Not his best playing by a long shot, but let's be fair... One of the reasons it lands with such a splat is that he makes very spare use of the pedal so everything is exposed. It's very honest playing, and when he's having a better night (check out his Prokofiev Toccata on YT, for instance) the results are spectacular.
it certainly has a lot of energy but it is a pity that he plays as fast where the bad notes. I think too fast. Quite disappointing as interpretation. It takes a lot of work to get in playing this beautiful piece by Liszt
Certainly gets an A for energy. He's laying a mushroom cloud on the freaking piano. But he's paying for it with too much sloppiness for a competition, where they scrutinize every single note.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is hilarious. I like to watch this for fun. I'd like to punch this fuckhead in the face and watch the blood run down his Latvian necktie (or whatever the fuck he is).
I heard musicians in high school play Transcendent Etudes twice as good as the mn on the irregular tempo. Is that suposed to be Velocity or Cziffra virtuose variations or what?
I'm not sure what people expect out of this man's playing of Mazeppa at a Liszt competition. He's just using it to show off his technique. It's a competition, people!!
Well I give him credit for having some sense of technique. If he slowed it down, and worked on all the wrong notes, he would be good enough. Allthough its metalic, unmusical, and harsh...
NOT the "tru" way by any means! All the same there's plenty of flare here..As someone who's recently started learning this very hard piece, I enjoyed this.
Of course there isn't the wild excitement of Berezovsky on the one hand, or the beautiful sounds and musical maturity of Arrau, but we're talking genius here!
He deserves some credit... Pavel's OK, and I look foreward to hearing him again!
naah... prefer berezovsky... too rushed cant enjoy the notes... sounds like he was playing during basd weather with all those notes thundering down and sustaining atop each other causing a massacre of over built sounds on top of each other. even the slow part is sloppy.
I guess he just flew in and ran from the airport to play without preparations. He has a great tone, is playing much faster than a Berman version I know. Berman had much stronger long-wavelengths resonances to enjoy audience. But this guy still has a beautiful tone, obvious from the first chords. I think he will do very good.
His pedaling is terrible and his playing is choppy, as well. I believe likely heard the Lazar Berman recording and attempted to copy it, because his tempi and phrasing are fairly similar. In my opinion, it's a poor imitation.
Either my hearing's off, or I could hear 3 mistakes in the first minute alone, and they're repeated throughout the piece.
In your efforts to make the piece sound faster and lively, you ended up causing the reverse effect. It's slurred, sloppy, hard to hear, and generally a poor performance. You should slow down and nail the technique. You have to make a piece sound good before you try to make it sound great.
sui 3 minuti e 50 il tipo fa crepare dal ridere, sia per come saltella per le sprangate che tira su quei tasti prendendoli tutti forchè quelli giusti...Se non sei in grado di suonare un pezzo il repertorio classico ne ha altre migliaia che possono venirti sicuramente meglio
Buttarsi sul pianoforte o dentro il pianoforte produrrebbe effetti più gradevoli. Comunque qui si mostra la grandezza di Liszt, riesce a cantare anche sotto le bombe. bravo Franz. "Ma zeppo" di orror e di error
I cannot believe I'm the only one who sees the beauty in this interpretation, despite all the wrong notes. His execution of the middle section is at once hauntingly beautiful, but at the same time carries the malicious undertones that permeate the whole piece. The rest is frantic and out of control, yet it's all still a cohesive unit and each part flows logically into the next. I think overall it still "works" from a musical standpoint.
i agree, but i also think that his approach is somewhat too aggressive in places it shouldn't be and lacks variation - his interpretation is floaty however it is not meant to be equally expressive throughout. At 4:18-4:45 he is just tapping the notes without meaning and without emotion. This piece tells a complex story and the art behind this story is missing with him.
There's no doubt this is the worst version of this piece I have ever heard. Of course liszt wrote a large amount of pianistic bestialities, but he has taken this fact so far, so far that he can't control the beggining of the piece. Where's Romanticism? I'm sure we could be able to write another mazeppa only with the notes he failed.What a mess... esto ya es dar notas por dar notas, sin sentido alguno, realmente me ofende que a dia de hoy muchos consideren esto como la mejor interpretacion...
Liszt wrote some pieces that really go beyond the extremes of playing the piano.Each and everyone of these suckers shits himself while trying to play this.And I'm just having such a great time laughing at them:D I LMAO:D hahaha I think Liszt would have laughed too.That's why he wrote it, so that noone would be able to play it except him:D What a bunch of losers:DDD Hilarious.I'm having such a good time watching these suckers trying to do the impossible:DDD
Stupendo! Veramente eccezionale! Bella interpretazione! Si devono curare solo i finali delle note del controcanto, per il resto è la miglior esecuzione che io abbia mai sentito di mazeppa.
Beautiful interpretaion, big technique!
It is the Diabolic Liszt! It is the best Mazeppa i can hear. Those persons that say it is a mediocre interpretation can't be that stupids! (...)
thats exactly what you need, to play this dramatic morbid poem. mazeppa strapped naked on the back of the horse as punishment, which is set loose on the steppe galloping at breakneck speed.
first of all this etude doesn't pretend to be music and second I see the horse running with wide open nostrils, scum on his mouth in this interpretation. the thirds can be played a bit more staccato.
of course if you compare berezowsky and Bolet interpretations,they are absolutely amazing,instead of this,the marziale spirit of this piece is absolutely respected bye the artist.
I thoroughly enjoyed this performance. The thirds are ferocious, the octaves are terrifying, and the quiet interlude is executed with good contrast.
It's interesting to note that any really personal interpretation of a great piece is looked upon with disdain from the products of 20th century perfectionism and "note-perfect" crap. I am quite disappointed with most modern piano students because their playing is all the same.
I have a lot of respect for anyone who has the technical ability to play such a Behemoth of an etude. But this guy needs to spend a lot of time working on the musicality of this etude, rather than just the technical aspects.
this is a very physical performance, no matter how much he tries to act like he actually gets his musical emotions to play a role. but the temp i do not disagree with; i think this piece SHOULD be played this fast and Liszt probably played it even faster and more powerful. frankly, i enjoyed it.
im not denying you your right, you can criticize if you want
however you must take into consideration that pieces like these (writen by arguably the best pianst ever) are designed to be able to be played by only very gifted pianists..
yes his performance was ordinary
but the mere fact that he can play it, this fast and in front of a crowd, is very impressive
I agree with Jstanother.Also words like "sucks"are not suitable to describe ones performance.Perhaps radurak should read Schumann's critics on his fellow pianists and analyse Schumann's use of language.Bye
Which Liszt Competition is this? Utretcht? Weimar? Budapest? I think this is terrible and very unprofessional. But there was someone even worse on youtube playing Valse-Impromptu? Is this really who they let into the Liszt competition - Utretcht?
I love people, not mentioning any names ofcourse (petethepianist), that criticize such performances making comments like "this guy should be getting coffee for berezovsky"...course he's not that good....and wait a minute...neither are u...come to think of it i doubt u could play it at all...much less on a stage during a competition....my suggestion: go brew up some coffee urself
Yea, I agree that there are a lot of trashy comments. I thought he was great. I think he got the spirit right. I have heard too many that got a lot of notes but didn't seem to touch the soul of this piece. He hit on the heart of it.
and it's almost funny what happens to the speed around 4 minutes through the piece... but overall it's a great performance, or should i say, a great gesture :)
LOL!!! i agree with you pentium1000 that the "springy oscillations of his upper body" might throw a curious-one off for a noticeable grip, but you gotta cut the guy some slack... i mean he does looks like he's just not heavy enough to set-off the whoopee-cushion under his seat, but that's because of all the power he's setting behind every note, which is how this piece should be played. but that has nothing to do with the fact that he plays so many WRONG NOTES!
The interpretation is relatively good, but I still ponder which is more distracting: The plethora of erroneous notes, or the springy oscillations of his upper body.
quite a few wrong keys and ugly sounds not just because of the wrong keys but also because of playing some notes too strong and essentially banging away like he's playing the drums.
but, believe it or not, this piece is meant to be played even faster, and i've never heard anyone play it fast enough.
The entire piece sounds like a race to get to the end. He makes an almost forced break in section "Lo stesso tempo", but ultimately fails to grasp the fact that this is a romantic piece.
He has stupendous technique, especially in octaves.
I actually like this interpretation-sometimes you have to compromise with a piece like this because of the sheer musicality demanded from the performer. In this case mistakes are made but, in my opinion, he has an approach that is quite near to how this piece should played. Like Berezovsky, it is the harshness, severity and erratic nature that this piece is supposed to represent and Raikerus doesn't do a bad job.
Ahahaha I love it when amateurs try to sound like they know shit by saying a piece lacks in subtlety. This is MAZEPPA, a piece thats story is possibly based on a woman being raped by a horse. This is not Un Sospiro, and I doubt Liszt was playing it like a pussy back in his day. If you want boring go listen to Brendel and stfu 8)
For every famous pianist, or any artist for that manner, there are untold numbers of substantially greater artists living in the general community that nobody really knows about.
It's about being dragged by a horse until the horse dies from exhaustion lol. Read the poem. I personally love this version like nuts, and then the my favorite is the 2 piano version.
hey zepp, do you know what fingering he used? i think he still used 2/4. you know what would be interesting? i wanna see hamelin play this, with the 2/4 fingering. since hes the technique master, it'd be interesting =)
oh sorry, i meant i thought he didnt use 2/4 lol. you'd have to have such wrists to do that. hey and are you a musician or something? you seem really interested in these classical videos
Marvelous! Kind of the toughest piece there is too.
ATHENA3141 1 year ago
Not his best playing by a long shot, but let's be fair... One of the reasons it lands with such a splat is that he makes very spare use of the pedal so everything is exposed. It's very honest playing, and when he's having a better night (check out his Prokofiev Toccata on YT, for instance) the results are spectacular.
gtimny 1 year ago
pavel should report you for uploading this. He isn't really a bad pianist
ipvac1 2 years ago
it certainly has a lot of energy but it is a pity that he plays as fast where the bad notes. I think too fast. Quite disappointing as interpretation. It takes a lot of work to get in playing this beautiful piece by Liszt
musicien73 2 years ago 3
Certainly gets an A for energy. He's laying a mushroom cloud on the freaking piano. But he's paying for it with too much sloppiness for a competition, where they scrutinize every single note.
Phi1618033 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haha...what a joke he just made out of himself....sucker
mark4ever01 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is hilarious. I like to watch this for fun. I'd like to punch this fuckhead in the face and watch the blood run down his Latvian necktie (or whatever the fuck he is).
FrostyTheFuckhead 3 years ago
True way? :-)
I heard musicians in high school play Transcendent Etudes twice as good as the mn on the irregular tempo. Is that suposed to be Velocity or Cziffra virtuose variations or what?
konzolmester 3 years ago 3
I'm not sure what people expect out of this man's playing of Mazeppa at a Liszt competition. He's just using it to show off his technique. It's a competition, people!!
PeacfulJoh 3 years ago 5
god damn
that makes me sick.....
that's only speed
it ain't a good performance
and i didn't see your emotion
daniel830905 3 years ago
I don´t like it.
Georginito 3 years ago 2
Very impressive speed, but this performance proves that faster is not necessarily better.
BachScholar 3 years ago 3
there may be a few wrong notes, but how can you be this critical when none of you can even play the first couple of pages of this?
if you can prove otherwise, then i take it back and congratulations for being a virtuoso. i doubt it though
jimmyg01011 3 years ago
sauber ohne viel Peral, schönes Pempi..im Vortrag auch interessant. danke
wiesnase8 3 years ago
the worst interpretation I ever heard
L1ttl3Karl0s 3 years ago 4
ok, thanks for the correction, i'm french if you want to know.
Vanlioglu25 3 years ago
this is the worst interpretation that i have heard...
that's bad, we can't rate 0 star
Vanlioglu25 3 years ago
I like his style. It's a shame he made so many mistakes, but it's enjoyable nonetheless.
Must've been horribly frustrating to make so many mistakes; even in the 'easy' parts.
Corleone1337 3 years ago 2
very well.....but too frenithic and worry about the tecnique....he's CRAZY, not MAD,as he should be, like cziffra,you know. a bit esaurited....
however...compliments!
massy1111 3 years ago
Well I give him credit for having some sense of technique. If he slowed it down, and worked on all the wrong notes, he would be good enough. Allthough its metalic, unmusical, and harsh...
beryllium2 3 years ago
mannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
i cant believ i nevah favortid thiz
rezpec
Rob48 3 years ago
Never falls below a mf.
gxfu0127 3 years ago
NOT the "tru" way by any means! All the same there's plenty of flare here..As someone who's recently started learning this very hard piece, I enjoyed this.
Of course there isn't the wild excitement of Berezovsky on the one hand, or the beautiful sounds and musical maturity of Arrau, but we're talking genius here!
He deserves some credit... Pavel's OK, and I look foreward to hearing him again!
pianocommy 3 years ago
god what the.. did he put the pedal on auto-pilot?
brozors 3 years ago
naah... prefer berezovsky... too rushed cant enjoy the notes... sounds like he was playing during basd weather with all those notes thundering down and sustaining atop each other causing a massacre of over built sounds on top of each other. even the slow part is sloppy.
Good Pianist, Bad interpretation... TOO SHOWY.
Zoaguyver 3 years ago
I guess he just flew in and ran from the airport to play without preparations. He has a great tone, is playing much faster than a Berman version I know. Berman had much stronger long-wavelengths resonances to enjoy audience. But this guy still has a beautiful tone, obvious from the first chords. I think he will do very good.
joesubaruson 3 years ago
His pedaling is terrible and his playing is choppy, as well. I believe likely heard the Lazar Berman recording and attempted to copy it, because his tempi and phrasing are fairly similar. In my opinion, it's a poor imitation.
gojewla 3 years ago
Either my hearing's off, or I could hear 3 mistakes in the first minute alone, and they're repeated throughout the piece.
In your efforts to make the piece sound faster and lively, you ended up causing the reverse effect. It's slurred, sloppy, hard to hear, and generally a poor performance. You should slow down and nail the technique. You have to make a piece sound good before you try to make it sound great.
SilentViolins 3 years ago
yes if this was me on youtube i would be embarrased after all the hours working on it
afertyus1000 3 years ago 4
so much tallent and speed, and yet he doesnt know how to playe it..
konzolmester 3 years ago
No datruzpp, this is not the true way, what do you know about Liszt anyway, your an idiot who can't even spell properly.
maxi937 3 years ago
if you can make it through the first half the end is actually good
HUNTPIECENIGGA 3 years ago
what a stupid man.
piano0989 3 years ago 6
let's play piano with a hammer - terrible.
9sibra 3 years ago 4
lol
MaksutovCG 3 years ago
sui 3 minuti e 50 il tipo fa crepare dal ridere, sia per come saltella per le sprangate che tira su quei tasti prendendoli tutti forchè quelli giusti...Se non sei in grado di suonare un pezzo il repertorio classico ne ha altre migliaia che possono venirti sicuramente meglio
demothefuckin89 3 years ago
Buttarsi sul pianoforte o dentro il pianoforte produrrebbe effetti più gradevoli. Comunque qui si mostra la grandezza di Liszt, riesce a cantare anche sotto le bombe. bravo Franz. "Ma zeppo" di orror e di error
enantiodrom 3 years ago
I cannot believe I'm the only one who sees the beauty in this interpretation, despite all the wrong notes. His execution of the middle section is at once hauntingly beautiful, but at the same time carries the malicious undertones that permeate the whole piece. The rest is frantic and out of control, yet it's all still a cohesive unit and each part flows logically into the next. I think overall it still "works" from a musical standpoint.
Also, HOLY CRAP THOSE OCTAVES.
javacisnotrecognized 3 years ago
Actually I don't find this that bad too.
jero13595 3 years ago
i agree, but i also think that his approach is somewhat too aggressive in places it shouldn't be and lacks variation - his interpretation is floaty however it is not meant to be equally expressive throughout. At 4:18-4:45 he is just tapping the notes without meaning and without emotion. This piece tells a complex story and the art behind this story is missing with him.
MaksutovCG 3 years ago 4
horrible...
konzolmester 3 years ago 2
Wow, look, someone has memorised a large series of complicated movements. Hardly art.
This is not the 'true way'. Not only is there no such thing as the 'true way', but this soulless interpretation is hardly the 'true way'.
morphasesystem 3 years ago
There's no doubt this is the worst version of this piece I have ever heard. Of course liszt wrote a large amount of pianistic bestialities, but he has taken this fact so far, so far that he can't control the beggining of the piece. Where's Romanticism? I'm sure we could be able to write another mazeppa only with the notes he failed.What a mess... esto ya es dar notas por dar notas, sin sentido alguno, realmente me ofende que a dia de hoy muchos consideren esto como la mejor interpretacion...
anferlo 3 years ago
That poor piano. It must have been Hospitalized after this Abusive Attack.
NordicHealer 3 years ago 3
lol...
jero13595 3 years ago
tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo fast
piano0989 3 years ago
Oh god make it stop!
thesunlessea 3 years ago 3
plaese!!!!!stop!!!!
piano0989 3 years ago 3
Liszt wrote some pieces that really go beyond the extremes of playing the piano.Each and everyone of these suckers shits himself while trying to play this.And I'm just having such a great time laughing at them:D I LMAO:D hahaha I think Liszt would have laughed too.That's why he wrote it, so that noone would be able to play it except him:D What a bunch of losers:DDD Hilarious.I'm having such a good time watching these suckers trying to do the impossible:DDD
DjKrisz 3 years ago
good, its a very hard piece
oloindafolo 3 years ago
bezerovsky plays it much much better and nicer
drummernr1 3 years ago
Stupendo! Veramente eccezionale! Bella interpretazione! Si devono curare solo i finali delle note del controcanto, per il resto è la miglior esecuzione che io abbia mai sentito di mazeppa.
Beautiful interpretaion, big technique!
It is the Diabolic Liszt! It is the best Mazeppa i can hear. Those persons that say it is a mediocre interpretation can't be that stupids! (...)
Malatopianist1 3 years ago
Wonderful technique; mediocre interpretation. Sorry, but it's my opinion.
Havenscope 3 years ago 3
bad technique plus bad musicality..
no need to say sorry.. this is really bad. It is not only your opinion but it should be the opinion of all people who have thoughts.
cholapat 3 years ago
Beautiful interpretaion, big technique!
It is the Diabolic Liszt! It is the best Mazeppa i can hear. Those persons that say it is a mediocre interpretation can't be that stupids! (...)
Malatopianist1 3 years ago
what made you angry?
and what make you think this performance is superior?
please answer.. i really wanna know how come.
He plays so harsh...loudly and forcefully with all the other sounds.
It is nothing but a mess. Why appreciate him?
cholapat 3 years ago
misses every other note...
BachFong11 3 years ago
Really ugly performance.
Just like fast Czerny exercise. Ugly..............Not nuances, not nothing.
ytpiano7
ytpiano7 3 years ago
I did some research. He (Pavel Raikerus) got to the semifinals: final 9 performers in the Liszt competition in 2005 in Utretcht.
cdpiano27 4 years ago
wow! amazing.
but a bit too fast
jgsky 4 years ago
He has but one qualification to play this piece: the soul of a horse.
pianopera 4 years ago 4
...the soul of a horse....
thats exactly what you need, to play this dramatic morbid poem. mazeppa strapped naked on the back of the horse as punishment, which is set loose on the steppe galloping at breakneck speed.
first of all this etude doesn't pretend to be music and second I see the horse running with wide open nostrils, scum on his mouth in this interpretation. the thirds can be played a bit more staccato.
keesmees777 3 years ago
hes playing waay too fast for this piece
henrypurcell111 4 years ago
I really enjoyed the first 3:10. Almost an homage to Berman, but then the rest fell apart for me- notes, music, interpretation.
feenix1keith 4 years ago
of course if you compare berezowsky and Bolet interpretations,they are absolutely amazing,instead of this,the marziale spirit of this piece is absolutely respected bye the artist.
kreutzo1 4 years ago
I thoroughly enjoyed this performance. The thirds are ferocious, the octaves are terrifying, and the quiet interlude is executed with good contrast.
It's interesting to note that any really personal interpretation of a great piece is looked upon with disdain from the products of 20th century perfectionism and "note-perfect" crap. I am quite disappointed with most modern piano students because their playing is all the same.
Reaper978 4 years ago 2
I have a lot of respect for anyone who has the technical ability to play such a Behemoth of an etude. But this guy needs to spend a lot of time working on the musicality of this etude, rather than just the technical aspects.
OverFjell 4 years ago
this is a very physical performance, no matter how much he tries to act like he actually gets his musical emotions to play a role. but the temp i do not disagree with; i think this piece SHOULD be played this fast and Liszt probably played it even faster and more powerful. frankly, i enjoyed it.
ibclappin 4 years ago
The problem are not the wrong notes, it can happen in a live performance and in a such hard piece.
The problem is that this guy didn't understand a thing about MUSIC!!!
And it's awful to hear someone playing so superficial in the same way he is just opening a pig to make sausages!
Definitely too bad to take part to a Liszt Competition.
Pucicchio 4 years ago
all the people saying this is bad.. id very much like to see you play it better..
berezovsky is obviously better becasue of less mistakes
but this guy is definately quality
JstAnothrVirtuoso 4 years ago
I can't play it better, but i think this performance sucks.
Now what? Do you want to tell me that i have no right to have an opinion because i can't play Mazeppa?
It's a cheap argument. Criticism is not dependent on the ability to make it better, and never was.
radurak 4 years ago
im not denying you your right, you can criticize if you want
however you must take into consideration that pieces like these (writen by arguably the best pianst ever) are designed to be able to be played by only very gifted pianists..
yes his performance was ordinary
but the mere fact that he can play it, this fast and in front of a crowd, is very impressive
JstAnothrVirtuoso 4 years ago 2
I agree with Jstanother.Also words like "sucks"are not suitable to describe ones performance.Perhaps radurak should read Schumann's critics on his fellow pianists and analyse Schumann's use of language.Bye
lipattihaskill 4 years ago
Which Liszt Competition is this? Utretcht? Weimar? Budapest? I think this is terrible and very unprofessional. But there was someone even worse on youtube playing Valse-Impromptu? Is this really who they let into the Liszt competition - Utretcht?
cdpiano27 4 years ago
TERRIBLE ! HORRIBLE ! CATASTROPHE !
funny161616 4 years ago
omg, the first page's cadenza was terrible...and the thirds are even worse. I can play this piece better right now..
michaelkid13 4 years ago
LEGENDARY!!!
AHAHA, dis iz da only perf dat unleashes ds inzane rape zects at da tru speed. And, at tiz zpeed zum wrong notes juz increase da fury.
RESPECT!!!
mkaykov 4 years ago
I love people, not mentioning any names ofcourse (petethepianist), that criticize such performances making comments like "this guy should be getting coffee for berezovsky"...course he's not that good....and wait a minute...neither are u...come to think of it i doubt u could play it at all...much less on a stage during a competition....my suggestion: go brew up some coffee urself
BennoKnotta 4 years ago
menziolatec!!!!!!!
7milord7 4 years ago
This is pretty awful. What are the preliminary requirements to get into the competition?
MikeMan2727 4 years ago
He amazingly got to the semifinals (the final 9 people!!) What??!!!
cdpiano27 3 years ago
the semifinals of the Liszt compeition in Utretcht in 2005!! I think this was so sloppy that he should have been out after this, in the first round!
cdpiano27 3 years ago
ahahah tru
rezpec da jury n no rezpec fo yo puzzy lil azz
datruzepp 3 years ago
I can't even count all the missed notes here....
BachFong11 4 years ago
at da zpeed he playz at, i wudn expect u to
datruzepp 4 years ago
Does anyone know someone who can play the thirds correctly?
xiphoid13 4 years ago
I play it with thirds. will put post up eventually.
doofus69chris 4 years ago
this guy should be getting coffee for berezovsky.... seems to be the extent of his talent.
petethepianist 4 years ago
if you're really a pianist, you should be ashamed of you for making such a self-defeating comment. fucked up.
pyroprince78 4 years ago
THIRDS not LEGATO!! This is a horse riding, not a boat on the ocean!
liszt80 4 years ago
good idea but he takes a lot of mistakes=/
pianisamet 4 years ago
im hearing alot of added notes.
Xanthous04 4 years ago
To all people who reacted on this Mazeppa: an old Dutch expression: "The best Steersmen are on shore "
EtrofOnaip 4 years ago
He plays it too agressive
nico22059 4 years ago
Being dragged behind a horse is an aggressive thing.
DoctorChode 4 years ago
not good. At all.
radurak 4 years ago
He's excellent, but he plays it too fast. Especially the part at the start.
digiarto 4 years ago
Horses run fast, guy.
DoctorChode 4 years ago
this guy sux!
fortissimo25 4 years ago
This guy needs to stop letting his left hand overpower the entire piano...
celach 4 years ago
He´s got a great technique, but he hasn´t understood this piece, he plays it really loud, even at partes he should play soft
nico22059 4 years ago
Indeed. Good observation.
celach 4 years ago
Too fast!
he should be more steadly, and he has too many mistakes.
takeval 4 years ago
Yea, I agree that there are a lot of trashy comments. I thought he was great. I think he got the spirit right. I have heard too many that got a lot of notes but didn't seem to touch the soul of this piece. He hit on the heart of it.
pdsimdars 4 years ago
and it's almost funny what happens to the speed around 4 minutes through the piece... but overall it's a great performance, or should i say, a great gesture :)
ibclappin 4 years ago
too many mistakes
jackewiebohne 4 years ago
LOL!!! i agree with you pentium1000 that the "springy oscillations of his upper body" might throw a curious-one off for a noticeable grip, but you gotta cut the guy some slack... i mean he does looks like he's just not heavy enough to set-off the whoopee-cushion under his seat, but that's because of all the power he's setting behind every note, which is how this piece should be played. but that has nothing to do with the fact that he plays so many WRONG NOTES!
ibclappin 4 years ago
The interpretation is relatively good, but I still ponder which is more distracting: The plethora of erroneous notes, or the springy oscillations of his upper body.
pentium1000 4 years ago
indeed!
meneltar 4 years ago
extremely difficult,he plays it like a streetfighter without much finesse but fair play to him
afertyus1000 4 years ago
Amazing that anyone could critique this presentation who isn't qualified to play it better. Talk about sour grapes!!
wborgstro 4 years ago
well I thought it was cool!
pokadots00 4 years ago
He plays alot of mistakes, but I like his interpretation alot! For me this is mazeppa, he understands liszt.
michieldpiano 4 years ago
feel the trembling of the pavement indeed
mistake-ridden tho
kapayazi808 4 years ago
this guy would be a good drummer!
quite a few wrong keys and ugly sounds not just because of the wrong keys but also because of playing some notes too strong and essentially banging away like he's playing the drums.
but, believe it or not, this piece is meant to be played even faster, and i've never heard anyone play it fast enough.
ibclappin 4 years ago
The entire piece sounds like a race to get to the end. He makes an almost forced break in section "Lo stesso tempo", but ultimately fails to grasp the fact that this is a romantic piece.
He has stupendous technique, especially in octaves.
gordonf238 4 years ago
He plays excellently with perfect executions, but his body movements are awkward and distracting.
OorvakanSar 4 years ago
I actually like this interpretation-sometimes you have to compromise with a piece like this because of the sheer musicality demanded from the performer. In this case mistakes are made but, in my opinion, he has an approach that is quite near to how this piece should played. Like Berezovsky, it is the harshness, severity and erratic nature that this piece is supposed to represent and Raikerus doesn't do a bad job.
richardfrommatrix 4 years ago
i mean i know this piece is very very very difficult but damn try to cut down on mistakes please.
cliffman16 4 years ago
zhat zanguaje zou zpeakth?
ibclappin 4 years ago
jeeez.. that's what you call octave technique
englishphil37 4 years ago
i think this is truly how Liszt must have played it. except he probably didn't play so many wrong keys but altogether it's great.
ibclappin 4 years ago
ahahaha zadly da PIMP himzelf lykly played it at half diz zpeed
datruzepp 4 years ago
amazingly with minimal physical effort.
ibclappin 4 years ago
"excuze da random jeff rip wiz fucked endin"
WTF, I didn't mezzed up da ending, ma vid cap wuz flawlezz
tiz pozz da Utube komprezzion fuckzup
jefftam1234 4 years ago
Ahahaha I love it when amateurs try to sound like they know shit by saying a piece lacks in subtlety. This is MAZEPPA, a piece thats story is possibly based on a woman being raped by a horse. This is not Un Sospiro, and I doubt Liszt was playing it like a pussy back in his day. If you want boring go listen to Brendel and stfu 8)
John11inch 5 years ago
ahahahaha rezpec! da zkep zpeakth da truth, unpredicktably 8)
datruzepp 4 years ago
it sounds like hes messes up at the beginning, it just sounds weird to me
Krazypaul 5 years ago
hahaha jaapaap5 =D...
FernandoPaganni 5 years ago
GOD what i wouldn't give to play this piece..
thepolonaise 5 years ago
smash smash smash!! I can smash the piano like that too if I spent my entire life working on technique.
Ravel87 5 years ago
is that bill gates on the piano?
jaapaap5 5 years ago
he definately plays fast and very accurately but i don't think he has a great piano technique,its very exciting though
dlg111 5 years ago
omg and i thought boris was amazing O_O
kapayazi808 5 years ago
For every famous pianist, or any artist for that manner, there are untold numbers of substantially greater artists living in the general community that nobody really knows about.
DoctorChode 4 years ago
I disagree, so there. The truth always shows itself.
OorvakanSar 4 years ago
This is too amazing for words.
Mooggiee 5 years ago
LEGENDARY
terryregnar 5 years ago
you dont just press on it u make it sound like a glitter.... are you self taught?
pkpureatk77511 5 years ago
It's about being dragged by a horse until the horse dies from exhaustion lol.
dnephi 5 years ago
comme and the iron thumb both in this thread... wow
if the song is about getting raped by a horse... then the middle must have been the cuddling. lol.
LordDazzer 5 years ago
This is great. Speed and Fury. BTW what fingering does he use ont he thirds? 24 24 or facilitated?
dnephi 5 years ago
sum gud sheeeeeyat mofo!!! kick azzzzzzzzz!!!
sumcrzymofo 5 years ago
This is a wonderful interpretation, magnificent fingerwork and razor sharp octaves.
By the way, how many of you lot are you from that weird speed demon community site? This thread has been seriously hijacked!!
Razaak 5 years ago
Incorrect; ziff and da bear both pwn.
Thracozaag 5 years ago
rezpec da ZIFF trillz at da ZEPPAH
tru wif da BEAR
Etudes 5 years ago
hahaha lez juz all agree dat:
TIZ DA BEZ ZEPP PERF EVAH
tru
datruzepp 5 years ago
diz piece iz about bein raped by a fuckin horze, diz perf exprezzez dat mo den any otha rec
DaComme 5 years ago
the other way round, it is about raping a horse. The orcherstral version is so much better.
suremate 5 years ago
It's about being dragged by a horse until the horse dies from exhaustion lol. Read the poem. I personally love this version like nuts, and then the my favorite is the 2 piano version.
dnephi 5 years ago
I'd say that qualifiez az rape.
suremate 5 years ago
he plays like a "show-off piece".But i think Liszt doesn't compose it for that.
parule 5 years ago
HAHAHAH DAYM, tiz obviouz u lack da knowledge of da PIMP compo n virtuzo sheeyatz tru.
da pimp wuz pozzibly da biggezt showoff of da 19th century, diz y he invted da ZOLO RECITAL.
daTruCatz 5 years ago
altho accordin to da zepp, he apparently gave in to da zl*w world once he waz an old mofo
daTruCatz 5 years ago
While it iz tru zhowy, muzic and fury are da prime directive.
dnephi 5 years ago
hey zepp, do you know what fingering he used? i think he still used 2/4. you know what would be interesting? i wanna see hamelin play this, with the 2/4 fingering. since hes the technique master, it'd be interesting =)
PianoTony 5 years ago
hahaha a bit unlykly, but rezpec yo faith in da PAV
n da DOC wud lykly give a ztunninly fluid interp, but no mo
datruzepp 5 years ago
oh sorry, i meant i thought he didnt use 2/4 lol. you'd have to have such wrists to do that. hey and are you a musician or something? you seem really interested in these classical videos
PianoTony 5 years ago
almoz fazt enuff fo ma taztez
DaComme 5 years ago