@felpaluche, is your paucity of words a reflection of your intellectual deficit? Is it indicative of the size of your penis? God, I hope not, for my anal joy is greater with a telephone pole than with a sausage. That reminds me, I need to cook some bratwursts for tonight....
What percentage of adult men who watch videos like this one, or Chomsky / Buckley / Vidal videos would you suppose are GAY? Yet here I sit, vehemently denying to some that I am a Captain on the Fudge Packer team. Yes, it is SO likely that heterosexual men are so infatuated with such topics.
Ah, could any of you 'sensitive' men help me come out of the closet?
Or, could we exchange emails with the prospect of meeting for a little 'backrub time'? (wink wink).
@xtrsprts WFB offered to punch that pornographer and sodomite, Gore Vidal, for calling him a 'crypto-Nazi'. Since he is no longer here to proffer a similar offer, and as I cannot see any utility in doing so on his behalf via this medium, I will instead impute you do this dishonor to a great man out of sodomitic disregard for your betters, just as Vidal did.
The way Buckley calls out McGovern for the classic 'flip-flop' fallacy is just incredible. How frequently do we hear politicians and our own peers support one side, only to revert to a completely defensive stances against it when the given scenario is framed in a different light. So glad that Buckley addressed that type of fallacy, as it will remind me to do the same, should I find myself in a similar circumstance.
@SclafaniBagni I McGovern was pretty consistent for a politician here, more than Nixon. Buckley was just acting as the conservative movement's bully puppet here. The Bill O'Reilly of Yesteryears. You see how he was getting worked up, not letting George get a word in. Typical buffoonery by the old crypto-nazi. The boston/harvard quote shows how proud Bill was of his hate for the academia. Just another creationist hack with an accent. Glad his son turned out better.
@xtrmsprts K well I wasn't talking about Nixon here, and I wasn't calling out libs or conservatives either, so your anger is misplaced. I was talking about a common fallacy that McGovern showed. Could you be willing to concede that McCovern had trapped himself within his own disingenuous, circular logic? I won't hold my breath. If you want to use my comment as an excuse for ad hominem diatribe (you know the old schtick: call 'em Nazis - that'll show 'em!), by all means tell us what irks you.
@SclafaniBagni To begin with you didn't even hear what McGovern was saying,what you heard was Buckley's artful misstating of McGovern's position that he expressed with an air of condescension and outrage.Bill knew he'd have to raise his voice,interrupt and generally act like a thug to intimidate George. What's cut here is McGovern's calm & witty response to the rabid buckley.As for nazi,well young buckley and others were responsible for an anti-semitic hate crime in Sharron a long time ago.
@xtrmsprts I didn't hear McGovern and neither did you. And Buckley founded National Review as a means of separating his ideology from an often anti-semitic conservative voice in the early 50's. You can talk about a young Buckley all you want, but if your mission is to defend the liberal cause at any opportunity, then we can get into Robert Byrd as well.
@SclafaniBagni All right good,so finally we're coming clean.Yes, you didn't hear a word out of McGovern and still made a long aimless criticism about his statements in your capacity as a foot-soldier of the right wing.And lets not be sentimental,Bill made the National Review for profit and self-aggrandizement...daddy buckley's oil money wasn't going to last forever.Thru the NR,Bill sought to demonize the civil rights movement.We're really talking about a pretty degenerate character here
@xtrmsprts you didn't hear a word out of mcgovern and still was quick to jump on his side, but let's just ignore that shall we. shame on buckley for creating a for-profit magazine, he joins the likes of other charlatans such as Highlights and Boy's Life. Perhaps you could find evidence of his attack on the civil rights movement, since you failed to do so when I called you out on calling him an anti-semite.
@xtrmsprts And why is your channel filled with pictures and videos of Buckley? This is bizarre, at best it's a hidden appreciation for the man, at worst it's an obsession in the same vain of Buffalo Bill...very interesting!
@SclafaniBagni I admire the man's verbal prowess. Also the bond exists because I've had a sesquipedalian spark quite independently of the influence of Bill and when I realized how elongated his vocabulary was too, I knew I'd found a kindred soul :) lol Moreover, I consider myself economically conservative.See I'm not prejudiced. Personally, don't agree with him on many issues like evolution, racism,religion, etc But I can academically appreciate his talents, unlike most partisan observers
@xtrmsprts i have no problem expressing my distaste for those who have a way of dismissing evolution and racism. and im delighted to see that we've maybe found some common ground after all on Buckley, who is a very fascinating figure indeed. after having a back-and-forth such as this one, establishing any level of mutual common ground is always extremely refreshing! have a great day
@SclafaniBagni Yeah, Bill was enjoyable to watch. My old man really likes him. I like his prose style and compared to the hacks today, Bill was highly civil. Even though I depart from his views greatly on some matters, I figured noone's perfect. I read Chris buckley's losing mum and pup book, nice little funny sarcastic read about Bill and Pat. Anyway, thanks! And a great day to you as well, sir!
So many liberals, like McGovern in this clip, became completely disarmed when debating Buckley because he challenged the false premises on which liberalism so frequently operates. If one does not accept the assumptions of modern statism/liberalism, such as one opposes clean air and water if one opposes strict environmental regulations, they literally do not know what to do. Statism is a house of cards and conservatism is the wind of truth.
Yes and unfortunately that summarizes Mr Buckley' public life, such as it was, entertaining. So "entertaining" in fact, that we didn't realize we were being entertained and thought we were getting educated until it was too late.
A great deal if entertainment with very little substance.
The diagnosis of subject, g175wb, is as follows: acute homosexual panic, Electra complex, anal- fixated, transference syndrome.
Subject is obsessed with other; similar to Chapman/ Lennon case. Rages against transferrence object.
Prognosis: negative.
TemplarLeonem 4 days ago
Ignore thw drooling idiocy of 'temp'I'arleonem'. It is only that retard, g17swb again.
Seme prattle, same rank imposture.
TemplarLeonem 1 week ago
@felpaluche, is your paucity of words a reflection of your intellectual deficit? Is it indicative of the size of your penis? God, I hope not, for my anal joy is greater with a telephone pole than with a sausage. That reminds me, I need to cook some bratwursts for tonight....
TempIarLeonem 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What percentage of adult men who watch videos like this one, or Chomsky / Buckley / Vidal videos would you suppose are GAY? Yet here I sit, vehemently denying to some that I am a Captain on the Fudge Packer team. Yes, it is SO likely that heterosexual men are so infatuated with such topics.
Ah, could any of you 'sensitive' men help me come out of the closet?
Or, could we exchange emails with the prospect of meeting for a little 'backrub time'? (wink wink).
TempIarLeonem 1 week ago
@xtrsprts WFB offered to punch that pornographer and sodomite, Gore Vidal, for calling him a 'crypto-Nazi'. Since he is no longer here to proffer a similar offer, and as I cannot see any utility in doing so on his behalf via this medium, I will instead impute you do this dishonor to a great man out of sodomitic disregard for your betters, just as Vidal did.
TemplarLeonem 1 week ago
good one
felpaluche 2 months ago
The way Buckley calls out McGovern for the classic 'flip-flop' fallacy is just incredible. How frequently do we hear politicians and our own peers support one side, only to revert to a completely defensive stances against it when the given scenario is framed in a different light. So glad that Buckley addressed that type of fallacy, as it will remind me to do the same, should I find myself in a similar circumstance.
SclafaniBagni 9 months ago
@SclafaniBagni I McGovern was pretty consistent for a politician here, more than Nixon. Buckley was just acting as the conservative movement's bully puppet here. The Bill O'Reilly of Yesteryears. You see how he was getting worked up, not letting George get a word in. Typical buffoonery by the old crypto-nazi. The boston/harvard quote shows how proud Bill was of his hate for the academia. Just another creationist hack with an accent. Glad his son turned out better.
xtrmsprts 9 months ago
@xtrmsprts K well I wasn't talking about Nixon here, and I wasn't calling out libs or conservatives either, so your anger is misplaced. I was talking about a common fallacy that McGovern showed. Could you be willing to concede that McCovern had trapped himself within his own disingenuous, circular logic? I won't hold my breath. If you want to use my comment as an excuse for ad hominem diatribe (you know the old schtick: call 'em Nazis - that'll show 'em!), by all means tell us what irks you.
SclafaniBagni 9 months ago
@SclafaniBagni To begin with you didn't even hear what McGovern was saying,what you heard was Buckley's artful misstating of McGovern's position that he expressed with an air of condescension and outrage.Bill knew he'd have to raise his voice,interrupt and generally act like a thug to intimidate George. What's cut here is McGovern's calm & witty response to the rabid buckley.As for nazi,well young buckley and others were responsible for an anti-semitic hate crime in Sharron a long time ago.
xtrmsprts 9 months ago
@xtrmsprts I didn't hear McGovern and neither did you. And Buckley founded National Review as a means of separating his ideology from an often anti-semitic conservative voice in the early 50's. You can talk about a young Buckley all you want, but if your mission is to defend the liberal cause at any opportunity, then we can get into Robert Byrd as well.
SclafaniBagni 9 months ago
@SclafaniBagni All right good,so finally we're coming clean.Yes, you didn't hear a word out of McGovern and still made a long aimless criticism about his statements in your capacity as a foot-soldier of the right wing.And lets not be sentimental,Bill made the National Review for profit and self-aggrandizement...daddy buckley's oil money wasn't going to last forever.Thru the NR,Bill sought to demonize the civil rights movement.We're really talking about a pretty degenerate character here
xtrmsprts 9 months ago
@xtrmsprts you didn't hear a word out of mcgovern and still was quick to jump on his side, but let's just ignore that shall we. shame on buckley for creating a for-profit magazine, he joins the likes of other charlatans such as Highlights and Boy's Life. Perhaps you could find evidence of his attack on the civil rights movement, since you failed to do so when I called you out on calling him an anti-semite.
SclafaniBagni 9 months ago
@xtrmsprts And why is your channel filled with pictures and videos of Buckley? This is bizarre, at best it's a hidden appreciation for the man, at worst it's an obsession in the same vain of Buffalo Bill...very interesting!
SclafaniBagni 9 months ago
@SclafaniBagni I admire the man's verbal prowess. Also the bond exists because I've had a sesquipedalian spark quite independently of the influence of Bill and when I realized how elongated his vocabulary was too, I knew I'd found a kindred soul :) lol Moreover, I consider myself economically conservative.See I'm not prejudiced. Personally, don't agree with him on many issues like evolution, racism,religion, etc But I can academically appreciate his talents, unlike most partisan observers
xtrmsprts 9 months ago
@xtrmsprts i have no problem expressing my distaste for those who have a way of dismissing evolution and racism. and im delighted to see that we've maybe found some common ground after all on Buckley, who is a very fascinating figure indeed. after having a back-and-forth such as this one, establishing any level of mutual common ground is always extremely refreshing! have a great day
SclafaniBagni 9 months ago
@SclafaniBagni Yeah, Bill was enjoyable to watch. My old man really likes him. I like his prose style and compared to the hacks today, Bill was highly civil. Even though I depart from his views greatly on some matters, I figured noone's perfect. I read Chris buckley's losing mum and pup book, nice little funny sarcastic read about Bill and Pat. Anyway, thanks! And a great day to you as well, sir!
xtrmsprts 9 months ago
Such a well-done tribute. I wish I could have known Mr. Buckley personally.
Detectivefiction 1 year ago 2
He has such a command of the English language
david52875 1 year ago
So many liberals, like McGovern in this clip, became completely disarmed when debating Buckley because he challenged the false premises on which liberalism so frequently operates. If one does not accept the assumptions of modern statism/liberalism, such as one opposes clean air and water if one opposes strict environmental regulations, they literally do not know what to do. Statism is a house of cards and conservatism is the wind of truth.
dmreeoogdaq 1 year ago
Yes and unfortunately that summarizes Mr Buckley' public life, such as it was, entertaining. So "entertaining" in fact, that we didn't realize we were being entertained and thought we were getting educated until it was too late.
A great deal if entertainment with very little substance.
William F Buckley RIP
MAYORGAGROUP 1 year ago
A great man, we are lessor because of his death.
YourNameHere1212 1 year ago
Im left wing but he is entertaining
murray1234567891011 1 year ago