Added: 3 years ago
From: MinimeDrummerBoi
Views: 55,679
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (366)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • j'ai la meme carte grpahique est mes performances sont largement mieu que ce truk --"

  • what video card do you have now?

  • @MrVinsanity25 5850.

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi

    niceeee,

    i had hd 4650 but i have upgarded to gts 450 1gb ddr5, it's pretty nice card for 1440x900.

    nice video man ;)

  • Also, This looks like a console game, it almost makes me sick x_x

  • dude 12 to 30 fps.i get like 40 to 50 fps on crysis on my xfx radeon hd 4650 on 1024x786 and all settings medium

  • @masterofnocrack Um precisely. 1024 x 728 is a low resolution...

    Doesn't matter now though, very old video.

  • @TheColorSpace This is an old video...

  • You can def up the ante with the textures- or even run high settings.

  • This game muzzleflash is restricting 20fps of the game while u shot

  • Guys, you need some teaching. I purchased this card for my system with a X4 2.9GHz processor.

    My brother purchased this card with his 2.1GHz X2 Processor.

    I get about 50 more frames than him in any game well ever play.

    Watch out for your processor.

  • @Acceptable76 Crysis doesn't even have Quad Core Support broseph, your point is invalid here ;D

  • @seether5000 Games in general my m8 :-)

  • I also have a 4650, but I can run it lag-free at 1600x900 with all settings on high and 2x AA

  • ive got question i know there lot of better graphic cards but can u tell me, is that card good enough to play games like battlefield etc. for next few years i aint got enough money to buy some more expensive one ;/

  • @LinkinParkFan219 Aim for a 5770.

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi Speaking of 5770, How's nvidia GTS 250?

  • @DoozyJr That's nice decent card, but I believe the 5770 does out perform it. Look up some benchmarks, not too certain about that.

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi I had a 5770. It worked great....for a little while. The dang thing died, all my games run horrible, and Crysis didnt run as well as I would of hoped. Maybe I just got a bad card. It was from Sapphire so watch out.

  • @Kuzo53 I only had one issue with Sapphire out of my 2 Sapphire cards. However, they replaced my 4890 free of charge.

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi Ya im getting all my money back and I think im going to buy from Nvidia. Btw impressive video i didnt know Crysis could run so well on this kind of card, even if it is on medium its still impressive.

  • @Kuzo53 My ex-roommate has a 5770 with an i7 920. I was playing Crysis on his PC at 1920x1080 everything set to "High" settings, and textures set to Very High. I have not reached any of the alien or zero-g levels in the game yet, but I was watching the framerate and it always got 30-50 fps pretty consistently. The 5770 was also at stock settings with the stock cooler. And for a last-gen mid-range card, I think that's pretty good. He got the XFX 5770 though, after his Sapphire 4890 died.

  • @LinkinParkFan219 Perfectly.

  • @LinkinParkFan219 i got this it good for little olde games like quake wars which is great lags sum on battlefield 2 but playable if u not so picky only game i had problem with was front line fuel of war

  • Tbh this is a good card but if you want a substantial performance gain at a decent price then get the 5770 or even the lower 5670. Will play crisis warhead at gamer settings @ 1600 res or below @30+ fps no probs. I know this because i use to have one.

    Upgraded to a 5870 now though :D

  • @FubuMushu Look at the date of the video...

    The 5 series were no were near in production.

    I currently have a 5850.

  • help!!!!!plz is 26fps in any game smooth?!plz i have radeon hd 4650 and wonder if aion runs smooth

  • @Gh3masterofrock 26FPS is a bit low. Try aiming for 30FPS.

  • Would this card play HD 1080p mkv movies without lag?

  • @RKhatkar34 Yes

  • would this be a good card for the new mmos comin out next year. im lookin into the dell xps17 any advice would be great

  • @LawAZ9 It'll be a decent card. Look at a 5770.

  • i want to buy:

    quad core processor

    4 GB of RAM

    4650 1GB ...

    on what settings will CRYSIS run at the frame rate at about 30+ ???

    i'm searching this answer fon quite a few days now !!! tnx guys ;)

  • @jani11 My guess is medium - high at a decent resolution.

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi thanks man ;)

  • i have this graficcard hd4650 and a 2,2 ghz prozessor, does it run in the highest resolution?=

  • IS 3870 BETTER THAN 4650??? I need to buy 4650 in few days, and I have 3650. Can somebody tell me which one is better???

  • @borkogamerr From my experience, the 3870 outperform the 4650

  • crysis is a bad game. and the graphics are showing it was released in 2007

  • Hey guys my specs: Windows Xp Sp3 Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 2.51GHZ 2GB Ram DDR2-800 160 GB HD - ST3160215A Intergrated ATI Radeon 2100 - 256MB PSU 350 Watts Choosing to upgrade the intergrated graphics to a Ati Radeon HD 4650 or Nvidia 9400 GT. Which one is best for in my case for my current specs and will i be able to play new games like GTa4? what do you think? Thanks
  • @ollie062 The 4650 performs better than the 9400GT

  • radeon 4850 512, phenom ii x4 965, 4 gb ddr3 1600, wd black hdd, win 7. can i run it with all the bells and whistles? monitor supports up to 1680x1050.

  • @dschultz6072

    Yes.

  • Comment removed

  • lag!!!!!!!!

  • @FlipazoneFilms

    Obviously you lose frames when you run Fraps...

  • @FlipazoneFilms this lags to you? fail

  • /watch?v=vjuDzsb3flc

  • @MrFrelis

    Really?

  • these are my settings:

    -Intel Pentium 4 CPU 2,66 ghz

    - 1 GB DDR2 RAM

    -Windows XP ( I will get 7 soon )

    If i would get a 4650, would I be able to play this game on low settings?

  • @dylandionrakiman

    I would say no. Not with that PT4.

  • @dylandionrakiman

    Pentium 4.

  • @dylandionrakiman not a chance.

  • i got radeon 4650 and crysis runs at 1024x720(i think) and medium and its only 25FPS! and i got 2gb ram, windows xp, dual core OC@ 3.4ghz

  • AMD Phenom™ II X2 545 Processor - 3.0 GHz - 2.0 GHz HT (4000 MT/s) - 6 MB L3 Cache Operating SystemGenuine Windows® 7 Home Premium RAM- 4GB - DDR2 - maximum RAM 4GB Graphics cardATI Radeon HD 4650 - 1GB dedicated memory Screen typeNone Hard drive500GB SATA 7200rpm Optical disk driveDVD-Rewriter Is this PC good enough to run Left 4 dead, crysis ECT with no lag?
  • @random94man

    Left 4 Dead, yes.

    Crysis, you can probably get away with low settings.

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi I hope you're kidding. Seriously a 500-600$ computer can't run a 3 year old game? I regret building a new computer, hardware is always a pain in the ass when it decides to break and it costs you an arm and a leg. Wow, I should have bought a ps3 or something. OR you're exaggerating because the recommended requirements are lower than that.

  • @junkietomato

    Doesn't matter how old the game is. Everyone knows that Crysis is really just that demanding. It was quite ahead of it's time when it was released and even modern video cards at the time struggled a bit.

    Recommended requirements varies throughout everyone. Those recommended requirements could work great on 1680x 1050, but somewhat sluggish at full 1080P. It's up to people to research on their own before purchasing anything.

    That's why they have benchmarks.

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi yes yes I know, it kinda failed when it was released because almost nobody could play it but still, I expected that 3 years later a custom built 500-600$ machine could run it.

  • @random94man

    i'd say medium - high with a native resolution of 1280 x 1024 :)

  • i play crysis on max using lower resolution but it gives 30 FPS

  • @Guyc00l

    The FPS will probably drop significantly during the more "intense" scenes.

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi it doesn't... or maybe my video card version is different from yours (1 gb ddr3) and since you are playing demo I played all the demo version too and the FPS are precisely 10-20 with all in max, even in the most intense cenes.

    I use windows 7 64 bits by the way...

  • @Guyc00l

    Mines DDR2; slower memory. 10 - 20FPS is way too unplayable for me.

    Either way, it was a decent card at the time. This video was quite old and I've done plenty of upgrades as shown in my videos. I now own an ASUS 5850.

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi Well i can play Metro 2033 in max settings without directx 11 so it's not an old card since you can play all the newst games in max settings of course if you play in medium it doesnt give even a little bit of lag witch makes the video card still good for this time but that video card you have now seems to be real great even because there is a gddr5 version and that must be fast as hell

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi If you go to notebookcheck website and search for our videocard you can see that there says 25-37 in the benchmark results... test with the benchmark too and check if you need newer drivers or something

  • @Guyc00l

    I no longer own the card. This video is old so I went from here to a 3870 to 4890 to now a 5850, but thanks for the tip.

  • You can get the texture quality, and all the secondary things to veryhigh and you'll have better grapics without loosing too much fps (around 2-5)

  • @milenent

    I've tried that before and I actually lost a lot FPS. Anyways, this video is old. I now own a 5850.

  • 0:47 omg i had no idea you could do that, i always shot at it alot

  • Gt220 or the HD4650? for gaming?

  • HD 4650

    My brother got an Gt220 and quad core and 6 gb ram and i got

    Hd4650 and dual core 2.6 and 2gb ram and i beat his computer

  • absolutely HD4650.

    Don't even bother to try to play games with 220. Old games like FEAR run in detail settings low only.

  • Gt220 or the HD4650? for gaming?

  • Not sure, look up some benchmarks.

  • @StupidRockersDK definetly the gt 220

  • Is the HD 4650 better than the GT220?

  • I don't know. Try looking up some benchmarks.

  • @JSgamerz HD4650

  • wow dood

    nice graps

    but i got a pc like ur

    and i got one with high specs

  • how do you play the game with a 4650

  • Um what?

  • Personally, I think the biggest noticeable difference is between medium and low. Atleast the colors look good, the texture doesn't look like it's crudely slapped on, and there's some sense of effects. High and Very High mostly just add more shaders.

  • @MetroidJunkie2007,

    xD, i think u should do some more research, <<<<< it adds some more shaders xDDD..

    Noticeable difference xD.... if u only knew the mathematics behind it... between low,,, medium,,,,high and very high settings :P.

  • @SynodCenturion Then it's probably just me. Atleast medium has basic shaders, low has none, the water even looks like a mirror. I'm just saying that, through normal play, the difference between low and medium is more significant than from medium to high.

  • @MetroidJunkie2007,

    No it's ok. I didnt mean to be in a offense. I just meant, ehm... going up from 200.000 to >3.000.000 triangles/sec with deferred lighting and dynamic shadows :P. is a huge difference.

  • damn, really nice graphics.

  • Thanks!

  • @BlueDragon1194 cant wait til i get my pc! ill be able to play thius on high! maybe very high! that gives damn much better graphics than medium :D

  • AMD Athlon II x2 215

    3 GB DDR2 RAM 667MhZ

    500GB HDD

    HD 5770

    Can I max it out with 30+ FPS? I know an hd 5770 can max it out but my processor will probably bottleneck the card so i wanna figure out how much fps the bottlenecked card can get.

  • You can always download the Crysis Benchmarking Tool.

  • yeah but i dont have the hd 5770 yet (I got it in my other comp that has an amd phenom x4) so I just wanna know.

  • I can't be sure but I'm gonna say it's going to play decently but that X2 215 is a big bottleneck.

  • @Haloroach

    I think you have 2 upgrade ram and gpu for better gaming... at least || X4 940 and 4gb 800mhz ram.

    If you would maxed out in this specs, you will have something around 20+ fps

  • Wow dude, do you collect videocards or something?

  • Lol no?

    I only owned 3 video cards throughout my upgrades: Diamond 4650, Sapphire 3870 & Sapphire 4890. My friend is using the 4650 and I've sold the 3870

  • Oh, ok. Just that every vid it seemed like you were showing the performance of different cards.

  • noob. it took u like 2 min to kill a boat lol

  • Right...

    I was trying so "hard".

  • @crysismon45

    it took me two minutes to kill ur mom in bed last night. dont be a retard on youtube please.

  • Lol, Jesus, some of the comments on here...

  • @WeTalkAbout your specs are great but the graphics card could've been like a 5770 or something in the 5XXX series. The 5970 i heard is really good

  • whats ur system specs

  • People need to read the description.

    Updated specs are always provided on my channel.

  • is this the agp version?

  • No PCI-Express 2.0.

  • Yes.

  • is a 4670 better than 4650?

  • Yes.

  • just got this card! my old 1 kept making my screen mess up..but it was old and i think it was broken.hope this 1 works and fixes that problem

  • 32 bit o 64 bit???

  • 32 bit.

  • get a 4890 there cheap now 200$ or a 4850 120$ at NCIX oh and dont get the xfx one its a revamp one it sucks get the asus 4890 and 4850 asus xfx or sappier there all good :D im getting a 4890 soon the 8600 gt sucks

  • Watch my earlier videos; I've upgraded to a 4890 a long time ago.

  • nice how is it?

  • It's doing well. I'm planning to upgrade to a 5850.

  • great man.

    I am building a very very cheap system with the 4650

  • Sounds good.

  • yes I have no damn money

  • AMD Athlon II X3 Triple Core 425 2.7 GHz

    8 GB DDR3

    1 TB (5400 RPM) SATA

    ATI Radeon HD 4650

    Can I run Crysis?

  • hell ya you can

  • @L0lk1ng No need for 8GB of DDR3, go down to 6. You should be able too.

  • Thank you for your time.

  • No problem.

  • ATI HD4650 1GB

    AMD Athlon X2 II 240(2,8GHz)

    1000GB HDD

    Windows 7 Home Premium

    Is this PC good enough to play Crysis or Modern Warfare 2 (Online) on 1024x768 or 1280x1024 on maybe medium details?

  • Yes.

  • Does the monitor have a big say in anything? I mean, if i have an old CRT-monitor will it make the graphics look worse?

  • no actualy the colors look much better on a crt hahahaha go figure w/e i still like my new 22 inch acer but yeah it u buy a glossy lcd screen it will look as good as a crt.... the monitor does not affect graphics overall tho...

  • It doesn't effect the graphics. The only thing it might effect is how you view your game.

  • I have a kestion for yah ;) well is the Sony vaio any good? The FW SERIES i mean it has windows 7 with i belive 4 GB RAM .5 TB HDD Space well wadaya think? can i prob run thy game? crysis? it does have HD 4650 Ure ANSWER WILL BE MUCH APRECIATED

  • Crysis at a decent setting.

  • Well you should be able to uninstall it. I've done it plenty of times.

    The game itself isn't that. It's a mediocre game that boasts in the visuals.

  • I don't remember how many gigs but I'm pretty sure you can uninstall it. Never heard of "sercum".

  • i heard 3870 is on par with 4650...just lower power, since you were able to compare, please tell me

  • From what I've personally experienced, the 3870 is faster.

  • Wow i didnt know that you could just turn off the jamming device in the game...I just kept shooting it until it blew up

  • i didnt evan touch it yet i beat the game lol

  • which is best? 4650 or 3870?

  • The 3870 outperformed the 4650 on my tests.

  • 3.8 ghz c2d O.o

  • Yes, on a stock cooler. Surprised myself.

  • Mo offense, but you kind of...suck.

  • Crysis isn't a game I play much.

    In addition to that, I was trying to draw attention in order to put a lot of things going on the screen.

  • @MinimeDrummerBoi I know. The graphics are great, but the game itself I've heard about doesn't sound too good.

  • I thought the game was fucking fun , one of my all time favorites and people probably say it sucks is because the gameplay was laggy to them

  • @revenant3154 Probably. Looks fun enough. I think I might try the game...

  • Quad Cores are the future.

  • wot would u say is better a intel quad core at 2.86ghz or duo care at 3.33ghz?

  • A dual core would be more sufficient at gaming since most games will only take advantage of 2 cores.

    However, games are starting to utilize 4 cores as technology advances so a quad core would be a better investment, especially for future games.

  • quad core alway better then duo. but it depend on what your use your pc for. If you play game online a lot, I suggest you use a quad core cpu is better.

  • quad core! get only 4 core processors!

  • your running this quite smooth, not bad. When I recorded my crysis videos it feels bit laggy in game but when you watch video its alot nicer

  • monster cpu!

  • well its more like so so between minimum to reccomended

  • i have the minimum for processor power so i can run this with medium to high settings on 1024 x 768

  • this game looks gr8. i just bought dis card sumtime ago... i want to know on which setting can dis game run on the res of 1024 by 768?

  • Mix of medium and highs.

  • dats gud to know.... i can't expect anymore out of it den the price for which it is.... just a bang for the buck i say!

  • this game looks like it would like pretty good even on low settings.

  • HD 4650+ E8400  OR

    HD 4770 + E7400

  • 4770 + E7400.

  • just a little update, i bought this card in AGP and im using it with my pentium 4.

    games are working fine, im able to run deadspace on max settings as well as crysis on medium settings.

    its all good!

  • I am Getting the 4650 with the intel core 2 duo t6600 will I be able to run this at medium? Please help!!

  • At a decent resolution yes.

  • i just ordered the Radeon 4650 HD 512mb AGP card,

    and i have a pentium 4 2.8 ghz.

    will i be able to run games like this????

    i think i should be able to

  • Not with that PT4. That'll be bottlenecking your 4650.

  • what if i overclock my CPU?

  • It'll still somewhat bottleneck. I guess it'll be sufficient.

  • alright, well hopefully it wont be too bad.

    thx

  • how good must the computer be to play this game ( sry for bad english "