Creatards don't understand shit about probability or measure spaces or quantum mechanics. The "probability" (however that is defined, exactly, for nearly-continuously moving atoms) of any specific snapshot out of ALL possible other configs is zero. That just means the Lebesgue measure of points is zero: that practically follows from the definition of how Lebesgue sigma-algebras are set up. Instead, quantum mechanics forces us to talk about probs of a range of locations and momenta of particles.
Don't pander to the audience TF: if they (and of course I mean creationists) don't understand that the definition of probability itself, and hence its computed value, depends upon the probability space from which one samples, and don't understand factorials, then tell them tough shit: just proceed without going through the basics for them. I like to see them squirm.
What are the chances the sperm that created YOU happened to make it to your mother's egg? If a different sperm would've made it, would you have been a different person? What were the odds of the folks who were onboard the hijacked airliners during September 11th 2001 and not some other flight? What are the odds you get to have sex with the woman of your dreams and create the perfect child, the one who grows up to be an NFL quarterback, making millions? The point here: Probability is meaningless.
Wait a minute.... How exactly does one calculate the chance of finding a winning lottery ticket on the ground? First you would have to calculate the odds of winning the lottery. Easy enough, assuming that all lotteries have an equal chance to win (they don't, but whatever). Then you would have to calculate the chances of dropping a lottery ticket, given you had one that was winning (This is incalculable. It isn't a mathematical problem, it is a situational one. )
It also seems to me you're saying things must exist someway so it simply just formed the way it is... Oh ho! Well that explains everything.... we see materials forming machines all the time... thinking biological things can do things material things can't just because they're alive and have dynamics is far-fetched indeed, only happens in the imagination. Just show me a dog producing a non-dog, that's the only proof I'm waiting for.
In any case, biological things are alive. Therefore it is possible for them to reproduce, and to survive, which is, ya know, the KEY PART of evolution.
Clocks do not live. They therefore do not survive, and therefore do not reproduce.
A dog producing a "non-dog" would not be proof of evolution. It would be proof we are in a Ancient Greek myth if anything. This is like asking for a thunderstorm to create a robot to prove electricity
@nathanprindler Oh yes, "but where did the laws come from" Maybe if you wasn't a pathetically moronic subhuman, you would be able to understand that. Fuck, even a 10min read on wikipedia can tell you alot about such things, but you're not even smart enough to know that. And you think evolution happens instantly? HAHAHA, Honestly,0 you should be gassed.
Um, so your only fallback is the laws must have made everything... so how does that explain how the laws came to be? Saying they "just are the way they are, no explanation" is naturally taking a stance that they made themselves and is no more logical an explanation that "God did it." Any fifth grader knows looking at the world around that things don't make themselves... cause and effect: A cause must be greater than its effect, something greater than the laws and the universe must have caused it
The funny thing is the problem these people have is they think if evolution occurred the ecosystems of the world would be unstable. Well the unstable ones died and only stable ones were left so of course we are here!
Evolution is based on mutation. Mutation is random and often gives an negative effect. But sometimes it increases the chance of making a lot of offspring. Or in other words better survival. That will let those with the better chance of surviving make lots of offspring and they will spread and maybe the offspring mutates positive and so on.
Humans have made dogs good ''friends'' that can work with humans with the help of choosing the ones with best hair or aggressivety or maybe cuteness.
The young guy who is sitting in his bedroom is scary. I want to put 10$ on him being in court with the defence of "God told me to do it", sometime in the next 10 years!
Kent Hovind is in jail because he was trying to warn the world that their is a dark agenda out there that aims at destroying the morality of every man woman and child making them into beasts. In fact Darwinism states that we evolved from mere beasts. God says you should hold your head up because you have been given free will by an all powerful all wise and all loving Creator. Jesus answered "Woe to them who worship the Created (Monkeys/Primates) rather then the Creator."
The ball clearly always falls in the same direction and rate of acceleration because of Intelligent Falling, you heathens. Not your so-called Theory of Gravitation, which I stress to point out is "only a theory", whatever that means.
I want to see if I understand this correctly- the idea here is that, regardless of improbabilities, the end result has to take a certain form, and that where we are now is essentially the form that beat out all the rest, not by chance but by adaptation.
Whereas creationists would probably bleat the same thing if we end up very differently in another form based on chemical, physics-influenced factors?
@KajexFiredrake I think the point was, the creationist’s conclusion is still awful when wrongly assuming evolution works through chance alone.
It is comparable to a man finding 85 ordinary 6 sided dice on the ground, he calculates the probability of the dices orientations to be less than 1 in 10^65. And concludes because this probability is so low GOD must have place the dice.
You could even apply the concept of quantum tunneling to this. For example, our sun is not hot enough to consistently ensure nuclear fusion. However, at the quantum level, if something is possible (despite high improbability) it will happen.
Just because it is highly improbable by chance, it will still occur.
2 weeks ago, a couple of christian promoters came along the door and they told me about the improbability of our DNA being formed ''by accident'' I started a debate and told `m everything I learned from this video 3 weeks ago, they walked away.. in anger ^^ best feeling ever :D
@saavykaas your not so saavy bekaas you offer nothing new under your looney tune evolutionists silliness. Your a silly person who believes in rocks that said to be millions of years old through carbon dating, which has been proven again and again not to be very accurate at all. Hidding under your rocks does not prove anything an evolutionists says is any truer.
@PTKPiper maybe you should do a little research carbon dating isn't used to date rocks but of course your a creationist and you wouldn't know that,I highly recommend you do some more research on evolution and science in general from reliable sources ( answers in genesis is not a reliable source)
@mimarp478 I don't like debating with people who believe their ancestors are apes. Carbon dating has been and is still used to date fossilized bones (what I call is rocks, bones, whatever). Genesis was written thousands of years ago and still stands the test of time. It has accurately described how the earth and our planet life was created. The more we uncover though discovery, the more support creationist have to show how accurate the bible is. Evolutionist have had more loss ground.
@PTKPiper "I don't like debating with people who believe their ancestors are apes"
you should argue with people who accept evolution then.
"Carbon dating has been and is still used to date fossilized bones"
thats is just false. carbon dating is not used on anything over 60,000 years old. and always when something is being dated, min. of 12 different methods are used. (if one contradicts the others, they discard the object)
@OmfgItsHenu I have to disagree with you here about carbon dating, you need to go back and do more research yourself on this subject like I have and you will see that is exactly what scientist mainly have used and still use today to determine the age of fossils with it. Sorry your wrong.
@PTKPiper Carbon dating? Used for the determination of the age of fossils? Sure, provided they are not older than 50000 years, which it the extreme end of the current calibration curve...
@PTKPiper I have to disagree with you somewhat. It's true that Carbon Dating is still used today but it is not the main method that the scientific community uses as there are several more reliable methods such as radiometric dating.
@PTKPiper " I don't like debating with people who believe their ancestors are apes" in science you don't believe you accept or not and once again we share a common ancestor with "apes" and sorry to break it to you but you are a ape we all are "Carbon dating has been and is still used to date fossilized bones" true but only fossils going back 60.000 years ago noting more
@PTKPiper (2) con "Genesis was written thousands of years ago and still stands the test of time. It has accurately described how the earth and our planet life was created". but how do we know its all true it could have all been simply made up please explain your reasoning "The more we uncover though discovery, the more support creationist have to show how accurate the bible is. Evolutionist have had more loss ground."
really? from i have seen new finds every day are supporting evolution
That is funny, last time I checked Jesus Christ has my soul. Jesus also destroyed the works of the devil for those who believe. As a believer, I bind you, you demon of confusion. Let this person go in the mighty name of Jesus.
We´re not coincidense. We´re a result of events that were more likely to happen than others. Also it was bound to happen sometime somewhere, so here we are. Period!
The creationist argument that it is too improbable for us to be here without having a god put us here directly implies that the likelihood of that god actually existing would also be just as improbable as even the most improbable event imaginable.Their argument condemns them further,because it implies that the likelihood/chance of us being here now is almost infinitely improbable.This should look familiar,because it's the same argument commonly used against evolution."It's nothing but chance."
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS FOR CREATIONISM-EVOLUTIONISM DEBATE (See Subchapter 10.2.2, Chapter 10, of Part Two.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Funny thing, your doing the same thing with you evolution religion. Like I said in my earlier comment whatever other arguments you have are irrelevant. The odds are still better for christians belief than an atheist. Throwing mud my way does not not make your case any more relevant, anyone with a half a brain can see this.
@PTKPiper Firstly, never said I was an atheist. Don't put words in my mouth. Secondly, wrong again. Learn math. There are an infinite amount of religions that could have you suffering in some sort of hell because you believe in your christian god. Those same religions would leave me alone or exalt me for not being a douche to others. The odds are in my favor once more. Thirdly, "throwing mud" sounds like slinging mud, an idiom that describes an ad hominem attack. You insulted my intellect. Fail?
What is funny, evolution can not be proven in the real world. Evolution is make believe for adults who will forever look for a non existing missing link. They spend their time trying to prove there is no God and do a very bad job trying to do it.
@PTKPiper So stupid. You insult those who believe in evolution for doing exactly what those with religious faith do... only there's more evidence in science.
@lordslothsavior You still do not get it. If your talking about bad science, yes there is a lot of it. We can agree to disagree. According to science theories when you die you nothing happens, we both win here. If there is a God when you die you go to heaven or hell according to christian faith, according to my faith I go to heaven, I still win. The odds are better on my side of the argument either way regardless if you believe or not believe, it is irrelevant.
@PTKPiper Well done. You've turned all of the spiritual questioning over the afterlife into a false dilemma. "Are christians or atheists right?" There are plenty of faiths that punish the non-believers, so you could say that you have better odds than me, but it's less a 50/50 and more of a 1/infinity ratio. Translation: You're no more right than primitive mud-people who said you'd be eaten eternally by worms while conscious if you didn't believe in their mud-god. No god would be a punishing ass.
@lordslothsavior a side note, the Rise of the Apes is a great movie to watch. I enjoyed watching the atheist ancestors rise to power in it. I highly recommend it for the entertainment value.
@PTKPiper On a side note, please learn to spell and use grammar. The hardest part of having a conversation with a religious person isn't that they stop any argument with faith in the unproven; it's the almost universal lack of skill you have in the English language.
@lordslothsavior sorry didn't realize this was a spelling bee or a grammar test halfwit. Who in the hell said I was a religious person. Last time I checked being a "christian" and being a "religious person" are two different things. As for the rest of your unimpressive rebuttal, no comment.
@PTKPiper It's obviously not and I didn't imply that it was. I observed that it's hard to have a conversation with someone when you struggle to understand them. Then you call me a halfwit for showing more effort in getting my point across; I say effort because you're either being lazy or you don't have a strong grasp on English. Christianity is a religion. People that belong to religions are religious people. I didn't even say christian in my second comment. And you refuse to continue. Pathetic.
@lordslothsavior Christianity is a relationship with God in my eyes and not a religion. I think I understand your point of view on that. Like I said earlier, we can agree to disagree. You have your belief system and I have mine. I don't think we are going to change our view points any time soon.
I will admit that some Christian make the rest of us Christians look like a bunch of apes, no pun intended. For what it is worth, I take back calling you a halfwit (or jerk).
@PTKPiper Thank you. I apologize for losing my temper. Agreeing to disagree is usually the best and kindest outcome that people with differing views on important issues can come to, so I'm happy to leave it there. :)
@PTKPiper Well you creationist haven't done a stellar job on proving the existence of god ether . We have scientific research with facts. All you have is book written thousands of years ago. A book that was based entirely on superstition and fables.
@420gma Evolution is a fable for those who believe in bogus science. You say "we have scientific research with facts" is NOT true, if it was how come all your facts are somehow part of the "missing link". This video is so a bad example to debate over coming from a creationist view point, which is by far a more sane understanding of how the earth was created. Evolutionist is just looking for away to justify away to say there is no God, which all of mankind knows there is a God.Romans 1:18-25
@PTKPiper You call scientific facts bogus simply because you don't want to believe it. Show me physical proof that god exists ! All you have is quotes from a book that is thousands of years old.As for the missing link we will fund it in time.
@PTKPiper sane? in what way is believing an all powerful being that popped everything into existence spontaneously and magically a sane thing to believe? lmao you probably think the earth is less then 10,000 years old don't you, go back under your bridge.
@ELEMENTSFAN666 is the mark of the beast. Funny you are siding with the evolutionist yet you have the 666 that the bible says in the mark of the beast. Hum....
Pipers pick pecks of pickled peppers. Funny how you are posting on a message board as well; you must be very skilled to pick peppers (in pecks, no less) simultaneously.
Bible quotes and references have effect only if you actually place value on what that book has to say; the only thing you've done is quote something. This is the same as me referencing Looney Tunes to describe the physics of gravity or the behavior of coyotes. I can do it, but it means nothing to anyone else.
just a few videos to begin... "Quantum Awakening - Have Scientists Found God? " "Scientific Evidence that God is real! " "*Quantum Physics* The Reality As You Know It Does Not Exist " "The God Theory " "Modern Science Finds GOD " "Evidence of God: Physics " "Stephen Hawking, Logical and Scientifically Proof of a possible Creator God " "Stephen Hawking: Life in the Universe " "Then where did God come from? (Carl Sagan) " "Life after death conclusion on CNN"
@truthseeker010101 Well first of all if scientific evidence really showed that god was real, it would have been on the frekkin NEWS, so I'll not even look into that. Please stop being a troll:( Make funny pictures instead=)
@Cyllid but seriously, are you denying the Big Bang ? Are you denying Science? Are you denying Physics? Becuase these are where I got this. It's Science, you must not be familar with science, I suggest you study it sometime.
@truthseeker010101 And no, you're not getting what you got from science. You take what scientists have said, and you have twisted it, to fit what you think is there.
The Big Bang is not proof of God, the first law of thermodynamics, any law of thermodynamics, does not prove God. At best you have the case for a Deist God, and if you're going to have a God like that, why not just shorten it one step.
@Cyllid "Quantum Awakening - Have Scientists Found God? " "Scientific Evidence that God is real! " "*Quantum Physics* The Reality As You Know It Does Not Exist " "The God Theory " "Modern Science Finds GOD " "Evidence of God: Physics " "Stephen Hawking, Logical and Scientifically Proof of a possible Creator God " "Stephen Hawking: Life in the Universe " "Then where did God come from? (Carl Sagan) " "Life after death conclusion on CNN" Start here
@truthseeker010101 Actually bro, that was a laugh of derision. That you thought that I hadn't heard of any of these, and moreso that you thought that they were actually persuasive towards your point. You listed Carl Sagan as part of your support for your position. You clearly didn't understand him.
@Cyllid I understand Carl Sagan perfectly, I love Carl Sagan. He was looking for proof of god, me too! He could never fully prove God but he loved God. If you look closly you can see the artist signature. Carl
and Hindu religion is the only relgion whitch mathced science! CArl, he also experiemneted in cananbis and wrote a paper, me too! I have a lot in commen with carl, I love CArl, please dont presume to tell me what I know when YOU didnt even watch the video! PONCE
@truthseeker010101 And I have seen that video. And if you think that Carl Sagan, OR Stephen Hawkings can be used to support a personal God (without heavy quote mining), you REALLY don't understand them or their works, or their words..
@Cyllid It's more then ONE video, There are over 1000 scriptures, around 600,000 verses. And then we have science, the amount of study needed is beyound you I guess. : )
@truthseeker010101 Says the idiot that can't even spell beyond with a spell-check. The science is not beyond me, but obviously it's beyond you. What you want me to believe is not science, and is not supported by science without you/other people intentionally twisting it, and making it fit.
You can go ahead and respond, but unless you say something actually moderately intelligent, I won't be. (and no, claiming I'm just ignorant and need to educate myself, is not moderately intelligent.)
@truthseeker010101 Yeah, I don' argue about the numbers of scriptures, but I would however feel somewhat insulted if I would let the scriptures of Will Shakespear, with a total count of 31,534 words (not counting each twise) guide me as a human being. Ergo: Why are your made up words better than any other? Also, you do not have any science, none at all.
I cannot believe you have the audacity to accuse me of Scientific ignorance, when you actually believe that Plastics are the cause of people being born gay.
I'm done with you, and if you can't figure out why... wow. Research a little bit better.
@Cyllid Hahahahahaha awesome. No one else spells lawl that way. Two hoots for you. And it's amazing that I can't tell when someone is truly religious or trolling :D
1) If they say to you, where have you come from? Say to them, we have come from the light, from the place where the light came into being by it, established it, and appeared in their image. If they say to you, Is it you? Say, We are its children, and we are the chosen of the living Father. If they ask you, what is the evidence of your Father in you?' say to them, 'It is motion and rest. Jesus
@IseeRightThrough2you yeah, and the fracton displayed to be 1 / 1 trillion is is really 1/1 quadrillion. or whatever follows a trillion...maybe a bullshitillion?
I'm not really opposed to this video or any other in the series but at :45 seconds the actual video says for a thousand years, 2:12 Thunderf00t says a million years. I don't know if this was a legitimate mistake or not but I've always believed you don't need to change facts to refute creationism, creationists do that pretty well all by themselves.
well. its a paradox (ish), every inteligent being in the universe are there by chance. well yeah. think of the infinit size of the universe. and the amounts of trys the universe had , mabey 3 000 000 000 000 trys to spawn life in a second. who the fuck knows man. egos are what makes humans stupid. we are staring the oodds in the face and are not accepting that we are the chosen ones. lol . and doing things about it. no we are being stupid , doing stupid human things.
@MeepullStewray what? i think later in this series he actually explains it to u. Don't watch these things to attempt to prove him wrong when he already has proven u wrong.
Ah! Apparently, Kent Hovind & Venomfangx are science editors for Bill O'Reilly & his Faux News colleagues. Where are the FCC, NIST & the NSF when you need 'em?
I really like how you insult the man concerning his personal preference about what kind of women he likes and claim he is judging people as if judging people is wrong in your mind, yet you turn around and call him a pervert and that he likes little boys and think nothing of it.
As if it gives you any right to be able to judge the guy because you think he did it first, unless you like hypocrisy.
All of this is pure BS. His Exalted Noodliness, in a night of drunken debauchery, created the heavens and the earth. I'd be happy to spend the time to convert Mr. Thunderfoot over a plate of sumptuous, perfectly prepared spaghetti topped with divine sacred sauce and a nice bottle of rum. Arrrrrr.
@trampledone Only a fool would say in his heart thier is no God. If you searched for the truth to your questions yo would find them but instead you choice to be ignorant. I could not be you
@truthseeker010101 only fools believe that god exists, just dreamers and wishful thinking makes u believe in this fairy tale and you call me fezz, thats like a god believer to call people names that doesnt believe in your magical sky daddy and imaginary friend.
@trampledone aww, did I hurt your feelings? I said "All right fezz" when you said "Your a ignoorant fucktard, good day" . Sounds to me like your delusional! You judge people and you condemn them, you insult them and you mock them, but im the unGodly one! I prefer not speaking to people like you. Please go away!
@trampledone "i love women with big feet mmmm." WTF man! Your judgeing people while your profile page annoucninces you love feet? You like looking at porn and little girls from a quick view of your comments on youtube. Good luck with that
@trampledone The Bhagavad Gita written 3700 years ago by Khrishna, and told in stories from Noah in 4990 BC over 7000 years ago. tells of evolution and its part in the path of life. Why is it that life is explained but people fail to read the knowledge? Are you to busy?
the whole unlikelihood that the DNA would form in a certain way actually HELPS evolution. human and chimps share a 98% genetic similarity, that means that you have to multiply 10^65 and 98. those are much bigger odds of a DNA sequence to repeat, now what's more likely? that god randomly made DNA to fall in that order or that we shared an ancestor with chimps and the DNA differentiated with time and mutations over billions of years.
Albert Einstein: * A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death. * I believe in Spinoza's God, Who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God Who concerns Himself with the fate and the doings of mankind.
How is it that hardly any major religion has looked at science and concluded, 'This is better than we thought! The Universe is much bigger than our prophets said, grander, more subtle, more elegant?' Carl Sagan
If you believe in the theory of multiverse, in some universe, in some place,in some time theres a infinite chance of michael jackson being alive
Smokemalboro 22 hours ago
Yeah, but saying that "we are here arn't we?" is circular reasoning at it's worst!
xXsakkelaoXx 2 days ago
Creatards don't understand shit about probability or measure spaces or quantum mechanics. The "probability" (however that is defined, exactly, for nearly-continuously moving atoms) of any specific snapshot out of ALL possible other configs is zero. That just means the Lebesgue measure of points is zero: that practically follows from the definition of how Lebesgue sigma-algebras are set up. Instead, quantum mechanics forces us to talk about probs of a range of locations and momenta of particles.
mphello 2 days ago
Don't pander to the audience TF: if they (and of course I mean creationists) don't understand that the definition of probability itself, and hence its computed value, depends upon the probability space from which one samples, and don't understand factorials, then tell them tough shit: just proceed without going through the basics for them. I like to see them squirm.
mphello 2 days ago
What are the chances the sperm that created YOU happened to make it to your mother's egg? If a different sperm would've made it, would you have been a different person? What were the odds of the folks who were onboard the hijacked airliners during September 11th 2001 and not some other flight? What are the odds you get to have sex with the woman of your dreams and create the perfect child, the one who grows up to be an NFL quarterback, making millions? The point here: Probability is meaningless.
NowKillYourself 4 days ago
I wanna make pebbles :D
MeteoricIndigo 6 days ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Uh... Thunderfoot....the probability of placing an object in a square on a grid of 8x8 is 1 in 64, not 1 in 100. But yeah...I get it.
METRATR0N 2 weeks ago 3
The best bit: "evolved by chance".
Artwich 2 weeks ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
1:35 probloblility
Jelubaful 3 weeks ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Wait a minute.... How exactly does one calculate the chance of finding a winning lottery ticket on the ground? First you would have to calculate the odds of winning the lottery. Easy enough, assuming that all lotteries have an equal chance to win (they don't, but whatever). Then you would have to calculate the chances of dropping a lottery ticket, given you had one that was winning (This is incalculable. It isn't a mathematical problem, it is a situational one. )
pngwn56 3 weeks ago
Btw, why aren't the laws "evolving?"
It also seems to me you're saying things must exist someway so it simply just formed the way it is... Oh ho! Well that explains everything.... we see materials forming machines all the time... thinking biological things can do things material things can't just because they're alive and have dynamics is far-fetched indeed, only happens in the imagination. Just show me a dog producing a non-dog, that's the only proof I'm waiting for.
nathanprindler 3 weeks ago
@nathanprindler
This isn't a comprehensive evolution video.
In any case, biological things are alive. Therefore it is possible for them to reproduce, and to survive, which is, ya know, the KEY PART of evolution.
Clocks do not live. They therefore do not survive, and therefore do not reproduce.
A dog producing a "non-dog" would not be proof of evolution. It would be proof we are in a Ancient Greek myth if anything. This is like asking for a thunderstorm to create a robot to prove electricity
pngwn56 3 weeks ago
@nathanprindler Oh yes, "but where did the laws come from" Maybe if you wasn't a pathetically moronic subhuman, you would be able to understand that. Fuck, even a 10min read on wikipedia can tell you alot about such things, but you're not even smart enough to know that. And you think evolution happens instantly? HAHAHA, Honestly,0 you should be gassed.
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 week ago
Um, so your only fallback is the laws must have made everything... so how does that explain how the laws came to be? Saying they "just are the way they are, no explanation" is naturally taking a stance that they made themselves and is no more logical an explanation that "God did it." Any fifth grader knows looking at the world around that things don't make themselves... cause and effect: A cause must be greater than its effect, something greater than the laws and the universe must have caused it
nathanprindler 3 weeks ago
@nathanprindler cause and effect doesn't always work when it comes to quantum theory.
robokill387 3 days ago
The funny thing is the problem these people have is they think if evolution occurred the ecosystems of the world would be unstable. Well the unstable ones died and only stable ones were left so of course we are here!
1zacster 3 weeks ago
Evolution is based on mutation. Mutation is random and often gives an negative effect. But sometimes it increases the chance of making a lot of offspring. Or in other words better survival. That will let those with the better chance of surviving make lots of offspring and they will spread and maybe the offspring mutates positive and so on.
Humans have made dogs good ''friends'' that can work with humans with the help of choosing the ones with best hair or aggressivety or maybe cuteness.
FelixErikson 1 month ago
Yeah, evolution is just an accident. It's RANDOM CHANCE.
Just like water flowing downhill is RANDOM CHANCE.
rkyeun 1 month ago 8
@rkyeun y arent you top comment? lol brilliant!
guineapiggyman 2 weeks ago
he says every week for a 1000 years, not a million ;)
aarondude0 1 month ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
@aarondude0 yes but what thunderf00t was talking about when he said a million was different from the other person.
Hazethebassist 4 weeks ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
i continued to find the winning ticket on the street for the last 29 years.
And i'm only 20 :O
RustlessPotato 1 month ago
The young guy who is sitting in his bedroom is scary. I want to put 10$ on him being in court with the defence of "God told me to do it", sometime in the next 10 years!
MrSelidor7 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Kent Hovind is in jail because he was trying to warn the world that their is a dark agenda out there that aims at destroying the morality of every man woman and child making them into beasts. In fact Darwinism states that we evolved from mere beasts. God says you should hold your head up because you have been given free will by an all powerful all wise and all loving Creator. Jesus answered "Woe to them who worship the Created (Monkeys/Primates) rather then the Creator."
JamesRideout123 1 month ago
I wanna make pebbles too therefore I am God.
YevonZ 1 month ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Saying evolution is all random is like saying casinos are rich because of pure chance. Little bias, HUGE effect.
ddrddrddrddr 1 month ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists? 36
Conservative Christian Logic: watch?v=2Fa9_VsM5Bk
csmcmillion 1 month ago
The ball clearly always falls in the same direction and rate of acceleration because of Intelligent Falling, you heathens. Not your so-called Theory of Gravitation, which I stress to point out is "only a theory", whatever that means.
Teeg32 2 months ago
GOD CREATES EVOLUTION; EVOLUTION CREATES MAN; MAN DESTROYS GOD.
EGMAG 2 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
@EGMAG In Soviet Russia, god created man.
Ingmatter 2 months ago
@Ingmatter Soviet Russia, .<<
god created man through evolution
EGMAG 2 months ago
I want to see if I understand this correctly- the idea here is that, regardless of improbabilities, the end result has to take a certain form, and that where we are now is essentially the form that beat out all the rest, not by chance but by adaptation.
Whereas creationists would probably bleat the same thing if we end up very differently in another form based on chemical, physics-influenced factors?
KajexFiredrake 2 months ago
@KajexFiredrake I think the point was, the creationist’s conclusion is still awful when wrongly assuming evolution works through chance alone.
It is comparable to a man finding 85 ordinary 6 sided dice on the ground, he calculates the probability of the dices orientations to be less than 1 in 10^65. And concludes because this probability is so low GOD must have place the dice.
bradkey98765 2 months ago
@KajexFiredrake Yes
2point7etc 1 month ago
A true liar
johnnyjtuber 2 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
This has been flagged as spam show
A must watch: watch?v=rW_2lLG9EZM
Singh13saab 3 months ago
What are the chances of something happening that has happened?
1:1?!
P0weredByPie 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These two videos which cannot be refuted, exposes Evolutionism as the Atheist Lie and Atheist Religion that it is.
youtube . com/watch?v=51hWyBKX9Xs
youtube . com/watch?v=Pi1Foiz6kqE&feature=related
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 3 months ago
You could even apply the concept of quantum tunneling to this. For example, our sun is not hot enough to consistently ensure nuclear fusion. However, at the quantum level, if something is possible (despite high improbability) it will happen.
Just because it is highly improbable by chance, it will still occur.
daneblan 3 months ago
2 weeks ago, a couple of christian promoters came along the door and they told me about the improbability of our DNA being formed ''by accident'' I started a debate and told `m everything I learned from this video 3 weeks ago, they walked away.. in anger ^^ best feeling ever :D
lucasvandam 3 months ago
THE LAWS OF PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY, BIOLOGY AND SURROUNDING FACTORS DECIDE WHAT ATOM GOES WHERE.
(THIS IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS VIDEO)
straighter100 3 months ago
I have just watched why do people laugh at creationists? 1 to 8 and this is by far my favorite. Part 9 here I come!
Q2SEEDSMAN 4 months ago
Lol, trying to debunk evolution fact by using science, fucking hilarious.
angelusmortis1412 4 months ago
@ABPitcher am not trolling, but doing a little fishing.
PTKPiper 4 months ago
:-)
PTKPiper 4 months ago
One day we will all know the truth here. I pray you all find the truth sooner than later or better the truth seeks you out.
PTKPiper 4 months ago
@PTKPiper u trollin bro
ABPitcher 4 months ago
One day we WILL ALL know to truth one way or another. I pray you find this out sooner than later.
PTKPiper 4 months ago
@saavykaas Poe is a silly and an insane man. His law is for ignorant people who can not make an informed decisions for themselves.
PTKPiper 4 months ago
@saavykaas your not so saavy bekaas you offer nothing new under your looney tune evolutionists silliness. Your a silly person who believes in rocks that said to be millions of years old through carbon dating, which has been proven again and again not to be very accurate at all. Hidding under your rocks does not prove anything an evolutionists says is any truer.
PTKPiper 4 months ago
@PTKPiper maybe you should do a little research carbon dating isn't used to date rocks but of course your a creationist and you wouldn't know that,I highly recommend you do some more research on evolution and science in general from reliable sources ( answers in genesis is not a reliable source)
mimarp478 4 months ago
@mimarp478 I don't like debating with people who believe their ancestors are apes. Carbon dating has been and is still used to date fossilized bones (what I call is rocks, bones, whatever). Genesis was written thousands of years ago and still stands the test of time. It has accurately described how the earth and our planet life was created. The more we uncover though discovery, the more support creationist have to show how accurate the bible is. Evolutionist have had more loss ground.
PTKPiper 4 months ago
@PTKPiper "I don't like debating with people who believe their ancestors are apes"
you should argue with people who accept evolution then.
"Carbon dating has been and is still used to date fossilized bones"
thats is just false. carbon dating is not used on anything over 60,000 years old. and always when something is being dated, min. of 12 different methods are used. (if one contradicts the others, they discard the object)
OmfgItsHenu 4 months ago
@OmfgItsHenu I have to disagree with you here about carbon dating, you need to go back and do more research yourself on this subject like I have and you will see that is exactly what scientist mainly have used and still use today to determine the age of fossils with it. Sorry your wrong.
PTKPiper 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PTKPiper "you will see that is exactly what scientist mainly have used and still use today to determine the age of fossils with it."
i wasnt arguing with that, of course they still use carbon dating. among other methods of course.
but carbon dating isnt used on anything over 60,000 years old.
thats when the core becomes so small that the age is extremely hard to determine.
OmfgItsHenu 4 months ago
@PTKPiper Carbon dating? Used for the determination of the age of fossils? Sure, provided they are not older than 50000 years, which it the extreme end of the current calibration curve...
For the rest you need radiometric dating.
TomFynn 4 months ago
@PTKPiper I have to disagree with you somewhat. It's true that Carbon Dating is still used today but it is not the main method that the scientific community uses as there are several more reliable methods such as radiometric dating.
drums4b 3 months ago
@PTKPiper " I don't like debating with people who believe their ancestors are apes" in science you don't believe you accept or not and once again we share a common ancestor with "apes" and sorry to break it to you but you are a ape we all are "Carbon dating has been and is still used to date fossilized bones" true but only fossils going back 60.000 years ago noting more
mimarp478 4 months ago
@PTKPiper (2) con "Genesis was written thousands of years ago and still stands the test of time. It has accurately described how the earth and our planet life was created". but how do we know its all true it could have all been simply made up please explain your reasoning "The more we uncover though discovery, the more support creationist have to show how accurate the bible is. Evolutionist have had more loss ground."
really? from i have seen new finds every day are supporting evolution
mimarp478 4 months ago
That is funny, last time I checked Jesus Christ has my soul. Jesus also destroyed the works of the devil for those who believe. As a believer, I bind you, you demon of confusion. Let this person go in the mighty name of Jesus.
PTKPiper 4 months ago
We´re not coincidense. We´re a result of events that were more likely to happen than others. Also it was bound to happen sometime somewhere, so here we are. Period!
geyza0711 4 months ago
Lol @ the one clip at the beginning saying evolution says we're accidents, and I said back, "God tells you your a failure" hahaha
chrism4n14 4 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Comment removed
TheArbitraryName 4 months ago
The creationist argument that it is too improbable for us to be here without having a god put us here directly implies that the likelihood of that god actually existing would also be just as improbable as even the most improbable event imaginable.Their argument condemns them further,because it implies that the likelihood/chance of us being here now is almost infinitely improbable.This should look familiar,because it's the same argument commonly used against evolution."It's nothing but chance."
Balthazzarr 4 months ago
It's obvious that the universe was created using the Heart of Gold.
Butzopower 4 months ago
you say a millions years in the video, but truth be told; the actually footage says a thousand years
maegzz81 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (Donated) For Debates And Governance
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS FOR CREATIONISM-EVOLUTIONISM DEBATE (See Subchapter 10.2.2, Chapter 10, of Part Two.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
the bible is true because the bible says so. checkmate evolutionists
Jbob9954 5 months ago 70
@Jbob9954 yeh well i have a book that says i was made by a banana cheak and mate =D plz reply so i can make u look like a fool
stonerboyno1 4 months ago
@Jbob9954 and my ass is green because i say so.
Sugardaddy501 3 months ago
@Jbob9954 Is that an addition to Poe's Law?
DarthBismarck 2 months ago
@Jbob9954 lol ;)
solisvictor1991 1 month ago
@Jbob9954
lol EdwardCurrent reference
thegameulost 1 month ago
Funny thing, your doing the same thing with you evolution religion. Like I said in my earlier comment whatever other arguments you have are irrelevant. The odds are still better for christians belief than an atheist. Throwing mud my way does not not make your case any more relevant, anyone with a half a brain can see this.
PTKPiper 5 months ago
@PTKPiper Firstly, never said I was an atheist. Don't put words in my mouth. Secondly, wrong again. Learn math. There are an infinite amount of religions that could have you suffering in some sort of hell because you believe in your christian god. Those same religions would leave me alone or exalt me for not being a douche to others. The odds are in my favor once more. Thirdly, "throwing mud" sounds like slinging mud, an idiom that describes an ad hominem attack. You insulted my intellect. Fail?
lordslothsavior 5 months ago
What is funny, evolution can not be proven in the real world. Evolution is make believe for adults who will forever look for a non existing missing link. They spend their time trying to prove there is no God and do a very bad job trying to do it.
PTKPiper 5 months ago
@PTKPiper So stupid. You insult those who believe in evolution for doing exactly what those with religious faith do... only there's more evidence in science.
lordslothsavior 5 months ago
@lordslothsavior You still do not get it. If your talking about bad science, yes there is a lot of it. We can agree to disagree. According to science theories when you die you nothing happens, we both win here. If there is a God when you die you go to heaven or hell according to christian faith, according to my faith I go to heaven, I still win. The odds are better on my side of the argument either way regardless if you believe or not believe, it is irrelevant.
PTKPiper 5 months ago
@PTKPiper Well done. You've turned all of the spiritual questioning over the afterlife into a false dilemma. "Are christians or atheists right?" There are plenty of faiths that punish the non-believers, so you could say that you have better odds than me, but it's less a 50/50 and more of a 1/infinity ratio. Translation: You're no more right than primitive mud-people who said you'd be eaten eternally by worms while conscious if you didn't believe in their mud-god. No god would be a punishing ass.
lordslothsavior 5 months ago
@lordslothsavior a side note, the Rise of the Apes is a great movie to watch. I enjoyed watching the atheist ancestors rise to power in it. I highly recommend it for the entertainment value.
PTKPiper 5 months ago
@PTKPiper On a side note, please learn to spell and use grammar. The hardest part of having a conversation with a religious person isn't that they stop any argument with faith in the unproven; it's the almost universal lack of skill you have in the English language.
lordslothsavior 5 months ago
@lordslothsavior sorry didn't realize this was a spelling bee or a grammar test halfwit. Who in the hell said I was a religious person. Last time I checked being a "christian" and being a "religious person" are two different things. As for the rest of your unimpressive rebuttal, no comment.
PTKPiper 5 months ago
@PTKPiper It's obviously not and I didn't imply that it was. I observed that it's hard to have a conversation with someone when you struggle to understand them. Then you call me a halfwit for showing more effort in getting my point across; I say effort because you're either being lazy or you don't have a strong grasp on English. Christianity is a religion. People that belong to religions are religious people. I didn't even say christian in my second comment. And you refuse to continue. Pathetic.
lordslothsavior 5 months ago
@lordslothsavior Christianity is a relationship with God in my eyes and not a religion. I think I understand your point of view on that. Like I said earlier, we can agree to disagree. You have your belief system and I have mine. I don't think we are going to change our view points any time soon.
I will admit that some Christian make the rest of us Christians look like a bunch of apes, no pun intended. For what it is worth, I take back calling you a halfwit (or jerk).
PTKPiper 5 months ago
@PTKPiper Thank you. I apologize for losing my temper. Agreeing to disagree is usually the best and kindest outcome that people with differing views on important issues can come to, so I'm happy to leave it there. :)
lordslothsavior 5 months ago
@PTKPiper Well you creationist haven't done a stellar job on proving the existence of god ether . We have scientific research with facts. All you have is book written thousands of years ago. A book that was based entirely on superstition and fables.
420gma 4 months ago
@420gma Evolution is a fable for those who believe in bogus science. You say "we have scientific research with facts" is NOT true, if it was how come all your facts are somehow part of the "missing link". This video is so a bad example to debate over coming from a creationist view point, which is by far a more sane understanding of how the earth was created. Evolutionist is just looking for away to justify away to say there is no God, which all of mankind knows there is a God.Romans 1:18-25
PTKPiper 4 months ago
@PTKPiper You call scientific facts bogus simply because you don't want to believe it. Show me physical proof that god exists ! All you have is quotes from a book that is thousands of years old.As for the missing link we will fund it in time.
420gma 4 months ago
@PTKPiper sane? in what way is believing an all powerful being that popped everything into existence spontaneously and magically a sane thing to believe? lmao you probably think the earth is less then 10,000 years old don't you, go back under your bridge.
ELEMENTSFAN666 4 months ago
@ELEMENTSFAN666 is the mark of the beast. Funny you are siding with the evolutionist yet you have the 666 that the bible says in the mark of the beast. Hum....
PTKPiper 4 months ago
@PTKPiper yes! I am the devil i will take your soul muhahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ELEMENTSFAN666 4 months ago
@ELEMENTSFAN666 Don't egg him on. He might think you're actually being serious and take it as confirmation of his beliefs. Poe's Law, remember.
Saavykaas 4 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
@Saavykaas if he does, then hes to far gone for me to give a fuck
ELEMENTSFAN666 4 months ago
Comment removed
Saavykaas 4 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Pipers pick pecks of pickled peppers. Funny how you are posting on a message board as well; you must be very skilled to pick peppers (in pecks, no less) simultaneously.
Bible quotes and references have effect only if you actually place value on what that book has to say; the only thing you've done is quote something. This is the same as me referencing Looney Tunes to describe the physics of gravity or the behavior of coyotes. I can do it, but it means nothing to anyone else.
Saavykaas 4 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
what is this video trying to prove?? that creationnist are morons? i see evolutionist and creationnist are both idiots
4455315 5 months ago
@4455315 no is try to prove how they are wrong about basics concepts in science
shadowmax889 5 months ago
@4455315 So.... what you're saying is, Evolution is stupid, and Creationism is stupid, because you have a third alternative that's better than these?
Or are you just saying that there are always idiots on both sides? Which would be a valid point. But your use of evolutionist colors your statement.
Cyllid 5 months ago
Comment removed
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
just a few videos to begin... "Quantum Awakening - Have Scientists Found God? " "Scientific Evidence that God is real! " "*Quantum Physics* The Reality As You Know It Does Not Exist " "The God Theory " "Modern Science Finds GOD " "Evidence of God: Physics " "Stephen Hawking, Logical and Scientifically Proof of a possible Creator God " "Stephen Hawking: Life in the Universe " "Then where did God come from? (Carl Sagan) " "Life after death conclusion on CNN"
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 Well first of all if scientific evidence really showed that god was real, it would have been on the frekkin NEWS, so I'll not even look into that. Please stop being a troll:( Make funny pictures instead=)
Remman 6 months ago 25
@Remman ""Life after death conclusion on CNN" can you not read?
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@Remman Don't bother, he's completely deluded.
Cyllid 6 months ago
@Cyllid I know, but I just can't let him go. If what I say to him plants a little seed of insecurity towards his delusion it's worth it.
Remman 5 months ago
Light is eternal residing outside of space and time
Light is Omnipresent
Light is Omnipotent
Light is Omniscient
We come from the Light
Yehsua the light
You are a child of the light
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 Light does not exist outside of space and time...
Are you stupid?
Because you sound stupid.
OH, you're using Light as a metaphor for God.
Nope, still sound stupid.
Cyllid 6 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
This has been flagged as spam show
@Cyllid Why are you insulting me? Did I insult you?
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@Cyllid but seriously, are you denying the Big Bang ? Are you denying Science? Are you denying Physics? Becuase these are where I got this. It's Science, you must not be familar with science, I suggest you study it sometime.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 And no, you're not getting what you got from science. You take what scientists have said, and you have twisted it, to fit what you think is there.
The Big Bang is not proof of God, the first law of thermodynamics, any law of thermodynamics, does not prove God. At best you have the case for a Deist God, and if you're going to have a God like that, why not just shorten it one step.
It is not Yeshua.
Cyllid 6 months ago
@Cyllid "Quantum Awakening - Have Scientists Found God? " "Scientific Evidence that God is real! " "*Quantum Physics* The Reality As You Know It Does Not Exist " "The God Theory " "Modern Science Finds GOD " "Evidence of God: Physics " "Stephen Hawking, Logical and Scientifically Proof of a possible Creator God " "Stephen Hawking: Life in the Universe " "Then where did God come from? (Carl Sagan) " "Life after death conclusion on CNN" Start here
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 lawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawllawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawllawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawllawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawllawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawllawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawllawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawllawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawl
Cyllid 6 months ago
@Cyllid did you really just cover your ears and scream "LALALA". WOW man, I guess we know why your an athiest. LOL
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 Actually bro, that was a laugh of derision. That you thought that I hadn't heard of any of these, and moreso that you thought that they were actually persuasive towards your point. You listed Carl Sagan as part of your support for your position. You clearly didn't understand him.
Cyllid 6 months ago
@Cyllid I understand Carl Sagan perfectly, I love Carl Sagan. He was looking for proof of god, me too! He could never fully prove God but he loved God. If you look closly you can see the artist signature. Carl
and Hindu religion is the only relgion whitch mathced science! CArl, he also experiemneted in cananbis and wrote a paper, me too! I have a lot in commen with carl, I love CArl, please dont presume to tell me what I know when YOU didnt even watch the video! PONCE
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 And I have seen that video. And if you think that Carl Sagan, OR Stephen Hawkings can be used to support a personal God (without heavy quote mining), you REALLY don't understand them or their works, or their words..
Cyllid 6 months ago
@Cyllid Nope, just the one God! If you understand the one wou would understand the lessor forms.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@Cyllid It's more then ONE video, There are over 1000 scriptures, around 600,000 verses. And then we have science, the amount of study needed is beyound you I guess. : )
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 Says the idiot that can't even spell beyond with a spell-check. The science is not beyond me, but obviously it's beyond you. What you want me to believe is not science, and is not supported by science without you/other people intentionally twisting it, and making it fit.
You can go ahead and respond, but unless you say something actually moderately intelligent, I won't be. (and no, claiming I'm just ignorant and need to educate myself, is not moderately intelligent.)
Cyllid 6 months ago
Comment removed
Remman 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 Yeah, I don' argue about the numbers of scriptures, but I would however feel somewhat insulted if I would let the scriptures of Will Shakespear, with a total count of 31,534 words (not counting each twise) guide me as a human being. Ergo: Why are your made up words better than any other? Also, you do not have any science, none at all.
Remman 6 months ago
@Cyllid Probably the same thing they used against Einstein:(
Remman 6 months ago
@Cyllid Ponce: An individual who attempts to fake having intelligence, class, or culture.
this is you. your ignorant and pretending to be intelligent.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 Ahahahahaha, I don't need to fake intelligence. I never claimed to have class or culture.
And are you sure it's me whose the ignorant one?
Of course you are, I wouldn't expect anything different.
Cyllid 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 Just read your post on my wall more closely.
I cannot believe you have the audacity to accuse me of Scientific ignorance, when you actually believe that Plastics are the cause of people being born gay.
I'm done with you, and if you can't figure out why... wow. Research a little bit better.
Cyllid 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Cyllid AND YOU NEVER ANSWER MY QUESTIONS WITH ANYTHING MORE THEN INSULTS. YOUR A SAD LITTLE MAN! IF YOUR NOT A COWARD THEN ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@Cyllid Hahahahahaha awesome. No one else spells lawl that way. Two hoots for you. And it's amazing that I can't tell when someone is truly religious or trolling :D
lordslothsavior 5 months ago
1) If they say to you, where have you come from? Say to them, we have come from the light, from the place where the light came into being by it, established it, and appeared in their image. If they say to you, Is it you? Say, We are its children, and we are the chosen of the living Father. If they ask you, what is the evidence of your Father in you?' say to them, 'It is motion and rest. Jesus
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
I don't want to be "this guy," but the grid you say is 10x10 is actually 8x8.
IseeRightThrough2you 6 months ago 18
@IseeRightThrough2you yeah, and the fracton displayed to be 1 / 1 trillion is is really 1/1 quadrillion. or whatever follows a trillion...maybe a bullshitillion?
eastjones 4 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
@IseeRightThrough2you this guy.....
angryaznman 4 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
I'm not really opposed to this video or any other in the series but at :45 seconds the actual video says for a thousand years, 2:12 Thunderf00t says a million years. I don't know if this was a legitimate mistake or not but I've always believed you don't need to change facts to refute creationism, creationists do that pretty well all by themselves.
hard8637 6 months ago
well. its a paradox (ish), every inteligent being in the universe are there by chance. well yeah. think of the infinit size of the universe. and the amounts of trys the universe had , mabey 3 000 000 000 000 trys to spawn life in a second. who the fuck knows man. egos are what makes humans stupid. we are staring the oodds in the face and are not accepting that we are the chosen ones. lol . and doing things about it. no we are being stupid , doing stupid human things.
tisilwm 6 months ago
There is a 1 in 1 chance that this video makes sense
RobBrooksMusic 6 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Athiests! You are forgetting one important thing!
Tides go in, tides go out.
You can;t explain that!
It just happens.
You can't explain that!
MeepullStewray 6 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
@MeepullStewray please tell me you are being sarcastic....?
azz2020 6 months ago
@MeepullStewray what? i think later in this series he actually explains it to u. Don't watch these things to attempt to prove him wrong when he already has proven u wrong.
DarkLady1313 6 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Ah! Apparently, Kent Hovind & Venomfangx are science editors for Bill O'Reilly & his Faux News colleagues. Where are the FCC, NIST & the NSF when you need 'em?
SIMKINETICS 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101
I really like how you insult the man concerning his personal preference about what kind of women he likes and claim he is judging people as if judging people is wrong in your mind, yet you turn around and call him a pervert and that he likes little boys and think nothing of it.
As if it gives you any right to be able to judge the guy because you think he did it first, unless you like hypocrisy.
albert475 6 months ago
Comment removed
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@Dmorono
Why not do it here now? Why claim you can do it and not? I'm sure he would be interested in hearing what have to say if you can do it.
Nice name by the way.
albert475 6 months ago
All of this is pure BS. His Exalted Noodliness, in a night of drunken debauchery, created the heavens and the earth. I'd be happy to spend the time to convert Mr. Thunderfoot over a plate of sumptuous, perfectly prepared spaghetti topped with divine sacred sauce and a nice bottle of rum. Arrrrrr.
dmorono 6 months ago
I love these videos. They are fabulously edited, and hilarious. Thanks.
jesschappellable 6 months ago
trampledone the pervy creepy guy might judge me! OHH NOO!
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
3:26 i would hate to be called on in class to explain this....
thompson8305 6 months ago
1:03 isn't that 8X8 not 10X10? i been noticing these mistakes in all his videos....
thompson8305 6 months ago
this video describes the universe being improbable :S
you creationists truly suck
pghg022 6 months ago
yes, we are an accident and a random chance, what is it about that fact cant creationists get into there dumb thick skulls.
trampledone 6 months ago
@trampledone Chapter 1 The War within
Chapter 2 Self Realization
Chapter 3 Selfless Service
Chapter 14 The Forces of Evolution
This book has been around for almost 4000 years
What took the unbelivers so long to finnally agree?
Chapter 15 THe Supreme Self
Chapter 16 Two Paths
Chapter 18 Freedom
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 its ok thanks, i dont believe in a god so you can save the preaching. good day.
trampledone 6 months ago
@trampledone "good day" Alright fezz
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@trampledone Only a fool would say in his heart thier is no God. If you searched for the truth to your questions yo would find them but instead you choice to be ignorant. I could not be you
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 only fools believe that god exists, just dreamers and wishful thinking makes u believe in this fairy tale and you call me fezz, thats like a god believer to call people names that doesnt believe in your magical sky daddy and imaginary friend.
trampledone 6 months ago
@trampledone aww, did I hurt your feelings? I said "All right fezz" when you said "Your a ignoorant fucktard, good day" . Sounds to me like your delusional! You judge people and you condemn them, you insult them and you mock them, but im the unGodly one! I prefer not speaking to people like you. Please go away!
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trampledone "i love women with big feet mmmm." WTF man! Your judgeing people while your profile page annoucninces you love feet? You like looking at porn and little girls from a quick view of your comments on youtube. Good luck with that
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@trampledone why did you subscribe to that little boys youtube page in europe? You llike little boys too?
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@trampledone The Bhagavad Gita written 3700 years ago by Khrishna, and told in stories from Noah in 4990 BC over 7000 years ago. tells of evolution and its part in the path of life. Why is it that life is explained but people fail to read the knowledge? Are you to busy?
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
The RAstaman vibration is posative, one love, smoke a joint, A holy gift to your mind
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
the whole unlikelihood that the DNA would form in a certain way actually HELPS evolution. human and chimps share a 98% genetic similarity, that means that you have to multiply 10^65 and 98. those are much bigger odds of a DNA sequence to repeat, now what's more likely? that god randomly made DNA to fall in that order or that we shared an ancestor with chimps and the DNA differentiated with time and mutations over billions of years.
Nixom1334 6 months ago
The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
Albert Einstein: * A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death. * I believe in Spinoza's God, Who reveals Himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a God Who concerns Himself with the fate and the doings of mankind.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101
" I believe in Spinoza's God"
Yet you claim to be xtian, you cant be both.
gorilla199uncensored 6 months ago
@gorilla199uncensored I beleive in the HIndu God
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101
" I believe in Spinoza's God"
That contradicts that god aswell
gorilla199uncensored 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gorilla199uncensored see him everywhere, universal form in everyone, all the time. He is embodied in every form and in all forms.
"The entire universe is suspended from me as my necklace of jewels"
"I am the taste of pure water and radiance of the sun and moon"
Seek and YOU will find brother. One Love
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gorilla199uncensored I beleive in the Muslim God
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I beleive in the Jewish God
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
I beleive in the eniffable God. All names, and all atributes of God. one love
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@truthseeker010101
"I beleive in the HIndu God"
How many is that?
gorilla199uncensored 6 months ago
@truthseeker010101 I "beleive" in the power of observation and the ability to reason.
ozzfest72 6 months ago
@ozzfest72 Reasoning leads to God, and the supreme purpose of life.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
@ozzfest72
J. Robert Oppenheimer quotes the Bhagavad Gita: "Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
as the first Atomic Bomb goes off, the one he built.
truthseeker010101 6 months ago
How is it that hardly any major religion has looked at science and concluded, 'This is better than we thought! The Universe is much bigger than our prophets said, grander, more subtle, more elegant?' Carl Sagan
truthseeker010101 6 months ago