Actually, I prefer Pollini to Horowitz, but he's definitely not the fastest I've heard. He is very musical though. I love his clarity and note separation, as well as that phrasing.
I thought he weaved a nice musical mood overall. I was listening to Barenboim give a masterclass (10 parts). It's was really quite interesting. Valentina Lisitsa is another pianist I enjoy. There are probably some fantastic technicians out there in terms of speed, but they let speed reign over musicality sometimes.
Lisitsa's recording is fast but bland, mechanical, a technical exercise. Pollini's performance is more mature, nuanced in many different ways (dynamics, accents, overall musicianship)
@zipollini just listened to this piece and I agree what a difference between Pollini's performance versus Lisitsa's
performance.....I heard this piece by Chopin in a different light....remarkable! P.S. I still love listening to Valentina and she is a wonderful pianist.
This piece is hard. I'm 14, played for 8 years, have perfect pitch, and have been learning this for a month. LOL Still doing it slo-mo and hands separate.
@ThePandaGun and you re stating all that for what??? if you wanted to say it is difficult just say it man... no offence but it doesn't give anything useful to the comment list.... as much as i could state other ignorants killing themselves i chose this comment cause, well.... randomly
@ThePandaGun May I ask you if you usually learn before one hand and then the other? I've been told to learn the lines reading with both my hands at the same time but I find it too difficult sometime.
@kiaragre I'm almost finished, and the way I was taught was to learn and memorize a section with the left hand, then the right hand. After that I would put the section together, and then when I had the whole piece my teacher showed me how to speed it up.
1:40 until the end,...that's jus ridicoulus how something like that was composed in the 19th century.. it is eternal, so powerful, so breathtaking, and of course a wonderful playing by Pollini..chapeau!
My friend says this is one of the easier Chopin etudes. He says this is a finger study you learn as a kid. Is this true? Because it sounds mighty hard to me! :(
@brassmonkeyjew lol naw this is not a finger study. i learned to play the piano, the first thing that you'd look at is scales, you'd study that and revise over notes and practise chords and dynamics. this is a masterpiece and incredibly hard, and only few musicians could ever play this, not every child taught piano is given it as a mere 'finger study'. its too complex in pace, dynamics and in general composition. you'd have to be some one in a million talented kid :)
@DeepPhilosopher5 - it depends on the school of which you speak. Studying this with Gyorgy Sandor,a student of Bartok, it was not the intrinsic muscles doing all the work - it was a combo of intrinsics, wrist, forearm and upperarm. Now if you're talking Russian school, then we have a different situation. And may I ask you this - do you buy into the French school i.e. Isidore Phillipe (sp?) with his independence of the fingers exercises? Just curious.
@brassmonkeyjew this is actually one of the hardest Chopin etudes along with the ocean etude, my teacher gives everybody in our studio one of them to work on because they take the most time to master
THIS IS IT! THE RIGHT DYNAMICS, TIMING, CONTROL, TEMPO IS GREAT. HIS LEFT AND RIGHT HAND ARE TOTALLY IN SYNC!!!! THIS VERSION IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR out of all other performances in youtube this is the best and awesome playing!@#!#%@#$^$%*&%
@monokomint - I couldn't agree more. You have said everything I've always wanted to say about this piece. Richter and Argerich - faster than lightning, Richter missing more notes in the long run; Pollini - sublime perfection. I heard him play a Chopin concert in Japan which was my reason for re-visiting the Bb minor sonata, the Barcarolle, and a vast number of the preludes, the d minor especially. What a fantastic player and nice guy all around.
My favorite Chopin etude, ALWAYS!!! And Pollini's interpretation is my favorite for this piece... the tempo is dynamic but not too fast like that of many others....
I'm sorry i dont appreciate this version because it is a technision just driving nails the impefections of my brothers 10 4 take chopin to a whole different level
Haha very true. I would love to see someone try to sight read this piece. Either painfully slow or a trainwreck, likely both. There's so much nuance in this piece.
You can try to play some song from Chopin but not very hard, but with scales and App. such as Etude Op.10 No.1, and play some with chords such as Etude Op.10 No.3 "Tristesse", then try to play much harder songs like Op.10 no.12 "Revolutionary", and you will find that it is much easier
op25 n11 is almost EASY.. if only you use chopin's fingering x 2 y 1 (x.y=5.4 or 4.3 point by point) with a polyritmic figure 4 4 4 on 6 6. (I play it pretty well and I'm NOT a virtuoso) sorry for my english. e-mail me for major exlplanation.
the main difficulty about Op. 25/11 it is the endurance. I would not call it easy though. it does have a main fingering pattern uttered throughout the entire piece.
the problem of endurance is striktly connected to the fingering pattern. It is not enough to use the right fingering, you also must create a circle (hoola-op like) using the down-up movement of the wrist.:(5-2)down (4-1)up, in a roundely that goes by itself (sorry for my fake english)
First, learn hands separately paying attention to all details. Then put both hands together, SLOWLY, and gradually work it up to speed over a series of months.
Okay, weeks! if you're very gifted. But remember, what we hear as an Argerich or Pollini or Gould performance, is often a piece that has been in their repertoire for years and that has matured over that time. Sometimes, it's a piece they've been playing for decades.
As far as I have ever heard, as far as I will ever hear, I do not think I have ever or will ever come across an interpretation of this piece that is so terrifyingly accurate.
Pollini's technical execution here is simply second to none.
(Ignoring everything else) A pianist's first aim in a piece like this is clarity. The second is speed. You know you've done a good job when you have both speed and clarity.
Pollini è decisamente meglio di Michelangeli. Soprattutto come persona. Ricordo che Michelangeli ha dato tanta fama alla sua spocchia da non essere neanche ricevuto dal conte Chigi in persona il giorno che si degnò di andarlo a trovare.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i cannot understand why people are so amazed with pollini's playing. i find this recording boring with almost no dynamics.. please listen to horowitz playing this. its one click away
speed doesnt mean everything in playing... it does play a major role in this piece but clarity is mucch more important, richters interpretation had clarity but this has much more clarity due to its (more calm) speed
Okay, if you keep on insisting the point that playing it blurry is unacceptable, I will tell you what, Go play this etude, and do it without any pedals, or open a midi file, and play it without any slurs.
I know what it sounds like. Apparently you don't understand what I am saying. Acoustics, overpedaling, and lacking technique=fingers holding too long are the only ways to make something blurry. Good recording equipment will catch every single note no matter how much pedal there is. Thus the only explanation for the blurriness in other videos on youtube is the poor sound quality or acoustics.
Pollini è pianista stupendo.. non capisco l'avversione di molti italiani per lui... è uno degli artisti che fanno onore al nostro paese e alla musica intera...Potrà essere simpatico o meno ma è un super grande.. Mi spiace che abbia partecipato a trasmissione di quello scemo di Fabio Fazio, che non ha saputo intervistarlo e forse non ne ha il cervello(domanda più intelligente: a cosa pensa mentre suona? >>>forse a un piatto di ravioli.
I agree, I think both are as good. The important thing I think is the clarity in the right hand with the speed. The last thing I'll say is that I always like to listen to Horowitz version cause it's always different
Pollini frequently ends his encores with this piece - I've heard him do this several times in London - and, really, people, this is NOTHING to the excitement he generates in the concert hall. I'll post the evidence soon...
My first acquaintance with this work was through Horowitz' 1963 recording which became my benchmark. So, upon hearing Pollini's interpretation a little later on, I was not impressed, as his did not contain the more easily accessible gestures as in Horowitz'. But as I grew older I came to appreciate the more objective playing of Pollini. He displaced my Horowitz paradigm and now I am amazed by the way through completely objective means, Pollini is able to communicate the excitement of this etude.
The piano used in his recordings is 'bright' (similar to Gould's perhaps), little studio resonance/echo, every note is clear no matter at what tempo.
At first this clarity takes some getting used to, after a while it seems perfect -- probably closer to what Chopin would have heard himself, and makes sense of the metronome markings.
Pollini and Gould pedal lightly (if at all), so their recordings translate well in current audio compressions light on data.
actually Pollini uses a lot of pedal here, listen carefully. The fact that everything seems so clear despite all that pedal is the really amazing thing! It shows how perfect the pedal use is and how powerful the articulation is. If you want to hear no pedal in this piece, look for Geza Anda's live performance from the '50s.
I wanted to say the same voolare but it seems you have already said it, so I must agree with you. He used way to much pedal and you must be careful using pedal in a song that is extremely fast, because you can quite easily mix a horde of notes making it sound like a chord of a horrible coincidence. But without a doubt, he really did do a good job.
if there were a lot of pedal in his playing here then you'd never hear what you're hearing. the tempo and technique required for this piece means you can get away with very, very limited pedal.
This is beautiful...
KillingKunoichi 6 days ago
a performance worth the songs of a thousand nymphs
chrissyluvspeace 3 months ago
My favourite performances are this one, and the horowitz one! Both great performances by great artists
Choltik 4 months ago
Hell of performance!!! One of the best I've seen
rodrigoantoniosilva7 5 months ago
veri good nice
twgirl1 6 months ago
what a beast.
88alan8800 6 months ago 8
BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sevcik2 7 months ago
Richter is one of the pianists that played this very fast, but still managed to make it very musical.
robertslistening 7 months ago
Actually, I prefer Pollini to Horowitz, but he's definitely not the fastest I've heard. He is very musical though. I love his clarity and note separation, as well as that phrasing.
I thought he weaved a nice musical mood overall. I was listening to Barenboim give a masterclass (10 parts). It's was really quite interesting. Valentina Lisitsa is another pianist I enjoy. There are probably some fantastic technicians out there in terms of speed, but they let speed reign over musicality sometimes.
robertslistening 7 months ago
I prefer Horowitz's version over this one.
Both are astounding and beyond the level any average piano artist can ever hope to reach.
Also Richter's performance of this piece is incredible..but way too fast imho.
Fischettiful 8 months ago
This is absolutely beautiful!
trschaefer 8 months ago
wow O.O
krisevan1 10 months ago
the version by Horowitz is also outstanding :)
medoooc 10 months ago 2
So.... 13 people obviously have either no ears or no brain...
limwonhee1 10 months ago 11
wow, hes good.
fr3d420 10 months ago
this is the best performance of this etude, everything about this etude is magical, with an unbelievable sound quality
wagneristhebest 11 months ago
I saw him LIVE. haha
BVILLE92 1 year ago
this guy made account for just one video... cool.
kaboom195 1 year ago 2
it feels sticky
claudeleason 1 year ago
just great music. This piece just make me feel alive. :D
I love Chopin and this is just the top of my favorite music list (for now)
18kyleXYZ 1 year ago
just great music. This piece just make me feel alive. :D
18kyleXYZ 1 year ago
Lisitsa's recording is fast but bland, mechanical, a technical exercise. Pollini's performance is more mature, nuanced in many different ways (dynamics, accents, overall musicianship)
zipollini 1 year ago 2
@zipollini just listened to this piece and I agree what a difference between Pollini's performance versus Lisitsa's
performance.....I heard this piece by Chopin in a different light....remarkable! P.S. I still love listening to Valentina and she is a wonderful pianist.
ANewAttitude1 1 year ago
@ANewAttitude1 ABSOLUTELY AGREE!!!!!!!!!
ANewAttitude1 1 year ago
This is a carbon copy of Lisitsa's version. They are both perfect.
Rugghead98 1 year ago
@Rugghead98 No it's not. This has magical clarity and tone, Lisitsa's does not.
36beachbum 1 year ago
@Rugghead98 both wonderful artists but I heard notes that I didn't hear before in this version
ANewAttitude1 1 year ago
yes, this is good!
cowlikesbeef 1 year ago
He's the performer that every composer want to have!
donthinktoaviolin 1 year ago
fantastic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! bghfuaònginunaòornvtyòhuertp..oh sorry...my hands starded independently to run crazy on the keyboard...
kiaragre 1 year ago
Wauw! great performance!
Though I think Valentina plays it better :P
PianoBart958 1 year ago
One of the best performances
K46620 1 year ago
This is perfection.
Just like Pollini's all interpretations of Chopin's etudes.
This recording he did in 1972, is by far the best ever, in my opinion.
iWillBlockYou 1 year ago
the best etude's perf : pollini :)
v4liumfrance 1 year ago
This piece is hard. I'm 14, played for 8 years, have perfect pitch, and have been learning this for a month. LOL Still doing it slo-mo and hands separate.
ThePandaGun 1 year ago
@ThePandaGun Lucky kid.
Supermassively 1 year ago
@ThePandaGun Haha I have perfect pitch aswell, *youtube high five*
cammywatt95 1 year ago
@ThePandaGun
I can imagine it's difficult having shorter fingers.....when putting it all together, good luck. =]
Faeness 1 year ago
@ThePandaGun and you re stating all that for what??? if you wanted to say it is difficult just say it man... no offence but it doesn't give anything useful to the comment list.... as much as i could state other ignorants killing themselves i chose this comment cause, well.... randomly
thats it
no ofence again
alejandrothefader 1 year ago
@alejandrothefader None taken, I get what you're saying.
ThePandaGun 1 year ago
@ThePandaGun ;)
alejandrothefader 1 year ago
@ThePandaGun May I ask you if you usually learn before one hand and then the other? I've been told to learn the lines reading with both my hands at the same time but I find it too difficult sometime.
kiaragre 1 year ago
@kiaragre I'm almost finished, and the way I was taught was to learn and memorize a section with the left hand, then the right hand. After that I would put the section together, and then when I had the whole piece my teacher showed me how to speed it up.
ThePandaGun 1 year ago
one of the absolute best without a doubt...
jtdendy 1 year ago
I love his interpretation of 1:47 - 1:53 and the picture change is perfect for that moment in the piece.
daytonmlivingston 1 year ago
Yeah this is Op.10 No.4 if you didnt know, your videos intro slide says no.12.
daytonmlivingston 1 year ago
@daytonmlivingston Yes, I noticed after uploading...
I was intending to upload op.10 No. 12 as well, so...
Anyway, thanks for the info
geostil 1 year ago
12 people are faggot
a83692128 1 year ago
@a83692128 One person is a dumbass. You.
Supermassively 1 year ago
@Supermassively another person is retard, you
a83692128 1 year ago
@a83692128 Nice English, dumbass.
Supermassively 1 year ago
@Supermassively nice ass, dumb retard :D
a83692128 1 year ago
@a83692128 Wow, you're looking at my ass? So you're gay? Well, I guess I'll take the compliment anyway.
Supermassively 1 year ago
@Supermassively whats the problem with being gay you homophobic...
tho i am not gay:D
a83692128 1 year ago
powerfull but gracefull... amazing man he must have been
jileel 1 year ago
1:40 until the end,...that's jus ridicoulus how something like that was composed in the 19th century.. it is eternal, so powerful, so breathtaking, and of course a wonderful playing by Pollini..chapeau!
genomos90 1 year ago
My teacher thinks I might be able to play this and I'm 12!
simersonic1 1 year ago
@simersonic1 you probably could... but could you play it well?
openmindspace 1 year ago
@simersonic1 - and your point is?
argerichluvr 1 year ago
As this is a "study", and many renditions are really great, please listen to Richter. I wonder what is your opinion.
rubendow 1 year ago
Excellent version but Richter is the best on this piece.
AndreAx1985 1 year ago
@AndreAx1985 - Let's agree to disagree.
argerichluvr 1 year ago
@AndreAx1985 I think he plays almost everything too fast.
thisismeplusyou 1 year ago
i love this etude
baboon500 1 year ago
pollini number one pianist in the 20th century
xxxxx123456789xxxxx1 1 year ago
its the true version... and berezovsky its the other animal version!
mansell3454 1 year ago
This version is the BEST. Even better than freddy kempf's. Nothing can beat this.
htsea 1 year ago
My friend says this is one of the easier Chopin etudes. He says this is a finger study you learn as a kid. Is this true? Because it sounds mighty hard to me! :(
brassmonkeyjew 1 year ago
@brassmonkeyjew Seeing any of the etudes as just a 'finger study' is seriously missing the point.
Haeronthegreat 1 year ago
@brassmonkeyjew It have to a very talented kid then. Some people learn etudes early on, but very few can play them any near a professionell level.
semicroma 1 year ago
@brassmonkeyjew lol naw this is not a finger study. i learned to play the piano, the first thing that you'd look at is scales, you'd study that and revise over notes and practise chords and dynamics. this is a masterpiece and incredibly hard, and only few musicians could ever play this, not every child taught piano is given it as a mere 'finger study'. its too complex in pace, dynamics and in general composition. you'd have to be some one in a million talented kid :)
lisamconveyness 1 year ago
@brassmonkeyjew You just need strong finger muscles, which actually takes quite a lot of practice. :)
DeepPhilosopher5 1 year ago
@DeepPhilosopher5 - it depends on the school of which you speak. Studying this with Gyorgy Sandor,a student of Bartok, it was not the intrinsic muscles doing all the work - it was a combo of intrinsics, wrist, forearm and upperarm. Now if you're talking Russian school, then we have a different situation. And may I ask you this - do you buy into the French school i.e. Isidore Phillipe (sp?) with his independence of the fingers exercises? Just curious.
argerichluvr 1 year ago
@brassmonkeyjew this is actually one of the hardest Chopin etudes along with the ocean etude, my teacher gives everybody in our studio one of them to work on because they take the most time to master
TTakach999 1 year ago
excellent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
johannesbrahms1897 1 year ago
excellent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
johannesbrahms1897 1 year ago
also listen
Mennan Bërveniku Chopin - Etude Op.10 No.4 [HQ]
erenbaki 1 year ago
i really like the difference of dynamics between his two hands
kleinerpogo 1 year ago
This is awesome. It's like two people playing playing this. He's so fast!
snowy4hk 1 year ago 3
i heard this in nodame cantabile
magewiz555 1 year ago 6
me too :D
good game btw
Amurpo 1 year ago
and anime but i just played the game XD
Amurpo 1 year ago
THIS IS IT! THE RIGHT DYNAMICS, TIMING, CONTROL, TEMPO IS GREAT. HIS LEFT AND RIGHT HAND ARE TOTALLY IN SYNC!!!! THIS VERSION IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR out of all other performances in youtube this is the best and awesome playing!@#!#%@#$^$%*&%
monokomint 1 year ago 128
@monokomint - I couldn't agree more. You have said everything I've always wanted to say about this piece. Richter and Argerich - faster than lightning, Richter missing more notes in the long run; Pollini - sublime perfection. I heard him play a Chopin concert in Japan which was my reason for re-visiting the Bb minor sonata, the Barcarolle, and a vast number of the preludes, the d minor especially. What a fantastic player and nice guy all around.
argerichluvr 1 year ago
Awesome interpretation. how someone could compose a piece like this is just mind-boggling.
JHighland1 1 year ago 5
Pollini, the greatest interpreter of Chopin's Etudes
Barbapippo 1 year ago 4
@Barbapippo very debatable
chazzithebrit 1 year ago
Chopin is definitely the best ! His music is always playful and energetic. Its almost like 2 people playing at the same time.
GovernmentGuy 2 years ago 49
ちゃんとメカニックを理解して、指を鍛えそれなりの適正があってどりょくすればそう難しい極でもないですよ
といいつつ
月日が流れ少年おいやすく学なるもオッサン
nikinikinikita 2 years ago
this is very difficult !!! in terrible!! but is so fabolous!!!
Attila19101960 2 years ago 5
my fav etude ! :)))
pooh18000 2 years ago 4
My goodness this is my favorite etude by Chopin. I want to play it so bad...I just haven't gotten around to it. Too much other rep to learn too! :)
daughterofzion07 2 years ago
My favorite Chopin etude, ALWAYS!!! And Pollini's interpretation is my favorite for this piece... the tempo is dynamic but not too fast like that of many others....
U38066 2 years ago
i can listen to this all day and i won't be tired of it. i love it!
xlilxjenxjenx08 2 years ago 4
Incredible piece
Hardysamnin 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i play it in this tempo too
niitac 2 years ago
I'd love to hear it, why not post it?
pianomanthesecond 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm sorry i dont appreciate this version because it is a technision just driving nails the impefections of my brothers 10 4 take chopin to a whole different level
bandguyz24 2 years ago
sorry but Pollini has been quoted to be a 'paragon of virtuosity and musical excellence.'
mathpianist93 2 years ago
POLLINI è un GRANDISSIMO
SuperFranc2 2 years ago 4
I love Chopin
frederickfrederikfre 2 years ago 3
yessssssssssssssssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ceppov 2 years ago
Beautiful ..... !!!! AMAZING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
x3mMark0 2 years ago
beautiful!
1universalqueen1 2 years ago
The accuracy, and evenness of this performance is astounding
Liebromeistal 2 years ago 3
1:24 So THAT'S how Chopin really looks like! He's quite delicate.
Rufftyroff 2 years ago 7
Clean, yes.
adnukum 2 years ago 2
I hope Chopin lived longer so he can write more of these beautiful pieces.
medviation 2 years ago 3
his playing is like fresh snow that has just fallen from the sky. it's clean and beautiful beyond words could describe.
fuchion15 2 years ago 3
sviatoslav richter version is the best!!
gonzal0999 2 years ago
this one really sounds like the one in nodame cantabile.. :P
Kaderderz137 2 years ago
third season in the fall I can't wait!!
kantalope 2 years ago
SAME!
Kaderderz137 2 years ago
i really wihs i can play this but i dont think so. can anyone give me advice on how i can play hard songs good?
namihomnam 2 years ago
What I try doing is focus playing different sections separately over and over again until I get them right.
You could even try doing hands separately until you can play both the treble and bass at the same time.
AsmoTheDragon 2 years ago
"You could even try doing hands separately"
I thought one ALWAYS does so...
revilo178 2 years ago 3
Haha very true. I would love to see someone try to sight read this piece. Either painfully slow or a trainwreck, likely both. There's so much nuance in this piece.
I guess that's why it's an Etude.
youfreakinghippie 2 years ago 4
You can try to play some song from Chopin but not very hard, but with scales and App. such as Etude Op.10 No.1, and play some with chords such as Etude Op.10 No.3 "Tristesse", then try to play much harder songs like Op.10 no.12 "Revolutionary", and you will find that it is much easier
tonyngjichun 2 years ago
In my opinion Op.10 no.12 is easier thah Op.10 n.1
COCOONFABULA 2 years ago
yes, no.1 is one of the harder ones,
scottyschumann18 2 years ago
One of the hardest. Op.10 no.1,2, op.25 no.6,11 would be the hardest 4. This probably follows. Which is probably why I fail at it :(
trigalg693 2 years ago
op25 n11 is almost EASY.. if only you use chopin's fingering x 2 y 1 (x.y=5.4 or 4.3 point by point) with a polyritmic figure 4 4 4 on 6 6. (I play it pretty well and I'm NOT a virtuoso) sorry for my english. e-mail me for major exlplanation.
bachopinberg 2 years ago
the main difficulty about Op. 25/11 it is the endurance. I would not call it easy though. it does have a main fingering pattern uttered throughout the entire piece.
mathpianist93 2 years ago
the problem of endurance is striktly connected to the fingering pattern. It is not enough to use the right fingering, you also must create a circle (hoola-op like) using the down-up movement of the wrist.:(5-2)down (4-1)up, in a roundely that goes by itself (sorry for my fake english)
bachopinberg 2 years ago 3
me too! although I probably fail way worse than you do.
steelseahorse 2 years ago
@trigalg693
I totally agree with you.
qingqy 1 year ago
practise - a lot
birdbrain987 2 years ago
you have to 'slow practice', evenly, with NO pedal, and build your muscles up
scottyschumann18 2 years ago
First, learn hands separately paying attention to all details. Then put both hands together, SLOWLY, and gradually work it up to speed over a series of months.
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 2 years ago 3
months? :(
howtwosave 2 years ago
Okay, weeks! if you're very gifted. But remember, what we hear as an Argerich or Pollini or Gould performance, is often a piece that has been in their repertoire for years and that has matured over that time. Sometimes, it's a piece they've been playing for decades.
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 2 years ago
He is real winner in some etudes
nikinikinikita 2 years ago 4
Man, you just wonder sometimes, how amazing would it be to see the actual composers play these pieces!
Very nice chart.
Maxxorz12 2 years ago 3
where is the fucking silent movie, i want my money back >:(
air0804 2 years ago
As far as I have ever heard, as far as I will ever hear, I do not think I have ever or will ever come across an interpretation of this piece that is so terrifyingly accurate.
Pollini's technical execution here is simply second to none.
SilentViolins 2 years ago
one of my fav piece :P
ginnix1 2 years ago
Played perfectly, as are all his Chopin pieces, but I'm just wondering, is Pollini still alive?
Jokester94n 2 years ago
I saw his performance 3 nights ago in Hong Kong, I don't expect that I saw a Zombie on that day....
Desmonddd2002 2 years ago 3
there's a zombie on your laawnnn(8)
search for it on youtube, beautiful song!
jetibest 2 years ago
Genial.
susanadelorenzo 2 years ago
Perfect .
VuLeTrung 2 years ago
his etude is best play I think.
relaxanimal 2 years ago
(Ignoring everything else) A pianist's first aim in a piece like this is clarity. The second is speed. You know you've done a good job when you have both speed and clarity.
cleartailcat09 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
Angel94angel94 2 years ago
non diciamo cazzate all'inglese...pollini rimane il piu' grande pianista dopo michelangeli ...
e qui lo dimostra pienamente
Splex87 2 years ago 2
Pollini è decisamente meglio di Michelangeli. Soprattutto come persona. Ricordo che Michelangeli ha dato tanta fama alla sua spocchia da non essere neanche ricevuto dal conte Chigi in persona il giorno che si degnò di andarlo a trovare.
sergiobertani 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i cannot understand why people are so amazed with pollini's playing. i find this recording boring with almost no dynamics.. please listen to horowitz playing this. its one click away
splico17 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
pollini plays like chopin himself...
johnbaptistlulu 2 years ago
and you know how chopin plays because...?
fionasapple 2 years ago 3
Perfect time,perfect dinamics,perfect Pollini.
miliona1re 3 years ago 4
compare with richter is kind of slowly
crazychopin 3 years ago
speed doesnt mean everything in playing... it does play a major role in this piece but clarity is mucch more important, richters interpretation had clarity but this has much more clarity due to its (more calm) speed
maddorox 2 years ago
No, this is more clear because it is a better quality recording.
trigalg693 2 years ago
No because of more understanding of the piece
Desmonddd2002 2 years ago
Do you honestly think it is possible for a professional pianist with impeccable technique to play blurry? It's called acoustics.
trigalg693 2 years ago 2
Okay, if you keep on insisting the point that playing it blurry is unacceptable, I will tell you what, Go play this etude, and do it without any pedals, or open a midi file, and play it without any slurs.
Then you will find it how unhuman it sounds.
Desmonddd2002 2 years ago
I know what it sounds like. Apparently you don't understand what I am saying. Acoustics, overpedaling, and lacking technique=fingers holding too long are the only ways to make something blurry. Good recording equipment will catch every single note no matter how much pedal there is. Thus the only explanation for the blurriness in other videos on youtube is the poor sound quality or acoustics.
trigalg693 2 years ago
You have to hear the version by Gavrilov!! So much more exciting, crisp and less smudged! Also at a faster speed
mferrandi 3 years ago
no you have to hear Richter's Version
Coixxman 3 years ago 3
Pollini è pianista stupendo.. non capisco l'avversione di molti italiani per lui... è uno degli artisti che fanno onore al nostro paese e alla musica intera...Potrà essere simpatico o meno ma è un super grande.. Mi spiace che abbia partecipato a trasmissione di quello scemo di Fabio Fazio, che non ha saputo intervistarlo e forse non ne ha il cervello(domanda più intelligente: a cosa pensa mentre suona? >>>forse a un piatto di ravioli.
varenmoz 3 years ago
i think pollini's version for most of the chopin etudes have the best interpretation (no offense to all the other pianists)
Auswme 3 years ago
then you should listen to the one Valentina Lisitsa plays! (just search for her on youtube ;))
lucapuma 3 years ago
I agree, I think both are as good. The important thing I think is the clarity in the right hand with the speed. The last thing I'll say is that I always like to listen to Horowitz version cause it's always different
raxkar 3 years ago
yeah man, Lisitsa's performance rox. Personal opinion, Valentina's is the best 1.
marvinracer88 2 years ago
wow - i was actually thinking the same
neckojezioro123 3 years ago
Chopin was a crazy composer!super genius... =D
his works are really awesome..
battjames 3 years ago
Pollini frequently ends his encores with this piece - I've heard him do this several times in London - and, really, people, this is NOTHING to the excitement he generates in the concert hall. I'll post the evidence soon...
exponentu 3 years ago
THE BEST !!
nkbeach 3 years ago
My first acquaintance with this work was through Horowitz' 1963 recording which became my benchmark. So, upon hearing Pollini's interpretation a little later on, I was not impressed, as his did not contain the more easily accessible gestures as in Horowitz'. But as I grew older I came to appreciate the more objective playing of Pollini. He displaced my Horowitz paradigm and now I am amazed by the way through completely objective means, Pollini is able to communicate the excitement of this etude.
utubuser10 3 years ago
Pollini's Chopin! Rock and roll!!
AnthonyBlunt 3 years ago
This is absolutely AMAZING!!!! really!! fuck,, it's beyond anything I've ever heard.
WigridXD 3 years ago
Me too -- the best (for my taste).
The piano used in his recordings is 'bright' (similar to Gould's perhaps), little studio resonance/echo, every note is clear no matter at what tempo.
At first this clarity takes some getting used to, after a while it seems perfect -- probably closer to what Chopin would have heard himself, and makes sense of the metronome markings.
Pollini and Gould pedal lightly (if at all), so their recordings translate well in current audio compressions light on data.
PaulBartonPiano 3 years ago 2
actually Pollini uses a lot of pedal here, listen carefully. The fact that everything seems so clear despite all that pedal is the really amazing thing! It shows how perfect the pedal use is and how powerful the articulation is. If you want to hear no pedal in this piece, look for Geza Anda's live performance from the '50s.
voolare 3 years ago
I wanted to say the same voolare but it seems you have already said it, so I must agree with you. He used way to much pedal and you must be careful using pedal in a song that is extremely fast, because you can quite easily mix a horde of notes making it sound like a chord of a horrible coincidence. But without a doubt, he really did do a good job.
Drbolla345 3 years ago
if there were a lot of pedal in his playing here then you'd never hear what you're hearing. the tempo and technique required for this piece means you can get away with very, very limited pedal.
KennYWooD2 2 years ago
WOW!!!!!!
gloriaelsa123 3 years ago
Najlepsze wykonanie 4. z op.10 etiudy.
Inni grają za szybko i za "wściekle".
Grandioso maestro!
amabeline 3 years ago
Pollini plays like a little 'DOLL'. Technically perfect and altogether satisfying.
vladdegs 3 years ago 2
To się nazywa mistrzowskie wykonanie! Mało kto potrafi wydobyć z tej etiudy to co najlepsze. Jej lekkość, brawurę, linię melodyczną.
bajeczka71 3 years ago