well, lets be serious here.1000 different scenarios could be thought up,, but If wikileaks all of the sudden does something that ISNT wikileaks and just a month ago the govt said they wanna talk to their creator. Wikileaks may be sending you a message that they arent allowed to be the same site (or to talk about it) if they want to continue living. Its only a matter of time before our freedom of internet speech is gone and we will all have to talk in code.
wikileaks is been awesome, but there is one thing i knew along my way is that we can't belive 100% on anything, allways think about the implications, who will benefit from the information leaked...
...as it has been said more times than "give me a big mac" , the 1st casualty of war is the truth. Believe nothing if at all possible (some emergency actions do not permit time to act beyond preprogrammed intel.
~ Yet the truth is immortal & ever present, not possible to hide , always was & always shall be, regardless of sentience or voidence of, to recognize .
-if this seem like a impossible imposition, then that is the place to invoke belief in the possibility that it is not.
Another theory is that the gov found him and cut a deal because he is to valuable and has credibility with the public so now he works for them or he goes to a secret prison or gets killed etc. He does not look like a real tough guy that can endure torture and long periods of confinement without a cpu so it would be easy for the US gov to turn him. He has become to high profile something had to be done about him b4 he starts a revolution against the NWO Agenda of WAR.
Now it all make sense to me now, why wikileaks has been holding back videos. They tends to gave so many excuses to hold them back every time they were asked about the afghan innocent civilians bombing video they promised to release. It looks as though they were negotiating for ransom.
However I'm still hoping all accusations about wikileaks wasn't true tough, and I'm still hoping they will release the afghan video soon.
I was suspicious of wikileaks latest release on the fact that those documents targeted pakistan and got so much media attention this time. I remember the media were silent about the "Collateral Murder" video. And wikileaks was suppose to release a video about bombing of innocent civilians in Afghanistan.
I'm glad John Young lay it all out for us, pointing it out that wikileaks was all about money after all. I think wikileaks may have struck a handsome deal with the pentagon to switch sides.
So, this means that wikileaks isn't real? They just want fame and money? I hope that wikileaks is a legitimate source of information. But I don't know. Just like I don't know if this channel is legitimate. I mean I remember a guest on here talking about we would be in martial law during the 2008 elections and right before it there would be a false flag like 911. It didn't happen. How about the 'dots' on the mailboxes to come and kill us if we have red dots.Fear mongering it seems but who knows
i would assume if all was above board the govt would arrest him for releasing confidential army documents (National Security Issue)
Instead the media is spinning it as "making the army look like they are covering up civilian casualties on a big scale"..therefore "making the govt look bad"
gotta remember the people of the middle east will see this leak news, and get very angry and have another case against US for murdering innocent people.
thank you alex. people wanna say youre cooky, until your found right. but i felt the same way you did after this conversation. Like a mexican. On the fence.
This could be disinfo for many purposes. Maybe they are trying to build a case for retreat in Afghanistan that they can sell to the neocon hordes. Or they are looking for sellable excuses to move further into Pakistan
wiki most likely got bought off or was forced by the shawdow gov or they would go to jail just my thoughts, they have turned a 180 have to question it
Interesting this guest is from a rival site doing much the same thing as Wiki Leaks. Sorry, AJ, but not certain this guy is totally objective. He may well be objective but one has to wonder just a little.
I'm in the same mind set, the pentagon spokes person on fox news said "any responsible journalist would have given us the information to check" that just reads like we will check and sensor what we wish, this guy also says they should have contact government sources ect.
But why give them a heads up and prepare themselves :S
@james9689 Reading the news today, it makes me wonder. This whole leak really looks planned, considering the circumstances and was used to deflect something far more relevant. It said several billion dollars is missing from the fund that was supposed to aid in reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan. The Pentagon once again cannot account for it. Echos of the 911 "attack" on the Pentagon and the only part hit was accounting records. It was pure deflection, IMO. Same old, same old.
@UnDe4dB4stard NO, it is true. Check out the channel morningmayan. or something like that. It is a blonde that reported it with the links to back it up.
Comment removed
zoodie085 1 year ago
only we need one Thing stop the stupid war, spending all money there.
lindo803 1 year ago
What a terrible guest.. there has got to be someone who doesn't sound like a bumbling idiot to come on the show..
AlreadyBarcoded 1 year ago
Alex could be right about the gate keeping thing...
Charmer4856 1 year ago
well, lets be serious here.1000 different scenarios could be thought up,, but If wikileaks all of the sudden does something that ISNT wikileaks and just a month ago the govt said they wanna talk to their creator. Wikileaks may be sending you a message that they arent allowed to be the same site (or to talk about it) if they want to continue living. Its only a matter of time before our freedom of internet speech is gone and we will all have to talk in code.
HorrorAngel666 1 year ago
it all sounded like a conspiracy theory ,, until 6:26
HorrorAngel666 1 year ago
wikileaks is been awesome, but there is one thing i knew along my way is that we can't belive 100% on anything, allways think about the implications, who will benefit from the information leaked...
StraussBR 1 year ago
To believe without proof is ludicrous
lzycatfish3113 1 year ago 2
all alex jones does is confuse people
280393TG 1 year ago
...as it has been said more times than "give me a big mac" , the 1st casualty of war is the truth. Believe nothing if at all possible (some emergency actions do not permit time to act beyond preprogrammed intel.
~ Yet the truth is immortal & ever present, not possible to hide , always was & always shall be, regardless of sentience or voidence of, to recognize .
-if this seem like a impossible imposition, then that is the place to invoke belief in the possibility that it is not.
= Peace out !
docatomics 1 year ago
Another theory is that the gov found him and cut a deal because he is to valuable and has credibility with the public so now he works for them or he goes to a secret prison or gets killed etc. He does not look like a real tough guy that can endure torture and long periods of confinement without a cpu so it would be easy for the US gov to turn him. He has become to high profile something had to be done about him b4 he starts a revolution against the NWO Agenda of WAR.
NightCapper13 1 year ago 2
Now it all make sense to me now, why wikileaks has been holding back videos. They tends to gave so many excuses to hold them back every time they were asked about the afghan innocent civilians bombing video they promised to release. It looks as though they were negotiating for ransom.
However I'm still hoping all accusations about wikileaks wasn't true tough, and I'm still hoping they will release the afghan video soon.
uglybetties 1 year ago 2
I was suspicious of wikileaks latest release on the fact that those documents targeted pakistan and got so much media attention this time. I remember the media were silent about the "Collateral Murder" video. And wikileaks was suppose to release a video about bombing of innocent civilians in Afghanistan.
I'm glad John Young lay it all out for us, pointing it out that wikileaks was all about money after all. I think wikileaks may have struck a handsome deal with the pentagon to switch sides.
uglybetties 1 year ago
John Young was a great guest.
wow, deep and profound segment.
biozamadotcom 1 year ago
So, this means that wikileaks isn't real? They just want fame and money? I hope that wikileaks is a legitimate source of information. But I don't know. Just like I don't know if this channel is legitimate. I mean I remember a guest on here talking about we would be in martial law during the 2008 elections and right before it there would be a false flag like 911. It didn't happen. How about the 'dots' on the mailboxes to come and kill us if we have red dots.Fear mongering it seems but who knows
genefire 1 year ago
who can i trust
182511419139208 1 year ago
@182511419139208
Your self, I guess.
Urhoboman5 1 year ago
It does seem rather odd the webmaster of wikilinks he showing his face all the place like he's a celebrity.
seanboy80 1 year ago
@seanboy80 lol i saw it live on bbc yesterday answering questions, was kinda gay... feels like he loves attention and stuff (not literally)
MrWisePete 1 year ago
@seanboy80 i agree.
i would assume if all was above board the govt would arrest him for releasing confidential army documents (National Security Issue)
Instead the media is spinning it as "making the army look like they are covering up civilian casualties on a big scale"..therefore "making the govt look bad"
gotta remember the people of the middle east will see this leak news, and get very angry and have another case against US for murdering innocent people.
this leak serves SO MANY agendas
freddiedread 1 year ago
thank you alex. people wanna say youre cooky, until your found right. but i felt the same way you did after this conversation. Like a mexican. On the fence.
billhed405 1 year ago
Sounds like this guy had a bad experience with wiki leaks maybe he's being overly skeptical.
Shaunt1 1 year ago
I think there might actually be a debate up on here...
steamidjf 1 year ago
This could be disinfo for many purposes. Maybe they are trying to build a case for retreat in Afghanistan that they can sell to the neocon hordes. Or they are looking for sellable excuses to move further into Pakistan
Stepper11 1 year ago
Perhaps it the selective release to preapproved person's or entities?
Hum... Cant always believe the hype. Great lesson!
MrMindfucker 1 year ago
wiki most likely got bought off or was forced by the shawdow gov or they would go to jail just my thoughts, they have turned a 180 have to question it
nas4x 1 year ago
Interesting this guest is from a rival site doing much the same thing as Wiki Leaks. Sorry, AJ, but not certain this guy is totally objective. He may well be objective but one has to wonder just a little.
brightsorcerer 1 year ago
@brightsorcerer
I'm in the same mind set, the pentagon spokes person on fox news said "any responsible journalist would have given us the information to check" that just reads like we will check and sensor what we wish, this guy also says they should have contact government sources ect.
But why give them a heads up and prepare themselves :S
james9689 1 year ago
@james9689 Reading the news today, it makes me wonder. This whole leak really looks planned, considering the circumstances and was used to deflect something far more relevant. It said several billion dollars is missing from the fund that was supposed to aid in reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan. The Pentagon once again cannot account for it. Echos of the 911 "attack" on the Pentagon and the only part hit was accounting records. It was pure deflection, IMO. Same old, same old.
brightsorcerer 1 year ago 2
I already know what Wiki Leaks is, it's a front. So they can catch people who want to whistleblow
22CaliberHitters 1 year ago
4 States have made it a class 1 felony to videotape police on duty
HistoryTours 1 year ago
@HistoryTours bs? which states
UnDe4dB4stard 1 year ago
@UnDe4dB4stard NO, it is true. Check out the channel morningmayan. or something like that. It is a blonde that reported it with the links to back it up.
SurvivalWithBushcraf 1 year ago
@UnDe4dB4stard ....bs?.... Illinois, Massachusetts, and Maryland ?
watch?v=xxSsBmai1Xs
Yellow2011 1 year ago