Added: 2 years ago
From: SteornOfficial
Views: 29,338
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ seebey1 your comments about flourescent materials are incorrect. A flourescent material absorbs short wavelength high energy photons to promote an electron to a higher enegery level. This electron then relaxes back to its ground state, emitting a slightly lower energy and thus longer wavelenth photon. i.e you put in a UV photon and get out a lower energy visible photon. You do not gain energy from flouresence you loose it.

  • This entire structure is something i thought out completely within a couple of hours. I do not understand all the people with 2 normal magnets in such a structure. Of course you will need 1 normal, and 1 electro (1+1or similar), or at least be able to switch the magnetic field off at a certain moment when not using an electromagnet driven by a coil. It can be done in different ways, but... the point is: free energy is here and it is not difficult. This coil of them might be interesting though.

  • Well we certainly hope we can improve on Sean's demo model.

    He states that over a week, it produced "21 kiojoules of excess energy". Sound like a lot? 21 Kilojoules equates 5.8 watt-hours of energy. Ie. enough to power a 5 watt device for one hour, or a 25 watt light bulb for 15 minutes.

    And this from running his generator for a week! This generator has to run an entire month for every hour of use on a 25 watt light bulb.

  • he misspoke, if you look closley at his projector screen you will see typed out 21k kilojoules. so 21,000 kilojoules is a little bit under 6,000 watts. You could easily run your house of this.

  • @TheIgnoramus

    At 1:18 it pretty clearly says "21k Joules".

  • Lets just say its true and the energy out is over 100%.

    If its real it will take time to engineer a fully optimised system that works reliably.

    Sean states the efficiency will depend on physical and practical design. Meaning it probably cant self run today as a demo but when a manufacturer designs one from scratch and optimises every aspect.

    Lets wait until the third party calorimetry data is released before making judgement.

  • Lets wait IF the third party calorimetry data is released before making judgement.

  • Orbo technology is much like the effect of fluorescence A fluorescent material reflects both visible and ultraviolet light as visible light. So there appears more "light" coming off the surface than was incident.. That is why fluorescent things are so bright.

    Orbo takes some supplied energy, then draws extra from an unseen world also, outputting the sum.

    It is drawn from the hidden dimensions revealed in quantum mechanics (QM mandates 11+ dimensions of spacetime, we experience 3+1 only)

  • TIMECUBE

  • If they can generate energy at almost no cost (relatively), why don't they just sell it themselves?

    Or at least sell enough energy to live top wage life styles, then release the technology as an act of philanthropy .

  • Life is not only about status, what about helping the unity of all.

  • If you had free energy, you could cause massive damage with powerful forces, explosions etc.

    This must be free energy relative to mass, so, you can only make so much energy based on how big your device is.

  • wdkhukefue:

    Is it not massive damage on the oil coorp. bank account instead?

  • so why not run this with a capacitor instead of a battery ?

  • If this is over 300% efficient and even electrical overunity, then change the battery with a capacitor, and prove that the capacitor is gaining and not loosing energy stored.

  • would placing it in a vacuum chamber, increase efficiency?

  • @4optics yeah, it'd cut air friction. You'd also get efficiency from changing the rotor size, increasing magnet size/strength, supercooling the magnets, moving the output coil closer to the rotor, not building the thing out of clear plastic, etc.

  • Either - this doesn't work (like every other free energy device conceived by man) and the company are essentially conning people, OR

    They hold the key to free energy for the entire globe, but have decided to charge for it which I consider pretty evil. Basically.

  • OTOH, a tech company wouldn't be able to put a technology like this out without investors putting up some serious cash. Besides which, they said that they won't even charge developing countries.  How is this evil?

  • I disagree. Surely if you had the opportunity for gaining from your research, you would take it. Besides, products built with this technology will be inherently profitable for the company building them, even if a small percentage in licensing fees was directed towards Steorn. If it wasn't the case, it wouldn't make sense for Steorn's business model!!

    Anyway once people figure out why it works, they can improve it (420 pounds is not that much money!)

  • so if it has an 327% output efficiency it means that i can directly put it trough input and get massive ammount of rpm or infinite

    if i put 12 volt i get 39.24 volts if i understood that would be crazy

    :S

  • Comment removed

  • so when will the debate be over?

  • Will engineers be testing this equipment on a load?

  • Why not make it extremely simple. How many watts input? How many watts output?

  • because apparently it has more to do with how fast the rotor turns as well as how many rotors you have! If real, it would be unlimited, dependent on implementation. The ratio of 3:1 is a pretty good start though.

  • It's clear Steorn was never a Caesar's Palace act, but a scientific fraternity directly concerned with rigorous, tangible results. Therefore the science has always been ahead of slick presentation, but in this series they finally communicate, effectiively and convicingly. Without an engineering degree or self study, you're not going to get anything more.

  • EXCELLENT!!! I WANT TWO!!

  • Excellent,

    The second firing at 90 degrees. This is what many people waited to see; now we understand and have to accept this technology.

    Interesting times ahead!!

  • Sean, you said the electrical efficiency was 327%. Does that mean that Orbo keeps its own battery fully charged without outside input? And how do you avoid overcharging it you are returning to it more than three times what you draw?

  • Great question. I've also wondered if this machine gets "heavier" during production. If it's creating matter, it should be gaining mass incrementally.

  • Any excess energy would translate into an output current only if there were a load. Current doesn't flow without a load. So, minus charging the battery (which has a load if it is partially depleted), this energy is going to this load. At 3:27, the kinetic energy of the rotor is at least discussed as being turned into heat by the pickup coil, but that's a minor bit. I missed where/if he said how they provide a load for the excess output current.

  • The possibilities for this technology are limitless. Just watching this, I know how to get even more over unity out of the system.

    Steorn, you are doing a Great Job.

    I wish you nothing but success.

  • Thank You ,Please get this on the market to the public to buy.

  • How long before I can buy a car with one of these in place of an engine?

  • If it's real, then five years if you're rich, 10 years if you're not.

  • It has to be independently verified first.

  • Look at that sucker go.

    Eat it skeptics. Here are the numbers and hard data you were calling for.

  • Yumm, the numbers and hard data I was calling for!

  • Hmmmm...

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more