Nothing left out of that. 100% honest.
Doesn't it bother you that the only way you can even participate in discourse is by stringing up strawmen and being as dishonest as you can? Are you trying to impress somebody with these vulgar lies?
@Arkinight So if I understand you correctly, you can be a fascist if you're both if you're against and if you're for free markets, as long as the other criteria is fulfilled - that you have a preference for racial homogenity.
You're absolutely ridiculous. Fuck you for being this stupid.
@Visfen "So if I understand you correctly" - all you understand correctly is ad hom attacks and picking and choosing factoids that support your claim then dismissing everything else that may be beyond your paygrade.
Go rage elsewhere child, leave debate and discourse to adults, thanks.
@Arkinight Debate? You haven't been able to make a point in this whole exchange, in fact I had to make it for you.
It's not a debate, it's you being a moron.
Free trade is not fascist, having a preference for racial homogenity is not fascist, fringe is not fascist. You disagreeing and throwing around "fallacies" is incredibly annoying, because you don't seem capable of thinking, you're just imitating what a debate is in a bad way, like a child, a monkey or a parrot.
@Visfen That's right, maybe it's a character flaw that I possess, but I simply do not know how to argue with somebody as dishonest as yourself, either acknowledge what he actually said or don't bother.
@Arkinight You're actually illiterate then? And deaf? I just did, and I made a point about it, one you didn't understand. You've responded to me 10 times already and have failed to even express a valid opinion.
You're basically atheistkult personified. Somebody who has seen people use ad hominem and strawman in argument but don't know what it is, so now you call everything a strawman and ad hominem.
I'm done trying to educate you, it's clearly an impossibility.
@TheSmoothTerrorist As soon as you say "mine" you're introducing a form of property rights. Even so, agriculture wont work unless you own it for the entire season, otherwise other people will just steal what you grow. You'd have to hide it from other people to ever succeed, which mean you would introduce de facto property rights.
Modern medicine can be defended on the grounds that double blind trials, and the scientific method in general, are standard practice these days. Back when people were prescribed dumb shit like blood-letting, these methods were not used, or at least not widespread. The data generally bears out the effectiveness of medical treatments these days. Of course it's good to do your research, even just to make yourself a more educated person, but there are good reasons to trust most modern medicine.
@TheIllestVillain (Although the state of many liberal arts subjects, actually, those more inclined to promote socialism and more left-wing policies, are more like old-school medicine.)
@TheIllestVillain That's probably not what he was talking about. He's talking about people who rigorously followed the scientific methods, got through peer review, and turned out to be hilariously wrong.
@fringeelements "He's talking about people who rigorously followed the scientific methods, got through peer review, and turned out to be hilariously wrong."
What method was used to demonstrate they were wrong though?
I haven't thought about anarchy very much and this question comes out of genuine curiosity. What incentive would there be to create more than one or a few of a given object in such a society? Would computers ever be made? One would have to create each component themselves, it seems. Is this wrong?
But just to bitch about FE. Anyone remember when he destroyed BrainPolice's account? Where the the fuck was the Homesteading Principle or Intersubjective Consensus there?
Nah, BP dropped his own docs all the time. All Fringe did was call him Alex Strekal, which is what everyone knew his name was.
but yeah Fringe definitely hacked BP's account. He got his ex girlfriend to give him the password and went to town on it. And then someone else hacked it off Fringe, so now nobody has it.
@TheSmoothTerrorist Hack isn't the right word. Some way or another FE acquired BP's password then deleted all his videos and closed his account.It's petty, but FE's actions should speak louder than his convoluted view on property rights. In which he has no problem with commandeering someone's work and destroying it.
Really you covered what my big problem with fringeelements has been. His support of ethnically pure direct democracy. To put it more bluntly racist mob rule.
About medical research: everyone I know does that. All my friends do that, my family does that, even my grandma does some research before taking a prescribed medicine.
More and more people use the internet for health info, to research a particular health problem, to assist in diagnosing, to seek information on medicines or check side effects. It's not like you're unique. It's a very popular practice.
you must know a lot of intelligent, skeptic-minded people. i envy you, but i'm dubious that this is really the norm. if it is, nothing would please me more
Hypothetical situation: The winter is coming. I gathered some food for the winter for me and my family. We're not using it right now, so theoretically it's up for grabs, right?
"It's stashed in your house, and you are using your house, so it's temporarily yours".
Great. What if I want to take my family out? We go skiing for a day. We come back, and we see our house occupied and our supplies taken away. Is that how anarchy is supposed to work? I don't see how this is a good idea.
@OurCurlyBen i don't think that occupying a home while there's still dirty dishes in the sink and a teapot boiling on the stove is anyone's idea of "homesteading"
however, i'd be more likely to take residence in your "summer place" if it's standing unoccupied for months while i'm homeless
is the concept of not behaving like a greedy, heartless asshole really so difficult to understand?
@TheSmoothTerrorist It's common sense if you live in a paradise, but not IRL.
You said that agriculture would work without property rights, and I ask: how could it work, with greedy and lazy people still around? With people who are to lazy to gather supplies for the winter and who would rather legally steal them, when OWNERS aren't around.
How to force people to respect the OWNERSHIP of my supplies? How would you force them to not behave like greedy, heartless assholes?
Read my scenario again: I gathered supplies for the winter for me and my family. Someone steals them when I'm not around. How your advice to "defend yourself accordingly" applies here? It doesn't.
It doesn't matter if you work hard, without property rights all that you invest in your future isn't really yours. Others can take your stuff while you're not around and if they are stronger than you, then you're fucked. Great solution indeed...
Let's say you gave the shovel to the onions guy. What's stopping me from waiting a bit, picking your turnips while you're away and eating them?
Agriculture couldn't develop in an environment where anyone could just reap what you saw. Without some kind of property rights people wouldn't be able to enjoy the fruits of their work.
@OneLazyGimp if i returned to find you wheeling away cartloads of my turnips, i'd be pissed and i'd probably bitchslap the shit out of you. if, on the other hand, i returned to find you eating a few turnips, i wouldn't mind at all
i'd probably think to myself "poor guy must be really hungry if he's eating a raw turnip"
@TheSmoothTerrorist So the threat of "bitchslapping" is supposed to stop the thieves?
Well, you weren't there to stop them. Your turnips are gone, along with some of your other "temporary belongings". Someone else is using them right now.
With such conditions agriculture couldn't really develop. Some people would simply give up. Others would organize some help to protect their right to their stuff. You know, like a police force, to secure the property rights...
good point about those pills. Doctors dont always know what's good for you. Maybe you have an other medication and combining the 2 will have some serieus side effects.
@ 9:50 this statement kinda made me stop the video and be like "why didn't you just stay on point and be the bigger man, and just keep making points instead of trying to insult the guy."
@turnxitxaround reading this comment kinda made me stop and be like "why didn't you just watch the video and then go make a sammich and fap instead of sanctimoniously chiding me like you think you're my mother or something"
@ProDCloud I see your sub'd to heyruka. She isn't racist too, right? Except that clip of her saying she is a racist and that clip where she say racism is perfectly fine. I wonder who her biggest supporter is? Oh wait her biggest supporter is undeniably Stodles.
Hey maybe instead of picking on somebody's preference whether it be rational or not why don't you look if whether or not those people would be willing to let you live your preferences. I respect white nationalists in the sense that they want a society for them and them only and im Latino. I don't feel the need to resort to adhominem or strawmanning. Im just tired of people going around as if this race thing mattered so much.
@ProDCloud Blacks and Latinos won't let me live my "own preference?" I don't want to segregate people of colour from society because I think they are inferior. And define "white," Northern Europeans? Italians? Greeks? Arabs? Who is white?
@DKshad0w You can't say racism is natural and say she is not racist, because it means everybody including her is racist. In her earlier videos; she refers to her "higher ups" which was obviously Fringe because he was spamming her comments section.
I don't know what you mean they wont let you live "your preferences?" Its not about segregation is about people being able to disassociate with whoever they want for whatever reason they want, whether it be something rational or not to you or me is irrelevant. Does it matter who they may be? If people want to disassociate and prevent further subsidization of another being then imo they should be able to.
@ProDCloud If you disassociate from people because of their skin colour, then that is racism. You're not judging the quality of that person; you're lumping him into a category of people who you have preconceived notions about. If you're stance on this issue is too separate the races, then that is called segregation.
Even racism is subjective though, some people think a racist seeks to cause genocide towards another race(s), others think its just wanting to disassociate or behaving differently, so which is it? Why would you want to force people who wish to disassociate from a certain quality whether it be behavior, appearance, or tendencies against their will? If you wish to combine the races against their will, then that is called genocide.
@ProDCloud Racism is discriminating against a group because of ethnic origin or skin colour. Genocide is the extermination of another group.
Who exactly is "Forc[ing] people," to live with other races? Go to an island and only let other white people in. I wonder how many people would go there with you.
What is discriminating? Are some people discriminating because they wish to not subsidize the existence of others? Why does the justification for their preference matter so much? Since multiculturalism cause "groups" to disappear then it must be genocide right?
Well i thought this would be obvious due to the theme but the state forces people to live with/subsidize with others due to taxation and other public monopolies. How does that relate to what were talking about?
@ProDCloud Multiculturalism does NOT cause genocide. It does not force people to have interracial marriages or interracial babies. Genocide is the DELIBERATE extermination of one group.
Why do you think one racial group subsidizes another, when there are people living off welfare from every ethnicity? The state has told you not to discriminate against other groups, but you do not have to live with them. As I said before, buy an island and only allow white people in.
You're the one who defined it as extermination, you never said it had to be deliberate or not. I think its funny that you think there's a difference though its like if i killed someone on accident, because it wasn't DELIBERATE it was okay right?
Does it matter? Its still coerced subsidization. "Discrimination" is "subjective" and its useless because all it does is assume the intention of people which is stupid. Try refusing a certain service to a specific race and watch how fast the state comes down on you for it. Whats with this "love it or leave it" crap?, there's plenty of land that's unused in the U.S. and that presupposes that you own what you claim for me to leave off of. I'm done with you.
@ProDCloud If you kill people from an ethnic group without an intention to exterminate that group, then that's not genocide. It's horrible, but it doesn't fit the definition of genocide. Agreed, there's plenty of land for you in the USA to start white only towns. Go do that; I'm sure it'll be a complete success.
White nationalists for the most part hate gays and Latinos. So, Stodles is a homosexual and you're Latino (apparently), so why do you support people that hate both your guts?
@lulzcoaster No, heyruka never said she was a racist. She also didn't say racism is "fine" she said racism is natural so therefore it is innate. FE wasn't the only supporter of heyruka, nor was he the "biggest". laughingman0X, spawktalk, MrHerrIQ, and others also made videos in support of her.
Case, this may be a stupid question, but I think you said that you dont think that there can be a true anarchist society. I would Understand what you meant by thins if you werent a person calling his self an anarchist. I was under the impression that a Communist is hoping for or working toward a communist society, a capitalist toward a capitalism, and the same for an anarchist. In calling yourself an anarchist, are you hoping that one day for anarchy? Seems contradictory if its not possible.
@MMbass420 i'm not trying to solve any problems or build any utopias. i care about individual liberty (primarily, but not exclusively, my own) and all other considerations be damned
I'm inclined to agree, if humanity is going to kill itself because it's own stupidity, we aren't stopping it, but government's just bringing it quicker.
@TheSmoothTerrorist Interesting. Just as a curiosity, how far of individual freedom do you support? Like i agree with freedom until it interferes with someone else. By interfere i mean in any way more than like "Offensive."
So you hit back with an idiosyncratic definition of fascism that you pulled out of your ass. I guess the people of Japan, China, and Hong Kong are fascist since they support trade and desires ethnic homogeneity.
@fringeelements glad to see that you guys are starting to figure me out
yes, i do consider them fascists (the first two at any rate. i don't know enough about hong kong)
china uses tanks against their own citizens and conducts domestic spying ffs. i think it's been obvious for a long time that they're commies in name only. and don't even get me started about japan
scoff all you want but, if it looks, acts and quacks like a duck, it's a fucking duck
@TheSmoothTerrorist Hong Kong has a very free market, but also has a very tight immigration policy. Does that make it fascist?
Although the desire for ethnic homogeneity could be a criteria for being a fascist. I don't see how liking or support for trade and capitalism is a criteria for being a fascist, in fact that is diametrically oppose the standard definition of fascism. It seems to me you are just using the "f" word as a pejorative like so many other people. If it quacks like a duck...
@GiantKukri well, you have to try to refrain from making value judgements about foreign cultures (cultural relativism) but i'll agree the japs do seem pretty fucked up
they committed the worst atrocities of WWII hands down and it's strange how they seem to have gotten a pass
some of the shit they did would've made josef mengele blush
i would LOVE to make a video response to these videos (in a good way you can say yes)
BUT,my Eng language,says something else:/ even how fluent i am,some words,i just can't find when i really want to explain stuff like this! i could but..ye!
What a pathetic guy, so sad to watch.
And boring.
RagdollRalph 4 days ago
Olololol Straightd0pe.
You suck dude.
p0rkch0ps 2 weeks ago
Whats your opinion on anarcho-primitivism, or green anarchy or whatever you wanna call it.
Do you think its possible for us to live in a more primitive and environmentally conscious world while still retaining modern sensibilities?
AnarchistOverman 3 weeks ago
Dude wtf that was so nauseatingly boring!! What happened you stopped sucking off TJ? I miss the good old fashioned pwnage of fakesagan vs coghlan or inmendham. This video was just ZZZzzzz. Let me know when you start doing real pwnage again and not the long winded bullshit like this...
Yewon2001 1 month ago
Good video. Really put things in perspective.
twelvepointnine 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TheSmoothTerrorist
Your videos fucking suck. Get a real camera, asshole!
TheSmoothTurd 1 month ago
Wow you're back again? HardCase, I can't really decide wether you're awesome or a douchebag. You have a lot of great points, and sometimes you are rational and have own idiots. But then you have these moments like pointing a gun at people and doing some stupid shit like that. What do you have to say about this?
DonQuixotec 1 month ago
@DonQuixotec Okay, "are rational and owns idiots". Maybe.
DonQuixotec 1 month ago
@DonQuixotec what do i say to the accusation that i'm rational most of the time but irrational and even violent some of the time?
i say that i'm no different from any other human being
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist Well yeah, that's perfectly normal. But I'm thinking more about the particular situation where you pull up a gun and point it to someones head and ask them if they are afraid or not? That's not what I would call irrational. I would call that crazy. Out of the norm.
DonQuixotec 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist I'll second that, great video
MegaDarkmirror 1 month ago
keep it fake
snarfeater 1 month ago
fake you tell the truth but fringe has some good ideas
snarfeater 1 month ago
Self ownership means you own the effects of your actions e.g. this argument. By replaying to fringe you are saying HE is responsible for the effects of his body. You can't argue against property rights without affirming property rights. You are exercising control over your body to argue that you can't exercise control over your body. I don't think you understand what you are saying.
drogden 1 month ago
@drogden
theres a different between control and rightful control.
Youre making an "is" statement but slipping in an "ought" statement. Lemme guess, youre a fan of Molyneux.
InvincibleNumanist 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@InvincibleNumanist I don't see how that's even relevant, is or ought he's contradicting his values. How is my association with molyneux relevant? "between control and rightful control." care to explain? Rather than just declaring. I'm stupid and need things spelled out for me.
drogden 1 month ago
Your videos are ridiculous (in a good, wholesome, family-fun way!). You make subtle insults while lacing your response with the occasional compliment, and then you manage to work your way up to convincing the audience fringe elements is a fascist. That is brilliant.
wintershadows 1 month ago
I'm pretty sure Fringe is gonna dice up this video...
ksquared83 1 month ago
Background music, please, anyone?
ObsidianTeen 1 month ago
Just had to comment on the medicine thing. There is no such thing as 'western medicine'. Either something is medicine or it is not. It's always annoyed me when people use the term.
HeavyTrafficAhead 1 month ago
@HeavyTrafficAhead It's always annoyed me when someone used the term "chinese silk". Either something is silk or it is not.
fringeelements 1 month ago
@fringeelements You are a genius,Fringeelements. Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.Quote originally by Benito Mussolini. TheSmoothDickhead he kissed the obese TAA and , basically failed in this video, even more than his last video. We are Anti-Statists, hierarchy in the workplace is a necessary condition of capitalist, free markets, require this. Abolishing the government, gets rid of coercion.
TehAlexJonesChannel 1 month ago 2
@TehAlexJonesChannel
"We are Anti-Statists, heirarchy (hierarchy) in the workplace is a necessary condition of capitalist, free markets, require this."
Call yourself what you will but you're still a dick sucker.
catbuffalo 1 month ago
@TehAlexJonesChannel the amazing and the fakesagan have a deep love for each other and he never kissed you GET OVER IT dude be nice not jealous you wont get into the fake's ass with vinegar you get it with honey.
snarfeater 1 month ago
@fringeelements
american beer is just beer.
catbuffalo 1 month ago
@catbuffalo German cars are just cars.
fringeelements 1 month ago
what about pollution?
how do you subdue that?
bla34112 1 month ago
@bla34112 Pretend global warming is not a problem.
TheScrewOnHead 1 month ago
@TheScrewOnHead
well, first of all, i was not talking about global warming, i was talking about pollution.
second of all, you're a fuckhead, and fuckheads like you are a problem.
bla34112 1 month ago
@bla34112 Take a chill pill.
TheScrewOnHead 1 month ago
@TheScrewOnHead
onom nom nom
bla34112 1 month ago
Over the years Ive gotten the feeling that you dont really own true feeling. That everything you say and do is like youre writing a character. like back when you completely changed your mind about Inmendham. Everything you do is a "trick" to give the illusion of personality. You probably always feel alone, even with friends. Friends you would start a fight with at the drop of a hat if it would make you look like you felt something. You would never get along with yourself.
radionr3 1 month ago
There are a lot of stefbot "anarchists" out there these days.
slipcurve 1 month ago
@slipcurve They're not real.
MaxStirner4Lyfe 1 month ago
Whether I agree with you or not, you always make me think Smooth Sagan. Thank you.
Textra1 1 month ago
Man, I missed you when you were gone, brother. Keep ,making videos at a furious rate.
TheSpoonFedFukWit 1 month ago
you already rent out your body and mind its called having a job, you give out usage time of your body to somebody else and you get access to economic resources in return the reason you can do this is because of self ownership ( you own your body hint you can rent it out ). if you make it "the law" ( what ever that means ) now 1 of the reasons capitalism works is because humans have a incentive to pull resources to build more awesome stuff ( i personally like are awesome stuff like computers ).
deathZor42 1 month ago
if anyone does respond, thank you for your time, pick apart where you take issues with my criticism.
TicTocKnight 1 month ago
pt3 country- "nation with its own government, occupying a particular territory" says the authority of a dictionary. A government is a law making institution, so the connection is not a leap. About a "world without borders" even in a single neighborhood within a country, there areas that people know not to go in (which would be construed as a border). Also in school during lunch or recess there are self segregating groups based on social cliches, which work as a border of sorts as well.
TicTocKnight 1 month ago
pt2 the lack of body ownership lacks support, but I don't know the whole debate between you and fringe, the "homestead" seems like it would be applicable here as well (which I think you mention) and ownership is able to be passed down, which you don't agree, combine this with the fact that you solution was that "we all agree that" which implies an ideological base that is not really proven. 20-23 about knowing every detail is irrelevant for ownership or not.
TicTocKnight 1 month ago
@TicTocKnight thank you for informing me that my opinion is irrelevant
allow me to return the favor in kind
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist your opinion is not irrelevant, as I am taking time to break down your entire video. I find that aspect of knowing every detail as a "only if" for ownership to be irrelevant. If you believe otherwise you would provide a rebuttal and I would gladly read it.
TicTocKnight 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist BLAH BLAH BLAH YOUR A FASCIST BLAH BLAH BLAH
GO RIDE THE AMAZING ATHEIST'S DICK. STFU
TehAlexJonesChannel 1 month ago
@TehAlexJonesChannel it looks to me like you're the one doing the dick riding around here =)
js brah
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
First 6 minutes can be countered by the fact that you *couldn't* research those issues during that era because the info was not available to be researched so easily. When people have limited time and resources, trust for the authority on foreign items for a simple shortcut where they could not afford to become the authority on the subject. 6-10 was muddle that didn't really matter. I was hoping you would cover theft of your items/crops and how no property rights pertains to that, it felt weak
TicTocKnight 1 month ago
@TicTocKnight you are incorrect
the information that mercury is dangerous was available in abe lincoln's day. even medieval alchemists knew of it's dangers
whether or not the research would've been "easy" is neither here nor there
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist not as easily researched and thus I meant that it was not something that an average person could pick up by the resources available to him, especially before the internet. The "time and resource" bit is the reason people divert to authority. That factor still remains unchanged, and not everyone has the same time or resources to divert to personally become an authority on the subject due to the multitude of subjects, and not everyone specializing in the same subject.
TicTocKnight 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist You just stand on your soapbox, talking nonsense, failing to refute anything that FE said. YAWN, you are really a boring motherfucker.
TehAlexJonesChannel 1 month ago
haha, holy shit. i kind of thought the golden days of fakesagan was gone, and at best we'd only see glimpses of the greatness back then from now on. (not that i was complaining...) but this video actually surpassed anything you did on the fakesagan channel.
Svankmajer 1 month ago
Ownership is an illusion whether property or possession. But the lines in the sand as to what is what seem impossible to draw. I don't try. I observe and I react.
GiantKukri 1 month ago
@GiantKukri that's the best policy, i think
codifying moral decisions into inflexible axioms and laws short-circuits our innate ability to make moral judgements on a case-by-case basis
if you ask me, all "justice" is "vigilante justice"
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GiantKukri "Ownership is an illusion whether property or possession."
Bald assertion. If it's an illusion then you need to explain why. Why are the aspects of reality the human mind perceives as property an illusion?
shlockofgod 1 month ago
Justin Bieber is sooo fit in this video!!! DREAMY!11
thesoundengine 1 month ago
"death does not respect the property rights of mortals".. awesome line.
SkidRowRadio 1 month ago
@SkidRowRadio
"ideas don't die, they go underground"
my favorite from the video
Ceraknot 1 month ago
the term ownership is not applicable to human body's ,interesting Idea one that I've never considered .
sausage4mash 1 month ago
@sausage4mash it seems to be an idea that the united states patent office shares
they have decided that it's legal to register patents on lifeforms but not on a full-birth human being
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
29:00 Hah, Oh god fakesagan is such an unintellectual mental midget, free trade is fascist? What a laugh.
Visfen 1 month ago
@Visfen Yeah, that's exactly what he said. Anyone that believes in free trade is a fascist. Nothing left out of that. 100% honest.
Doesn't it bother you that the only way you can even participate in discourse is by stringing up strawmen and being as dishonest as you can? Are you trying to impress somebody with these vulgar lies?
Arkinight 1 month ago
@Arkinight He said that fascists believe in free trade.
They don't.
How is it a strawman to paraphrase someone? Are you f@cking retarded or something?
Visfen 1 month ago
@Visfen That's all he said, hey?
Arkinight 1 month ago
@Arkinight Did I say that?
Visfen 1 month ago
@Visfen That's all you wrote, yeah.
Arkinight 1 month ago
@Arkinight Me leaving something out is different from denying its existence.
Fine, I'll make your argument for you since you're being so obtuse. "He went on to say that blah blah race".
Which is just as stupid, as a preference is not an ideology.
Visfen 1 month ago
@Visfen Leave out the parts that conflate with your conclusion; focus on the parts that reinforce it.
Arkinight 1 month ago
@Arkinight So if I understand you correctly, you can be a fascist if you're both if you're against and if you're for free markets, as long as the other criteria is fulfilled - that you have a preference for racial homogenity.
You're absolutely ridiculous. Fuck you for being this stupid.
Visfen 1 month ago
@Visfen Fuck me for pointing out the strawman you were attacking.
Arkinight 1 month ago
@Arkinight Fuck you for not even knowing what a strawman is.
Visfen 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Visfen free trade is fascist? What a laugh.
Arkinight 1 month ago
@Visfen "So if I understand you correctly" - all you understand correctly is ad hom attacks and picking and choosing factoids that support your claim then dismissing everything else that may be beyond your paygrade.
Go rage elsewhere child, leave debate and discourse to adults, thanks.
Arkinight 1 month ago
@Arkinight Debate? You haven't been able to make a point in this whole exchange, in fact I had to make it for you.
It's not a debate, it's you being a moron.
Free trade is not fascist, having a preference for racial homogenity is not fascist, fringe is not fascist. You disagreeing and throwing around "fallacies" is incredibly annoying, because you don't seem capable of thinking, you're just imitating what a debate is in a bad way, like a child, a monkey or a parrot.
Visfen 1 month ago
@Visfen That's right, maybe it's a character flaw that I possess, but I simply do not know how to argue with somebody as dishonest as yourself, either acknowledge what he actually said or don't bother.
Arkinight 1 month ago
@Arkinight You're actually illiterate then? And deaf? I just did, and I made a point about it, one you didn't understand. You've responded to me 10 times already and have failed to even express a valid opinion.
You're basically atheistkult personified. Somebody who has seen people use ad hominem and strawman in argument but don't know what it is, so now you call everything a strawman and ad hominem.
I'm done trying to educate you, it's clearly an impossibility.
Visfen 1 month ago
go away troll
Arkinight 1 month ago
12:29 "My garden" . You just rejected property rights in the previous sentence.
Visfen 1 month ago
@Visfen yes, and i stipulated that the garden is only "mine" because i'm actively using it in the following sentence
i find sophistry like this very tedious
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist As soon as you say "mine" you're introducing a form of property rights. Even so, agriculture wont work unless you own it for the entire season, otherwise other people will just steal what you grow. You'd have to hide it from other people to ever succeed, which mean you would introduce de facto property rights.
Visfen 1 month ago
Modern medicine can be defended on the grounds that double blind trials, and the scientific method in general, are standard practice these days. Back when people were prescribed dumb shit like blood-letting, these methods were not used, or at least not widespread. The data generally bears out the effectiveness of medical treatments these days. Of course it's good to do your research, even just to make yourself a more educated person, but there are good reasons to trust most modern medicine.
TheIllestVillain 1 month ago
@TheIllestVillain (Although the state of many liberal arts subjects, actually, those more inclined to promote socialism and more left-wing policies, are more like old-school medicine.)
TheIllestVillain 1 month ago
Comment removed
TheIllestVillain 1 month ago
@TheIllestVillain That's probably not what he was talking about. He's talking about people who rigorously followed the scientific methods, got through peer review, and turned out to be hilariously wrong.
fringeelements 1 month ago
@fringeelements My point is that you can evaluate ideas, opinions, prescriptions etc individually with objectively valid criteria.
TheIllestVillain 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fringeelements "He's talking about people who rigorously followed the scientific methods, got through peer review, and turned out to be hilariously wrong."
What method was used to demonstrate they were wrong though?
shlockofgod 1 month ago
31 mins long, not watching. fuck that.
SCL0PS 1 month ago
I haven't thought about anarchy very much and this question comes out of genuine curiosity. What incentive would there be to create more than one or a few of a given object in such a society? Would computers ever be made? One would have to create each component themselves, it seems. Is this wrong?
Mackaframmalamma 1 month ago
@Mackaframmalamma you'll have to refer that question to a utopian anarchist. i'm more of the chaos-worshipping, criminal sort
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
The part were were you claimed the self is an illusion just wound me up.
The nature of the self and free-will and so on are still open philosophical and scientific questions.
To just make the assertion you made is uncharacteristically dogmatic.
shlockofgod 1 month ago
I think the weakness in both your and fringeelements arguments is that they're basically arguments from effect.
Your points against property consist mostly of "we don't need it .." or "it's bad because..." or "it leads to..." and so on.
Fringelements point was that "we can't have X without it..." (or in the comments he's redefines property as possession).
These saying nothing about the truth of the matter. Property exists as a valid concept or it does not. The consequences are are irrelevant.
shlockofgod 1 month ago
@shlockofgod It's a subjective human concept, along with all other things like rights.
45means45 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@45means45 "It's a subjective human concept, along with all other things like rights."
So?
shlockofgod 1 month ago
But just to bitch about FE. Anyone remember when he destroyed BrainPolice's account? Where the the fuck was the Homesteading Principle or Intersubjective Consensus there?
TheScrewOnHead 1 month ago
@TheScrewOnHead
Brainpolice had logged out, so via Brainpolice2's mutualist property rights theory, fringeelements was justified in taking it over.
InvincibleNumanist 1 month ago 4
@InvincibleNumanist
haha good one
ProDCloud 1 month ago
@InvincibleNumanist You're good!
45means45 1 month ago
@TheScrewOnHead i knew about FE dropping BP's docs, but i didn't know he hacked his account
i'll remain skeptical of that accusation until i've seen convincing proof but, if it proves true, all i have to say is this...
silencing one's opponent by force is the ultimate ragequit
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist
Nah, BP dropped his own docs all the time. All Fringe did was call him Alex Strekal, which is what everyone knew his name was.
but yeah Fringe definitely hacked BP's account. He got his ex girlfriend to give him the password and went to town on it. And then someone else hacked it off Fringe, so now nobody has it.
InvincibleNumanist 1 month ago
@InvincibleNumanist well, i suppose hearsay is a type of "evidence," lol
pretty fucking lame if it's true
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist
watch?v=ztI991czCfU its not heresay, fringe even admits it. its so long ago that nobody really says anything about it. he just got away with it lol
InvincibleNumanist 1 month ago
@InvincibleNumanist Yup, and I'd do it again too. And I made it public as I was doing it.
fringeelements 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist Hack isn't the right word. Some way or another FE acquired BP's password then deleted all his videos and closed his account.It's petty, but FE's actions should speak louder than his convoluted view on property rights. In which he has no problem with commandeering someone's work and destroying it.
TheScrewOnHead 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist watch?v=ztI991czCfU
TheScrewOnHead 1 month ago
A property right is just an agreement between two or more people with respect to a particular object.
sharperguy 1 month ago
Really you covered what my big problem with fringeelements has been. His support of ethnically pure direct democracy. To put it more bluntly racist mob rule.
TheScrewOnHead 1 month ago
About 7 minutes in this is exactly what I responded in a comment regarding the noam chomsky authority thing.
It's ridiculous to say that agreeing with something someone says = automatically submitting to authority.
LJPpro 1 month ago
I'm disappointed.
lovingsingleton 1 month ago
I didn't think there were any self-avowed fascists either but then the internet surprised me yet again.
ironmarch[dot]org
atypicalguy 1 month ago
Here in Europe fascism is in full bloom, and it`s in no way underground.
MakkaPakka666 1 month ago
I've always thought of anarchy as a natural transitional state. Does that hold true with you views on the matter?
calvin8hobbs 1 month ago
@calvin8hobbs i'm not sure. i'll need you to go into a bit more detail before i can answer
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
The british royal family engaged in "medicinal cannibalism" only a hundred years ago..
LobsterPotsticker 1 month ago
@LobsterPotsticker Where'd you find that out? I wanna see! :D
Donatellangelo 1 month ago
fringe called you "the most anarchist of the anarchists" so be thankful he gave you this compliment!
marketanarchist2011 1 month ago
@marketanarchist2011 if gg allin returned from the grave and called me "the most anarchist," i would be thankful for the compliment
if hermann goring returned from the grave and called me "the most anarchist," it wouldn't be quite as meaningful
what the fuck does fringeelements know about anarchism? he's a fascist
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
About medical research: everyone I know does that. All my friends do that, my family does that, even my grandma does some research before taking a prescribed medicine.
More and more people use the internet for health info, to research a particular health problem, to assist in diagnosing, to seek information on medicines or check side effects. It's not like you're unique. It's a very popular practice.
OurCurlyBen 1 month ago
@OurCurlyBen "everyone i know does that"
you must know a lot of intelligent, skeptic-minded people. i envy you, but i'm dubious that this is really the norm. if it is, nothing would please me more
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist Maybe I went a bit overboard with "everyone", but still, it really is a common practice.
OurCurlyBen 1 month ago
Hypothetical situation: The winter is coming. I gathered some food for the winter for me and my family. We're not using it right now, so theoretically it's up for grabs, right?
"It's stashed in your house, and you are using your house, so it's temporarily yours".
Great. What if I want to take my family out? We go skiing for a day. We come back, and we see our house occupied and our supplies taken away. Is that how anarchy is supposed to work? I don't see how this is a good idea.
OurCurlyBen 1 month ago
@OurCurlyBen i don't think that occupying a home while there's still dirty dishes in the sink and a teapot boiling on the stove is anyone's idea of "homesteading"
however, i'd be more likely to take residence in your "summer place" if it's standing unoccupied for months while i'm homeless
is the concept of not behaving like a greedy, heartless asshole really so difficult to understand?
this is common sense shit, people...
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist It's common sense if you live in a paradise, but not IRL.
You said that agriculture would work without property rights, and I ask: how could it work, with greedy and lazy people still around? With people who are to lazy to gather supplies for the winter and who would rather legally steal them, when OWNERS aren't around.
How to force people to respect the OWNERSHIP of my supplies? How would you force them to not behave like greedy, heartless assholes?
OurCurlyBen 1 month ago
@OurCurlyBen
you don't... you just defend yourself accordingly. That's the point.
GiantKukri 1 month ago
@GiantKukri That's the point?
Read my scenario again: I gathered supplies for the winter for me and my family. Someone steals them when I'm not around. How your advice to "defend yourself accordingly" applies here? It doesn't.
It doesn't matter if you work hard, without property rights all that you invest in your future isn't really yours. Others can take your stuff while you're not around and if they are stronger than you, then you're fucked. Great solution indeed...
OurCurlyBen 1 month ago
Let's say you gave the shovel to the onions guy. What's stopping me from waiting a bit, picking your turnips while you're away and eating them?
Agriculture couldn't develop in an environment where anyone could just reap what you saw. Without some kind of property rights people wouldn't be able to enjoy the fruits of their work.
OneLazyGimp 1 month ago
@OneLazyGimp if i returned to find you wheeling away cartloads of my turnips, i'd be pissed and i'd probably bitchslap the shit out of you. if, on the other hand, i returned to find you eating a few turnips, i wouldn't mind at all
i'd probably think to myself "poor guy must be really hungry if he's eating a raw turnip"
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist So the threat of "bitchslapping" is supposed to stop the thieves?
Well, you weren't there to stop them. Your turnips are gone, along with some of your other "temporary belongings". Someone else is using them right now.
With such conditions agriculture couldn't really develop. Some people would simply give up. Others would organize some help to protect their right to their stuff. You know, like a police force, to secure the property rights...
OneLazyGimp 1 month ago
good point about those pills. Doctors dont always know what's good for you. Maybe you have an other medication and combining the 2 will have some serieus side effects.
wildshape 1 month ago
17:45 ...I call first dibs on the corpse ;)
theantigaia 1 month ago
@ 9:50 this statement kinda made me stop the video and be like "why didn't you just stay on point and be the bigger man, and just keep making points instead of trying to insult the guy."
turnxitxaround 1 month ago
@turnxitxaround reading this comment kinda made me stop and be like "why didn't you just watch the video and then go make a sammich and fap instead of sanctimoniously chiding me like you think you're my mother or something"
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
Stodles' "race realism" arguments are utter bunk; he's probably just a racist trying to justify his opinions.
I am a capitalist, but I agree with you that Stodles is a fascist.
lulzcoaster 1 month ago
@lulzcoaster
Oh look another "racist" claim.
ProDCloud 1 month ago 2
@ProDCloud I see your sub'd to heyruka. She isn't racist too, right? Except that clip of her saying she is a racist and that clip where she say racism is perfectly fine. I wonder who her biggest supporter is? Oh wait her biggest supporter is undeniably Stodles.
lulzcoaster 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
@lulzcoaster
Hey maybe instead of picking on somebody's preference whether it be rational or not why don't you look if whether or not those people would be willing to let you live your preferences. I respect white nationalists in the sense that they want a society for them and them only and im Latino. I don't feel the need to resort to adhominem or strawmanning. Im just tired of people going around as if this race thing mattered so much.
ProDCloud 1 month ago 2
@ProDCloud Blacks and Latinos won't let me live my "own preference?" I don't want to segregate people of colour from society because I think they are inferior. And define "white," Northern Europeans? Italians? Greeks? Arabs? Who is white?
@DKshad0w You can't say racism is natural and say she is not racist, because it means everybody including her is racist. In her earlier videos; she refers to her "higher ups" which was obviously Fringe because he was spamming her comments section.
lulzcoaster 1 month ago
Comment removed
ProDCloud 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lulzcoaster
I don't know what you mean they wont let you live "your preferences?" Its not about segregation is about people being able to disassociate with whoever they want for whatever reason they want, whether it be something rational or not to you or me is irrelevant. Does it matter who they may be? If people want to disassociate and prevent further subsidization of another being then imo they should be able to.
ProDCloud 1 month ago
@ProDCloud If you disassociate from people because of their skin colour, then that is racism. You're not judging the quality of that person; you're lumping him into a category of people who you have preconceived notions about. If you're stance on this issue is too separate the races, then that is called segregation.
lulzcoaster 1 month ago
@lulzcoaster
Even racism is subjective though, some people think a racist seeks to cause genocide towards another race(s), others think its just wanting to disassociate or behaving differently, so which is it? Why would you want to force people who wish to disassociate from a certain quality whether it be behavior, appearance, or tendencies against their will? If you wish to combine the races against their will, then that is called genocide.
ProDCloud 1 month ago
@ProDCloud Racism is discriminating against a group because of ethnic origin or skin colour. Genocide is the extermination of another group.
Who exactly is "Forc[ing] people," to live with other races? Go to an island and only let other white people in. I wonder how many people would go there with you.
lulzcoaster 1 month ago
@lulzcoaster
What is discriminating? Are some people discriminating because they wish to not subsidize the existence of others? Why does the justification for their preference matter so much? Since multiculturalism cause "groups" to disappear then it must be genocide right?
Well i thought this would be obvious due to the theme but the state forces people to live with/subsidize with others due to taxation and other public monopolies. How does that relate to what were talking about?
ProDCloud 1 month ago
@ProDCloud Multiculturalism does NOT cause genocide. It does not force people to have interracial marriages or interracial babies. Genocide is the DELIBERATE extermination of one group.
Why do you think one racial group subsidizes another, when there are people living off welfare from every ethnicity? The state has told you not to discriminate against other groups, but you do not have to live with them. As I said before, buy an island and only allow white people in.
lulzcoaster 1 month ago
@lulzcoaster
You're the one who defined it as extermination, you never said it had to be deliberate or not. I think its funny that you think there's a difference though its like if i killed someone on accident, because it wasn't DELIBERATE it was okay right?
ProDCloud 1 month ago
@lulzcoaster
Does it matter? Its still coerced subsidization. "Discrimination" is "subjective" and its useless because all it does is assume the intention of people which is stupid. Try refusing a certain service to a specific race and watch how fast the state comes down on you for it. Whats with this "love it or leave it" crap?, there's plenty of land that's unused in the U.S. and that presupposes that you own what you claim for me to leave off of. I'm done with you.
ProDCloud 1 month ago
@ProDCloud If you kill people from an ethnic group without an intention to exterminate that group, then that's not genocide. It's horrible, but it doesn't fit the definition of genocide. Agreed, there's plenty of land for you in the USA to start white only towns. Go do that; I'm sure it'll be a complete success.
White nationalists for the most part hate gays and Latinos. So, Stodles is a homosexual and you're Latino (apparently), so why do you support people that hate both your guts?
lulzcoaster 1 month ago
@ProDCloud "I respect white nationalists in the sense that they want a society for them and them only and im Latino."
i love how you think that being latino qualifies you to endorse ethnic cleansing
i guess only white people can be racist, eh?
jackass
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist
Okay TheSmoothStrawman because freedom of association=genocide.
ProDCloud 1 month ago
@lulzcoaster No, heyruka never said she was a racist. She also didn't say racism is "fine" she said racism is natural so therefore it is innate. FE wasn't the only supporter of heyruka, nor was he the "biggest". laughingman0X, spawktalk, MrHerrIQ, and others also made videos in support of her.
DKshad0w 1 month ago
@lulzcoaster How the hell is a he a fascist you moron?
Visfen 1 month ago
Case, this may be a stupid question, but I think you said that you dont think that there can be a true anarchist society. I would Understand what you meant by thins if you werent a person calling his self an anarchist. I was under the impression that a Communist is hoping for or working toward a communist society, a capitalist toward a capitalism, and the same for an anarchist. In calling yourself an anarchist, are you hoping that one day for anarchy? Seems contradictory if its not possible.
MMbass420 1 month ago
@MMbass420 i'm not trying to solve any problems or build any utopias. i care about individual liberty (primarily, but not exclusively, my own) and all other considerations be damned
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist
I'm inclined to agree, if humanity is going to kill itself because it's own stupidity, we aren't stopping it, but government's just bringing it quicker.
resincoatedlungs 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist Interesting. Just as a curiosity, how far of individual freedom do you support? Like i agree with freedom until it interferes with someone else. By interfere i mean in any way more than like "Offensive."
MMbass420 1 month ago
@MMbass420 I guess it's like you believe in some of the points within a "ism" but not them all...
Ifailatlife1991 1 month ago
you must question everything!...well yeah everything.
onao1975 1 month ago
You are one of the most interesting people on Youtube right now.
P.S. Loved the Polonius quote.
Forehead2Brick 1 month ago
FEs definition of a state is not unique. Weber and de soto have similar definitions.
paradoarify 1 month ago
@paradoarify it may not be unique but it's still odd
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
So you hit back with an idiosyncratic definition of fascism that you pulled out of your ass. I guess the people of Japan, China, and Hong Kong are fascist since they support trade and desires ethnic homogeneity.
DKshad0w 1 month ago
@DKshad0w Um... he probably would agree that those people are lol
fringeelements 1 month ago
@fringeelements
of course not because it's clearly anarchistic....
catbuffalo 1 month ago
@fringeelements glad to see that you guys are starting to figure me out
yes, i do consider them fascists (the first two at any rate. i don't know enough about hong kong)
china uses tanks against their own citizens and conducts domestic spying ffs. i think it's been obvious for a long time that they're commies in name only. and don't even get me started about japan
scoff all you want but, if it looks, acts and quacks like a duck, it's a fucking duck
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago 2
@TheSmoothTerrorist Hong Kong has a very free market, but also has a very tight immigration policy. Does that make it fascist?
Although the desire for ethnic homogeneity could be a criteria for being a fascist. I don't see how liking or support for trade and capitalism is a criteria for being a fascist, in fact that is diametrically oppose the standard definition of fascism. It seems to me you are just using the "f" word as a pejorative like so many other people. If it quacks like a duck...
DKshad0w 1 month ago 2
@TheSmoothTerrorist
The culture of Japan strikes me as extremely disturbing...
GiantKukri 1 month ago
@GiantKukri well, you have to try to refrain from making value judgements about foreign cultures (cultural relativism) but i'll agree the japs do seem pretty fucked up
they committed the worst atrocities of WWII hands down and it's strange how they seem to have gotten a pass
some of the shit they did would've made josef mengele blush
TheSmoothTerrorist 1 month ago
@TheSmoothTerrorist
Funny, I make value judgments about my own culture all the time. Why should they get a pass because I wasn't born into it? :P
GiantKukri 1 month ago
@DKshad0w He 100% would say they are fascist, and so is his grandmother.
45means45 1 month ago
i would LOVE to make a video response to these videos (in a good way you can say yes)
BUT,my Eng language,says something else:/ even how fluent i am,some words,i just can't find when i really want to explain stuff like this! i could but..ye!
well i can talk swedish with eng sub hahaha
IceysMoment 1 month ago