They wanted us to see what was going on, thats why they kept the kids in the school and turned on the t.v. then blasted it 24 hours a day for months, to burn ideas into our minds. Its like a beehive they smacked and said the bad guys over there and then some of us wanted to swarm
I remember that there are some footages here on youtube with a high end camera ( back in those days) it picked up IR spots on the world trade center and other buildings. And it also picked up a us UAV. So. It was a self guided airplane with a warhead in it.
and yet you are watching 'conspiracy pedaling nut jobs' videos?
If you can watch this 911 footage..and believe that a plane can hit a building and pass straight through the wall without being damaged...go ahead.. its your life...enjoy it.
Finally..big mistake...threaten someone online with a bullet in the head...reported and passed on.
Makes sense... still doesn't answer the question of "where did the buildings go" or are you talking about faking the plane crashing into the towers? And no offense (not really, i do mean to offend you), but stick to straight facts and stop deviating from the main topic by "researching" what other people look at on their spare time on youtube, it is their business- not yours. And the constant checkup of their youtube history somehow relates to how serial killers and psychopaths operate.
Yes I am talking about faking the plane crashing into the building.
As for looking at 'gofindjeff' profile. Its very simple. Either you know what you are talking about or you dont. If someone has a genuine interest in this topic i will gladly debate them. Answered over a thousand comments.Come here with rubbish you get what you deserve. Some who says 'Was Elvis on the flight too?" ... pure FOX news stuff.
I have looked :) at your channel by the way ... hope you dont mind)
But do you know what you are talking about? Or just interested in arguing over something that you have a bigoted view of? Answering over a thousand questions doesn't mean you're correct, it just states that you are a very strong believer in yourself. Oh, and by the way- if you did look at my channel, then it proves my point entirely- so no i don't mind, instead i thank you.
Actually my point is that I dont mind discussing the content of my videos. If someone has something to say about the content of the videos that is what the comment channel is about.
Now... why are you not commenting on the content on this video and instead talking about me?Why engage in fallacies?
Talk about the content of this video in your next comment if you wish or I will block/delete you.
I notice now you have removed "fotoset kitayanki mega" from your favorites and put in place some serious sounding stuff about air crash investigations
Here we go again. Was Elvis on the flight too? How about JFK, was he hit by debris falling off the South tower as it was propelled back in time by the force of the inpact? Perhaps a UFO tried to stich the building back together right after the second jet hit. Get a clue and start accepting that when you see a horse, it is most likely a horse and not a zebra in disguise. Worry about what is happening to our country today, and stop living in your own rewritten past (w/ co-credit to Art Bell).
these have been favorited 19 hours ago (recent activity).Soft Porn girl 'princess Kattie ' although not in your favorites at this time is still in your recent activity box.
The plane obviously breaks up as it goes into the wall of the building. I mean, nothing bigger than a hubcap comes out the other side - a lot of debris, building, sure - but where do you get the idea that the aircraft didn't completely break up on impact? Any deforming? It sure did!
If you mean, how did the aircraft even penetrate the building (and not just crumple on the outside), remember, you could fire a missile without a warhead into a building at 500mph and it will still make a hole!
Man this is simple. Pls pause the video where you can see any deforming of the plane. It disappears into building alright but it does not deform in any way. It disappears in without breaking in any way.
When you have found the deforming.. pls make a note of the time in the video for all to see and pause also.
TodM, it may also mean that most people coming across this video think he's totally wrong, which does happen top be the case. People do tend to shout down an imbecile.
The wings have entered the building and the entry holes have healed themselves.
Sky they obivously don't like this clip ... how can a aluminium can with wings break apart like the one shown in your clip and yet fly straight into a building and building heals itself and later turns to dust.
No, the holes do not heal over. they fill with vaporized fuel. The resolution and focus of a consumer grade video camera are not always good enough to see that kind of detail at that distance.
Lefty I've been looking at 911 for along time ... your comment re the holes filling with vapourized fuel is one of the most uneducated comments I've ever read. Best of luck with any futher comments you make ... think about them first please.
I just wish that you were the dumbest SOB on the net. It would mean that the species is not in such great peril of devoling into a total pack of morons. Sadly, there are dumber than you, but not by much.
Learn what happens to fuel when it is expressed from a fuel tank on such an impact.
hows about you learn the design of the WTC, understand how the exterior columns were, how they were made, and then go and brush up on physics and understand how much force and power is behind an aircraft weighing a quarter of a million pounds flying at 400+mph. Also learn about how a fluid behaves and just how much mass is inside each wing. Take a guess how much one cubic meter of water weighs. Then think how much fuel in a wingtank will weigh.
If the plane was stationary and the building moving at '550' (lol) mph would the plane pass straight the wall of the building like it does in this video?
red herring. Your lack of understanding basic physics is showing.
How about this:
What if you took an armor piercing bullet. Made it stationary, and threw a 10x30 square 5inch plate off of an APC at it at the same speed as the bullet, will it do the same thing as the bullet being fired into the armor?
No sir I did not avoid it . I pointed out a MAJOR flaw in your assumption and "question". Your "question" is tragically flawed and thereby irrelevant. The understanding of physics is most necessary. You obviously do not understand.
Oh and by the way, the plane never remained in one piece going through the building. It may have for a split second as it was entering the building, but thats it. It got shredded up inside with some debris going out the other end.
to Bundy 133T: Physics? Go and look up the free fall for metal from 400 meters. And then compare to the world trade center. They're identical!!! Oh and by the way. 1/3 of the tower was designed to hold 500% of its own weight for 2 weeks. There's NO way that it could have gone down in near free fall speed into a convenient little pile.
Go watch the Sandia test in which they rammed a Phantom into a solid wall. The wall did not give way, but the fuselage of the Phantom only shows deformation where it starts to pile up right against the wall.
The plane going into the tower made the wall get out of the way, sheared connections between vertical columns. Nothing there on which to build up a pile of compressed aircraft.
Who or what was behind 9/11 is not known, not to me anyway. But the WTC towers were definitely hit by Boeing 767-200s, first one was AA, second one was United. Whether the pax were concious, or on board, who was flying or was it pre-programmed autoflight, I do not know. Probably, we never will. But the footage is real, they were 767s.
"Look at this video again which was shown on CNN. The plane hits the building..
1. pls point out to me any deforming in any part of the plane as it hits the incredibly strong steel wall. Give me a time to pause the vid. Pls note,hudson river plane crash was caused by birds hitting the plane.
2.engine penetrate the building? maybe, but the nose? the wings? fuselage?Intact and without losing their shape.
A plane can pass through a steel wall without deforming in any way. without exploding until it is fully inside the building. breaking newtons laws of motion.
well done fordlandau. could u point me to another video of a plane passing intact through a wall?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The outside of modern sky scarpers are not solid it all. They have a curtain wall which is essentially only made of metal and glass to provide an outside "layer". This curtain wall does no load bearing and is very flimsy when hit by hundreds of tonnes of jet going at high speed. The plane was halted once within the building by the structural core of steel and cement.
Newton's Laws of motion are well expressed here too if you bothered to understand them . Delusions are hard to correct!
"The outside of modern sky scarpers are not solid it all. They have a curtain wall which is essentially only made of metal and glass to provide an outside "layer". This curtain wall does no load bearing and is very flimsy"
Pls do some research before commenting or you will look foolish.
/watch?v=zW3aXI1w0yQ&feature=channel_page
A docu from the 80s about the WTC
1. Outside walls were incredibly strong becos they were load bearing!
where exactly is the plane coming out the otherside of the wall, I think you will find its debris passing through the building. A 4 tonne engine hitting a building at 320 kts will want to continue its motion... ask Newton (1st law) I am sorry you are the one that is deluded
From your channel you seem to have a strong interest in aviation.
Look at this video again which was shown on CNN. The plane hits the building..
1. pls point out to me any deforming in any part of the plane as it hits the incredibly strong steel wall. Give me a time to pause the vid. Pls note,hudson river plane crash was caused by birds hitting the plane.
2.engine penetrate the building? maybe, but the nose? the wings? fuselage?Intact and without losing their shape.
it's obvious the US government brought this on to their people. don't understand why there are still people speculating that this could have been terrorist activity. if you people are still so DELUDED, why not look at the facts surrounding the pentagon. the most surveillance/guarded place on earth, and yet there is only one measly disoriented video released to the public later to be have been deemed tampered with. you ppl are just a bunch of airheads going on a power trip.
So you have seen a lighter hollow object hit a denser heaver object before and the lighter hollow object passes straight through without dedorming in any way and breaking newtons laws of motion? Where have you seen this ?
So you have seen a lighter hollow object hit a denser heaver object before and the lighter hollow object passes straight through without dedorming in any way and breaking newtons laws of motion? Where have you seen this ?
I don t quite get your point, what i meant was that both crash are real, because in the video you ask "wich one is faked?", I am getting the whole picture here? Later;)
A libtard couldn't recognize the truth if a terrorist hit them with a 747
KCandBluesDad 4 months ago
ooOOpiff
KinetikPlayground 2 years ago
I don't get it? They are both real?
CripesAMighty 2 years ago 4
I remember watching it live. Back in school, years ago. They kept showing it over and over again.
And i remember thinking, it looks like it just went through the building and then there was an explosion. Is that really what a crash looks like?
But i didn't really think anything of it till a couple years ago when i finally started researching 911.
All of the shots clearly look like an explosion, with a plane flying into it. Not being a "conspiracy nut" that's what it looks like.
optionaxis 2 years ago 2
call it like it is. well done.
skyarcher 2 years ago
It's only been a year lol.
493175001 2 years ago
what has only been a year
skyarcher 2 years ago
what is your highest received diploma?
gairero 2 years ago
i was clearly talking about 911, idk why your replying that to me.
i even said 911
optionaxis 2 years ago
493175001 it hasn't been a year you idiot haha.
luke0412563 2 years ago
They wanted us to see what was going on, thats why they kept the kids in the school and turned on the t.v. then blasted it 24 hours a day for months, to burn ideas into our minds. Its like a beehive they smacked and said the bad guys over there and then some of us wanted to swarm
meth062 2 years ago
I remember that there are some footages here on youtube with a high end camera ( back in those days) it picked up IR spots on the world trade center and other buildings. And it also picked up a us UAV. So. It was a self guided airplane with a warhead in it.
bigpizza112 2 years ago
You need a bullet in the head skyarcher
ExNihiloJimmy 2 years ago
would u like to elaborate?
or have u been watching too much Sopranos lately?
skyarcher 2 years ago
Just sick of you conspiracy pedaling nut jobs
ExNihiloJimmy 2 years ago
"Just sick of you conspiracy pedaling nut jobs"
and yet you are watching 'conspiracy pedaling nut jobs' videos?
If you can watch this 911 footage..and believe that a plane can hit a building and pass straight through the wall without being damaged...go ahead.. its your life...enjoy it.
Finally..big mistake...threaten someone online with a bullet in the head...reported and passed on.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Makes sense... still doesn't answer the question of "where did the buildings go" or are you talking about faking the plane crashing into the towers? And no offense (not really, i do mean to offend you), but stick to straight facts and stop deviating from the main topic by "researching" what other people look at on their spare time on youtube, it is their business- not yours. And the constant checkup of their youtube history somehow relates to how serial killers and psychopaths operate.
asianwong 2 years ago
Yes I am talking about faking the plane crashing into the building.
As for looking at 'gofindjeff' profile. Its very simple. Either you know what you are talking about or you dont. If someone has a genuine interest in this topic i will gladly debate them. Answered over a thousand comments.Come here with rubbish you get what you deserve. Some who says 'Was Elvis on the flight too?" ... pure FOX news stuff.
I have looked :) at your channel by the way ... hope you dont mind)
skyarcher 2 years ago
But do you know what you are talking about? Or just interested in arguing over something that you have a bigoted view of? Answering over a thousand questions doesn't mean you're correct, it just states that you are a very strong believer in yourself. Oh, and by the way- if you did look at my channel, then it proves my point entirely- so no i don't mind, instead i thank you.
asianwong 2 years ago
Actually my point is that I dont mind discussing the content of my videos. If someone has something to say about the content of the videos that is what the comment channel is about.
Now... why are you not commenting on the content on this video and instead talking about me?Why engage in fallacies?
Talk about the content of this video in your next comment if you wish or I will block/delete you.
skyarcher 2 years ago
I notice now you have removed "fotoset kitayanki mega" from your favorites and put in place some serious sounding stuff about air crash investigations
skyarcher 2 years ago
Here we go again. Was Elvis on the flight too? How about JFK, was he hit by debris falling off the South tower as it was propelled back in time by the force of the inpact? Perhaps a UFO tried to stich the building back together right after the second jet hit. Get a clue and start accepting that when you see a horse, it is most likely a horse and not a zebra in disguise. Worry about what is happening to our country today, and stop living in your own rewritten past (w/ co-credit to Art Bell).
gofindjeff 2 years ago
Here is a suggestion for you . stick to your "fotoset kitayanki mega" in your favorites .. simple stuff like that.Soft porn.
911 is a hoax which has lead to the occupation of countries and hundreds of thousands of deaths and the theft of those countrys' resources.
This clip proves the hoax. As does all the TV footage.
skyarcher 2 years ago
these have been favorited 19 hours ago (recent activity).Soft Porn girl 'princess Kattie ' although not in your favorites at this time is still in your recent activity box.
skyarcher 2 years ago
The shills are corrupt arseholes."UA 175" was fake.That is the truth.
machfron 2 years ago
well spoken )
skyarcher 2 years ago
TripleZ89. You may cuse elsewhere.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Faked aircraft ≠ aircraft
KimmoKuopio 2 years ago
Shill accounts on utube ≠ real accounts.
skyarcher 2 years ago
The plane obviously breaks up as it goes into the wall of the building. I mean, nothing bigger than a hubcap comes out the other side - a lot of debris, building, sure - but where do you get the idea that the aircraft didn't completely break up on impact? Any deforming? It sure did!
If you mean, how did the aircraft even penetrate the building (and not just crumple on the outside), remember, you could fire a missile without a warhead into a building at 500mph and it will still make a hole!
cedarjet707 2 years ago
Man this is simple. Pls pause the video where you can see any deforming of the plane. It disappears into building alright but it does not deform in any way. It disappears in without breaking in any way.
When you have found the deforming.. pls make a note of the time in the video for all to see and pause also.
skyarcher 2 years ago
Sky you appear to be inundated with shills ... must mean you are saying and doing all the right things. 5*s
TodMcInerney 2 years ago
I like pausing @ 0:38
The wings have entered the building and the entry holes have healed themselves.
TodMcInerney 2 years ago
amazing yes ! This was some building. It had the ability to heal itself in one instance and completely destroy itself in another instance?
a living entity .
skyarcher 2 years ago
They should take a 'shill pill' and relax )
skyarcher 2 years ago
TodM, it may also mean that most people coming across this video think he's totally wrong, which does happen top be the case. People do tend to shout down an imbecile.
leftysergeant 2 years ago
I state my comment again for the record.
I like pausing @ 0:38
The wings have entered the building and the entry holes have healed themselves.
Sky they obivously don't like this clip ... how can a aluminium can with wings break apart like the one shown in your clip and yet fly straight into a building and building heals itself and later turns to dust.
Plane weight (approx) 80 tons
Building weight 500,000 tons
TodMcInerney 2 years ago
Who could have thought that the pause button would a mans worst enemy?
thanks Tod. You are 100% correct in this.
Digital manipulation of the moving image. Easily done. Easily spotted also.
skyarcher 2 years ago
No, the holes do not heal over. they fill with vaporized fuel. The resolution and focus of a consumer grade video camera are not always good enough to see that kind of detail at that distance.
leftysergeant 2 years ago
Lefty I've been looking at 911 for along time ... your comment re the holes filling with vapourized fuel is one of the most uneducated comments I've ever read. Best of luck with any futher comments you make ... think about them first please.
TodMcInerney 2 years ago
I just wish that you were the dumbest SOB on the net. It would mean that the species is not in such great peril of devoling into a total pack of morons. Sadly, there are dumber than you, but not by much.
Learn what happens to fuel when it is expressed from a fuel tank on such an impact.
leftysergeant 2 years ago
..and none of the fuel explodes until it is entirely inside the building?? it vaporizes lol!!
I have heard it all now.
Here is a challenge for you kind sir..o one who is so knowledgeable.
Pls direct me a Tod to a video where jet fuel doesnt explode but vapourizes on impact?? Surely you are not going to direct us to the phantom video??
The 911 'jets' do exactly the opposite of the jet in this video...they do not vapourize,, they pass through the wall intact!! amazing
skyarcher 2 years ago
hows about you learn the design of the WTC, understand how the exterior columns were, how they were made, and then go and brush up on physics and understand how much force and power is behind an aircraft weighing a quarter of a million pounds flying at 400+mph. Also learn about how a fluid behaves and just how much mass is inside each wing. Take a guess how much one cubic meter of water weighs. Then think how much fuel in a wingtank will weigh.
You sir have failed, miserably.
Bundy133T 2 years ago
I forgot about this comment sorry.\
Here is a question for you.
If the plane was stationary and the building moving at '550' (lol) mph would the plane pass straight the wall of the building like it does in this video?
skyarcher 2 years ago
red herring. Your lack of understanding basic physics is showing.
How about this:
What if you took an armor piercing bullet. Made it stationary, and threw a 10x30 square 5inch plate off of an APC at it at the same speed as the bullet, will it do the same thing as the bullet being fired into the armor?
Now do you see the major fault in your logic?
Strike two.
Bundy133T 2 years ago
you dont need me to tell you that you have avoided my question.
so again.
What we see here is a plane strike a building and the plane passes straight through it without deforming in any way.
Your question. so if the building were to hit the stationary plane would the plane pass straight through without deforming in any way?
pls answer.
skyarcher 2 years ago
No sir I did not avoid it . I pointed out a MAJOR flaw in your assumption and "question". Your "question" is tragically flawed and thereby irrelevant. The understanding of physics is most necessary. You obviously do not understand.
Oh and by the way, the plane never remained in one piece going through the building. It may have for a split second as it was entering the building, but thats it. It got shredded up inside with some debris going out the other end.
Bundy133T 2 years ago
to Bundy 133T: Physics? Go and look up the free fall for metal from 400 meters. And then compare to the world trade center. They're identical!!! Oh and by the way. 1/3 of the tower was designed to hold 500% of its own weight for 2 weeks. There's NO way that it could have gone down in near free fall speed into a convenient little pile.
bigpizza112 2 years ago
now where the hell did you dig up that crap???
Bundy133T 2 years ago
Go watch the Sandia test in which they rammed a Phantom into a solid wall. The wall did not give way, but the fuselage of the Phantom only shows deformation where it starts to pile up right against the wall.
The plane going into the tower made the wall get out of the way, sheared connections between vertical columns. Nothing there on which to build up a pile of compressed aircraft.
leftysergeant 2 years ago
Who or what was behind 9/11 is not known, not to me anyway. But the WTC towers were definitely hit by Boeing 767-200s, first one was AA, second one was United. Whether the pax were concious, or on board, who was flying or was it pre-programmed autoflight, I do not know. Probably, we never will. But the footage is real, they were 767s.
cedarjet707 2 years ago
megathumper below..
"Look at this video again which was shown on CNN. The plane hits the building..
1. pls point out to me any deforming in any part of the plane as it hits the incredibly strong steel wall. Give me a time to pause the vid. Pls note,hudson river plane crash was caused by birds hitting the plane.
2.engine penetrate the building? maybe, but the nose? the wings? fuselage?Intact and without losing their shape.
i am deluded? "
skyarcher 2 years ago
Hmmm, neither are faked.
FuryofRich 3 years ago
Oh dear..A conspiracy theorist alert...both clips are real.
Oh but skyarcher would think they faked man on the moon and the Earth really is flat...
fordlandau 3 years ago
not that easy it seems to spot the fake.
A plane can pass through a steel wall without deforming in any way. without exploding until it is fully inside the building. breaking newtons laws of motion.
well done fordlandau. could u point me to another video of a plane passing intact through a wall?
lets hear you.
skyarcher 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The outside of modern sky scarpers are not solid it all. They have a curtain wall which is essentially only made of metal and glass to provide an outside "layer". This curtain wall does no load bearing and is very flimsy when hit by hundreds of tonnes of jet going at high speed. The plane was halted once within the building by the structural core of steel and cement.
Newton's Laws of motion are well expressed here too if you bothered to understand them . Delusions are hard to correct!
fordlandau 3 years ago
Quote :
"The outside of modern sky scarpers are not solid it all. They have a curtain wall which is essentially only made of metal and glass to provide an outside "layer". This curtain wall does no load bearing and is very flimsy"
Pls do some research before commenting or you will look foolish.
/watch?v=zW3aXI1w0yQ&feature=channel_page
A docu from the 80s about the WTC
1. Outside walls were incredibly strong becos they were load bearing!
2. able to take multiple large jet crashes!
skyarcher 3 years ago
Also, where is another video of a plane passing through the outer wall of a building intact??
pls come back with this...
skyarcher 3 years ago
where exactly is the plane coming out the otherside of the wall, I think you will find its debris passing through the building. A 4 tonne engine hitting a building at 320 kts will want to continue its motion... ask Newton (1st law) I am sorry you are the one that is deluded
megathumper777 3 years ago
Deluded?
From your channel you seem to have a strong interest in aviation.
Look at this video again which was shown on CNN. The plane hits the building..
1. pls point out to me any deforming in any part of the plane as it hits the incredibly strong steel wall. Give me a time to pause the vid. Pls note,hudson river plane crash was caused by birds hitting the plane.
2.engine penetrate the building? maybe, but the nose? the wings? fuselage?Intact and without losing their shape.
i am deluded?
skyarcher 3 years ago
it's obvious the US government brought this on to their people. don't understand why there are still people speculating that this could have been terrorist activity. if you people are still so DELUDED, why not look at the facts surrounding the pentagon. the most surveillance/guarded place on earth, and yet there is only one measly disoriented video released to the public later to be have been deemed tampered with. you ppl are just a bunch of airheads going on a power trip.
ayaseele 3 years ago 2
well said
skyarcher 3 years ago
@ayaseele The muslims have had a jihad against the West, long before 911. Do some research before you print such stupidity.
Auggie56 5 months ago
hahah
don't forget, burn isr l
tuckleberry 3 years ago
sorry about last comment diddnt whach all of the video
frodospicer 3 years ago
ok watch out look before u leap and watch your language
skyarcher 3 years ago
you said in the discription that it was 911 fotage it wasnt even in america u dumbfuck it has nothing to do with 911
frodospicer 3 years ago
They are both real, but skyarcher is a fake dumbfuck.
zildjiandrummr12 3 years ago
So you have seen a lighter hollow object hit a denser heaver object before and the lighter hollow object passes straight through without dedorming in any way and breaking newtons laws of motion? Where have you seen this ?
skyarcher 3 years ago
both are real, idiot!
Lelel000 3 years ago
So you have seen a lighter hollow object hit a denser heaver object before and the lighter hollow object passes straight through without dedorming in any way and breaking newtons laws of motion? Where have you seen this ?
skyarcher 3 years ago
I don t quite get your point, what i meant was that both crash are real, because in the video you ask "wich one is faked?", I am getting the whole picture here? Later;)
Lelel000 3 years ago
No you are not. The CNN 911 footage is faked. If you would like to find out more info watch september clues on my channel.
skyarcher 3 years ago
You have low-life idiot written all over your forehead.
zildjiandrummr12 3 years ago 3
Whats your point?
largebottlesofcider 3 years ago
Which one do you think is real and which on do you think is faked?
skyarcher 3 years ago
Uhm.....;-)
PollenB 3 years ago