ive got question i know there lot of better graphic cards but can u tell me, is that card good enough to play games like battlefield etc. for next few years i aint got enough money to buy some more expensive one ;/
@MinimeDrummerBoi I had a 5770. It worked great....for a little while. The dang thing died, all my games run horrible, and Crysis didnt run as well as I would of hoped. Maybe I just got a bad card. It was from Sapphire so watch out.
@MinimeDrummerBoi Ya im getting all my money back and I think im going to buy from Nvidia. Btw impressive video i didnt know Crysis could run so well on this kind of card, even if it is on medium its still impressive.
@Kuzo53 My ex-roommate has a 5770 with an i7 920. I was playing Crysis on his PC at 1920x1080 everything set to "High" settings, and textures set to Very High. I have not reached any of the alien or zero-g levels in the game yet, but I was watching the framerate and it always got 30-50 fps pretty consistently. The 5770 was also at stock settings with the stock cooler. And for a last-gen mid-range card, I think that's pretty good. He got the XFX 5770 though, after his Sapphire 4890 died.
@LinkinParkFan219 i got this it good for little olde games like quake wars which is great lags sum on battlefield 2 but playable if u not so picky only game i had problem with was front line fuel of war
Tbh this is a good card but if you want a substantial performance gain at a decent price then get the 5770 or even the lower 5670. Will play crisis warhead at gamer settings @ 1600 res or below @30+ fps no probs. I know this because i use to have one.
Hey guys my specs: Windows Xp Sp3 Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 2.51GHZ 2GB Ram DDR2-800 160 GB HD - ST3160215A Intergrated ATI Radeon 2100 - 256MB PSU 350 Watts Choosing to upgrade the intergrated graphics to a Ati Radeon HD 4650 or Nvidia 9400 GT. Which one is best for in my case for my current specs and will i be able to play new games like GTa4? what do you think? Thanks
radeon 4850 512, phenom ii x4 965, 4 gb ddr3 1600, wd black hdd, win 7. can i run it with all the bells and whistles? monitor supports up to 1680x1050.
AMD Phenom™ II X2 545 Processor - 3.0 GHz - 2.0 GHz HT (4000 MT/s) - 6 MB L3 Cache Operating SystemGenuine Windows® 7 Home Premium RAM- 4GB - DDR2 - maximum RAM 4GB Graphics cardATI Radeon HD 4650 - 1GB dedicated memory Screen typeNone Hard drive500GB SATA 7200rpm Optical disk driveDVD-Rewriter Is this PC good enough to run Left 4 dead, crysis ECT with no lag?
@MinimeDrummerBoi I hope you're kidding. Seriously a 500-600$ computer can't run a 3 year old game? I regret building a new computer, hardware is always a pain in the ass when it decides to break and it costs you an arm and a leg. Wow, I should have bought a ps3 or something. OR you're exaggerating because the recommended requirements are lower than that.
Doesn't matter how old the game is. Everyone knows that Crysis is really just that demanding. It was quite ahead of it's time when it was released and even modern video cards at the time struggled a bit.
Recommended requirements varies throughout everyone. Those recommended requirements could work great on 1680x 1050, but somewhat sluggish at full 1080P. It's up to people to research on their own before purchasing anything.
@MinimeDrummerBoi yes yes I know, it kinda failed when it was released because almost nobody could play it but still, I expected that 3 years later a custom built 500-600$ machine could run it.
@MinimeDrummerBoi it doesn't... or maybe my video card version is different from yours (1 gb ddr3) and since you are playing demo I played all the demo version too and the FPS are precisely 10-20 with all in max, even in the most intense cenes.
Mines DDR2; slower memory. 10 - 20FPS is way too unplayable for me.
Either way, it was a decent card at the time. This video was quite old and I've done plenty of upgrades as shown in my videos. I now own an ASUS 5850.
@MinimeDrummerBoi Well i can play Metro 2033 in max settings without directx 11 so it's not an old card since you can play all the newst games in max settings of course if you play in medium it doesnt give even a little bit of lag witch makes the video card still good for this time but that video card you have now seems to be real great even because there is a gddr5 version and that must be fast as hell
@MinimeDrummerBoi If you go to notebookcheck website and search for our videocard you can see that there says 25-37 in the benchmark results... test with the benchmark too and check if you need newer drivers or something
Personally, I think the biggest noticeable difference is between medium and low. Atleast the colors look good, the texture doesn't look like it's crudely slapped on, and there's some sense of effects. High and Very High mostly just add more shaders.
@SynodCenturion Then it's probably just me. Atleast medium has basic shaders, low has none, the water even looks like a mirror. I'm just saying that, through normal play, the difference between low and medium is more significant than from medium to high.
No it's ok. I didnt mean to be in a offense. I just meant, ehm... going up from 200.000 to >3.000.000 triangles/sec with deferred lighting and dynamic shadows :P. is a huge difference.
Can I max it out with 30+ FPS? I know an hd 5770 can max it out but my processor will probably bottleneck the card so i wanna figure out how much fps the bottlenecked card can get.
get a 4890 there cheap now 200$ or a 4850 120$ at NCIX oh and dont get the xfx one its a revamp one it sucks get the asus 4890 and 4850 asus xfx or sappier there all good :D im getting a 4890 soon the 8600 gt sucks
no actualy the colors look much better on a crt hahahaha go figure w/e i still like my new 22 inch acer but yeah it u buy a glossy lcd screen it will look as good as a crt.... the monitor does not affect graphics overall tho...
I have a kestion for yah ;) well is the Sony vaio any good? The FW SERIES i mean it has windows 7 with i belive 4 GB RAM .5 TB HDD Space well wadaya think? can i prob run thy game? crysis? it does have HD 4650 Ure ANSWER WILL BE MUCH APRECIATED
quad core alway better then duo. but it depend on what your use your pc for. If you play game online a lot, I suggest you use a quad core cpu is better.
j'ai la meme carte grpahique est mes performances sont largement mieu que ce truk --"
mathis13640 7 months ago
what video card do you have now?
MrVinsanity25 7 months ago
@MrVinsanity25 5850.
MinimeDrummerBoi 7 months ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi
niceeee,
i had hd 4650 but i have upgarded to gts 450 1gb ddr5, it's pretty nice card for 1440x900.
nice video man ;)
MrVinsanity25 5 months ago
Also, This looks like a console game, it almost makes me sick x_x
seether5000 7 months ago
dude 12 to 30 fps.i get like 40 to 50 fps on crysis on my xfx radeon hd 4650 on 1024x786 and all settings medium
masterofnocrack 8 months ago
@masterofnocrack Um precisely. 1024 x 728 is a low resolution...
Doesn't matter now though, very old video.
MinimeDrummerBoi 8 months ago
@TheColorSpace This is an old video...
MinimeDrummerBoi 9 months ago
You can def up the ante with the textures- or even run high settings.
shivanthing 10 months ago
This game muzzleflash is restricting 20fps of the game while u shot
Blody1337 1 year ago
Guys, you need some teaching. I purchased this card for my system with a X4 2.9GHz processor.
My brother purchased this card with his 2.1GHz X2 Processor.
I get about 50 more frames than him in any game well ever play.
Watch out for your processor.
Acceptable76 1 year ago
@Acceptable76 Crysis doesn't even have Quad Core Support broseph, your point is invalid here ;D
seether5000 7 months ago
@seether5000 Games in general my m8 :-)
Acceptable76 7 months ago
I also have a 4650, but I can run it lag-free at 1600x900 with all settings on high and 2x AA
TheBaronUnderbheit 1 year ago
ive got question i know there lot of better graphic cards but can u tell me, is that card good enough to play games like battlefield etc. for next few years i aint got enough money to buy some more expensive one ;/
LinkinParkFan219 1 year ago
@LinkinParkFan219 Aim for a 5770.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi Speaking of 5770, How's nvidia GTS 250?
DoozyJr 1 year ago
@DoozyJr That's nice decent card, but I believe the 5770 does out perform it. Look up some benchmarks, not too certain about that.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi I had a 5770. It worked great....for a little while. The dang thing died, all my games run horrible, and Crysis didnt run as well as I would of hoped. Maybe I just got a bad card. It was from Sapphire so watch out.
Kuzo53 1 year ago
@Kuzo53 I only had one issue with Sapphire out of my 2 Sapphire cards. However, they replaced my 4890 free of charge.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi Ya im getting all my money back and I think im going to buy from Nvidia. Btw impressive video i didnt know Crysis could run so well on this kind of card, even if it is on medium its still impressive.
Kuzo53 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MinimeDrummerBoi could i run crysis on high OR MEDIUM with 1280x800, AMD Phenom™ II X2 545
- 3.0 GHz
- 6 MB L3 Cache
- 2.0ghz HT (4000 MT/s) Genuine Windows® 7 Home Premium Genuine - 4 GB installed DDR2 RAM
- 4GB maximum RAM capacity
ATI Radeon HD 4650
- 1GB dedicated memory
smooth ? and if i can run high please say that lol
xxXViiRUSXxx1 1 year ago
@Kuzo53 My ex-roommate has a 5770 with an i7 920. I was playing Crysis on his PC at 1920x1080 everything set to "High" settings, and textures set to Very High. I have not reached any of the alien or zero-g levels in the game yet, but I was watching the framerate and it always got 30-50 fps pretty consistently. The 5770 was also at stock settings with the stock cooler. And for a last-gen mid-range card, I think that's pretty good. He got the XFX 5770 though, after his Sapphire 4890 died.
TriplePlay2425 1 year ago
@LinkinParkFan219 Perfectly.
Acceptable76 1 year ago
@LinkinParkFan219 i got this it good for little olde games like quake wars which is great lags sum on battlefield 2 but playable if u not so picky only game i had problem with was front line fuel of war
masmotors 1 year ago
@LinkinParkFan219 yes
Acceptable76 1 year ago
Tbh this is a good card but if you want a substantial performance gain at a decent price then get the 5770 or even the lower 5670. Will play crisis warhead at gamer settings @ 1600 res or below @30+ fps no probs. I know this because i use to have one.
Upgraded to a 5870 now though :D
FubuMushu 1 year ago
@FubuMushu Look at the date of the video...
The 5 series were no were near in production.
I currently have a 5850.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
help!!!!!plz is 26fps in any game smooth?!plz i have radeon hd 4650 and wonder if aion runs smooth
Gh3masterofrock 1 year ago
@Gh3masterofrock 26FPS is a bit low. Try aiming for 30FPS.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
Would this card play HD 1080p mkv movies without lag?
RKhatkar34 1 year ago
@RKhatkar34 Yes
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
would this be a good card for the new mmos comin out next year. im lookin into the dell xps17 any advice would be great
LawAZ9 1 year ago
@LawAZ9 It'll be a decent card. Look at a 5770.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
i want to buy:
quad core processor
4 GB of RAM
4650 1GB ...
on what settings will CRYSIS run at the frame rate at about 30+ ???
i'm searching this answer fon quite a few days now !!! tnx guys ;)
jani11 1 year ago
@jani11 My guess is medium - high at a decent resolution.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi thanks man ;)
jani11 1 year ago
i have this graficcard hd4650 and a 2,2 ghz prozessor, does it run in the highest resolution?=
Kaiiserc0320009 1 year ago
IS 3870 BETTER THAN 4650??? I need to buy 4650 in few days, and I have 3650. Can somebody tell me which one is better???
borkogamerr 1 year ago
@borkogamerr From my experience, the 3870 outperform the 4650
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
crysis is a bad game. and the graphics are showing it was released in 2007
madmax8779 1 year ago
ollie062 1 year ago
@ollie062 The 4650 performs better than the 9400GT
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
radeon 4850 512, phenom ii x4 965, 4 gb ddr3 1600, wd black hdd, win 7. can i run it with all the bells and whistles? monitor supports up to 1680x1050.
dschultz6072 1 year ago
@dschultz6072
Yes.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
Comment removed
dschultz6072 1 year ago
lag!!!!!!!!
FlipazoneFilms 1 year ago
@FlipazoneFilms
Obviously you lose frames when you run Fraps...
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@FlipazoneFilms this lags to you? fail
violinsurgent16 1 year ago
/watch?v=vjuDzsb3flc
MrFrelis 1 year ago
@MrFrelis
Really?
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
these are my settings:
-Intel Pentium 4 CPU 2,66 ghz
- 1 GB DDR2 RAM
-Windows XP ( I will get 7 soon )
If i would get a 4650, would I be able to play this game on low settings?
dylandionrakiman 1 year ago
@dylandionrakiman
I would say no. Not with that PT4.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi PT4?
dylandionrakiman 1 year ago
@dylandionrakiman
Pentium 4.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@dylandionrakiman not a chance.
junkietomato 1 year ago
i got radeon 4650 and crysis runs at 1024x720(i think) and medium and its only 25FPS! and i got 2gb ram, windows xp, dual core OC@ 3.4ghz
ThaDK00 1 year ago
random94man 1 year ago
@random94man
Left 4 Dead, yes.
Crysis, you can probably get away with low settings.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi I hope you're kidding. Seriously a 500-600$ computer can't run a 3 year old game? I regret building a new computer, hardware is always a pain in the ass when it decides to break and it costs you an arm and a leg. Wow, I should have bought a ps3 or something. OR you're exaggerating because the recommended requirements are lower than that.
junkietomato 1 year ago
@junkietomato
Doesn't matter how old the game is. Everyone knows that Crysis is really just that demanding. It was quite ahead of it's time when it was released and even modern video cards at the time struggled a bit.
Recommended requirements varies throughout everyone. Those recommended requirements could work great on 1680x 1050, but somewhat sluggish at full 1080P. It's up to people to research on their own before purchasing anything.
That's why they have benchmarks.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi yes yes I know, it kinda failed when it was released because almost nobody could play it but still, I expected that 3 years later a custom built 500-600$ machine could run it.
junkietomato 1 year ago
@random94man
i'd say medium - high with a native resolution of 1280 x 1024 :)
MASTERLEAF00 1 year ago
i play crysis on max using lower resolution but it gives 30 FPS
Guyc00l 1 year ago
@Guyc00l
The FPS will probably drop significantly during the more "intense" scenes.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi it doesn't... or maybe my video card version is different from yours (1 gb ddr3) and since you are playing demo I played all the demo version too and the FPS are precisely 10-20 with all in max, even in the most intense cenes.
I use windows 7 64 bits by the way...
Guyc00l 1 year ago
@Guyc00l
Mines DDR2; slower memory. 10 - 20FPS is way too unplayable for me.
Either way, it was a decent card at the time. This video was quite old and I've done plenty of upgrades as shown in my videos. I now own an ASUS 5850.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi Well i can play Metro 2033 in max settings without directx 11 so it's not an old card since you can play all the newst games in max settings of course if you play in medium it doesnt give even a little bit of lag witch makes the video card still good for this time but that video card you have now seems to be real great even because there is a gddr5 version and that must be fast as hell
Guyc00l 1 year ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi If you go to notebookcheck website and search for our videocard you can see that there says 25-37 in the benchmark results... test with the benchmark too and check if you need newer drivers or something
Guyc00l 1 year ago
@Guyc00l
I no longer own the card. This video is old so I went from here to a 3870 to 4890 to now a 5850, but thanks for the tip.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
You can get the texture quality, and all the secondary things to veryhigh and you'll have better grapics without loosing too much fps (around 2-5)
milenent 1 year ago
@milenent
I've tried that before and I actually lost a lot FPS. Anyways, this video is old. I now own a 5850.
MinimeDrummerBoi 1 year ago
0:47 omg i had no idea you could do that, i always shot at it alot
metroid124 1 year ago
Gt220 or the HD4650? for gaming?
StupidRockersDK 2 years ago
HD 4650
My brother got an Gt220 and quad core and 6 gb ram and i got
Hd4650 and dual core 2.6 and 2gb ram and i beat his computer
kimzi123 2 years ago
absolutely HD4650.
Don't even bother to try to play games with 220. Old games like FEAR run in detail settings low only.
Warhamer116 1 year ago
Gt220 or the HD4650? for gaming?
StupidRockersDK 2 years ago
Not sure, look up some benchmarks.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
@StupidRockersDK definetly the gt 220
randomness711 1 year ago
Is the HD 4650 better than the GT220?
JSgamerz 2 years ago
I don't know. Try looking up some benchmarks.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
@JSgamerz HD4650
Deospeon 1 year ago
wow dood
nice graps
but i got a pc like ur
and i got one with high specs
darkwiiplayer 2 years ago
how do you play the game with a 4650
crimson177 2 years ago
Um what?
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
Personally, I think the biggest noticeable difference is between medium and low. Atleast the colors look good, the texture doesn't look like it's crudely slapped on, and there's some sense of effects. High and Very High mostly just add more shaders.
MetroidJunkie2007 2 years ago
@MetroidJunkie2007,
xD, i think u should do some more research, <<<<< it adds some more shaders xDDD..
Noticeable difference xD.... if u only knew the mathematics behind it... between low,,, medium,,,,high and very high settings :P.
SynodCenturion 1 year ago
@SynodCenturion Then it's probably just me. Atleast medium has basic shaders, low has none, the water even looks like a mirror. I'm just saying that, through normal play, the difference between low and medium is more significant than from medium to high.
MetroidJunkie2007 1 year ago
@MetroidJunkie2007,
No it's ok. I didnt mean to be in a offense. I just meant, ehm... going up from 200.000 to >3.000.000 triangles/sec with deferred lighting and dynamic shadows :P. is a huge difference.
SynodCenturion 1 year ago
damn, really nice graphics.
BlueDragon1194 2 years ago
Thanks!
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
@BlueDragon1194 cant wait til i get my pc! ill be able to play thius on high! maybe very high! that gives damn much better graphics than medium :D
runarboy1 2 years ago
AMD Athlon II x2 215
3 GB DDR2 RAM 667MhZ
500GB HDD
HD 5770
Can I max it out with 30+ FPS? I know an hd 5770 can max it out but my processor will probably bottleneck the card so i wanna figure out how much fps the bottlenecked card can get.
Haloroach 2 years ago
You can always download the Crysis Benchmarking Tool.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
yeah but i dont have the hd 5770 yet (I got it in my other comp that has an amd phenom x4) so I just wanna know.
Haloroach 2 years ago
I can't be sure but I'm gonna say it's going to play decently but that X2 215 is a big bottleneck.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
@Haloroach
I think you have 2 upgrade ram and gpu for better gaming... at least || X4 940 and 4gb 800mhz ram.
If you would maxed out in this specs, you will have something around 20+ fps
KlawsyTheOne 2 years ago
Wow dude, do you collect videocards or something?
sc0pl355 2 years ago
Lol no?
I only owned 3 video cards throughout my upgrades: Diamond 4650, Sapphire 3870 & Sapphire 4890. My friend is using the 4650 and I've sold the 3870
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
Oh, ok. Just that every vid it seemed like you were showing the performance of different cards.
sc0pl355 2 years ago
noob. it took u like 2 min to kill a boat lol
crysismon45 2 years ago
Right...
I was trying so "hard".
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
@crysismon45
it took me two minutes to kill ur mom in bed last night. dont be a retard on youtube please.
Haloroach 2 years ago
Lol, Jesus, some of the comments on here...
DullerCorpse 2 years ago
@WeTalkAbout your specs are great but the graphics card could've been like a 5770 or something in the 5XXX series. The 5970 i heard is really good
jjklumiar 2 years ago
whats ur system specs
joardan222 2 years ago
People need to read the description.
Updated specs are always provided on my channel.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
is this the agp version?
thegoldenboy294 2 years ago
No PCI-Express 2.0.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
Yes.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
is a 4670 better than 4650?
minablock 2 years ago
Yes.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
just got this card! my old 1 kept making my screen mess up..but it was old and i think it was broken.hope this 1 works and fixes that problem
TheRobotProductions 2 years ago
32 bit o 64 bit???
BloodyRoar02 2 years ago
32 bit.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
get a 4890 there cheap now 200$ or a 4850 120$ at NCIX oh and dont get the xfx one its a revamp one it sucks get the asus 4890 and 4850 asus xfx or sappier there all good :D im getting a 4890 soon the 8600 gt sucks
blueclaydude500 2 years ago
Watch my earlier videos; I've upgraded to a 4890 a long time ago.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
nice how is it?
blueclaydude500 2 years ago
It's doing well. I'm planning to upgrade to a 5850.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
great man.
I am building a very very cheap system with the 4650
KKOPPI 2 years ago
Sounds good.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
yes I have no damn money
KKOPPI 2 years ago
AMD Athlon II X3 Triple Core 425 2.7 GHz
8 GB DDR3
1 TB (5400 RPM) SATA
ATI Radeon HD 4650
Can I run Crysis?
L0lk1ng 2 years ago
hell ya you can
kelso1325 2 years ago
@L0lk1ng No need for 8GB of DDR3, go down to 6. You should be able too.
piperdmac 2 years ago
Thank you for your time.
alanlol101 2 years ago
No problem.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
ATI HD4650 1GB
AMD Athlon X2 II 240(2,8GHz)
1000GB HDD
Windows 7 Home Premium
Is this PC good enough to play Crysis or Modern Warfare 2 (Online) on 1024x768 or 1280x1024 on maybe medium details?
alanlol101 2 years ago
Yes.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
Does the monitor have a big say in anything? I mean, if i have an old CRT-monitor will it make the graphics look worse?
alanlol101 2 years ago
no actualy the colors look much better on a crt hahahaha go figure w/e i still like my new 22 inch acer but yeah it u buy a glossy lcd screen it will look as good as a crt.... the monitor does not affect graphics overall tho...
neonzion7 2 years ago
It doesn't effect the graphics. The only thing it might effect is how you view your game.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
I have a kestion for yah ;) well is the Sony vaio any good? The FW SERIES i mean it has windows 7 with i belive 4 GB RAM .5 TB HDD Space well wadaya think? can i prob run thy game? crysis? it does have HD 4650 Ure ANSWER WILL BE MUCH APRECIATED
SansaFuzexp 2 years ago
Crysis at a decent setting.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
Well you should be able to uninstall it. I've done it plenty of times.
The game itself isn't that. It's a mediocre game that boasts in the visuals.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
I don't remember how many gigs but I'm pretty sure you can uninstall it. Never heard of "sercum".
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
i heard 3870 is on par with 4650...just lower power, since you were able to compare, please tell me
masterchief3k 2 years ago
From what I've personally experienced, the 3870 is faster.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
Wow i didnt know that you could just turn off the jamming device in the game...I just kept shooting it until it blew up
revenant3154 2 years ago 3
i didnt evan touch it yet i beat the game lol
KingSamLopez 2 years ago
which is best? 4650 or 3870?
nikosyv 2 years ago
The 3870 outperformed the 4650 on my tests.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
3.8 ghz c2d O.o
MASTERLEAF00 2 years ago
Yes, on a stock cooler. Surprised myself.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
Mo offense, but you kind of...suck.
cheesyflames 2 years ago
Crysis isn't a game I play much.
In addition to that, I was trying to draw attention in order to put a lot of things going on the screen.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
@MinimeDrummerBoi I know. The graphics are great, but the game itself I've heard about doesn't sound too good.
cheesyflames 2 years ago
I thought the game was fucking fun , one of my all time favorites and people probably say it sucks is because the gameplay was laggy to them
revenant3154 2 years ago
@revenant3154 Probably. Looks fun enough. I think I might try the game...
cheesyflames 2 years ago
Quad Cores are the future.
SteelCity1981 2 years ago 2
wot would u say is better a intel quad core at 2.86ghz or duo care at 3.33ghz?
willums94 2 years ago
A dual core would be more sufficient at gaming since most games will only take advantage of 2 cores.
However, games are starting to utilize 4 cores as technology advances so a quad core would be a better investment, especially for future games.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
quad core alway better then duo. but it depend on what your use your pc for. If you play game online a lot, I suggest you use a quad core cpu is better.
Nobodyknow 2 years ago
quad core! get only 4 core processors!
halfpol 2 years ago
your running this quite smooth, not bad. When I recorded my crysis videos it feels bit laggy in game but when you watch video its alot nicer
JaxxDaemon 2 years ago 2
monster cpu!
jaw2floor 2 years ago
well its more like so so between minimum to reccomended
nealcolman 2 years ago 2
i have the minimum for processor power so i can run this with medium to high settings on 1024 x 768
nealcolman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this game suks
562Adam562 2 years ago
this game looks gr8. i just bought dis card sumtime ago... i want to know on which setting can dis game run on the res of 1024 by 768?
desperategamer93 2 years ago
Mix of medium and highs.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
dats gud to know.... i can't expect anymore out of it den the price for which it is.... just a bang for the buck i say!
desperategamer93 2 years ago
this game looks like it would like pretty good even on low settings.
PhilPlaysTheBass 2 years ago
HD 4650+ E8400 OR
HD 4770 + E7400
sunligth2000 2 years ago
4770 + E7400.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
just a little update, i bought this card in AGP and im using it with my pentium 4.
games are working fine, im able to run deadspace on max settings as well as crysis on medium settings.
its all good!
SHF2010son 2 years ago
I am Getting the 4650 with the intel core 2 duo t6600 will I be able to run this at medium? Please help!!
schlockandload 2 years ago
At a decent resolution yes.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
i just ordered the Radeon 4650 HD 512mb AGP card,
and i have a pentium 4 2.8 ghz.
will i be able to run games like this????
i think i should be able to
SHF2010son 2 years ago
Not with that PT4. That'll be bottlenecking your 4650.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
what if i overclock my CPU?
SHF2010son 2 years ago
It'll still somewhat bottleneck. I guess it'll be sufficient.
MinimeDrummerBoi 2 years ago
alright, well hopefully it wont be too bad.
thx
SHF2010son 2 years ago
how good must the computer be to play this game ( sry for bad english "
FrezziBalk 2 years ago