With the Bill Henson thing you have to keep in mind is that the art is not the photo itself but the response that it evokes. So the issue of 'art crossing the line' is nonsensical for this debate. There is certainly artistic merit in his work and it is not pedophilia.
The method he used to find models is he hung around primary schools, and asked children if they would like to participate. Then he asked the parents consent.
If u ask me, the difference between art and pron is in the eye of the beholder and in the definition of the dictionary. But I haven't seen the art work myself, so I won't openly judge beyond that.
You two really can't lie to a five year old and get away with it. Sorry, maybe next time you might get past.
The photo I offered to take... they took it down so unfortunately, I can't get it to you. Sorry! Cheers guys,
eh i dont think its porn, coz the kids dont seem to be posed or made up sexually...i mean i have life drawing classes at school which are painting posed naked women and that's not porn =/ i think they taking it more seriously coz the kids are young...but then again, shouldnt they have like parent permission or something o__o yeh thats my 2c haha
Anything can be pron depending on whos looking I dont find the picture arousing at all It's a grey area, even the cops havent charged anyone as yet
It's definitely art and the artist does have the parents' consent But the question whether they can give consent on behalf of their kids is another question that I don't have an answer for I'm more concerned with the kids posing for these things and then regretting it in the future when they fully understand the ramifications
lol 4chan
DeJase1 3 years ago
rules 1 and 2 guys
djtechnomonkey13 3 years ago
WHAT THE FUCK?! CAN HAS NEW VID?!
OhThePain111 3 years ago
hahahaha 5 stars
walnutplanet69 3 years ago
you guys make me laugh. Funny.
queenie0111 3 years ago
With the Bill Henson thing you have to keep in mind is that the art is not the photo itself but the response that it evokes. So the issue of 'art crossing the line' is nonsensical for this debate. There is certainly artistic merit in his work and it is not pedophilia.
psycropticunt 3 years ago
that is the shitst thing i have ever seen u fucking dickheads. just go and die
dogboyswithcameras 3 years ago
thanks jack you dickhead
TwoGuysOneChannel 3 years ago
Hahaha thats alright anytime, I don't even think it was me who commented, a lot of people use this account.
dogboyswithcameras 3 years ago
Lol. I like your Pro-Bill Henson Video.
You obviously are pretty passionate. =)
TwoGuysOneChannel 3 years ago
War in Iraq? Nationalism? Bush?
TwoGuysOneChannel 3 years ago
please zoom out, Illias's fface takes up over half the screen.
as for Bill henson:
if consent was given by parents and children alike then its art and theres no way he should be arrested.
CeriHutton 3 years ago
The method he used to find models is he hung around primary schools, and asked children if they would like to participate. Then he asked the parents consent.
TwoGuysOneChannel 3 years ago
Baked wallaby? Fried wombat? Boiled koala?
MustafaPresents 3 years ago
OOOHHH ... I can't wait for the cooking ! Bring on the Vegemite
junkienet 3 years ago
If u ask me, the difference between art and pron is in the eye of the beholder and in the definition of the dictionary. But I haven't seen the art work myself, so I won't openly judge beyond that.
You two really can't lie to a five year old and get away with it. Sorry, maybe next time you might get past.
The photo I offered to take... they took it down so unfortunately, I can't get it to you. Sorry! Cheers guys,
pez!
shikishinobi 3 years ago
You guys just made me not want to be a vegetarian but anyway AWESOME.
Um... PORN.
Jeanorules 3 years ago
how are old r they?
54321emb 3 years ago
anywere from 10-16
TwoGuysOneChannel 3 years ago
eh i dont think its porn, coz the kids dont seem to be posed or made up sexually...i mean i have life drawing classes at school which are painting posed naked women and that's not porn =/ i think they taking it more seriously coz the kids are young...but then again, shouldnt they have like parent permission or something o__o yeh thats my 2c haha
crayonpainting 3 years ago
True, but these are photographs not drawings, and in the wrong hands could be used as pornography.
But still a good point.
Thanks :D
TwoGuysOneChannel 3 years ago
yeah i see the part about being in the wrong hands...eww
but then same goes for any nude photography i suppose
crayonpainting 3 years ago
Anything can be pron depending on whos looking I dont find the picture arousing at all It's a grey area, even the cops havent charged anyone as yet
It's definitely art and the artist does have the parents' consent But the question whether they can give consent on behalf of their kids is another question that I don't have an answer for I'm more concerned with the kids posing for these things and then regretting it in the future when they fully understand the ramifications
it'll be up to lawyers
monotonehell 3 years ago
It is also not widely distributed. Bill Hensons work would have probably gone under the radar if it wasn't for the online release.
smalltime0 3 years ago
porn
Drooldog 3 years ago
australian cooking delights?
whats that just vegemite lol
pedophiliac art yea i dont think ill do that
LOl fuckin awesome dudes
metallicamonkey 3 years ago
No you misunderstood, vegimite AND fosters beer in a jar then drained over some oysters and snags.
TwoGuysOneChannel 3 years ago
ah forgive me master (bows)
sounds... delicious
metallicamonkey 3 years ago
LOL. douches.
hihihihi0987 3 years ago