@bake3020 YEH! a religious person on a science channel, i'm loving these death knells. The reason why you people come to these channels is simple. Religion is intrinsically protective, in the face of inhalation you are compelled to protect your texts because they are written in a way to be protective, blackmailing you, using the Devil, sins, et al.
A fool gives full vent to his spirit, but a wise man quietly holds it back.
- Proverbs 29:11 And thats why we don't argue with you, Good day.
..does they ever read what they say... Black hole is infinitly small and then a a companion sun will make it grow..-> think.. its the eventhorizon that grows and gravity -not the Hole itself.- newscientist need newer scientist
The image of being slowly ripped apart, falling into oblivion, sounds poetic. Painful, yes, but quite a powerful way to die, leaving time itself and slipping into some deep lasting darkness.
the surface of water is two dimensional, yes? but a vortex created by a plug hole is a three dimensional phenominon. well that's what i think black holes are. gaps in the three dimensional fabric of space, creating a four dimensional vortex that we, being three dimensional, cannot fully appreciate. all i wonder is where it leads to.
If there is no evidence for the existence of particles faster than light, then we can "assertively" conclude that light is the fastest thing in the universe.
@sp4zzpp2 Due to gravity, your relative time is dilated to a limit of infinity. This causes everything outside of your relative time to appear to me moving infinitely fast.
Near-death-experiences are often described as "your life flashing before your eyes."
With such significant differences between your time and the external time, you would see the universe flash by to it's end
@in5secs well all black holes could coalesce into one gigantic one, but it would eventually fall apart because black holes give off energy and matter, slowly but they do. so eventually the universe would just once again restart.
Is there but one singularity and each black hole a doorway to that singularity? It makes no sense that whatever enters a black hole, is destroyed and no longer exists; it is more likely that this energy is recycled and could become new universes; a big bang in another dimension.
@rollsthepaul since when can we send shit outside our solar system? if a black hole was close enough that we could send a camera into we be fuuuuuuuucked
and what this guy said "Thing is: even Radiowaves or whatever you use to communicate with the cam will be sucked into the black hole. And that what makes this project senseless."
You would have to have connection with this cam to check on the data.
Thing is: even Radiowaves or whatever you use to communicate with the cam will be sucked into the black hole. And that what makes this project senseless.
I heard one theory for someone, falling into a black hole (brace yourself!!):
At first you'd feel a rather comfortable sensation of being stretched; then you're gonna be sucked in, meaning (because of the deformed space-time continuum) something like the Star Wars III's Tatooine traps: you'd experience eternal abscission of your body parts for thousands of years, getting worse and worse, at the same time slower and slower, the more time passes...
@Tressco Your eyes basically take a picture very often and shows it to your brain, which puts together all of the recent pictures to make a moving image. Because a black hole would slow everything down, your eyes would take these pictures less often, and your brain would process these images slower. You would also think slower resulting in it appearing as though everything is moving at a normal speed.
Jesus Christ is the only way to God! All who believe Jesus Christ died for their sins and rose again from the dead will have eternal life. Call upon the Lord Jesus Christ and believe in Him and you will be saved!
hi do who belives i think the universe is the work of god
does anyone agree. and is none other than the ALLAH swb the almighty sustainer of every thing
from the SEA TO THE TREE THE MOON TO THE SUN THE LORD OF THE STARS the most merciful we where created to bd tested ALLAH IS WHO CREATED THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH and everything beetwen it is whom knows what we know & what we dont praise be to ALLAH
This kind of constructive commentary and sophisticated rhetoric with such a clear contextual references is probably going to bring peace over all mankind. Thank you for these words of wisdom.
@Dazg10 this comment not only makes you a hypocrite but also explains that you are also terrible for being a user of the 'worst userbase on the internet'.
@ALAPAT1 vanish doesn't mean it is destroyed. Since the gravitational pull at the event horizon is larger than the speed of light we can never see the object after it has passed the boundary since light cant come back past the event horizon.
@ALAPAT1 I think that most everyone here is aware of Lavoisiere's law. It's just that you don't seem to fully understand neither what Conservation of Matter means, nor how black holes are proposed to work.
1. Matter can very well be destroyed - namely when it is being transformed into energy. See: nuclear reaction, matter/antimatter annihilation, etc. This is in perfect agreement with Lavoisier.
2. Quantum mechanics teaches us that matter can also be created by means that defy Conservation.
3. The above is just FYI, since black holes do not destroy matter, nor do they transform it into energy. They merely compress it, and remove it from our "cone of causality" by hiding it behind an event horizon. The matter is still there, having lost none of its mass. Neatly conserved for eternity.
"banish forever into the singularity" what? so the laws of physics do not apply to blackholes anymore? does that mean the total energy in blackholes are zero? does that mean matter will turn into anti-matter?
@fixingbraincell the laws of physics never applied to black holes. a singularity is outside the laws of physics. its more mass than should be able to exist in its given volume.
@Nullstr1ng It would be longer for about a nanosecond. Then it would immediately be ripped into its constituent molecules.
Sadly, no one will ever be able to experience what it feels like to fall into a back hole. You would be long dead before you would notice any relativistic changes to the universe around you. While the hole itself probably doesn't radiate much, the radiation from its accretion disk is said to be incredibly deadly.
Wow, okay. So as you're flying toward a black hole in deep space, most likely frozen and probably dead, you're best thought is to lunge at it crotch-first? While there definitely exists some more painful ways on making "things" longer, you'd better be quick to gloat about it within the 0 seconds you'll be conscious.
U r jumping to conclusions, using meagre information as a starting point, then letting your prejudices carry u the rest of the way. U should consider a career in academia - u will fit right in
@UserNamei5 lol yes but oh Well you knoW What a joke it is? no? then may be you need to add more things to listen in your life like your luagh, just joking dude :D
pure science fiction. Assumptions piled upon theories, built upon suppositions and in the end modelled in HD using flashy graphics and declared to be self evident. How many of u newscientist followers actually do real research? i mean real research, by yourselves, self-directed, not funded and administered and managed by an institution? hmm. thats what i thought. Now find out whos behind Newscientist if u care about knowledge.
@ouijaboy666 Wherever I've searched info on black holes on the Internet,in 95% of the cases they start with "It is assumed that;If we assume that etc..."I haven't seen anywhere to be said that this is solid evidence of the characteristics of a black hole.One thing is for sure,the info that they exist is true.
I don't have the funds nor the time to do real research,so I'm satisfied with what I can read,but I don't say that I believe it as the absolute truth.Chill dude,at least graphics are cool.
tell u where there is one black hole: mathematical physics. Money goes in and nothing of substance comes out. U don't need to have money to find out if the claims r true: those who make it up r supposed to offer proof. Instead, we go on a wild math goose chase while we try to fathom their models. MathPhysics is supposed to b a way of understanding nature. But u will end up spending all your time merely trying to understand mathphysics. Dont' confuse the explanans with the explanandum
@ouijaboy666 "MathPhysics is supposed to b a way of understanding nature. But u will end up spending all your time merely trying to understand mathphysics."
Well... we do understand it. Stop complaining just because you don't.
@tmtyler Not really pseudoscience, but just a label on information we do not yet know. Perhaps a new theory will arise from string theory... but for now we have no distance scale to use.
1. You do not need to divide by zero in order to get a singularity.
2. Irrespective of the above, it is very well permissible to divide by zero under specific circumstantces, in several scientific disciplines, including physics, and even pure mathematics. Though it is rare, it's not as forbidden as laymen like you believe.
3. If 100% of all scientists accept it as a fact, then it's not pseudoscience. Even if it turns out wrong, it's still a valid scientific concept.
@tmtyler Since you are not a scientist, you should inform yourself about the differences between "valid but wrong" and "pseudoscience". If a theory has been arrived at via the Scientific Method, then it is valid science, even if it later turns out to be wrong. True pseudoscience selectively ignores already established scientific concepts. Telepathy, acupuncture, homeopathy, Christian science, are examples of pseudoscience. Singularities are not.
@Timrath Pseudoscience is a claim, belief, or practice which is presented as scientific, but which does not adhere to a valid scientific methodology, lacks supporting evidence or plausibility, cannot be reliably tested, or otherwise lacks scientific status. Singularity beliefs lack supporting evidence - and cannot be reliably tested - and so neatly qualify as "pseudoscience".
@tmtyler Good job on coyping Wikipedia without acknowledging your source (once again, this shows that you are not a scientist).
Singularity does not qualify "neatly" as pseudoscience, since it only fulfills one of the criteria - namely that it cannot be "reliably tested." However, nothing in astrophysics can be reliably tested, so that criterion has traditionally been waived for that particular discipline.
As for evidence: you don't accept mathematical congruity as evidence?
@Timrath Only one? Extrapolating *far* beyond experimental evidence and a physical theory dividing by zero don't count as evidence for crackpottery, I suppose. Astrophysics is proper science - but singularities are junk science.
If you where ever to get close to a blackhole the strength of the gravity would actually tear you into pieces and you would enter as a thin line of matter
This is some well-presented, straight forward simply info about black holes. It may be too speculative for some, or too rudimentary, but I think it's great.
time is not as you infer , its relative to the measurement and constant to speed e a foot is a foot in what ever space matter is condensed and speed that dose not change time in a constant measured distance , ,the understanding of curved space (rotation) and time being measured in a curved it has difference periods and distances because of circumstance time is a straight line, matter how ever is not restrained by time it can change , can man
@questionsleadtotruth They are not tunnels, or holes. They were named "Black Holes" only because they look like holes. At the center of every black hole is a collection of infinitely condensed matter.
to push the envelope i think black holes may be responsible for the big bang. all matter is funnelled back to the beginning of time, and recycled.and that's all i have to say about that.
no i dont believe i am mis -imformed.i have been following this debate for quite sometime. about 30 years and there is no hard evidence just speculation from data. extrapolation is not fact. and many researchers agree that certain wavelenghs do escape and are also emitted. how else do you think that we can detect them.
what a lot of bull. the misinformation in this is riff. one not all light cannot escape. x- ray and other wavelenghts can. what little we do know is just theory. i hate the way these scientist promote their work as if it was absolute fact.
X-rays cannot escape from within the "event horizon" of any black hole, just like visible light cannot. What you're misinformed about is that when matter gets super heated close to a black hole, it starts to give off X-ray radiation. This, however, does NOT come from within the event horizon.
i feel lucky to be alive now, not 2000 years ago when everyone believed in religion. I can only imagine how awesome it will be living in 2000 years from now.
@redbeast2 That's a great observation. But, I was referring to the perspective of the hole in the flat surface at the bottom of that 3D sink. This hole doesn't need a surface to flow threw.
So eventually all the stars are going to get SUCKED up in the black hole...Then what? Will there be a universe of blackholes? Will they attract each other and then SUCK on each other? Like one big frikkin black hole, what's the difference between the black hole singularity and the big bang singularity?
past the event horizon everything is destroyed? but I don't understand this,
the laws of thermodynamics say nothing is created or destroyed, only transfered; so is it accurate to say black holes are destroying things?
if the video is assuming the object is an artifical object, like a space probe the statement makes sense - but funnily enough most things that are entering black holes are probably not man made atm.
what if 100 massive blackholes just happen to.... cross each other and consume each other until only one remains, would this one start to pull galaxies into it that are far away?? would it eat everything till theres nothing left!? WILL CHUCK NORRIS BE ABLE TO STOP IT!?!?!?!
Nothing new here, no puzzles answered. This is all old and well known information to most that are interested. Some animations where new or altered versions of previous animations, but that was all.
I've got tons of questions about this!. first, why does black hole GROW! when matters that falls into it vanishes?. if the black hole grows, so matters didn't just vanished, but rather compressed into some state of existence beyond quarks and to smallest possible form of matter?
@saleall well, the common idea is that the matter is still "there", in the center of the black hole. When more matter is pulled in, it adds the already present matter, thus making the hole "grow". Im not sure if the event-horizon grows accordingly, i.e making the hole grow visibly.
@saleall Because they don't "Grow" ...they get larger. For example when a whirlpool in water gets larger, it's not growing, but the water flow around the hole is increasing.
There is still nothing in the hole, and the water still didn't vanish.
I just came back from the black hole trip. Too bad noone from the past believes me (your present). In my time, youtube is only one branch of a much larger video site.
4:50 Time slows as you pass the event horizon and so you are SLOWLY ripped apart. and by the "time" you reach the point of where you should die, time slows further.
You never die, you are just put into a sense of extreme pain for eternity.
@scientolofag It only slows relative to an outside observer. Time dilation doesn't mean you experience slow motion, your mind slows down with everything else, which means you experience no slow down. You'll perceive yourself to be falling at break neck speed, and it'll be over fast. To an outside observer, you'll slow down and become part of the event horizon, never reaching the centre.
Who knows what happens when you get sucked into a black hole. Has anyone considered White Holes? They spit out matter as opposed to consuming it, maybe all black holes have a white hole that spits out the matter they consume. Man doesnt, and probably never will know what happens when something enters a black hole.
@Metaldude1945 I dont think that is possible. If a black hole was created in the hadron collider it would be near microscopic in size. It would dissapear almost instantly from "eating" itself because it wouldnt be able to "eat" enough mass to sustain itself. And when this video says small blackholes, it means small as in natural space ones formed by stars, not the extremely small ones like the collider ones which wouldn't even be able to exist out in space.
@bake3020 YEH! a religious person on a science channel, i'm loving these death knells. The reason why you people come to these channels is simple. Religion is intrinsically protective, in the face of inhalation you are compelled to protect your texts because they are written in a way to be protective, blackmailing you, using the Devil, sins, et al.
A fool gives full vent to his spirit, but a wise man quietly holds it back.
- Proverbs 29:11 And thats why we don't argue with you, Good day.
Firdaush0 1 month ago in playlist More videos from newscientistvideo
Black holes are scientific fantasies.
shaktir4u 2 months ago in playlist More videos from newscientistvideo
@shaktir4u Great - can you offer an alternative solution to the observed phenomena? With the maths, please.
FredPilcher 2 months ago
There is no proof of black holes...
chantaclear 8 months ago
..does they ever read what they say... Black hole is infinitly small and then a a companion sun will make it grow..-> think.. its the eventhorizon that grows and gravity -not the Hole itself.- newscientist need newer scientist
exxalte 9 months ago
I feal depressed after he explained what it would be like to go in to a black hole :(
tumbs up if you felt the same...
blueinckproductions 1 year ago
Just like your mom...
lol
blueinckproductions 1 year ago
Just like your moms...
lol
blueinckproductions 1 year ago
it would be realy cool if you combibne an antimatter black hole and an normal black hole
ruben307 1 year ago
Only two things are infinite. The universe, and human stupidity. (Einstein)
manganificent 1 year ago
great vid, now i know a lot more :)
admiralPs 1 year ago
The image of being slowly ripped apart, falling into oblivion, sounds poetic. Painful, yes, but quite a powerful way to die, leaving time itself and slipping into some deep lasting darkness.
wwfbook 1 year ago
isn't when we can see large masses of the matter coming out of the black hole called a quarzar?
pwnin12345 1 year ago
what happens when you enter the singularity is the real question.............
tom5343 1 year ago
@tom5343 i think it would rip you apart... wouldn't really matter were you end up then???
BrainBlowers 1 year ago
@BrainBlowers well obviously through Chuck Norris down and see what he says when he comes out lol
tom5343 1 year ago
cut what happens if you look up or down just before you enter the 'ring'? HUH? WHAT THEN, BOFFINS?
Destro7000 1 year ago
the surface of water is two dimensional, yes? but a vortex created by a plug hole is a three dimensional phenominon. well that's what i think black holes are. gaps in the three dimensional fabric of space, creating a four dimensional vortex that we, being three dimensional, cannot fully appreciate. all i wonder is where it leads to.
lygophile 1 year ago
@lygophile tell that to a scientist and you might just get a nobel
plinggotchi 1 year ago
@plinggotchi. i'm calling the patent office now. ;)
lygophile 1 year ago
My god, too many stupid comments
my head is going to explode
ThatsSoBS 1 year ago
@ThatsSoBS or implode
mrmagdziarek 1 year ago
@WhiteSerpentz No, you clearly don't
If there is no evidence for the existence of particles faster than light, then we can "assertively" conclude that light is the fastest thing in the universe.
ThatsSoBS 1 year ago
Research Nassim Haramein
Scarecrow0089 1 year ago
are black holes gonna cure cancer? NO OF COURSE NOT
amicusnemini 1 year ago
Besidesthe dieing part, wouldn't it he awesome to go into the singlearity?
TheDarkTetsuo 1 year ago
Fabric of space time is real? fucking awesome.
G3org3Master 1 year ago
Black holes scare me! :O
SUHAILKHAN03 1 year ago
Brilliant video!
Vortex42 1 year ago
Black hole == a division by 0 in the fabric of the Universe.
rafaelhsouza 1 year ago
Black holes are terribly interesting. This video, however, the polar opposite.
benner2000 1 year ago
how comes that falling into a black hole is described the same way like near-death-experiences?
sp4zzpp2 1 year ago
@sp4zzpp2 Due to gravity, your relative time is dilated to a limit of infinity. This causes everything outside of your relative time to appear to me moving infinitely fast.
Near-death-experiences are often described as "your life flashing before your eyes."
With such significant differences between your time and the external time, you would see the universe flash by to it's end
do0me0nice 1 year ago
Cheers for the vid, most interesting!
mamolian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that's a good one :)
PlayGenSeriousGames 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol there are 5 people who don't believe in black holes!
Jansper 1 year ago
So, if at least one Black Hole's activity doesn't cease, it will swallow everything that there is in the whole Universe?
When I mean whole, I'm considering that the Universe is limited (for the smartasses that would come trolling after).
in5secs 1 year ago
@in5secs well all black holes could coalesce into one gigantic one, but it would eventually fall apart because black holes give off energy and matter, slowly but they do. so eventually the universe would just once again restart.
doomsday1157 1 year ago
@doomsday1157 restart is not an accurate representation of what will likely happen to the universe. Look up heat-death
do0me0nice 1 year ago
@in5secs NO, Black hole activities will always cease because every black hole will eventually evaporate and dissipate back into space.
ThatsSoBS 1 year ago
@bake3020 did you not see the video? the collapse of very dense stars will produce a black hole.
metadaptation 1 year ago
greats video def new scientists best since i subscribed
knivesron 1 year ago
Every time I hear the term "black hole" I think of Neil Tyson DeGrasse orgasming about the spaghettification process. XD
Bobbiethejean 1 year ago
Point of no return? Are you sure it's not a time machine in space?
Vincebandicot521 1 year ago
Is there but one singularity and each black hole a doorway to that singularity? It makes no sense that whatever enters a black hole, is destroyed and no longer exists; it is more likely that this energy is recycled and could become new universes; a big bang in another dimension.
rollsthepaul 1 year ago
@rollsthepaul since when can we send shit outside our solar system? if a black hole was close enough that we could send a camera into we be fuuuuuuuucked
and what this guy said "Thing is: even Radiowaves or whatever you use to communicate with the cam will be sucked into the black hole. And that what makes this project senseless."
michu070 1 year ago
but tey cant answer the big one. why dont they send a monkey camera through one finally. HELLO?
Ratama 1 year ago
@Ratama
You would have to have connection with this cam to check on the data.
Thing is: even Radiowaves or whatever you use to communicate with the cam will be sucked into the black hole. And that what makes this project senseless.
BloodyBBQ 1 year ago
*sigh* Listen. I'm gonna make this clear to the very small portion of the internet watching this:
Black doesn't always mean skin!
I know, I know. It may take some time to sink in, but it will make sense soon enough.
Honestly, is there going to be a colour spectrum with red, yellow, blue, green, white, and african-american?
TehZorzGuy 1 year ago
i doubt that light is the fasting thing in the universe. maybe on earth it is, but not in the universe.
theanzer 1 year ago
@theanzer it's the fastest thing in the universe.
metadaptation 1 year ago
I heard one theory for someone, falling into a black hole (brace yourself!!):
At first you'd feel a rather comfortable sensation of being stretched; then you're gonna be sucked in, meaning (because of the deformed space-time continuum) something like the Star Wars III's Tatooine traps: you'd experience eternal abscission of your body parts for thousands of years, getting worse and worse, at the same time slower and slower, the more time passes...
Tressco 1 year ago 3
@Tressco Your eyes basically take a picture very often and shows it to your brain, which puts together all of the recent pictures to make a moving image. Because a black hole would slow everything down, your eyes would take these pictures less often, and your brain would process these images slower. You would also think slower resulting in it appearing as though everything is moving at a normal speed.
virgildog1950 1 year ago
i don't like black holes, is a name too racist :p
Faustoteinmor 1 year ago
@Faustoteinmor if black pple is all u think about when u hear the word black then that makes u racist.
mathdude28 1 year ago
@Faustoteinmor I agree. I call them afro-american holes.
MastermindX 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jesus Christ is the only way to God! All who believe Jesus Christ died for their sins and rose again from the dead will have eternal life. Call upon the Lord Jesus Christ and believe in Him and you will be saved!
JesusPaid4You 1 year ago
i just cant understand black holes but i love science and time
Lucky466 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hi do who belives i think the universe is the work of god
does anyone agree. and is none other than the ALLAH swb the almighty sustainer of every thing
from the SEA TO THE TREE THE MOON TO THE SUN THE LORD OF THE STARS the most merciful we where created to bd tested ALLAH IS WHO CREATED THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH and everything beetwen it is whom knows what we know & what we dont praise be to ALLAH
videosmalls 1 year ago
2:09 "stars dust, and dark matter" so has the existence of dark matter been proven conclusive now?
ragnarocks0 1 year ago
time does not exist.
DiogoE6 1 year ago
@DiogoE6 Then you don't exist.
Hatchwork 1 year ago
Jesus Christ, you people are fucking stupid, I swear, YoutTube has one of the worst userbases on the internet.
Dazg10 1 year ago 39
@Dazg10
This kind of constructive commentary and sophisticated rhetoric with such a clear contextual references is probably going to bring peace over all mankind. Thank you for these words of wisdom.
celljackingjr 1 year ago 7
@Dazg10 I don't know... have you seen Yahoo! Answers yet? :D
But you're right, there are some really dumb people here, spamming the world with their useless opinions.
Timrath 1 year ago
@Dazg10 this comment not only makes you a hypocrite but also explains that you are also terrible for being a user of the 'worst userbase on the internet'.
nickhashair 1 year ago
@nickhashair nice fallacy brosef.
Dazg10 1 year ago
@Dazg10 I doubt that the userbase for youtube is any more stupid than the userbase for facebook
do0me0nice 1 year ago
@Dazg10 Collegehumor and [rule 1 and 2] have worse userbases.
cxgamer 1 year ago
@Dazg10 Thats cause it practicaly has the largest userbase on the internet, lol.
RezDisciple 1 year ago
@Dazg10 And its obvious to me you dont think very much of yourself, and to many you saying this is kind of ironic
blazednlovinit 1 year ago
0:47
Wtf...haven't you ever heard of the Law of Conservation of Matter, that states that matter can't be created or destroyed?
ALAPAT1 1 year ago
@ALAPAT1 vanish doesn't mean it is destroyed. Since the gravitational pull at the event horizon is larger than the speed of light we can never see the object after it has passed the boundary since light cant come back past the event horizon.
flotsamthespork 1 year ago
@ALAPAT1 then its not destroyed... it's displaced.
ImHomeAtLast 1 year ago
@ALAPAT1 Wow are you an idiot...
Hatchwork 1 year ago
@ALAPAT1 I think that most everyone here is aware of Lavoisiere's law. It's just that you don't seem to fully understand neither what Conservation of Matter means, nor how black holes are proposed to work.
1. Matter can very well be destroyed - namely when it is being transformed into energy. See: nuclear reaction, matter/antimatter annihilation, etc. This is in perfect agreement with Lavoisier.
2. Quantum mechanics teaches us that matter can also be created by means that defy Conservation.
Timrath 1 year ago
3. The above is just FYI, since black holes do not destroy matter, nor do they transform it into energy. They merely compress it, and remove it from our "cone of causality" by hiding it behind an event horizon. The matter is still there, having lost none of its mass. Neatly conserved for eternity.
Timrath 1 year ago
"banish forever into the singularity" what? so the laws of physics do not apply to blackholes anymore? does that mean the total energy in blackholes are zero? does that mean matter will turn into anti-matter?
fixingbraincell 1 year ago
@fixingbraincell the laws of physics never applied to black holes. a singularity is outside the laws of physics. its more mass than should be able to exist in its given volume.
falsepod 1 year ago
scary .. what would it be really like to fall into a black hole .. T_T
my dcik will be longer anyway .. :))
Nullstr1ng 1 year ago
@Nullstr1ng It would be longer for about a nanosecond. Then it would immediately be ripped into its constituent molecules.
Sadly, no one will ever be able to experience what it feels like to fall into a back hole. You would be long dead before you would notice any relativistic changes to the universe around you. While the hole itself probably doesn't radiate much, the radiation from its accretion disk is said to be incredibly deadly.
Timrath 1 year ago
@Nullstr1ng
Wow, okay. So as you're flying toward a black hole in deep space, most likely frozen and probably dead, you're best thought is to lunge at it crotch-first? While there definitely exists some more painful ways on making "things" longer, you'd better be quick to gloat about it within the 0 seconds you'll be conscious.
TehZorzGuy 1 year ago
Black Holes suck ...
Poolshrrrk 1 year ago 23
@Poolshrrrk they suck oneway and blow the other
crateos 1 year ago 3
@Oxydox
U r jumping to conclusions, using meagre information as a starting point, then letting your prejudices carry u the rest of the way. U should consider a career in academia - u will fit right in
ouijaboy666 1 year ago
...and this can be used to rescue people.
kekkokekko89 1 year ago
@UserNamei5 lol yes but oh Well you knoW What a joke it is? no? then may be you need to add more things to listen in your life like your luagh, just joking dude :D
Ralkila 1 year ago
pure science fiction. Assumptions piled upon theories, built upon suppositions and in the end modelled in HD using flashy graphics and declared to be self evident. How many of u newscientist followers actually do real research? i mean real research, by yourselves, self-directed, not funded and administered and managed by an institution? hmm. thats what i thought. Now find out whos behind Newscientist if u care about knowledge.
ouijaboy666 1 year ago
@ouijaboy666 Wherever I've searched info on black holes on the Internet,in 95% of the cases they start with "It is assumed that;If we assume that etc..."I haven't seen anywhere to be said that this is solid evidence of the characteristics of a black hole.One thing is for sure,the info that they exist is true.
I don't have the funds nor the time to do real research,so I'm satisfied with what I can read,but I don't say that I believe it as the absolute truth.Chill dude,at least graphics are cool.
Mishakis 1 year ago
@Mishakis
tell u where there is one black hole: mathematical physics. Money goes in and nothing of substance comes out. U don't need to have money to find out if the claims r true: those who make it up r supposed to offer proof. Instead, we go on a wild math goose chase while we try to fathom their models. MathPhysics is supposed to b a way of understanding nature. But u will end up spending all your time merely trying to understand mathphysics. Dont' confuse the explanans with the explanandum
ouijaboy666 1 year ago
@ouijaboy666 "MathPhysics is supposed to b a way of understanding nature. But u will end up spending all your time merely trying to understand mathphysics."
Well... we do understand it. Stop complaining just because you don't.
FrSIBYLA 1 year ago
@ouijaboy666 why would they lie? u sound paranoid.
breaneainn 1 year ago
I think new scientist realized its audience consists of 95% morons, therefore moved to solve these 'puzzling' questions for them...
rommel241 1 year ago 2
All i heard was...
SUPER MASSIVE BLACK HOLE..
Lachy101 1 year ago 3
@Lachy101 Yo momma? XD
Timrath 1 year ago
these are primary school facts
clanOT 1 year ago
The singularity is pseudoscientific nonsense. Physics does not divide by zero. Only in incorrect *theories* of physics does that happen.
tmtyler 1 year ago
@tmtyler Not really pseudoscience, but just a label on information we do not yet know. Perhaps a new theory will arise from string theory... but for now we have no distance scale to use.
BenjaminFranklin2u 1 year ago
@tmtyler
1. You do not need to divide by zero in order to get a singularity.
2. Irrespective of the above, it is very well permissible to divide by zero under specific circumstantces, in several scientific disciplines, including physics, and even pure mathematics. Though it is rare, it's not as forbidden as laymen like you believe.
3. If 100% of all scientists accept it as a fact, then it's not pseudoscience. Even if it turns out wrong, it's still a valid scientific concept.
Timrath 1 year ago
@tmtyler Since you are not a scientist, you should inform yourself about the differences between "valid but wrong" and "pseudoscience". If a theory has been arrived at via the Scientific Method, then it is valid science, even if it later turns out to be wrong. True pseudoscience selectively ignores already established scientific concepts. Telepathy, acupuncture, homeopathy, Christian science, are examples of pseudoscience. Singularities are not.
Timrath 1 year ago
@Timrath Pseudoscience is a claim, belief, or practice which is presented as scientific, but which does not adhere to a valid scientific methodology, lacks supporting evidence or plausibility, cannot be reliably tested, or otherwise lacks scientific status. Singularity beliefs lack supporting evidence - and cannot be reliably tested - and so neatly qualify as "pseudoscience".
tmtyler 1 year ago
@tmtyler Good job on coyping Wikipedia without acknowledging your source (once again, this shows that you are not a scientist).
Singularity does not qualify "neatly" as pseudoscience, since it only fulfills one of the criteria - namely that it cannot be "reliably tested." However, nothing in astrophysics can be reliably tested, so that criterion has traditionally been waived for that particular discipline.
As for evidence: you don't accept mathematical congruity as evidence?
Timrath 1 year ago
@Timrath Only one? Extrapolating *far* beyond experimental evidence and a physical theory dividing by zero don't count as evidence for crackpottery, I suppose. Astrophysics is proper science - but singularities are junk science.
tmtyler 1 year ago
very interesting and educative
thank you
Shketri 1 year ago
If you where ever to get close to a blackhole the strength of the gravity would actually tear you into pieces and you would enter as a thin line of matter
juicenburg 1 year ago
Probably the best video I've ever seen from New Scientist. It was informative and very straightforward.
ScientificKnowledge 1 year ago 2
This is some well-presented, straight forward simply info about black holes. It may be too speculative for some, or too rudimentary, but I think it's great.
DrakeMagnum 1 year ago
Five black hole puzzles answers get from another shows since 1970.we know the same
MrYonomequejo 1 year ago
time is not as you infer , its relative to the measurement and constant to speed e a foot is a foot in what ever space matter is condensed and speed that dose not change time in a constant measured distance , ,the understanding of curved space (rotation) and time being measured in a curved it has difference periods and distances because of circumstance time is a straight line, matter how ever is not restrained by time it can change , can man
OrphanPaper 1 year ago
I cant but ponder that black holes are wormholes to somewhere, sometime. They are abviously tunnels but we just have no idea to what exactly....
questionsleadtotruth 1 year ago
@questionsleadtotruth They are not tunnels, or holes. They were named "Black Holes" only because they look like holes. At the center of every black hole is a collection of infinitely condensed matter.
jiberish001 1 year ago
@questionsleadtotruth white holes
z3253304 1 year ago
No puzzles answered here, sorry -1
RamiAtrash 1 year ago 4
repost
DrSifilis 1 year ago
what puzzles were answered in this video? all of it has been well established and known for a long time...
Ramsez 1 year ago 3
help us Chuck Norris
MisterCoqui 1 year ago 2
This could be used.... to kill everythang
lm108 1 year ago
damn nature, you scary
AVerbene 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
I think the world economy experiencing the effect of black hole :)
falcon02012 1 year ago
@falcon02012 the Amish will be laughing their butts off in a few decades when were all dead. ahh ha ha ha ha
Sc0ttPrian 1 year ago
The merging of singularities must be one for the most epic events in the universe.
AntiProtonBoy 1 year ago
to push the envelope i think black holes may be responsible for the big bang. all matter is funnelled back to the beginning of time, and recycled.and that's all i have to say about that.
Zendishwasher1 1 year ago
no i dont believe i am mis -imformed.i have been following this debate for quite sometime. about 30 years and there is no hard evidence just speculation from data. extrapolation is not fact. and many researchers agree that certain wavelenghs do escape and are also emitted. how else do you think that we can detect them.
Zendishwasher1 1 year ago
@Zendishwasher1 Clearly, you are misinformed. redbeast2 explained it to you. I suggest you read it again.
TheLegendarySkeptic 1 year ago
@WhiteSerpentz
"A tachyon is a hypothetical subatomic particle... no experimental evidence for the existence of tachyon particles has been found"
redbeast2 1 year ago
blackholes? more like ASSholes :D
glenbruce 1 year ago
Perhaps trillions of years form now, black holes could be an accidental solution to our rapidly growing universe.
spot0914 1 year ago
what a lot of bull. the misinformation in this is riff. one not all light cannot escape. x- ray and other wavelenghts can. what little we do know is just theory. i hate the way these scientist promote their work as if it was absolute fact.
Zendishwasher1 1 year ago
@Zendishwasher1
X-rays cannot escape from within the "event horizon" of any black hole, just like visible light cannot. What you're misinformed about is that when matter gets super heated close to a black hole, it starts to give off X-ray radiation. This, however, does NOT come from within the event horizon.
redbeast2 1 year ago
Fuck yes, who needs religion when our real world has these fuckers?
CozmoNz 1 year ago
This is also what happens when you divide by zero.
raven50x 1 year ago
This is more interesting than the optical illusions hands down.
raven50x 1 year ago
i feel lucky to be alive now, not 2000 years ago when everyone believed in religion. I can only imagine how awesome it will be living in 2000 years from now.
ashtool 1 year ago
I'm not afraid of black holes. We have Chuck norris.
filipe3x 1 year ago
I wouldn't compare it with a sink simply because it give people a false two-dimensional perspective.
GrimSoul66 1 year ago
@GrimSoul66 awesome comment.
Zendishwasher1 1 year ago
@GrimSoul66
A sink is 3 dimensional ಠ_ಠ
redbeast2 1 year ago
@redbeast2
but the sinkhole is not ;)
melis256 1 year ago
@redbeast2 That's a great observation. But, I was referring to the perspective of the hole in the flat surface at the bottom of that 3D sink. This hole doesn't need a surface to flow threw.
GrimSoul66 1 year ago
So eventually all the stars are going to get SUCKED up in the black hole...Then what? Will there be a universe of blackholes? Will they attract each other and then SUCK on each other? Like one big frikkin black hole, what's the difference between the black hole singularity and the big bang singularity?
TurboDally 1 year ago
past the event horizon everything is destroyed? but I don't understand this,
the laws of thermodynamics say nothing is created or destroyed, only transfered; so is it accurate to say black holes are destroying things?
if the video is assuming the object is an artifical object, like a space probe the statement makes sense - but funnily enough most things that are entering black holes are probably not man made atm.
AzzaRudd 1 year ago
@AzzaRudd
By "destroyed" he means the structures are disassembled. The INFORMATION is destroyed. See: Entropy.
DanielRI02 1 year ago
@DanielRI02 in that case destroyed is still a misleading word in my opinion
AzzaRudd 1 year ago
@AzzaRudd Because past the event horizon is nothing. Meaning even the law of thermodynamics doesn't exist
trotroy 1 year ago
@trotroy they do exist but tend to break down and how would we know for sure, again speculation presented as fact.
Zendishwasher1 1 year ago
This is what's formed when you divide by zero...
yellowmetalcyborg 1 year ago
@yellowmetalcyborg OH SHI-
schr4nz 1 year ago
what if 100 massive blackholes just happen to.... cross each other and consume each other until only one remains, would this one start to pull galaxies into it that are far away?? would it eat everything till theres nothing left!? WILL CHUCK NORRIS BE ABLE TO STOP IT!?!?!?!
shadowace421 1 year ago
WHY! does everyone say black holes "suck"?!
they don't "suck" any more than any other body in the universe does.
PLEASE STOP SAYING THAT BLACK HOLES SUCK!
nyyght7 1 year ago
@nyyght7 They don't suck. They pull with high gravity. Some people are just beeing silly.
Charlymaumushi 1 year ago
Nothing new here, no puzzles answered. This is all old and well known information to most that are interested. Some animations where new or altered versions of previous animations, but that was all.
N3CR1S 1 year ago
@N3CR1S agreed
yellowmetalcyborg 1 year ago
So this is what you get when you feed a troll.
AtomicKennen 1 year ago
finaly a good documentary
admiralPs 1 year ago
I've got tons of questions about this!. first, why does black hole GROW! when matters that falls into it vanishes?. if the black hole grows, so matters didn't just vanished, but rather compressed into some state of existence beyond quarks and to smallest possible form of matter?
saleall 1 year ago
@saleall well, the common idea is that the matter is still "there", in the center of the black hole. When more matter is pulled in, it adds the already present matter, thus making the hole "grow". Im not sure if the event-horizon grows accordingly, i.e making the hole grow visibly.
N3CR1S 1 year ago
@saleall Because they don't "Grow" ...they get larger. For example when a whirlpool in water gets larger, it's not growing, but the water flow around the hole is increasing.
There is still nothing in the hole, and the water still didn't vanish.
BenjaminFranklin2u 1 year ago
I just came back from the black hole trip. Too bad noone from the past believes me (your present). In my time, youtube is only one branch of a much larger video site.
bodinian 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
i love happy endings ^^
mickderkskouta 1 year ago
waste... what new , NEW scientist.
kamalmichael 1 year ago
.... with a very happy ending!! LOL
atheistonly 1 year ago
4:50 Time slows as you pass the event horizon and so you are SLOWLY ripped apart. and by the "time" you reach the point of where you should die, time slows further.
You never die, you are just put into a sense of extreme pain for eternity.
How's that for a good-night story?
scientolofag 1 year ago
@scientolofag It only slows relative to an outside observer. Time dilation doesn't mean you experience slow motion, your mind slows down with everything else, which means you experience no slow down. You'll perceive yourself to be falling at break neck speed, and it'll be over fast. To an outside observer, you'll slow down and become part of the event horizon, never reaching the centre.
coolman9999uk 1 year ago 3
Two people lost their mind in a black hole and thumbed down this video!
atheistonly 1 year ago
Weeeeeee!!!! That was fun!
cuptow555 1 year ago
Who knows what happens when you get sucked into a black hole. Has anyone considered White Holes? They spit out matter as opposed to consuming it, maybe all black holes have a white hole that spits out the matter they consume. Man doesnt, and probably never will know what happens when something enters a black hole.
Oradnal 1 year ago
@Oradnal There's one thing we know: whatever comes into the black hole, stays inside. So no white holes.
MastermindX 1 year ago
Superman is a singularity, because his density limits infinite.
sweYoda2 1 year ago
1:47 The large hadron collider? Anyone?
Metaldude1945 1 year ago
@Metaldude1945 I dont think that is possible. If a black hole was created in the hadron collider it would be near microscopic in size. It would dissapear almost instantly from "eating" itself because it wouldnt be able to "eat" enough mass to sustain itself. And when this video says small blackholes, it means small as in natural space ones formed by stars, not the extremely small ones like the collider ones which wouldn't even be able to exist out in space.
JACEH123 1 year ago