This is not a cylinder, it is recorded for the Gramophone & Typewriter Company. Who only made discs.
(You can hear from the rythm of the surface noise that this is not a cylinder, a cylinder rotates with 160 rpm, and the surface noise sounds very rytmic)
OMG ! This was my wedding theme song in 1972 then, since widowed and remarried, AGAIN in 1994, and at my daughters' 2007 wedding! AND played by Grieg HIMSELF??!!!!! UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!
Basically, I think great music can be played many ways and still sound good. And, this is certainly great music.
So don't criticize the composer... maybe he was playing it slightly (I highly doubt it was very much more) faster than he would have liked, or maybe not, we may never know, but still enjoy this for what it is, just the way you enjoy other people's performances!
@Theoshow2 - Mille fois ... MERCI !!! Un trésor!... Piano qui tranmet, ...Instrument merveilleux pour exprimer ce que l' âme et l' intelligence sécrètent dans leur Intimité...
Se possède, et ne se "vend" pas......... Évidemment plus saisissable, venant de sa propre composition...
@wks1978 Quite possible. The cylinder might have been running at an unnaturally high speed as well. It can also be a typical thing you see in when Claude Debussy plays the Claire de Lune faster than what the notes are later interpreted as.
This is of course a definitive version. However I think the Edgar Fairchild and Ralph Rainger recording with orchestra on Brunswick is good too and very impressive!
Old recordings and video play back faster than they were intended to. Just watch an old charlie chaplin video. It looks strange as the people are moving around at a fast and twitchy pace.
It's recorded in the tempo Grieg played it, but because of the limited time a record could hold, the pianist had to play faster, or as the case with Wedding Day of Trollhuagen, leave out parts from the piece to make it fit.
maximal duration of recordings in this time was three minutes not 1.53.
And please, if you don't believe me, try to play the first tone of the melody, it should be a c#2, but actually it's quite a bit higher (and they could already tune a piano in 1903).
I used to play this, as well as "Rustles of Spring" for my 8th grade piano recital--how "vidunderlig" (wonderful) to hear it from Grieg himself--I've been at his house in Bergen--beautiful
wow... this is really fast, to me it seems to fast, and takes away from the emotional parts. But thats just me, he wrote it. But as for me, I think I'll play it with a little more feeling and not so fast :p.
Well, this depends on whether it was a cylinder or disc recording. They DID have both 2-minute and 4-minute cylinders back then. If this is a 2-minute cylinder, he might have had to play it faster to make it fit, but a 4-minute cylinder would give him time to stretch out. Discs are another story again. Ask a phonograph or record collector about this topic, they would know more.
This is from a 1903 G&T recording (Gramophone and Typewriter)and was indeed "a disc" "transformingart" has uploaded a Victor repressing from it. Records in those days could only hold a certain recording time. That could be the reason for the faster tempo..although 2 minutes is really short. There's 3 minutes + recordings of that period (same label), so I think Grieg wanted it "this fast"
Is the speed not dictated by whatever setting the listener chooses on the machine? Or does that only apply to phonographs? There is evidence that performers did vary speeds though to accommodate the technological limitations of the day.
Grieg recorded 9 (G&T) gramophone records in Paris, spring 1903. The original speed might be 71,67 rpm (not 78, this standard came later on). These recordings where transferred to a CD, "Grieg spiller Grieg".
@sobie99 thank you for the insightful comment. I find this plenty decipherable and definitely emotional!
It's funny how people talk about the fast pace of modern-day life, and many old recordings (when they're played at the RIGHT SPEED) seem to imply that in some ways, people's brains must have gone a bit faster back then than they do today, if for no other reason than you need to think fast to catch all the nuances, but... THEY ARE THERE!!!
@sobie99 It's so funny, back then, people sometimes wrote these things that were beautiful pieces, with so many nice things going on in them, and then would play them at what we today would consider a fast tempo, since today it is de riguer for most pianists to take these kind of pieces slowly (or at least slower than this).
@sobie99 Granted, they did write slower tunes back then too. But I do believe part of the genius of these things is that the pretty bits only momentarily flash, they don't linger. You have to grab them out of the air as soon as they emerge, before they are replaced with something else. It takes sharp ears to do this.
@sobie99 I think today's practice of balladizing certain classical pieces definitely has its merits... it can reveal many riches!
BUT - there is a danger of "balladizing" everything until it turns into mush.
If the tune was written with fire and dash, or at least brio, or vim and vigor, (or sprightliness? liveliness?) that should always remain, unless you are deliberately trying to play it differently than the original manner.
Isn't that Albert Einstein?
TheSDMM 3 days ago
guys it is a phonograph/gramophone
TheIlikecookies123 3 weeks ago
disk, cylinder... is it so important? we have a great chance to listen to GRIEG!
bach5861 3 weeks ago
Thanks for uploading this!
gerardbedecarter 1 month ago
This is not a cylinder, it is recorded for the Gramophone & Typewriter Company. Who only made discs.
(You can hear from the rythm of the surface noise that this is not a cylinder, a cylinder rotates with 160 rpm, and the surface noise sounds very rytmic)
durekatt 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Metronome: half note with dot = 84.
Measures: 72 (6/4) including some "ritard.".
So, Grieg is correct, this is the right way to play this piece.
SuperOdoacre 2 months ago
Comment removed
SuperOdoacre 2 months ago
This recording probably was a 4 minute cylinder, but may have been squeezed into 2 minutes to make it faster.
achelgeson93 5 months ago
@achelgeson93 No it's a disc, in the catalogues and a disk. Read up...
JackRance1910 1 month ago
I would give my left nut for a concert with Grieg
Multibjarne 5 months ago 2
And here I thought I was playing it too fast!! Geez, Grieg, in a rush ey, but still very beautiful!
Spenelo 6 months ago
OMG ! This was my wedding theme song in 1972 then, since widowed and remarried, AGAIN in 1994, and at my daughters' 2007 wedding! AND played by Grieg HIMSELF??!!!!! UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!
kathicu109 6 months ago
Basically, I think great music can be played many ways and still sound good. And, this is certainly great music.
So don't criticize the composer... maybe he was playing it slightly (I highly doubt it was very much more) faster than he would have liked, or maybe not, we may never know, but still enjoy this for what it is, just the way you enjoy other people's performances!
KawhackitaRag 8 months ago
haaha i find it funny that we even have records of grieg playing :D haha
Agapeh7 8 months ago
@Agapeh7 I find it AMAZING that there are records of him playing... of course I have known of the piano rolls for years. This is really beautiful!
KawhackitaRag 8 months ago
@KawhackitaRag agreed! about grieg playing it too fast, I don't think he would have played it if he could not have played it the way he liked. ;D
Agapeh7 8 months ago
Comment removed
dnabiologic 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KawhackitaRag agreed! about grieg playing it too fast, I don't think he would have played it if he could not have played it the way he liked.
Agapeh7 8 months ago
Those 00's where a lot better than ours 00's.
lucasgelati 11 months ago 2
@Theoshow2 - Mille fois ... MERCI !!! Un trésor!... Piano qui tranmet, ...Instrument merveilleux pour exprimer ce que l' âme et l' intelligence sécrètent dans leur Intimité...
Se possède, et ne se "vend" pas......... Évidemment plus saisissable, venant de sa propre composition...
etiam161036 11 months ago
I find this too fast.
MrRagtimer 1 year ago
@MrRagtimer we can play it slower... it was 107 years ago....
heldenbariton 10 months ago
It sounds like Grieg is racing through this piece to squeeze it onto a 2 minute cylinder.
wks1978 1 year ago
@wks1978 Quite possible. The cylinder might have been running at an unnaturally high speed as well. It can also be a typical thing you see in when Claude Debussy plays the Claire de Lune faster than what the notes are later interpreted as.
lektrum 1 year ago
He must have really been playing at that speed because if this was playing back too fast the notes would sound higher.
Fellwander 1 year ago
How can I obtain these recordings ?
peacemaker083 1 year ago
This is of course a definitive version. However I think the Edgar Fairchild and Ralph Rainger recording with orchestra on Brunswick is good too and very impressive!
KawhackitaRag 1 year ago
Add &fmt=18 to the end for high quality!
thepts 1 year ago
thats quite a pretty good recording despite its age
uhartchristian 1 year ago
Sans comparaison aucune avec les rouleaux Welte Mignon ou Duo Art : là, on entend un artiste derrière le clavier... pas avec les rouleaux...
pianotonton 1 year ago
Thats cause Grieg wasnt a pussy-fag like all of these space age douche bags, and he knew when to go Ballz-out on the tempo.
Gargantupimp 1 year ago 3
Is this really Grieg playing?
paopaomanalansan 2 years ago
Yes.
thomase13 1 year ago
Where do they get such recordings?
paopaomanalansan 1 year ago
Old recordings and video play back faster than they were intended to. Just watch an old charlie chaplin video. It looks strange as the people are moving around at a fast and twitchy pace.
Non the less, very good! Love Griegs music!!
Brandotuomikoski 2 years ago
Whoa, this is fast. It's kind of scary.
springzhu 2 years ago
this sounds pretty good quality actualy, compared to those 1880's wax crap.
creamyfilling102 2 years ago
i cant believe that grieg plays here 'live' o_o ♥
aivyelisa 2 years ago
I know for sure when I go to college I am robbing the household lyric piece book...I just love love love it. amazing.
fashionandmusic921 2 years ago
this is really cool! its way faster than the way i played it..
LunaLovegood108 2 years ago 2
So Cool! I can hear Grieg play his own song !! i wish i have this recording!!!!
coolaudrey4567 2 years ago 3
lol this is sped up for sure :) you can hear it on the pianosound as well as on the cracking noise
blautraud 3 years ago
It's recorded in the tempo Grieg played it, but because of the limited time a record could hold, the pianist had to play faster, or as the case with Wedding Day of Trollhuagen, leave out parts from the piece to make it fit.
karlab75 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
blautraud 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
maximal duration of recordings in this time was three minutes not 1.53.
And please, if you don't believe me, try to play the first tone of the melody, it should be a c#2, but actually it's quite a bit higher (and they could already tune a piano in 1903).
blautraud 2 years ago
No, that would make the notes sound higher.
vysehrad 2 years ago
Amazing.. we can hear our beloved Grieg playing!!!!!!..
ilovescarlatti 3 years ago 4
fantastic (*)
gigi876 3 years ago 2
♫♪♫♪♫♥cute
pegsur 3 years ago
Beautiful. Grieg has long been a favorite composer of mine. A great writer if there ever was one.
Does anyone know if these recordings available anywhere? If so, I would love to get a copy.
professor501 3 years ago 2
Please! Grieg is playing his own works as it always has to be because he is the composer.
carvidi 3 years ago
A wonderful dramatic interpretation full of spring light at the end !!
allegroconmoto 3 years ago 2
Wow. He plays it fast. Maybe the record's sped up.
TheDopeMage 3 years ago 2
It's not sped up...
OurHighSchoolLolTeam 3 years ago
Well, he`s a great COMPOSER than. ;)
TheDopeMage 3 years ago 2
*then*
TheDopeMage 3 years ago
ya it is faster because this recording is so old.
carmenaudrey 3 years ago
I wonder if he has a youtube account in heaven. LOL!!!!!
pianoboypiano 3 years ago 2
wow...we are really listening to greig play?!?!?!?! that is awesome. and yes...he does play it a lot faster than others.
goodridgewinners 3 years ago 3
I think he plays it too fast. I play this peace too but i play it a little slower.
Anyway i enjoy playing and i love it..Spring is spring.
Great job Grieg
LoveLover5 3 years ago
He plays nice but i think its too fast.
I play this peace too and i play it a little slower. Not to much. Anyway i enjoy playing it, it is wonderful. :)
LoveLover5 3 years ago
I used to play this, as well as "Rustles of Spring" for my 8th grade piano recital--how "vidunderlig" (wonderful) to hear it from Grieg himself--I've been at his house in Bergen--beautiful
imafanindeed 4 years ago
i'm crying..
abbjorko 4 years ago
aww...thats beautiful :) it is a real treat/gem though, so i understand why.
goodridgewinners 3 years ago
wow... this is really fast, to me it seems to fast, and takes away from the emotional parts. But thats just me, he wrote it. But as for me, I think I'll play it with a little more feeling and not so fast :p.
shellshot 4 years ago
But HE'S PLAYING IT HIMSELF. I THINK IF HE WANTED IT SLOWER HE WOULD HAVE DONE SO.
pianoboypiano 4 years ago 3
Composers often do enjoy other people's interpretations that they themselves did not think of.
piano6861 4 years ago 16
it could be because of the recrding?
wogandmush 4 years ago
Well, this depends on whether it was a cylinder or disc recording. They DID have both 2-minute and 4-minute cylinders back then. If this is a 2-minute cylinder, he might have had to play it faster to make it fit, but a 4-minute cylinder would give him time to stretch out. Discs are another story again. Ask a phonograph or record collector about this topic, they would know more.
KawhackitaRag 3 years ago 7
This is from a 1903 G&T recording (Gramophone and Typewriter)and was indeed "a disc" "transformingart" has uploaded a Victor repressing from it. Records in those days could only hold a certain recording time. That could be the reason for the faster tempo..although 2 minutes is really short. There's 3 minutes + recordings of that period (same label), so I think Grieg wanted it "this fast"
sobie99 3 years ago
Is the speed not dictated by whatever setting the listener chooses on the machine? Or does that only apply to phonographs? There is evidence that performers did vary speeds though to accommodate the technological limitations of the day.
clemencie 2 years ago
Grieg recorded 9 (G&T) gramophone records in Paris, spring 1903. The original speed might be 71,67 rpm (not 78, this standard came later on). These recordings where transferred to a CD, "Grieg spiller Grieg".
star1923 2 years ago
Ok, Thanks I wasn't sure whether it was a phonograph or a gramophone recording. You have a great collection.
clemencie 2 years ago
Increasing the playback speed would make the notes sound higher.
vysehrad 2 years ago
@sobie99 thank you for the insightful comment. I find this plenty decipherable and definitely emotional!
It's funny how people talk about the fast pace of modern-day life, and many old recordings (when they're played at the RIGHT SPEED) seem to imply that in some ways, people's brains must have gone a bit faster back then than they do today, if for no other reason than you need to think fast to catch all the nuances, but... THEY ARE THERE!!!
KawhackitaRag 8 months ago
@sobie99 It's so funny, back then, people sometimes wrote these things that were beautiful pieces, with so many nice things going on in them, and then would play them at what we today would consider a fast tempo, since today it is de riguer for most pianists to take these kind of pieces slowly (or at least slower than this).
KawhackitaRag 8 months ago
@sobie99 Granted, they did write slower tunes back then too. But I do believe part of the genius of these things is that the pretty bits only momentarily flash, they don't linger. You have to grab them out of the air as soon as they emerge, before they are replaced with something else. It takes sharp ears to do this.
KawhackitaRag 8 months ago
@sobie99 I think today's practice of balladizing certain classical pieces definitely has its merits... it can reveal many riches!
BUT - there is a danger of "balladizing" everything until it turns into mush.
If the tune was written with fire and dash, or at least brio, or vim and vigor, (or sprightliness? liveliness?) that should always remain, unless you are deliberately trying to play it differently than the original manner.
KawhackitaRag 8 months ago
@KawhackitaRag Of course it is not a cylinder. It is a G&T commercial issue...
JackRance1910 1 month ago
@piano6861, Excellent comment.
advisorC101 1 year ago
Thanks for posting!
pianogirl98 4 years ago 2
Nice!!!! Loved it!
NeoComposer 4 years ago 2
Thanks so much for that - it was great!
llesmeiriol 4 years ago 2