Your 2 cents is an impressive treasure trove of good thoughts. You are a wonderful human being. I would feel blessed to have a person like you in my family.
Fairplay the world has hope with intelligent open minded young people like yourself. Its too easy to mock people who live taboo lifestyles. 'Good people' are worth the love 'n' respect period.
@shane219 It is interesting that u say u would love ur child unconditionally if is was disabled etc.., b/c the same people who scream "freedom of expression" are the same people who say abortion is fine if the child MIGHT have a defect.
@shane219 Ur use of "freedom of expression" is ignorantly used EVEN though i understand where you're coming from with that statement. Today ur taught(Tv, school..) do what makes u feel good. If we all implemented that, there would be chaos. I would not discipline my son for wearing his mothers heels or purse but i would not let him continue to do it. Parents are not here to please or let there child do wutever they want even tho society says this. Children rule the parents in todays society.
what would i do if my son was playing with dolls? A child at such a young age could just be a sentive child not nessarly gay and even if that was the case who cares i would love my child no matter who he or she decieds who to be with. As long as the child is happy and loved I would be alright. I would hold my head up and teach the child to do the same
Often you find out very early that kids are gay, or even trans, although they often suffer through false marriages etc
The issue with boys vs girls is stupid machoism. In our culture from the beginning of time.
Its up to all of us to stop homophobia and transphobia
And yes - it is quite common that people who call them selves christians azctually end up hating their own children, and trhowing them out on the street.
Good post
Its really all about religion - the curse of humankind.
I take back what my original thoughts about you were. Again, you seem to raise intellegent points in your video's. Allow me to tell you about a life story, that happened to me two days ago. I lost a bet. So, I had to go to school as a tranny. At first it was embarassing, but it became funny. My cousin texted my mom during one of our classes and she came to the school and made me change. I've been arguing with her about discrimination. But her religion keeps her close minded to our world.
i wanted to be a chef and still am i have always loved cooking and some of the comments below disgust me! i cant agree with u more when u say everyone is ya own person! it serioulsy annoys me the fact people disown gay,straight, bi, black, white, mixed race, religion it really pisses me off!!!!!
great clear thoughts.. I couldn't agree more.. and of course you were shocked.. what they said was horrible bro.. that's why.. You have a great connection with your heart and I hope that everyday it gets stronger.. peace
Dude. You're not a father so you obviously have no idea what you are talking about.
A father's son is his future, his line. Immortality, dummy. When his kid comes up to him and says "Dad, I'm gay" this is the translation:
"Hey Dad, look! I just cut my balls off! I'm never having children or a family. Hope you weren't expecting grandkids someday. Because I just cut my balls off!"
@JeremyAlanBrady you can still adopt. so that way your giving a child a better life and carrying on the family name. so in a way not accepting your child for being gay is actually pushing the grandkid idea even further away.
You should love your child no matter what, their your child. You love them all through their child hood, why should you stop if they come out?
I'm a girl trapped in a boy's body but when I was a kid I loved playing with transformers and dinosaurs. Ppl have their interests and we're all individuals so to each his own I say! Ppl would scold me for having barbie dolls and cutsey plush toys but no one considered to mention my jurassic park figurine collection or range of autobots. Closed minded people see things from ONE point of view and block out the rest. Fuck em.
Even if you took a girly toy away from the boy, or vice versa, it doesn't change the desire to play with that type of toy, it only sweeps it under a carpet. If the child is gay or bisexual, it will come out later, why not try to deal with it and understand it at a young age, instead of trying to make it go away. It doesn't go away. Ever.
People are actually not that good at predicting what they'd really do. E.g. if Johnny says he's gay, very few parents just toss Johnny out on the street. If they put him through aversion therapy they may screw him up enough to fail in relationships, but even Ex-gays admit they don't change feelings, just behavior. Most parents wind up letting love win over politics.So Johnny best wait
If Johnny says "I'm gay," lots of people brag they'd toss Johnny out the door, but if they really have kids
Homosexuality is Wrong. stating that something is wrong is not being hateful, its just making a statement of fact. Just because someone does not support the practice of homosexuality or states the fact that its a choice does not mean they have a hatred for homosexuals, just homosexuality. I know some very nice people who made the choice to be homosexuals. do I hate them? no. Do I think they made the right choice? no. will I tell them its ok if they ask me? No.
Your argument is fallacious. Homosexuality is no more a choice than, say, left-handedness. Do you disparage those who are left-handed? Do you tell them that they have made a horrible choice? Catholics once beat lefties senseless for "choosing" the left hand, but sience, truth, has since proven that handedness is not a choice - it is genetic. It is only wrong to demean someone based solely on an inate natural quality which causes absolutely no harm to others.
@Sovair hypothetically( I don't believe in the theory)the existence of a single gene for homosexuality is an evolutionary impossibility. Natural selection does not allow for the existence of useless genes. a gay gene would be completely useless it can't aid in reproduction or anything else,. If there had ever been a gay gene it would have been eliminated. Handedness is different. Being left-handed myself I can honestly say its come in handy. (no pun intended. )
Once again, your argument is fallacious. Such a complex system as sexual orientation, whether heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual, or any other variety may have just as many different genes and alleles for expression. Also, though the human genome has been mapped, scientists have yet to discover the exact purposes for most of the genes. The genes may also be affected by hormones and other biochemicals as well; not just genetic, but certainly natural.
@Sovairu Thats whats being said of it today. that there is not just one gene that causes or plays a role in homosexuality but several. Curious there hasn't been any further progress as to finding any of them though. Once again, lets bring up the alleged "gay animals" lets assume they actually exist. That proves nothing except that a certain behavior is observed in nature. The fact that something occurs in nature however, does not make it natural.
@Sovairu (continued) Heterosexual behavior in both animals and humans is an exception. The sexual organs of the male are clearly made for those of the female , and when utilized they often produce another of the species. Therefore their usefulness is clear. it preserves mankind. Homosexual behavior in humans and animals produces nothing, their sexual organs are not made for each other but the opposite. In the case of males sex is performed in a highly potentially harmful way Not natural.
I am sorry for you that you do not understand the definitions nor other associated meanings of evolution, natural selection, nor even natural. By definition, if anything, be it object, being, process, phenomena, or existence, occurs in the scope of nature, by means of nature, and without any outside interference, then it is, absolutely and fundamentally, natural. Natural selection does not exclusively nor restrictively deal with reproduction, only survival of the species.
@Sovairu Murder occurs everyday. does that mean it is natural and acceptable?
Lol I didn't claim it did. as far as survival of the species goes there isn't any way a gay gene could serve that purpose or aid in doing so. therefore it would be eliminated.
@Sovairu Lol just saying. Murder occurs every single day. does that make it natural and acceptable? As for natural selection I understood what you said perfectly. it dealt with the survival of the species and such is not limited only to reproduction. There are several other factors that play a role in the survival of mankind, but the question is, what role could a gay gene play in the aspects of natural selection that have nothing to do with reproduction? I can't think of one.
@hikari4light I've been trying to get you to show CREDIBLE Independently Verifiable Proof that being Gay is a choice. After six months, you have not quoted even ONE Expert who shared your mistaken opinion. You keep stating your mistaken belief that being Gay is not a product of Evolution. Darwin never said that being gay was a choice , nor did he say that it was impossible to have a Gay gene. You admitted you are NOT an expert in ANY discipline, so I don't take your word for anything.
@hikari4light You have totally ignored my comment, as all who are reading this can see. After 6 months you STILL have not presented any expert opinion that being Gay is a choice, whereas I have offered 6 American Medical & Psychological professional organizations who say that being Gay is NOT a choice. You have stated YOUR opinion more times than I care to remember. You are not an expert and your opinion holds no weight.
@pete072313 Yes you've posted the APA's findings all over my video. I've addressed them over ten times and given you the APA's admission that there is no gay gene. Then in turn brought up the fact that Darwin's theory of evolution does not support the existence of a gay gene. You have yet to counter.
@pete072313 (Continued.) Darwin said that reproduction was not only essential but that we needed to produce more than neccessary to replace the adults that died. He said that evcolution and natural selection would favor traits that would facillitate this. He also said(I left this on your channel several times) that species or traits (Whatever doesn't facillitate reproduction or the survival of the spiecies would be eliminated by the process of natural selection.
@pete072313 ( continued again) A gene for homosexuality would be eliminated. Homosexuals cannot naturally reproduce abnd the gene couldn't serve any purpose in any other part of human survival.
@pete072313 (Continued once more) Of cpurse there have been many evolutionary scientists that have improved upon Darwin's theory and come up with several theories for why a gay gene might exist. The most common is population control but that dies when one considers the fact that the world is overpopulated today. I don't believe Darwin's theory of evolution you do. There's my argument(with a few typos as always) again. Counter it.
@hikari4light To begin with, I do not have the ability to post anything on your video. If I did, I’d correct the spelling and grammar and remove the lies in it. If you’ll look back, and this time actually READ, you’ll see the APA said that, a Gay Gene has not been identified YET, they did not say that there is no Gay Gene. The APA also said that being Gay is NOT a choice. You seem to have overlooked that. If you accept one thing that the APA says, you should accept everything.
It is blatantly obvious that you misapplied Darwin’s theories. Almost all Homosexual babies are born to Straight parents. The Straight parents, possibly the mother, cause the male child to be Homosexual. You should watch the video on my channel. It’s a cartoon, so it should keep your interest. You have so much trouble understanding English that your interpretation of a bus schedule can’t be trusted. You still have not proved that being Gay is a choice. Darwin didn’t say it, nor did God.
Where did anyone credible say that a gene for Homosexuality would be eliminated from the Straight parents? You are attempting to pass yourself off as an expert when you have already stated (and proved) that you are NOT an expert. Quote a credible source who says that being Gay is a choice. Darwin didn’t say it and neither did God.
By the way, neither God nor Darwin declared that Homosexual men and women are sterile, so they still can (and do) reproduce. Since you vowed to never marry and never bear children, can you prove that you are a Heterosexual? Your statement about never having an interest in having sex of any kind makes you an Asexual, not a Heterosexual. If you’re not smart enough to define what YOU are, how can you define what another person is? You have still not proved that being Gay is a choice.
@pete072313 Again this isn't about what Darwin said concerning homosexuality. Its about the fact that his theory does not support the existence of a "Gay gene" . The quote I left on your channel explains that those who cannot naturally reproduce. (Two men having sex with each other produces nothing but a high risk of disease. Two women having sex with each other produces nothing either. ) would be eliminated by natural selection. that goes for traits too. like a gay gene.
@hikari4light YOU are the one who says that a Gay Gene is impossible, but you have never quoted a CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT who agrees with you, probably because Experts know that nothing is impossible. You still have not proved that being Gay is a choice. You have had 7 months to find an Expert who agrees with you and you can’t.
@pete072313 LOL not just me. Darwin. He said that traits and genes that did not facilitate Rerproduction would be eliminated by the process of natural selection.
a gay gene would not facilitate natural reproduction and would therefore be eliminated. Counter.
@pete072313 BTW Homosexuals Cannot naturally reproduce. Its completely impossible. Keyword NATURAL. when a man has sex with another man and produces a child as a result. Or two women have sex with each other and have a child as a result then and only then can homosexuals reproduce. anything else is not natura, and Darwin's theories(Which you believe, not me) are talking about natural reproduction. any gene or trait that doesn't allow for natural reproduction is eliminated.
@hikari4light Although a male cannot become pregnant and give birth and a woman cannot fertilize an egg, just being Homosexual does not automatically shut down their ability to reproduce.
BTW, You have STILL not proved that being Gay is a choice.
@pete072313 LOL evolution is taught in school. Highschool. You don't need to be any kind of expert to understand the very basics of it of you go to school ( where I live anyway.). ROFLThere wouldn't be a GAY gene in STRAIGHT parents. a gay gene makes you gay. so it wouldn't exist in anyone straight. furthermore it wouldn't exist at all with Darwin's theory applied. either that or it would have been eliminated billions of years ago.
@hikari4light If High Schools taught enough to make students experts, Universities would close. You are not an expert. If the scientific world thought the way you do, we would be sending these messages by smoke signals. Straight parents have Gay children. The APA says that being Gay is not a choice. Therefore, the Gay children were born Gay, meaning Straight parents are the cause of it. Homosexual people are not sterile. They can (and do) reproduce. You’ve not proved that being Gay is a choice.
@pete072313 ROFL I never said they taught enough to make scientists experts. I said you didn't need to be an expert to understand the very basics of Evolution if you went to high school. these are basics I'm talking. Easily countered if you have the slightest knowledge about the subject. Yep you're trying to argue that its a trait but it isn't the entire genome is already mapped. we'd know exactly what gene carried the trait. if it were one.
@pete072313 Lol of course not. Darwin didn't have to say so. this argument is about evolution and genetics. The father of which says that those who did not reproduce (Traits and species alike ) would be eliminated by the process of natural selection. ho Can you elaborate or are you going to go with one of Dawkin's suspicions on this one?
@hikari4light Actually, this argument is about choice. The American Psychological Association and 5 other Psychological and Medical organizations, as well as the National Association of Social Workers stated that being Homosexual, Heterosexual or Bisexual are not choices. Those seven organizations are my CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERTS. You stated you are not an expert and say being Gay is a choice but you never quoted a CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT who agrees with you.
@pete072313 Yes yes yiou've posted that argument all over my video and I've already adressed it over ten times. The current argument that you have yet to counter is about evolution which you believe. not what an organization says. so counter.
@pete072313 Homosexuals cannot naturally reproduce. therefore if a gay gene existed it would be eliminated by the process of natural selection. This isn't about what Darwin said concerning homosexuality. Its about the fact that his theory (Which you believe, not I) does not support the existence of a gay gene. thats fact. now there are alternatives, like Dawkins who came up with possible exceptions. Do you adhere to any of these?
@hikari4light Although I believe in evolution, I didn’t bring it into the discussion, you did. Not only do you not believe it, you misinterpret what you read. As I said, you are not qualified to interpret a bus schedule, let alone the Bible or Darwin. As proof of this, in the last SEVEN months, you have been unable to find a single CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT who agrees with you.
@hikari4light For the past 7 months I have waited for you to prove that being Gay is a choice. In your 6 comments here you used 242 words and still have not offered CREDIBLE independently verifiable PROOF for your statements or quoted a CREDIBLE EXPERT who AGREES with you. YOU are admittedly NOT an expert in any field of Science or Religion, so your opinion, while cute, is not fact. I quoted my CREDIBLE EXPERTS and you quoted yourself misinterpreting Darwin and the Bible. Please do better.
@hikari4light I contend that you have not listed any CREDIBLE independently verifiable PROOF or quoted any CREDIBLE EXPERTS because you cannot find any who agree with you. In sheer desperation you are unsuccessfully attempting to get me to ignore your failure. In fact, two days ago you had a hissy-fit and blocked me from your channel like a child running home with her toys because she didn’t like the rules. I am not following your childish rules because you are not qualified to lead.
@pete072313 Lol I've been presenting you with evidence, the current concerning Darwin. and how the existence of a gay gene is not supported by his theory. counter.
@hikari4light For the past 5 MONTHS you have not been able to properly state that my comments are ABOUT your video, they are neither IN nor ON nor ALL OVER your video. This just underscores your inability to understand proper American English.
@pete072313 Exactly. thats why we say "on" as in " what is your opinion ON Obama's healthcare bill?" does it mean an opinion is literally on top of the bill ? no. they're using the word on synonymously with about. just like the emails"Someone has replied to your comment on..." not IN as you're mistaking it for.
@hikari4light Congratulation! You only needed 154 words to say nothing this time. You indeed “quoted” Darwin, then used flawed assumptions. You are attempting to use this as the basis for your erroneous hypothesis. All I’m asking is that you quote a CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT who agrees with you. For 7 months you have been unable to do that.
I don’t have an opinion ON Obama’s health care bill, but I do have one ABOUT it. Quoting others with poor grammar doesn’t make yours correct.
@pete072313 ROFL I already have. the real problem is that you have absolutely no idea what anything I've said means. Much less how to counter it. Whats completely hilarious is that you claim to believe Darwin's theory despite the fact you don't seem to know anything about it . I've left quotes from Darwin himself, Someone came and HANDED you Dawkins whom you could EASILY use to counter. You just don't get it.
@shane219 Thanks. Yesterday she told me that she has "superiors" who tell her what she can and can't do. Does that sound like a cult to you, too? I've suggested to her that she sounds like a member of the Westboro Baptist Church. :o)
@shane219 He's on a good 20 different "anti/pro-gay" vids and at this point he seems to be fighting for and against gays....I cant tell anymore....he seems to have the hots for darwin though >:D
@pete072313 You're trying to argue that homosexuality is a genetic TRAIT not a GENE. Because assuming that there was a gay gene(Which is impossible by Darwin's theory) It would make the parents of that child Gay. if its a TRAIT carried on their genes. It would already be isolated. scientists would easily know which gene the homosexuality trait was carried on and could even calculate problability. but is homosexuality is not a genetic trait. . this whole issue would be a memory.
@hikari4light No, I’m asking YOU to PROVE what you say by quoting a CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT. I don’t see why it’s so hard for you to understand what I’m asking for. I was kidding about you not being able to interpret a bus schedule, but now you have me wondering.
@pete072313 Lol thats what we're posting on right now Pete. a video. We're leaving comments on (not in otherwise you could change it.) a video. A gayu gene is an impossibility by Darwin's theory of evolution. For this reason scientists believe in several genetic factors being the cause of homosexuality. .
@hikari4light If we are posting on a video, why is the video not changing? Your lack of understanding of English is disturbing. I have never posted anything on another person’s video. To begin with, I don’t have their passwords. YOU are the one who says that a Gay Gene is impossible, but you have never quoted a CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT who agrees with you, probably because Experts know that nothing is impossible. You still have not proved that being Gay is a choice.
@pete072313 ROFL ROFL ROFL we are not posting IN a video. that would mean we could change its contents. we are posting ON a video. We are leaveing comments in reference to it. Thats why the emails say "Someone has replied to your comment on..." not IN.' big difference.
Also, to clarify on your use of "theory": a scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules, scientific laws, which express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena.
@Sovairu Exactly. But even scientist know that the fact that a phenomena is observed in nature doesn't automatically make it natural or genetic. The assertion that there are "gay animals " for instance and that homosexual tendencies have been observed in them. have fed the theory that "being gay is not a choice" the observation fits the theory. genetics. but observations must be coupled with scientific law like Natural Selection , which doesn't allow for the existence of useless genes.
You also assume a false premise by claiming that a gene for homosexuality is not good for reproduction and would be eliminated through evolution. You falsely assume that homosexuals cannot reproduce. In reality, there is nothing physiologically preventing reproduction. A sperm from a man of ANY orientation will fertilize an egg from a woman of ANY orientation. The genes will still pass on. Physiologically, infertility or sterility actually prevent reproduction.
@SovairuTwo men having sex with one another produces nothing.
Two women having sex with one another produces nothing. Its biologically impossible.Lol true they can get artificially inseminated (in the case of lesbians) but thats an unknown man and a woman having a baby. True their genes will be passed, but a gay gene wouldn't be one of them , because useless genes are eliminated.
Here is an example of my previous statement: Megachurch Pastor Comes Out Of Closet on MegaQfactor's channel. The pastor has clearly fathered children and passed on his genes, yet he is also clearly gay, and has been since he can remember. Naturally and evolutionarily, homosexuality is also highly prevalent in other animals, mammals or otherwise: Homosexuality in Animals on groyn88's. Sexuality, homosexuality and otherwise, serves a variety of social and individual functions.
@Sovairu Lol the existence of a Gay gene is impossible with Natural Selection in the mix. If you mean to argue that its a trait carred by a gene tt would already be isolated. Lol I've yet to see a "gay animal" I've seen videos here that claim to depict them but all they do is mount one another which is done for countless reasons in the wild.hypothetically lets pretend they do exist. You can't use the fact tnat a group of organisms engage in a behavior to deem it natural or genetic.
Evolutionarily speaking, left-handedness is no more useful nor more effective than right-handedness. Using only one hand predominately would seem counterintuitive to being ambidextrous. Besides, evolution is only the change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms through successive generations. Some diseases, like cystic fibrosis or sickle-cell disease, and other traits, like polydactyly are genetic in nature, yet they have not in any way been culled by Evolution.
@Sovairu lol you speak in terms of genetic traits. which are passed on by genes and can be isolated , the probability of their continuance easily determined.I speak of Genes themselves not the traits they carry. As far as genes are concerned. a gay one cannot exist. It would be useless and eliminated by the process of natural selection if it ever did. (hypothetically of course. again I don't believe the theory.)
@Sovairu LOl as for the scorn given us lefties, I faced some of that too (certainly not beating). but They never succeeded in making me use my other hand.
Until homophobic people are capable of having the intelligence of understanding that being gay or straight is not a choice, this kind of situation will continue to happen. Only bisexuals have a choice. If you know someone who has chosen then their bisexual. Straight people can't choose to be gay (ever!) and vice-versa.
I hate it when people do that. I really agree with you. I think there should be more love and there should be acceptant of different ideas and ways of life.
If my child, if I had a child, said that they were gay, I'd be accepting because that's MY child. That's my creation of life. I completely agree with you.
omg yeahh i know mee to well im bi so i take it more into offense when people say stuff like that but yess im all with you btw i love your eyes they are wickedd bluee (:
Gayness happens when you a guy sticks his finger or/and penis in your anus and activates the "gay tigger" on th inside. Then you must be gay from then on.
Here's a good question : Why do gays actually like having a anothers mans dick in their ass?! I imagine that to be extremely painful. So do gays like this pain?! And how can you get horny when your sucking another guys dick?! And if you dress / talk / behave feminine, why don't you just get a sex change?! As a woman you would get more dick than you ever wished for. xD Nah, i'm just kidding! The more gays exist, the more straight woman are left for straight guys! (Like me) :D
@WhyWomenAreStupid To be honest, you sound kinda gay. You should only let those graphic thoughts swim around in your head..youtube is not really the place. Even your user name is a bit questionable. If you're so curious about anal sex with a man, you should go explore your city..maybe you can find some more guys like you, who also think "women are stupid"
@Fantommenace23 Sorry to dissapoint you, but i am 100% straight. Manass just does'nt turn me on. And my user-name refers to the girls/women that you can see in my uploaded videos, not every women on this planet. I'm not a sexist but sometimes women act incredible stupid, that's what my user-names means. And i'm not a gay-hater either, i just can't understand why guys prefer men over women. And last but not least, my previous comment was not meant to be absolutely serious.
Don't forget that there are a lot of good people in this country as well. I think that we even out number the bad. Most parents, I believe are like yourself, they practice unconditional love. Peace
Amen your exactally right u should love your children no matter what....and god created us all different if he wanted us all the same no one would be different....there would be no gays lesbians kids with missing limbs or mental retardations and we would all look and act the same....so just remember that you should love your child because you loved them before they told you they were gay why should your love change????.....can anyone tell me????
mm about the age expectency thing... I dont think its true I mean, as long as your carefull to have safe sex you know? Anyways... about womens its a fact that having children will make a women age faster, the more you have the quicker you age. :P so technically, since gay women dont adopt (or other) that often... :P hehe
My brothers and sisters we are living in a world today where things are like upside down. God vreated us with his image and it is human who created that way, and God created women for men because our God knew that man couldn't stay by himself. And after create of man, they were doing a lot of sins before God.................Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed by God because God was very angry of what they were doing.
*cough cough cough* excuse me but yeah you do see this in nature, scientists calls this "Homosexual behaviour in animals" it was observed thousands of times. Just google it im sure you can easily find an article about this.
Since Homosexuals have no biological tie's to their children I guess they can have sex legally with them when they become of age! I also hope you don't mind my views on Homosexuality, because I was born with an anti-gay gene and therefore I just can't help being the way I am towards you people! But I know since you are loving of all you can feel my pain in being born like this!
so if your child wants to get a tattoo or get a lip ring thats ok too? its up to the parent to restrict their child's toy. if a child wants to play with a easy bake overn then ok thats fine get that child a oven that is steered toward their sex but if your child is cross dressing that can be more of a problem.
Boys who are playing with girl toys don't have to become homosexual. What about the GI-Joe dolls? These are boy toys aren't they? I'm gay but never ever played with dolls or play with make-up. And I have a few gay friends who are talented football players. So that did't changed them to straight men either.
It's such a sad terrible fear that if your child isn't masculine he will be gay. I played with some baby dolls when I was a little kid, and played with guns, played football, baseball, basketball; I'm straight. If anything it made me more nurturing and loving to my kids and my siblings children. Dragpalacetv, I totally agree with you, it is sad what society drives in people's heads. But I do think it is getting better little by little.
I believe gay people are gay from birth and so forcing them to behave macho would only likely transform them into a closet homosexual which is quite tragic. On the other hand it may prevent bullying at school so it is a hard one. Not sure how I would deal with that situation
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Of course you would treat your kid indifferent! Because unless your boyfriends ass grows a womb you won't be having a kid anytime soon! thankfully all of nature isn't gay or we wouldn't have anyone living on this planet! Except for maybe Michael Jackson!
Wow, how tragic if not every couple on this planet reproduces. There are straight couples that choose not to have kids either. Marriage and relationships aren't always about having a kid. There are many happy couples that are fine without children. I personally never want children, but I'm engaged and very happy with my boyfriend and I highly doubt our decision not to have kids will cause a wrinkle in the future of the world.. the same can be said for gay couples that can't reproduce.
Or homosexuals could reduce the population in the orphanages. Because just because you are "able" to have a child doesn't mean you should. Homosexuals have many options to allow them to have children: surrogate mothers, adoption, and in vetro fertilization. So, that argument is terrible.
I think that we will never be in a world without descrimination BECAUSE of the fact that we are all different. Sometimes i also wish we could live in a world without descrimination but than we would all be the same. You choose which one is better.
I don't believe that. I don't think we all need to be the same to realize that we are all human beings with feelings. We can respect each other and our diffirences with out being all the same. We just need to see that deep down we are all the same in the sense we are all human beings and we should respect each other. We don't all have to be brain washed computer controled clones for us to get there do we?
I completely agree with you. In the movie "Kindergarten Cop", Arnold Schwarzenegger's character explained to one mother that the reason her son played with barbie dolls was because he liked looking underneath their skirts. The only reason I liked playing with dolls when I was a kid was to use them to create my own stories. As for your wish to live in a hate free world, unfortunately that is a wish that will never come true. Human beings have it in their nature to hate people who are different.
This boy sounds like me. I used to play with dolls and I carry a hermes bag. Someone joked about putting thier kids on adoption if they turn out gay and I responded, "Good, Ill adopt them and teach them to be better then you."
why is the bible being thrown in the comments? Anytime the word gay is brought into a discussion God is thrown at the situation. People worship in their own way and have different beliefs so leave God out of it. I completely agree with you and the ignorance of the homophobic mother fuckers out there is rediculous. I stick up for gay/lesbian/bi transgender the same way i stick up for different races. Everyone is a person whether light dark gay or straight so treat everyone the same ass holes
There is no socity that has no discrimantion welcome to the world of bull shit and hatered and all the people that get treated badly by ass holes just become ass holes too so its never ending cycle and its really sad but what ever i just have my own belifs and people can have theirs too it doesnt bug me one bit ok well have a good night everyone
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
..If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon them" (Lev. 18:22, 20:13). look at this "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God" (1 Cor. 6:910, NIV).
honestly, i have zero respect for anyone that uses the Bible as a means of defending this issue. for a religion that is so strongly based off of love and helping others, so much time is spent condemning people to Hell. Take your hate filled views and find some other place to spew your garbage. for someone that is using religion as a source, you must then also know that there is only one man worthy of judging others...GOD HIMSELF. so take your self-righteous bullshit elsewhere. thanks! =]
@shane219 Well if you have read the bible you would know that god created adam and eve not adam and adam so gays are not normal even science has proven this males were ment to breed with females noy males and males that wrong and science also says that Homosexuality is a brain dysfunction cause when it comes to nature males were ment to breed with females not the other way around and im not judging you only god dose that im just point out
@chrisredfield3636 no god did not create adam nd adam but god still loves u 4 who u are no matter what. so do ur self a favor ndread the bible go 2 church nd ask ur pastor if gays are normal u dumb fuck
@shane219 dude dont worry like watch fabled verse if ur search the bible and study throughly theirs nothing wrong with two people truely love each other
Ok, you want to talk bible, how about this one. St. Matthew 19:12, " For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it." Eunich is someone who either has genital mutations, or cuts oneself off from a woman. Jesus said they are born that way.
The definition of eunich from that time that the bible was written was that. Who cuts themselves off from women at birth? Homosexuals, your argument only prooves that the bible is full of contradictions.
@LawyerMusic "The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals; it just that they need more supervision." -Lynn Lavner
fuck god, another free thinker. if u don't believe in creationism, which is ludicrous to believe in anyway, u can believe in god, but various parts of the bible just seem to build on assumptions, which r so clearly repudiated by the rational mind.
You're one smart guy,shane219!
Guillermo12339 2 weeks ago in playlist Liked videos
Your 2 cents is an impressive treasure trove of good thoughts. You are a wonderful human being. I would feel blessed to have a person like you in my family.
roman3773 3 weeks ago
Fairplay the world has hope with intelligent open minded young people like yourself. Its too easy to mock people who live taboo lifestyles. 'Good people' are worth the love 'n' respect period.
JohnJamesMaloney 6 months ago
@shane219 It is interesting that u say u would love ur child unconditionally if is was disabled etc.., b/c the same people who scream "freedom of expression" are the same people who say abortion is fine if the child MIGHT have a defect.
mytuber81 9 months ago
@shane219 Ur use of "freedom of expression" is ignorantly used EVEN though i understand where you're coming from with that statement. Today ur taught(Tv, school..) do what makes u feel good. If we all implemented that, there would be chaos. I would not discipline my son for wearing his mothers heels or purse but i would not let him continue to do it. Parents are not here to please or let there child do wutever they want even tho society says this. Children rule the parents in todays society.
mytuber81 9 months ago
what would i do if my son was playing with dolls? A child at such a young age could just be a sentive child not nessarly gay and even if that was the case who cares i would love my child no matter who he or she decieds who to be with. As long as the child is happy and loved I would be alright. I would hold my head up and teach the child to do the same
darrellmashburn 10 months ago
bueno felisidades, como adolesente deveras que eso es lo que y como el mundo deveria pensar, te felizito y te deseo lo mejor en tu vidad
8004william 11 months ago
you really have things figured out for a youngster.
go read the book - christian fascists - by chris Hedges. About $7 via Bookfinder4u..com
butteye02 1 year ago
For a youngster you really have things figured out very well congratulations
butteye02 1 year ago
Often you find out very early that kids are gay, or even trans, although they often suffer through false marriages etc
The issue with boys vs girls is stupid machoism. In our culture from the beginning of time.
Its up to all of us to stop homophobia and transphobia
And yes - it is quite common that people who call them selves christians azctually end up hating their own children, and trhowing them out on the street.
Good post
Its really all about religion - the curse of humankind.
butteye02 1 year ago
I take back what my original thoughts about you were. Again, you seem to raise intellegent points in your video's. Allow me to tell you about a life story, that happened to me two days ago. I lost a bet. So, I had to go to school as a tranny. At first it was embarassing, but it became funny. My cousin texted my mom during one of our classes and she came to the school and made me change. I've been arguing with her about discrimination. But her religion keeps her close minded to our world.
Anonomous0C 1 year ago
like times three billion and thirty six! wise words, man(:
alybear343 1 year ago
i wanted to be a chef and still am i have always loved cooking and some of the comments below disgust me! i cant agree with u more when u say everyone is ya own person! it serioulsy annoys me the fact people disown gay,straight, bi, black, white, mixed race, religion it really pisses me off!!!!!
letempz 1 year ago
GAY
magicamos 1 year ago
I totally thought the topic was Sexual Toys make you gay... XD
13Tsukihana13 1 year ago
@13Tsukihana13
You made a very good argument though; I'm just saying the title made me go "lolwut?" and click. :p
13Tsukihana13 1 year ago
great clear thoughts.. I couldn't agree more.. and of course you were shocked.. what they said was horrible bro.. that's why.. You have a great connection with your heart and I hope that everyday it gets stronger.. peace
buggsmalone 1 year ago
Im straight and I agree with you,man!
jordan200585 1 year ago
Dude. You're not a father so you obviously have no idea what you are talking about.
A father's son is his future, his line. Immortality, dummy. When his kid comes up to him and says "Dad, I'm gay" this is the translation:
"Hey Dad, look! I just cut my balls off! I'm never having children or a family. Hope you weren't expecting grandkids someday. Because I just cut my balls off!"
Just sayin'.
JeremyAlanBrady 1 year ago
@JeremyAlanBrady you can still adopt. so that way your giving a child a better life and carrying on the family name. so in a way not accepting your child for being gay is actually pushing the grandkid idea even further away.
You should love your child no matter what, their your child. You love them all through their child hood, why should you stop if they come out?
Just sayin'.
MsGemmaFormosa 1 year ago
I'm a girl trapped in a boy's body but when I was a kid I loved playing with transformers and dinosaurs. Ppl have their interests and we're all individuals so to each his own I say! Ppl would scold me for having barbie dolls and cutsey plush toys but no one considered to mention my jurassic park figurine collection or range of autobots. Closed minded people see things from ONE point of view and block out the rest. Fuck em.
CampbellxxPisces 1 year ago
you dnt belive i tht CAUSE YOUR GAY AS FXCK!
lakersgotthis 1 year ago
You have a very tidy room, your a good boy.
Is this not the same argument?
Those with eyes see, those with ears hear.
Not all is what it seems.
stoodOnAnArk 1 year ago
Even if you took a girly toy away from the boy, or vice versa, it doesn't change the desire to play with that type of toy, it only sweeps it under a carpet. If the child is gay or bisexual, it will come out later, why not try to deal with it and understand it at a young age, instead of trying to make it go away. It doesn't go away. Ever.
GayByProxy 1 year ago
your phone was going off lol
hemakesmehappy45 1 year ago
its not playing with dolls that makes kids gay, its kids being gay that makes them play with dolls
shimmerspear 1 year ago
Is there a hamster on ur radio ?!?!?
loukiedevil 1 year ago
People are actually not that good at predicting what they'd really do. E.g. if Johnny says he's gay, very few parents just toss Johnny out on the street. If they put him through aversion therapy they may screw him up enough to fail in relationships, but even Ex-gays admit they don't change feelings, just behavior. Most parents wind up letting love win over politics.So Johnny best wait
If Johnny says "I'm gay," lots of people brag they'd toss Johnny out the door, but if they really have kids
n2p94114 1 year ago
Homosexuality is Wrong. stating that something is wrong is not being hateful, its just making a statement of fact. Just because someone does not support the practice of homosexuality or states the fact that its a choice does not mean they have a hatred for homosexuals, just homosexuality. I know some very nice people who made the choice to be homosexuals. do I hate them? no. Do I think they made the right choice? no. will I tell them its ok if they ask me? No.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light
Your argument is fallacious. Homosexuality is no more a choice than, say, left-handedness. Do you disparage those who are left-handed? Do you tell them that they have made a horrible choice? Catholics once beat lefties senseless for "choosing" the left hand, but sience, truth, has since proven that handedness is not a choice - it is genetic. It is only wrong to demean someone based solely on an inate natural quality which causes absolutely no harm to others.
Sovairu 1 year ago
@Sovair hypothetically( I don't believe in the theory)the existence of a single gene for homosexuality is an evolutionary impossibility. Natural selection does not allow for the existence of useless genes. a gay gene would be completely useless it can't aid in reproduction or anything else,. If there had ever been a gay gene it would have been eliminated. Handedness is different. Being left-handed myself I can honestly say its come in handy. (no pun intended. )
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light
Once again, your argument is fallacious. Such a complex system as sexual orientation, whether heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual, or any other variety may have just as many different genes and alleles for expression. Also, though the human genome has been mapped, scientists have yet to discover the exact purposes for most of the genes. The genes may also be affected by hormones and other biochemicals as well; not just genetic, but certainly natural.
Sovairu 1 year ago
@Sovairu Thats whats being said of it today. that there is not just one gene that causes or plays a role in homosexuality but several. Curious there hasn't been any further progress as to finding any of them though. Once again, lets bring up the alleged "gay animals" lets assume they actually exist. That proves nothing except that a certain behavior is observed in nature. The fact that something occurs in nature however, does not make it natural.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@Sovairu (continued) Heterosexual behavior in both animals and humans is an exception. The sexual organs of the male are clearly made for those of the female , and when utilized they often produce another of the species. Therefore their usefulness is clear. it preserves mankind. Homosexual behavior in humans and animals produces nothing, their sexual organs are not made for each other but the opposite. In the case of males sex is performed in a highly potentially harmful way Not natural.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light
I am sorry for you that you do not understand the definitions nor other associated meanings of evolution, natural selection, nor even natural. By definition, if anything, be it object, being, process, phenomena, or existence, occurs in the scope of nature, by means of nature, and without any outside interference, then it is, absolutely and fundamentally, natural. Natural selection does not exclusively nor restrictively deal with reproduction, only survival of the species.
Sovairu 1 year ago
@Sovairu Murder occurs everyday. does that mean it is natural and acceptable?
Lol I didn't claim it did. as far as survival of the species goes there isn't any way a gay gene could serve that purpose or aid in doing so. therefore it would be eliminated.
hikari4light 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hikari4light
You still don't seem to understand anything about what I've been saying.
Sovairu 1 year ago
@hikari4light
You still either cannot understand, or you willfully choose not to understand what I have been saying. I am sorry for you.
Sovairu 1 year ago
@Sovairu Lol just saying. Murder occurs every single day. does that make it natural and acceptable? As for natural selection I understood what you said perfectly. it dealt with the survival of the species and such is not limited only to reproduction. There are several other factors that play a role in the survival of mankind, but the question is, what role could a gay gene play in the aspects of natural selection that have nothing to do with reproduction? I can't think of one.
can you?
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light I've been trying to get you to show CREDIBLE Independently Verifiable Proof that being Gay is a choice. After six months, you have not quoted even ONE Expert who shared your mistaken opinion. You keep stating your mistaken belief that being Gay is not a product of Evolution. Darwin never said that being gay was a choice , nor did he say that it was impossible to have a Gay gene. You admitted you are NOT an expert in ANY discipline, so I don't take your word for anything.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 LOL read Soviaru's comments. you might learn a little sonmething about how to counter the evolutionary argument I presented you.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light You have totally ignored my comment, as all who are reading this can see. After 6 months you STILL have not presented any expert opinion that being Gay is a choice, whereas I have offered 6 American Medical & Psychological professional organizations who say that being Gay is NOT a choice. You have stated YOUR opinion more times than I care to remember. You are not an expert and your opinion holds no weight.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 Yes you've posted the APA's findings all over my video. I've addressed them over ten times and given you the APA's admission that there is no gay gene. Then in turn brought up the fact that Darwin's theory of evolution does not support the existence of a gay gene. You have yet to counter.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@pete072313 (Continued.) Darwin said that reproduction was not only essential but that we needed to produce more than neccessary to replace the adults that died. He said that evcolution and natural selection would favor traits that would facillitate this. He also said(I left this on your channel several times) that species or traits (Whatever doesn't facillitate reproduction or the survival of the spiecies would be eliminated by the process of natural selection.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@pete072313 ( continued again) A gene for homosexuality would be eliminated. Homosexuals cannot naturally reproduce abnd the gene couldn't serve any purpose in any other part of human survival.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@pete072313 (Continued once more) Of cpurse there have been many evolutionary scientists that have improved upon Darwin's theory and come up with several theories for why a gay gene might exist. The most common is population control but that dies when one considers the fact that the world is overpopulated today. I don't believe Darwin's theory of evolution you do. There's my argument(with a few typos as always) again. Counter it.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light To begin with, I do not have the ability to post anything on your video. If I did, I’d correct the spelling and grammar and remove the lies in it. If you’ll look back, and this time actually READ, you’ll see the APA said that, a Gay Gene has not been identified YET, they did not say that there is no Gay Gene. The APA also said that being Gay is NOT a choice. You seem to have overlooked that. If you accept one thing that the APA says, you should accept everything.
pete072313 1 year ago
It is blatantly obvious that you misapplied Darwin’s theories. Almost all Homosexual babies are born to Straight parents. The Straight parents, possibly the mother, cause the male child to be Homosexual. You should watch the video on my channel. It’s a cartoon, so it should keep your interest. You have so much trouble understanding English that your interpretation of a bus schedule can’t be trusted. You still have not proved that being Gay is a choice. Darwin didn’t say it, nor did God.
pete072313 1 year ago
Where did anyone credible say that a gene for Homosexuality would be eliminated from the Straight parents? You are attempting to pass yourself off as an expert when you have already stated (and proved) that you are NOT an expert. Quote a credible source who says that being Gay is a choice. Darwin didn’t say it and neither did God.
pete072313 1 year ago
By the way, neither God nor Darwin declared that Homosexual men and women are sterile, so they still can (and do) reproduce. Since you vowed to never marry and never bear children, can you prove that you are a Heterosexual? Your statement about never having an interest in having sex of any kind makes you an Asexual, not a Heterosexual. If you’re not smart enough to define what YOU are, how can you define what another person is? You have still not proved that being Gay is a choice.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 Again this isn't about what Darwin said concerning homosexuality. Its about the fact that his theory does not support the existence of a "Gay gene" . The quote I left on your channel explains that those who cannot naturally reproduce. (Two men having sex with each other produces nothing but a high risk of disease. Two women having sex with each other produces nothing either. ) would be eliminated by natural selection. that goes for traits too. like a gay gene.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light YOU are the one who says that a Gay Gene is impossible, but you have never quoted a CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT who agrees with you, probably because Experts know that nothing is impossible. You still have not proved that being Gay is a choice. You have had 7 months to find an Expert who agrees with you and you can’t.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 LOL not just me. Darwin. He said that traits and genes that did not facilitate Rerproduction would be eliminated by the process of natural selection.
a gay gene would not facilitate natural reproduction and would therefore be eliminated. Counter.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@pete072313 BTW Homosexuals Cannot naturally reproduce. Its completely impossible. Keyword NATURAL. when a man has sex with another man and produces a child as a result. Or two women have sex with each other and have a child as a result then and only then can homosexuals reproduce. anything else is not natura, and Darwin's theories(Which you believe, not me) are talking about natural reproduction. any gene or trait that doesn't allow for natural reproduction is eliminated.
hikari4light 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hikari4light Although a male cannot become pregnant and give birth and a woman cannot fertilize an egg, just being Homosexual does not automatically shut down their ability to reproduce.
BTW, You have STILL not proved that being Gay is a choice.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 LOL evolution is taught in school. Highschool. You don't need to be any kind of expert to understand the very basics of it of you go to school ( where I live anyway.). ROFLThere wouldn't be a GAY gene in STRAIGHT parents. a gay gene makes you gay. so it wouldn't exist in anyone straight. furthermore it wouldn't exist at all with Darwin's theory applied. either that or it would have been eliminated billions of years ago.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light If High Schools taught enough to make students experts, Universities would close. You are not an expert. If the scientific world thought the way you do, we would be sending these messages by smoke signals. Straight parents have Gay children. The APA says that being Gay is not a choice. Therefore, the Gay children were born Gay, meaning Straight parents are the cause of it. Homosexual people are not sterile. They can (and do) reproduce. You’ve not proved that being Gay is a choice.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 ROFL I never said they taught enough to make scientists experts. I said you didn't need to be an expert to understand the very basics of Evolution if you went to high school. these are basics I'm talking. Easily countered if you have the slightest knowledge about the subject. Yep you're trying to argue that its a trait but it isn't the entire genome is already mapped. we'd know exactly what gene carried the trait. if it were one.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@pete072313 Lol of course not. Darwin didn't have to say so. this argument is about evolution and genetics. The father of which says that those who did not reproduce (Traits and species alike ) would be eliminated by the process of natural selection. ho Can you elaborate or are you going to go with one of Dawkin's suspicions on this one?
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light Actually, this argument is about choice. The American Psychological Association and 5 other Psychological and Medical organizations, as well as the National Association of Social Workers stated that being Homosexual, Heterosexual or Bisexual are not choices. Those seven organizations are my CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERTS. You stated you are not an expert and say being Gay is a choice but you never quoted a CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT who agrees with you.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 Yes yes yiou've posted that argument all over my video and I've already adressed it over ten times. The current argument that you have yet to counter is about evolution which you believe. not what an organization says. so counter.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@pete072313 Homosexuals cannot naturally reproduce. therefore if a gay gene existed it would be eliminated by the process of natural selection. This isn't about what Darwin said concerning homosexuality. Its about the fact that his theory (Which you believe, not I) does not support the existence of a gay gene. thats fact. now there are alternatives, like Dawkins who came up with possible exceptions. Do you adhere to any of these?
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light Although I believe in evolution, I didn’t bring it into the discussion, you did. Not only do you not believe it, you misinterpret what you read. As I said, you are not qualified to interpret a bus schedule, let alone the Bible or Darwin. As proof of this, in the last SEVEN months, you have been unable to find a single CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT who agrees with you.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 LOL Nope. i did. I thought you miight have more of an advantage if we spoke on your turf but you seem to understand it even less.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light For the past 7 months I have waited for you to prove that being Gay is a choice. In your 6 comments here you used 242 words and still have not offered CREDIBLE independently verifiable PROOF for your statements or quoted a CREDIBLE EXPERT who AGREES with you. YOU are admittedly NOT an expert in any field of Science or Religion, so your opinion, while cute, is not fact. I quoted my CREDIBLE EXPERTS and you quoted yourself misinterpreting Darwin and the Bible. Please do better.
pete072313 1 year ago
@hikari4light I contend that you have not listed any CREDIBLE independently verifiable PROOF or quoted any CREDIBLE EXPERTS because you cannot find any who agree with you. In sheer desperation you are unsuccessfully attempting to get me to ignore your failure. In fact, two days ago you had a hissy-fit and blocked me from your channel like a child running home with her toys because she didn’t like the rules. I am not following your childish rules because you are not qualified to lead.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 Lol I've been presenting you with evidence, the current concerning Darwin. and how the existence of a gay gene is not supported by his theory. counter.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light For the past 5 MONTHS you have not been able to properly state that my comments are ABOUT your video, they are neither IN nor ON nor ALL OVER your video. This just underscores your inability to understand proper American English.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 Exactly. thats why we say "on" as in " what is your opinion ON Obama's healthcare bill?" does it mean an opinion is literally on top of the bill ? no. they're using the word on synonymously with about. just like the emails"Someone has replied to your comment on..." not IN as you're mistaking it for.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light Congratulation! You only needed 154 words to say nothing this time. You indeed “quoted” Darwin, then used flawed assumptions. You are attempting to use this as the basis for your erroneous hypothesis. All I’m asking is that you quote a CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT who agrees with you. For 7 months you have been unable to do that.
I don’t have an opinion ON Obama’s health care bill, but I do have one ABOUT it. Quoting others with poor grammar doesn’t make yours correct.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 ROFL I already have. the real problem is that you have absolutely no idea what anything I've said means. Much less how to counter it. Whats completely hilarious is that you claim to believe Darwin's theory despite the fact you don't seem to know anything about it . I've left quotes from Darwin himself, Someone came and HANDED you Dawkins whom you could EASILY use to counter. You just don't get it.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@pete072313
Annnnnnd hikari4light has been blocked. =]
He is CLEARLY an idiot.
shane219 1 year ago
@shane219 Thanks. Yesterday she told me that she has "superiors" who tell her what she can and can't do. Does that sound like a cult to you, too? I've suggested to her that she sounds like a member of the Westboro Baptist Church. :o)
pete072313 1 year ago
@shane219 He's on a good 20 different "anti/pro-gay" vids and at this point he seems to be fighting for and against gays....I cant tell anymore....he seems to have the hots for darwin though >:D
ihavenonameeva 1 year ago
@pete072313 You're trying to argue that homosexuality is a genetic TRAIT not a GENE. Because assuming that there was a gay gene(Which is impossible by Darwin's theory) It would make the parents of that child Gay. if its a TRAIT carried on their genes. It would already be isolated. scientists would easily know which gene the homosexuality trait was carried on and could even calculate problability. but is homosexuality is not a genetic trait. . this whole issue would be a memory.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light No, I’m asking YOU to PROVE what you say by quoting a CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT. I don’t see why it’s so hard for you to understand what I’m asking for. I was kidding about you not being able to interpret a bus schedule, but now you have me wondering.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 I did. Darwin hinself. YTou have yet to counter.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@pete072313 Lol thats what we're posting on right now Pete. a video. We're leaving comments on (not in otherwise you could change it.) a video. A gayu gene is an impossibility by Darwin's theory of evolution. For this reason scientists believe in several genetic factors being the cause of homosexuality. .
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light If we are posting on a video, why is the video not changing? Your lack of understanding of English is disturbing. I have never posted anything on another person’s video. To begin with, I don’t have their passwords. YOU are the one who says that a Gay Gene is impossible, but you have never quoted a CREDIBLE independently verifiable EXPERT who agrees with you, probably because Experts know that nothing is impossible. You still have not proved that being Gay is a choice.
pete072313 1 year ago
@pete072313 ROFL ROFL ROFL we are not posting IN a video. that would mean we could change its contents. we are posting ON a video. We are leaveing comments in reference to it. Thats why the emails say "Someone has replied to your comment on..." not IN.' big difference.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light
Also, to clarify on your use of "theory": a scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules, scientific laws, which express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena.
Sovairu 1 year ago
@Sovairu Exactly. But even scientist know that the fact that a phenomena is observed in nature doesn't automatically make it natural or genetic. The assertion that there are "gay animals " for instance and that homosexual tendencies have been observed in them. have fed the theory that "being gay is not a choice" the observation fits the theory. genetics. but observations must be coupled with scientific law like Natural Selection , which doesn't allow for the existence of useless genes.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light
You also assume a false premise by claiming that a gene for homosexuality is not good for reproduction and would be eliminated through evolution. You falsely assume that homosexuals cannot reproduce. In reality, there is nothing physiologically preventing reproduction. A sperm from a man of ANY orientation will fertilize an egg from a woman of ANY orientation. The genes will still pass on. Physiologically, infertility or sterility actually prevent reproduction.
Sovairu 1 year ago
@SovairuTwo men having sex with one another produces nothing.
Two women having sex with one another produces nothing. Its biologically impossible.Lol true they can get artificially inseminated (in the case of lesbians) but thats an unknown man and a woman having a baby. True their genes will be passed, but a gay gene wouldn't be one of them , because useless genes are eliminated.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light
Here is an example of my previous statement: Megachurch Pastor Comes Out Of Closet on MegaQfactor's channel. The pastor has clearly fathered children and passed on his genes, yet he is also clearly gay, and has been since he can remember. Naturally and evolutionarily, homosexuality is also highly prevalent in other animals, mammals or otherwise: Homosexuality in Animals on groyn88's. Sexuality, homosexuality and otherwise, serves a variety of social and individual functions.
Sovairu 1 year ago
@Sovairu Lol the existence of a Gay gene is impossible with Natural Selection in the mix. If you mean to argue that its a trait carred by a gene tt would already be isolated. Lol I've yet to see a "gay animal" I've seen videos here that claim to depict them but all they do is mount one another which is done for countless reasons in the wild.hypothetically lets pretend they do exist. You can't use the fact tnat a group of organisms engage in a behavior to deem it natural or genetic.
hikari4light 1 year ago
@hikari4light
Evolutionarily speaking, left-handedness is no more useful nor more effective than right-handedness. Using only one hand predominately would seem counterintuitive to being ambidextrous. Besides, evolution is only the change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms through successive generations. Some diseases, like cystic fibrosis or sickle-cell disease, and other traits, like polydactyly are genetic in nature, yet they have not in any way been culled by Evolution.
Sovairu 1 year ago
@Sovairu lol you speak in terms of genetic traits. which are passed on by genes and can be isolated , the probability of their continuance easily determined.I speak of Genes themselves not the traits they carry. As far as genes are concerned. a gay one cannot exist. It would be useless and eliminated by the process of natural selection if it ever did. (hypothetically of course. again I don't believe the theory.)
hikari4light 1 year ago
@Sovairu LOl as for the scorn given us lefties, I faced some of that too (certainly not beating). but They never succeeded in making me use my other hand.
hikari4light 1 year ago
:D ur right
nanabad202 1 year ago
Until homophobic people are capable of having the intelligence of understanding that being gay or straight is not a choice, this kind of situation will continue to happen. Only bisexuals have a choice. If you know someone who has chosen then their bisexual. Straight people can't choose to be gay (ever!) and vice-versa.
Alex7STV 1 year ago
I hate it when people do that. I really agree with you. I think there should be more love and there should be acceptant of different ideas and ways of life.
If my child, if I had a child, said that they were gay, I'd be accepting because that's MY child. That's my creation of life. I completely agree with you.
hannah46018 1 year ago
pudrete
xXAbidorXx 1 year ago
Haha this you make no logical sense. Sorry, I just don't get it.
nycgirl999 1 year ago
omg yeahh i know mee to well im bi so i take it more into offense when people say stuff like that but yess im all with you btw i love your eyes they are wickedd bluee (:
cieraleex3 1 year ago
omg really the kid can play with the doll hes just a kid fer christs sake who cares
LadyMizra 1 year ago
Gayness happens when you a guy sticks his finger or/and penis in your anus and activates the "gay tigger" on th inside. Then you must be gay from then on.
JAGDPANTHER20 1 year ago
Your "two cents" was well worth listening to Shane!
hardscissors 1 year ago
Here's a good question : Why do gays actually like having a anothers mans dick in their ass?! I imagine that to be extremely painful. So do gays like this pain?! And how can you get horny when your sucking another guys dick?! And if you dress / talk / behave feminine, why don't you just get a sex change?! As a woman you would get more dick than you ever wished for. xD Nah, i'm just kidding! The more gays exist, the more straight woman are left for straight guys! (Like me) :D
WhyWomenAreStupid 1 year ago
@WhyWomenAreStupid To be honest, you sound kinda gay. You should only let those graphic thoughts swim around in your head..youtube is not really the place. Even your user name is a bit questionable. If you're so curious about anal sex with a man, you should go explore your city..maybe you can find some more guys like you, who also think "women are stupid"
Fantommenace23 1 year ago
@Fantommenace23 Sorry to dissapoint you, but i am 100% straight. Manass just does'nt turn me on. And my user-name refers to the girls/women that you can see in my uploaded videos, not every women on this planet. I'm not a sexist but sometimes women act incredible stupid, that's what my user-names means. And i'm not a gay-hater either, i just can't understand why guys prefer men over women. And last but not least, my previous comment was not meant to be absolutely serious.
WhyWomenAreStupid 1 year ago
Don't forget that there are a lot of good people in this country as well. I think that we even out number the bad. Most parents, I believe are like yourself, they practice unconditional love. Peace
aloquicious 1 year ago
Amen your exactally right u should love your children no matter what....and god created us all different if he wanted us all the same no one would be different....there would be no gays lesbians kids with missing limbs or mental retardations and we would all look and act the same....so just remember that you should love your child because you loved them before they told you they were gay why should your love change????.....can anyone tell me????
Kikocharmedonep3 1 year ago
any toy can be a sex toy, it's all about location. mua ha ha ha ha
FavsMy 1 year ago
mm about the age expectency thing... I dont think its true I mean, as long as your carefull to have safe sex you know? Anyways... about womens its a fact that having children will make a women age faster, the more you have the quicker you age. :P so technically, since gay women dont adopt (or other) that often... :P hehe
tenedria 1 year ago
i so agree with you! i would let him just go on with what ever makes him happy.
rockstarnikki17 1 year ago
your soooo right i mean my cousin hes a boy and he is 14,he still likes to wear wigs and walk in heels but hes not homo!
Fishyfries123 1 year ago
my mate and her gf have lesbian pet rats!
faggotry842 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My brothers and sisters we are living in a world today where things are like upside down. God vreated us with his image and it is human who created that way, and God created women for men because our God knew that man couldn't stay by himself. And after create of man, they were doing a lot of sins before God.................Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed by God because God was very angry of what they were doing.
cwolly100 1 year ago
Homosexuality is a perversion.
They all think that its love...but in nature you just don't see this kind of behavior. Only humans are prone to perversions.
SuperGrgur 1 year ago
@SuperGrgur you should learn more about nature...make some reserch and youll be shock HOW NATURE IS NOT THAT PERFECT!!!
fardoche1991 1 year ago
Many animals have been known to engage in homosexual acts. It's been documented, just look it up.
ImplodedToad 1 year ago
*cough cough cough* excuse me but yeah you do see this in nature, scientists calls this "Homosexual behaviour in animals" it was observed thousands of times. Just google it im sure you can easily find an article about this.
tenedria 1 year ago
i lovee this video im glad ur not a homophob and i have subscribed to u cuz i like ur singing lolz
TheNorkz 1 year ago
I hate fags!
Fags cause cancer
Fags ruin your body
Fags are dangerously adictive.
Second hand smoke from a fag can kill you faster\
If you dont get that I am talking about ciggerets (which are also called fags) then you are an idiot.
Now gays, I think they are awesome.
ImplodedToad 1 year ago 5
Excellent what your trying to say but "fag" is still a slur that people find offensive
ericjaames 1 year ago
@ImplodedToad FAGS you cannot be a chick with a dick!!
fardoche1991 1 year ago
Since Homosexuals have no biological tie's to their children I guess they can have sex legally with them when they become of age! I also hope you don't mind my views on Homosexuality, because I was born with an anti-gay gene and therefore I just can't help being the way I am towards you people! But I know since you are loving of all you can feel my pain in being born like this!
Bodebodango 1 year ago
so if your child wants to get a tattoo or get a lip ring thats ok too? its up to the parent to restrict their child's toy. if a child wants to play with a easy bake overn then ok thats fine get that child a oven that is steered toward their sex but if your child is cross dressing that can be more of a problem.
000toosmart 1 year ago
its true and its sad.
101Gauntlett101 1 year ago
nice, there is a lot of hate on this site just look at the comments you are getting i say thats fuck up
xgam3r1456 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what a faggot !
poopydoolarroo 1 year ago
Thanks for uploading these.
matthieus2 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow, is this what an 'emo-kid' looks like?
what a fag! lol
firebaby7 1 year ago
its not what u play with its who u play with
PLURolling 2 years ago
Awesome commentary on society, keep it up!
recita1717 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FRUIT
bananahead05 2 years ago
Boys who are playing with girl toys don't have to become homosexual. What about the GI-Joe dolls? These are boy toys aren't they? I'm gay but never ever played with dolls or play with make-up. And I have a few gay friends who are talented football players. So that did't changed them to straight men either.
dragpalacetv 2 years ago 9
It's such a sad terrible fear that if your child isn't masculine he will be gay. I played with some baby dolls when I was a little kid, and played with guns, played football, baseball, basketball; I'm straight. If anything it made me more nurturing and loving to my kids and my siblings children. Dragpalacetv, I totally agree with you, it is sad what society drives in people's heads. But I do think it is getting better little by little.
kidrebel20002000 1 year ago
lol XD ... its not that weird playing with toys doesent makes that kid gay ... except if he plays with female "sex toys" ...XDDD..
hamafziz 2 years ago
I believe gay people are gay from birth and so forcing them to behave macho would only likely transform them into a closet homosexual which is quite tragic. On the other hand it may prevent bullying at school so it is a hard one. Not sure how I would deal with that situation
1ngjoxsh 2 years ago 4
@1ngjoxsh
yes, also think that one is born gay.
but being that does not mean that he can't be macho. not all gay men are behaving female.
it's only a small percentage
HIMzone666returns 2 years ago 10
@HIMzone666returns
yeah but in that situation where a seemingly gay male child behaves as if a female it would look like he would become a feminine homosexual
1ngjoxsh 2 years ago
@1ngjoxsh
hmm
yes, maybe looks like that, but the child has been like that before in reality
HIMzone666returns 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Of course you would treat your kid indifferent! Because unless your boyfriends ass grows a womb you won't be having a kid anytime soon! thankfully all of nature isn't gay or we wouldn't have anyone living on this planet! Except for maybe Michael Jackson!
Bodebodango 2 years ago
Wow, how tragic if not every couple on this planet reproduces. There are straight couples that choose not to have kids either. Marriage and relationships aren't always about having a kid. There are many happy couples that are fine without children. I personally never want children, but I'm engaged and very happy with my boyfriend and I highly doubt our decision not to have kids will cause a wrinkle in the future of the world.. the same can be said for gay couples that can't reproduce.
danixcalifornia15 2 years ago
Or homosexuals could reduce the population in the orphanages. Because just because you are "able" to have a child doesn't mean you should. Homosexuals have many options to allow them to have children: surrogate mothers, adoption, and in vetro fertilization. So, that argument is terrible.
kidrebel20002000 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Your so right about putting a gay person up for adoption! I wouldn't put you up for adoption I would sell your ass and make money off you!
Bodebodango 2 years ago
I think that we will never be in a world without descrimination BECAUSE of the fact that we are all different. Sometimes i also wish we could live in a world without descrimination but than we would all be the same. You choose which one is better.
gigiperson123 2 years ago
I don't believe that. I don't think we all need to be the same to realize that we are all human beings with feelings. We can respect each other and our diffirences with out being all the same. We just need to see that deep down we are all the same in the sense we are all human beings and we should respect each other. We don't all have to be brain washed computer controled clones for us to get there do we?
fireflygirl246 2 years ago 2
V...V
xTorturedByDreamsX 2 years ago
I completely agree with you. In the movie "Kindergarten Cop", Arnold Schwarzenegger's character explained to one mother that the reason her son played with barbie dolls was because he liked looking underneath their skirts. The only reason I liked playing with dolls when I was a kid was to use them to create my own stories. As for your wish to live in a hate free world, unfortunately that is a wish that will never come true. Human beings have it in their nature to hate people who are different.
excentric1989 2 years ago
nice lips, and valid point. Go you!
bryguy1025 2 years ago
This boy sounds like me. I used to play with dolls and I carry a hermes bag. Someone joked about putting thier kids on adoption if they turn out gay and I responded, "Good, Ill adopt them and teach them to be better then you."
AstroMen2911 2 years ago 2
why is the bible being thrown in the comments? Anytime the word gay is brought into a discussion God is thrown at the situation. People worship in their own way and have different beliefs so leave God out of it. I completely agree with you and the ignorance of the homophobic mother fuckers out there is rediculous. I stick up for gay/lesbian/bi transgender the same way i stick up for different races. Everyone is a person whether light dark gay or straight so treat everyone the same ass holes
JakeGassiot2009 2 years ago 2
There is no socity that has no discrimantion welcome to the world of bull shit and hatered and all the people that get treated badly by ass holes just become ass holes too so its never ending cycle and its really sad but what ever i just have my own belifs and people can have theirs too it doesnt bug me one bit ok well have a good night everyone
RenockNecro 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
..If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon them" (Lev. 18:22, 20:13). look at this "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God" (1 Cor. 6:910, NIV).
LawyerMusic 2 years ago
honestly, i have zero respect for anyone that uses the Bible as a means of defending this issue. for a religion that is so strongly based off of love and helping others, so much time is spent condemning people to Hell. Take your hate filled views and find some other place to spew your garbage. for someone that is using religion as a source, you must then also know that there is only one man worthy of judging others...GOD HIMSELF. so take your self-righteous bullshit elsewhere. thanks! =]
shane219 2 years ago 12
@shane219 Well if you have read the bible you would know that god created adam and eve not adam and adam so gays are not normal even science has proven this males were ment to breed with females noy males and males that wrong and science also says that Homosexuality is a brain dysfunction cause when it comes to nature males were ment to breed with females not the other way around and im not judging you only god dose that im just point out
chrisredfield3636 1 year ago
@chrisredfield3636 no god did not create adam nd adam but god still loves u 4 who u are no matter what. so do ur self a favor ndread the bible go 2 church nd ask ur pastor if gays are normal u dumb fuck
nanabad202 1 year ago
@shane219 dude dont worry like watch fabled verse if ur search the bible and study throughly theirs nothing wrong with two people truely love each other
defrand14able 1 year ago
Comment removed
Zachhwithanhnotak 1 year ago
LawyerMusic, the Bible is nothing more than a series of man-written myths and fables. We do not need to base reality on such fairy tales.
GodCreatesGays2 2 years ago 4
@ LawyerMusic
God says question the bible.... FAIL, also says interpret it as you want... so bible beater u fail at ur own comments and beliefs...
Metriod29 2 years ago
Ok, you want to talk bible, how about this one. St. Matthew 19:12, " For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it." Eunich is someone who either has genital mutations, or cuts oneself off from a woman. Jesus said they are born that way.
kidrebel20002000 1 year ago
The definition of eunich from that time that the bible was written was that. Who cuts themselves off from women at birth? Homosexuals, your argument only prooves that the bible is full of contradictions.
kidrebel20002000 1 year ago
@LawyerMusic "The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals; it just that they need more supervision." -Lynn Lavner
Zachhwithanhnotak 1 year ago 2
Ever had a dildo shoved up your ass? You would change your opinion
mg5523 2 years ago
i give you a hug for being awesome
amurderofcrowz 2 years ago
do not talk shit any more ,please...
nemanjapandzic90 2 years ago
I agree with you totally.
And I also will love my child whatever he/she turns out to be!
SunshineeSue 2 years ago
Things will get better once the older generation dies off. With every new generation, things are more progressive.
Watch - in a decade or less gay marriage will be legal everywhere by the deep south and midwest.
lost2darkness 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
faggot
NateDawg111 2 years ago
@NateDawg111 FUCK YOU ASSHOLE GO SUCK A BIBLE!!!
321JeRoMe123 2 years ago
thank you
hah13 2 years ago
"Blew my mind" lol. I feel your pain and agree with you 100%.
I don't know about loving someone with no arms though. That's gotta be a sin... somewhere... XD
avatargir 2 years ago
dam these comments are fucked up. i totally agree!!
dagirl3242 2 years ago
hahahah!! What a goon!
RappyMcRapperson 2 years ago
fuck god, another free thinker. if u don't believe in creationism, which is ludicrous to believe in anyway, u can believe in god, but various parts of the bible just seem to build on assumptions, which r so clearly repudiated by the rational mind.
fullmetalcock666 2 years ago
Not everyone believes in god.
~your friendly neighborhood free thinker
scooterdo75 2 years ago